What a joke, clearly this is a data mining project to track down people who spilled the beans before they committed crimes (or any act). The "time traveler" bullshit is just a cover story for the technology.
Chicxulub was not formed by a rock hitting Earth but by a massive electric discharge. Where we find falling rocks from space we don't find craters, where we find craters we don't find rocks fallen from space. Craters are not caused by rocks falling from space. Learn more at thunderbolts dot info.
Out of 10 pages, 1 was title and abstract, 1 was references, 2 were charts and images, 2 were the elaborate idea that a computer generated cartoon showing the sun in galactic arms during what are believed to have been extinction events somehow proves the assumption that "impacts" not only cause craters but that those craters also caused mass extinctions. While it is true that evidence suggests some craters' origins coincide with some extinctions, the evidence does not suggest those craters were caused by falling rocks from space. Overwhelmingly the evidence shows these craters were caused by electric discharge.
Out of 10 pages, 1 was title and abstract, 1 was references, 2 were images and charts, 2 were the elaborate claim that a cartoon they made on a computer places the sun in a galactic arm during periods believed to be mass extinctions which they quite spuriously attribute to "impacts". While evidence does suggest some historical extinctions correlate with known craters, the evidence does not suggest that these craters were caused by impacts. Overwhelmingly these craters are shown to have been caused by electric discharge.
This seems to be another case of science confirming what successful people already know. It's worth comparing the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to that of a typical office suite.
Plasma science has more than my bald assurance that it is valid. How about several nobel laureates and literally decades (longer than you've been alive to be sure) of experimental verification in the lab. Where is the experimental evidence supporting the self-compressing gas-ball stellar fusion model? We must simply accept on faith that all these processes occur just out of sight and using weird physics that only applies in the hearts of stars and can't be reproduced for study in the lab. Here's a tip, get a dictionary and look up the word "science". I do not think it means what you think it means.
Once this cycle is complete you have a chance to accept or reject your hypothesis. Astronogers routinely overlook this opportunity to correct their mistakes, instead choosing to reinforce each other's errors by trying to figure out how reality is lying to us and The Model is sacred.
I'm not sure how much they pay for hosting and web design or whatever, I'd guess more than $2, unless you're buying it by the minute or something. Here's a link to their "picture of the day" archive, as you can see they've been producing articles five days a week for three years: http://thunderbolts.info/tpod/00archive.htm
And a look at their pedigree: http://thunderbolts.info/team.htm
What exactly is "crackpot" about the idea that there is electricity in space and it actually does something? I think you need to close your bible and open your eyes to reality, this is the twenty-first century for fucks sake.
Actually a group of electrical theorists operating the Thunderbolts web site made several successful predictions regarding the "Deep Impact" mission. http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2005/arch05/0507 04predictions.htm
It's interesting to note that many of the successful predictions regarding this mission to a comet were "baffling" to professional astronogers who actually planned and carried out the mission. I give the "Deep Impact" team ten out of ten points for technical expertise, zero out of ten for their cartoonish expectations that flew in the face of the actual experimental results.
Here is an assessment of the predictions made by the Thunderbolts team: http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2005/arch05/0507 19deepinterim.htm
Here is a link to a Google search showing a pretty comprehensive pre- and post-event coverage of the mission, including many successful predictions that "surprised" astronogers and lots of analysis of the actual data from the experiment: http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&newwind ow=1&safe=off&q=site%3Athunderbolts.info+deep+impa ct+prediction&btnG=Search
What "bullshit" is it that you don't believe? Do you doubt that the sun's corona is plasma? Do you doubt that the affects of gravity on plasmas are negligible compared to the affects of electric and magnetic forces on the same plasmas? I think you have a lot of catching up to do before you can make informed posts on this issue. here, check out this web site hosted by Los Alamos and maintained by Anthony Peratt of Los Alamos National Laboratory: http://public.lanl.gov/alp/plasma/TheUniverse.html
Slashdot Mirror
Nice paranoiac rant, rain man.
What a joke, clearly this is a data mining project to track down people who spilled the beans before they committed crimes (or any act). The "time traveler" bullshit is just a cover story for the technology.
Electric arcs are more than adequate to pull material off a planet and into its own orbital trajectory.
Chicxulub was not formed by a rock hitting Earth but by a massive electric discharge. Where we find falling rocks from space we don't find craters, where we find craters we don't find rocks fallen from space. Craters are not caused by rocks falling from space. Learn more at thunderbolts dot info.
Are you suggesting the space station has no data connection with the ground?
I believe this is correct, it is a weakly disguised weapons platform and surveillance apparatus.
