The explenation is very simple: we're moving away from an ice age. Yes; look at the north- and the south pole.
An ice age start when there's snow falling and water is freezing, and stays there (in whole or in part) untill the next winter.
The real question is not if there is global warming (there is, simply look at the available data; no need for extrapolating here), but how that global warming is going to affect the human species, in terms of habitablility, or not.
There are two outcomes: 1. It is habitable, or; 2. It is not habitable.
Then the next question, if not habitable: 1. Can we, and should we, adjust the climate? (dangerous), or; 2. Should we change our way of living, like engineering smal biospheres.
I thought everybody converted to Whatsapp, ages ago.
But this does truly starts to axe into Microsoft's dominance. I remember the times where using MSN for chatting on Linux, was such a pain in the ass, everytime they changed the fscking protocol.
Even the MSOffice XML doctypes are losing ground.
I hope this doesn't mean that after the IBM and later Microsoft dominance, Apple will be the next big headache in computing, but that might turn out to be HTMLv5 (hopefully!).
If this is about a critical, large budget kind of thing, then this is so secure that I dare to claim that it is perfect, even though it theoretically is not.
1. Get some general hardware, supported by Coreboot; 2. Examine the code of Coreboot, then compile with a compiler release that is way older than the hardware; 3. Examine a microkernel codebase, newer than the hardware, then only compile what you need, simply because unneeded codepaths that are connected to other code can lead to a theoretical exploits; 4. Encrypt network communications, then bitflip for corruption, and include random noice (Rubberhose File System style); 5. Run a whitelist network packet checker, like Mandatory Acces Controll profiling, for communication. 6. Write application for functionality of computing device, compile for other CPU architecture, and emulate on CPU emulator lib.
Pay VERY CLOSE ATTENTION you what you're about to read, in this post. Agree or disagree, but please do read:...
An evolutionary gene mutation that proves fit, happens once in (if I remember correctly;) 3000 years. (but I might be wrong).
Now, why has society advanced so much over the last 3000 years? Because of the ability to read and write. But that's not all there is to it!
Religion and later governance, has made sure that only the most fit for each particular system, survive. But how exactly does this advance humanity, DNA-wise? The development of human society goes at a much faster rate than that of human evolution... I'll tell you; because there has been only of type of mutation and the rest get annihilated through war, by gene REMOVAL. (by now you're probably frowning upon this seemingly rediculous statemen, but bare with me)
Here are the facts: -We see an exponential increase in psychiatric 'disorders'; -If you put someone with autism under an FMRI, you'll see something interesting; the brains look very similar, but very different to 'normal people'; -War is waged often, and many soldiers die by it; -Autism and ADHD 'patients' can't stay in bootcamp for very long, because they are lacking social understanding, disaplin and/of planning skills (time is a slave driven invention, used my Napoleon, for a reason); -Whenever a war is over, there is alway a birth-wave noticaeble; -We are steadily moving towards Technocracy (DRM, TCP, Intelectual property, patents, centralised information systems like FaceBook, meta-internet development and globalization); -..... Well by now you can draw the fscking conclusion yourself.
So; GET TREATED AT YOUR OWN RISC! You are the future! Look at what interest you at Slashdot! Can you be succesful, making a living with technology? KEEP DOING THAT! Aren't you socialy inteligent enough to communicate enough on/., in the way that everybody doesn't judge you, because of some stupid 'social' expectancies? Aren't you socializing, right here?! Right now?
At some point, the CPU needs to be touched. It's a little technical, but the CPU can only do one thing at a time, and the code can put the CPU in specific states. So when the Vista kernel says: put this into ram and load that page... At which point does the Linux app get to say: "w-wait a second! It's my turn to load some of me there! Hey I want to load that from the harddrive there!"?;-)
Vista doesn't suspend to disk untill you tell it to, and then you need to startup the computer manualy and load up the Linux app;-)
Imagine you have two apps that require two kernels, say; busdrivers, and there is only one bus (computer), with only one steeringwheel and one drivers seat... Well...
Good question. It all boils down to the fact that the operating systems have scheduling differences and can't run together, unless virtualised. Unless you intend to ship a program with all of its dependancies, but I'm not so sure that a simple app plus 123terrabyte of Vista is practical and legal to distribute;-) Let alone run...
