Slashdot Mirror


Ceiling Height May Affect Problem-Solving Skills

An anonymous reader writes to mention that a recent University of Minnesota study suggests that ceiling height may affect problem-solving skills. "'When people are in a room with a high ceiling, they activate the idea of freedom. In a low-ceilinged room, they activate more constrained, confined concepts.' Either can be good. The concept of freedom promotes information processing that encourages greater variation in the kinds of thoughts one has, said Meyers-Levy, professor of marketing at the University of Minnesota. The concept of confinement promotes more detail-oriented processing."

279 comments

  1. Glass Ceilings by TheCouchPotatoFamine · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously, they're doing it wrong.

    --
    CS majors know the time/space tradeoff, but they never get taught the 3rd, crucial, tradeoff of the set: comprehension!
    1. Re:Glass Ceilings by ThePromenader · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Ceiling Height May Affects Problem-Solving Skills"

      Whoever wrote that headline must have a low ceiling.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    2. Re:Glass Ceilings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Your company wont remove your ceiling. You need your ceiling to keep the people who
      are on higher floors from falling on your head. The only exception is the people on
      the top floor of your building ie ... the ones who ordered your cubicle be taken away. Teyll
      keep there ceilings too, because all the discomforts that make regular employees more
      productive are exactly the kinds of things that make senior executives less productive.
      No one knows why.

      I think the next wave of office design will focus on eliminating the only remaining obstacle to office productivity: your happiness. Happiness isn't a physical thing, like walls and doors. But it's closely related. Managers know that if they can eliminate all traces of happiness, the employees won't be so picky about their physical surroundings. Once you're hopelessly unhappy, you won't bother to complain if your boss rolls you up in a tight ball and crams you into a cardboard box.
      joy of work dilbert by scott adams

    3. Re:Glass Ceilings by megaditto · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Feminists got it all wrong. Glass ceilings in high-rise office buildings are all about female empowerment!

      Where else can a woman get men to look up to her by simply showing up in a skirt?

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  2. May affects? by patternmatch · · Score: 5, Funny

    It may affects grammar skills too.

    1. Re:May affects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > It may affects grammar skills too.

      Ceiling cat is watching you... WTF? To lolcats?!

    2. Re:May affects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little quality control here, please. Two grammatical mistakes in three posts from ScuttleMonkey seems to indicate the need for a little more proofreading... ...or a higher ceiling.

    3. Re:May affects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the grammar complaint line? C'mon, guys, change it already. Us'n 'puter folk can speak good, too.

    4. Re:May affects? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Where is the problem? The ceiling height May (obviously not every May is a ceiling height May; I wonder what's special about those, and if May 2007 is one) affects problem-solving skills (i.e. whenever we have a ceiling height May, the problem-solving skills are either increased or reduced significantly).

      Given the amount of spelling errors on Slashdot lately, I guess May 2007 is a ceiling height may, and it actually reduces at least the skill of solving the problem "is this spelled correctly?"

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    5. Re:May affects? by enjerth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Two grammatical mistakes in three posts from ScuttleMonkey seems to indicate the need for a little more proofreading... ...or a higher ceiling. The article suggests a higher ceiling may inspire free thought, while a lower ceiling may promote attention to detail. So he needs a lower ceiling.
    6. Re:May affects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I could come to work drunk.

    7. Re:May affects? by neverpsyked · · Score: 1

      In other words, before attempting to exercise your grammar nazi skills in a witty and seemingly humorous manner, RTFA.

      --
      What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
    8. Re:May affects? by avonhungen · · Score: 1

      You mean given the number of errors? ;-) its a slippery slope, that grammar correction thing...

  3. Perfect by ls+-la · · Score: 2, Funny

    I blame the extra-short ceiling on my floor for less-than-perfect grades freshman year!

    1. Re:Perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to call up your lawyer! You live in America, right?

    2. Re:Perfect by orangesquid · · Score: 3, Funny

      What about outdoors versus indoors?

      Ancient greek philosophers wandered around outside a lot, so the stories go. I'm curious about where lawmakers did their work, traditionally; probably inside buildings, but how high were the ceilings?
      I checked the latest revision of wikipedia's page on Ancient Greek law (as of the time of posting this comment) to see if there were any pictures of ancient Greek law buildings, but, there were only references to "Ancient Greek poop" and "Roman crap." This could be symbolically indicative of legislatures in low-ceiling buildings, but I suspect it's just random vandalism...

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    3. Re:Perfect by watergeus · · Score: 1

      "...Ancient greek philosophers wandered around outside a lot..."

      No, they walked. They walked in the atrium(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atrium_(archit ecture)) what is inside.
      They walked in an area with shade and good echo's. They walked around the patio(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patio) (2th picture, the definition is crappy), in fact they walked the 'corredor' as it is called in Latin-America. There is a very clear link between the Moors (Arabs, North-Africans), Spain (Alhambra(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alhambra)) (spectacular!) and the classic houses in Latin America (go see Antigua/Guatemala, Granada/Nicaragua and Cartagena/Colombia).

      To put this research in a practical perspective.

      When you have an important speech to make:

      Take a walk in the woods with no dog and no gun.
      Do your speech on the rhythm of your walking.
      Your real speech will be much better.

    4. Re:Perfect by darkciti · · Score: 1

      Actually this makes perfect biological sense. Children are significantly shorter than adults and their brains are developmental during those years.

    5. Re:Perfect by Hyperspite · · Score: 1

      Um, I think that's completely unrelated. As a wild guess, the selective pressure that made the ceiling thing happen is probably that humans are by default broad thinkers, but when you're in a tight situation, like climbing through trees, running through a forest, surrounded by a crowd, or what have you, you need to pay attention to the things around you. People who didn't pay attention to the missing branch/low branch/menacing stares were.... selected out.

    6. Re:Perfect by kenjishikida · · Score: 1

      what about raining and not raining? ;-)

      --
      [] Leonardo Kenji Shikida
  4. fascinating by spykemail · · Score: 1

    Fascinating, companies that do creative work should take note and think about high ceilings for creative office spaces in the future. On the other hand, looks like the detail oriented rank and file will always be stuck in Dilbert Land.

    1. Re:fascinating by garcia · · Score: 0, Troll

      Fascinating, companies that do creative work should take note and think about high ceilings for creative office spaces in the future. On the other hand, looks like the detail oriented rank and file will always be stuck in Dilbert Land.

      Because all people are exactly alike and should be treated as such because of a study... Right. I don't let my workspace limit my creativity in any way. I'm able to output the same quality of work regardless of the environment. This is just another pointless (and several days old) study that shouldn't have graced the front page of Slashdot.

    2. Re:fascinating by ResidntGeek · · Score: 1

      Why the hell would you just dismiss a conclusion automatically for no reason at all? Empirical observation says, in all likelihood, your workspace does limit your creativity in some way. It's not like the study participants were deliberately choosing to be more detail-oriented when the ceiling was short.

      --
      ResidntGeek
    3. Re:fascinating by thousandinone · · Score: 1

      Correlation does not necessarily mean a cause and effect relationship.

    4. Re:fascinating by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Even if your work environment required that you work upside down? I don't even think the effects would be something that most people would notice. More of a subconscious effect.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:fascinating by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Informative

      But it does give you a damn good idea of where to start looking. Correlation doesn't PROVE causation, but it sure as hell implies it.

    6. Re:fascinating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why the hell would you just dismiss a conclusion automatically for no reason at all? Empirical observation says, in all likelihood, your workspace does limit your creativity in some way. It's not like the study participants were deliberately choosing to be more detail-oriented when the ceiling was short.

      Absolutely! As a matter of fact, since I've been posting on /., my income has dropped $122,000 US!

      So, pay up asshole, you're at fault!!

    7. Re:fascinating by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Duh!

      Obviously, He dismisses it because he works in an office with 7' cielings.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    8. Re:fascinating by fitten · · Score: 1

      I don't let my workspace limit my creativity in any way. I'm able to output the same quality of work regardless of the environment.


      Got some links to your data that you've gathered and your study of that data? How's about we put you in a 1m x 1m x 1m box and see how your creativity changes.
    9. Re:fascinating by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      Correlation doesn't PROVE causation,

      I see that maxim quoted a lot these days. I see the point it's making, of course; but I can't help wondering: what does prove causation, then?

    10. Re:fascinating by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Correlation doesn't PROVE causation,

      I see that maxim quoted a lot these days. I see the point it's making, of course; but I can't help wondering: what does prove causation, then?

      If a phenomenon is observed only when something is present but never when it is not, a causal relationship can reasonably be construed. The other point is, at least in science, nothing is ever proven!
      --
      P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
    11. Re:fascinating by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Nothing proves it, but you can get pretty close by running a controlled experiment and removing a lot of confounding variables.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    12. Re:fascinating by topherhenk · · Score: 3, Funny

      How's about we put you in a 1m x 1m x 1m box and see how your creativity changes. Hey, you can't use my office for this study.
    13. Re:fascinating by adminstring · · Score: 0

      Although causality in the real world can never be proven, it is very useful to act as though causality exists.

      People who act as if causality does not exist cannot effectively manipulate their environments to achieve desired results. We tend to call such people insane.

