XRDP works pretty well. It's basically an RDP "wrapper" for VNC, and should be secure "enough" for your use.
If you need a GUI for the apps, then you need a GUI for the apps. I wouldn't worry much about the overhead since WINE itself will have much more anyway. We're talking here about under 0.5% of your CPU/Memory, which is trivial.
I like it for conveninece since there's no need to install "agents" or specific client-side software. Any Windows box (Post Win2K) has an RDP client, as do most Linux distros.
That said, there's one caveat to it: WHO'S defect is it? If the defect comes from a licensed library, OS issue, or other hidden cause, then that defect belongs to the source author/vendor.
Sometimes you end up having to work around someone else's crap.
Have case law that females can be shirtless anywhere males can. Otherwise, it hits "sexual discrimination" status, and any arrests/tickets will be tossed in court.
Your greatest heavy metal risk is an object around 100 - 250 grains moving at roughly Mach 1.1.
To avoid exposure, Kevlar is reccomended. To avoid repeat exposure, first puchase a return mechanism, minimum size 9mm, but preferentially.45" in diameter. Second, obtain permission from the Allegheny County Sheriff to posesss such mechanism in any place desired. Third, have such mechanism available.
Seriously - Pitt is in the middle of Oakland, and right next to "Da Hood" (The Hill District). Lived there, been there, avoid it at almost any costs now.
It's a different statute, but similar in how it works.
But it DOES have one potential hack vector...
If the President decides to issue pardons to those who refuse to testify, of do so unfaithfully (before or after the fact) then nobody can be prosecuted. Thus no conviction.
It should be the Congress itself can at least prosecute the case, preferably tried in a joint session, with at least 90% concurrance (maybe 75 or 66...)
...when, after the hotshot lawyers convince them to blatantly violate copyright law, the authors drag their horn-haired asses into court. Suddenly, all the arguments fall flat when reality inconveniently intrudes upon their hotshot lawyer's fantasy world.
Injunctions, major payouts of damages and fees, and having their entire business held in the hands of some "long haired smelly" soon follow.
It's been proven time and time again that the GPL has teeth. Big, sharp, pointy ones. And some of the most tempting works to steal have owners who actually enjoy using those teeth to bite the nuts off anyone who even slightly infringes on the terms of the copyright.
The Busybox devs are a hyper-active active enforcer of the GPL, and it's amazing that anyone still tries to get around it with that project. These guys sue everybody who misues their work, and has been very successful in that effort.
Actually, the PHBs will gladly ignore all input and advice from the lower-rung employees in their company, but will pay close, almost religious attention to the expensive consultant's reccomendations.
The reason? They believe that they get what they pay for. If it's expensive, it must be good.
In consulting work, never try to charge less, but charge more. You get a LOT more work that way, and it becomes less frustrating. PHB types hate having really costly consultant time wasted.
* UNREASONABLE shall not be construed as to exclude hunches, guesses, gut feelings, roadblock searches, or any other reason for a search.
** SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED hereby means "shall not be violated unless we feel like it."
*** Warrants aren't really necessary.
**** Descriptions can be vague and all-encompassing, and nobody will ever be held to account for false Oaths or affirmation so long as their intention was "good" at the time.
Sorry, but in the US, just having the PARTS to convert any firearm to a full-auto is a felony. It is most certainly NOT legal to do that one.
There is a case winding through the courts where a man was convicted because his rifle apparently malfunctioned due to mechanical wear and went full-auto. He was convicted.
While I disagree with just anyone SELLING the drug without a true assurance of what is being sold, I don't believe in making it illegal to BUY it.
Personally, I don't take any of these prescriptions. I had a doctor who told me I should be on an anti-cholesterol drug, based on one test.
The fatal heart attack within a year she predicted did not occur. And I passed every specialist test requested.
She was promptly and uncerimoniously fired.
IMHO, too many Docs are taking too many "freebies" and incentives from the pharma industry to give objective advice.
I doubt many of them are looking out for the interest of the patient. They are looking out for their next quarterly stock statement from a portfolio heavy in pharma.
If it really works, then sure. That is the way to go. If there's any chance of an in-cockpit override (either of on-ground or automated) auto-lander, it could be problematic.
Though the thought of an on-ground pilot landing the thing with an anti-terror cop right behind him, thumb twitching on the hammer of the.45 he's carrying is tempting as another good control mechanism...
Still, I do like the "all automated" system better. It's harder to hack.
Slashdot Mirror
XRDP works pretty well. It's basically an RDP "wrapper" for VNC, and should be secure "enough" for your use.
If you need a GUI for the apps, then you need a GUI for the apps. I wouldn't worry much about the overhead since WINE itself will have much more anyway. We're talking here about under 0.5% of your CPU/Memory, which is trivial.
I like it for conveninece since there's no need to install "agents" or specific client-side software. Any Windows box (Post Win2K) has an RDP client, as do most Linux distros.
I use F9 on a daily basis, and it's a pretty decent (though not great) distro.
...the source of the crapacitors for fraud.
Yes, they are defects.
