Slashdot Mirror


Portables Without Cameras?

crankyspice writes "I work routinely in environments where a camera cannot physically be present (e.g., federal court), which really limits what I can carry with me. For instance, I'm a Mac guy, but there's no way to order a MacBook without a built-in webcam (which I've never used on the machines I've owned that have had one). Ditto the iPhone. I'm left with a BlackBerry 8830 and the bottom rung of the [W|L]Intel portables. Even then, when I ordered a Dell Mini 9, I had to wait more than a month because I specified no webcam when I placed the order. This is a relatively common (government, law, sensitive corporate environments) requirement; what have other Slashdotters done? Disabling the camera with a script or somesuch won't convince the $12/hour security guard that there's no camera. How can one easily find portable devices without a built-in camera?"

442 comments

  1. Step back a bit... by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Disabling the camera with a script or somesuch won't convince the $12/hour security guard that there's no camera. How can one easily find portable devices without a built-in camera?

    Simple, non-technical solution: just hire $10/hour security guards!

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Step back a bit... by timothy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not necessarily better!

      I've seen many crazy things to do w/ "security" guards, in all regions of the U.S. and various contexts (courthouses, airports, etc.) A friend of mine had his P38 (old military style) can opener taken off his keychain in the Bucks County Courthouse (PA); it's hard to believe that it's (much) more dangerous as a slashing implement than most of the other keys on the same keychain. And the keychain itself could be used to bludgeon someone. And the strap of my messenger bag could have quite satisfyingly throttled that simpering, simple-headed nogoodnik of a "security guard" in the first place.

      True: walked into a parole office in New Jersey with a fellow about to start parole. The lazy, snickering security guard spotted us after we'd both entered, through the (unattended) flimsy, Soviet-style metal-detector that probably had guts cheaper than the kind you see guys sweeping down the beach. The new parolee, who was carrying nothing, was asked to actually go through the device. I was not (had to ask special) -- even though I was carrying a bag that could have had a few dozen grenades, or mice, or whatever. Perhaps it was because I was wearing a Suit of Hypnosis and a Tie of Knotting.

      Guard soon went back to guarding his GameBoy in the corner 20 or more feet from the entrance.

      timothy

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    2. Re:Step back a bit... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or better yet, get a piece of trim tape that matches closely to the color of the laptop bezel. Cut it to match and look stock.

      When asked, say "If I ordered one with a camera, that's where it would go" If you use an automotive class trim or striping tape it will not easily come off or peel at the edges.

      it's very VERY easy to outwit $12.00 an hour security.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Step back a bit... by Ruede · · Score: 5, Insightful

      what the 20$/hour techy doesnt get is that the 12$/hour guard knows that a camera that is switched off, can easily be switched back on.

    4. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I run into folks like you at work all the time. Most of us just refer to you guys as assholes. It's astonishing to me how arrogant people can be.

      I'm ultimately the one that's going to have to look for any IEDs that somebody might plant in my part of the building as well as screen vehicles coming in. I get that you make more than I do, but that's really no reason to act like such a jack ass.

      You know it's not exactly stress free working at one of the top hundred terrorist targets. And having to put up with arrogant gits like you makes it that much less pleasent.

    5. Re:Step back a bit... by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A friend of mine had his P38 (old military style) can opener taken off his keychain in the Bucks County Courthouse (PA)

      A P38 can opener, for those of you who don't know, is quite possibly the least expensive can-opener possible. It could be accurately be described as a "hinged razor-blade."

      It's really no surprise at all that the security guard wouldn't let that pass. Especially as they're made of stamped aluminum and probably worth about .10 cents each.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    6. Re:Step back a bit... by plover · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This isn't about outwitting security. That's the easy part. The real problem is if you get caught in a high security facility with a camera, it's your job and probably worse. If you add to that the fact that you were actively trying to hide it (with "automotive class trim") you might be accused of espionage.

      --
      John
    7. Re:Step back a bit... by Forge · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Usually the problem isn't how dumb the guard is. Most guards just aren't permitted to think anyway.

      More than once I have asked "why do you have this rule or that" and gotten the response: "Because the boss must be on crack or something".

      As for the cameras issue. That is legit. Not only do courts sometimes deal with cases where identities must be protected (I.e. It's bad enough little Sandy has to testify against her Daddy for molesting her, but putting her picture on the net would make it a whole lot worse) but there are other "institutions" that have vested interest in being photograph free. I.e. Many titty Bars ban Cams to protect the day jobs and church membership of part time strippers as well as the Senate seat of tonight's #1 tipper.

      As for cam less devices. Nothing wrong with having a low end device. I.e. In a courtroom, You don't need a high frame rate or surround sound. Even my lowly old Dell Latitude D620 is overkill for legitimate courtroom usage.

      Phones are a bigger problem. It's getting real hard to find phones with Email, 3G and WiFi without a built in Camera.

      I'm shocked nobody has capitalized on this to release "Cam-less mods" for those Blackberrys where the cam can be hidden and crippled by changing the user removable back panel for one without the lens opening.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    8. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then take the laptop apart, take the camera out, and put the tape overtop of the hole.

    9. Re:Step back a bit... by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The main thing wrong with having a low end device is that you end up needing two devices. One for use in the camless environment, and one for your normal work--when the latter would function just fine for everything if it didn't have the camera.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    10. Re:Step back a bit... by femtoguy · · Score: 2

      I have a 1/4 inch drill bit that can disable any camera in any device in minutes, and I think that any security guard would be able to see that it would never work again.

    11. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take it easy, the dude's a "Mac guy".

    12. Re:Step back a bit... by jman11 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Morning, I'd like to introduce you to Mr Warranty.

      Oh, you two have already met and broken up.

      OK then forget I ever spoke.

    13. Re:Step back a bit... by waveformwafflehouse · · Score: 1

      Or just take a sharp object and destroy the lens, maybe even pry it out.

      Seriously, if you never use it it's just bling.

    14. Re:Step back a bit... by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 0

      I have a 1/4 inch drill bit that can disable any camera in any device in minutes, and I think that any security guard would be able to see that it would never work again.

      The problem is that in most of the courthouses and high security facilities I've been in don't determine whether or not there is a camera in a device by simply visually inspecting it. They figure it out by seeing the camera electronics in an x-ray. If this is present then the general rule is that it is not allowed through regardless of the optics or it being disabled. Honestly I can see why as it wouldn't take much to make something that would allow you to simply swap out the bad optics for ones that work once inside the facility.

    15. Re:Step back a bit... by TClevenger · · Score: 2, Informative

      A P38 can opener, for those of you who don't know, is quite possibly the least expensive can-opener possible. It could be accurately be described as a "hinged razor-blade."

      I don't know about new ones, but mine's from the 80's and is dull as can be. Still does a great job on cans. I've carried through airports and courthouses all over the US and Europe on my keychain, and it's never been a problem.

      They're less than a buck, and a great thing to have on your keychain.

    16. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT HTH HAND

    17. Re:Step back a bit... by meerling · · Score: 1

      And if you're worried about being accused of trying to trick the security chimp, then have a thin panel of (metal, plastic, whatever) material superglued over the camera lens. There's no way a rational person will accuse you of trying to sneak in a camera.

      If you're worried about looks, have the panel cut clean and neat and matching the case color.
      You may even preserve you're warranty as you didn't open the unit to do this job required modification.

    18. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are, e.g., BlackBerry setups where the camera can be completely disabled by the admin pushing the config onto the device (through BES). I don't know of a way for the end user to hack around that (though I wouldn't be surprised to learn it's possible).

    19. Re:Step back a bit... by blincoln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As for the cameras issue. That is legit. Not only do courts sometimes deal with cases where identities must be protected (I.e. It's bad enough little Sandy has to testify against her Daddy for molesting her, but putting her picture on the net would make it a whole lot worse) but there are other "institutions" that have vested interest in being photograph free. I.e. Many titty Bars ban Cams to protect the day jobs and church membership of part time strippers as well as the Senate seat of tonight's #1 tipper.

      The ability to effectively enforce a ban on cameras is something that's only possible for the current relative sliver of history. What are those organizations going to do when technology allows virtually anyone to covertly record what they see through their eyes (organic or cybernetic)? They should start thinking about that now, because in the not-too-distant future they will have no choice but to allow it.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    20. Re:Step back a bit... by jsiren · · Score: 2, Informative

      A P38 can opener, for those of you who don't know, is quite possibly the least expensive can-opener possible. It could be accurately be described as a "hinged razor-blade."

      The very least expensive can-opener possible is a P38 without the hinge. A fancy Fiskars version, which is about 5 times more expensive than the usual non-fancy version.

      --
      Usage: km/h for speed (kilometers per hour); kph for very slow impulses (kilopond hours).
    21. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohhhhhhh hark at her can get ones panty's in a bunch pull them out luvey.

    22. Re:Step back a bit... by icebike · · Score: 2, Informative

      The a third party "repair" sites that specialize in removing cameras from phones, such as the iPhone. (Your warranty is removed along with the camera).

      These guys do a pretty good business around military bases where high value assets are located, such as most Navy Bases and some Air Force bases. You often can not have a cell phone with a camera on such bases, (especially if you are a civilian employee/contractor).

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    23. Re:Step back a bit... by icebike · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > There's no way a rational person will accuse you of trying to sneak in a camera.

      We are talking about a security guard.

      You know, the same guy that use to beat you up in 10th grade just because he could. The guy that couldn't pass the police physical or the written test.

      Getting caught (by what ever means) with a camera you KNEW was there, AND one that you tried to hide can cost you big time. Your Job. Your security clearance. Maybe a couple years of your freedom.

      Telling them you read it on SlashDot won't save your sorry hide.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    24. Re:Step back a bit... by icebike · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And the security guard knows its "completely disabled" HOW???

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    25. Re:Step back a bit... by icebike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ah, not, that's not true.

      You can not tell a camera's electronics from a cell phone's electronics. None of this stuff can be distinguished on Xray. Even a cam embedded in a laptop can't be distinguished from the other electronics in the device.

      They see your cell when you go thru the scanner (you put the phone in the basket before going thru).

      They have been trained to look for cameras built into computer bezels (even tho 98% of them face the computer user, not the courtroom).

      They do it with eyeballs, not Xrays.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    26. Re:Step back a bit... by bacchus80 · · Score: 1

      Isn't having a built-in audio recorder of some sort the same? The issue is capturing some sort of evidence rather than taking pictures only, using any kind of portable device. Audio recorders are much more common and they would either have to be removed from the device or be disabled permanently. You can't just cover them up. Mobile phones have had audio recorders long before they had cameras due to the obvious fact that they've always had microphones.

    27. Re:Step back a bit... by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      I recently served in the submarine force (USS Nebraska), and your statement regarding cameras at these installations is absolutely correct. It's a pain in the ass, but understandable.

    28. Re:Step back a bit... by palegray.net · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That approach works okay until you try to outwit Marine Corps guards stationed between upper and lower base on an installation that holds nuclear submarines. Yeah, you might get away with it once (or even twice), but the consequences of getting caught are rather unpleasant.

    29. Re:Step back a bit... by palegray.net · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you're on active duty in the military, the results can pretty well be summed up as "hey, you're fucked."

    30. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia E51 exists in camera less version.
      Where I work everybody has one.

    31. Re:Step back a bit... by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Too bad the assholes at the base forgot to cover the screws when the google bird went over.

    32. Re:Step back a bit... by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Nokia e61 is an awesome phone with a big screen and a keyboard and no camera. You can even get it to work with push e-mail. Also its kind of old now and cheap.

    33. Re:Step back a bit... by icebike · · Score: 2, Informative

      It wasn't Google, it was Microsoft.

      It wasn't a satellite, it was an Airplane.

      It wasn't secret info any more, and hadn't been for several years.

      http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&FORM=LMLTCC&cp=ryqjpf4s57kc&style=b&lvl=2&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&phx=0&phy=0&phscl=1&scene=10352732&encType=1

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    34. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mother (52 years old) once had to remove a hairpin when enterring at a courthouse. She objected and was threatenned with arrest by the "security" officer.

      I always thought it was stupid that I have to remove my shoes at airports, until on one trip I had my belt buckle confiscated by a screener because it was "dangerous looking metal". I had my hair tied in a ponytail, so maybe they thought I was evil. Nothing makes sense any more when it comes to dealing with these people.

    35. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lazy, snickering security guard ....

      Standard security type.

      I once went to the superior court building for jury duty. As I approached the metal detector, I observed a paunchy, mustachioed deputy (apparently the look is de rigueur for cops these days) strutting around behind the sccured area loudly declaiming, "There is no problem so great that it can't be solved by the application of a suitable quantity of explosives." This, in a building full of courtrooms and judges.

      I can only imagine in my worst, screaming nightmares what would have happened to me had I done the same. The fat son of a bitch would have had his jackboot on my neck on the cold marble floor as fast as he could launch his lard across the room at me.

    36. Re:Step back a bit... by pbhj · · Score: 1

      I'm shocked nobody has capitalized on this to release "Cam-less mods" for those Blackberrys where the cam can be hidden and crippled by changing the user removable back panel for one without the lens opening.

      If the cam is simply hidden then how hard is it really to whip the back off to take a covert photo? I'd have thought some sort of whitelist of the devices that are allowed in the court is best, like calculators allowed in maths exams (in the UK). Still abusable by switching the innards of a device.

    37. Re:Step back a bit... by pbhj · · Score: 2, Funny

      What are those organizations going to do when technology allows virtually anyone to covertly record what they see through their eyes (organic or cybernetic)? They should start thinking about that now, because in the not-too-distant future they will have no choice but to allow it.

      Blindfolds are cheap, they'll need foil linings to avoid people have IR (or other non-visible spectrum receiver) eyes though.

    38. Re:Step back a bit... by auric_dude · · Score: 1

      I work in such a place but have an eidetic memory and that is one of the reasons why I work in such a place.

    39. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, filter what they see using software.

    40. Re:Step back a bit... by rhathar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whaaaa? Assuming whatever you want about the poster (who knows, maybe he is an asshole?) that doesn't make his story any less valid, if true.

      --
      http://www.chaotickingdoms.com
    41. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run into folks like you at work all the time. Most of us just refer to you guys as assholes. It's astonishing to me how arrogant people can be.

      I'm ultimately the one that's going to have to look for any IEDs that somebody might plant in my part of the building as well as screen vehicles coming in. I get that you make more than I do, but that's really no reason to act like such a jack ass.

      Maybe that's why you make so little. You completely missed his point that he was given a pass because of what he was wearing, while his charge (maybe their relationship wasn't even obvious) was singled out for inspection.

      When I run into pretentious jerks like you who think they can lord it over their betters because they have a little tin badge, I also refer to them as assholes.

      Feel better about yourself now?

    42. Re:Step back a bit... by smoker2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know it's not exactly stress free working at one of the top hundred terrorist targets.

      Is that in the top hundred by actual attacks committed, or just estimated by some politician to be worthy of using to scare people. Do you know how many terrorist attacks there have been on US soil between 1961 and 2003 ?

      7

      And several of those were cases of one man with a mission, which we normally call "criminals" not terrorists. So explain the top 100 terrorist targets please. You have way more attacks in schools than you do terrorist incidents.

      http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ho/pubs/fs/5902.htm
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_school-related_attacks

    43. Re:Step back a bit... by MrPhilby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Prick

    44. Re:Step back a bit... by MrPhilby · · Score: 1

      Drill it out first so that the trashed camera is visible once tape is removed.

    45. Re:Step back a bit... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Any mobile phone is by definition an audio recorder, call up your own voicemail and leave the phone connected. This is why may places ban any kind of mobile phone.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    46. Re:Step back a bit... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      A whitelist would be completely unmanageable... Government lists like that are maintained and updated very slowly indeed, while mobile phones are released and updated rapidly. You would find that the only phones on the approved list would be several years old and no longer available to purchase.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    47. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and by making reference to how much he makes and referring to yourself as "his better" just because of this, you prove the point that you are an arrogant ass who's opinion matters not at all.

    48. Re:Step back a bit... by Monsieur+Canard · · Score: 1

      Hell, I built those submarines (well, not all of them and I had help) and I can't have a camera at work. I hate having to shop on the "special" shelf at the phone store.

      --
      He took a duck to the face at 250 knots.
    49. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll need a government permit to have that kind of implant installed. Otherwise you will be shoot on sight by your friendly robot guard. Just pray there isn't a database error while looking up your permissions.

    50. Re:Step back a bit... by bwcbwc · · Score: 0, Troll

      I note that the state department list conveniently excludes any mention of the activities of the Puerto Rican independence movement, including their attempt to assassinate President Truman in 1952 and shooting (non-fatal) holes in several US congressmen at the capitol building in 1954. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rican_independence_movement

      (And yes, I'm aware of the irony of my current sig in this context...)

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
    51. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are those organizations going to do when technology allows virtually anyone to covertly record what they see through their eyes (organic or cybernetic)? They should start thinking about that now, because in the not-too-distant future they will have no choice but to allow it.

      How much time do you want them to spend thinking about it, and why? Today they can take reasonable steps to protect little Sandy when she gives her testimony. At some undefined point in the future they might not be able to (or they might be able to press a button and have all cameras jamed in the courtroom, who knows?) but today they can protect Sandy. So they do.

    52. Re:Step back a bit... by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 1

      A little bit of paint would destroy the camera in a semi-permanent way. I'd recommend that.

    53. Re:Step back a bit... by zach297 · · Score: 1

      It's hard to believe that it's (much) more dangerous as a slashing implement than most of the other keys on the same keychain.

      From the wikipedia article on the P-38:

      Samuel R. Delany mentions in his memoirs that women in his era (the late 1950s and early 1960s) often carried a P-38 to rip the necks of muggers or rapists.

    54. Re:Step back a bit... by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "specialize in removing cameras from phones, such as the iPhone."

      I was thinking the same thing. Would it be so hard to gently "dig" the camera out of there, then epoxy a small round plastic piece the same size of the hole and the same color of the iPhone? Then when he says "no camera" he can inspect it all he wants and look, no camera. If you wanna get really technical you can use the same techniques used for auto body repairs, with the buffing and sanding, etc. If done right you'd never be able to tell a hole was ever there. Here's a guide on how to take your iphone apart, one section even completely removes the camera.

      If you're not comfortable doing it yourself, iResQ does it for $99, or this guy says he'll do it for $40

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    55. Re:Step back a bit... by elguap0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How dare they leave off those attacks from 1952 and 1954 from their list of terrorist attacks from 1961-2003! Conspiracy!!

    56. Re:Step back a bit... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The real question there, of course, is if any of them were ever successful. Samuel R. Delany's line tells us that some people believe that P-38s are dangerous; but says little about whether they are.

