Slashdot Mirror


Torvalds Uses Profanity To Lambaste Romney Remarks

netbuzz writes "Last night Linux creator Linus Torvalds took to his Google+ page and called Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney 'a f***ing moron.' Torvalds' stated reason? Romney's much-ridiculed suggestion that air passengers would be safer in emergencies if aircraft windows could be opened (a suggestion which some, including Snopes.com, have taken as a joke). Torvalds also recently called Mormonism, Romney's religion, 'bats**t crazy.' Is this just Linus being Linus? Or does such outspokenness on non-technical matters reflect poorly on the Linux community that Torvalds leads?"

1,223 comments

  1. Reflects poorly by linear+a · · Score: 5, Insightful

    eom

    1. Re:Reflects poorly by forestgomp · · Score: 0

      true dat

    2. Re:Reflects poorly by farble1670 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      so ... you're incapable of seeing two sides of the same person? if you disagree with them in one arena, you can't respect them in another? that seems a little simplistic.

    3. Re:Reflects poorly by Tehrasha · · Score: 1
      But he recanted... so all is well...

      It shouldn't matter a wit, what Linus' political opinion is, any more than the brand of car he drives. But for some, it will.

      Its not like the community condones murder just because some people like/use ReiserFS... But some refuse to use the fs for that reason alone.

      In the end, his comments, or anyone else's for that matter, reflect upon the community only as much as the reader thinks they do. You cant change that.

    4. Re:Reflects poorly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "if you disagree with them in one arena, you can't respect them in another? that seems a little simplistic."

      Not really, at this point in history everyone voting for romney is ignorant, rich, insane or all of the above.

    5. Re:Reflects poorly by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Reflects positively. Being able to recognize BS when you see it is positive. Having the stones to say so when you see it is also positive.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    6. Re:Reflects poorly by HiThere · · Score: 1

      It reflects poorly, BECAUSE most people don't like to hear strong opinions clearly expressed.

      I will also grant that it wasn't a good technical analysis of why the idea was batshit crazy. And it didn't define the term carefully. But I suspect that most people knew what he meant, and wouldn't have read a long and detailed analysis of all the reasons that it was batshit crazy.

      If you're going to be politically correct, you need to waffle and obscure your position. Otherwise it will reflect poorly on you.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    7. Re:Reflects poorly by tqk · · Score: 1

      bitch ass nigga

      The envy is strong in you. :-P

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  2. reflects well by Coop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since Linus is speaking honestly, he makes the entire community look good.

    --
    "If you're not passionate about your operating system, you're married to the wrong one."
    1. Re:reflects well by turkeydance · · Score: 5, Insightful

      success in one field (for Linus and Mitt) doesn't translate into viability with another.

    2. Re:reflects well by frosty_tsm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Since Linus is speaking honestly, he makes the entire community look good.

      or that Obama has time for Letterman, The View, Beyonce and JayZ

      It's campaign season. Get over it. Every sitting president has campaigned whether it's town hall meetings, stump speeches or TV shows.

    3. Re:reflects well by ArcherB · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wow. He spent some time playing golf. Big fucking deal.

      Call me when he spends 3 years on vacation like bush.

      http://politic365.com/2012/05/08/obamas-vacations-of-any-president-bush-racked-up-the-most/

      Bush vacationed at his Ranch near Crawford Texas. He had an office at his ranch and worked from it. He hosted world leaders, had cabinet meetings, the whole nine yards. It actually saved the taxpayers money because his house is truly "green" and is much easier to secure than the White House.

      Strange that I didn't see Obama meeting with any world leaders on any of his trips to Hawaii. I don't recall Merkel tagging along when they went to a Broadway show. I didn't see Netanyahu with Obama on The View or David Letterman.

      And when Bush was on vacation, the unemployment rates was not over 6%. People can't find jobs while Michelle is whooping it up in Aspen on the backs of the taxpayer.

      These guys put it another way:

      According to presidential watcher Mark Knoller of CBS, George W. Bush, at this time of his presidency, had made 30 visits to his Texas ranch spanning all or part of 220 days. The Obama’s vacation day count is less than half of that.

      But his have become more controversial because of the costs associated with moving the first family to a public vacation spot, unlike the Bushes to their remote ranch in Crawford, Texas. For example, the Hawaii Reporter said the first family’s 2011 Christmas vacation in Hawaii would exceed $1.5 million.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    4. Re:reflects well by jbolden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some of this is BS like the amount of time Obama has spent with this national security team.
      What's Romney's policy on Libya? What is Romney's policy on terrorism? Other than "not apologizing" he seems to mostly agree with Obama. So his policy is what, do what Obama wants just be more of a jackass while doing it?
      Romney has repeatedly refused to answer any questions on the budget. Obama's budget's conversely have been rather good blocking Republican spending cuts and continuing the 2009 budget more or less indefinitely.
      As for more people being on food stamps or jobs. Obama (or more accurately Pelosi) would love to pass something like the WPA and get them off food stamps and into government jobs. Dire poverty has far more to do with Republicans failing to provide needed stimulus.

    5. Re:reflects well by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      or that Obama has time for Letterman, The View, Beyonce and JayZ

      You realize that he's campaigning, right? These public appearances are part of his campaign. It might be nice if a sitting president didn't have to spend much of his 4th year in a reelection campaign, but I'm not sure how to do that. Maybe longer terms with a single-term limit?

      he and his wife flew out to NY on the taxpayer dime for dinner and a Broadway show

      People make this complaint about every president - the president really has no choice in the matter, he can't book a ticket on a commercial flight and slip away to NYC for a private weekend with his wife. All of his trips, regardless of reason come with immense security that most individuals cannot afford to pay, so every trip is on the taxpayer's dime. This is the tradeoff we make between protecting our top leaders and saving money. Is there any candidate that will promise to never go on vacation? Would you want such a candidate in office?

      the fact that he's spending more time of the golf course than with his financial advisors and his national security team combined

      In nearly 3-1/2 years (1200 days), he's played 100 rounds of golf. Once every 12 days. At 6 hours each, that's 600 hours. or 30 minutes/day. Sounds like a reasonable recreational activity. Many people think that recreation outside of work helps them stay more focused on their job, and I'd imagine that's true even for presidents. And much of his golf is played on military courses, which reduces the security expenses paid by taxpayers.

      fact that a budget has not been passed since Obama has been in office

      Congress has done a lot of things poorly since Obama has been in office, but that doesn't mean Obama is solely to blame.

      or the fact that more people are on food stamps, are in poverty and/or can't find a job....

      Maybe it takes more than 4 years to completely turn around a huge economic downturn that the entire world is still suffering from.

    6. Re:reflects well by SolitaryMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      You should work as a PR spokesperson for some politician or something :)

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    7. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Since Linus is speaking honestly, he makes the entire community look good.

      or that Obama has time for Letterman, The View, Beyonce and JayZ

      It's campaign season. Get over it. Every sitting president has campaigned whether it's town hall meetings, stump speeches or TV shows.

      If that's the case, then he's been "campaigning" for the last 3 years. He never stopped "campaigning".

    8. Re:reflects well by hawguy · · Score: 0

      These [washingtonexaminer.com] guys put it another way:

      According to presidential watcher Mark Knoller of CBS, George W. Bush, at this time of his presidency, had made 30 visits to his Texas ranch spanning all or part of 220 days. The Obama’s vacation day count is less than half of that.

      But his have become more controversial because of the costs associated with moving the first family to a public vacation spot, unlike the Bushes to their remote ranch in Crawford, Texas. For example, the Hawaii Reporter said the first family’s 2011 Christmas vacation in Hawaii would exceed $1.5 million.

      So we should never vote for presidents that don't own a large private ranch, or that come from states that are popular vacation spots?

    9. Re:reflects well by Seeteufel · · Score: 2

      What is Romney's policy on FOSS migration?

    10. Re:reflects well by ArcherB · · Score: 0

      These [washingtonexaminer.com] guys put it another way:

      According to presidential watcher Mark Knoller of CBS, George W. Bush, at this time of his presidency, had made 30 visits to his Texas ranch spanning all or part of 220 days. The Obama’s vacation day count is less than half of that.

      But his have become more controversial because of the costs associated with moving the first family to a public vacation spot, unlike the Bushes to their remote ranch in Crawford, Texas. For example, the Hawaii Reporter said the first family's 2011 Christmas vacation in Hawaii would exceed $1.5 million.

      So we should never vote for presidents that don't own a large private ranch, or that come from states that are popular vacation spots?

