The threat that stopped the movie from being released was the claim of blowing up theaters. Why would the theater chains who backed out care about Sony's data being leaked?
Since you assign God-like powers to the NSA, give up now because nothing is secure.
Subverting standards and products is not having a God-like power. It's well within the means of a nation-state agency with an unlimited black budget. Their own documents even prove this.
Sony was going to release it up until all the major theater chains said they wouldn't show it. It's sort of hard to release a movie into theaters when none of them will show it.
Exactly. Sony was going to press forward with the release regardless of the intrusion. What shutdown the movie was the pastebin threat that caused a bunch of theater chains to shit themselves.
Again, you've not actually contradicted me. Subsidiaries are subject to the laws and courts of the country under which they've incorporated. In the case of Sony Pictures that is the US.
Hahaha. That's gotta be one of the dumbest things I've ever read. Sony Pictures is a US corporation precisely because of its country of incorporation. The country you incorporate in is the country under which law you are subject to.
You aren't really dumb enough to think being a subsidiary of an international company means that the subsidiary isn't subject to the laws of the country it's incorporated in, do you?
And that contradicts anything I said, how? A US corporation, Sony Pictures, is still subject to US laws and courts. It being the subsidiary of an international company doesn't change that.
Last I checked, Sony Pictures Digital Productions, Inc. was a subsidiary incorporated in California as entity CA468715. And last time I checked, California was a US state.
No it's just genuinely poor in general. I tried idioms even in langauges like Spanish and many were poorly translated. I then tried translating English idioms to other languages and then back to English and they were almost always mangled as well.
Java - it's way nicer for actually providing a precise, fast, rich client experience in the browser,
The only thing the Java applet platform is "nicer" at is providing a huge security hole in your system to be exploited. Java applets are ugly, slow and horrendous to use.
Plenty of contemporaries said that the Patriot Act would to lead all the things it has. That you're ignorant of them does not mean they didn't exist. The ACLU was all over trying to fight against it due to all its onerous provisions. Michael Moore, love him or hate him, was all over it at the time in his film Fahrenheit 9/11. But at the time many of these criticisms were shot down as being overreactions.
It's not bullshit. If people are unwilling to spend any amount of money on something that means it has no financial value to them. Thus by definition it would be "worthless".
The threat that stopped the movie from being released was the claim of blowing up theaters. Why would the theater chains who backed out care about Sony's data being leaked?
Since you assign God-like powers to the NSA, give up now because nothing is secure.
Subverting standards and products is not having a God-like power. It's well within the means of a nation-state agency with an unlimited black budget. Their own documents even prove this.
Sony was going to release it up until all the major theater chains said they wouldn't show it. It's sort of hard to release a movie into theaters when none of them will show it.
Have pigs sprouted wings and started flying in your universe?
And posting to pastebin is now "coding" apparently.
How dare you! Posting to pastebin is coding!!!
Nothing. This is just unadulterated clickbait.
Other than straight to video there is no where to release it to. Most of the theater chains in the US backed away from it.
Exactly. Sony was going to press forward with the release regardless of the intrusion. What shutdown the movie was the pastebin threat that caused a bunch of theater chains to shit themselves.
Again, you've not actually contradicted me. Subsidiaries are subject to the laws and courts of the country under which they've incorporated. In the case of Sony Pictures that is the US.
Hahaha. That's gotta be one of the dumbest things I've ever read. Sony Pictures is a US corporation precisely because of its country of incorporation. The country you incorporate in is the country under which law you are subject to.
You aren't really dumb enough to think being a subsidiary of an international company means that the subsidiary isn't subject to the laws of the country it's incorporated in, do you?
And that contradicts anything I said, how? A US corporation, Sony Pictures, is still subject to US laws and courts. It being the subsidiary of an international company doesn't change that.
Sony Pictures is. It's incorporated in California.
Last I checked, Sony Pictures Digital Productions, Inc. was a subsidiary incorporated in California as entity CA468715. And last time I checked, California was a US state.
Sony Pictures is a US subsidiary. Sony the parent has plenty of US-based subsidiaries.
samzenpus isn't even fully literate in his native language. So... probably not.
No it's just genuinely poor in general. I tried idioms even in langauges like Spanish and many were poorly translated. I then tried translating English idioms to other languages and then back to English and they were almost always mangled as well.
They are providing end-to-end encryption. They probably just control the keys.
Why would they need one if either or both the random number generator is weak or the encryption algorithm is vulnerable to cryptanalysis?
Even Google Translate gets almost all of them right, and will translate idioms directly into a corresponding idiom in the target language.
No, actually it gets most of them wrong. I ran a number of Japanese idioms and proverbs and more than 95% of them were hilariously badly translated.
Java - it's way nicer for actually providing a precise, fast, rich client experience in the browser,
The only thing the Java applet platform is "nicer" at is providing a huge security hole in your system to be exploited. Java applets are ugly, slow and horrendous to use.
He wouldn't have voteoed it regardless of the margin. He's basically Dubya II.
Plenty of contemporaries said that the Patriot Act would to lead all the things it has. That you're ignorant of them does not mean they didn't exist. The ACLU was all over trying to fight against it due to all its onerous provisions. Michael Moore, love him or hate him, was all over it at the time in his film Fahrenheit 9/11. But at the time many of these criticisms were shot down as being overreactions.
If and only if they also do not visit the site. Not being willing to spend money does not equal worthless as their time has worth.
People waste time on lots of things they think are worthless. Spending time to do something doesn't mean you give it worth.
It's not bullshit. If people are unwilling to spend any amount of money on something that means it has no financial value to them. Thus by definition it would be "worthless".