So you want a license that will scare off any.commercial company from touching it? with those terms most companies will stick to a proprietary solution instead.
Huh? Relicensing the code would violate the license. even with BSD only the.copyright owner can relicense it. Yes it can be integrated with.proprietary code, but that doesn't mean it's been relicensed.
That's all fine and dandy but if I don't know the projects name how will I know which request.for.help is his? As I said if help him with maintaining the project but I can't help without knowing its name. I'm offering to help here and now. If I'm going to have to wait forever for him to post his request on some other site then I'll just move on. No big loss for me.
Yes there are idiots who would do that. So what? If the guy wants help he's going to have to give out the name. I'd be interested but if the guy won't say the name it'll be a bit hard to help them.
And even if they were held to it, they only have to release any patches to the kernel. Which means drivers won't get released nor any changes to Android itself. So they will almost nothing of real value.
And you're going to enlist to help fight as well, no? Oh wait it's just another basement armchair general blustering about starting wars but too chickenshit to actually do any of the fighting.
All it takes is a simple google search to find numerous claims of Linux being impenetrable. It doesn't matter the claims are wrong, but the claims have been made by write a few people.
It means there are probably quite a few rooted Linux boxes out there and the users don't realize it because they bought into hype that their computer had impenetrable security.
Slashdot Mirror
*facepalm* I was talking about what the person I was responding to quoted in their post. Reading comprehension ftw!
You apparently didn't comprehend what you posted. The 24-bit dsp is what decodes the mp3s not the 8-bit cpu.
The Microtouch is a mobile media device that aims to become an open-source alternative to the iPod Touch.
Yeah keep dreaming.
It may not be more efficient but it is certainly better for the ecosystem.
I've spoken to dozens of people in my office and they all say they haven't placed a pre-order and are not interested in the 4S at all.
Wow...that's like....EVERYONE!
Except it's not called "Apps Engine". Hell the linked article at the top says "Google App Engine Blog".
At least we aren't bring bombarded with bitcoin stories anymore. Looks like once taco left the bitcoin shilling fell away.
Is it even up? The site says it will "be back soon" for a while.
So you want a license that will scare off any.commercial company from touching it? with those terms most companies will stick to a proprietary solution instead.
Huh? Relicensing the code would violate the license. even with BSD only the.copyright owner can relicense it. Yes it can be integrated with.proprietary code, but that doesn't mean it's been relicensed.
That's all fine and dandy but if I don't know the projects name how will I know which request.for.help is his? As I said if help him with maintaining the project but I can't help without knowing its name. I'm offering to help here and now. If I'm going to have to wait forever for him to post his request on some other site then I'll just move on. No big loss for me.
True but for someone interested.in helping the question asker I can't do so without the software's name.
Yes there are idiots who would do that. So what? If the guy wants help he's going to have to give out the name. I'd be interested but if the guy won't say the name it'll be a bit hard to help them.
So you want to spread the word but won't even give out the name?
And even if they were held to it, they only have to release any patches to the kernel. Which means drivers won't get released nor any changes to Android itself. So they will almost nothing of real value.
Yes my mom is a slut. Your point?
To follow, unless someone can prove that they patched the kernel HP doesn't have to release jack.
The license of Android is Apache 2.0 which has no such requirement.
And you're going to enlist to help fight as well, no? Oh wait it's just another basement armchair general blustering about starting wars but too chickenshit to actually do any of the fighting.
Yep and Larry is yawning with boredom and goes back to having his threesome on a pile of thousand dollar bills.
being obliged to pay license to flash is much worse for them.
This comment makes no sense. Why would Apple have paid a license for Flash on iOS?
They are going to make sure to do this at night, right? It would be too hot for the probe during the day, right?
All it takes is a simple google search to find numerous claims of Linux being impenetrable. It doesn't matter the claims are wrong, but the claims have been made by write a few people.
It means there are probably quite a few rooted Linux boxes out there and the users don't realize it because they bought into hype that their computer had impenetrable security.
More like "Methinks GNOME fanbois are too thin-skinned".