      LOL! If you had ever been to Crawford, I don't think you'd be saying that. Think Kansas with scrub brush and less people. The Bush ranch is certainly no vacation home.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    11. Re:reflects well by jellomizer · · Score: 0

      Except for the impression that we are a bunch of geeks who's honest opinions will often insult people and general asocial.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    12. Re:reflects well by jbolden · · Score: 0

      i doubt he has one. But he would likely be opposed he hates things in the public interest.

    13. Re:reflects well by sd4f · · Score: 1

      People make this complaint about every president - the president really has no choice in the matter, he can't book a ticket on a commercial flight and slip away to NYC for a private weekend with his wife. All of his trips, regardless of reason come with immense security that most individuals cannot afford to pay, so every trip is on the taxpayer's dime. This is the tradeoff we make between protecting our top leaders and saving money. Is there any candidate that will promise to never go on vacation? Would you want such a candidate in office?

      But if something did happen, can't you just elect a new president?

    14. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...he was suggesting that Obama's pricetag is unfairly weighted by his home of origin.

    15. Re:reflects well by Seeteufel · · Score: 2

      FOSS-migration is in my personal interest. Tax payer money should be spent wisely.

    16. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He thinks those illegal FOSS immigrants should all be shot, leaving more jobs available for honest hard-working red-blooded Republican rednecks!

    17. Re:reflects well by hawguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      People make this complaint about every president - the president really has no choice in the matter, he can't book a ticket on a commercial flight and slip away to NYC for a private weekend with his wife. All of his trips, regardless of reason come with immense security that most individuals cannot afford to pay, so every trip is on the taxpayer's dime. This is the tradeoff we make between protecting our top leaders and saving money. Is there any candidate that will promise to never go on vacation? Would you want such a candidate in office?

      But if something did happen, can't you just elect a new president?

      Sure, and there is a succession plan 18 people deep to decide who would take over in the interim and it would take up to a year for the special election to take place. In the meantime the VP is next in line to become president, and there are few vice presidents (or speaker of the house, or secretary of education, or any other people in the succession plan) from either party that I'd want to be acting as president. Especially in a crisis like the death of a sitting president.

      The costs from the financial turmoil from even an unsuccessful assassination attempt would be far greater than the cost of providing years of first class security to the president.

    18. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Somehow you forgot to mention the most important thing he did on vacation. While busy vacationing, on August 6, 2001, he ignored a little report titled 'Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US'.

    19. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually I can find no fault with Torvalds observations. I seriously cringe at the prospects of Romney becomong President of the US. It wouldn't be so bad if the US was some backwater nation but since it isn't then the calibre of the elected president needs to be someone with a serious grasp on reality. Something Romney seems to need badly.

    20. Re:reflects well by gangien · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It does not follow that if you are speaking honestly, that makes your community look good.

      Example: If Linus feels that all women should be raped, that would not make anybody look good.

      All that said. I personally don't give a fuck.

    21. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why he's winning.

    22. Re:reflects well by readin · · Score: 1

      These [washingtonexaminer.com] guys put it another way:

      According to presidential watcher Mark Knoller of CBS, George W. Bush, at this time of his presidency, had made 30 visits to his Texas ranch spanning all or part of 220 days. The Obama’s vacation day count is less than half of that.

      But his have become more controversial because of the costs associated with moving the first family to a public vacation spot, unlike the Bushes to their remote ranch in Crawford, Texas. For example, the Hawaii Reporter said the first family’s 2011 Christmas vacation in Hawaii would exceed $1.5 million.

      Camp David is nice.

      So we should never vote for presidents that don't own a large private ranch, or that come from states that are popular vacation spots?

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    23. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for more people being on food stamps or jobs. Obama (or more accurately Pelosi) would love to pass something like the WPA and get them off food stamps and into government jobs.

      Well, they're still on the government payroll. Shift them from the right teat to the left one? Aren't we rife with the government wasting money already?

      We need private sector jobs for them and there Obama = /dev/null.

    24. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Rmoney would _make_ the US a backwater nation, so you see it all works out.

    25. Re:reflects well by readin · · Score: 1

      These [washingtonexaminer.com] guys put it another way:

      According to presidential watcher Mark Knoller of CBS, George W. Bush, at this time of his presidency, had made 30 visits to his Texas ranch spanning all or part of 220 days. The Obama’s vacation day count is less than half of that.

      But his have become more controversial because of the costs associated with moving the first family to a public vacation spot, unlike the Bushes to their remote ranch in Crawford, Texas. For example, the Hawaii Reporter said the first family’s 2011 Christmas vacation in Hawaii would exceed $1.5 million.

      So we should never vote for presidents that don't own a large private ranch, or that come from states that are popular vacation spots?

      Camp David is nice.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    26. Re:reflects well by Slyfox696 · · Score: 1

      As soon as I know Obama's position, I'll get back to you on this.

    27. Re:reflects well by hawguy · · Score: 1

      These [washingtonexaminer.com] guys put it another way:

      According to presidential watcher Mark Knoller of CBS, George W. Bush, at this time of his presidency, had made 30 visits to his Texas ranch spanning all or part of 220 days. The Obama’s vacation day count is less than half of that.

      But his have become more controversial because of the costs associated with moving the first family to a public vacation spot, unlike the Bushes to their remote ranch in Crawford, Texas. For example, the Hawaii Reporter said the first family’s 2011 Christmas vacation in Hawaii would exceed $1.5 million.

      So we should never vote for presidents that don't own a large private ranch, or that come from states that are popular vacation spots?

      Camp David is nice.

      Lots of places are nice, but they are not "home". I still go home for Christmas and other times of year because it's "home" -- I still have many family and friends there, and nice to be in familiar surroundings from time to time. While going to Hawaii is may be closer and cheaper for me than flying to a small east coast town for Christmas, I still choose the more expensive trip because it's "home".

      Should a president give up his right to visit his home because it's "too expensive" for taxpayers? Why not just set up predetermined vacations for each president - grant each president one week at Camp David and one week at Monticello each year. Many jobs in this country offer only 2 weeks of vacation, so that should be more than enough for a president right? After all, he is our employee.

    28. Re:reflects well by pseudofrog · · Score: 2

      Strange that I didn't see Obama meeting with any world leaders on any of his trips to Hawaii.

      Obama's vacations are more like vacations. Bush made it his second office. Considering the fact that Bush spent, last I checked, three times as many days on vacation as Obama, he didn't really have much of a choice but to actually do some work while he was out there. Personally, I'd rather have the president work in the capital instead of flying everyone out to his remote ranch.

      And when Bush was on vacation, the unemployment rates was not over 6%.

      Yeah. He was only dealing with two wars.

    29. Re:reflects well by furytrader · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "success in one field (for Linus and Mitt) doesn't translate into viability with another." See: Krugman, Paul.

    30. Re:reflects well by hawguy · · Score: 1, Informative

      Wow. He spent some time playing golf. Big fucking deal.

      Call me when he spends 3 years on vacation like bush.

      http://politic365.com/2012/05/08/obamas-vacations-of-any-president-bush-racked-up-the-most/

      Here is a picture of the Ranch. Notice the caption:

      George W. Bush (center) is joined by Condoleezza Rice (left) and Paul Wolfowitz, (right) as they talk with reporters before the start of an intelligence briefing from the CIA at Bush's ranch

      Obama has pictures of his "working vacations" too!

      http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2010/01/obamas_working_hawaii_vacation.html

      President Obama and top national security advisor Denis McDonough working in Hawaii, where the Obama family was vacationing over the holiday break. The family returned to Washington on Monday.

      Obama doesn't attend CIA briefings when he's in Washington!

      That's a little misleading, according to this source:

      http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/09/24/898081/kessler-thiessen-intel-breifing-bogus-misleading/?mobile=nc

      Clearly, different presidents have structured their daily briefing from the CIA to fit their unique personal styles. Many did not have an oral briefing, while three — two of whom are named Bush — preferred to deal directly with a CIA official. Obama appears to have opted for a melding of the two approaches, in which he receives oral briefings, but not as frequently as his predecessor.

    31. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody who thinks, well it's not really thinking, believes is a better word, that what Linus thinks or believes holds any reflection on any views and or positions held by "others" are as stupid and brain dead as they beleive the "others" to be. But that's the point isn't it. Those incapable of thinking freely and incapable of combining two independant thoughts together based on evidence they gather themselves, who's lives are totally influenced by the "views" and "opinions" of "others" belive others to be the same. And should therefore be dealt with in some way. Either by objecting or worse,... Law Making.

