Well that may be true I believe that their lawyers will only be paid for a win, as their firm is working partially on contingent terms. Sort of makes them want to make sure (however many) years it has been now, that they can make it pay off for them.
I imagine it's looking pretty desperate over there now.
Sorry I am not a lawyer, but it really does seem like an open and shut case of some one writing something in another country and being bound by another countries rules, because it was viewed by someone in Victoria.
I'm sure I'm in violation of many countries laws re:the internet, most probably china. Why is this case an exception?
Well as some one from New Zealand living in Oz ( and I quite like it, don't get me wrong ), who's law is also derived from the England, I can say Australian law concerning the internet has always been a bit backwards. It's not so much the unions, it is the government. I can say that's better than it was, but there have always been astounding decisions regarding the internet.
Slashdot Mirror
http://www.coffeeco.com.au/articles/sunbeamgrinder .html is a fantastic burr grinder at a very budget price but doesn't scrimp on quality.
Actually the site that I linked to does fantastic reviews by taking them apart and looking at the quality of all the components, he really knows his stuff.
Burr grinder comparison http://www.coffeeco.com.au/articles/september2002. html
Espresso machine comparisonhttp://www.coffeeco.com.au/articles/july 2002.html
Well that may be true I believe that their lawyers will only be paid for a win, as their firm is working partially on contingent terms. Sort of makes them want to make sure (however many) years it has been now, that they can make it pay off for them.
I imagine it's looking pretty desperate over there now.
Sorry, ignore that. Replied to the wrong thread.
Sorry I am not a lawyer, but it really does seem like an open and shut case of some one writing something in another country and being bound by another countries rules, because it was viewed by someone in Victoria. I'm sure I'm in violation of many countries laws re:the internet, most probably china. Why is this case an exception?
Well as some one from New Zealand living in Oz ( and I quite like it, don't get me wrong ), who's law is also derived from the England, I can say Australian law concerning the internet has always been a bit backwards. It's not so much the unions, it is the government. I can say that's better than it was, but there have always been astounding decisions regarding the internet.
1 13_text.html someone suing and winning against a publisher in another country (over defamation), but as it was viewed in Australia it was valid.
u ts-linking-on-notice/2006/12/19/1166290520771.html linking to copyrighted information is on notice.
http://www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/issues/v11n3/beyer
and even http://www.smh.com.au/news/web/copyright-ruling-p
The people and OMG the girls are amazing! the government,internet & prices are not not so much.