1. Kernel name of Windows 7 (NT6.1); 2. Why is file transfer since Vista so slow (introduction of user space driver) 3. Why is Windows 7 faster than Vista (it is not; gui has higher sceduling priority) 4. How much more ram does Vista consume, compared with XP? (wrong; it's less, but why?; Vista caches like preload). 5. Is NT POSIX compliant? Since when and how? 6. What is the main difference between the TCP/IP stack in XP and Vista, other than IPv6? 7. What compiler does Microsoft use, to compile Windows? (not the one they make, hint) 8. Ask something about Powershell 9. Difference between win32 and winRT; 10. Is NT a Microkernel or monolithic (microkernel with servers in kernelspace) 11. Is NT x86 only? (also ppc and titanium and arm) 12. Was Win32 the only planned API to support and why (NT was designed to support a lot more API's, so it could embrace, extend and extinguish) 13. What is the name of the DE? (explore.exe, there are other DE's and shells. Aero, the 3D explore.exe since Vista also supports plugins for desktop effects, like Compiz, since Vista).
An Operating System IS a fscking HARDWARE ABSTRACTION tool for programmers. The fscking fact that it BECOMES THE HARDWARE INTERFACE ITSELF is MORE RELEVANT NOW THAN HAS EVER BEEN IN HUMAN FSCKING HISTORY.
Ever since that FSCKED UP DRM has show up, the ACTUAL REVERSE has started happening.
Welcome to programming class. You finnished lessong 1: "Programming 101". Have you done your Hello World! homework? Good boy./reaction to morons who found their way to/. If you mod this down, may God strike you dead at once.
We already have a silicon valley... Why don't they create something new?
Oh wait... That is because they don't need a silicon valley for anything; they just need a thriving economy.
Well guess what, morons? The economy is about to implode, not only because of a huge fraud, but also because lending equals income. Yes. No realy... Do the math, correctly this time...
Now if the UK is in deep shit, first look at what is wrong with the UK. Here are the results: 1. Shitty people, who elect; 2. Shitty politicians, who pass; 3. Shitty laws, especially; 4. Shitty technology infrastructure, due to; 5. Shitty DRM and TCP, copied straight out of; 6. 1984.
Dear UK,
Since you will never get out of this shithole, because you are not reading this post and not taking it seriously, you will never get up and create what the world wants to buy, which is: 1. Open hardware; 2. FLOS software; 3. Privacy infrastructure; 4. Quality goods, at an; 5. Affordable price.
Pure logic is form, expressing their rules in symbols. Math is written in these symbols, but implements its own. Math is explaining the patterns we find in the way everything behaves. How it behaves is written, therefore, in math, and we call it physics.
Then again, I was not making a point, yet I was explaining how it could be that the expected 50%, wasn't 50%. but then again 50% was expected from a mathematical algorithm. Since math, like I proved, has an infinite amount of variables, the 50% of the time, time which is possibilities thus variables, criteria was not met, because it wasn't tested long enough for the result to become 50%. So what happens in between, is that in a multiverse; 48% of the time it was correct in this universe, and thus 52% of the time it was correct in the other universe. That is true, because it still upholds the quantum principles, because the balance is proven by the averages in the percentage, hence my calculation.
OK, I'm sorry; (48+52)/2 equals 50 (%). I even forgot what I was calculating... Damnit. I realy need to stop taking these cianide pills.
How stupid of me to see the Universe as a corral, with all possible branches (time is change, right?), counting in relativity (in time), multiverse Quantum Physic behavior (48% versus 52%, damn how retarded) and the fact that we are observing multiverse behavior in just 'side' of the universe, while testing a mathmetical theory without checking all infinite numbers. Holy shit, I so stupid.
Slashdot Mirror
The explenation is very simple: we're moving away from an ice age. Yes; look at the north- and the south pole.
An ice age start when there's snow falling and water is freezing, and stays there (in whole or in part) untill the next winter.
The real question is not if there is global warming (there is, simply look at the available data; no need for extrapolating here), but how that global warming is going to affect the human species, in terms of habitablility, or not.
There are two outcomes:
1. It is habitable, or;
2. It is not habitable.
Then the next question, if not habitable:
1. Can we, and should we, adjust the climate? (dangerous), or;
2. Should we change our way of living, like engineering smal biospheres.
I thought everybody converted to Whatsapp, ages ago.
But this does truly starts to axe into Microsoft's dominance. I remember the times where using MSN for chatting on Linux, was such a pain in the ass, everytime they changed the fscking protocol.
Even the MSOffice XML doctypes are losing ground.
I hope this doesn't mean that after the IBM and later Microsoft dominance, Apple will be the next big headache in computing, but that might turn out to be HTMLv5 (hopefully!).