      Therefore causality is useful, and (following the reasoning of William James) that means it's "true" to the best extent that anything in the real world ever can be.

      --
      My truck is like a series of tubes.
    14. Re:fascinating by hackerdownunder · · Score: 0

      In order for correlation to come close to proving causation, the correlation must be both Necessary AND Sufficient.

    15. Re:fascinating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who act as if causality does not exist cannot effectively manipulate their environments to achieve desired results. We tend to call such people insane.

      Are you suggesting that disbelief in causality causes insanity?

    16. Re:fascinating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly wrong. By that logic smoke causes fire, which is exactly the fallacy "correlation does not imply causation" is meant to warn you against.

      To show causation in the scientific community, you do an experiment. You have a control condition and a test condition and ensure as best you've set them up to be identical except for a certain difference.

      For example, you could set up three piles of wood: one with nothing, one on fire, and one with some smoke added. Noticing that the fire condition elicits smoke while the smoke condition does not elicit fire is evidence that fire causes smoke.

    17. Re:fascinating by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

      I see that maxim quoted a lot these days. I see the point it's making, of course; but I can't help wondering: what does prove causation, then?

      The warm fuzzy feeling you get from a study whose results you do like.

    18. Re:fascinating by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      That's probably the most insightful answer that's been posted; thanks :-)

    19. Re:fascinating by ResidntGeek · · Score: 1

      Causation is reasonably proven when a theory is proposed which states a causal relationship, and the theory is verified by experiment. To take the example of smoke and fire given above: once the atomic theory reached the level of support it has now in the early 20th century, a theory of combustion could be proposed, involving oxidation and the production of small solid particles. Then, various means such as measuring partial pressure of oxygen before and after combustion, capturing and analyzing smoke particles, decomposing combustion products, and etc. could be used to demonstrate the practical usefulness and physical accuracy of the theory. The modern theory of combustion has been verified so many times by so many experiments that it can be considered proven, so that we can be quite sure fire causes smoke.

      --
      ResidntGeek
    20. Re:fascinating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read it as implying that insanity correlates with a disbelief in causation :)

    21. Re:fascinating by jlehtira · · Score: 1

      It also helps if you consider the order of things happening, either observed or deduced. If a phenomenon is observed after something, every time after something and never otherwise, it's probably causation.

      The direction of the causation can sometimes be deduced reasonably too. It's rather logical to say that the Chicxulub meteor killed the dinosaurs, rather than the other way around! Even when we don't really have evidence from meteors causing extinction.

    22. Re:fascinating by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 1

      The direction of the causation can sometimes be deduced reasonably too. It's rather logical to say that the Chicxulub meteor killed the dinosaurs, rather than the other way around! Even when we don't really have evidence from meteors causing extinction. Clearly you've never heard of the Giant-Meteor-Attracting Dinosaur Hypothesis, which elucidates the greatest example of an evolutionary dead-end (hah!). After all, we haven't had a giant meteor hit the earth and wipe out most life since those particular dinosaurs were annihilated. The only dinosaurs we have left are the birds, which are of course giant-meteor-repelling.
      --
      P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
    23. Re:fascinating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm able to output the same quality of work regardless of the environment. Yup. Shit is shit, now matter where you pitch it. Good one, Dopebrain.
    24. Re:fascinating by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      [...] in science, nothing is ever proven
      Actually in formal sciences, like mathematics and logic, things get proven all the time.
    25. Re:fascinating by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 1

      Actually in formal sciences, like mathematics and logic, things get proven all the time. I think the discussion was pertaining more to what might be referred to as the natural sciences, guided as they are by the scientific method and the understanding that our ability to measure something is necessarily finite and imperfect. With all due respect to mathematicians, they cheerfully argue over imaginary numbers and things that, to a non-mathematician such as myself, seem dreadfully close to mental masturbation. I have a great respect for mathematicians, who are capable of mental feats of which I'm quite incapable, but I often fail to see how "proving" relationships between primes (or some other feat of reasoning) contributes to the practical understanding of the universe.
      --
      P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
    26. Re:fascinating by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1
      I was just nit-picking, of course. Correlation is a part of statistics, which is a branch of mathematics, hence my remark.

      As to the importance of mathematical proof: mathematics is the basis on which other sciences like physics are built. Each time you use a certain formula in physics, it's important to know under which conditions that formula is valid. Mathematical proof can establish if this is always the case or only for certain strictly defined conditions. You can prove mathematically that a certain structure (say, a bridge) will not collapse under it's own weight. I agree with you that much of mathematics is a purely mental exercise, but that doesn't mean it can't be a basis for something practical. It's for example highly useful to have mathematical proof that a certain cryptographic algorithm doesn't have hidden weaknesses. And imaginary numbers can be pretty useful in electrical engineering.

    27. Re:fascinating by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 1

      As to the importance of mathematical proof: mathematics is the basis on which other sciences like physics are built...I agree with you that much of mathematics is a purely mental exercise, but that doesn't mean it can't be a basis for something practical. I must certainly agree with your excellent points. Mathematics is important for understanding many aspects of chemistry and biology, and my experience with physics was one primarily characterised by my struggle with the mathematics. When it comes to applied math, I tend to think of engineering, computer-based science (modelling, cryptography, etc.) and physics. I'm rather interested to hear that imaginary numbers are useful in EE, as I'd previously assumed that they existed more as a consequence of mathematics rather than a tool. I'll have to make a note to look that up when I have more time. Thanks for an informative reply!
      --
      P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
  5. Interesting Thought by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wealthier individuals with the larger home... does the environment itself produce children who are less restricted in their thinking?

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Interesting Thought by RiskyChris · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wealth likely has a larger, more dominating influence on a growing individual than the height of any given room.

    2. Re:Interesting Thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm from poor home and I am very creative and original, you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:Interesting Thought by tedgyz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wealthier individuals with the larger home... does the environment itself produce children who are less restricted in their thinking? Ummm... Paris Hilton? She's not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed.
      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    4. Re:Interesting Thought by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Amazing how folks' minds go to Paris. I would argue her thinking is not restricted at all. This does not translate into "intelligent".

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    5. Re:Interesting Thought by cowscows · · Score: 1

      Just because someone has a giant house doesn't necessarily mean that it's better designed. The "McMansion" system of home building results in high-square footage numbers, but not always higher quality spaces. Adding a third story of 8' high rooms will likely add a lot more to the sale value of a house compared to the construction cost than raising all of the ceiling heights a few feet.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    6. Re:Interesting Thought by inviolet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wealthier individuals with the larger home... does the environment itself produce children who are less restricted in their thinking?

      Now think even broader than that. What will the effect be of the grand and unprecedented social experiment, conducted over the past two decades, of raising children almost continuously confined indoors?

      The farther back in history you go, the more time everyone spent outdoors, in which there was no ceiling. Perhaps this explains some small part of the modern retreat from independence.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    7. Re:Interesting Thought by jmashaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "The concept of confinement promotes more detail-oriented processing." Except that less restricted thinking does not always lead to wealth. Sometimes the people who are the most detail oriented are better prepared to handle the rigors of society. I can't imagine that you would prefer a open-thinking surgeon to one who is going to make sure that every stitch inside and out is perfect.

    8. Re:Interesting Thought by tedgyz · · Score: 1

      Amazing how folks' minds go to Paris. I would argue her thinking is not restricted at all. This does not translate into "intelligent". Good point. I guess I was looking at it from the angle of free thinking put to good use or to bad use. Being a celebutard isn't very useful to society, except for being the poster child of the rich and stupid.
      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    9. Re:Interesting Thought by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      Amazing how folks' minds go to Paris. I would argue her thinking is not restricted at all. This does not translate into "intelligent". Yet she is incredibly successful. Her goal is to be famous, nothing more than that. There are plenty of extremely wealthy people who would like to be famous but haven't achieved the level of fame she has (bet you can't even name one such person, see?) Yet here we are talking about her on website which wouldn't normally even acknowledge her existence.

      Certainly this latest bruhaha with her arrest/sentencing is giving her fame beyond anything that money can normally buy. Can we even be sure that it wasn't all a stunt anyway - 45 days in a minimum security celebrity jail in exchange for a week or two of constant news coverage is a good trade off when your goal is simply to be famous, although you might consider it to be "thinking inside the box" at least for 45 days...
    10. Re:Interesting Thought by mistermiyagi · · Score: 0

      "The concept of confinement promotes more detail-oriented processing." Except that less restricted thinking does not always lead to wealth. Sometimes the people who are the most detail oriented are better prepared to handle the rigors of society. I can't imagine that you would prefer a open-thinking surgeon to one who is going to make sure that every stitch inside and out is perfect."

      Could you argue that because surgeons (if they do) train in smaller rooms that they are almost always more detail oriented?

    11. Re:Interesting Thought by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Paris Hilton's going to jail? I knew there was a reason I stopped watching non-DVR TV.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    12. Re:Interesting Thought by Unique2 · · Score: 1

      She is definitely not one encumbered by the burden of thought.

      --
      No trees were harmed in the posting of this message. However, a great number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
    13. Re:Interesting Thought by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Amazing how folks' minds go to Paris. I would argue her thinking is not restricted at all. This does not translate into "intelligent". Well when you talk about restricted thinking you actually imply that some thinking occurs.