That said, there's one caveat to it: WHO'S defect is it? If the defect comes from a licensed library, OS issue, or other hidden cause, then that defect belongs to the source author/vendor.
Sometimes you end up having to work around someone else's crap.
Have case law that females can be shirtless anywhere males can. Otherwise, it hits "sexual discrimination" status, and any arrests/tickets will be tossed in court.
But I NEVER see anyone actually do it.
Your greatest heavy metal risk is an object around 100 - 250 grains moving at roughly Mach 1.1.
To avoid exposure, Kevlar is reccomended. To avoid repeat exposure, first puchase a return mechanism, minimum size 9mm, but preferentially .45" in diameter. Second, obtain permission from the Allegheny County Sheriff to posesss such mechanism in any place desired. Third, have such mechanism available.
Seriously - Pitt is in the middle of Oakland, and right next to "Da Hood" (The Hill District). Lived there, been there, avoid it at almost any costs now.
It's a different statute, but similar in how it works.
But it DOES have one potential hack vector...
If the President decides to issue pardons to those who refuse to testify, of do so unfaithfully (before or after the fact) then nobody can be prosecuted. Thus no conviction.
It should be the Congress itself can at least prosecute the case, preferably tried in a joint session, with at least 90% concurrance (maybe 75 or 66...)
But still... Congress calls - you go.
...on the books as a crime.
And how many more tires full of petrol are Brits going to put on these things every week?
They seem to be burning them up pretty regularly over there.
after Bork completes the cavity search.
It's a rather bad idea.
My policy is that I never, ever, under any circumstances even consider thinking about signing an NC. Period. End of story. They are a deal-breaker.
I don't trust anyone who doesn't trust me.
Is an option that I'm seriously considering. Obama and McCain both leave me pretty flat.
It's not mine. You can get the original from http://craphound.com/spamsolutions.txt
...when, after the hotshot lawyers convince them to blatantly violate copyright law, the authors drag their horn-haired asses into court. Suddenly, all the arguments fall flat when reality inconveniently intrudes upon their hotshot lawyer's fantasy world.
Injunctions, major payouts of damages and fees, and having their entire business held in the hands of some "long haired smelly" soon follow.
It's been proven time and time again that the GPL has teeth. Big, sharp, pointy ones. And some of the most tempting works to steal have owners who actually enjoy using those teeth to bite the nuts off anyone who even slightly infringes on the terms of the copyright.
The Busybox devs are a hyper-active active enforcer of the GPL, and it's amazing that anyone still tries to get around it with that project. These guys sue everybody who misues their work, and has been very successful in that effort.
That's just disturbing.
Actually, the PHBs will gladly ignore all input and advice from the lower-rung employees in their company, but will pay close, almost religious attention to the expensive consultant's reccomendations.
The reason? They believe that they get what they pay for. If it's expensive, it must be good.
In consulting work, never try to charge less, but charge more. You get a LOT more work that way, and it becomes less frustrating. PHB types hate having really costly consultant time wasted.
* UNREASONABLE shall not be construed as to exclude hunches, guesses, gut feelings, roadblock searches, or any other reason for a search.
** SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED hereby means "shall not be violated unless we feel like it."
*** Warrants aren't really necessary.
**** Descriptions can be vague and all-encompassing, and nobody will ever be held to account for false Oaths or affirmation so long as their intention was "good" at the time.
At least according to Bush.
Perhaps news reporting should be given a vastly shorter copyright term... say, 1 week as opposed to "forever" as is currently the practice.
Seriously, how much value does a week-old news article have nowadays?
Copyright is great for "expressive works". It's not really good when applied to "facts".
What is wrong with the Drudge Report? Or the Drudge Retort?
I use the Report as a great start page in Firefox. Quick rundown on news, and lightweight.
The Retort is sometimes funny.
WTF is with so many people looking at everything through a prism of politics nowadays?
Sorry, but in the US, just having the PARTS to convert any firearm to a full-auto is a felony. It is most certainly NOT legal to do that one.
There is a case winding through the courts where a man was convicted because his rifle apparently malfunctioned due to mechanical wear and went full-auto. He was convicted.
While I disagree with just anyone SELLING the drug without a true assurance of what is being sold, I don't believe in making it illegal to BUY it.
Personally, I don't take any of these prescriptions. I had a doctor who told me I should be on an anti-cholesterol drug, based on one test.
The fatal heart attack within a year she predicted did not occur. And I passed every specialist test requested.
She was promptly and uncerimoniously fired.
IMHO, too many Docs are taking too many "freebies" and incentives from the pharma industry to give objective advice.
I doubt many of them are looking out for the interest of the patient. They are looking out for their next quarterly stock statement from a portfolio heavy in pharma.
Hmmm.... maybe you have a point here.
.45 he's carrying is tempting as another good control mechanism...
If it really works, then sure. That is the way to go. If there's any chance of an in-cockpit override (either of on-ground or automated) auto-lander, it could be problematic.
Though the thought of an on-ground pilot landing the thing with an anti-terror cop right behind him, thumb twitching on the hammer of the
Still, I do like the "all automated" system better. It's harder to hack.
One accidental click on a link.
That's enough to scar you for life.