      Morons!

    32. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since Linus is speaking honestly, he makes the entire community look good.

      Exactly wrong. He makes you look, well, like fucking morons.

      It's one thing to say something scathing that adds to the debate, it's another to so harshly criticize a minor moment. And it's YET ANOTHER to be wrong in your harsh criticism of a minor moment.

      I think Romney is a dangerous fool. But I can tell he was joking. If you can't, you're a cretinous troll.

    33. Re:reflects well by Plekto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Romney does come from one of the most liberal states in the country. So much so that he's not likely to even win his own state in the election. He's closer to, say, a Texas Democrat or Oregon Republican (read: fairly moderate) than the asshat fundamentalist that he's been trying to portray himself as in order to get the nomination. So of course nothing much makes sense. He's not being himself in any of this and refuses to say anything lest he be branded as a liberal by most of the extreme right in his party. After all, his positions ARE pretty similar to Obama's.

      The problem is that he was a moderately conservative (his being a complete jerk aside) governor in an extremely liberal state who was pushed into the feeding frenzy that is Washington politics. So of course he got blind-sided. What he considered normal conservative practices and ideology wasn't even on the same planet as what the embittered fanatics in the RNC were espousing on a national level. Note how even Ron Paul also got pushed so hard to the right that he wasn't even able to say much of anything about his core Libertarian beliefs in the primaries.

      As for Torvalds, he's as much of a spokesperson for Linux and its various distros and forks as Bill Gates is for Microsoft at this point. He has some connection to the product that he created, but essentially doesn't actually do anything meaningful at this point.

    34. Re:reflects well by Plekto · · Score: 2

      The President sends Congress a wish-list of what he wants them to do, but it's largely ignored by Congress. (this has been the pattern for several years now, actually). So, yes, Obama's. "budget" was not passed as he initially submitted it to them.. They basically told him where to stick it and did their own thing instead. Eventually the President had to cave in to Congress' demands. But a budget was actually passed. Just not really the one Obama wanted.

      Congress passes a budget every year. Sometimes late, but they do actually get one passed.

      You can check it if you want:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_United_States_federal_budget
      You can click on the 2011 above the little picture to go to 2011 and 2012's pages. See the "passed" and the date on every page?

    35. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Krugman, Paul

      For Krugman, the area in question is satire, a problem exhibited by many of the moon-bats around here.

    36. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just ask Reiser.

    37. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and let me guess, #43 took the Greyhound back and forth to Crawford, that's why it took him several months each time.

      and, if I may recite one of my all-time favorite apparently-stupid-but-secretly-brilliant quotes of all time (from a truly despicable politician nonetheless) -- "there are known knowns; there are things we know that we know. there are known unknowns; that is to say there are things that, we now know we don't know.
      But there are also unknown unknowns – there are things we do not know we don't know."

    38. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, with all this time "not working", they stopped one of the worst economic free-falls in history, got bin laden, got us out of Iraq, passed (some) healthcare sanity measures, and yup, went on The View... just like the guy he's running against.

      But, you know... Derp Derp Lazy Black People Derp Derp Zomg Gas Prices Derp Derp Communism Derp Derp Moar Fox News Derp Derp!

    39. Re:reflects well by GigaBurglar · · Score: 1

      No but the possession of a brain might just do the trick.

    40. Re:reflects well by GigaBurglar · · Score: 2

      I think he was implying that Romney actually is a moron.

    41. Re:reflects well by tibit · · Score: 2

      I keep hearing that president's life is protected to protect us all from such a turmoil. How well do we think we know the imaginary turmoil would actually happen? Who gives a hoot if the president is alive? His status (alive or dead) has no practical relevance to the markets of any sort, or really to much anything outside of his family and the process needed to get a replacement elected. That is, unless the traders themselves loose their brains, like they often do. Self fulfilling prophecy it would be, at best, I'd think. There'd be turmoil only because everyone expects there to be turmoil, and people would turn irrational and do stupid shit.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    42. Re:reflects well by jbolden · · Score: 2

      Obama appointed Julius Genachowski to head a lot of these. He has been pro open standards and pro open access but indifferent to FOSS vs. commercial. You can look his positions up.

    43. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does Obama's position have to do with Romney's posit....

      I GET IT!

    44. Re:reflects well by jbolden · · Score: 2

      Continuing resolutions and debt extensions which have prevented the Republicans from doing much in the way of budget cuts.

      I'm hard pressed to see how this isn't him getting stuff done.

    45. Re:reflects well by mrbcs · · Score: 5, Funny
      Well, the mormon angels name was Moroni.

      Mormons are here to make scientology look credible. You want to see bat-shit crazy, just research some Mormon stuff. From baptizing dead jews to getting their own planets, they have some crazy stuff going on in there.

      Mormonism vs Christianity http://mormoninfo.org/

      The best gag was from a comic when Bush was still in office. The comic was asked what he thought about a Mormon president. After a pause, he shrugged meh, what's one letter?

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    46. Re:reflects well by dark12222000 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, but I also agree with Linus.. Argh, what to do!?

    47. Re:reflects well by celtic_hackr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You have to be bats**t crazy to think that the opinions of one person, be he the leader of the Free World, the Wanna-Be-Leader of the Free World, or the leader of the truly Free and Open Linux Kernel reflects on every person in the respective community. And who's F**king Moronic idea was it, that this is even /. newsworthy?

    48. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry. What Obama budget are you speaking of? Hell, even the democrats won't submit his budget. So.. here we are 3 years later and no budget. Yes, you are right that is change. Excuse me I have to go get my free food stamps now....

    49. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Proof? Everything you are saying is lies, Obama has spent more time working than any president in recent memory. Estimates put him as having spent nearly twice the days working than bush did in his first 4 years. All the problems with people being on food stamps and unemployment were caused by 8 years of systematic destruction by the bush administration and republican legislature. Had McCain right now the poverty will levels be like nothing since the 30's. I am talking bread lines, food riots and shanty towns in central park. If Mitt wins he will continue the same systematic destruction that his party has been dreaming of for 4 years. We are at the end of our rope, any more gutting by puppets for the rich will end in the collapse of our society.

    50. Re:reflects well by Grave · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Clearly you don't understand the financial markets. The overwhelming majority of things that impact stock values and market prices are not present/actual happenings, but concerns over potential happenings. US President dies? VP might start a war over it, or change economic policies. Leader of middle eastern country gets the flu? Oil supplies might get disrupted by his successor.

      A lot of basic policies didn't change between Obama and Bush (sadly), but the president represents the public face and voice of the country moreso than anyone else can. Obama is way more eloquent, patient, and understanding than Bush was, so the overall view of the US has improved from then--it's no longer quite so dangerous for a US citizen to travel to Europe or Asia and admit to being an American. Would Biden do as well as Obama has with this? Probably not. So it does affect more than just the people in his immediate family.

    51. Re:reflects well by Rootkit · · Score: 1

      self-compilation.

    52. Re:reflects well by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 0

      I don't buy it. He said "I don't know why they don't do that", and if that was all he said it could very well be taken as a joke. But instead, he followed it up with "It's a real problem", which indicates he was NOT in fact joking.

    53. Re:reflects well by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I don't give a fuck, either.

      The problem is that everyone has the right to an opinion and the right to voice it. Unfortunately, when you have some notoriety, doing so can cost you. If I were anyone of importance, I would tend to practice the whole thing about keeping your mouth shit about religion and politics, in polite company. Opening your mouth about it can only cost you and won't particularly influence or impact anything positively.

      As to his particular comments . . . I don't see any issue with them. The airplane comment from Romney is (if serious) just fucking dumb. And the comment about religion is entirely fair. Most people say "that other religion is fucking NUTS . . . not my religion -- my religion is totally sane... we just eat our savior's bones and drink his blood and celebrate his resurrection is all... but that OTHER religion.. oh boy, what a bunch of crazies!". And if that were what Linus said, I would take issue with his comment. But since he is not a theist, his comment is consistent and would surely be espoused with regard to *any* religion. Though, perhaps, more strongly toward religions that actively proselytize and also heavily influence government and politics.

    54. Re:reflects well by Esteanil · · Score: 1

      I keep hearing that president's life is protected to protect us all from such a turmoil. How well do we think we know the imaginary turmoil would actually happen? Who gives a hoot if the president is alive? His status (alive or dead) has no practical relevance to the markets of any sort, or really to much anything outside of his family and the process needed to get a replacement elected. That is, unless the traders themselves loose their brains, like they often do. Self fulfilling prophecy it would be, at best, I'd think. There'd be turmoil only because everyone expects there to be turmoil, and people would turn irrational and do stupid shit.