      I suspect that any pediatrician will tell you that people in their practice take antibiotics for viral infections. And that, of course, just makes those people stupid.

    57. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know with Verizon you can order just about any phone they have without a camera, I'm sure the other carriers do this as well.

    58. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The magic solution is a bit of black electrical tape over the lense. If you can't see it, it doesn't exist. I work in a federal building and that magical tape improved everything. And that wasn't just for the old security that'd see me several times a day and would wave me through if I left some metal in my pocket, but that works for the asshole new security that makes me take off my belt because the wand inconveniences them.

    59. Re:Step back a bit... by Neil+Jansen · · Score: 2, Funny

      The least expensive can-opener is actually Chuck Norris's fist.

    60. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, I can buy Chuck Norris's fist cheaper than any other can opener? I'm sorry, but I don't believe you.

    61. Re:Step back a bit... by mokus000 · · Score: 1

      I suspect that any pediatrician will tell you that people in their practice take antibiotics for viral infections. And that, of course, just makes those people stupid.

      As long as we're being pedantic, what that actually makes them is merely "wrong." The cause of wrongness may in fact be stupidity in some cases, but I suspect that in a much larger number a more accurate adjective would be "uninformed." If you feel the need to insult them, carry on with "stupid" but keep in mind that it may make you wrong too, and others might try to explain your wrongness using equally or even less favorable adjectives.

      --
      Additive identity, multiplicative cancellation, distributive multiplication over addition: pick any two (unless 1 = 0)
    62. Re:Step back a bit... by mokus000 · · Score: 1

      Actually, fuzzyfuzzyfungus, you weren't being especially pedantic, and your basic point is one I agree with. In retrospect, I don't know why it irked me so, other than my own need to be pedantic over the "just makes those people stupid" part. I apologize for my too-slow brain-to-submit-button filter. Mentally replace "we're" with "i'm" in the first line of my post, and you'll have what I now realize I should have meant. ;-)

      --
      Additive identity, multiplicative cancellation, distributive multiplication over addition: pick any two (unless 1 = 0)
    63. Re:Step back a bit... by cdrmret · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I missed a chance to have a video cam and voice activated recorder installed when I had total knee replacement this winter. I won't make that mistake again. The way metal detectors and guards treat my knee you'd think it was a nuclear (not nuculer) device. Sometimes its hell getting old...

    64. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have been trained to look for cameras built into computer bezels (even tho 98% of them face the computer user, not the courtroom).

      They do it with eyeballs, not Xrays.

      "Pardon me sir, could you please remove the mirror from your face."

      "They're my sunglasses!"

    65. Re:Step back a bit... by pla · · Score: 1

      The main thing wrong with having a low end device is that you end up needing two devices. One for use in the camless environment, and one for your normal work--when the latter would function just fine for everything if it didn't have the camera.

      Or, you could just buy... A camera!

      I don't (deliberately) buy toys with built-in cameras for the simple reason that they almost wholly suck, and hard. Don't get me wrong, it has perfect focus (as long as you can place it on a flat stable surface - Even the slightest movement results in nothing but blurry streaks), and arguably better low-light performance than my "real" dSLR... But the few times I've tried to snap pics with my phone, I've ended up with a grainy ultra-low quality picture that, with a good bit of cleanup and reducing the size to 25% of the original, might pass as a decent quality thumbnail.

      Webcams and camera phones have their uses. But "photography", amateur or otherwise, does not count as one of them. At best, they "document", by producing recognizable likenesses of people and places (at close-but-not-too-close range).

    66. Re:Step back a bit... by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Warranty on an $x00 device is irrelevant compared to espionage charges, IMHO.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    67. Re:Step back a bit... by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting that the second device would be purchased because it has a camera; it would be purchased because the low-end device is deficient. If you're talking laptops, if you want a decent processor, video card, etc., you're going to have to get something higher-end than the Mini 9.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    68. Re:Step back a bit... by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      Ah, not, that's not true.

      You can not tell a camera's electronics from a cell phone's electronics. None of this stuff can be distinguished on Xray. Even a cam embedded in a laptop can't be distinguished from the other electronics in the device.

      They see your cell when you go thru the scanner (you put the phone in the basket before going thru).

      They have been trained to look for cameras built into computer bezels (even tho 98% of them face the computer user, not the courtroom).

      They do it with eyeballs, not Xrays.

      Granted this was several years ago, and I can't speak for computers, but yes they could tell the difference between camera and non-camera phones. At a court house I used to go to on a daily basis I noticed that every time someone placed their cell phone in the bin to go through the x-ray (or maybe it's something else) scanner no one was looking at them prior to entry and they were picking out the camera phones when looking at the scanner screen. Since I was on good terms with the police at this location I asked about it. They told me that they could see the CCD sensor in a camera phone and showed me the difference. Like I said this was several years ago, so I don't know if this still holds true or not but it at least used to be the case.

    69. Re:Step back a bit... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I think that your criticism was fair to a degree: obviously people wouldn't bother to take drugs that they know aren't effective, so anyone who is doing so is indeed suffering from ignorance. My irritation with them is mostly, I think, because antibiotics are generally prescription drugs, so anybody taking them for viral conditions is a)ignorant and b) willing to harass their doctor until he gives in and gives them what they want, rather than accept that, for viruses, there really isn't much to be done.

      Ignorance is perfectly understandable; but aggressive ignorance that would rather do the wrong thing than do nothing rubs me the wrong way.(not that I made the distinction properly clear in my original post, of course.)

    70. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take it easy, the dude's a Mac "guy".

      Fixed that for ya...

    71. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck!?! are you stupid or something ??

      The fucking quote you copied is him saying that there are NO devices that do what he wants ( email .. wifi .. 3g ) that DONT have a cam.
      That he will have to get a LOW END one to ALMOST do what he wants without the cam .. then get the one that does do what he wants BUT INCLUDES A CAM AS DEFAULT ...

      HE DOESNT WANT THE FUCKING CAMERA YOU IDIOT.

      Because the cam is default , he CAN NOT use it during the day at work .. So he has to have TWO. One with ( because thats the only thing he can find that does what he wants ) and one without ( to use at work )..

      How in the world did you read that as him wanting the cam part ?? Seriously what the fuck are you smoking .. AND why are you not sharing..

    72. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then take the laptop apart, take the camera out, and put the tape overtop of the hole

      Why bother with taking the laptop apart?

      1. Get a battery powered drill and a suitable bit, a 4.5mm bit worked fine on my brand new MacBook...
      2. Some of you may want to look away now...
      3. Drill through the lens of the built in camera...
      4. Fill in resulting hole with two part epoxy putty in the appropriate color...
      5. Patent the process...
      6. Profit?
    73. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying that the base allowed a phone if you claimed that some 3rd party disabled the cam on it ??

      If that is true then you are saying that the base used a "Default permit" rule with trust that the intruding party would self identify the threat.

      Not the most secure methodological approach.

      I would have hoped that it was a default deny ( NO PERSONAL ELECTRONIC DEVICES ) with a white list of devices known to not have a camera.

      Much more secure that way. Also would allow you to control devices that can be used to store data

      but if you really wanted to , a 'hidden' usb key probably be just as easy .. perhaps even preferable .. if your into that kinda stuff ;-) .. not that there is anything wrong with that ...

      I have NO knowledge of military base procedures .. I am only speaking from a general security standpoint.

    74. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia E51 exists in camera less version.
      Where I work everybody has one.</p></quote>

      Hey this sounds like just what I want... could you take a pic of it and post it so I could see what it looks like ;-)

    75. Re:Step back a bit... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I'm ultimately the one that's going to have to look for any IEDs ...

      Are those the same as IUDs? Does one have as much fun looking for them?

    76. Re:Step back a bit... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      Bull shit. Security guards don't search for IEDs. Maybe bombs under cars, but someone calls in a bomb threat or some office worker sees a "suspicious" package and everyone calls the bomb squad.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    77. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who gives a shit .. so the list is old .. thats the list .. dont like it leave your device at home .. Dont want to leave your device at home then you cant come in my building. Simple..

      Now whatever you think about life in the public sector .. there will ALWAYS be places where this is true (its my building and my rules) .. Military bases and courts are two prime examples where the risks can be too high to allow a default permit environment.

    78. Re:Step back a bit... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      How often are you opening cans that makes this thing useful? Seriously, I've never once found a use for a can opener on my keychain. And I'm a college student, I'm used to canned food.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    79. Re:Step back a bit... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      If you're not comfortable doing it yourself, iResQ does it for $99 [iresq.com], or this guy says he'll do it for $40 [ebay.com]

      Would you send off your phone to be tinkered with on the strength of an ad on eBay?

      Good luck with that.

    80. Re:Step back a bit... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      Where the hell do you get the "good optics" once you're inside the facility? Do those just get right past security?

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    81. Re:Step back a bit... by pxlmusic · · Score: 1

      the laughing man has beaten you to it

      --
      "If for any reason you're not satisfied with our service, I hate you."
    82. Re:Step back a bit... by CecilPL · · Score: 1

      My wife was just on a week-long school outdoor camp at a backwoods lodge. They did an overnight hike and the group leader forgot a can opener. There would have been no pasta sauce for dinner if she didn't have a can opener on her swiss army knife.

      It's not the kind of thing you use every day (or even every year), just that one time when you really need it.

    83. Re:Step back a bit... by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      By that definition so is any phone. You can still call your voicemail number whether it's from a landline or a cell phone. It wouldn't make sense to ban mobile phones for that reason if they did not also ban all phones.

    84. Re:Step back a bit... by cwike · · Score: 1

      split your losses... Use the p38 on the camera

    85. Re:Step back a bit... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Fixed line phones are different...
      If the line is in their building, then it's under their control and they know where they are all located. Mobiles represent a lack of control, since unknown phones could exist in any location and cannot be centrally monitored.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    86. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hrm. Have you included in your statistics all incidences of improvised explosive device detonations?
      How about all spree-style killings?
      All of the law enforcement officers shot or injured in a courtroom?
      How about robbery attempts that end with the shooting or assault of a security guard or law enforcement officer?

      The focus on terrorism is bogus. Not all idiots (criminal or otherwise) are interested in terrorism. That doesn't make them any less lethal if they have the intent and ability to do harm.

      Keep in mind that the pay rate for most of the people that die to make sure you can mock them is significantly less than the average /. poster. And they put up with significantly more bulls**t and stress from both the public, management, and other members of the same community than your average /. participant.

      Or maybe you think they've NEVER heard that bit about your strap, keys, or your shoes as a biological weapon fifteen thousand times before?

    87. Re:Step back a bit... by professorflipwig · · Score: 1

      Mobiles represent a lack of control, since unknown phones could exist in any location and cannot be centrally monitored.

      Except with a Faraday cage...

      --
      Hostes futuri sint socii.
    88. Re:Step back a bit... by quonsar · · Score: 1

      It worked for the TSA...

    89. Re:Step back a bit... by Vastad · · Score: 1

      Certainly.

      So long as you don't consider the collateral damage and the bill from FEMA.

    90. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why so much of "security" is a joke. If an organisation isn't going to do it thoughtfully and properly, then stop wasting people's time and money. You can't even blame the security guard in many cases. They are most often simply following the rules someone else has laid out for them....and they have no power to change it. The inertia this builds up in an organisation and a society can be incredible.

    91. Re:Step back a bit... by Supergibbs · · Score: 1

      Simple, destructive solution: small chisel and hammer...you get the idea

      What? You said you never use it anyway!

      Fine, how dumb is the the security guard? Would tape fool them?

      --
      First post! (just in case I am...)
    92. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia E-61 off ebay. High end, runs Symbian, very adaptable and camera free.

    93. Re:Step back a bit... by pev · · Score: 1

      What you've asked doesn't really back up your question. It'd be interesting if you'd asked "Do you know how many attempted terrorist attacks there have been on US soil between 1961 and 2003 ?" though...

      The number "7" that you quote is only the number of successful attacks. Does this number indicate of a low number of attempts or a high success rate of prevention of attacks by authorities?

    94. Re:Step back a bit... by pev · · Score: 1

      Well, people don't have keys taken off them because nearly all the population have an obvious need to take keys around with them. How many people have an obvious need for a can opener on the move? You got to admit that it's not exactly normal in the same way carrying keys are.

    95. Re:Step back a bit... by jknapka · · Score: 1

      I'm shocked nobody has capitalized on this to release "Cam-less mods" for those Blackberrys where the cam can be hidden and crippled by changing the user removable back panel for one without the lens opening.

      Uhh... "user removable" probably has something to do with it.

    96. Re:Step back a bit... by anyGould · · Score: 1

      The least expensive can-opener is actually Chuck Norris's fist.

      I'd disagree - do you know how much it costs to rent Chuck Norris for an hour?

    97. Re:Step back a bit... by grub · · Score: 1

      Who's the $20/hour techy? I'm confused.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    98. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of unrelated to the actual subject matter, but it's interesting that you have to mention the hourly wage of the security guard. It just kind of comes across as elitist and bitchy. God forbid some schlep doesn't make $100k/year.

    99. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The simplest fix would be an ice pick jammed into the lens.

    100. Re:Step back a bit... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Zzzzz..

          The idea of "We've stopped this many attacks", and information coming out where federal agents have encouraged stupid people to follow the agents plan, and finally bust them for it, does not constitute a real threat. That is unless you consider the largest threat to the security of the United States of America to be it's own government.

          As for the number of "terrorist" attacks, that number is very low, but it's in how you look at it. A terrorist manipulates a group with fear. Serial killers, rapists, and bank robbers can be categorized as terrorists. We are really looking at the kind of suicide terrorist who straps semtex or C4 to a vest, walks into a crowd, and blows themselves up. They may blow up a city bus, car, or air plane, or crash any of the above into a target. Those numbers have been relatively low.

          The middle eastern terrorists aligned with al Queda, our primary focus of fear in the second view above have struck one day on American soil. Still, the government has guided the people into a constant state of fear, where the citizens have allowed their own rights to be quickly eroded. If an officer of the state wants stopped you to search you, regardless if you were doing anything wrong, you would accept it. If you refused, you would be physically compelled to their will. This is not the free America that our forefathers envisioned. We have rapidly declined to the state that our forefathers were fighting against.

          But, that's how things go. Everything is a circle. We have not, and will likely never, learn from our own mistakes. We are doomed to repeat them.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    101. Re:Step back a bit... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Hi there Mall Ninja, how they hangin?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    102. Re:Step back a bit... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      What Martian invasion?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    103. Re:Step back a bit... by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      Where the hell do you get the "good optics" once you're inside the facility? Do those just get right past security?

      Considering they are glass, thus no issues with a metal detector, and usually rather small, they could simply be kept in a pocket.

    104. Re:Step back a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the "Land of the Free", we shouldn't have to have a reason to carry something relatively safe. "Just Because" is good enough for me.

      If we allow keys, we shouldn't disallow anything with the same risk profile as a key. Of course, some keys are better weapons than others. I've seen recent model keys that were mostly rounded flat metal that looked like toddler toys. I could see making a key out of exotic materials that would make it a better weapon.

    105. Re:Step back a bit... by Forge · · Score: 1

      Hmm... A Titty Bar where everyone must wear a blindfold?

      They would have no need to employ pretty girls. Just small ones who smell nice. Bad teeth? Discolored skin? no problem.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    106. Re:Step back a bit... by edittard · · Score: 1

      they might be able to press a button and have all cameras jamed in the courtroom, who knows?)

      A button that switches the lights off?

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    107. Re:Step back a bit... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Or a sticker with a logo on it, or see if you can find a grommet the right size.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    108. Re:Step back a bit... by timothy · · Score: 1

      "Well, people don't have keys taken off them because nearly all the population have an obvious need to take keys around with them. How many people have an obvious need for a can opener on the move? You got to admit that it's not exactly normal in the same way carrying keys are."

      It's not as *common,* but it's perfectly normal, in the same way that carrying a pocketknife (often for its non-knife functions, like can-opener) is normal. Not everyone carries a can-opener on his keychain, I agree (I don't, and maybe you don't either), but the courthouse incident all seems pretty silly to me now, even after a year+ of "cooling off time." And while it's not every day, I have several times wished that I *did* carry a can-opener more often, though when I wished for one last month (long story -- I was in a house with no can opener, having just bought several canned items at the grocery), I was on the other side of a plane journey on which I'd checked no luggage; the fees I saved I suppose justified the purchase of a can opener I ended up making ;)

      timothy

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  2. Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've just cruised through this list of netbooks over at Amazon. It returned just over 5,000 results and I can't find one without a camera. I'll keep looking but this leads me to believe that you may just need to look at a regular laptop. And the wait is probably going to exist otherwise because you are obviously looking for something that is just outside the norm for these.
     
      This discussion from last September didn't turn up anything, except the Mini 9 - which you already mention. Though they do bring up one option that I think is the best bet; to open up the case, yank the camera and fill in the spot where it went. It can't be that hard. If some guy can fit an LCD behind the apple logo - you can get the camera out.
     
    The phone issue I find being brought up going back to 2005 and it's probably older - this seemed to offer hope and mentions a few models but it's old and I'm not sure how stuff would have carried forward. Most stuff I find mentions Blackberry which you already have. So my guess is that there is no treasure trove of camera free devices that you have missed. You are just in a tough spot.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      If it has a camera, it will often have to be removed by the IT/Security organization, so it can be properly "signed off." This doesn't happen often, as it often involves a lot of paperwork. Removing it yourself won't work, since it can't be "certified." Also, if the factory spec for the network shows a camera, then it has a camera - unless it's removed and documented by the appropriate people (see above). At least for cellphones, I know the business offerings from ATT have CURRENT cellphones with and without cameras. You won't see the no-camera offerings unless you're looking at their business offerings.

    2. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by drizek · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Oops. Can I mod my own post redundant?

    3. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by supernova_hq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Removing it yourself won't work, since it can't be "certified."

      Drill out the camera with a 1/4" drill bit. Then when the security guy points out the camera hole, SHOVE A PENCIL THROUGH IT!

      Most webcams are on their own circuit board above the display. If you wanted to save it, to put back in later, you could remove the board, then drill out the case.

    4. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by supernova_hq · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nope, you already posted.

      Don't worry, I'll do it for you!

    5. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Or you could just put the "automotive class trim" over it to fool the $12/hr security guard and not have to deal with all the drama, and if you're accused of espionage then peel it off for a minute and stick a pencil through it.

    6. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      I'd drill out the camera, then use epoxy (mixed with the same color paint as the laptop) to fill it in. Sand with 'wet&dry', then polish.