      So Paris Hilton is a very poor example. ;)
    14. Re:Interesting Thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paris is a perfect example. She doesn't realize she's not a hell of a lot bigger than she thinks she is!

    15. Re:Interesting Thought by rapidweather · · Score: 1
      Paris Hilton is a feast for the geek's eyes, and we probably don't need to hear what she has to say.


      I did look at her MySpace page, it seems that there was a petition asking Gov. Schwarzenegger to pardon her so she won't have to go to jail, and apparently Paris herself decided to thank the individual involved by posting a "thank-you" on her page. She misspelled "sign", when asking people to "sign" the petition.

      It's gone now, the MySpace page is a horrible excuse for a web page, someone needs to clean up the page, perhaps by cutting off the public's right to post there, just leaving posts cleared by a kind and caring webmaster that can turn the page into something not so out-of-control.

      With so many talented webmaster types here at Slashdot, I'm sure some of you would like to somehow contact Ms. Hilton, offering your help in her time of need.

      I probably could work the assignment in somehow, but I'll go ahead and let some of you cut in line ahead of me, being the nice fellow that I am.


      I do play with GIMP, and I have a "Wallpaper Control Center" application in my Knoppix remaster that has a section where one can, at the touch of a button, download and install a desktop wallpaper directly from my rapidweather.com/images directory. One of them is a nice picture of Paris Hilton. I do it that way so I can change the "downloadable" wallpapers, all the others are in the CD, and are fixed.
      Check the "screenshots" link, below for a screenshot of the "Wallpaper Control Center".


      The application is basically for managing right clicked web images for wallpaper purposes, sizing them to a particular desktop, and saving them for future use, within a "livecd linux" environment. If the user downloads too many images and tries to apply one, the application will take notice and guide the user through a fix, where extra images are easily moved from the active "desktop wallpaper" area, where they can be managed. Almost impossible to fowl it up without the application asking questions, and arranging for fixes. Very easy to do, so if one comes across a batch of web images that you want for your desktop, download all you want, then start the control center by clicking on the IceWM toolbar icon. Much faster processing of these downloaded images than with KDE, for instance.
      Here is the url for the Paris wallpaper image:

      http://www.rapidweather.com/images/sample6.jpg

      I can't link to it here, you'll get a Forbidden error, but you may copy the link and go there directly in your browser. To see the others, enter "sample1.jpg, etc. (There are six 1024x768 images, all produced using GIMP)

             

    16. Re:Interesting Thought by WilliamSChips · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interestingly, the best surgeons appear to be the ones who played a lot of video games as a child.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    17. Re:Interesting Thought by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      (bet you can't even name one such person, see?)
      Bono, perhaps? And he's actually trying to put his wealth and superstar status to good use.
      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    18. Re:Interesting Thought by zCyl · · Score: 1

      Amazing how folks' minds go to Paris. I would argue her thinking is not restricted at all.

      According to the news, she will soon be experiencing some lower ceilings for a month or two. Perhaps this will constrain her future thinking a little more.
    19. Re:Interesting Thought by etheranger · · Score: 2, Funny

      Amazing how folks' minds go to Paris. I would argue her thinking is not restricted at all. In fact, I would argue she is unrestricted by thinking!
    20. Re:Interesting Thought by dcam · · Score: 1

      Amazing how folks' minds go to Paris. I would argue her thinking is not restricted at all. This does not translate into "intelligent".


      I think you would have to make a case for her thinking at all before we could argue that one.
      --
      meh
  6. Fairly valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would pretty much agree - if I am in a big high ceilinged room then I can stare up into it and use the space to "create" - if the ceiling is 2 foot above my head I am rammed in, less likely to look up, and generally will be confined to thinking detail of whatever was running through my mind.

  7. Maybe... by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can buy the idea that the ceiling tends to stifle my creativity, but I think the chain attaching me to my desk and the guy who comes around every 15 minutes with the whip probably don't help either. And if all that weren't bad enough, they haven't changed the variety of snacks in the snack machine in like 3 years. There has to be something in the Geneva Conventions about that.

    1. Re:Maybe... by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whether the variety of snacks has changed in the last 3 years is not my concern, but rather if the snacks themselves have changed in the last 3 years. You've never had old chewing gum until you've cut your gums on a stick shard.

      Of course, we certainly know the working evironment can be too opulent as well. I'm looking at you, Ion Storm

      --
      Demented But Determined.
    2. Re:Maybe... by Brigadier · · Score: 2, Funny



      snack !!! you have snacks ?!?!? and a chair!?!?!

    3. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I can buy the idea that the ceiling tends to stifle my creativity, but I think the chain attaching me to my desk and the guy who comes around every 15 minutes with the whip probably don't help either.

      Same here, except I married a woman.

      Oh wait, you were talking about work?

    4. Re:Maybe... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Your computer has internet access?

    5. Re:Maybe... by Brigadier · · Score: 2, Funny



      yea, but only when I pedal extra hard and hold these rabbit ears at 45 degrees above my head, while whistling binaries tones into this set of tin can and strings.

    6. Re:Maybe... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      I know it's not much, but if it makes you feel any better: I LOVED Madden 2006.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    7. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know there's a good point behind that quip. Ceiling height may merely be indicative of the way an employer regards his/her staff.

    8. Re:Maybe... by nschubach · · Score: 1

      At least they didn't take away your pedals too. :(

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    9. Re:Maybe... by smegged · · Score: 1

      You have a snack machine. At my work it's fingernails or starve.

  8. I don't quite get it... by Lockejaw · · Score: 0

    I can't even see it when I'm working -- I look at my screen, not at the ceiling.

    --
    (IANAL)
    1. Re:I don't quite get it... by u-bend · · Score: 1

      ...and you'd be a good candidate for the low ceiling crowd ;)

      --
      u-bend
    2. Re:I don't quite get it... by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      I think these guys should do a study on the effect of monitor size on creativity, so I can show it to my boss. Were it that the relationship was superlinear! One can dream...

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    3. Re:I don't quite get it... by Lockejaw · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about creativity, but I'd say having a larger (or second) monitor definitely improves productivity.

      --
      (IANAL)
  9. Ceiling Height May Affects Grammar Skills by hexed_2050 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think you made a mistake in the title.

    From the title "Ceiling Height May Affects Problem-Solving Skills"

    Should be "Ceiling Height May Affects Grammar Skills"

    h

    --
    Valkyrie is about to die! Wizard needs food -- badly!
    1. Re:Ceiling Height May Affects Grammar Skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you meant "Ceiling Height May Effects Grammar Skills"

    2. Re:Ceiling Height May Affects Grammar Skills by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Hey, at least he didn't say "effects". A guy's entitled to a mulligan for a simple fatfinger.

      rj

  10. Just work outside by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Telecommuting from the lawn chair is why wifi was invented.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Just work outside by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      That was my thought as well. If I need to think about a difficult problem, I go for a stroll around the park. The 'ceiling' is infinitely high there...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Just work outside by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Got a 7.3 from the Russian judge?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    3. Re:Just work outside by cultrhetor · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, you rate judge!
      No. If you cannot repeat a tired, useless joke setup correctly, please spare us the attempt.
      --
      "Tu fui, ego eris" - Virgil
    4. Re:Just work outside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, only lame joke setup attempts from old Korean men spare you!

    5. Re:Just work outside by trentblase · · Score: 1

      stroll around the park. The 'ceiling' is infinitely high there Although some hypothesize that humans perceive the sky as a flattened bowl type surface (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_illusion)
    6. Re:Just work outside by simm1701 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes..

      Until you start to sky dive

      No I'm not being sarcastic I'm serious.

      After sky diving regularly (to the point of being licensed and in control of yourself in the air) you start to look at the sky differently. It ceases to be just something that is there, instead its a medium that is yours, you can move with it in, you feel as though you have an extra degree of freedom - its changes your perspective.

      I'm told many pilots and other aerial sports people feel the same way - ditto for divers and the water.

      --
      $_="Slashdotter";$syn="OTT";s;..;;;sub _{print shift||$_};s!ash!Perl !;s=$syn=ack=i;tr+LLEd+BLAH+;_"Just Another ";_
  11. nice to hear some confirmation by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    i always felt less constrained mentally in a high-ceiling space. It's nice to see that there might be a biological or scientific explanation besides, "surely you must be joking, Dr. 192939495969798999!"

    --
    stuff |
  12. Science by pete-classic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "professor of marketing"

    Is marketing a Science now?

    -Peter

    1. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is pseudo-science, junk science...
      Move along...

    2. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, never knew a professor has to be of a branch of science! Then again, I am not from USA.

    3. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marketer: Check out this building!

      You: What a waste of space! I could fit in 8 more floors and waste less money on heating and air conditioning...

      Marketer: Yes, yes, but research is being conducted by neuroscience experts and experimental psychologists which can prove high ceilings to be able to activate your employees' Freedom of Thought(tm)! What bold initiatives your managers will be able to unlock in a vast emptiness rivaling that of their heads! Might I also interest you in these ultra-hi-power ceiling fans, which utilize similar advanced vapour-thrusting technologies as those used in the engines of commercial airliners?

