I simply don't trust myself to make a 100% secure server, as most should not be and are not qualified to do so. Why go through all the trouble and risk when a free alternate solution already exists?
The only thing you have to be concerned with is that if you use personal e-mail at work they can in the event of a lawsuit have access to your personal e-mail as part of a subpoena.
You still have to assume we're in a non-ideal world, which is very much true. Suppose there is a way to mitigate this issue on Google's end, is there something wrong with taking action to reduce the amount of attacks, even if the website is at fault?
Even if I lived half the distance (15 minutes from work), that's still a year's worth of full time working. The point only becomes irrelevant if you live within 5 minutes of your job.
I'm extremely frugal and I'd still buy one the instant an affordable one is released simply because an autonomous car represents a potential savings of 4,000 hours of my life over the life of the car. That's represents 2 years of a full time job. That's time that could be spent doing whatever I usually do at home, including sleeping, entertainment, and personal work/finances. It's incredible to think about.
The etymology of a word does not magically cancel out what it's contemporary meaning is. In fact, the title "Engineer" in many countries including England is a protected title that requires an degree from an accredited university.
I relate your base level IT workers (there is a huge difference between a server administrator and a level 1 IT worker) to a mechanic. It's a job that most anyone can learn and is taught mostly through experience, hence the lack of need of degrees.
That's really small, in fact it's less than the average size of a home. Considering you have a lot of otherwise unusable desert out west, this sounds like a great use of land.
Technically nothing stores electricity except for super-cooled superconductors. Batteries "store electricity" in the form of chemical energy and even capacitors only "store electricity" as two charged plates. But I think we all know what they meant, that it was storing the potential for electricity.
If we are able to reach the point where humans can almost entirely replace humans, then we are approaching a potential utopia moment where we are no longer restricted by labor, which would cause an explosion in standard of living and eliminate the need for a lot of people to work (people would have the option to either live off a basic wage and never work or make a lot of money in jobs that require a lot of intelligence).
It's 720p, which is just fine for an 11" monitor that is only doing basic web browsing, e-mail, and video playing. You have to remember, this is a bottom of the line $250 laptop/netbook, very minimal by design. Considering it's half the price of even new low end laptops, you have to delusional to expect it to be feature rich.
The beauty of technology and efficiency is that the money saved is simply spent and invested elsewhere. The market will always take advantage of labor as an available resource. A better question is whether we will see more lower wage jobs because of it since the market may not value labor as much as before.
If they aren't even looking into it and doing research on a potentially powerful form of revenue then they are idiots. I know no one wants it but as a business they need to examine profitability and user reception as a factor to be tested.
Out of pure curiosity; in the ideal world if backward compatibility was not a concern, what would be considered the best modern architecture to use for personal computers?
People typically don't make a fuss over what they are used to. The issue is that of civil liberties and the right to information. It may not be a big issue there, but for many of us we feel that every person has that right.
All I know is that FAT32 is incredibly simple for writing to. It just sequentially writes to memory in every free spot available, adding the address of the next cluster of the data to a table at the beginning of the partition. NTFS must just be much more complex in handling all the writing. When you add several extra operations every time you write to a 4KB or larger cluster, the delay would seem to build up rather quickly.
I simply don't trust myself to make a 100% secure server, as most should not be and are not qualified to do so. Why go through all the trouble and risk when a free alternate solution already exists?
That's why I said "if there is a way". Obviously if it isn't feasible then they can't do anything about it.
The only thing you have to be concerned with is that if you use personal e-mail at work they can in the event of a lawsuit have access to your personal e-mail as part of a subpoena.
You still have to assume we're in a non-ideal world, which is very much true. Suppose there is a way to mitigate this issue on Google's end, is there something wrong with taking action to reduce the amount of attacks, even if the website is at fault?
Even if I lived half the distance (15 minutes from work), that's still a year's worth of full time working. The point only becomes irrelevant if you live within 5 minutes of your job.
The Titan was never meant to be competitive based on price/performance. It's not a fair comparison.
I'm extremely frugal and I'd still buy one the instant an affordable one is released simply because an autonomous car represents a potential savings of 4,000 hours of my life over the life of the car. That's represents 2 years of a full time job. That's time that could be spent doing whatever I usually do at home, including sleeping, entertainment, and personal work/finances. It's incredible to think about.
The problem is that this results in charging for information, effectively limiting the amount of information available to people.
The etymology of a word does not magically cancel out what it's contemporary meaning is. In fact, the title "Engineer" in many countries including England is a protected title that requires an degree from an accredited university.
I relate your base level IT workers (there is a huge difference between a server administrator and a level 1 IT worker) to a mechanic. It's a job that most anyone can learn and is taught mostly through experience, hence the lack of need of degrees.
I hope you realize that prices were far higher back in the "golden years" of flying where you paid for what you got, including all that extra space.
Then buy a t1 line which guarantees up/down bandwidth with 99.9% uptime. There is a reason you are paying $300/month for that guarantee.
That's really small, in fact it's less than the average size of a home. Considering you have a lot of otherwise unusable desert out west, this sounds like a great use of land.
Technically nothing stores electricity except for super-cooled superconductors. Batteries "store electricity" in the form of chemical energy and even capacitors only "store electricity" as two charged plates. But I think we all know what they meant, that it was storing the potential for electricity.
If we are able to reach the point where humans can almost entirely replace humans, then we are approaching a potential utopia moment where we are no longer restricted by labor, which would cause an explosion in standard of living and eliminate the need for a lot of people to work (people would have the option to either live off a basic wage and never work or make a lot of money in jobs that require a lot of intelligence).
It's 720p, which is just fine for an 11" monitor that is only doing basic web browsing, e-mail, and video playing. You have to remember, this is a bottom of the line $250 laptop/netbook, very minimal by design. Considering it's half the price of even new low end laptops, you have to delusional to expect it to be feature rich.
The beauty of technology and efficiency is that the money saved is simply spent and invested elsewhere. The market will always take advantage of labor as an available resource. A better question is whether we will see more lower wage jobs because of it since the market may not value labor as much as before.
If they aren't even looking into it and doing research on a potentially powerful form of revenue then they are idiots. I know no one wants it but as a business they need to examine profitability and user reception as a factor to be tested.
Out of pure curiosity; in the ideal world if backward compatibility was not a concern, what would be considered the best modern architecture to use for personal computers?
If the thing is smashed in or if you painted over it then it longer becomes a concern.
People typically don't make a fuss over what they are used to. The issue is that of civil liberties and the right to information. It may not be a big issue there, but for many of us we feel that every person has that right.
All I know is that FAT32 is incredibly simple for writing to. It just sequentially writes to memory in every free spot available, adding the address of the next cluster of the data to a table at the beginning of the partition. NTFS must just be much more complex in handling all the writing. When you add several extra operations every time you write to a 4KB or larger cluster, the delay would seem to build up rather quickly.
I'm surprised that there is no universal standard to concatenate the two files into a single file in FAT32.
Telsa had an issue with sending electricity long distances with DC, not with using it locally after converting it from AC.
They would if you were playing wooly mammoths. (I'm just being as argumentative as you!)