      And this turmoil which you yourself admit would appear and which would likely ravage the markets is less real than "real" turmoil how, exactly? You can't ignore basic psychology.

      --
      I'm a dreamer, the world is my playpen. But hey, I'm a serious person, I can't dream all the time.
    55. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Barack Obama was a member of the Illinois State Senate from January 8, 1997 to November 4, 2004 (according to wikipedia).

    56. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same Obama Bin Laden who did attack US during republican rule ? You want another attack ? Good luck electing a**holes that rest of the world loves.

    57. Re:reflects well by porges · · Score: 1

      There's no "special election" in the event of a Presidential death; the VP becomes President until the next normal election.

    58. Re:reflects well by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Romney's policy on anything: Start by not already being a complete failure for the past 3.7 years.

    59. Re:reflects well by Raenex · · Score: 1

      What's Romney's policy on Libya? What is Romney's policy on terrorism? Other than "not apologizing" he seems to mostly agree with Obama.

      Romney's foreign policy: Whatever Obama is doing is wrong, even if alternate-Romney suggested the same thing 6 months ago.

    60. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linus is right. Wait. I agree with his opinion. Don't tell Mitt to give up though - he's creating jobs.

    61. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a crock....I used to come here to catch up on everything technical and now I have to deal with political BS...

    62. Re:reflects well by obarthelemy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      We should amend that to "Linux was speaking honestly *and rightly*". The windows idea is dumb, and mormonism is a sect-type cult.

      I only disagree in that mormonism is not batshit crazy: it fulfilled its intended purpose. The guy wanted to lay lots of women, and found that selling himself as a prophet *and* having god tell him to be promiscuous, worked. Better than the catholic prophet, IIRC.

      On the one hand, having a open software standard bearer talk politics doesn't help The Cause. On the other hand, this hypocritical mor(m)on has it coming.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    63. Re:reflects well by Comen · · Score: 1

      "Maybe it takes more than 4 years to completely turn around a huge economic downturn that the entire world is still suffering from"

      I would argue it sure does, and the idea that giving these companies tax breaks will make them hire more seems crazy, most of Wall Street is doing very well right now, many companies are sitting on lots of money. The problem is that companies do not hire because they have money and want to be nice, they hire to fill a need.
      The real issue is that people are out of work and times are tight, people are not buying, and at times like this, companies cut employees not hire them. A stimulus is one way to get the ball rolling again, just long enough that people have money to spend and companies have to hire to keep up again.
      But the real issue is that during the Bush years middle class incomes stagnated, and instead of helping the middle class we decided to give tax breaks to big companies, and then we fixed the game to help these big companies in ways that they had just no chance of real failure, and contrary to popular republican belief instead of them deciding to hire people because they are making so much money they put it in their pockets, again because demand did not really rise that is just extra money made.
      At least Obama has been pushing the right direction, and would have done more if he could have.
      I think there could be some really good stimulus ideas, training people for jobs in the United States Army Corps of Engineers or something that would not only provide some money during the time the train, but mostly get them ready to be hired again. Sure better than paying people not to work.

    64. Re:reflects well by Sollord · · Score: 2

      Man just picture Biden as President and all the fun that would be had

    65. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that logic, telling you your mother is ugly would be a big compliment to Linux.

    66. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Romney is mentally ill - a danger to himself and others.

      He's not simply ignorant - he's delusional.

      Romney thinks he's the Mormon saviour - that he will fulfil the White Horse Prophecy and lead the US into the final war and a new Mormon theocracy to rule the world.

    67. Re:reflects well by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      That entirely depends on audience he's speaking to.

    68. Re:reflects well by ynp7 · · Score: 1

      Example: If Linus feels that all women should be raped, that would not make anybody look good.

      If Linus felt that all women should be raped he'd probably be backing Romney for president instead of calling him a moron.

    69. Re:reflects well by sturle · · Score: 1

      It actually saved the taxpayers money because his house is truly "green" and is much easier to secure than the White House.

      Yeah, the White House was completely open and abandoned in those three years. No security at all. In fact there are still homeless people living in the attic.

      Strange that I didn't see Obama meeting with any world leaders on any of his trips to Hawaii.

      Me neither, but I couldn't see him all the time of course.

      I don't recall Merkel tagging along when they went to a Broadway show. I didn't see Netanyahu with Obama on The View or David Letterman.

      I'm sure both Merkel and Netanyahu have better things to do than watch Broadway shows with Obama. Such people usually prefer to talk in a more private atmosphere. I don't recall Bismarck tagging along Abraham Lincoln in Ford's Theatre either, by the way. Bad US presidents not hanging out with foreigners allt he time.

      And when Bush was on vacation, the unemployment rates was not over 6%.

      Nope. The breaking down of U.S. enconomy employed a lot of people full time. Many people even had two or three jobs to do it properly.

      People can't find jobs while Michelle is whooping it up in Aspen on the backs of the taxpayer.

      Yeah, because it's all his wife's fault and responsibility. G. W. Bush didn't destroy the U.S. economy. Barabara did!

    70. Re:reflects well by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Romney is a Republican so to get nominated he has to be anti-Obama and everything he has done, and positively non-Liberal

      To get elected he will have to mostly agree with Obama and everything he has done, and appeal to the majority

      Politicians are two faced for a reason....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    71. Re:reflects well by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      It might be nice if a sitting president didn't have to spend much of his 4th year in a reelection campaign, but I'm not sure how to do that.

      Apart from "do a good enough job over the first three years."

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    72. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And who's F**king Mormonic idea was it"

      There fixed that for ya.

    73. Re:reflects well by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I keep hearing that president's life is protected to protect us all from such a turmoil. How well do we think we know the imaginary turmoil would actually happen? Who gives a hoot if the president is alive?

      The traditional way of predicting what will happen involves examining similar occurrences in the past. Fortunately, for this case there is a example that is still within living memory.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    74. Re:reflects well by udachny · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ron Paul got to say plenty. He said he'd stop the wars and bring all troops home. He said he wanted to cut a Trillion dollars in the first year, eliminate 5 departments and balance the budget by the year 3. He said he wanted to eliminate IRS and audit the Fed and eventually eliminate the Fed. He said he wanted to legalize freedoms, so that no federal government bureaucrat could tell you what to eat, drink, smoke, ingest or who to marry or how to run your business.

      He said plenty, he wasn't received well by most Republicans or Democrats for it.

    75. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good for Linus, seriously.

      Mitt's embracing of Objectivism (Ayn Rand) is not just a Republican issue, it's pretty much how
      Mormons are taught to think and believe. Mitt really believes 47% of hard working U.S. Americans
      are receiving something they don't deserve - yet refuses to release his tax returns.

      Most of those payday loan operations are run/owned by Mormons.

      I don't believe the current guy has done a great job, either. But at least we know what we have and to expect.

    76. Re:reflects well by StoneyMahoney · · Score: 1

      (disclaimer: not an American, don't live there)

      There was a documentary on the BBC in 2010, a one-off special about the Tea Party (http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00vv3pl). There were some quite disturbing sections in this program, with political novices holding Tea Parties and parroting some blatantly incorrect political rhetoric straight from a script written by FreedomWorks (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedomworks). While the efforts made to increase political engagement in the general population should be applauded, the manner in which this fledgling movement was hijacked to rewrite the Republican agenda is quite shocking. The injection of language and narrow set of issues these people brought with them really does seem to have pushed the entire party even further to the right than ever. If Romney is really a moderate in disguise, the very fact he has to wear a disguise to be accepted by his own party shows just how much damage the Tea Party has done to the political balance of the USA.

      My own personal dilemma is whether to post this or mod here instead... If you're reading this, you'll know which way I went.

    77. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And why does everyone keep replace letters with asterisks? Is there really anyone out there who doesn't read "f**cking" as "fucking"? Does anyone care what such a naive, non-inquisitive, hidden from reality person thinks anyway? What is this odd pointless coyness all about? Is it the same urge that drives people to pick up on things that no--one would give a shit about if swear words weren't used?

    78. Re:reflects well by Robert+Zenz · · Score: 1

      ...and your point is?

    79. Re:reflects well by garaged · · Score: 1

      So, being drunk at 4 PM daily is called hard work when you are president?