    7. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by Michael.Forman · · Score: 3, Informative

      I work in a very secure environment that cannot have cameras as well. Our cameras are disabled in hardware by opening up the laptop case, disconnecting the camera cable from the motherboard, covering the camera lens with an opaque sticker, and then placing a tamperproof security sticker over a case screw. Our laptops are inspected by our security force by verifying the presence of the opaque sticker and tamperproof security sticker. Almost all laptops have separate cables for the integrated camera, however the unibody 17" Mac Book Pro that I just purchased does not. They had to pull the cable on the camera, Bluetooth, and WiFi all at once. I have to use a third-party wireless card for WiFi now but to me that's just part of the job.

      --
      Linux : Mac :: VW : Mercedes
    8. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I just saw a Linux EEE with no webcam for $229 or so at a Target. 4GB flash model I think. They're around.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by SectoidRandom · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't know what both you and the original question asker are talking about.

      I just went onto Dell's website and looked at the first range of laptops that I would ever consider for myself and NONE of the models have webcams? Why?

      Because I selected 'Enterprise / Corporate' on the first page and not 'Home - give-me-all-your-crap-that-only-the-children-would-use'. :)

      Come to think of it, I've only ever owned one laptop with a webcam, that that was back in the day (>5 years ago) when the only way to get a decent 3d card in a laptop was to go for the home models, since then none of my laptops have them simply because when I buy a laptop I want one designed to work, not look good, etc.

      See:
      Dell Examples

      HP Examples

      BTW, pretty much any business model laptop will include a model without webcam, for the exact reason raised by the original questioner.

    10. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by La+Camiseta · · Score: 1

      So they don't let you have cameras in a secure environment, but WiFi is OK (and don't give me that whole wpa/wpa2 is secure enough - if it's government or important enough to warrant security that high - then it's important enough to warrant some class-a espionage)? Sounds like our government to me.

    11. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      So maybe it's time to accept the fact that cameras are everywhere and drop the camera ban in many places.

      Only very few occasions exists where a camera shouldn't be used. And even the cameras in laptops are often hard to aim at anything else than the person reading the screen.

      If someone really wanted to bring a camera they could probably do it anyway - disguised as something completely different. Just a suit with a lot of bling buttons will completely mess up the X-ray devices. Or hack an asthma inhaler.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    12. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      I use an HP DV4 and after stripping out all the crapware that was preinstalled, its been a really great laptop for software development.

      Battery life could be better, but I suppose running wifi & itunes all the time doesn't help.

      Sure, it has a webcam but I know it can easily be obtained without the camera.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    13. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by UncleWilly · · Score: 1

      I just took a quick look at the Lenovo / Thinkpad site; I just looked at the SL (300/400/500) line and all are available with the No Camera option. I imagine this goes for other Thinkpad series also.

    14. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by ion++ · · Score: 1

      Find a netbook that has a turnable camera. Then forcibly remove the turnable camera. The security guard can then see something is missing if compared to the factory default picture.

    15. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I video conference with coworkers both individually and for group meetings all the time with my laptop. Built in cameras are a must for any company that actually -trusts- its employees.

      P.S. The cheapest asus eee 900a netbook lacks a camera.

    16. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1
      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    17. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by icebike · · Score: 1

      The OP was not seeking ways of sneaking in a camera.

      He was looking for sources without cameras so as to comply with the requirements of his job.

      But thanks for all the wonderful suggestions on how to lose your job, get arrested, disbarred, demoted, thrown in the brig, court marshaled, or spend a couple years being someone's bitch behind bars.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    18. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by el+americano · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They probably just couldn't get behind the LCD to disconnect the camera at the source. That's as far as I got disassembling the unibody too. If you're willing to cut the cable you can keep Wi-Fi and just lose camara + bluetooth.

      If anyone knows how to access the hidden screws in the unibody LCD, please let me know. I'm guessing that a special tool is involved.

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
    19. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bravo, very well done.

    20. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no solution to the notebook side, unless some of the upcoming ARM-based netbooks are willing to forgo the camera for the cost savings. I hope so, because I have no need for the camera either.

      The phone is a simpler solution. The Nokia 6310i. Best cell-phone ever made for those who want just a cell-phone. They're still available used all over the place, and they're pretty much tanks as far as cell phones go, so they do last. I've had mine for about seven years now.
      I haven't confirmed it, but I've heard Nokia has even been making some limited production runs in the past couple years for Mercedes (one of their lines has/had some nice integration for it), so you could probably even find a relatively recently manufactured one on the used market.

    21. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by JazzLad · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Except you just posted too, no worries, I've got it covered. Oh, wait. Dang.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    22. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      I was just purely noticing the futility in blocking cameras in courts and other places today when you have camera devices everywhere.

      It's not the one that you see that gets you.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    23. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't they just put a marked seal over the camera eyehole (The kind they use for securing stuff)? If you want to get fancy, make it a numbered seal and check it when they sign out.

    24. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      Why not just put the "tamperproof" sticker over the lens itself, no case entry required? Too obvious?

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    25. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Eee 1000H doesn't have a camera, and is otherwise a perfectly good netbook.

      The Best Buy edition of the 1000H cut some corners to drop the cost - they sold a lot of them, although the current models now have cameras. Maybe find a 1000H of 2008 vintage on Ebay?

    26. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A mate of mine worked at a secure location -- so secure that giving a visiting vendor an ethernet drop resulted in on the spot dismissal -- and because he was producing graphics, managed somehow to swing a MacBook.

      Security took a Dremel to the lens surface, polishing it opaque.

    27. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is very little reason for this to remain the case, as some business users do make extensive use of built-in webcams for business teleconferencing. In fact, if you return to Dell's site, and compare the Mini 9 and the Vostro A90 (the Vostro is a Mini 9 relabeled for "business customers") you'll notice that the Mini 9 has an option for no webcam, but a Vostro A90 will ALWAYS include a webcam.

      I worked at a secure facility around the time Apple released the new Powerbooks with webcams in every one -- all of the scientists I worked with loved Macs, hated PCs, and were mortified that they wouldn't be able to procure ANY of Apple's newest product line at work. I think the facility eventually moved to a in-house "modding" system to remove the iSight cams from the precious Macs.

    28. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by pev · · Score: 1

      I spent three months consulting for a large european mobile phone manufaturer. On the way in to the R&D floor is a huge sign saying "No Cameras" where the security guard sat. What was I helping them develop inside? Their new line of camera phones....

      Of course all the company employees had a lot of pride in the firm and their products too and all had at least one of the company's phones with them normally :-)

      I asked about the sign one day for a chuckle and they said that it'd never been enforced!

    29. Re:Sounds like you've covered it pretty well by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      1) The laptop may be permitted to enter/exit the "super high security" areas. i.e. wifi isn't used in the same place the cameras aren't allowed, but it is used elsewhere.

      2) Most corporations assume WPA/WPA2 is not secure enough and treat the WiFi network as an untrusted external network (despite the WPA/WPA2) and require VPNing into the corporate intranet in addition to WPA2 security.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  3. thinkpad by b0b0tiken · · Score: 2, Informative

    check out the T400 or the T61 if they still sell it.

    1. Re:thinkpad by AaronW · · Score: 1

      I have a T61 and it has an integrated camera. I don't know if it's available without one though.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    2. Re:thinkpad by skavenger · · Score: 1

      I have a t400 without a camera. It's a great piece of equipment. It would certainly fit your needs but seems a touch overkill unless you're working with a limitless budget.

    3. Re:thinkpad by rnaiguy · · Score: 1

      No camera on my T61

  4. Peers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look around at what your peers and colleagues are using. You can't be the only one trying to bring portable devices into those places.

  5. epoxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just take some opaque, permanent glue (epoxy will work) and cover the lens with it? you can even sand it and paint over it.

  6. Always present... by Boombox2003 · · Score: 1

    The problem is that companies see a camera, no matter how basic, as a selling point that is easy to impliment. As shown by the dated camera added on to the iphone. Its a cheap and easy feature that most people look for in some incaranation on their phones. Its not their fault its the way people are they always want everything , it doesnt matter if its sub par as long as its there.

    1. Re:Always present... by zippthorne · · Score: 2

      A cheap camera on a cellphone actually is a good thing. It's a camera that won't be in the bottom of the glove box with dead batteries (or, in earlier days, expired film) when you need it (e.g. after an accident, or when corrupt cops are putting some minority "in his place.")

      It's really quite a shame that certain environments need to restrict their presence.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  7. dude.. by joocemann · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The answer is simple. Break the camera device. It won't break your computer or portable. . it will break the camera.

    Make it so it is obvious when you point it out.

    1. Re:dude.. by (H)elix1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      A sticker over the lens will usually keep the casual inspector at bay...

    2. Re:dude.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Get or make a sticker that looks like a product logo or souvenir sticker and won't look too out of place. If you are really stuck place several stickers in different spots as well. Like bumper stickers on a well traveled car. That should take care of up to the $25/hr security guard. :-)

    3. Re:dude.. by ykiwi · · Score: 1

      A sticker over the lens will usually keep the casual inspector at bay...

      Failing that just apply force using a pointy object or a drill.

    4. Re:dude.. by Propaganda13 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Make a sticker with Certified by and Do Not Remove Under Penalty of Law on it. Scribble a name and date on it.

    5. Re:dude.. by compro01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Reminds me of when I worked for the Saskatchewan government. Every piece of hardware has a "Property of GOS" sticker on it, with an item # and barcode. The various people (Crown prosecutors, etc.) who needed to disable the camera on their provided phone/blackberry/etc. would simply have that sticker over the camera lens.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    6. Re:dude.. by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 5, Funny

      I always just cover it with my thumb when I open the lid to show them that there's no camera. It's foolproof!

    7. Re:dude.. by oneplus999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A sticker over the lens will usually keep the casual inspector at bay...

      Except, on the off chance that they do find out it's still functional, he could be in trouble. Since he clearly has no interest in ever using the camera, it would seem like painting over the lense with black paint would be the easiest way to convincingly break it.

    8. Re:dude.. by bughunter · · Score: 2, Informative
      The last question my employer asked me during the conversation in which I accepted their offer of employment was "Mac or PC?"

      On my first day, I was issued a Macbook Pro with a disabled camera, and a sticker adjacent to the lens reading "this camera has been physically disabled per [companyname] policy."

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    9. Re:dude.. by multimed · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking 'cept since he mentioned Mac & that's what I'm typing on now, I figured, just get one of those silver-metallic markers & cover over it. It should keep the vast majority of people away, it can't be peeled up like a sticker, should pretty effectively disable the thing.

      But then, if the issue really is high-security type places, then bottom line really would be completely removing the camera.

      --
      Vote Quimby.
    10. Re:dude.. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be convinced myself, as you would still have an imaging device with all the associated circuitry to make it work, except it has a messed up lens. It wouldn't be that hard to make a camera out of it again. Your best bet, assuming that trying bring in something like an old SLR lens would be suspicious, would probably be a small magnifier/magnifier glass of some sort. But you could also use a marble - either a round one or one of the squished ones you could probably swipe out of a vase somewher in the office, a light bulb filled with water, a peice of bubble wrap filled with water, or even a patch of tinfoil with a small hole cut into it with a thumbtack. Sure, the quality may be bad, but if your goal is to copy documents good enough that they are readable, it could be good enough.

    11. Re:dude.. by zztong · · Score: 1

      When I worked in a secure facility in the Air Force, we wanted a tape player so we could have music, but we could not have a tape recorder. We bought a boom-box, removed the recording head and the record button and then agreed the boom-box was to become Air Force property and that it would never leave the office.

      That satisfied the security office.

  8. Simple, really. by buss_error · · Score: 1

    A glob of two part epoxy over the lense should do the trick for you.

    (Someone else asked about black berrys)

    On a crack-berry, if you don't WANT to read the emails
    when you take it out of the hoslster (like, to answer
    the PHONE), drill out the magnet in the holster.

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    1. Re:Simple, really. by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Especially since, done properly, it's easy to install as a fake and pop right off for when you do want a recording of the judge's hijinx in the court room

    2. Re:Simple, really. by Morkano · · Score: 1

      Drilling out the magnet will prevent it from going to sleep when you stick it in there, fyi. Bad for the battery life.

      --
      Victory or awesome!
  9. These places should do what others do by ggendel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Many high security establishments, both government and commercial, realize that they can't stop technology without serious concessions. What some do are to put a special tamper-proof tag over the camera. Then they just inspect the tag when you exit and, if tampered, confiscate the device until it can be validated.

    1. Re:These places should do what others do by BitterOak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many high security establishments, both government and commercial, realize that they can't stop technology without serious concessions. What some do are to put a special tamper-proof tag over the camera. Then they just inspect the tag when you exit and, if tampered, confiscate the device until it can be validated.

      What good would confiscating the device after the fact do? If these are really "high security" establishments as you say, wouldn't they be concerned that you might "tamper" with the tag, use the camera to photograph or record video of sensitive materials or discussions, then encrypt and transmit said photos or videos to a far-off website, all before leaving the establishment? Confiscating the device at that point would be like closing the barn door after the horses escaped.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    2. Re:These places should do what others do by Korbeau · · Score: 1

      A special tamper-proof tag? Do you mean all my consumer electronics contain a special spying camera?!

    3. Re:These places should do what others do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will not work with phones as you can send the pictures and then delete them later. Plus, the damage you can do is much greater than the cost of the phone. Usually you get banned from the site, not nice if your job depends on it.

    4. Re:These places should do what others do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they something that makes a lot more sense. Allow people to have cameras in non-sensitive area and confiscate any phones/cameras in sensitive areas, even if the phone does not have a camera.

    5. Re:These places should do what others do by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they'll know which stable-boy's ass to fill with firecrackers!

    6. Re:These places should do what others do by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True high-security environments are designed against RF leakage, although as the poster states, such environments wouldn't allow a camera in to begin with. Actually they usually prohibit cell phones of any type, so it's all moot. It's sort of overkill, because there's nothing to keep people from remembering what they see, and if they work there they probably see quite a lot. Such schisms are typical of government though.. place armed guards at the entrance who will let you in with a dollar bill wrapped around a credit card (back when IDs were green). I'm certainly not going to enumerate current security vulnerabilities, but I will say that whoever coined the phrase "security theater" was pretty much on the mark. Most security works as a deterrent, and only sometimes as actual prevention.

    7. Re:These places should do what others do by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

      Well if the area was sheilded so you could not make a wireless connection then you would have to store the data on the device.

    8. Re:These places should do what others do by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The problem that I see is that these kinds of devices are pretty obvious about containing a camera. I'm sure a dedicated microcamera using the same kind of module and some compact electronics could be better concealed than an iPhone or a notebook computer. I think one can be easily made that's about the size of a dinner mint with inexpensive and mostly off the shelf parts, if you don't require a screen.

    9. Re:These places should do what others do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because removable media haven't been invented yet?

    10. Re:These places should do what others do by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      There are tamper evident labels that cannot be removed and reapplied without ruining them.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    11. Re:These places should do what others do by jman11 · · Score: 1

      If the guy is in there regularly then you probably know who he is and can find them or put surveillance on them if something fishy happens or starts to happen. The problem is if a one off visitor who you will most likely not have as good knowledge of their identity.

      There's some decent security out there. Private companies that have large amounts of fungible goods and do their own security will tend to have it together.

    12. Re:These places should do what others do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just store the information on a SD card (or micro-SD), and stick it up your ass before you leave the building.

    13. Re:These places should do what others do by bendodge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Places that need really good security tend to have it provided by Marines. ;)

      --
      The government can't save you.
    14. Re:These places should do what others do by Strider- · · Score: 2, Informative
      Most high security places I have been don't allow any outside technology to begin with. You walk in the door, lock your phone, USB stick, and whatever else into a locker and take the key. Any remaining bags (Women's purses etc) are hand-searched.

      When you're in a truly secure environment, it's the only way to be sure. On the other hand, I was working on a base once, and after several trips through the security checkpoint, the guards got annoyed and just slapped an "Unclassified" sticker on my laptop.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    15. Re:These places should do what others do by Strider- · · Score: 1

      What good would confiscating the device after the fact do? If these are really "high security" establishments as you say, wouldn't they be concerned that you might "tamper" with the tag, use the camera to photograph or record video of sensitive materials or discussions, then encrypt and transmit said photos or videos to a far-off website, all before leaving the establishment? Confiscating the device at that point would be like closing the barn door after the horses escaped.

      Anything where a tamper resistant sticker isn't sufficient won't allow the device in the first place. Personally, if I had the choice of locking up my phone, or risking jail time because a sticker on my phone got damaged, I'll lock it up.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    16. Re:These places should do what others do by tinrobot · · Score: 1

      You may get the pictures out of the building, but if the tamper seal is broken, you won't get yourself out of the building without being questioned or perhaps even arrested.

    17. Re:These places should do what others do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not always. I remember reading about various Air Force laptops being stolen and classified data being leaked to the Chinese.

      Now if you'd said places that have really good security tend to have it by Marines, that's another story. :)

    18. Re:These places should do what others do by putaro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One would think. I used to work at a major defense contractor that dealt with nuclear materials. There was a five foot high fence around the facility and I knew people who had jumped it (without triggering a security alert) when they had forgotten their badges. Oh, and cars used to get stolen out of the "secure" parking lot on a regular basis.

    19. Re:These places should do what others do by bwcbwc · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it's a true high-security environment, it's a tin-foil building. Good luck transmitting through that.

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
    20. Re:These places should do what others do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the horse may have left the barn, but you, O horse releaser, are still there, and able to be dragged off to jail. That's a fairly significant disincentive.

    21. Re:These places should do what others do by godrik · · Score: 1

      It would be a good solution if you did not have an internet connection back there.

    22. Re:These places should do what others do by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Ironic sig in context..

      I too believe that Marines should be the ones stuck with standing watch on any base, regardless of the branch, but unfortunately I couldn't convince my superiors to make it happen.

  10. Just read specs - plenty of items out there by SydShamino · · Score: 1

    I attend several film festivals each year, which include several world premieres and advanced screenings. Some of those festivals can be pretty picky about even camera phones.

    I guess I don't understand the original question. There's no secret website where all the items lack cameras, but almost every site lists a full spec for their products, including the presence (or lack of) camera. There is a market for those that don't want cameras, so devices exist and will continue to exist.

    Instead of an iPhone, I have an iPod Touch, which costs half as much, has no monthly fee, and has all the same features except the cellular service, an external mic and speaker, and the camera. Then I have a phone that can do text and voice but, again, lacks a camera. My laptop has one, but I'm not taking that into movies all the time. If I was, I'd have ordered one without it and waited for it, just like you did with your Dell.

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    1. Re:Just read specs - plenty of items out there by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      There is a market for those that don't want cameras, so devices exist and will continue to exist.

      Maybe where you live, but here in the UK, there is a market, but no product.

