" If a large numbers of eyeballs is indeed the lure that causes criminals to write malware " Not very good to base your security practices on an IF! Just because the majority of hackers think this way, doesn't mean they all do. All it takes is one to say "I don't like Macs, I'm gonna hack it." And "boom goes the dynamite!"
It's the 'most people think this, So all people think this' mentality that ticks me off
Wow! Paranoid much?
Anyway. this crack has been out for over a year. (check the date on the article in the link) It was out when Vista was still just a release candidate. SP1 fixes this, but, of course, a new hack that SP1 does NOT fix was out before SP1 was released. Just can't keep up with those hackers!
Hey There Lumpy Tim!
As a web designer, what makes you an expert on US Law? I'm no expert either. But, I know how to click on a link (in this case one to the US treasury) and find out for myself if something is true, BEFORE making claims like yours. How can you make such strong "factual" statements when they are so obviously wrong? (by obvious I mean that one click of the mouse proves it wrong)
Something I'm unsure on here. It IS illegal to create the codecs and distribute them with out paying the licensing fees. But where does it say that it's illegal for us to use them? As far as I'm concerned I don't know weather the author paid royalties or not. How do I know if Microsoft paid or not. (I know it's obvious but still) I don't have to pay it myself so why is it illegal for me to use them?
You know what I don't get? How you can have this great discussion going on, Both sides bringing up valid and intelligent arguments. And then ruin the whole post by throwing in some juvenile cheap shot. You all do it, and it lessens the value of every point you made in your post. Why cant you just make you point and leave it at that. It's not just the Americans or just the Europeans doing it. It's all of you. Please, grow up!
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe those few selected devices paid Facebook to keep it that way. "Buy our phone it has Facebook Home"
If he wants to start fresh and leave his past behind. Shouldn't you, as a friend, respect that and leave him alone?
Doesn't "starting fresh" = "doesn't want to be found by you" ? So anonymous was correct!
In other words "We really have no idea what the chances are that life could evolve elsewhere. Nor what that life could be."
" If a large numbers of eyeballs is indeed the lure that causes criminals to write malware " Not very good to base your security practices on an IF! Just because the majority of hackers think this way, doesn't mean they all do. All it takes is one to say "I don't like Macs, I'm gonna hack it." And "boom goes the dynamite!" It's the 'most people think this, So all people think this' mentality that ticks me off
"But it IS a piece of Gosu!"
Ahhh! the true martian canals!
Besides, The movie was nearly 3 hours long as it was. Adding more for the other villains would have made it way too long!
It was Scarecrow. Joker broke him out of Arkham. Someone commented about it in the movie. (I don't remember if it was batman or Dent)
The comments on the dealbreaker.com article says it all about that topic!
Wow! Paranoid much? Anyway. this crack has been out for over a year. (check the date on the article in the link) It was out when Vista was still just a release candidate. SP1 fixes this, but, of course, a new hack that SP1 does NOT fix was out before SP1 was released. Just can't keep up with those hackers!
Hey There Lumpy Tim! As a web designer, what makes you an expert on US Law? I'm no expert either. But, I know how to click on a link (in this case one to the US treasury) and find out for myself if something is true, BEFORE making claims like yours. How can you make such strong "factual" statements when they are so obviously wrong? (by obvious I mean that one click of the mouse proves it wrong)
Looks like they may already have been hacked. I only get a blank page now when I go to their site!
Something I'm unsure on here. It IS illegal to create the codecs and distribute them with out paying the licensing fees. But where does it say that it's illegal for us to use them? As far as I'm concerned I don't know weather the author paid royalties or not. How do I know if Microsoft paid or not. (I know it's obvious but still) I don't have to pay it myself so why is it illegal for me to use them?
You know what I don't get? How you can have this great discussion going on, Both sides bringing up valid and intelligent arguments. And then ruin the whole post by throwing in some juvenile cheap shot. You all do it, and it lessens the value of every point you made in your post. Why cant you just make you point and leave it at that. It's not just the Americans or just the Europeans doing it. It's all of you. Please, grow up!
I wonder why they did this at all since China already had an Official Disney Theme park. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-09/1 2/content_477116.htm