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    80. Re:reflects well by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. It's Linus and he's at it again! Another classic going straight to the archive...

      --
      Here be signatures
    81. Re:reflects well by sd4f · · Score: 1

      That cost probably stems more from the cult of personality and unwarranted deification of the president.

    82. Re:reflects well by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Is there really anyone out there who doesn't read "f**cking" as "fucking"?

      I read f*cking as fucking but f**cking is a bit more
      ambiguous.

      --
    83. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Torvalds looks, as always, like an idiot. Can't he just shut his mouth?

    84. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linus is free to say whatever the fuck he feels like saying. Romney is a public figure and as such, people are entitled to express their private opinions about a public figure.

    85. Re:reflects well by Seeteufel · · Score: 1

      FOSS - F stands for the F-word, O for Obama, SS for Schutzstaffel, not Stallman Squadron. Not to be mistaken for Free Software, where we refer you to the expert sermon of Mr. GNU/Richard GNU/M. GNU/Stallman.

    86. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is the tradeoff we make between protecting our top leaders", actually the words lead, leadership or leader do not show up in the Constitution.
      Lest YOU forget, they are here to represent us NOT lead us.

    87. Re:reflects well by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2

      Is there really anyone out there who doesn't read "f**cking" as "fucking"?

      Hey, how about a Spoiler Alert next time? Sheesh Man, show some courtesy.

    88. Re:reflects well by aliquis · · Score: 1

      It's hard to be humble when you know you are right.

    89. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      " As Evangelical Christians, we also desire to convert Mormons and the state of Utah in particular to the real Jesus Christ." I get the feeling the makers of that site are not colpletely bat-shit free themselves ;-). Not very impartial I guess. From what I have seen Mormonism and Scientology are not crazier than other religions, just more recently invented and thus less ingrained in our cultural heritage.

    90. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That hardly matters. They were too busy working on the invasion plan for Iraq to worry about one little PDB. Or three other warnings before that...

      The direct warnings to Mr. Bush about the possibility of a Qaeda attack began in the spring of 2001. By May 1, the Central Intelligence Agency told the White House of a report that “a group presently in the United States” was planning a terrorist operation. Weeks later, on June 22, the daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be “imminent,” although intelligence suggested the time frame was flexible.

      - Kurt Eichenwald, NYTimes Op-Ed.

    91. Re:reflects well by Raenex · · Score: 1

      To get elected he will have to mostly agree with Obama and everything he has done, and appeal to the majority

      No, he hasn't done that. About the only thing he publicly agrees with on Obama is about killing Osama bin Laden. Everything else he just states that Obama is doing the wrong thing.

      Politicians are two faced for a reason....

      I understand that, but Romney is like a blade of grass in the wind, extreme even by political standards. About the only thing that he's shown any constancy in is greed/ambition and Mormonism.

    92. Re:reflects well by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      Is there really anyone out there who doesn't read "f**cking" as "fucking"?

      I read f*cking as fucking but f**cking is a bit more ambiguous.

      The asterisk indicates there is zero or more of the preceding element.

    93. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Romney's opening windows comment was a joke. Just like Linux. Fagware

    94. Re:reflects well by silentcoder · · Score: 0

      >>the fact that he's spending more time of the golf course than with his financial advisors and his national security team combined

      >In nearly 3-1/2 years (1200 days), he's played 100 rounds of golf

      Now let's put some context on that. During his first year in office, G.W. Bush spent 184 days (that's rather more than half the year) on vacation.

      Man, I wouldn't mind a job where I can get paid millions of dollars for working roughly 5 months a year...

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    95. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but usually they make time to meet with our allies instead of giving them the brush to do The View. This guy is so busy campaigning he doesn't have time to do the job he'd like to have for four more years. And quite frankly I think that may not be a bad thing. I've seen what he's done while "working" and we might all be better off if all he did for the remainder of his term was just campaign.

    96. Re:reflects well by jbolden · · Score: 1

      True, true. Very good point.

    97. Re:reflects well by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      How about they all suck, and folks should stop defending/following/praising politicians who are volunteers for a job where they work for the public and are supposed to follow the US Constitution.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    98. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he was worth reelecting he'd have something to stand on like.... I don't know his record? Oh crap, that's right he'd rather no one look at that, so he has no other choice but to campaign like there's no tomorrow hoping that everyone will overlook what he's done thus far. An incumbant is usually reelected not because of their campaign, but because of the good they did in their first term. Obama doesn't have that going for him.

    99. Re:reflects well by jbolden · · Score: 1

      He's not being himself in any of this and refuses to say anything lest he be branded as a liberal by most of the extreme right in his party. After all, his positions ARE pretty similar to Obama's.

      Exactly. He could have during the last 4 years have spoken in favor of money of Obama's positions that agreed with his own and had a genuine influence on tone. I don't know if he would have won the nomination but he would be doing great in winning presidency.

      Note how even Ron Paul also got pushed so hard to the right that he wasn't even able to say much of anything about his core Libertarian beliefs in the primaries.

      Ron Paul openly spoke in favor of 4% government
      Ron Paul openly spoke about exiting all foreign commitments.
      Ron Paul openly spoke about drug legalization

      I'd say Ron Paul stayed true to his beliefs.

    100. Re:reflects well by jbolden · · Score: 1

      he wasn't received well by most Republicans or Democrats for it.

      In 2005 about 4% of the American people registered as right / libertarians. In 2009 it is looking like more like 15%. I'd say that's rather substantial.

    101. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said plenty, he wasn't received well by most Republicans or Democrats for it.

      Which is funny, as almost right to the end, Ron Paul supporters were like "oh no lots of people on BOTH sides support him! He's going the delegate route! The media's just not reporting it! Not even the official GOP site is reporting all the delegates he's winning! The numbers are covered up! You'll see!"

    102. Re:reflects well by jbolden · · Score: 1

      If you look at who is in Tea Parties they are mostly people who were involved in other right politics: Christian coalition, John Birch, Anti-pornography groups.... Statistically the hard right is down from around 21% to about 17-18% of the population. The story is the collapse of moderate Republicanism so there is no internal counter force.

      I think this has to do with changes in campaign laws. Moderate Republicans are your $5000 donors. With $1m donations, who cares what the $5000 donors think?

    103. Re:reflects well by marcello_dl · · Score: 2

      wildcard vs regex
      the struggle continues

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    104. Re:reflects well by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Demonization was not an American tradition. If anything the opposite. It has been guys like Romney 09-10 who made it a tradition, and put themselves in this box. He very easily could have pointed to areas of agreement frequently and sought to tweak policy where he disagreed.

    105. Re:reflects well by lengau · · Score: 0

      How is that relevant? Being a member of a state senate is hugely different from being a US senator or president.

      --
      I really wanted to change my sig to something witty, but all I could come up with is this.
    106. Re:reflects well by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...which doesn't reflect particularly well on Torvalds. Whether it reflects badly on "the community" really is another issue - given Torvald's approach on, say, the whole BitKeeper fiasco, I often wonder if there is a community there anyway, or just a bunch of people "mostly getting along" because they want Linux "fixed" (that is, supporting and doing whatever it needs to be doing right now right now, but isn't quite yet.)

      Is Romney a moron? Absolutely not.

      The plane window thing was obviously a joke, as Snopes has reported, and wouldn't even be that dumb if it hadn't been (look at the windows on your exit row next time - yes, technically they don't open, but they're built within hatches, and I'd find it believable and reasonable that someone talking off-the-cuff would talk about those windows "opening" - but, in any case, it was a joke about windows opening on planes.) Moreover, the man did a reasonable job as Governor of MA, he ran Bain Capital competently - his detractors are more upset about ethics issues than whether he made good business decisions.

      Is he running a bad campaign? Yes. Has he made dumb comments during the campaign? Yes again. At the same time, is his position untenable? In my view, yes. He has to run a Tea Party campaign because he's a Republican and because he'd lose massive support if he didn't, and unfortunately for him the positions of the Tea Party include some outright batshit crazy crap. And most conservatives don't see that until something, like the "47%" comment, leaves the echo chamber and goes worldwide, facing the exposure it didn't when it was repeated by people who wanted it to mean what they wanted it to mean. Wait - you mean the 47% includes pensioners, and infantrymen, and students and people who are literally between jobs but have worked all their lives and probably will work until they retire? Oh! Somehow Michelle Malkin never mentioned that!