    4. Re:Science by RockoTDF · · Score: 1

      While there may be some "junk" in the conclusions the study is drawing, it is hard to argue with a correlation. Which as many other posters have correctly pointed out does NOT imply causation.

      --
      There is more to science than physics!

      www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
    5. Re:Science by RockoTDF · · Score: 1

      The first rule of science is that it can only disprove, and can never prove for sure. Nothing is ever proven. I think too many are missing the point that this is a correlational study and not a proper experiment, ergo you cannot truly imply directional causality.

      --
      There is more to science than physics!

      www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
    6. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While there may be some "junk" in the conclusions the study is drawing, it is hard to argue with a correlation. Which as many other posters have correctly pointed out does NOT imply causation.

      WTF are you saying????

    7. Re:Science by fireylord · · Score: 0

      Of course!

      Marketing spin doctor types would tell you that 'it's the science of language synergy, combined with the art of media manipulation!' Or something.

    8. Re:Science by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know about the USA, but here in Germany, Professor is a title you get only on universities, which very much implies a branch of science. On the other hand, in Austria every teacher gets this title. So what "professor" means obviously depends very much on where you are.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    9. Re:Science by Bearhouse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Slow down, Pete... from /.'s favourite source:

      'The meaning of the word professor (Latin: "one who claims publicly to be an expert") varies. In most English-speaking countries, it refers to a senior academic who holds a departmental chair, generally as head of the department, or a personal chair awarded specifically to that individual.' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professor

      I've worked with some top-level marketing guys. Can't comment on the 'pure marketing' stuff, but I'm not too shabby at applied statistics, (post-doc level), and some of these guys were, within their specialisation, very impressive, (survey design, etc.). Think that qualifies as 'science'... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science

      Less convincing is why a marketing 'prof' would be credible about creativity, which one would assume should be more in the domain of applied psychologists.

    10. Re:Science by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      The Slashdot topic of this story is "Science". Do you have Slashdot topics in your country?

      -Peter

    11. Re:Science by iapetus · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's saying that it may be the problem-solving skills that are making the ceiling higher.

      Probably.

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    12. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well yes. But lets not go on a tangent here.

      Tell me if you do not agree to this definition (among many similar ones) - from MW:

      Main Entry: professor
      Pronunciation: pr&-'fe-s&r
      Function: noun
      1 : one that professes , avows, or declares
      2 a : a faculty member of the highest academic rank at an institution of higher education
          b : a teacher at a university, college, or sometimes secondary school
          c : one that teaches or professes special knowledge of an art, sport, or occupation requiring skill

    13. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The science of marketing is, among other things, applied statistics, psychology, economics, industrial engineering (logistics, operational research, ...) and organizational research, with the goal of sustainable, measurable and predictable bussiness success. Pretty much what others have said already.

    14. Re:Science by martinX · · Score: 1

      I can sell you a report on that very subject!

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    15. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is golf a sport?

    16. Re:Science by RockoTDF · · Score: 1

      What I'm saying is there is no point in arguing with whether or not a correlation exists, because apparently it does.

      --
      There is more to science than physics!

      www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
  13. On a more serious note by ls+-la · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From TFA:

    In one test subjects were more critical of a product's design flaws when evaluation took place in a shorter room. This result could have important implications for retailers.
    I wonder how many stores are going to see this and move to a larger, more spacious facility like most Barnes and Noble and Best Buy stores I see. Personally
    1. Re:On a more serious note by ls+-la · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oops, wrong button...

      Personally, I wouldn't mind a more spacious store. They should do a study that shows people prefer aisles wide enough to walk through.

    2. Re:On a more serious note by 0rionx · · Score: 4, Funny

      1. Write up an interesting comment
      2. "Accidentally" cut it into two separate posts
      3. ???
      4. Karma!

  14. Finally! by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...I can now justify my smoke breaks as "more creative thinking" time! Sweet! (no ceiling out back where I pollute my lungs... :) )

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Finally! by sjwest · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm tall, and love to stretch - so im leaving the employment of the seven dwarfs..... ok snow white is cute but those bloody songs

    2. Re:Finally! by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      You should be modded insightful..(understable since you get more space on your breaks)
      Those modding you funny, must have low ceilings.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
  15. Cubicles by snoyberg · · Score: 1

    I would imagine the same argument could be made for cubicles. You know, the claustrophobic kind...

    --
    Thank God for evolution.
    1. Re:Cubicles by Radon360 · · Score: 1

      No, that would be thinking outside the box...

    2. Re:Cubicles by kalirion · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the affect of ceiling height is because of claustrophobia as well. Would ideas thought of in a very tall closed be any better than ideas in a large room with a low ceiling?

  16. Ah, modern psychology research by idontgno · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wasn't aware that cognitive psychology was a branch of marketing.

    That's like saying that automotive engineering is an offshoot of ricer tuning. (To coin a car analogy)

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    1. Re:Ah, modern psychology research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, marketing is a subset of psychology.

      You know, like set theory is a subset of math?

  17. TPS reports by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Funny

    Umm, we just read a report that ceiling height affects detail-oriented thinking. Mmmkay? So, I'm gonna have to ask you to mount this sheet of plywood across the top of your cubicle. If you could just take care of that, that'd be really great.

    1. Re:TPS reports by slayermet420 · · Score: 1

      I can hear the voice and everything. And even worse, I can see some dimwitted boss using this study as justification to do that.

      --
      Geeks strike again 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:TPS reports by kungfujesus · · Score: 1

      I GOT THE MEMO

  18. That's why... by vga_init · · Score: 1

    God made us a high ceiling (the atmosphere)
    He wants us to be free

    lol

    1. Re:That's why... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Joseph Campbell (the guy that inspired George Lucas in developing the Star Wars mythos) used to talk about places of worship having high ceilings for that reason, to draw you up to the sky.

  19. Hmmm by KKlaus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Interesting, and not altogether surprising when you think about it, but I suspect the researchers are being a little to narrow minded about this (maybe they need higher ceilings). I think it's pretty reasonable to suspect (although I obviously don't have the data to prove it) that a wide variety of environments influence human thinking in non-subtle ways. I can imagine people being more or less optimistic depending on how white (color, not race just to head that one off...) their surroundings are, or more ecofriendly depending on how urban their surroundings are. I can at least speak from personal experience that I find myself less likely to speak my mind when I am in rooms where the walls are nearly all glass, where perhaps the underlying mechanism is one of being overly watched or scrutinized. Either way, I always appreciate studies that show a link between quality of work environment and quality of performance (which is what this essentially is). Here's to the death of stuffy and suffocating rooms!

    --
    Relax I just want some peanuts.
    1. Re:Hmmm by ml10422 · · Score: 1

      I remember reading about a study that said simply changing something about your employees' environment once in a while will make them happier and more productive.

  20. I'd normally come up with a witty comment by CaptainPatent · · Score: 4, Funny

    But the ceiling is closing in on me!!!

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
  21. Paris Hilton by khasim · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wealthier individuals with the larger home... does the environment itself produce children who are less restricted in their thinking?

    You tell me.
    1. Re:Paris Hilton by Radon360 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Keeping in mind that there is a difference between restrictive thinking and the ability to think in the first place.

      Perhaps one could say that her self discretion has been less restrictive from such an environment.

  22. Hobbit houses? by C0y0t3 · · Score: 1

    So accountants and programmers and all dreg office workers should really be crammed into little hobbit house cubes? I'm already shoved into a windowless cave, now I lose my headroom too?

    This research sucks.

    1. Re:Hobbit houses? by servognome · · Score: 1

      So accountants and programmers and all dreg office workers should really be crammed into little hobbit house cubes? I'm already shoved into a windowless cave, now I lose my headroom too?
      There's a difference between understanding one aspect of human behavior and being able to modify human behavior the way you want.
      A tiny cubicle may inspire more detail oriented thinking, but may have the consequence of lowering productivity because of other psychological effects.
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    2. Re:Hobbit houses? by MORB · · Score: 1

      That's assuming a good programmer is one focusing on the details instead of the big picture.
      Both are probably useful, but it seems that there is an excess of the detail oriented ones, at least where I work, and as a result our codebase has no discernable overall architecture.
      It looks more like fungus, growing erratically in every direction. It's unstable, bloated and runs like shit too.

    3. Re:Hobbit houses? by Jaeph · · Score: 1

      Personally, I prefer being in a tight space when I read or code. I like taking a walk when I do design work. So I guess I fit the article.

      Anyways, it may (- see that, "may") be a good idea to give computer people a tighter workspace, and compensate by having a larger open area where they can relax and think big.

      -Jeff

      --
      Please learn the difference between a dissenting opinion and a troll before you moderate.
    4. Re:Hobbit houses? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Being a good programmer is like being a good go player and concentrating both on the details and the big picture. Computers can't play go because current methods are either too detail-focused or too big-picture-focused.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  23. Next step by RyoShin · · Score: 1

    So what happens if we just remove the ceiling?

    1. Re:Next step by beef623 · · Score: 1

      I like that idea. Change the dress code to... er... tropical island casual, move the offices to the roof and give us little umbrellas for our coffee cups.