      We want the Nokia E61 (Not the E61i or E71, which have cameras) updated to have the nice big keyboard, not a fiddly little one (so we can enter part numbers and long tech words), accelerometers and GPS - BUT NO DAMN CAMERA!!!! So it can be used in secure workplaces AND SPECIFIED FOR CORPORATE USE IN SAME.

      YES, NOKIA, THIS MEANS YOU! You would get huge corporate contracts if you just got rid of the damn camera.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  11. Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Conceal the camera somehow, if it's obvious. That's what I do if I'm somewhere like that with my phone.

  12. Black Electrical tape? by madcat2c · · Score: 1

    or white out? lol

  13. keep digging, Watson by KillerBob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Choosing an option without a webcam isn't why you had to wait for your Mini 9. When I ordered one (64GB HDD, Ubuntu, 2GB of RAM, no webcam) I got it inside of a week. Chances are the reason you had to wait was because you chose a common configuration that everybody else was ordering.

    You could also look at a larger screen size of a notebook. Again with Dells, you can quite easily specify no webcam option. It's actually a charged upgrade for them to get the webcam. I'm fairly sure that other manufacturers can also sell you a notebook without a webcam, but HP doesn't sell a consumer laptop with Linux preinstalled. :)

    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    1. Re:keep digging, Watson by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      Yup, I ordered a Mini 9 not that long ago WITH the webcam and I waited about a month too. I think Dell's just struggling to keep up with demand on the adorable little things.

  14. Remove it yourself by markdavis · · Score: 1

    If it is that important to you, then "remove" it yourself. Probably the easiest thing to do is to find a thin sheet of plastic the same color as the case and epoxy and small piece of it over the camera. This pretty much permanently disables it and doesn't overly mess up the look of the machine.

  15. Drill by emeitner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A drill with a 1/4" bit will surely remove the offending camera from the device and, if done properly, will convince even the $7/hr guards while leaving the device operable. YMMV.

    --
    Guru Meditation #6d416769.21610a21
    1. Re:Drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, I was going to say disassemble the macbook and remove it, but that's a pain the ass. I like your way better.

  16. If you don't mind used... by east+coast · · Score: 1

    I use a HP TC1100 as a portable. 40 gig hard drive, 1 Ghz processor, gig of RAM, WinXP Tablet Edition. It's a tough little machine with a full 1024x768 tablet (stylus) screen.

    You can normally find them with their docking station for about 400 on eBay. It's a great little machine.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  17. No kidding... by modestgeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm tired of not being able to bring my cell phone into the strip club... I don't wear a watch and rely on the phone for time as well as coordination. The last bachelor party we went to ran WAY over because nobody knew the time and where to meet the limo.

    1. Re:No kidding... by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've never been to a strip club that didn't allow phones w/cameras. Taking pictures is another issue, but good luck getting a worthwhile picture without flash photography anyway. (No pun intended).

  18. but there's no way to order a MacBook without by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://images.apple.com/server/macosx/docs/Leopard_Security_Config_2nd_Ed.pdf Page 47: You can also have an Apple Authorized Technician remove the built-in video camera hardware from your Apple computer.

    1. Re:but there's no way to order a MacBook without by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

      Software disabling is *not* enough in these situations, as they anything that can be turned off with software can be turned back on with software

      This has been a problem for quite some time, however, there are some places that are normally camera-averse that don't have the same restrictions on laptops with cameras. (it's a bit more obvious if you're trying to take a picture in a courtroom with a laptop camera, whereas a phone based camera can be more easily palmed

      In other cases, the limitations may be based on the resolution of the camera (you can't use it as easily to make copies of vital documents when it's 640x480) ... I've been told even NRL allows low-res cameras on the base now -- they used to confiscate them at the security gate.

      I remember bringing up the issue of the cameras to an Apple government rep back when they showed their first laptops with them ... unfortunately, it was so long ago that I can't remember what the response was, and I don't work at a place where they're restricted so I've never had to follow up.

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    2. Re:but there's no way to order a MacBook without by iamacat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just re-read the grandparent post. Apple authorized technician can remove iSight, Bluetooth, etc as needed so you can order your favorite Mac and make it security-compliant.

    3. Re:but there's no way to order a MacBook without by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes there is a way to order a MacBook without a camera. See my reply to this post.

  19. This may sound stupid, but why wait? by nateb · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Why wait to get a stupid notebook/cell phone/whatever when I'm sure you or a friend have a drill? Just drill the damned thing out, and caulk up the hole.

    I'm pretty sure that will convince folks that you don't have a camera installed.

    The Nate

    --
    -- Nate
    1. Re:This may sound stupid, but why wait? by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Or don't caulk up the hole. That way you can shove a pencil through it to PROVE there's no camera!

  20. Toughbooks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could a toughbook work?

    http://www.panasonic.com/business/Toughbook/toughbook-products.asp

  21. You can run OS X on the Dell Mini 9 by kmoorman · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you are a Mac guy with a Dell Mini 9 you can run OS X on it: http://i.gizmodo.com/5156903/how-to-hackintosh-a-dell-mini-9-into-the-ultimate-os-x-netbook

    1. Re:You can run OS X on the Dell Mini 9 by Narishma · · Score: 0

      And what does this have to do with anything?

      --
      Mada mada dane.
    2. Re:You can run OS X on the Dell Mini 9 by broeman · · Score: 1

      I guess it has to do with, that the OP is a Mac fan. But even if you could install Mac OS X on another device than an Apple, you'll be breaking the EULA (if you care).

      --

      (yes this can be compared with sex)
    3. Re:You can run OS X on the Dell Mini 9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, breaking a EULA that has not been tested in court and that may very well include illegal terms ...

  22. military solution by v1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The US govt bought some macbooks without cameras. I don't know if Apple removed them before selling to them, or if they had a 3rd party doing the removal process. What I DO know is they were manufactured with the cameras in them, and removed after production and packaging.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:military solution by paxswill · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can get Apple to remove the camera. I remember reading in a security document about disabling the camera. An option listed is to have it removed by an Apple service center (an Apple Store might do it, but unlikely), and they'll make a note of it in the Applecare database. You get a warranty, no camera, and access to secured areas.

    2. Re:military solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USN buy a serious batch of laptops every year under the NMCI program. None of them have cameras, Dell leaves them out. There is a lens in the plastic case but nothing behind it.

    3. Re:military solution by gmthor · · Score: 1

      mod parent up please

      --
      How do I uncompress my MD5 archive?
    4. Re:military solution by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Yes, Apple sells camera-less devices to their govt buyers. They sell a LOT of Macs to the US govt.

    5. Re:military solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can remove it yourself to in about 5 minutes with a small screw driver and a bezel tool (eBay for $5). No need for drills or breaking it just unplugs.

    6. Re:military solution by putaro · · Score: 1

      There is a lens in the plastic case but nothing behind it.

      That doesn't sound very useful. How can you tell the camera has been removed quickly?

    7. Re:military solution by tegtmeye · · Score: 1

      Sort of. There is only one Apple-sanctioned reseller that provides this solution-Holman's (www.holmans.com). Last time I checked, it costs 75$ and they claim it is reversible -ie they don't break anything. We have several of their camera-free macbooks. It has it's problems though as you actually 'loose' your Apple warranty. Holman's assumes the warranty so your actually covered but you have to ship the goods to NM for service. Additionally, you don't remove the camera, they just disconnect it. So your 12$ hour security guard may not be convinced that it actually doesn't work. See http://lists.apple.com/archives/Fed-talk/2006/Dec/msg00049.html

    8. Re:military solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US govt bought some macbooks without cameras. I don't know if Apple removed them before selling to them, or if they had a 3rd party doing the removal process. What I DO know is they were manufactured with the cameras in them, and removed after production and packaging.

      I don't believe you. I think they would /at least/ have to unwrap the laptops in order to take out the camera.

    9. Re:military solution by paxswill · · Score: 1

      The document (PDF, page 49) I read implies that any Apple tech can do it, and warranty is maintained.

    10. Re:military solution by tegtmeye · · Score: 1

      Interesting... I agree that seems to contradict what our Apple representative has been telling us (the guy is the Army-wide sales rep, not some random customer-service individual). In any case, the government research lab where I work has a requirement for buying all mac assets from Holman's for the reasons stated above-and in coordination with Apple I'm told. It would be a good thing to know here if it is actually not the case that there is only one path to this end. If your interested, message me directly and I'll give you the rep's contact info.

  23. Fuji P1620 + Nokia 6021 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a Nokia 6021 - horrible horrible phone, but no camera. My Fujitsu P1620 mini laptop (not a netbook - it is actually useful as a primary computer) is 1kg, 9" screen and no camera.

  24. Lots of options, if you know where to look. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ordered a cameraless HTC Fuze through AT&Ts Business Website; many cellular carriers provide modified, sans-camera versions of their popular handsets to businesses only on a hefty discount, so that's worth a look.

    You'd also be surprised at how many camera removal services are out there. There's a local store who will remove cameras from iPhones and cover the lens hole with a piece of cardboard on the inside of the phone (I know, paper + electronics = bad) to show the camera was unusable. Most disassembly guides will cover such removal or replacement instructions.

    If all else fails, talk to the head of security at your facility (Not the guard, but the actual head honcho); he may have recommendations or suggestions as to how to get your personal equipment through screening without permanent modifications.

  25. drill it by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    Either pay more for a device with fewer features, or spend a minute, drill the lens out and plug the hole with some epoxy. Touch up with some enamel paint. If you don't like to do it yourself, any number of repair shops (just about any kind) can do it for you.

    Same way it's usually cheaper and much easier to buy a PC with Windows, delete it and install Ubuntu than try to find a manufacturer to supply it for you out of the box.

    1. Re:drill it by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. If the camera is obviously destroyed beyond functionality, there should be no problem.

  26. Lenovo T series? by mafemmo · · Score: 1

    I bought a Lenovo T61 a year back that did not have an inbuilt camera. Perhaps the newer Lenovo T400s also provide that option?

    1. Re:Lenovo T series? by billDCat · · Score: 2, Informative

      The T60s and T61s still ship without cameras.

  27. $12/hr security guard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does a security guard's wage have to do with his willingness to let you in with an otherwise illicit device that you have given "scout's honor" to be artificially limited by software?

    1. Re:$12/hr security guard? by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      the less he gets paid, the less he gives a shit

  28. Simple: Spraypaint it! by Bobnova · · Score: 1

    For starters the dell outlet always has non-camera mini9's. Beyond that, spraypainting the camera lens would probably convince a $12/hour type.

  29. Get an OQO by clam666 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Get an OQO. Fits in a pocket, full windows xp/vista. Mobile broadband built right in. Extended batteries for hours of use.

    http://www.oqo.com/

    --
    I'm a satanic clam.
    1. Re:Get an OQO by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer a Pandora

      That way I can slack off playing old SNES games like that security guard in the corner. :P

  30. you can get a iphone w/o a camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually you can get a iphone and other equipment sans camera-but its usually a aftermarket modification that removes it.

  31. The easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to a local electronic swap meet, spend $50 on a refurbished laptop. Done.

  32. Pretty strict court houses... by jerquiaga · · Score: 1

    I got called for jury the other day, and I put my iPhone and my MSI Wind (with webcam) down right in front of the security guards and they let me walk right through. Maybe our court house isn't quite as intense...

  33. This will get interesting by Sybert42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's someone who's implanting a camera to replace a glass eye. With the singularity and associated transhumanism, this will get more complicated.

    1. Re:This will get interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look behind you! The SiNgularity! Which is so unknown (not undefined) that it makes whenever that boogeyman jumps out of the bottle to be just a tad more complex than "complicated" yet not unordered. So on the magic day Elvis returns and suddenly reality is replaced with Shodan things will be "really frackin' complex".

    2. Re:This will get interesting by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We will have to pay for remembering songs and movies, not just for watching them.

    3. Re:This will get interesting by Mitsoid · · Score: 1

      Sir, Please remove your eye before entering the court room

    4. Re:This will get interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well fuck that. Pirate everything!

    5. Re:This will get interesting by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      There's someone who's implanting a camera to replace a glass eye. With the singularity and associated transhumanism, this will get more complicated.

      There's someone else who is making a camera that can be fit into a lapel pin for much cheaper than that guy, who is laughing at the cyclopses who waste their money with that guy.

    6. Re:This will get interesting by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Not a problem; much of the content in the last few years haven't been worth remembering anyway.

    7. Re:This will get interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do I get a discount if I volunteer to have my memory of the copyrighted object/event removed?

      And would you mind removing the memory of my second marriage as well?

    8. Re:This will get interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There may even be companies that will remember it for you, at wholesale prices.

    9. Re:This will get interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1160895&cid=27196657

      I posted about this conundrum back in March; you might be interested.

    10. Re:This will get interesting by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      The ominous red glow from that eye will just make the guards cower, they know they can't kill him.

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
  34. Stick a fork in it by Salgat · · Score: 1

    If the thing is smashed in or if you painted over it then it longer becomes a concern.

  35. Spray Paint and Super Glue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a similar working situation. Here, we petitioned to be allowed to bring in devices with cameras. The seriously non-technical solution we arrived at is to spray paint over the lens with the color of the case, let it dry, then superglue a piece of clear plastic over the spray paint. The judges approved of it (and did it with their own devices) and security was notified to be aware of this modification.

    The only issue? Warranty. The solution? Letter from the judge and from the head of security stating why the procedure was necessary, that to their knowledge the manufacturer of the product has no alternatives without cameras, and to please perform a warranty repair on all portions of the device except the camera. Several of us have taken our devices for repairs. Dell cried like a little girl, but was finally convinced. Apple said no problem, but the camera is not covered. Sony said piss off and die. So, your mileage may vary.

    Nevertheless, it works, and a curious security guard just has to pry at it to realize it is not coming off.

    1. Re:Spray Paint and Super Glue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sony said piss off and die. "
                That wasn't because of the camera, that's just how Sony is.

                Really, I've heard of plenty of cases where Sony wouldn't fix a problem on some model, in some cases that was even fixable by a BIOS update.

  36. My sympathies by onyxruby · · Score: 1

    I had to go through that a few years ago. Lenovo sells a number of laptops without cameras, so look at what they have. As for phones, that can be even harder.

    Last time I had to buy a phone like that it took me half an hour to get it through rep's at Verizon's head that I wasn't looking for a cheap prepay phone..... When all was said and done I had a choice of three phones in the store, and had to settle for a floor display for an out of production phone.

  37. An idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could get a HP Mini. The webcam on those doesn't work anyway.

  38. iPod touch = iPhone - phone - camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the iPod touch is basically an iPhone, but with no phone & no camera. Add in a cheap cell phone (have to dig pretty deep to get one w/out a camera) & you're good to go. & for all you security-guard haters, a lot of the alleged $12/hour security guards at federal facilities are US Marshals. Taping over the camera is not going to make them happy, & you don't want pissed-off marshals on your ass.

  39. I disable MacBook cameras every day by scottdmontreal · · Score: 1

    This is part of life at a private high school. The parents have to consent to cameras in the computers, otherwise they are removed. In the current MacBooks you would kill the screen if you unplugged the camera, so we opted for a launchd script that makes sure the camera stays off. The parents are more agreeable to this than the drill-press option. I would be very proud of any grade 9 student that could beat the script.

    1. Re:I disable MacBook cameras every day by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      You never met the grade 9 students at my old high-school! By grade 9 we were accessing restricted network folders, and we didn't even have physical access to THAT machine!

    2. Re:I disable MacBook cameras every day by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 1

      "The parents have to consent to cameras in the computers, otherwise they are removed."

      This is why I'm not too excited by the prospect of schools giving computers to every child. Not that the computers might have built-in cameras, but that the schools are in control of how children use the computers they are required to use for school. It's, potentially, an authoritarian wet dream.

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
  40. $12/hour security guard by drolli · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > Disabling the camera with a script or somesuch won't convince the $12/hour security guard that there's no camera.

    It also would not convince me.

    1. Re:$12/hour security guard by weicco · · Score: 1

      Screwdriver-through-the-lens-protocol works every time. Escpecially if you leave the screwdriver in place.

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    2. Re:$12/hour security guard by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      That data isn't useful until you tell us your hourly rates.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  41. Simple: use sandpaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just buy what you want and hit the lens with some 400 grit or emery cloth. Paint to taste. The camera has been [most likely permanently] disabled in an easily verifiable way without disturbing the electronics. Cruel but effect.

  42. time travel? by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    You could always travel back to 1995 and get one of those Macs...or you could buy an actual business Lenevo, which by and large do not have cameras.

  43. Other devs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many times going into a sensitive computing area all recording devices and wireless devices must be removed. Not only cameras but microphones, wifi, blue tooth. When these devices are built-in it creates problems trying to remove them or disabling them.

  44. Thinkpad, for one by chebucto · · Score: 1

    The (not low end) thinkpad I got a few months ago had the camera as an option. A brief look at other brands would probably reveal the same thing. Hell, you could just ask the other people working there what they use.

    If you love apple too much to lower youself to using a wintel machine, why not get an old mac? The recent macbooks/ibooks may be camera-free. I know that the Pismo (powerbook g3 400/500) series is great, and can run OSX10.4 (haven't tried 10.5, sorry).

    --
    The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
  45. Hot soldering iron tip through the lens by RiffRafff · · Score: 1

    Hot soldering iron tip through the lens. I've heard that works; I've no real experience with it.

    --
    "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
  46. Simple by DirtyCanuck · · Score: 1

    Icepick and hammer

  47. Ever try the oldest trick in the book? by geekmux · · Score: 1

    > Disabling the camera with a script or somesuch won't convince the $12/hour security guard that there's no camera.

    It also would not convince me.

    Outside of a Federal Building, I'm guessing that most places visited have the same $12/hour Security Guard that is more window dressing than anything. "Uh, I left it in my car" in response to "do you have a cell phone?" works more often than not, sad to say.(not that I condone bending the truth or anything...)

  48. You work in a federal court? Where's your ID? by TreyGeek · · Score: 1

    You work in a federal court? Where's your ID that lets you walk by the US Marshall without going through security procedure? You shouldn't have to worry about cameras on your laptop or your cell phone. Even if you don't "Work in a federal court" it is as simple as answering the US Marshall's responding to the question, "Do you have a camera on that thing?", "No Sir." I've passed by a US Marshall manning a metal detector too many times to know this should work.

  49. I'm amazed at how many say "Put some tape over it" by Yosho · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or paint, or plastic, or whatever.

    Do you really think the guys he works with are so stupid that somebody won't eventually say "hey, is that covering up a camera?" then peel it back and discover the camera there? And then the guy in question will get fired and probably face legal charges for knowingly bringing a functional camera into the place.

    You're best off just getting something without a camera, really. If you absolutely have to get a device with a camera, find a technician who will physically remove the device for you. The feds do not appreciate people who think they can half-ass security measures and get away with it.