      Mitt's major misjudgement was to run now, rather than let the extremists have their day and then run as a Unity candidate - as Obama did in 2008, in 2016. But a misjudgement or two does not make you a moron.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    107. Re:reflects well by Hatta · · Score: 1

      He's closer to, say, a Texas Democrat or Oregon Republican (read: fairly moderate)

      Indeed. We could expect him to govern just like Obama.

      who was pushed into the feeding frenzy that is Washington politics.

      Pushed into it? This has always been Romney's ambition. Romney chose not to stand for anything in order to get his chance to surpass his father.

      Note how even Ron Paul also got pushed so hard to the right

      No, that's the real Ron Paul and why no one in their right mind would vote for him.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    108. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my pesonal experience it seems that the majority of people registering as Liberterians are just republicans too ashamed to label themselves as such any more

    109. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His whole "anti-war" argument is just smoke and mirrors. Don't believe for a second that Ron Paul as president would mean we would no longer go to or participate in war. The only difference is that currently we have a volunteer military. Under Paul we would have a variety of conscripted militaries, the result of the complete abolition of worker's rights. Sure the US army wouldn't invade Iran, instead it would be done by a conglomerate operation of Texaco, Intel, Boeing, and Coca-cola. The military of those combined companies would be their regular employees, who were told they could either pick up arms and ship off, or go look for another job (of which none would be available as they would be permanently blacklisted for not fighting).

      So if you hate working 40 hour weeks for full time pay with benefits, vote Ron Paul. If you hate getting overtime pay when you work more, vote Ron Paul. If you hate being granted basic human rights as an employee, vote Ron Paul. If you think human slavery is not a completely bad idea, vote Ron Paul.

      If you want actual rights, go as far away from Ron Paul as you possibly can. Ron Paul's platform represents rights for large corporations, that is clear. Rights for individuals, however, would be largely destroyed. All the worker's rights that have been fought over for decades in this country would go out the window immediately if Ron Paul had his way.

      And don't think that he actually wants you to be able to smoke pot. He just wants you to pay taxes on your pot so that his own taxes are reduced.

    110. Re:reflects well by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Lets be fair - it wasn't Bush doing anything. The man was incompetent. It was his cabinet that (mis)handled everything. Also, don't forget about Dick "birdshot" Cheney.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    111. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We got a tin foil hat wearing M$ Obama$ $hill here.

    112. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who gives a hoot if the president is alive?

      His fucking family, for one.

      Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees.

    113. Re:reflects well by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      I see it as him being a hater just like everyone else in one fashion or another.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    114. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The president probably gets 500 warnings like that every day. It's not like the report said 'al qaeda hijackers to steal planes and ram them into the pentagon and WTC'. America is a big place, saying Bin Laden (who everyone already knew hated the US and tried to hit us before) is going to attack is not really enough info to do anything with. But my point is that people are always threatening the United States, if that was all the president worried about then he shouldnt be president. they attack us one time in the past 10 years (more than 10 years actually), so worrying about little attacks like that is pretty futile. Where there's a will there's a way. I dont support dubya but you are just nitpicking. There was no specific threat mentioned in the report, and it was basically just rehashing info that was already well known. Somehow you forgot to mention that :D

    115. Re:reflects well by Plekto · · Score: 1

      Romney's ambition has always been to be President, but things have gotten so much worse in the last few years. He's kind of got no options - either join up with the devil and pretend to be one of them, (like half of the members of Congress I suspect) or be his real self and not get the nomination. I find it almost comical how the RNC can't get candidates that legitimately win by a healthy margin(Bush being elected by the Supreme court's 5-4 decision is not a "win") because anyone who would get the nomination is unelectable, and anyone who would win the election can't survive the primaries.

      Republicans love to say how great Regan was. Today, he wouldn't make it to the convention. Jeb Bush (as an example) was thinking about running at one point but gave up as it was clearly a waste of time to try to compete with the fundamentalist fist-pounding, rage-hate about Obama (mostly for no real reason, since he does what Congress wants anyways), and political agenda that was lifted from Ayn Rand. The RNC has completely self-destructed. And now they are throwing Romney under the bus because he's not good enough. No, it's not their morally bankrupt, bigoted, money-worshiping agenda. Of course it isn't. It has to be Romney that's the problem.

      As for Ron Paul, you could see it when abortion, religion, and Obamahate(tm) came up. "me too" was pretty much his answer and he quickly moved on. And there's a TON of stuff he had to leave out because the other candidates would have looked at him like he was from Mars. (instead of like he was from some foreign country, like they did)

    116. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bro if Linus takes a dump I want to know about it. And not just that it happened. I want FRAPS, olfactory recordings, I want snapshots of people's reactions, web logs; I want that turd to have its own twitter page.

    117. Re:reflects well by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      What is Romney's policy on FOSS migration?

      He probably thinks it's OK to hunt FOSS when they're migrating but not when they're nesting. But I could be wrong.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    118. Re:reflects well by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Sorry registering in polls. And in terms of libertarians as a party...

      Most of the early libertarians who were animated by social issues and quite often more similar to anarchists became libreraltarians and then liberals. They are in the base of the Democratic party supporting capitalist economics and liberal social policies. The later libertarians, who are conservative on social issues... yeah those are Republicans.

    119. Re:reflects well by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Obama is way more eloquent, patient, and understanding than Bush was, so the overall view of the US has improved from then--it's no longer quite so dangerous for a US citizen to travel to Europe or Asia and admit to being an American.

      The trick is to say you're Canadian. Everybody likes Canadians and no one outside America can tell the difference between the accents.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    120. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...like half the stuff slashdot posts is newsworthy. Every year is slips a little further in to irrelevance.

    121. Re:reflects well by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Romney's ambition has always been to be President, but things have gotten so much worse in the last few years. He's kind of got no options - either join up with the devil and pretend to be one of them,

      And he chose poorly. Emphasis on "chose". No one pushed Romney into anything.

      Republicans love to say how great Regan was. Today, he wouldn't make it to the convention.

      Hell, Obama is the closest thing we've had to Reagan since Reagan.

      The RNC has completely self-destructed

      No, the truth is that the Republicans have won so thoroughly over the past 30 years that they've completely destroyed the Democratic party. The Republican party in name might not have much of a future, but that doesn't matter because conservatives(in the Reagan/Thatcher sense) have completely dominated.

      Thatcher was right, there really is no alternative. Not because there aren't any other good ideas, but because they won't let us vote for them.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    122. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, pretty much all religions sound crazy unless you've been exposed to them all your life.

      The Old Testament God was murderous and surprisingly rape-y, in the New Testament, Jesus climbs out of a tomb, surprisingly not starving for brains, then flies up into the air and is never seen again....

      Flying Zombies?

      Not really that much crazier than Mormonism.

      Even Frisbitarians, who believe when you die your soul goes up on the roof and you can't get it down, don't have a good answer for what happens when the building is inevitably torn down.

    123. Re:reflects well by ak3ldama · · Score: 2

      It does indicate lacking emotional intelligence. What those in the media do not realize is that those within the various software communities usually lack emotional intelligence. It seems to not have that many negative repercussions in open source. You either put up with it or you don't. The pool is large.

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
    124. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're apologizing for Romney and blaming the extreme right wing. The problem with Romney is that he's a spineless wimp, a "perfectly oiled weather vane" as someone put it.

      I'm a progressive, a recovering libertarian actually, so I don't like the right wing to begin with, but anyone who pays attention to politics knows this guy has no real reason for wanting to be POTUS, other than it seems to him that he's entitled to it.

      As for what Linus says, it's about as relevant as who Kim Kardashian supports.

    125. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason that W. didn't do the same was because he knew the elections were gonna be rigged for him.

    126. Re:reflects well by rubikscubejunkie · · Score: 1

      No, he should learn to control himself.

    127. Re:reflects well by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      I often wonder if there is a community there anyway, or just a bunch of people "mostly getting along" because they want Linux "fixed"

      I'm confused. What is the difference?

    128. Re:reflects well by tibit · · Score: 1

      That article doesn't mention anything about the stock or other markets, or financials. Those words don't even appear. It seems that NYSE "plunged" about 3% in the afternoon, on the day of assassination. Not a big deal if you ask me.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    129. Re:reflects well by tibit · · Score: 1

      Couldn't read one sentence down the post, huh? Sigh.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    130. Re:reflects well by tibit · · Score: 1

      I'm not admitting the turmoil would surely appear, neither you or me can really foresee that with any certainity. I admit there's a possibility, but it hasn't really been demonstrated in history. You'd think JFK's assassination would make the markets crash or something. Nothing of the sort happened, and no big scale crash is IMHO likely to happen. Various hotheads will do stupid shit, but in a week it'll be all forgotten about. That's how markets are, usually.