    2. Re:Next step by the+phantom · · Score: 4, Funny

      You get wet when it rains.

    3. Re:Next step by argent · · Score: 1

      So what happens if we just remove the ceiling?

      Your computer gets stolen and your paperwork gets wet.

    4. Re:Next step by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Unlimited upside potential, with no change in downside. A no-brainer.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    5. Re:Next step by aldm · · Score: 1

      If the ceiling is somebody else's floor?

    6. Re:Next step by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Rain and snow gets in and fry your computer. Then you're back to pen and paper, where there's no GUI and swapping to slow you down.

      Creativity wins!

    7. Re:Next step by Jotii · · Score: 1

      I suppose you have no ceiling, coming up with such a creative reply. Either that, or you have no ceiling and it is raining.

      --
      [sig]
    8. Re:Next step by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Quite a blow to the theory: either he's got a ceiling and yet responding creatively, or he doesn't and is just speaking from experience.

  24. Ok but... by bhmit1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...if they move my desk again I'm going to burn the building down.

  25. lighting is important factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fluorescent lighting is the worst lighting for indoor rooms. With ceiling height a factor too fluorescents strain unshielded eyes and according to a few reports their wavelengths cause migranes and even possibly behavioral/affective disorders over the long term.

    1. Re:lighting is important factor by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Naah, being in an office with co-workers is what causes the behavioral/affective disorders. It's not the fluorescent lights.

    2. Re: lighting is important factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! the study looked at the emitted wavelengths over time measuring two fluroescent light fixtures in a 6' x 6' area room which means a total of four long bulbs and two balasts. It isn't the EM from the power generation but the bulbs' intensity and luminosity. Something about fluroescents not putting out ultraviolet because the phosphorus lining the inside of the bulbs absorbs the outgoing UV. It was a light bulb comparison study between fluorescents and incandescents.

      If I was an architect I wouldn't spec fluros they emit horrible lighting.

      Here's a flaw in slashdot moderation.. I got a zero in the first post I wrote yet you Pitabred get a score of two. This clearly shows that they had to read my post to compare your post to mine in order to form a substantitive analysis. In that case I should have *at least* gotten a score of one, else the case for derivative logic using moderation fails.

  26. On a wider note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They should do a study that shows people prefer aisles wide enough to walk through."

    Well the increasing wideness in americans is making this difficult.

  27. A whole new meaning... by doyoulikeworms · · Score: 1

    Free your mind! Embrace the glass ceiling!

  28. Height of Ceiling VS Height of Worker? by HappyHead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The next question is - since ceiling height really is relative to how tall the person in the room is, (a 6.5 foot high ceiling would brush some people's heads and feel cramped, while others I know in the industry would not be able to reach it while standing on their desks and jumping.) does this mean that very short people are generally more prone to activating the idea of "freedom", while ludicrously tall people are more prone to thinking in constrained, confined concepts, when both are placed in an identical office environment?

    1. Re:Height of Ceiling VS Height of Worker? by stecoop · · Score: 1

      I thought the reverse direction. Tall people require taller ceilings; therfore, the tasks that taller people have are more unconfined and less constraining.

    2. Re:Height of Ceiling VS Height of Worker? by RockoTDF · · Score: 1

      Probably not, the difference between a tall person and a short person could be about a foot or perhaps 18", and the difference between a low and high ceiling in this study is likely several feet at least.

      --
      There is more to science than physics!

      www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
    3. Re:Height of Ceiling VS Height of Worker? by nbert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd say that small people just get used to having more space above (just like they are used to looking up when they speak to someone of average height). They will perceive a low ceiling exactly like a really tall person.

      A personal side note: I had the luxury of growing up in an apartment with 3 meter ceilings (~10 foot). It's nothing special - just an older building in Europe. However, growing up under such conditions, I find it quite hard to accept any place where someone of average height can touch the ceiling. It's just like a cave to me plus the air is much worse. It might be more costly to build and to heat such buildings, but seriously: Do we have the best trade-off between construction, maintenance and living standard if the inhabitants can barely move without destroying e.g. the chandelier?

    4. Re:Height of Ceiling VS Height of Worker? by cowscows · · Score: 1

      I think there are very few people who would not find a 6.5 foot high ceiling to be uncomfortable.

      I'm also curious as to what industry you work in, where people would not be able to jump off their desk and reach that ceiling. The average desk height is around 30" which leaves four feet to a 6.5 foot high ceiling.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    5. Re:Height of Ceiling VS Height of Worker? by HappyHead · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm about 3 feet taller than the really short person, and the article says the ceilings they used were 8 feet and 10 feet, so a difference of two feet, which is less than the height difference. (and if you work on height ratios and keep things to scale, the person-height difference is even larger than the ceiling height difference, at 1:2 versus 4:5).

  29. It's true for me, at least. by Control+Group · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This, while news to me, doesn't actually surprise me at all.

    I've encountered this effect personally - working on cars, the thought and problem-solving processes I go through when lying on the driveway under the car are notably different than those when I shimmy out and stand up next to it. Case in point: the starter/solenoid assembly on a 1977 Caprice is practically a topological brain teaser if you're trying to put it in or take it out without removing significant sections of the frame. There's literally one correct ordered set of rotations and translations that must be performed to do so.

    Standing next to the car with the starter, I had an incredibly hard time solving this problem. Once under the car, however, it was a matter of a few minutes before I could "see" the solution. Before everyone points out the obvious, no, it wasn't a matter of being able to literally see the solution; given the available vantage point due to the right front tire, the jack, and a frame member, you really couldn't see any more of the problem than the first opening.

    That's the most specific example I've got, but a similar thing has happened to me multiple times. At this point, I spend most of my planning time under the car with rust falling in my eyes, because I think better that way.

    --

    Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    1. Re:It's true for me, at least. by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      That could always just be increased blood flow to the brain due to your reclined position, or even specifically to the occipital lobe (i.e., the back of your brain).

    2. Re:It's true for me, at least. by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      It absolutely could be. I don't mean to hold this up as any kind of evidence; there's a dearth of controls and a surfeit of variables, I know.

      It just lines up well with what the study is concluding, and, for me, lends credence to those conclusions.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    3. Re:It's true for me, at least. by w.p.richardson · · Score: 1

      there's a dearth of controls and a surfeit of variables

      well, you are the control group.

      --

      Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

    4. Re:It's true for me, at least. by cowscows · · Score: 1

      Did the correct process require you to be under the car in order to install the part? Perhaps going through the motions in your mind became easier when you were physically oriented in the same position that you'd be using to accomplish the task?

      I spend a good amount of time taking old floor plan drawings to buildings and verifying dimensions and such. As soon as I enter the building, my first action is usually to orient the plans correctly to the actual building, and plot the path I'm going to take. Even though I might just be in one small room and unable to see any of the rest of the building, orienting the plan properly makes thinking my way through it work much better. Some of my coworkers don't seem to find that step nearly as necessary as I do.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    5. Re:It's true for me, at least. by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      I probably should have seen that one coming.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    6. Re:It's true for me, at least. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also true for me... I actually came to the same hypothesis as stated in the article.
      I grew up in a house where the ceiling was about 3,2 meters (10 foot 6 inch) high in the second floor, where I had my room,
      and 4-5 meters in the first floor.
      Now I'm living in a flat with a ceiling 2,6 meters (8 foot 6 inch) high. Sitting here, I don't feel as free as I do in my parents house, and this has a direct influence on my "mental horizon".

  30. Nonsense by Stevecrox · · Score: 1

    Lots of my idea's are considered "out of the box" thinking and they generally happen where ever I may be. I'll admit that many people dislike low ceiling rooms, I know a converted building has recently been turned back to its original use because it was a horrible place to learn (because of low ceilings and small class room sizes) but I wouldn't say its because of idea's about freedom. When people don't feel enclosed they tend to be happier, happy people tend to be more creative and productive. But theres far more involved in making a happy worker than high ceilings.

  31. I must have intuitively known this by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    Back in my college days I'd walk across campus to study in the library's 25-foot high reading room rather than slither down to my dorm basement to use one of the study cubes with a steam pipe right over my head. If nothing else, I was far less likely to doze off in the big room.

  32. On the Moon!! Fly Me to the Moon, Baby !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    On the Moon!! Fly Me to the Moon, Baby !!

    Drop out - Tune in - Turn on (or the other way around if you prefer!)

  33. Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a load of old big hairy bollocks

    1. Re:Bollocks by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      You must be in a room with short ceilings, otherwise your comment would have been more creative ;)

    2. Re:Bollocks by Stevecrox · · Score: 1

      no, the OP must have a really low ceiling, thats a 'closed minded' view not open to the idea of 'freedom'

  34. I would trot out the Soviet Russia joke by suitepotato · · Score: 3, Funny

    but it seems that everywhere, the ceiling makes you.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    1. Re:I would trot out the Soviet Russia joke by fan+of+lem · · Score: 1

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of vertically adjustable ceilings!