    --
    Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  50. What's wrong with the touch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iPod Touch doesn't have a camera. If you are willing to put the phone on that list, why not the touch??

    1. Re:What's wrong with the touch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no phone maybe?

  51. Device in a courtroom? by pcfixup4ua · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it be better to not permit cell phones or computers in these areas? (Courtrooms in particular?)

    1. Re:Device in a courtroom? by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      Computers are useful - even in courtrooms for journalists who may wish to take notes.

      The real issue is not court rooms; it's high security establishments, where the employee may want to bring in a personal mobile phone. The simplest way of protecting the area is to disallow bringing in personal electronic devices. That's a bit harsh, since some people may want to bring in iPods and the like to listen to music (specially programmers, but I can think of lots of other people who would too).

      There's a growing trend to make every mobile device a be-all and end-all. Most laptops have webcams integrated and a lot have that shitty "don't boot windows to play your DVDs" mode. Phones are the same - nearly every model has WLAN, Bluetooth, GPS and a camera. It's getting harder and harder to find phones without.

      When companies want their travelling contractors/salesmen to have mobile phones and computers they'll often get one of the you-beaut models but if the employee must enter secure facilities then they can't take them in. Kind of defeats the purpose of having the phone in the first place.

      It's not so hard to get a custom-order Dull without a webcam. Just don't try and do it online. Build the order, save it for later then call up and give the trained monkey the order code and ask for sans-webcam. They will do that for you on most laptops. I haven't tried with other laptop companies. Phones on the other hand; you're S.O.L. You can go for entry level and avoid the camera (there are a few still around) but that'll be a phone which does nothing more than call and SMS people, meaning you also need an entry-level cam-less PDA (They've discovered this wonderful new material called 'paper' that they make those out of now).

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
  52. Re:I'm amazed at how many say "Put some tape over by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    I have spent some time working at heavily secured government sites in South Korea. They check for cameras on the way in. I got caught once by accident. I got it back at the end of the day. But people I work with there all carry phones and all mobile phones in that country have cameras. They just don't use them on site.

    So yes I believe that covering the camera with tape might be acceptable, stupid as that may seem.

  53. Just use stickers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for my government here in EU and cameras aren't allowed, yet I have a netbook and a handy with a camera. How? Easy: I have just covered the camera lens with stickers. Twice the security guard asked whether they have cameras, I showed the sticker-covered lens, and allowed me in.

  54. toshiba portege r500 series by pseudonomous · · Score: 1

    Is a slightly older "ultraportable" that comes without a camera, you can still buy 'em new from Toshiba though. That said, a LOT of older laptops, including older ultraportables, do not come with webcams, and are available much cheaper used then they used to sell for new.

  55. Get the mac you want and mod it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be relatively easy to open the case and physically remove the camera. If you need to, pay someone $100 to do it.

    Remember, you can have what you want without compromise.

  56. 12" G4 Powerbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You said that you're a Mac guy. You've also implied that a netbook would do the trick. 12" G4 powerbook is the closest thing to a netbook that Apple ever made, and I don't even think that a webcam was an option. You can find them in good shape with plenty of extras for around $400 on ebay.

  57. Lenovo x200s? by drolli · · Score: 1

    I finally did not buy it, but i considered it. I seems to have no camera.

  58. Ask security chief or their bosses by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    As crazy as it might sound ask the people in charge of security, or whoever is in charge of giving orders to security. As others have said putting a sticker over the lense might be enough. Sure it will leave a sticky mark, but that is less pain the some of the damage other posters are suggesting. Present them with the issue and let them suggest the answer. If the answer causes you problems then tell them you need a realistic solution that will allow you to get your work done. You'll be surprised the answers and solutions you get when you tell people you can't work because of xyz.

    Asking us, is simply presenting us with a set of assumptions and hoping to find a favourable answer. An analytical solution is a waste of time if the assumptions are wrong.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:Ask security chief or their bosses by krunchyfrog · · Score: 0

      I support this answer. It would be a real shame to drill through your webcamed device to have it rejected again because of stupid security measures, and being told a few weeks later that their IT security tech could have done it the approved way for you (even for free?).

      It's like spending an afternoon making sushi for a friend that finally says "I'm allergic to fish". You could have known it before ;)

      --
      printf($randomline(sigs.txt) \n "-- "$randomline(authors.txt));
      -- myself
  59. Long live transparency in Government! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Long live transparency in Government!

  60. Re:I'm amazed at how many say "Put some tape over by cduffy · · Score: 1

    Re putting plastic over it -- the idea is that this piece of plastic is attached with epoxy, in such a way that it's not trivial (ie. requires tools, and even then will leave visible damage on the underlying surface) to remove.

  61. Re:I'm amazed at how many say "Put some tape over by Kesch · · Score: 4, Funny

    The feds do not appreciate people who think they can half-ass security measures

    I know! They get really threatened by people who try to outdo them at their own job.

    --
    If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
  62. Dell Latitude by ouachiski · · Score: 1

    Most of the dell latitude notebooks dont have cameras on them.

    --
    sorry for my comments, I'm drunk
  63. Look at Fujitsu laptops by HowIsMyDriving? · · Score: 1

    There are many Fujitsu models without Cameras. You can get a Fujitsu 4220 tablet without one, or an E8420. Both are nice notebooks and work great.

    --
    Welcome to the Entropy Bar, may I take your order?
  64. Re:I'm amazed at how many say "Put some tape over by frozentier · · Score: 1

    Or paint, or plastic, or whatever.

    Do you really think the guys he works with are so stupid that somebody won't eventually say "hey, is that covering up a camera?" then peel it back and discover the camera there?

    If you are clever and make it look like it belongs on the computer, then no, they aren't going to ask. A piece of scotch tape will be questioned. An official looking Apple sticker, a sticker with the name of the place you bought it, or a piece of plastic that is of similar material to the notebook housing would probably NOT be questioned, though. As far as paint, I guess you would have to be pretty stupid to think that someone is going to sit there and remove paint from a camera lens in court, or wherever you are. And even if you tried that, you're going to end up ruining the lens getting the paint off, anyway. Anyway, a laptop has so many bumps, buttons, and ridges, that a good paint job would totally camouflage it.

  65. Simple by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1

    Epoxy and some nice looking black plastic to cover the camera. Problem solved. Next?

    --

    Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

  66. Dremel and electric tape. by Destoo · · Score: 1

    That should do the trick. Just cut a hole and get rid of it, then block the hole with black (or whatever color your laptop is) electric tape.

    It's like the pin on IBM laptops that tell the system the display is off and then tries to find an alternate display, messing up the position of all of your icons. Just get rid of it with wire cutters.

    --
    Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  67. NSA Hardening Guide for Macs by chandj · · Score: 1

    As unrealistic as it is, this is straight from NSA's Hardening Tips For Default Installation of Mac OS X 10.5 "Leopard": "The best way to disable an integrated iSight camera is to have an Apple-certified technician remove it."

  68. national labs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guys at LANL have to break their macbooks, I guess the glue solution's been done, but a firmware level break became acceptable at some point

  69. What's the point? by speedtux · · Score: 1

    You can get spy cameras in a ball point pen. And you can easily record audio anyway, which is often worse. If you want to, you can record anything and there's nothing they can do about it.

  70. Logo by Beer_Smurf · · Score: 1

    Stick an official looking logo or brand name badge over it.

  71. Well this worked for some folks by ibm1130 · · Score: 1

    Paint over the lens.

  72. Maybe a more primitive solution is in order... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So first of all I'm pretty sure that the $12/hour security guard won't even see the mac camera or some of the better designed PC cameras..but if he does disable it with a jewelers drill or a bit of epoxy...something physical and permanent. When asked what that is you say "that's where I removed the web cam from this notebook so it would be court friendly"

  73. Removing the camera by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    I too work in a place where cameras and microphones are not allowed. On macs it is very easy to disable these. There is a small harness under the Keyboard you have to yank (then tape to prevent it from rattling).

    The problem is that on many (not all) models this harness also contains the speaker drivers but not the headphones. so you lose all sound playing. This however might actually be a good thing for a court reporter. For me, it means I need headphones to do the training videos.

    You can of course just cut the wires selectively to save the sound out. But that voids the warantee.

    At first I used to wring my hands about doing his to my computer. But then I realized "who am I kidding" it's not "my" computer. Who the fsck cares about resale value. it's not my problem. it's a freakin tool, and if the cost of the tool is anywhere close to what your productivity earns for the company then they hired the wrong person. This was a very easy rationalization for me since it's also the reason I rationalize using a mac over a cheaper windows box. The cost of the tool is irrelevant to it's ability to influence my productivity.

    Now as far as convincing the security guard goes. just gouge the freakin' camera right out. Don't worry about getting it back. If that cost bothers you then again you are not worth your salary.
       

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Removing the camera by Mjec · · Score: 1

      "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power"-- Mussolini

      [Citation needed]

      --
      "But everyone should know everything." -markab
    2. Re:Removing the camera by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power"-- Mussolini

      [Citation needed]

      Here's your citation

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    3. Re:Removing the camera by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 1

      From Wikipedia: Some critics equate too much corporate power and influence with fascism. Often they cite a quotation attributed to Mussolini: "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." Several variations of the alleged quotation exist. However, no text written by Mussolini has yet been found with any variation of the alleged quotation.[32] Despite this, the alleged quotation has entered into modern discourse, and it appears on thousands of web pages,[33] and in books,[34] and even an alternative media advertisement in the Washington Post.[35] However, the alleged quotation contradicts almost everything else written by Mussolini on the subject of the relationship between corporations and the Fascist State.[32]

    4. Re:Removing the camera by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      I have no idea who wrote that in wikipedia but I've actually read a number of history books on this and that quote is actually a good synopisis of il duce's view.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  74. How about covering it with a blank cover? by mr_stinky_britches · · Score: 1

    How about covering it with a blank cover? You could have it match the rest of the laptops lid or however you wanted.

    --
    Censorship is obscene. Patriotism is bigotry. Faith is a vice. Slashdot 2.0 sucks.
  75. Thinkpads! by PhuFighter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hmm I don't think that only low-end laptops don't have cameras. I have an admittedly out-of-date but still relatively powerful Thinkpad T61p. No camera - security at my work prohibit them as well.

  76. How about a backing plate swap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you take the route of using a backing plate from a non-camera version of your phone on your camera phone? I haven't looked into this with my HTC Touch Pro but I would consider it a potential option.

    I'm of the mind that a law or policy should prohibit actions over possessions but that's another issue in and of itself.

  77. molten plastic or epoxy by ZeroNullVoid · · Score: 1

    molten plastic or epoxy

    Heck make it reflective red and black around it and call it your hal eye

  78. Re:I'm amazed at how many say "Put some tape over by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    The feds do not appreciate people who think they can half-ass security measures and get away with it.

    Shows what you know. That majority of "fed security measures" are nothing more than CYA. They have procedures, they follow the procedures, they are not allowed to color outside the lines of the procedure even if it is painfully obvious that doing so would be required to have effective security. As long as the official procedures have been followed nobody gets fired or even reprimanded if there is a real security failure.

    It is painful to have to deal with this check-list security because anyone with half a brain knows that real-life never follows procedure.

    So go ahead, do a half-ass job, in fact do a no-ass job, as long as you get it written down an incorporated into the check-list of security procedures for that site you are home free.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  79. they have to trust you anyway by speedtux · · Score: 1

    A piece of tape says "I realize I'm not supposed to use this, and it takes more effort to use it than just turning it on".

    If you deliberately wanted to violate the camera ban, there's nothing they can do about it anyway.

    1. Re:they have to trust you anyway by Yosho · · Score: 1

      If you deliberately wanted to violate the camera ban, there's nothing they can do about it anyway.

      Yes, that's the point -- restrictions against bringing cameras into places aren't meant to stop people from intentionally breaking the law. Otherwise they could just say "Don't take any pictures"; they're meant to stop people from accidentally breaking the law. It's meant to stop somebody from hacking into your device and making it silently take pictures and upload them somewhere while you're unaware of it. Putting a sticker on there that probably won't fall off isn't an acceptable compromise.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  80. Auto touch-up paint by richardtallent · · Score: 1

    Automobile touch-up paint. $5, paint it right over the lens.

    You can probably even find a match for most common laptops if you look hard enough.

    1. Re:Auto touch-up paint by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Nail polish. You might have to ask a girls for some.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  81. Wrong question by BluRBD!E · · Score: 1

    I'm more of the opinion that cameras SHOULD be allowed in. If it's just regular information being discussed then why the need for secrecy?

    Unless trade secrets that would ruin a company or real national security topics (none of the oh my god terrorism bullshit either) are under investigation... what has the government or corporation got to hide?

    Freedom of information people, it is your right.

  82. Dell Latitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are plenty of Latitudes out there with no webcam. The XT, which I use at work, has no webcam. I believe its replacement, the XT2, also doesn't have any camera. They also offer the 4200 and 4300 models which are relatively portable and have no webcam.

  83. Silly question by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a silly question.

    For the Mac, take it to the Apple store, and ask a tech to open the case. He can remove the camera, control board, etc, etc....

    For most PC laptops, the same can be done by any retailer with a tech on site.

    For the phones, it may be a little harder to get an authorized tech to open it. You may have to ask the store who is a local authorized repair tech.

    If you're not worried about the warranty, do it your self. It's not very hard. If you do it carefully, you can replace the camera later, and if you have to return it for warranty work, they won't be able to tell.

    In any of those cases, I recommend keeping the removed parts, should you want to replace them later.

    Another option may be to "decorate" the case. Home Depot sells glue backed foil for sealing air conditioning ducts. No, not "duct tape", it's foil tape. Some have written marks, and some don't. I'd go with the unmarked ones. Carefully line the edges of your display with the foil, so it doesn't look ugly. Voila, no camera.

    Or option 3.. Bust out the camera with a drill or punch, and fill the hole with a dummy plug or epoxy.

    Since you're in a real security environment, I'd go with options 1 or 3. Option 2 can open you up to liability. Since the camera still exists, you're just hiding it, you could in theory uncover it, use it, and then cover it again before you leave the facility.

    I used to work in a few pseudo-secure facilities. Their rules were that no recording devices of any sort were allowed on the premises. They were datacenters, so the most I could really get was a picture of what other providers were using. Really, that could prove embarrassing if say I came out of an Equinix facility, showing that the IBM enterprise eBusiness managed hosting service was just a mess of desktops and rackmount machines, badly cabled, in partially filled racks at best. Since they advertise that they have their own facilities, even knowing that they are simply a few cabinets in a cage buried in an Equinix facility would be embarrassing.

    I've seen quite a few "enterprise" providers, who run on a few desktop machines jammed into a cabinet. Then again, I've seen even more "enterprise" providers with beautiful setups. It's funny, their customers never get to see the real setup, but a tech who is there to work for another company gets the full view. :)

    Anyways, I used to carry cameras, my cell with a camera, or whatever I wanted in. It was a simple matter of burying it so deep in my laptop bag that the security guards wouldn't want to dig through all of it. In the same environments, they require property passes to remove equipment. If you have enough stuff moving, you can move extra stuff too. I've accidentally removed more than the pass showed. It wasn't intentional, it's just that we overlooked a piece, and noticed when we cross-checked the list later. It would have been a lot harder to walk in, and then walk out with just one piece of undocumented equipment.

    I've had the same happen with the TSA. They want to search, so I tell them "Go ahead, but you have to put it back like you found it." They unzipper a few compartments, see that they're jammed with cables for various purposes (I come prepared), and then just wipe it down so they can do their attempt at detecting explosives.

    On the TSA explosives testing (as I digress)... A friend was driving me to the airport to catch a flight back home. We had already arranged with another friend to go to a local shooting range. I burnt off several hundred rounds of 9mm, .45 ACP and 12 Gauge, which means I handled plenty of ammunition and the residue was all over my hands, arms, face, and clothes. I also handled my carry on (obviously). I didn't really think about i

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    1. Re:Silly question by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      That bothers me a little. Small arms ammo is chemically very similar to military grade explosives. It's nitrocellulose instead of tri-nitro-toluene and other nitrate compounds. The test should be able to pick it up, because a destructive bomb could be made using nitrocellulose, and an actual terrorist wouldn't leave much residue on their luggage.

    2. Re:Silly question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explosives detectors discriminate against gunpowder/residue. This is for a majority of reasons, a large one being, lots of people own guns, and shoot guns, and dealing with the paperwork of a positive hit for every person going to the shooting range would be expensive and man-power consuming.
      I know this because I've asked our guards. I work at a facility (not telling what ;) that has GE brand explosives detectors before the x-ray and metal detectors. The guards still have to go through them, AR-15s, 9mms, ammo, and all. If the detectors didn't discriminate against munitions residue, no guards would be able to clear it.
      And no, they don't all fire their weapons all the time, so they don't always have residue on them. But they do regularly go to the site shooting range and conduct training on site that uses blanks. It's like laser tag, with machine guns and blanks...I wish I could have a go at it... =D

    3. Re:Silly question by CrazyChinaman · · Score: 1

      Whoops, I totally forgot to login...damn it's way too early/late... Explosives detectors discriminate against gunpowder/residue. This is for a majority of reasons, a large one being, lots of people own guns, and shoot guns, and dealing with the paperwork of a positive hit for every person going to the shooting range would be expensive and man-power consuming. I know this because I've asked our guards. I work at a facility (not telling what ;) that has GE brand explosives detectors before the x-ray and metal detectors. The guards still have to go through them, AR-15s, 9mms, ammo, and all. If the detectors didn't discriminate against munitions residue, no guards would be able to clear it. And no, they don't all fire their weapons all the time, so they don't always have residue on them. But they do regularly go to the site shooting range and conduct training on site that uses blanks. It's like laser tag, with machine guns and blanks...I wish I could have a go at it... =D

    4. Re:Silly question by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          That bothered me a lot.

          The idea of the swab test is that if there's been exposure of any sort it would be detected.

          Like, if "the badguy" were to take a box of ammo, empty the contents into a ziplock bag, and then wash both the outside of the bag and his hands, there should be at least some residue for them to detect.

          It means possibly a couple things to me.

          1) The tests they run are worthless. The machines don't do anything, but are an expensive ruse to keep the illusion alive.

          2) They aren't deploying fully functional machines at many/most locations, so it would be hit or miss if a bad guy could get through.

          3) The bad guys aren't quite as mysterious as the general public is made to believe. If they were that good to pull off such a large scale attack, wouldn't you think they'd at least been partially successful with at least one by now? I won't go off on conspiracy theories, but it makes you wonder.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    5. Re:Silly question by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          But.....

          In handling the ammo, I should have had at least some chemical residue. Have you ever handled lots of ammo before, and noticed the smell on your hands?