      So, all the brouhaha about U.S. president needing to be safe to prevent world turmoil is IMHO overblown, way, way overblown in fact.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    131. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is Obama's plan on the budget? On the economy? His nominating speech a few weeks ago promised "PERSISTENT EXPERIMENTATION"... how is that a plan? That's a "throw crap at the wall and see what sticks' proposal. It's no way to run a country, not this country anyway!

      How have Obama budgets been good? His latest submitted budgets didn't attain a single vote from his own party in the U.S. Senate, a Senate controlled by Obama's party that hasn't passed a budget in 1,248 days. That's almost 3.5 years.

      If Obama or Pelosi wanted to pass something like WPA, they had that chance in 2009 and 2010. They didn't do it. If higher taxes on millionaires and billionaires was critical to reviving the economy, they had that chance in 2009 and 2010. They didn't do it.

      "Yes we can" has become "No we didn't."

    132. Re:reflects well by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Nancy Pelosi passed over 400 major bills in 2009-2010. Harry Reid couldn't deal with Republican filibusters. But she did pass legislation through her chamber.

    133. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " He has some connection to the product that he created, but essentially doesn't actually do anything meaningful at this point."....
      Do you know where you are dude ? kernel 3.4 ....device drivers and no Linus ?...>>>>head to Fox

    134. Re:reflects well by Plekto · · Score: 1

      So after both parties come apart at the seams, what's going to happen? It is rather appalling that they have managed to shift politics so far to the right that basically we have New Republican and Fundamentalist to chose from. There isn't even a real moderate position, let alone anything truly progressive, liberal, libertarian, or that supports The Constitution.

      I used to joke that it's a choice between Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum. Now, It's not really that funny any more.

    135. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I know is that this posts moronic idea reflects poorly on the rest of the Slashdot community. ;-)

    136. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not Gerald Ford

    137. Re:reflects well by Hatta · · Score: 1

      So after both parties come apart at the seams, what's going to happen?

      I'm guessing that's when the purges happen.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    138. Re:reflects well by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

      That's why we need to take a serious look at Gary Johnson. We need a good steward of taxpayer's dollars.
      Live free.

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    139. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He doesn't come from Massachusetts. He comes from Detroit, Michigan. An "aide said had been a resident of Belmont, Mass., for 30 years", but you have only Romney's and his aide's word to go on.

      If only there were some official record of that somewhere that could back up or disprove that assertion.

      I guess now we know why he doesn't like people looking at his tax filings. He saw a political opportunity in Massachusetts while he claimed on his tax returns that he was a resident of Utah, and ran for governor there.

    140. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to get my credible information from the source, not a group known to have a financial interest in keeping their members in the dark. I thought this scientific/technical community used common sense. Why not use the scientific method? Try it out, experiment. Read what Mormons have to say. Read the Book of Mormon and see if can improve your life. Anything taken out of context can sound strange. Let me give you an analogy about a car... oh never mind.

    141. Re:reflects well by DrChandra · · Score: 1

      Honesty, yes, but how about journalistic integrity? Linus has since recanted his statements. The community doesn't look so good when it repeats older parts of a changing story. It also doesn't do Linus any good to keep characterizing him based on his first statements. He would probably rather be judged on what was said in it's entirety. Slashdot does not look good putting this across with this headline. This is how media bias is practiced.

      --
      Words, words, words ... Buz, buz! - Hamlet, Act II, Scene II
    142. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in the New Testament, Jesus climbs out of a tomb, surprisingly not starving for brains, then flies up into the air and is never seen again....

      Flying Zombies?

      Jesus was a time-traveler from the future with a starship and advanced medical technology. Doesn't anybody read the Bible these days?

    143. Re:reflects well by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      About "baptizing dead jews":

      My grandfather converted to Mormonism late in life. My grandmother, a Lutheran by birth (if not practicing later in life) had passed away a decade before. My grandfather decided to have her posthumously baptized Mormon. This does not mean that she is now automagically (that was originally a typo, but I thought it fit in this context) Mormon against her will. According to the Mormon faith, her soul now has the option of accepting or rejecting Mormonism.

      It's no stranger than other religious practices, and is actually a lot more reasonable than some.

      How is "getting their own planet" any stranger than other religions' views on Heaven?

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    144. Re:reflects well by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Baptizing dead people is the least crazy part of the mormon religion. I think Christians should start doing it too. I think it shows that these people want everyone to go to heaven (or whetever good version of the afterlife they believe in). I find Mormons to be in general, thoughtful and nice people. The Mormon religion is in fact batshit crazy, but no more so than any other religion. If you believe baptism does something positive for people, and you believe that it can be done postmortem, then it is not so crazy to then deduce that you should be baptizing dead people, if you like being nice. The difference between Christians and Mormons on this issue is only about whether you think dead people *can* be baptized effectively. I don't think either point of view regarding how this imaginary mechanism functions is any more valid than the other. I do find one to be more inclusive and good-natured. SO what if they are baptizing people "against their will". If you aren't Mormon, then all they are doing is reading a name and swimming. They are trying to do something nice, but are actually doing nothing. Sounds like a more involved version of someone praying for me. I don't care if people want to waste their time praying for me. In fact even if I were offended, I don't think I have a right not to be offended. I think their religious freedom gives them the right to baptize me, as long as it doesn't actually involve me at all (like how it is done currently), just like it would be my right to baptize the whole world for Satan if I wanted to.

    145. Re:reflects well by Slyfox696 · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, then clearly Romney's position is that Genachowski is a socialist, and Romney believes in closed standards and closed access. Romney also feels very strongly on FOSS vs. commercial.

      (My comment was more mocking the tone of elections, where the challenger seems to stand for everything the opposite of his opponent.)

    146. Re:reflects well by binarybod · · Score: 1

      Linux isn't a truly free and open kernel. Linus has accepted binary blobs into the code. RMS doesn't consider it to be truly free and open.

    147. Re:reflects well by pseudorand · · Score: 1

      I just donated to Obama to enter to win dinner with him. Why? So I can give him a piece of my mind. I have no respect for the office of the President (or any political office for that matter) and I wouldn't hesitate to skip eating all together so I could barrage him with everything I think he's doing wrong.

      But if I could win dinner with Linus, I think I'd be a bit more respectful. Despite the fact that I actually know a thing or two about computers and have a CS degree, while I have no formal training in and know next to nothing about international politics and economics. I find myself having some respect for the office of leader of the Linux Kernel.

      Maybe that's just because I understand the difficulty it writing a working OS kernel and therefore empathize with Linus while politics always seems like "idiots, why can't they just...". Or maybe politicians really are all greedy, idiots or both.

    148. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha. Funny. Not. So, what is so bat-shit crazy? How are Mormons more weird than any religion?

      Let's say you believe in the great unseen mysterious entity in the sky called God. If you believe that, then you must believe the Bible (the source of all the God info). If you believe in the Bible, then you must believe in Jesus, since the entire Old Testament is all about prophesy and preparing for his coming, and the New Testament is all about what he did for the world, and what everyone is supposed to do until he comes again.

      If you believe all that, like the Mormons do, then you might want to have an answer to the dilemma, that according to the Bible everyone must be baptized into Christ's church to be saved, but not everyone does before they die; so is the majority of the world's population damned then? Well, the Mormons have a solution, that has some vague reference to it in the Bible, which is to stand in as a proxy for someone who has already died, and be baptized for them.

      Christ also makes a statement in the Bible where he says "in my Father's house there are many mansions; I go to prepare a place for you." Well, if you're a deity, what is a mansion to you? Oprah's house? Trump's penthouse in Manhattan? If the whole universe is your playground, then why can't an entire planet be a mansion? There's certainly enough space out there.

      I'm not saying that is the case, and I'm not saying that it isn't. I'm just saying that believing that you might inherit a planet in the after-life is no more crazy than believing that God exists in the first place.

      (Disclaimer, I'm one of those people who does believe in God.)

    149. Re:reflects well by jep305 · · Score: 1

      Take your pick:

      A) Ghost fucks a virgin, then kills resulting son, but son comes back to life. Eat son's flesh and drink his blood, or burn forever.
      B) Ghost carves instructions on tablets, gives them to some dude when nobody else is around. Dude wanders with his people for 40 years, and now have perpetual claim on the nice land they finally stumbled upon.
      C) Ghost writes instructions on metal sheets, shows them to some dude when nobody else is around. Metal sheets disappear before anyone else can verify them. Dude takes a bunch of people to Utah, and is REALLY into banging a lot of women. You get to (eventually) have your own planet if you're good.
      D) Souls of billions are flown to earth in a giant DC-8 by an intergalactic warlord who blows them up with H-Bombs. What's left of them is eating your soul right now.