  35. Activating idea of freedom as a negative... by KokorHekkus · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...kind of. :)

    I went to a school that was built in the early 1800s and had some really high ceilings on the top floor... about 15 feet high. The doors were made of massive wood and 8 feet high. This prompted some creativity in the students and there was a teacher that was usually a bit late so they unhinged the inwards opening door, put it back so that it was just held by the handle lock. Teacher enters and door falls down with a really really major bang as it went down. Teaching staff was not amused by students apparent creativty.

  36. Did she get their money's worth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know, the condo purchaser on a recent job who was going to get 11'10-1/2" ceilings but forced the developer to spend more than $10k to move existing pipes because she insisted that her contract called for 12'0" high ceilings seemed pretty detail oriented to me.

  37. Already happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's how things already seem to be. Creative companies that charge an arm and a leg have the money and they also need to impress potential clients. With rank and file jobs, there are usually nobody from the outside that you need to impress.

    *Strange... The word in the image that I have to type as AC always relates to the topic. This time, it's "creative."

  38. Einstein by iplayfast · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Interesting, in that Einstein liked to go for long walks under the open sky.

    From the headline. When people are in a room with a high ceiling, they activate the idea of freedom and The concept of freedom promotes information processing that encourages greater variation in the kinds of thoughts one has, said Meyers-Levy...

  39. Superfriends by vjmurphy · · Score: 2, Funny

    "When people are in a room with a high ceiling, they activate the idea of freedom."

    "Wonder Twin powers activate!"
    "Shape of an idea of freedom!"
    "Form of an ice-- wait, what? Can Gleek carry that in a bucket?"

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
  40. Good thing my office has a sloping roof by corsec67 · · Score: 1

    Depending on where I look, my office either has a really, really short roof, or a fairly tall roof. Do I get the best of both worlds?

    (Yeah, it is a home office)

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    1. Re:Good thing my office has a sloping roof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, this may give your thinking a definite slant, but we can't be sure what direction it'll go in.

  41. on the other hand.. by dotpavan · · Score: 2, Funny

    be careful not to have too high ceilings, as you might be thinking out-of-the box and returning back might be a problem (or tiresome?)

  42. Hats have similar effect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember back in university days, I have noticed that my conceptual understanding / problem solving skills significantly diminished while wearing a hat. As wierd as it may sound. Not sure if it is just me, or affects others too, but feel free to give it a try. Find an IQ quiz with some geometry diagram problems or similar, and attempt to solve it while wearing a hat. You literaly feel constrained, well other than the fact that you have a tight hat on your head.

    I remember even kidding around, developing a non constraining helmet for airplane pilots, and selling it to the military. :P

  43. So which direction do you go? by Dancindan84 · · Score: 1

    Creativity and attention to details are both qualities that are valuable. Being creative can help you solve difficult problems that require "out of the box" thinking, while being good with details is valuable for managing time and repetitive tasks. I doubt I'm going to have an auditorium to do deep thinking in, or a cage to do my routine work in so how is this useful in practical terms?

    --
    "Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much." - Oscar Wilde
  44. This news is about 3000 years late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called Feng Shui.

    Oh wait, this is slashdot, where ancient traditions and science should never mix, huh.

    1. Re:This news is about 3000 years late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as I thought

  45. Top 3 research university by UMNbandgeek · · Score: 1

    I sure am glad to see the wonderful studies my tuition pays for. This kind of fascinating research will surely help the U reach it's goal of being in the top 3 research universities!

  46. Malkovich? by Neil+Jansen · · Score: 1

    Dr. Lester: Any questions?
    Craig Schwartz: Just one. Why are these ceilings so low?
    Dr. Lester: Low overhead, my boy - we pass the savings on to you! But seriously, that'll all be covered in the orientation.

  47. observation by snarfwarg · · Score: 1

    oddly enough, when you sit down, the ceiling gets higher...

    --
    It's not what you Warg, it's how you Snarf
  48. What About Tall People? by Chagatai · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm nearly 7 feet tall, so how does this affect my ideas? Can I call in a "ceiling bias" at work when a short coworker comes up with a great, broad idea and I tend to develop something more constrained and compact? How about when I run into a doorjamb? How does that affect my ideas?

    --
    --Chag
    1. Re:What About Tall People? by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm nearly 7 feet tall, so how does this affect my ideas? Can I call in a "ceiling bias" at work

      On the other hand, didn't Newton say something around the lines of "If I have been able to see further, it is because I have been surrounded by midgets"?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:What About Tall People? by mcpkaaos · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about when I run into a doorjamb? How does that affect my ideas?

      Depending on how fast you are running, your entire idea might stay in the room you just left. Wait, my bad, that would be your head. Eh, same difference.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    3. Re:What About Tall People? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have nothing to complain about. Other studies show that taller people tend to earn more money and have higher IQ. I'm not joking, Google it.

    4. Re:What About Tall People? by El_Isma · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd avise you to sue your company, evidently they're jamming your ideas. They'll probably try to accomodate you and send you to the street, where you'll have an infinite roof and therefore infinitely broad ideas.

      In regards with the doorways, if you ever need to work in details, my recommendation is that you try to work under your desk. I've found that does wonders for your work. If you manage to find a tea table or some other short table consider yourself in heaven. The only limit here is the size of your head. I've heard of some indians that found a way to make your head smaller therefore making your detailed work even better.

    5. Re:What About Tall People? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, didn't Newton say something around the lines of "If I have been able to see further, it is because I have been surrounded by midgets"?


      Midgets can see pretty far between everyone's legs.

  49. All this time... by polyomninym · · Score: 1

    You mean, all this time, while I was starring down at my work with my head buried, I should have been starring off into space? Sounds like someone stopped whatever serious work or research they were doing to stare off into space and ended up wasting time on this idea, instead;)

  50. Problem-Solving Skills Are: +1, Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    enhanced by this substance.

    Patriotically as always,
    K. Trout, Psychiatrist

    1. Re:Problem-Solving Skills Are: +1, Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ahh, yes. In fact, in large doses, approx. 400 micrograms and higher, you may find yourself solving many problems. Not the least of which would be "How the hell do I get out of this chair?"

    2. Re:Problem-Solving Skills Are: +1, Interesting by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Actually, I read a story a few years back about how some of the tightly-wound type A engineers in Silicon Valley would sometimes go out into the dessert in a group and take hallucinogens to do creative problem solving if they had a particularly tough problem that wasn't being solved the conventional ways. Pretty sure they were doing lower level doses - otherwise they spend to much time looking at their fingers and saying the same word over and over again until it loses all meaning...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    3. Re:Problem-Solving Skills Are: +1, Interesting by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      some of the tightly-wound type A engineers in Silicon Valley would sometimes go out into the dessert in a group and take hallucinogens

      I don't know what they took, but just trying to visualize a bunch of guys going out into a dessert (I imagined something with ice-cream and lots of fruit, but YMMV) makes me wonder: which hallucinogen are you on?

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    4. Re:Problem-Solving Skills Are: +1, Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rumor has it Francis Crick dosed 100 micrograms of LSD which may have played a part in his discovery of DNA (although he would sue anyone publishing this rumor) and he was also a founding member of a group called SOMA which tried to prevent the outlaw of weed in the UK back in the 1960s. The DSM-IV declares cannabis to be a mild hallucinogen and perhaps he also noticed similarities or potential for mind expansion? got this from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Crick

    5. Re:Problem-Solving Skills Are: +1, Interesting by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Hey, Burning Man takes place out in the desert every year and is full of executive types by day running around half naked and on hallucinogens. The reason the engineers did it is because they claimed it allowed them to approach a problem in an unconventional manner, and try to solve it differently. Don't recall exactly which type of hallucinogens, but think it was something like MDMA or DOC or one of the "designer" hallucinogens.

      As to which one I am on, well, those days are behind me now, life is strange enough as it is...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    6. Re:Problem-Solving Skills Are: +1, Interesting by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      I was merely trying to be funny instead of a spelling-Nazi.

      The fact that I have to explain that proves I have failed.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    7. Re:Problem-Solving Skills Are: +1, Interesting by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      And apparently I was on too many mushrooms to even notice the second "s" in my first post...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  51. General Observations by RockoTDF · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a psychology student/researcher, I must say our worst enemy is the media. The way these stories are reported sometimes distorts the research or the conclusions drawn from it. If you were to read the actual journal article when it is published, it will likely be far less B.S. like "activating inner creativity" and more like "participants in the higher ceiling room demonstrated more creativity as measured by (variable)." Although the article may have used BS terms since its a marketing journal and not a proper psych journal. The publication standards in education, communication, and marketing journals are generally less demanding and so sometimes crap gets through and makes all scientific research outside of bio/chem/physics look bad. Also, since correlation does not imply causation it is possible that as previously mentioned certain jobs will intentionally create different environments for whatever reason...ie graphic designers may care more about an open aesthetically pleasing office than engineers who sit in cubicles and just want to do their work. In addition this article fails to give any actual statistics, which limits how much we can critique it...so if it has a correlation of .9 there is probably a good connection between ceiling height and creativity, but if its only .3 it could just be coincidental or due to many outside factors.

    --
    There is more to science than physics!

    www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
  52. Medieval Europe by vertinox · · Score: 1

    If this was the case, wouldn't more free thinking going on in the giant cathedrals of the time?