          Ammunition powder makes a good bang, otherwise they wouldn't be used in ammunition. Excluding one type of explosive from an explosives test is stupid. At least it could identify "ammunition powder residue. probable law enforcement. verify and pass."

          Ive checked firearms in as luggage before. Perfectly legally, and all appropriate parties were notified prior and at the time of check in. I never had any funny looks. Then again, I didn't bring ammo either. That's always a pain, when you have to go buy more ammo at your destination.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    6. Re:Silly question by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Just yesterday I experienced the levels of stupidity that airport security has become. My tube of toothpaste had been mostly used up, and rolled up to get at the remaining paste.

      It was still confiscated because the label on the tube said it originally held 125 mL. Never mind that what was left in there was far less than 75 mL, or that security had no problems with it on my outbound trip.

      How retarded is security theatre going to get? Are they going to confiscate empty 500 mL water bottles now, too?

    7. Re:Silly question by mark_wilkins · · Score: 1

      Not surprised you didn't turn up positive on the test. I'm pretty sure those target specific high explosive substances that could be used in small amounts to bring down an airplane, and are not intended to detect common low-explosive propellants like gunpowder.

    8. Re:Silly question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Working as a demolitions contractor I get flagged as positive almost every time they check me for the explosive test. The guys at LAX are starting to recognize me so I am not getting as much as a hard time anymore but coming home I always get hassled. I think gunpowder might be not on the list of what they check, but they are defiantly catching something that I work with.

    9. Re:Silly question by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I don't see why they aren't considering it as dangerous. In the right container, the powder from a single charge could be rather dangerous. The powder from several (say a D cell battery size) would likely be enough to pop a small hole in something. All it would need is a decent container (err, a D cell battery casing) to make it go boom instead of fizzle. If we learned nothing from the Aloha Flight 243, we've learned even a small breach can become catastrophic. Some accounts I've read of that incident indicate a small breach occurred first, which one of the crew was sucked into the resulting hole. The sudden change in depressurization caused the rest of the panel to give way. Sure, it was a damaged plane to start with, but can you guarantee any plane is in good shape?

          I made a decent explosion with black powder in a ping pong ball once. The ball was only half full. We never did find any the pieces.

          While I'm not suggesting that anyone should do it, the rules are so screwy it isn't even funny. A few ounces of toothpaste are dangerous, but gunpowder isn't?

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    10. Re:Silly question by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Well.... yes.

          I've had a drink bottle with me, that I've already drank most of the contents. Forgetting to dispose of it before getting to security, I finish it (not wanting to waste it), and they still make me throw the container away. I would have been happier filling it from a water fountain once I was past security.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    11. Re:Silly question by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      1. Obviously. It's probably just a common myth that the tests are so sensitive that handwashing and bagwashing wouldn't work. A terrorist could probably use the exact kind of explosives the test is designed to pick up, put it into a sealed bomb housing wearing gloves, clean off the bomb housing, and then put it in the luggage.
      2. Eh, I don't think the government is clever enough to save money like that. Even though that is a good idea.
      3. BINGO. Terrorism is an extremely rare event, and a much smaller danger than many ordinary problems in our lives (like car accidents). The reason there haven't been any more terrorist attacks in 8 years is that nothing has changed : terrorists were ALWAYS rare, and 9/11 was one of those times a rare event still happens. I mean, earthquakes and destructive floods are pretty rare in some areas of the country, but every so often one comes along and does some real damage. Dice have no memory.

    12. Re:Silly question by wwphx · · Score: 1

      That's funny. A friend of mine has a job that takes her inside Hoover Dam on a fairly regular basis. They flew up to Vegas and down to the dam then tromped around the site all day, then when they returned to Vegas to fly out, her shoes tested positive for explosives. Everyone else laughed at her as they'd thought to change their shoes before flying. It wasn't a problem as her travel companions explained their jobs and had government ID and vouched for her, but it was still kind of mortifying for her.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    13. Re:Silly question by lee1 · · Score: 1

      Did it not occur to you that perhaps the swab kits are made to search for high explosives, rather than gunpowder?

    14. Re:Silly question by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      I've taken empty bottles through at least three airports without incident--even the guy at the pre-screening counter who hands out the plastic bags waved me through.

      That was over a year ago though. Glad to see the bar on intelligent security policies keep getting lowered.

    15. Re:Silly question by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Policy changes not only by airport, but by the person inspecting you.

          I've flown hundreds of times (at least) since 9/11. I use my passport as my identification, partly so I don't have to pull my wallet out all the time (or keep my drivers license separate) and partly because people get confused looking for info in different areas on different drivers licenses. In my state, it shouldn't be a problem, but when I'm out of state (like, umm, where an airplane might take me), it saves the 30+ seconds of "ummm, where is your name? Oh, ok, where's the expiration date? umm, ok, it's you."

          I keep my passport in a leather cover. It's been in that cover for a while, because the cover was starting to get beaten up, carrying it in my pocket.

          I'd never had a problem until last year. One TSA agent went ballistic because I had it in a leather cover. I may as well have been burning a flag while urinating on a cross and singing in Arabic. Rather, I'm a good white American guy who was tired, and just trying to get on a plane to go home. He demanded I remove it from the cover for inspection. Ok, whatever. It's not like it's superglued in or anything. I asked him when the rules changed, just trying to understand my mistake, and that set him off again. I've never been allowed to put my passport in a cover, and it must be presented without a cover upon demand by any and all federal agents, including himself, and that always has been the policy at this airport and all airports in our fine United States of Amerika. I smiled, said thank you, and once he decided that it was really me, I went on my way. The funny part was, I'd flown through there a few times already that year, and was never asked to remove it from it's cover.

          The cover is a nice cover made specifically for passports. It's embossed with the seal and text, just like the passport cover is.

          I've carried other items through from time to time. For example, screwdrivers that were accidentally left in my laptop bag. I use the laptop bag exclusively when working at a site, but when I'm packing to leave, I transfer all my tools to my checked luggage. Once in a while I miss one. It was caught a couple times, and the TSA agent said "it's ok, it's not of the illegal length", and a few have been seized. What was funny last time I had a screwdriver seized was, there was a pair of scissors in the laptop bag with it. I didn't find out until I was unpacking it at home.

          So, sure you can walk through with an empty water bottle a few times. Don't be surprised when you get face planted to the floor, and body cavity searched because of it. Definitely don't talk back. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    16. Re:Silly question by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          And did it not occur to you that lower explosives could do significant damage?

          But hey, as long as it doesn't happen to me, then it's someone elses problem, right?

         

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    17. Re:Silly question by lee1 · · Score: 1

      I'm having trouble understanding what you're going on about. I didn't design the tests or any of the security procedures. I'm just pointing out that it is (and therefore you are) a little silly for getting exercised because a test that is designed to detect certain very specific organic molecules didn't also detect gunpowder, a ham sandwich, or anything else. A moment's thought, should you care to give it a try, would lead you to the revelation that the false positives that would result from detecting fairly common substances such as gunpowder would render the attempt at explosives detection less than useless. If you are still confused: they are worried about small items that can bring down a plane, and that means high explosives, not firecrackers. But if your expertise leads you to the conclusion that they should redesign their chemical detection procedures, you should by all means share your conclusions with the proper authorities, rather than venting in my direction, despite the urgent temptation arising from having your prolix, rambling slice of your life deflated with a single sentence. I'm sure the DHS will be very grateful to have the results of your research.

    18. Re:Silly question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a silly question.

      For the Mac, take it to the Apple store, and ask a tech to open the case. He can remove the camera, control board, etc, etc....

      For most PC laptops, the same can be done by any retailer with a tech on site.

      For the phones, it may be a little harder to get an authorized tech to open it. You may have to ask the store who is a local authorized repair tech.

      If you're not worried about the warranty, do it your self. It's not very hard. If you do it carefully, you can replace the camera later, and if you have to return it for warranty work, they won't be able to tell.

      In any of those cases, I recommend keeping the removed parts, should you want to replace them later.

      Another option may be to "decorate" the case. Home Depot sells glue backed foil for sealing air conditioning ducts. No, not "duct tape", it's foil tape. Some have written marks, and some don't. I'd go with the unmarked ones. Carefully line the edges of your display with the foil, so it doesn't look ugly. Voila, no camera.

      Or option 3.. Bust out the camera with a drill or punch, and fill the hole with a dummy plug or epoxy.

      Since you're in a real security environment, I'd go with options 1 or 3. Option 2 can open you up to liability. Since the camera still exists, you're just hiding it, you could in theory uncover it, use it, and then cover it again before you leave the facility.

      I used to work in a few pseudo-secure facilities. Their rules were that no recording devices of any sort were allowed on the premises. They were datacenters, so the most I could really get was a picture of what other providers were using. Really, that could prove embarrassing if say I came out of an Equinix facility, showing that the IBM enterprise eBusiness managed hosting service was just a mess of desktops and rackmount machines, badly cabled, in partially filled racks at best. Since they advertise that they have their own facilities, even knowing that they are simply a few cabinets in a cage buried in an Equinix facility would be embarrassing.

      I've seen quite a few "enterprise" providers, who run on a few desktop machines jammed into a cabinet. Then again, I've seen even more "enterprise" providers with beautiful setups. It's funny, their customers never get to see the real setup, but a tech who is there to work for another company gets the full view. :)

      Anyways, I used to carry cameras, my cell with a camera, or whatever I wanted in. It was a simple matter of burying it so deep in my laptop bag that the security guards wouldn't want to dig through all of it. In the same environments, they require property passes to remove equipment. If you have enough stuff moving, you can move extra stuff too. I've accidentally removed more than the pass showed. It wasn't intentional, it's just that we overlooked a piece, and noticed when we cross-checked the list later. It would have been a lot harder to walk in, and then walk out with just one piece of undocumented equipment.

      I've had the same happen with the TSA. They want to search, so I tell them "Go ahead, but you have to put it back like you found it." They unzipper a few compartments, see that they're jammed with cables for various purposes (I come prepared), and then just wipe it down so they can do their attempt at detecting explosives.

      On the TSA explosives testing (as I digress)... A friend was driving me to the airport to catch a flight back home. We had already arranged with another friend to go to a local shooting range. I burnt off several hundred rounds of 9mm, .45 ACP and 12 Gauge, which means I handled plenty of ammunition and the residue was all over my hands, arms, face, and clothes. I also handled my carry on (obviously). I didn'

    19. Re:Silly question by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      A moment's thought, should you care to give it a try, would lead you to the revelation that the false positives that would result from detecting fairly common substances such as gunpowder would render the attempt at explosives detection less than useless.

      Why? The people responsible for creating the policy don't care about false positives. It's not them being arrested, delayed, detained etc.

      As to the ones implementing it, false positives = extra victims for them to bully.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  84. Not in my state... by RJFerret · · Score: 1

    The answer is simple. Break the camera device. It won't break your computer or portable. . it will break the camera.

    Make it so it is obvious when you point it out.

    The posted signage here at the courthouse specifically says that broken/damaged cameras are not permitted either. So doesn't matter how much you point it out, the statute prohibits bringing it in. (Which makes sense, it's easy to make something appear disabled yet enable it later inside.)

    However authorized people who work there are permitted to have phones/devices with cameras.

    What do coworkers do? I'm sure there is some procedure even at the Federal level. Check with security?

    I would imagine it would be easier to get authorized than find alternatives.

    Having options and choice in the marketplace is rapidly diminishing sadly as technology moves "forward" and things have to conform more. The economic situation isn't helping maintain alternatives either.

    It will be interesting in the future when blind people will see via artificial camera eyes that are capable of recording...

  85. remove the camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work at a Dept. of Energy lab, and the supplier we bought our computers from would just open the case of the machines and cut the camera bits out before it got to us.

    Of course, I never got an explanation as to why nobody seemed to care that the microphones were left in the machines intact. The whole point of getting rid of the camera was to avoid recording classified information -- it's not like we only wrote it on the board silently. Nothing was done to prevent laptops from recording conversations.

  86. If you wanted an iphone.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you could just remove the camera... Its not hard to do, just open and unscrew.

  87. Mobile phone cameras by jonwil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the #1 reason its so hard to find a phone with no camera is that the carriers would rather you bought one with a camera (since they can up sell stuff to go with that camera)

    I cant believe that there isn't enough demand for camera phones from consumers for manufacturers to continue to include cameras (being that cameras have a non-zero cost)

  88. Barn door... horses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless they were Venezuelan polo horses... then they might not get far anyhow.

  89. Try the Dell Outlet Store by d8ta · · Score: 1

    They've got a bunch of immediately available Dell netbooks without cameras at the Dell Outlet Store. I just got a 9" Dell Mini, found a 15% discount coupon, and it shipped less than 24 hours after I ordered it. Most of the inventory I saw had Windows XP Home installed. So you run with the preinstalled XP if you like that, or install Linux/go the Hackint0sh route if you prefer something else.

  90. Cameras were banned at my last job by pathological+liar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cameras were banned at my last job. In fact I had to sign several different layers of paperwork saying I wouldn't bring in any cameras, storage devices, blah blah blah.

    What was the first thing they issued me?

    A cell phone with a camera in it.

  91. Loserboy nerds... by JockTroll · · Score: 0, Informative

    ... Put duct tape on the freakin' camera and it's done.

    I've run out of shit, so head out to the nearest public toilet and swirl yourselves.

    --
    Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
  92. Ghost in the shell by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

    Now I have no doubt, in the future people will have their memories wiped by the government inc. routinely and nobody would rise an eyebrow.

    --
    But... the future refused to change.
  93. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the microphone? Are you going to get a build without that as well or do they not care about audio recordings?

  94. Wait a minute... by Neko-kun · · Score: 1

    Aren't we supposed to be technologically competent?

    In regards to the laptops, what's keeping OP, or whoever it applies to, from physically removing the camera from the laptop?

    I know the older MacBook Pro's (i.e. Not the unibody) the process of replacing the display is easily found on the net, and removing the camera itself is just a few extra steps. OS doesn't see a camera and you can't hide what's not there.

    Then again, I did buy a first generation MacBook Pro with a broken display. I swapped out the hard drive for a 200GB while I was replacing the display.
    So if you're one of those who clings to a warranty (har har, I also buy old, used cars!), then you're on your own.

  95. Solution... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Buy whatever device you want....

    Take a small drill and drill through the lens and destroy the sensor CMOS. (Or if you want to be a bit more saavy, disassemble and remove it.) ;-)

    Now you can have a government safe iPhone (okay, so you might have to remove the Wifi, microphone oh and the cell radio).

  96. Hey! I have an answer! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    Change the goddamned law to allow cameras in the court!

    Openness in Government, FTW!

  97. Just disable the camera... epoxy by arete · · Score: 2, Informative

    A camera is something that can take photos, not something with some parts that could have made a camera. So:

    a) pierce the lens if you really want to be crazy, screwing up some nice camera innards. This is relatively risky.

    b) Sand the lens and surrounding area a bit.

    c) Get some good 2 part epoxy and apply over the camera.

    Voila, you no longer have a camera.

    Obviously they won't warranty YOUR CAMERA, but you don't have to open it up. If you skip step a, you're not even 'breaking' anything... but if b/c is right you won't ever be able to use that camera again, because you'll have to break apart the body of the laptop along with the lens to.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
    1. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by palegray.net · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are specific guidelines in place at federal installations that cover this sort of approach. They essentially read "if the device has ever had the capacity to support a camera, it is expressly forbidden in secure locations."

    2. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by ruckc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So my XP workstation at my federal installation job can support a camera via the USB ports. So my computer is forbidden even though its sitting on my desk connected to a federal network, just because it has the capability?

      That is one of the most stupid paraphrased misleading "quotes" i have ever seen.

    3. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Then pretty much all laptops fall under this. They all support cameras. If not built-in they will via the USB port. Even my seven-year-old SonyEricsson phone (T69i or so, I forgot the type number) supported a camera: an external click-on one, but designed specifically for this phone.

    4. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      I have been at datacenters where "USB Devices" are explicitly banned as stated on big signs on the doors and above the security desk outside...
      Yet, most of the servers in there have USB ports, thus making them USB devices. Perhaps i should go in there and remove every server that has USB in the name of security.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    5. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The simple (and hardly unknown) solution to this is called super-glue. If you're putting a machine in a place like that, it's quite simple to make the USB ports not work.

    6. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the case of Apple products, any authorized technician can disable or remove the camera from laptops and desktops. From what I've read, this service is even provided for free. Contact Apple for more details.

      I'm not sure about the iPhone but it's likely they have something similar in place.

    7. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by anlprb · · Score: 1

      Actually, Yes, that would be forbidden in, what I will call a "Secure" facility. HP actually makes a set of computers where the USB ports, and any other IO port are physically disabled. The USB does not show up in the OS because it doesn't exist. Those units also don't have CD-R or DVD-R (of course no floppy as well) and the Video cable is hooked up to a tamper-resistant device. If the OS finds the video has been removed, it locks the workstation and notifies the correct personnel. These are systems where you do NOT play around. So yes, to answer your question, it would be forbidden because the USB port is functioning.

      --

      One Token Ring to Rule them All, One Search Engine to Find Them, One WAN to bring them in, and TCP/IP Bind them...
    8. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Your XP workstation having USB ports is okay (for the time being, at least). Bringing anything that actually take a photo (whether it plugs into a USB port or not) into your installation would likely get you fired at best, and land you in jail at worst. Get it straight.

    9. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by palegray.net · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For God's sake, why can't people understand the fact that "ever supported a camera" means "came with an actual camera installed from the factory?" Are people really this lacking in common sense, or do they think they're being clever by playing semantic games?

    10. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that include optical mice, because they are all built around simple cameras? Normally the image is processed on the mouse, but most of the chips can be requested to deliver the raw image. The image quality is not pretty though, but a camera is a camera nonetheless.

    11. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      How the fuck do you install anything on those? How does it "inform the proper authorities" if ALL of the I/O devices are disabled?

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    12. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      Right, because the government isn't interested in semantics at all.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    13. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by ruckc · · Score: 1

      network boot, instead of booting off of a drive of some sort you can boot off your network if its configured for dhcp and a bootp or pxe boot server.

    14. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      It's the output devices that are not allowed or locked down. No CD/DVD burners, floppy drives, or USB ports (to put on a flash drive.) So basically you can't use any sort of removable media and you can't hook up the VGA output to a device that can record it.

    15. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      You don't install anything on these systems, as they're either netbooted or pre-imaged. As for informing the authorities, that usually goes out over the ethernet adapter. For those who think unplugging the network cable will get around this, the switch can notify the proper personnel if it loses connectivity with your NIC or an unauthorized device is plugged into that port. The latter typically results in the port being blocked completely until an investigation has been done. Serious facilities use serious security measures.

