I don't think the author does have a point. After using Vista, I think it's the money put behind discovering the the sweetspot, and zeroing on that. Is Vista perfect, no. But is that a reflection of my deviation from the exact center of the sweetspot, or microsofts failure to anticipate users wants and needs. No, I think that they cast a wide and tight net, catch 95% of the fish, and the rest serve everyone else. Which is good, a real and public good, which doesn't seem to be recognized by the article. Vista will win me back from KDE, it already has honestly. I even had occasion to use OS X intensively this week, and it is not for me. But that heterogenious nature of the OS spectrum insures no one has to go unserved. If Vista had been a horrible catastrophe in my eyes, KDE would have continued to serve me well. Failing that, 2k. To be sure there is someone with a MacBook out there thinking "I love OS X, but worst case scenerio, but if I had to settle, Gnome is good enough." Now if me and him were to meet there would jungle rythems and one of us would be Kirk, and the other would be a lizard man in a loincloth. But the fact remains that while Microsoft serves most, likely best, all should be served as they wish, even if it's a cloud of rabbid individuals who demand full control, no matter how byzantine, over their user experience. We are all discreet elements in an appearently continuous spectrum
Whoever gave this 0 is obviusly biased towards OS-X or something I give you a 5 for writing a story about you're opinion.
Why? Because somebody with two sentances of nothingness got a 5 I am dissapointed in whoever rated this.....
And yes I agree with what you said,"for the most part". God dang OS-X user probably rated you 0 cause he uses it, just stupid. But the main problem there is that its not on the main page of this article, and it should.
I was playing M games when I was 5 I am a good person and I have good parents, so anyone who says thats wrong, in my opinion, stuff you....(Not intended to offend anyone who does care just my oppinion.)
a 10-year-old playing games wouldn't have been surprising.
Me and my brother played games when we were five. I played T rated games when I was 6 cause I thought E rated games where generally retarded 3 year old games. I didn't understand, any, of that post, lol.
No kidding. "Was simple gaming better, or are you a story in games fan?" What the Hell kind of question is that? Story-wise, something like Unreal Tournament Foo has about as much story as the booklet that came with a Berzerk cartridge
That part can not be more true, you are 100% right. I do not agree with the other part cause I have never played either...
Slashdot Mirror
To clarify, I meant when I was 8 not 5.
I was playing M games when I was 5 I am a good person and I have good parents, so anyone who says thats wrong, in my opinion, stuff you....(Not intended to offend anyone who does care just my oppinion.)
Of course we all want to play LSL online that would be a BIG hit.(not) MMOsex, I do not think so. That was supposed to be funny I think, hehe.
Sssssssttttttttttoooooooooppppp ssssaaaaaaaayyyyyyyiiiiiiiinnnnngggggg ttttthhhhhhhhhhaaaattttttt.