So does Apple, before creating a distribution of Darwin and shipping it, compiled and configured, through the internet.
If this is about a critical, large budget kind of thing, then this is so secure that I dare to claim that it is perfect, even though it theoretically is not.
1. Get some general hardware, supported by Coreboot;
2. Examine the code of Coreboot, then compile with a compiler release that is way older than the hardware;
3. Examine a microkernel codebase, newer than the hardware, then only compile what you need, simply because unneeded codepaths that are connected to other code can lead to a theoretical exploits;
4. Encrypt network communications, then bitflip for corruption, and include random noice (Rubberhose File System style);
5. Run a whitelist network packet checker, like Mandatory Acces Controll profiling, for communication.
6. Write application for functionality of computing device, compile for other CPU architecture, and emulate on CPU emulator lib.
Should be good enough, no?
How about MAC (Mandatory Acces Control)?
Hello SELinux... (Fedora)
Does chess have a worthwile purpose? Is this made for your benifit?
This is news for nerds, remember. The question should be "Why not?".
Respect should be earned, not with the knowledge obtained, but what has been done with it.
I learn to do. Learning for respect is goddamn stupid.
Looks like MOOC is based on Connectivism, in which knowledge is connected. Isn't that what Wikipedia is?
BTW: Who gives a shit about respect?
You're missing the point. It's Linus and he's at it again! Another classic going straight to the archive...
Lol nice try.
Microsoft won because free, cheap, compatible with everything offce. Office leads to home use.
End of stupid story.
Pay VERY CLOSE ATTENTION you what you're about to read, in this post. Agree or disagree, but please do read: ...
An evolutionary gene mutation that proves fit, happens once in (if I remember correctly;) 3000 years. (but I might be wrong).
Now, why has society advanced so much over the last 3000 years? Because of the ability to read and write. But that's not all there is to it!
Religion and later governance, has made sure that only the most fit for each particular system, survive. But how exactly does this advance humanity, DNA-wise? The development of human society goes at a much faster rate than that of human evolution... I'll tell you; because there has been only of type of mutation and the rest get annihilated through war, by gene REMOVAL. (by now you're probably frowning upon this seemingly rediculous statemen, but bare with me)
Here are the facts:
-We see an exponential increase in psychiatric 'disorders';
-If you put someone with autism under an FMRI, you'll see something interesting; the brains look very similar, but very different to 'normal people';
-War is waged often, and many soldiers die by it;
-Autism and ADHD 'patients' can't stay in bootcamp for very long, because they are lacking social understanding, disaplin and/of planning skills (time is a slave driven invention, used my Napoleon, for a reason);
-Whenever a war is over, there is alway a birth-wave noticaeble;
-We are steadily moving towards Technocracy (DRM, TCP, Intelectual property, patents, centralised information systems like FaceBook, meta-internet development and globalization);
-..... Well by now you can draw the fscking conclusion yourself.
So; GET TREATED AT YOUR OWN RISC! You are the future! Look at what interest you at Slashdot! Can you be succesful, making a living with technology? KEEP DOING THAT! Aren't you socialy inteligent enough to communicate enough on /., in the way that everybody doesn't judge you, because of some stupid 'social' expectancies? Aren't you socializing, right here?! Right now?
FUCK DSM-V!
At some point, the CPU needs to be touched. It's a little technical, but the CPU can only do one thing at a time, and the code can put the CPU in specific states. So when the Vista kernel says: put this into ram and load that page... At which point does the Linux app get to say: "w-wait a second! It's my turn to load some of me there! Hey I want to load that from the harddrive there!"? ;-)
Vista doesn't suspend to disk untill you tell it to, and then you need to startup the computer manualy and load up the Linux app ;-)
Imagine you have two apps that require two kernels, say; busdrivers, and there is only one bus (computer), with only one steeringwheel and one drivers seat... Well...
You mean that standard, certified and non-enthousiast crap that everyone with a MS certificate is able to cough up?
Good question. It all boils down to the fact that the operating systems have scheduling differences and can't run together, unless virtualised. Unless you intend to ship a program with all of its dependancies, but I'm not so sure that a simple app plus 123terrabyte of Vista is practical and legal to distribute ;-) Let alone run...