    16. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by dynamo52 · · Score: 1

      How the **** do you install anything on those? How does it "inform the proper authorities" if ALL of the I/O devices are disabled?

      You don't install anything on it. He is referring to a managed environment on a secured network.

      --
      Like this comment? I accept Bitcoin! - 153sc8UUBXyp12ofQqfAWDmJrzyiKCYC1x
    17. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      If you are talking about legal requirements here then it should say something like "the device originally comes with a built-in imaging device". Not something ambiguous like "supports a camera".

    18. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "if the device has ever had the capacity to support a camera, it is expressly forbidden in secure locations."

      Hey but wouldn't that mean anything with a USB port is forbidden, because it is capable of using a webcam?

    19. Re:Just disable the camera... epoxy by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      This is a discussion board, and my original post includes the word "essentially." This is meant to cue the reader in that the view expressed is a boiled-down version of the excessively verbose published guidelines on the topic.

      Very few actual lawyers are running around /., and you're still playing semantic games.

  98. If This Is A Standard Government Requirement by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    If this is a standard government requirement common across many facilities than I'd expect there to be a list of approved vendors and products, and that vendors will be making a line of products to meet the requirements of their largest customer.

    Or you could just find out what everybody else is using, rather than reinvent the wheel yourself.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  99. Elitist Pricks by oljanx · · Score: 1

    Just kidding about the prick thing. But seriously, how many people here didn't start out as, or will end up as a $12/hr employee? Leave the security guard alone, you might end up working for him.

  100. don't bring portables by ffflala · · Score: 1

    Go into these areas without your portable devices. No cell phone, no laptop. Et voila.

  101. Same problem/Different Technology by azrider · · Score: 3, Interesting
    A number of years ago, I worked in a DSS Classified Lab as a Systems Admin. Several of us used PDA's to keep technical tips available (as well as the current NISPOM). When PDA's started to ship with wireless, DSS told us (even the SA's who had presumed need to know about everything on every system in the lab) that we could not carry even a PDA w/o wireless.

    Needless to say, productivity went way down.

    --
    And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
    John 8:32(King James Version)
  102. I work in the Court system by pacergh · · Score: 4, Informative

    This includes Federal court and state court.

    Each court is different. You have to know your court.

    First, if you are an attorney, or go to court regularly as a non-court employee (attorney's assistant, expert witness, etc), then you should have at least one non-camera phone. If you can, try getting a phone you can just pop a SIM chip into and out of easily. (Dunno how well that works in the US -- my US carrier was always Verizon, no SIMs.) Or just go Blackberry (that's what I have, and for that reason).

    Second, if you have a reason for needing your laptop this should not be a problem. The prohibition against camera's is not a universal and absolute prohibition.

    If you're an attorney, speak with the judge for your case. Using a Macbook/MBP as part of your trial is fine. Explain to him your situation, explain to him any added measures you will take to cover the camera (such as tape), and he will let you take it through. (If he does not, well, you're an attorney -- I shouldn't have to tell you how to fix it.)

    If you're not an attorney, but are working for/helping one, then speak with the attorney who is your main contact. Explain the situation and offer multiple ways in which the court may be appeased (such as tape over the camera).

    If the judge knows who has the cameras and something then gets out, there will be no problem. The full wrath of the court can be directed at you for breaching the court's trust.

    If you truly think you NEED the laptop while in court for something other than the case, why? Either you work there, and then you simply need to ask your supervisor/employer for permission, or you don't and there's no reason for you to be chilling in the courthouse browsing the internets and Twittering with Ashton. (And if you're media -- seriously? No excuse for that, either.)

    As for other non-judicial sensitive areas, you're on your own. If I ran a security team at a secure business location, I'd likely not even allow in mobiles to begin with. Regardless, your rights are much more limited in private situations.

    Of course, you could always use the advice of some Slashdotters here. First, since Windows is a pain, either get an Apple service center to remove the camera (or get a Linux machine with no camera). Second, go Windows with no camera.

    Oh, and as for the Dell Mini 9 -- if you are truly an Apple guy, and you get one of these, you better Hackintosh it. I did mine, and it's fantastic.

    Good luck, and have fun.

    - Pacer

    1. Re:I work in the Court system by pacergh · · Score: 1

      Oh, another quick point --

      If you are an IT guy working in a federal court, this also won't be a problem.

      Usually, when you are working for the court, they let you through without checking.

      I externed (like interning, except for school credit and you pay tuition fees for your school . . . which sounds crappy, in retrospect) at a federal court one summer in law school.

      First day I had to register with the federal marshalls, I got a neck ID card I had to carry, and from then on I got to walk through the metal detector without being checked.

      I know IT contractors had similar, albeit limited, arrangements. (For instance, some were issued Marshals as handlers since they were only there for a few hours -- the Marshal would shadow them as they worked. Sounds onerous, but the Marshals and contractors loved it -- they just shot the breeze the whole time.)
      Of course, your mileage may vary. This is one courthouse -- others operate differently. At all courthouses, however, you can talk to people who will work with you so you can get your job (whatever it is) done.

      Usually you just have to ask.

      - Pacer

  103. simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    locate local geek

    say "please remove the camera electronics from my notebook/phone"

    drink coffee

    thank geek and hand over small gratuity

    as for me.... well, I guess I`m a geek, I`d just remove the thing myself and make a blanking plate for the old camera mounting point to keep things neat.

  104. $12 / hour? by zorkdork · · Score: 0

    man this is more than what i make a day!

  105. Let an Apple tech physically disable the camera by chongo · · Score: 4, Informative
    You can have the camera/microphone removed from your Apple MacBook. To quote from the Mac OS X Security Configuration for Version 10.5 Leopard Second Edition, Chapter 3 pages 50-51:

    ''If your environment does not permit the use of the following hardware components, you must physically disable them ...

    Only an Apple Certified technician can physically disable these components without voiding the warranty on your computer. A limited number of Apple Certified technicians can remove preapproved components.

    After an Apple Certified technician removes the component the technician logs a special note with Apple Care, indicating that the computer has had a component properly removed. Most components removed by Apple technicians can be reinstalled, if needed.

    To locate a Certified Apple technician go to: www.apple.com/buy.

    Also, see your local Apple representative for more information.

    Note: If you are in a government organization and need a letter of volatility for Apple products, send your request to AppleFederal@apple.com.''

    FYI: A similar action can be taken for hand held devices such as an Apple iPhone.

    BTW: You can still use an external camera/microphone for services such as iChat on a MacBook where the built in devices have been removed. When permitted, plugging in an external camera/microphone will temporarily restore such capability. Moreover, by physically removing such external devices when they are not in use, you can better control them. :-)

    So buy your MacBook, have a Apple Certified technician remove the offending components, and if needed get a letter of volatility. Q.E.D.

    --
    chongo (was here) /\oo/\
    1. Re:Let an Apple tech physically disable the camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at a high security facility where the unauthorized use of a camera and microphone is a serious federal offense. I also use an Apple MacBook Pro. As the parent post indicates, a special Apple tech removed the built in camera and microphone. They also generated letter certifying the removal and it was sent to the security services of our facility. I do not remember the exact cost for this service, but it was very small.

      I am permitted to use this Apple modified MacBook Pro at the facility. Moreover, I have traveled to other secure facilities with it and have never encountered any problems.

      I had the same modification performed on my personal home MacBook. When I need to video chat, I plug in a firewire camera and microphone. I prefer this configuration because I can better control when they are in use.

    2. Re:Let an Apple tech physically disable the camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We ordered several Apple MacBook Pros. Prior to shipment a Certified Apple tech removed the camera and microphone and generated the letter certifying their removal. The laptops were shipped to our facility.

      While the process took a few extra days, the transaction was very smooth. The service charge was waved by Apple (perhaps because we ordered 5 such units).

      Later, I had the same service performed on my home laptop that was under Apple Care. There was a recall on the logic board, which Apple replaced for free. The tech removed the camera for free. I dropped it off at an Apple Store and the unit was shipped back to me in 3 days.

    3. Re:Let an Apple tech physically disable the camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: "I dropped it off at an Apple Store and the unit was shipped back to me in 3 days."

      Well, actually it was 4 days, if you count the day I dropped it off.

  106. Germany... by deckardt · · Score: 1

    I heard that in Germany, in places where you can not bring some piece of hardware with cam, a disabled (read: physically removed) camera isn't even allowed. Motivation: it can be placed back into the system, when you are in the cam-free-zone. Since the cameramodules are so small I understand this.

  107. Hole punch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    put a hole punch through the lens of the camera...

    a) smartphone problem solved.
    b) laptop problem solved.

  108. And the question answered: by hoarier · · Score: 1

    You can easily find laptops without built-in cameras in stores selling old laptops. Or anyway this household has four laptops (each of minimal resale value), none of which has ever had a camera, and one of which (nine?-year-old Toshiba "Portege 7200") even has a full-sized keyboard designed for fast and accurate typing rather than for looking pretty in the store.

  109. Asus Eee 701 in no-webcam version by tcdk · · Score: 1

    The first and original version of the Asus Eee 701 netbook came in a web-cam free version. I know because I installed a webcam in mine... Can be found very cheaply used...

    --
    TC - My Photos..
  110. Just drill it out!!! by extraqwert · · Score: 1

    Take a drill and take it out!

  111. Nokia E61 by mlscdi · · Score: 1

    The Nokia E61 is a great business phone - QWERTY keyboard, large, comfortable, screen, WLAN... And best of all it has no camera. You can pick them up on eBay for about £50.

  112. Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're making $12/hr, aren't you?

  113. camera clamps for hire, and policy zones by kobotronic · · Score: 1

    The pace of government unfortunately means that much legislation of this type is now, and will for decades to come, reflect a time where a camera was a big box with a protruding lens out front, exposing images on roll film (and music was printed on vinyl).

    Given the ubiquity of camera enabled gadgets that is increasingly going to be needed all day, also when entering a "camera free zone", they will need to come up with some short term solutions.

    Phones have so many shapes and models, and the rentacop guarding the entrance can't be guaranteed accept individual solutions and nonstandardized documentation for disconnected cameras apparently physically still in place. For a long while it is going to be easier and simpler to just outright ban phones from the outside and instead rent out approved dumb and blind phones. Have a phone locker system where you can place the temporarily surrendered phones at the entrance, shouldn't take up much space. In GSM territories swapping SIM cards remains pretty simple. An dumb and blind phone approved for a particular facility could easily be fitted with location based policy awareness so as to for example mute and silence it and prevent any phone conversations or texting or active microphones in a courtroom or other site blacked out on a policy basis. The rented phone also comes with a noise maker and a RFID tag for doorway gates so you won't forget to swap it for your own phone on the way out. Let phone rental fees pay for this program.

    Laptops have microphones and can record and comes in as many configurations as cellphones, but with even greater variety of software. Again the nonstandardized solutions may not impress guards on duty. Microphone recording capability can't be helped, but given that most laptops have the camera placed in roughly the same location near the top center of the screen, you could probably get away with a rental program for little clamp-on lens-blocking boot things that you rent at the entrance and which would make some noise if removed unauthorized. While in place a LED should flash to indicate the gadget is doing its thing so that any officials in a given site seeing a laptop can quickly verify its camera is blocked.

    All this is temporary craziness, on par with archaic and short-perspective laws from back when we went from horse and carriage traffic to automobiles. Eventually we're going to have to figure out a common, open location-based service system accessible by all our mobile gadgets. Such a system would among many practical things offer location based policies that phones and laptops and dedicated recording equipment would understand and could be set to respect, and to provide some manner of verifiable, signed feedback to the system that the gadget in fact is in conformance with the area policy.

    Vernor Vinge has some interesting speculation on how a mandatory enforcement scheme for these kinds of policies might look like in his book "Rainbows End".

  114. easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $5 dollar hammer, 5 cent nail; problem solved

  115. Little Cameras by DanMelks · · Score: 1

    Dike the thing out and either cover the hole so no-one notices the phone used to have a camera or leave a gaping empty hole so that everyone can see there WAS a camera there but not any more.

  116. Break the lense by oneofthose · · Score: 1

    The company I work for physically breaks the lenses of all devices that have cameras in them. I'm not sure what they do but you don't see anything with that camera after they are finished. If it's a plastic lense you could simply destroy it with a hot needle.

  117. Glue plate over camera.... by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Use like 0.2mm-0.5mm brass, Al, copper or plastic and glue it over the camera. Not pretty, but should be on the level a security guard can easily verify. Might even get a laugh now and then.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  118. Re:I'm amazed at how many say "Put some tape over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you are not using the camera.

    Get the courts to create a script to monitor driver activity if you have to.

    Most portables come with (pseudo) physical buttons to disable the cameras.
    Just have someone over your shoulder watching the little LED and alls good.

    If the courts are seriously this stupid, then the people running them don't deserve to.

  119. In a situation like this... by SinShiva · · Score: 1

    i ask myself, 'what would Macaulay Culkin do?'

  120. Cordless Drill + 4/8" Bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cordless Drill + 4/8" Bit. Nuf said.

  121. Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your story is BS because then you have to get the phone past the metal detector.

    1. Re:Fail by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Your story is BS because then you have to get the phone past the metal detector.

      My phone has never set off a metal detector.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  122. Lenovo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go with a Thinkpad. They offer you the option of whether or not you want a camera built in.

  123. Use some JB-Weld by halfdan+the+black · · Score: 1

    If you like Mac Book Pros (so do I), just get some JB-Weld, its basically a really really really strong epoxy which has about the same color as a Mac Book Pro. You can get it an any hardware store.
    Just stick some over the camera hole, let it dry. Or, to match perfectly, again, use JB-Weld, and get a small plug of aluminum, say from a coke can, and glue it over the camera.

  124. Talk to security by Diamon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since it seems you've investigated the technical side of the problem do a little leg work on the human side. Talk to one of the security guards and find out who they report to since ultimately that is who your solution must be agreeable to. Explain the situation and ask what measures would be necessary to take in a device with a disabled camera. You can look at possibly using a case, skin or just a sticker that would obscure the camera just make sure that whoever the security guards report to OKs it.

    Then the next obstacle is getting the guards to understand that it has been OKd. Assuming that there is probably a small number of guards that you'll deal with get to know them and preemptively bring the subject up to them, show them the steps you've done to disable the use of the camera and let them know you've talked to their boss about it.

    Be prepared for them to still balk at the idea and have equipment around that you can use if they wont let the disabled camera pass. Hopefully at this point they will ask their superior about it and he will verify that he gave his OK and next time you'll be able to take your better toys in with you.

    Just keep in mind that the security guards are just trying to do their job to the best of their ability. Things that will draw their attention and almost assuredly lead to your and your disabled camera being turned away/confiscated are any attempts to sneak something past them and any attitude at all if they ask about it. And by all means never wait until discovery/discussion of the device would interrupt court proceedings as that is just a good way to piss of a judge and get yourself found in contempt.

  125. Stickers by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Most of these places are happy if you put a sticker to cover the camera... And most of those $12/hour security guards won't even notice your laptop has a camera if there's a sticker covering it.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  126. why not just mod your notebook? by johnrpenner · · Score: 1

    why not just do it hacker style? get your notebook / phone of choice - take a screwdriver and gouge out the camera - fill with carpenter's putty - done.

  127. Duct Tape? by olddotter · · Score: 1

    Tried the Duct tape option?

  128. Asus Eee PC 2G or 4G Surf (701) do NOT have webcam by lamapper · · Score: 1

    You asked...

    How can one easily find portable devices without a built-in camera?"

    The Asus Eee PC 4G Surf (701) does NOT have a web cam, same price as the Asus Eee 901 which does have a web cam. Since you can run Linux, on it 512 MB of RAM is plenty of memory. I am sure you can still pick one up somewhere, probably get one used and install Ubuntu on it. Ubuntu is one of the many Linux distros that have a build specifically for the Asus Eee PC.

    Biggest issue may be screen size, for a netbook, when I travel this is a perfect size as it fits easily into a carry on, even a purse for the ladies. When using it at home I hook it up to an external monitor, a USB keyboard and USB Mouse. I even use the USB mouse when I travel as I hate those track pads. I picked up the keyboard on sale for less than $8, and the mouse (both Logitech) for around $15. When I am at home, this is not my primary PC, though it is for a friend of mine who blogs and writes.

    If storage is a concern, I recommend getting (either or both) an external USB storage device (500G B or 1 TB, I use the 500 GB Seagate Free Agent without problems, no where on the box does it advertise Linux compatibility, just FYI, so do NOT attempt to install the software that comes with it if you use it on a Windows PC as that will probably introduced problems for Linux systems.) and those Micro SSD memory cards (1 GB, 2 GB, 4 GB or 16 GB I have seen all of these for less than $15 on sale) and a USB adapter for those cards to use in the third USB slot. If you need more USB slots, get a USB extender (plug in one USB and get four more USB ports). I even use a cooling fan at home (mine stays on 24 x 7 running Skype for VoIP calls, its basically my telephone at home). The micro USBs also work with my Nokia N800 (2 built in micro memory slots - I have 2 X 4 GB now, planning on getting two 16 GB micros fro 32 GB on additional storage on my Linux hand held). Yes the Nokia N800 runs Linux, has built in WiFi and it also comes pre-installed with Skype, so if you have WiFi access you have a telephone; chances are you have WiFi access in both work and home, therefore you have WiFi access in 80% of where you spend your time. Nothing like free text messaging (though Bluetooth external keyboard is recommended for the Nokia) of course you have to use the little pin just like other hand helds where the keyboard is displayed on the screen.

    There is room for a GPS module in the Nokia N800, that costs extra, at least it is built into the device like the micro SSD memory slots. The Nokia N800 also comes with a web cam built in and the sound and video quality is excellent. With Skype you can hear a pin drop without headsets, however in a noisy environment you will want an ear bud, at least there is a port for it. The built in microphone is excellent as well. The Nokia N800 is an excellent Linux hand held. Any hand held that will run Maemo will NOT let you down. Do yourself a favor and stay away from the proprietary software ONLY hand helds!

    Battery life is a problem on most netbooks, the Asus is no exception, (you can count on about 2 hours without plugging it in) so you will want to get an extension cord (I recommend the 9' ones so that you can hook up in those ceiling outlets at Panera Breads (free WiFi) when you get

    --
    Is your Internet Throttled? Install DD-Wrt, OpenWRT or Tomato to learn the truth! Google: 1Gbps/1Gbps: 5 Communities
  129. Boges Question by amcdiarmid · · Score: 1

    I call bogus question.

    In a environment as described, everyone knows to buy one of what allready exists. In my office it's a Latitude e6400 (latest and heaviest;). With a PKI card reader. This configuration unit is a US government special. The "Secure Offices" poster is going to have an equilivent set of Super Sucky Specials.