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    1. Re: Medieval Europe by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      If this was the case, wouldn't more free thinking going on in the giant cathedrals of the time? So you are saying that you are not a boring closed minded bigot parroting tired rhetoric?
      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    2. Re: Medieval Europe by vertinox · · Score: 1

      No.

      I'm just saying that medieval cathedrals were not well known for their free thinking as apposed to European universities or Muslim scholars of the same time period.

      Hence... We have a correlation/causation issue here.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  53. The Problem WIth Low Ceilings by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Low ceilings interfere with my tinfoil hat thus allowing the CIA satellites to harrass me.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  54. Glass by hansamurai · · Score: 2, Funny

    Makes me wish I was a woman and could work under that limitless glass ceiling they're always talking about!

  55. Thinking outside the box! by thewiz · · Score: 1

    Great... now our managers will put us back a cube/office/cage.

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
  56. I expected the reverse. by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Put people in a room with a 2-ft ceiling, they're going to get damned resourceful, and fast.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  57. Easy Workaround by toadgee · · Score: 1

    Solution : Sit on the floor when thinking. Now the ceiling is further away from you. (Thought of in a room with a 9 foot ceiling.)

  58. Ceiling Height Variety by bmajik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    More people discovering what Christopher Alexander discovered, and what thousands of years of humans knew before he re-discovered it.

    Pattern #190: Ceiling Height Variety

    http://www.ahartman.com/apl/patterns/apl190.htm

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    1. Re:Ceiling Height Variety by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      Along with a great many of other patterns people are "rediscovering" these days. Unfortunately today as then, if not more so today, people (i.e. politicians) only want to take part of the set of patterns, which often leads to more trouble than they previously had. Many of our problems with traffic, and the resulting mess of pollution, frustration, and sheer time waste that occurs as a result could have been avoided by following the patterns C.A. had regarding density and building size when combined with mixed "zones".

      Instead we got saddled with "urban planning" bozos who spend our money telling us what we want and then making or passing laws that mandate what "we want". Wal-Mart didn't kill the corner store, zoning laws did.

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
    2. Re:Ceiling Height Variety by strikethree · · Score: 1

      This is totally off topic, but your nickname is/was used by a very knowledgeable guy on various car tuning boards who "disappeared" about two years ago now. By any chance, are you that guy?

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    3. Re:Ceiling Height Variety by bmajik · · Score: 1

      I don't think it was me. Which boards?

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    4. Re:Ceiling Height Variety by strikethree · · Score: 1

      AEM and EvolutionM.net

      Sorry to have bothered you bro. Peace.

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  59. Lots of low ceilings in France? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is marketing a Science now?

    Y'know, they do have other subjects in college besides science.

    I could have told you that the author was a marketeer from the first two sentences of the summary:

    'When people are in a room with a high ceiling, they activate the idea of freedom. In a low-ceilinged room, they activate more constrained, confined concepts.'

    Activate the idea of freedom? WTF? So I guess France must hate a lot of buildings with low ceilings because they hate our freedom, right? I guess I'll have to make sure to eat my Freedom Fries in McDonald's restaurants with cathedral ceilings from now on.

    The concept of freedom promotes information processing that encourages greater variation in the kinds of thoughts one has, said Meyers-Levy, professor of marketing at the University of Minnesota.

    Why do I get the idea that the tenure review for a professor of marketing basically entails the applicant standing in front of a PowerPoint presentation trying to con the department into granting him a permanent position?

    1. Re:Lots of low ceilings in France? by martinX · · Score: 1

      Why do I get the idea that the tenure review for a professor of marketing basically entails the applicant standing in front of a PowerPoint presentation trying to con the department into granting him a permanent position?

      Perhaps he mastered the transitions. Or could embed a movie that actually worked on the day...

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  60. Wow? so what's next? by kinglink · · Score: 1

    People think better in non-cramped spaces? Cubicles should go? Beer at company meetings improves morale? (The last is from my current employer, it does).

  61. Old Japanese buildings by Mobile+Mineral · · Score: 1

    have really high ceilings. New ones have really low ceilings.

  62. I agree by ProteusQ · · Score: 1

    I'm 6'9" (1.98m), and I definitely agree. We need taller ceilings, taller doorways, bigger chairs, bigger desks. And why stop there? We should eliminate shoe stores that only carry only pair of size 16 shoes! We want... no, we *demand* a revolution! The biggest revolution ever!! Only the tall shall survive! You will all look up to us in the end! Mwaa ha ha!!

    Wait... I'm getting off-topic. Yeah, higher ceilings would be nice.

  63. Let's give it a try by Jotii · · Score: 1

    I'm outside now. +1 Insightful, please.

    --
    [sig]
  64. Outside! by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Well, if high ceilings improve creativity... why not make creative people work outside?

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  65. another proposed test by jafac · · Score: 1

    If this is largely based on visual cues (and I'm going to assume that's the case, here; don't know how it could be otherwise) - then it should be a fairly simple task to take an FPS-type video game, modify the maps into two or three experimental configurations, one with high ceilings, the other with low ceilings (assuming that the ceiling height does not impact game mechanics) - and then have three groups of individuals play the games. See which group performs "better".

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  66. Send 100 people out to do some statistical... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    ...testing and 1% will find results that are 99% significant just by chance. Here's that 1% folks.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  67. clearly... by ephedream · · Score: 1

    Executives need to be on the top floor where there is a plastic bubble instead of a roof. ...And the engineers must toil away in dark, short-ceilinged caves, narrowly focused on the tasks that their overlords ask of them, in fulfillment of the Grand Vision that having no ceiling has made possible. Either that or make holographic screens on the ceilings to make them look higher or lower depending on the task at hand.

  68. room noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rooms with high ceilings tend to be large rooms.

    Large rooms tend to have lots of ambient noise.

    Noise tends to interrupt our ability to concentrate on the task at hand.

    Audible distractions need to be a part of that study.

  69. She asked me to tell you by megaditto · · Score: 1

    ...that the beatings will continue until the morale improves

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  70. Junk Science by rir · · Score: 1

    Since when are subjective observations on a group of people in rooms with different ceilings called Science?

    How about: "New study reveals Sociologists unable to cope with the realization that they are not real scientists."

    1. Re:Junk Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about: "New study reveals Sociologists unable to cope with the realization that they are not real scientists." That explains what the human resources department is, but it doesn't explain how they managed to worm their way into authoritative positions in corporate America.

      Way back when, some corporate lawyer must have married a sociologist. It's been downhill from there.
  71. Science methodology affected by ceiling height? by macraig · · Score: 1

    I think that the world of science has finally hit some kinda ceiling....

  72. Etymology? by martyb · · Score: 1

    So, a "bright idea", gives an additional meaning to the phrase: "The sky's the limit!" :^)

  73. Absurd by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Either can be good.

    This is absurd. It's no answer at all to say that either is good, and neither is bad. You might as well ask for a ceiling that's both high, and low, at the same time. Or one that adjusts to your mood, or the detail of work you're doing in that second. It reminds me of the old PC versus Mac, and which promotes better results. Either, depending on what you're doing at that moment.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Absurd by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1

      This is absurd. It's no answer at all to say that either is good, and neither is bad. Yes, because every person in every situation ever is ideally served by a single ceiling height from now until ever. Don't bump your head when you stand up.
  74. makes sense... by 7Prime · · Score: 1

    I wondered why after moving into my 4ft high cabin, all I could think about was sex and urination. Now I know.

    --
    Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
  75. How ir works out by digitig · · Score: 1

    Executives should work on the grand scheme in vast halls, whilst their drones work out the detail in low-ceilinged cubicle farms.

    Boy, those researches sure knew who decides their research grants!

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  76. Facts? +2, Helpful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You stated:
    "In fact, in large doses, approx. 400 micrograms and higher, you may find yourself solving many problems."

    You also probably believe Art Linkletter's
    assertion about LSD.

    Please cite your sources.

    I'll cite this Nobel Prize Recipient.

    Thanks playing,
    Kilgore Trout

  77. Of course by JamesP · · Score: 1

    I have fear of heights and if I can change a light bulb without using the stairs, that problem becomes easier for me to solve.

    Elementary, my dear Watson

    Other than that... I don't buy it.

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  78. Strange relationship between... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone else noticed a possible correlation of some sort between wall height and ceiling height?

    It was pointed out to me by one of my brighter students. I was so embarrassed that I hadn't realized it first that I felt obligated to give away my name,... hence AC.

  79. Peripatesis by Push+Latency · · Score: 1

    I've always said that the key to creativity is peripatesis... Io Aristotle!

  80. Asking for Career Advice on Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is like asking for sex advice in Penthouse.

    Chronic masturbaters are not likely going to give any qualified answers.

  81. work sitting by bluenote39 · · Score: 1

    thats why I always sit around on my ass instead of standing up for myself.. creative thinking baby..

  82. Or a shift to IE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firefox makes even the dumbest among us spell smarter.

    Now all Firefox needs is a animated paper clip to help us with grammar.

    1. Re:Or a shift to IE? by Hyperspite · · Score: 1

      I am so glad firefox came out with the spell checker. I'd used to have to open up word or something (I have a duel boot - don't worry slashdot) and paste the text in and check it. Man, that sucked.