So they "responded" by saying "no comment". Dumb fuck!
Wow spaz obsess much about flying cars?
Same here in my beat-up 2004, looks like shit but gets in excess of 35mpg consistently, can't drive stupid though, speed limit or less all the way.
puts people, not ours people
You're all talking out your fucking assess, emphatically YES technology ours people out of work, as it should. We want fewer jobs, not MORE jobs.
Out of 10 pages, 1 was title and abstract, 1 was references, 2 were charts and images, 2 were the elaborate idea that a computer generated cartoon showing the sun in galactic arms during what are believed to have been extinction events somehow proves the assumption that "impacts" not only cause craters but that those craters also caused mass extinctions. While it is true that evidence suggests some craters' origins coincide with some extinctions, the evidence does not suggest those craters were caused by falling rocks from space. Overwhelmingly the evidence shows these craters were caused by electric discharge.
Out of 10 pages, 1 was title and abstract, 1 was references, 2 were images and charts, 2 were the elaborate claim that a cartoon they made on a computer places the sun in a galactic arm during periods believed to be mass extinctions which they quite spuriously attribute to "impacts". While evidence does suggest some historical extinctions correlate with known craters, the evidence does not suggest that these craters were caused by impacts. Overwhelmingly these craters are shown to have been caused by electric discharge.
This seems to be another case of science confirming what successful people already know. It's worth comparing the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to that of a typical office suite.
It's not lawyers we have to blame for this fiasco but the government itself. Government is a parasitic organism that we could all do without.
Plasma science has more than my bald assurance that it is valid. How about several nobel laureates and literally decades (longer than you've been alive to be sure) of experimental verification in the lab. Where is the experimental evidence supporting the self-compressing gas-ball stellar fusion model? We must simply accept on faith that all these processes occur just out of sight and using weird physics that only applies in the hearts of stars and can't be reproduced for study in the lab. Here's a tip, get a dictionary and look up the word "science". I do not think it means what you think it means.
...a solid body: http://thesurfaceofthesun.com/ ...the focus of an electric discharge, which powers it: http://www.electric-cosmos.org/sun.htm ...to be respected. The sun doesn't dodge bullets. Bullets dodge the sun. http://passthebrass.com/2005/12/chuck-norris-owns- you/
The Scientific Method
1. observe
2. hypothesize
3. predict
4. experiment
5. observe
Once this cycle is complete you have a chance to accept or reject your hypothesis. Astronogers routinely overlook this opportunity to correct their mistakes, instead choosing to reinforce each other's errors by trying to figure out how reality is lying to us and The Model is sacred.
Excuse me while i die laughing...
Please do, the sooner the better.
Fortunately it takes more than your bald assurance to invalidate a scientific concept.
I'm not sure how much they pay for hosting and web design or whatever, I'd guess more than $2, unless you're buying it by the minute or something. Here's a link to their "picture of the day" archive, as you can see they've been producing articles five days a week for three years: http://thunderbolts.info/tpod/00archive.htm And a look at their pedigree: http://thunderbolts.info/team.htm
I guess slashdot is now a forum for wet-assed whiners who cry when they don't get their way.
What exactly is "crackpot" about the idea that there is electricity in space and it actually does something? I think you need to close your bible and open your eyes to reality, this is the twenty-first century for fucks sake.
Actually a group of electrical theorists operating the Thunderbolts web site made several successful predictions regarding the "Deep Impact" mission. http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2005/arch05/0507 04predictions.htm
It's interesting to note that many of the successful predictions regarding this mission to a comet were "baffling" to professional astronogers who actually planned and carried out the mission. I give the "Deep Impact" team ten out of ten points for technical expertise, zero out of ten for their cartoonish expectations that flew in the face of the actual experimental results.
Here is an assessment of the predictions made by the Thunderbolts team: http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2005/arch05/0507 19deepinterim.htm
Here is a link to a Google search showing a pretty comprehensive pre- and post-event coverage of the mission, including many successful predictions that "surprised" astronogers and lots of analysis of the actual data from the experiment: http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&newwind ow=1&safe=off&q=site%3Athunderbolts.info+deep+impa ct+prediction&btnG=Search
What "bullshit" is it that you don't believe? Do you doubt that the sun's corona is plasma? Do you doubt that the affects of gravity on plasmas are negligible compared to the affects of electric and magnetic forces on the same plasmas? I think you have a lot of catching up to do before you can make informed posts on this issue. here, check out this web site hosted by Los Alamos and maintained by Anthony Peratt of Los Alamos National Laboratory: http://public.lanl.gov/alp/plasma/TheUniverse.html