    However, the key is not the purchasing what everyone else has - it's that the question is relatively bogus: In most secure environments, you have to use company equipment, and have papers stating you are allowed to take it out of the building. In the few courthouses I've been in (DC, Ohio; Federal) I was not allowed to bring in electronics. It may be that poster has a specific ? regarding courts - but the question is overgeneralized to the point of misleading: Secure US government facilities don't let you use your own equipment. (My insecure one will let you bring it in, but no touching the network: The night security guys have EEEs with wireless modems for between log checks.)

  130. This might be too simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya know, this might seem too obvious. But how about not bringing the device into the restricted area?

    1. Re:This might be too simple. by rally2xs · · Score: 0

      That's the whole building in my case. I'm thinking of a netbook, and do my searches using the phrase, "optional webcam" Haven't decided to buy yet, but when/if I do buy a netbook or another phone, it will not have a camera. No, damaging the camera isn't good enough. If someone accuses you, you can show 'em the damaged camera, but that doesn't mean you can convince 'em that it was damaged 2 months ago when the secret plans were photographed and sold to the enemy. If they think you did it, you _don't_ want to have such a question floating around.

  131. One nail, One hammer and a small tap. by nasdaq · · Score: 1

    Little paint puddy to cover the opening.

  132. Easily solved... by Cesaro · · Score: 1

    Buy whatever the hell you want and just break the camera with an awl or open it up and remove it completely. Easy peasy.

  133. Stanford prison study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run into folks like you at work all the time. Most of us just refer to you guys as assholes. It's astonishing to me how arrogant people can be.

    It's a phenomena that's been observed over and over again:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_study

  134. Disabling the web cam. by atgrim · · Score: 1

    This may seem simplistic, but, considering all the laptop parts companies out there right now, what about simply ordering a new shell that doesn't have a hole for the cam?

    --
    Your actions in life will determine your children's future.
  135. cell phones without cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, the Blackberry 8830 is a great phone. I have it. But if you want an iphone, talk to the people at http://www.iresq.com. They have an iphone camera removal service, and I'm sure they can document it for you.

    --Sam

  136. Re:I'm amazed at how many say "Put some tape over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have spent some time working at heavily secured government sites in South Korea. They check for cameras on the way in. I got caught once by accident. I got it back at the end of the day. But people I work with there all carry phones and all mobile phones in that country have cameras. They just don't use them on site.

    Things are also a little different in South Korean than they are here. I've worked at a Top Secret/SCI facility there that was basically just a shack out in a field, and in the summer they left the front door open so that a breeze could come through. Something like that would never be allowed under Navy or NSA regulations here in the US; that place would lose its accreditation as soon as somebody heard of it.

  137. Easy Solution by mixmastabinder · · Score: 1

    Power drill. I know of somebody who has actually done this in order to be able to take their iPhone to work.

  138. The reason Blackberries have cameras by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    Because if you are running a Blackberry Enterprise Server you can turn all the cameras off via policies. I worked at a government building and we had a lot of stuff in our blackberries disabled by the admin, the ability to download apps, go to certain sites, or remove the password. That's why they make them with cameras because if they are being managed correctly, it isn't an issue.

    1. Re:The reason Blackberries have cameras by cbreaker · · Score: 2

      Sure, and that will work for when you're using a company issued Blackeberry phone within the company building. But last I checked, the security guard at the entrance of anywhere else doesn't have access to your BES console to make sure your phone is listed on an applicable IT Policy that locks down the camera.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  139. Notebooks without cameras is easy by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    You can get a very high end HP or Dell notebook without a camera/webcam.

    I was once issued a Dell Precision Notebook, completely decked out with BluRay and everything (this is a few years ago - it was a $700 option) and no camera. A year and a half ago, I was issued an HP 8710p - basically the same machine as the Dell but a bit nicer because it was not as bulky but both have 17" screens. Again, no camera.

    So I don't know about the Apple computers, but on the "everyone else" front it's easy to get an amazing desktop-replacement notebook with all the bells and whistles and no camera. In my experience, the camera on the top end notebooks from these manufacturers is optional. At least with the business-centric machines.

    Apple notebooks aren't targeted for the business, and neither are certain lines from the big others, but at least with the big others you have options.

    Phones are a different story, but you could use some sort of permanent adhesive to cover the camera. But I'd make sure that would pass as acceptable before doing it.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  140. Remove the camera... by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    Why not find what you want, and remove (or have someone) remove the camera. Yes, you'll have warrantee issues. But if you're otherwise stuck, it is a route to consider. Remove the camera, from the inside, apply tape or trim over the glass opening from the inside. It will clearly not be a camera that works.

    And, in response to another poster (who said automotive trim might fool some, but when you're caught with the camera still being there, you lose your job), if someone does think you're hiding something, and tries to prove you have a camera, they'll be wrong. The camera won't show up in software, and if they open up the case, there will be no camera there.

    It would at least give you the option of getting the hardware you want, sans camera (and yes, sans warrantee; although one could always put it back to send off for service).

    If you're not comfortable opening up the equipment, there are many qualified people who are.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  141. Back on topic... by danwesnor · · Score: 1

    There are places that will remove the camera from an iPhone, probably a MacBook also. Just Google it.

  142. Cover it by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    My camera lens if always covered with a finger print.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  143. What about unpeel sticker upload photo lose camera by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Just having a sticker isn't any good. Why? If someone is really interested in the data, they can peel off the sticker, take the photos, e-mail them, and then ditch the camera.

    No one checks to see if you come out with LESS stuff than when you came in.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  144. 1000HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My EEE 1000HD came with no camera and it's been fantastic with me. I'm not sure if it's the standard with the model, I picked mine up from best buy a while ago.

  145. Re:Asus Eee PC 2G or 4G Surf (701) do NOT have web by godrik · · Score: 1

    oh shit. This is one of the most detailled post I read on /. thanks man!

  146. Nokia 6210 by julian_t · · Score: 1

    Finding phones and computers without cameras is a pain. I am, however, waiting for a digital SLR containing a phone...

    For those times when I have to go into 'no camera' environments, I use a Nokia 6210 phone. In fact, I tend to use the 6210 a lot, because it is a nice phone and isn't burdened with all sorts of mediocre battery draining extras that I don't need. The laptop is more of a problem, and I normally end up using a PDA if they're fussy.

  147. Just take it off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's quite easy to remove a laptop webcam since you usually only have to open the monitor. More than likely there are two screws holding it in place and a single removable cord connecting it to the motherboard. After which you can just pull it out.

  148. install a plastic or metal cover over the web cam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The webcam on my glass macbook is virtually invisible. If one was to stick a highly tinted plastic film over that section of the notebook the camera would dissapear. You could install a white or silver or black plastic piece over a webcam on most notebooks and fool the average stupider than dirt security monkey. For the Blackberry curve a custom back with no hole for the camera would cover up the camera quite nicely and be good enough to get past most security guards.

    The other solution which is quite a bit more obvious is just to find another job. Companies with idiotic restrictions tend to find it difficult to find and keep people. The job market is so good for high end professionals that many of my colleagues will just ignore companies that want to do invasive checks and have annoying rules. If you really look only low end and government sector jobs tend to do this anyway.

  149. Or buy an older laptop... by Zitchas · · Score: 1

    Since you mentioned preferring to use Apple's stuff, buy yourself an older laptop. You don't have to go back too far before they stop having cameras. That being said, I'm currently using an iBook that's well into it's 7th year, and still works great. It won't play the latest games, and doing large scale graphics is slow, to say the least, but otherwise it works quiet well. Just find one that hasn't been abused.

    --
    Z
  150. Public buildings and procedings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    State, Federal, local court houses all operate on tax monies. As such they are public entitites and are here "to protect and serve" us(no, its not just for police, its for all public servants).

    As such, they are PUBLICLY funded and need to be available for PUBLIC review... I say take your camera in anyway. besides, nothing stops you from recording the more important audio anyway. Oh, and did you notice that in every single courtroom there is at least one camera built in?

  151. Re:Asus Eee PC 2G or 4G Surf (701) do NOT have web by lamapper · · Score: 1

    LOL, I know I get a little wordy, and that is putting it mildly.

    I figured down the road I would parse all my posts, counting the number of words, characters, # of lines etc... just to make fun of myself.

    Granted that is not an original idea, as I saw another person, either here on slashdot or in their blog make fun of themselves in a similar manner. It made for a series of entertaining blog posts. Figure I can list longest, shortest, average, mean, etc.. posts and make fun of myself. Will do that sometime in the next few months as I have NOT picked a blog site yet. And I am looking at them all.

    I plan to run my own blogging software based with PHP and MySQL on a distributed server collocated somewhere. Who knows, down the road I might make two nickels with advertising to rub them together, but I will not hold my breath on that. Just my preference of how I would like to do it. I am a bit of a control nut, if software will not do what I want it to do, I like to be able to make it work for me.

    As to the length of my posts, if I can not make fun of myself, well life is too short. I have a decent sense of humor, love to laugh at myself. In fact while I will defend a point hard and play devils advocate on occasion, I am more than willing to admit that I am wrong once presented with facts that I can confirm. Think quantitative over qualitative when possible.

    Listened to Leo Laporte's twit.TV pod cast today (either it was a live or a rebroadcast, not that it matters). Once again he was stating that for either Apple MacIntosh or Microsoft Windows he would NOT purchase a laptop (or desktop) with less than 4 GB of RAM. Especially considering that memory is so cheap these days. I agree with Leo on that one, though to be less inflammatory in my posts here on slashdot I use the 2GB mark in reference to Windows. (I am no longer a fan.) I just know that if I posted that you MUST have 4 GB to run Windows well, someone would get pissed off at me and accuse me of trying to start a flame war, therefore I just put 2 GB for those situations, like I did above.

    Funny, everyone knows that to run it well you need more RAM, so Leos suggestion of 4 GB or more is probably a correct one. But man will some people (MS fans) complain if you state as fact that they MUST have at least 4 GB of RAM. Sure it will run with less, slowly.

    Another reason I love Linux, I run every day with either 512 MB of RAM on my netbook or 1 GB of RAM on my development tower and love it. If I had 4 GB of RAM on a Linux machine it would be screaming fast with the applications. Perhaps my next purchase I will go for 4 GB minimum of RAM.

    Granted I do not do massive amounts of video editing yet, if I did that I would want a Graphics processor / adapter with a GPU, dual processors and probably at least 8 GB of RAM, even with Linux. Probably could really edit video vary well with Linux and 4 GB.

    --
    Is your Internet Throttled? Install DD-Wrt, OpenWRT or Tomato to learn the truth! Google: 1Gbps/1Gbps: 5 Communities
  152. Re:You work in a federal court? Where's your ID? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    Lying to security guards seems like a bad idea to me. You may get away with it the vast majority of the time but if one does happen to catch you I could see it ending very badly.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  153. The older stuff doesn't have cams by mousse-man · · Score: 1

    If one needs a Blackberry without a camera, the 7130 will do the trick and get you into camera-less environments.

    Else, a Sony Ericsson W950i also fills the ticket, allows thethering and does UMTS.

  154. Re:Asus Eee PC 2G or 4G Surf (701) do NOT have web by godrik · · Score: 1

    Yeah that why I love linux too. It's so fucking small and efficient. And you can strip all those Graphical Useless Item you don't want and keep the exact things you need.

    Since you see, well informed. I am looking for an hand-held (not neccessarily cell phone) such as the nokia N800 you talked about or an ipod. Do you know some place where there is kind of a review of such items I can read ?

  155. camera interdiction by whitis · · Score: 1

    And in the end, all this inconvenience to cell phone, PDA, media player, netbook, and laptop users (not to mention American's with Disability Act violation - some people need cameras) will be about as successful as drug interdiction at the border.

    Joe consumer can buy a camera (still and video with audio) disguised as, for example, a working ball point pen (doubles as a 4GB USB flash drive) for $35.17, delivered (lower end model under $20). Another is rather poorly disguised as an ID badge (required in many places where cameras are banned); poor implementation but you can see where that is headed. Another is disguised as a wrist watch. Another as a necktie. Another small model. Miniaturization has made camera interdiction at the border all but impossible. Unless you are going to strip search and body cavity search everyone, provide them with substitute clothing, and prevent them from taking anything inside, cameras will get in.

    Ironically, before all this stuff was available to the consumer for the price of dinner, there were government facilities that had these kinds of no camera security precautions while on the inside engineers were developing spy cameras that were small enough to circumvent the exact same security provisions at the other country's facilities.

    Miniature equipment has been available for over a hundred years if you had the cash. And if the stakes were high enough to justify banning cameras, the camera cost was minor compared to what the pictures were worth.

    The only difference with your portable electronics gear is plausible deniablity if you get caught before you snap the pictures.

  156. Just get a thinkpad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you can get a fast laptop without a webcam.
    You can order it custom through Lenovo.

  157. Felt pen,My $ 0.02 by fred133 · · Score: 1

    Use a black felt pen,blot out the lens,and you can always use a little alcohol to clean it off.

  158. Lenovo ThinkPad T60 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lenovo ThinkPad T60. Leave it to my company to find the laptop without a camera. Probably didn't want to spend the extra money. It is a pretty decent laptop though. Check out Lenovo, they might have some more laptops without cameras. You may want to narrow your search down to business laptops. I don;t think business people really care what people look like. It'll probably end up being some old bald guy anyways. Good luck with your search.

  159. Great another millionaire you people want me to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    feel sorry for

    little miss rich bitch get 2 devices deal with it

  160. I have the safest one around... by krunchyfrog · · Score: 0

    A 1997 Compaq Armada 1530 without webcam/usb/nic/wifi/bt/whatever. 33.6kbps modem for connection to the outside world unless you add up a pcmcia device.

    Oh, and it has cd-rom and floppy, battery lasts a few seconds and has mmx technology.

    I'll make you a good price.

    http://img85.exs.cx/img85/8145/armada1530d8qv.jpg

    --
    printf($randomline(sigs.txt) \n "-- "$randomline(authors.txt));
    -- myself
  161. Shoot it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about having the $12/hr rent-a-cop shoot the camera with his gun? the 9mm hole it produces should wipe out the camera optics, thus making it non-functional, and the hole itself is proof the camera is gone.

  162. screwdriver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its rather simple to disassemble a laptops screen, just remove the camera physically. just be careful to put all the screws back where they belong. same thing with cellphones, camera modules usually sit in their sockets where they can be easily removed

  163. quick fix by baffo · · Score: 1

    Buy any random computer with a camera, and use crazy glue to attach a small flat piece of metal on the camera lens. Security guards know that metal is opaque.

    --
    Estamos como estamos porquè somos como somos.
  164. Re:Asus Eee PC 2G or 4G Surf (701) do NOT have web by lamapper · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the compliment, however I do not feel that I am that well informed. I would love to get paid to research open source and Linux topics, work from home, but than would not we all. Even better would be to be the Product Manager for an Open Source hand-held running on OS2008 or derivative of that open source operating system. Traveling around the country evangelizing the project to the public, developers, etc... Talk about a dream job.

    My best advice, focus on the operating system and development tools used. If either is proprietary, than you should expect that whatever hardware/software hand-held tools will be end-of-life-d before you are ready to spend more money on updating.

    This eliminates the iPod, iTouch, all the cellular hand-helds and anything running on Microsoft CE from the list. If it is proprietary, eventually you will regret it, so just do NOT go there and save yourself future hassles, in addition to money.

    If you are flush with cash and do not mind throwing out $500 - $2,000 for the latest greatest hand held device every year or two, than more power to you. Given the state of our current economy, I do not know of people that are happy about having to buy a new handset, a new computer, a new gaming system, etc, just to use an application anymore. It really is quite insane when you think about it.

    The only hand held operating system that is completely 100% open source that I am aware of is Maemo. The Nokia N770, N800 and N880 became popular thanks to the OS2008 Linux software. Basically a firmware replacement to the Nokia default-from-the-factory software. Installing it can be problematic without a direct connection to the internet, but far from impossible. I have not looked recently but I know there are more than 300 different applications modified and/or written specifically for the OS2008 Linux software. This is a great place to start your search. Check for other hand-helds, tablets, etc that you could load the OS2008 software on.

    With the OS2008 software it is possible to increase your memory on the Nokia from 128 MB to 64 GB of Flash memory. Not too many hand-helds are open enough to allow for that. If the operating system is proprietary you would most likely be limited by the firmware (think BIOS for hand-held) from going above 2 GB and not for any particularly good reason either.

    I prefer a little larger screen than the tiny cell phones, so I would suggest at least a 4 inch screen, not too small, but not so large that you can not slip it into a pocket, purse, bag, etc. Big enough to watch a video, play a game, and in a pinch surf the internet. At least you can do it with OS 2008, full browser is available and usable on it. I doubt that a cell phone size screen would cut it. The Nokia s 800 x 400 resolution on a 4â diagonal screen is as small as I would want to go.

    So features you MUST have:

    • WiFi enabled device, it should be built in and usable if an internet connection is available. If proprietary software is your only choice, your WiFi could be locked down or encumbered in some way, so beware.
    • Either miniSD cards or regular SDHC cards (their are adapters for the miniSD cards for SDHC size slots for use in hand-helds and cameras today. There are also USB adapters for the micro SD cards, nothing better than pulling a 4 GB, 8GB or 16 GB card out of a camera, putting it into a USB adapter and copying your photos to a computer to be worked with. Fast and efficient.), ideally there should be a minimum of two of these slots on your hand-held. That way you can use one for software and one for data, granted with 8GB and 16 GB memory cards this is becoming a non issue. When traveling, just bring more memory
    --
    Is your Internet Throttled? Install DD-Wrt, OpenWRT or Tomato to learn the truth! Google: 1Gbps/1Gbps: 5 Communities
  165. Manual removal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of these cameras can be pried out w/ a Flathead screwdriver. Sure - it voids the warranty on most products - but at least you don't have to deal w/ the security thing anymore.

  166. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  167. Sorta did that with a Treo 650 by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    For a while the T650 was only available with camera - the no-camera version was released by Verizon 3 months after the camera version (which was held back 9 months so they could cripple the phone, after that contract expired I happily became an AT&T customer).

    When I started my current job, I couldn't bring a phone with camera into the building. So I popped the back off, yanked the camera module, and popped it into a film canister in case I ever wanted to use it again. Never did in the end.

    2 years later my company changed their policy so that cameraphones were allowed if you took a training course on proper use of a camera device within the facility. (30 minutes of training to basically say "don't use it at all" :) )

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  168. Buy an older Notebook by bajaheg · · Score: 1

    My latitude D820 has no camera. Buy a used laptop like D820, there are plenty of lease return vendors. Buying a high end 2 or 3 year old laptop is about as good a low 2 mid level laptop today.