I could explain why I wrote that, but the fact remains that you are right ;-)
Cool. Have you met my friend John Cloud, the super scaleable, next generation Operating System, virtualizing your stupid API? :)
1. Kernel name of Windows 7 (NT6.1);
2. Why is file transfer since Vista so slow (introduction of user space driver)
3. Why is Windows 7 faster than Vista (it is not; gui has higher sceduling priority)
4. How much more ram does Vista consume, compared with XP? (wrong; it's less, but why?; Vista caches like preload).
5. Is NT POSIX compliant? Since when and how?
6. What is the main difference between the TCP/IP stack in XP and Vista, other than IPv6?
7. What compiler does Microsoft use, to compile Windows? (not the one they make, hint)
8. Ask something about Powershell
9. Difference between win32 and winRT;
10. Is NT a Microkernel or monolithic (microkernel with servers in kernelspace)
11. Is NT x86 only? (also ppc and titanium and arm)
12. Was Win32 the only planned API to support and why (NT was designed to support a lot more API's, so it could embrace, extend and extinguish)
13. What is the name of the DE? (explore.exe, there are other DE's and shells. Aero, the 3D explore.exe since Vista also supports plugins for desktop effects, like Compiz, since Vista).
Goog-... DuckDuckGo your ass off, I'd say ;-)
No it is not, you fscking moron. Ulgh...
An Operating System IS a fscking HARDWARE ABSTRACTION tool for programmers. The fscking fact that it BECOMES THE HARDWARE INTERFACE ITSELF is MORE RELEVANT NOW THAN HAS EVER BEEN IN HUMAN FSCKING HISTORY.
Ever since that FSCKED UP DRM has show up, the ACTUAL REVERSE has started happening.
Welcome to programming class. You finnished lessong 1: "Programming 101". Have you done your Hello World! homework? Good boy. /reaction to morons who found their way to /.
If you mod this down, may God strike you dead at once.
We already have a silicon valley... Why don't they create something new?
Oh wait... That is because they don't need a silicon valley for anything; they just need a thriving economy.
Well guess what, morons? The economy is about to implode, not only because of a huge fraud, but also because lending equals income. Yes. No realy... Do the math, correctly this time...
Now if the UK is in deep shit, first look at what is wrong with the UK. Here are the results:
1. Shitty people, who elect;
2. Shitty politicians, who pass;
3. Shitty laws, especially;
4. Shitty technology infrastructure, due to;
5. Shitty DRM and TCP, copied straight out of;
6. 1984.
Dear UK,
Since you will never get out of this shithole, because you are not reading this post and not taking it seriously, you will never get up and create what the world wants to buy, which is:
1. Open hardware;
2. FLOS software;
3. Privacy infrastructure;
4. Quality goods, at an;
5. Affordable price.
God save the UK.
Now this, I like :)
My iPad doesn't agree with iOS to be buttery fast. In fact; it's slow as fsck. First gen iPad and last gen iOS. Loading a pdf is a pain in the ass.
Pure logic is form, expressing their rules in symbols. Math is written in these symbols, but implements its own. Math is explaining the patterns we find in the way everything behaves. How it behaves is written, therefore, in math, and we call it physics.
Then again, I was not making a point, yet I was explaining how it could be that the expected 50%, wasn't 50%. but then again 50% was expected from a mathematical algorithm. Since math, like I proved, has an infinite amount of variables, the 50% of the time, time which is possibilities thus variables, criteria was not met, because it wasn't tested long enough for the result to become 50%. So what happens in between, is that in a multiverse; 48% of the time it was correct in this universe, and thus 52% of the time it was correct in the other universe. That is true, because it still upholds the quantum principles, because the balance is proven by the averages in the percentage, hence my calculation.
If I want to be on the convincing bandwagon, I'd get into politics.
Instead I'd like to see you prove me wrong.
Proof in front of every reader here why I'm wrong, and even I will be convinced that I am stupid.
Some would call this "put up or shut up". There; I made a punchline. Like me now?
Want a job at Google? Work on Chrome. Are you god-awfull talented too? You might.
At Google it's not a failure to get rejected; it's a massive honor if you are hired.
OK, I'm sorry; (48+52)/2 equals 50 (%). I even forgot what I was calculating... Damnit. I realy need to stop taking these cianide pills.
How stupid of me to see the Universe as a corral, with all possible branches (time is change, right?), counting in relativity (in time), multiverse Quantum Physic behavior (48% versus 52%, damn how retarded) and the fact that we are observing multiverse behavior in just 'side' of the universe, while testing a mathmetical theory without checking all infinite numbers. Holy shit, I so stupid.
Thanks man, I'm off to rehad straight away 3