    2. Re:Or a shift to IE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd used to have to open up word or something (I have a duel boot - don't worry slashdot) and paste the text in and check it. Man, that sucked. Wait -- so you'd reboot your computer twice each time you wanted to check the spelling of a word?
      Yeah, that must have sucked. And slashdot is still worried for you.
    3. Re:Or a shift to IE? by Hyperspite · · Score: 1

      I said it was painful. *cries at the memories*

  83. So it's not Short Person Syndrome by Centurix · · Score: 1

    It just seems that way, but they are in fact so free-thinking that it's out of our regular free-thinking frequency. Kind of like the infrasound of free thinking. We see it as Short Person Syndrome.

    I've totally changed my way of talking to shorter people. Instead of being cautious and watching where I swing my knees, I'll be able to admire their ability.

    One would even say this is the mythical '2' we've been looking for all these years.

    1. Find a tall room
    2. *Find a Short Person* (This is key)
    3. Profit!

    --
    Task Mangler
  84. Little People? by mr_stinky_britches · · Score: 1

    Note: Yes, this is off topic. Please accept my apologies in advance.

    > others I know in the industry would not be able to reach it while standing on their desks and jumping.

    Lets say the average desk is roughly 30 inches tall.

    6.5 ft. is 78 inches

    78 in. - 30 in. = 48 in., which is 4 feet. Assuming these little tykes have a vertical leap of at least 1 foot , they would have to be no more than 3 ft. tall! Either you know some 2 year olds who are "in industry" or you know some little people who are littler than I've ever heard of.

    Do "little people" really come that small? If they do ..it's news to me.

    --
    Do The Fizzle Dance

    --
    Censorship is obscene. Patriotism is bigotry. Faith is a vice. Slashdot 2.0 sucks.
    1. Re:Little People? by HappyHead · · Score: 1

      The one I'm talking about is just a bit under 3 feet tall himself, and can't jump more than four or five inches on a good day. With a desk at 2 feet, 6 inches (30" total), his reach standing on the desk and jumping would be just about six feet. (really small people with really small legs can't jump as high as full sized people.)

      The industry I'm talking about is computer programming/web design. We get stuffed into closets to work at times - my current office has a ceiling at 6 feet, 10 inches, though I've worked in other offices/closets that ranged from 14 foot ceilings (the back office at a furniture place) down to the 6 foot 6 inch ceiling I mentioned before (the 'server room' for a foriegn car dealership, which was added to the top of the building as an afterthought, and really felt like a strong wind would rip it off the top of the place. Most of the details I was focused on when I was there were "get this thing fixed fast so I can get the heck out of here!")

      The 6 foot 6 inch programmer I knew never had to work there (in the 6'6" office), but if he had, he'd have been able to pop out ceiling tiles with his head by stretching.

  85. Hollyhock House, Low Ceilings, & Architecture by codeonezero · · Score: 1

    Although my knowledge of architecture/psychology is limited, it seems like low ceilings have always had a psychological impact on people. Architects like Frank Lloyd Wright recognized this and exploited it in places like the Hollyhock House where the front entrance has a small area with an uncomfortably low ceiling, followed by the rest of the room having a high ceiling. When I took a visit to this place about ten years ago, it was explained to us that low ceilings make people uncomfortable and thus the high ceilings would allow more freedom. So naturally guests should never stand at the front entrance too long and in a place like Hollyhock House high ceilings become inviting after you spend any amount of time at the front entrance :-)

    See: http://www.waltlockley.com/hollyhock/hollyhock.htm

    In any case interesting to see that more angles on this low ceiling/high ceiling idea are being looked into.

    --

    ....
    int main (void) { ... }

  86. State by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    The concept of your "state" affecting your effectiveness, is not news (although this is an interesting detail on the same).

    I remember playing pool with some sailing friends one night, playing an average game. They asked me about my business, which happened to be (at the time, at least) going extremely well. I was enthusiastic, confident, and excited telling them about the business. And suddenly I was kicking ass at pool; nobody could touch me. Similarly, there have been times when things weren't going well, in a negative state, and pool and other attempts at things, were quite poor.

    (Another example, on the positive side, was when my home office overlooked the ocean; I was inspired and confident and produced some great stuff.)

    Being in an environment with lofty, spacious ceilings, is inspiring. It's symbolic of success and riches (high ceilings in expensive houses, etc.) So it's not surprising there are measurable differences in results. Lock someone in a 4x4 box, and see what kind of results they get :)

    (I've read a bit of NLP and Tony Robbins stuff, which focuses upon this concept a lot; almost to an extreme. Yes, it's new-age-ish and pop-psychology-ish, but it is effective and based in a lot of good behavioural psychology. And it does work, surprisingly well. Get yourself in a peak state, even through somewhat artificial means, and you'll achieve more. It's a powerful self-fulfilling prophecy.)

    (/me looks at my 7 foot ceilings, and contemplates a renovation...)

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  87. Minor correction by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    I wrote: and based in a lot of good behavioural psychology

    I should have said "cognitive psychology." Minor nit, but thought I'd correct it.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  88. Alternate conclusion by PPH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did they consider whether, for a fixed ceiling height, shorter people exhibited less constrained thinking?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  89. Those people lived before the first house... by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

    They must be damn smart, because their ceilings were infinite high, right, they were so smart that they even could create ceiling. Now that all make sense.

    --
    There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
  90. Original study here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.carlsonschool.umn.edu/assets/71190.pdf

    Notice how they talk about people as if they are "consumers"? Rather nauseating. However, given that this professor is in a marketing department, perhaps she is required to produce consumer-related research.

  91. math... by yderf · · Score: 1

    I knew I should be doing my math work outside! Now I just need to wheel a chalkboard out there.

  92. Obligatory... by ian-live · · Score: 0

    All your ceilings are belong to us.

    --
    Born, to clone
  93. John Malkovich? by Hershmire · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who thought of "Being John Malkovich" after reading this?

    "Low overhead!"

    --
    if(!toilet_paper) roll.replace(new roll); //Stupid roommates.
  94. monitor size by fyoder · · Score: 1

    When I'm working on a problem on the computer, I'm physically in the room, but my mind is in some abstract space such that the height of the ceiling is really irrelevant. Perhaps they should do a study on the effects of monitor size. I might feel more constrained using a 14" monitor. Or operating systems. Unless I can install cygwin, I feel really constrained in Windows.

    --
    Loose lips lose spit.
  95. All hail the studio apartment!!! by dkarma · · Score: 1

    All curse the cubicle.

  96. So, if I wanted both worlds by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

    I could have a complicated assemblage of mirrors in the ceiling.

    --
    Your ad could be here!
  97. I knew that by X10 · · Score: 0

    Doesn't surprise me a bit. I've always felt more at ease and more creative in big spaces with a high ceiling. I thought everyone would.

    --
    no, I don't have a sig
  98. Meyers-Levy, professor of marketing by kwikrick · · Score: 1

    ergo, this is not science.

    --
    assignment != equality != identity
  99. Obviously not... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Japanese buildings tend to have fairly low ceilings, due to space being at a premium and them wanting to make the best use of it. Yet, when it comes to innovation, the Japanese are way ahead of, say, us British with our old high ceiling buildings.

    It seems more like a cultural thing than anything. R&D = risk, something we are deathly afraid of here. We prefer just to have the government waste money for us, thanks.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  100. What about outdoor environments? by master_p · · Score: 1

    By this line of thinking, we should be more intelligent at outdoor environments.

  101. Obvious Favouritism by eyendall · · Score: 1

    Clearly an outright bias in favour of short people. Sig: If I say something and my wife is not there to hear it, am I still wrong?

  102. peripathetic philisophers by Walkyria · · Score: 1

    yes, the ancient greek philosophers wandered around while discussing ideas, but it was mainly to get fresh air, and also, cause the walking will make the blood circulation more effective, so their brains will be better oxygenated. (Healthy Mind in a Healthy Body). The "no ceiling" benefit could be a plus. Now I'm worried about all the accountants that spend most of their labor time trapped into small cubicles. Hey, more programmers do so too! If that makes 'em more focused on details, how can you explain so much accounting errors and bugs? Hmmm... variables, variables, why are you so many?!

    --
    "...Supreme Excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting..." Sun Tzu. The Art Of War
  103. Book on the subject by mariox19 · · Score: 1

    There's a book I've been meaning to read that you may be interested in: Last Child In The Woods.

    I think the title alone gives you a pretty good idea of what it's about.

    --

    quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

  104. stop ''0''ing cornerstone comments ( lighting ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It happened again: a zero score for an insightful, on-topic post. I don't see how the lighting in a room and a room's height could not be important. Is it because I post as anonymous coward? Maybe I'm being singled out by my IP addresses.

    Basing positive moderation scores on absolute adherence to the topic and not considering intelligent, logical tangents will stifle good discourse and free speech. This is the other flaw in the slashdot moderation system. The fact I'm calling slashdot on its B.S. may be why I'm getting zero scores. I'm exposing an online institutional weakness and the slashdot clique doesn't like that!

    A stupid comment on glass ceilings gets a score of one?