      Is one of these options really any less ridiculous than any other?

      --
      In Reason We Trust
    150. Re:reflects well by ZeroMS · · Score: 1

      And he would be a goddamn good president too.

    151. Re:reflects well by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yes, and if they don't send back what he wants, he vetos it and the government shuts down until they balance the budget. Clinton did this more than once. For someone lecturing others on how it works, you seem to not get it.

    152. Re:reflects well by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      He said plenty, he wasn't received well by most Republicans or Democrats for it.

      You mis-spelled "normal people".

      What libertarians/Randians always seem to overlook is that the principle of enlightened self-interest (or selfishness) applies to society as a whole, not just individuals. The majority of people are happier with a system that provides some shelter from the brutality of pure laissez faire capitalism, because the majority of non-billionaires end up with worse lives under that system.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    153. Re:reflects well by udachny · · Score: 1

      What you mean to say is that most people are happy to steal from others and using a government to do it removes the necessity to take the gun into your own hands, because most people wouldn't take guns in their own hands and go robbing people, most people would be too scared to do it on their own, but when a government promises to do so, then it's all OK.

      Well, here is the problem, most people, the problem is that you think the system can continue operating that way indefinitely, it cannot. People who have their productivity stolen from them either lose their businesses (voluntarily or not) or move their businesses, and eventually that society falls apart.

      Can't have an economy based on theft.

    154. Re:reflects well by farrellj · · Score: 1

      A PRIMER FOR ERISIAN EVANGELISTS
      by Lord Omar

      The SOCRATIC APPROACH is most successful when confronting the ignorant. The "socratic approach" is what you call starting an argument by asking questions. You approach the innocent and simply ask "Did you know that God's name is ERIS, and that He is a girl?" If he should answer "Yes." then he probably is a fellow Erisian and so you can forget it. If he says "No." then quickly proceed to:

      THE BLIND ASSERTION and say "Well, He is a girl, and His name is ERIS!" Shrewedly observe if the subject is convinced. If he is, swear him into the Legion of Dynamic Discord before he changes his mind. If he does not appear convinced, then proceed to:

      THE FAITH BIT: "But you must have Faith! All is lost without Faith! I sure feel sorry for you if you don't have Faith." And then add:

      THE ARGUMENT BY FEAR and in an ominous voice ask "Do you know what happens to those who deny Goddess?" If he hesitates, don't tell him that he will surely be reincarnated as a precious Mao Button and distributed to the poor in the Region of Thud (which would be a mean thing to say), just shake your head sadly and, while wiping a tear from your eye, go to:

      THE FIRST CLAUSE PLOY wherein you point to all of the discord and confusion in the world and exclaim "Well who the hell do you think did all of this, wise guy?" If he says, "Nobody, just impersonal forces." then quickly respond with:

      THE ARGUMENT BY SEMANTICAL GYMNASTICS and say that he is absolutely right, and that those impersonal forces are female and that Her name is ERIS. If he, wonder of wonders, still remains obstinate, then finally resort to:

      THE FIGURATIVE SYMBOLISM DODGE and confide that sophisticated people like himself recognize that Eris is a Figurative Symbol for an Ineffable Metaphysical Reality and that The Erisian Movement is really more like a poem than like a science and that he is liable to be turned into a Precious Mao Button and Distributed to The Poor in The Region of Thud if he does not get hip. Then put him on your mailing list.

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    155. Re:reflects well by jep305 · · Score: 1

      Hail Discordia!

      --
      In Reason We Trust
    156. Re:reflects well by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      People at a cinema are also mostly getting along, because they want to watch a movie, and if any were actively anti-social it'd be a problem. I'd hardly call them a community.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    157. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't have an economy based on theft.

      You advocate openly an economy that is based on exploitation. Most people view exploitation as a specific kind of theft. Ergo, you are admitting in that statement that the system you pine for won't work.

      Thank you for playing.

    158. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait? What is the outright batshit crazy crap from the tea party? Or is that one of those things you just lob out there and hope people latch on to it. Like if I were to say Linux is way worse than Windows because Linux has some batshit crazy stuff in it.

    159. Re:reflects well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gave you an example. Learn to read.

  3. Listening to the video by rolfwind · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had no clue in Romney's tone or anything else he was joking.

    1. Re:Listening to the video by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Funny

      Romneybot isn't programmed for the emotion known as "humor."

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:Listening to the video by ThorGod · · Score: 0

      The guy's a better gaff machine that Joe Biden ever could be (Romney, that is).

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    3. Re:Listening to the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A Republican gaffe is when they state their party platform in public.

    4. Re:Listening to the video by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      you never heard of spin?

    5. Re:Listening to the video by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nonsense. He took lessons in standup from Al Gore.

    6. Re:Listening to the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately, Mr telprompter is scripted.

    7. Re:Listening to the video by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A Republican gaffe is when they state their party platform in public.

      You got that right. 98% of the Republican party's difficulties come from the fact that they have to pretend they're about something other than plutocracy.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    8. Re:Listening to the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, Al Gore invented stand up comedy, so I can imagine that.

    9. Re:Listening to the video by bmo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The thing about Joe Biden's gaffes is that at the end of it, you wind up liking him anyway, because when he gaffes, he speaks what he's really thinking, and he shows that he's not a vile, emotionless robot like Romney is.

      FFS, y'all should see his talk on grief he gave at TAPS. Bring tissues.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwZ6UfXm410

      --
      BMO

    10. Re:Listening to the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      AC 'cause I've moderated, but everybody there including the reporter knew he was joking..

      According to New York Magazine:

      The Los Angeles Times story that relayed Romney's airplane remark to the world was based off a pool report written by the New York Times's Ashley Parker. When we asked Parker whether it seemed as if Romney made the mark in jest, she left no doubt. "Romney was joking," she e-mailed. Parker told us that while the pool report didn't explicitly indicate that Romney was joking, it was self-evident that he was. "The pool report provided the full transcript of his comments on Ann's plane scare," she said, "and it was clear from the context that he was not being serious."

    11. Re:Listening to the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had no clue in Romney's tone or anything else he was joking.

      I get the same impression about this when I see it. Of course, there are brain farts and ignorance... and then there are bald-faced lies.

    12. Re:Listening to the video by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

      A Republican gaffe is when they state their party platform in public.

      You got that right. 98% of the Republican party's difficulties come from the fact that they have to pretend they're about something other than plutocracy.

      Sigh... If I was clever I would have said "99%".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    13. Re:Listening to the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vile and emotionless? I know him and the guy is in fact kind and generous. Just because he doesn't vainly advertise his charitable deeds doesn't mean they don't exist. Why don't you get to know somebody first before passing ignorant judgement?

    14. Re:Listening to the video by matunos · · Score: 1

      It's not his fault. The emotion chip is not yet ready for production use.

    15. Re:Listening to the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had no clue in Romney's tone or anything else he was joking.

      I'm not surprised. I'm not from the U.S. so there might be some cultural differences but I can't honestly say that I would be able to tell the difference between Romney and one of the fake politicians on the Grand Theft Auto radio channels.
      I mean, he pretty much says that he is going to screw over anyone who isn't a personal friend of his. There has to be thousands of republicans that would be a better candidate than Romney.

    16. Re:Listening to the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then on the other side you have Joe Biden; the never-ending gaffe-o-matic. He is good for laughs though.

    17. Re:Listening to the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did we watch the same video, but it was pretty damn obvious to me. Or are you joking, and I have no clue you are?

    18. Re:Listening to the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you are clueless.

    19. Re:Listening to the video by zlives · · Score: 1

      "Ai Gore" FTFY

    20. Re:Listening to the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not about plutocracy. Remember, Pluto's no longer a planet. The Republicans are about uranusocracy.

    21. Re:Listening to the video by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      I had no clue in Romney's tone or anything else he was joking.

      Romney is a lot of things (disingenuous, deceitful, hypocritical to name just a few), but it's obvious from watching the video that he was trying to be funny. His hardware and software just aren't programmed for it.

    22. Re:Listening to the video by MutualFun · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. He took lessons in standup from Al Gore.

      Oh man, I really did LOL. Embarrassing here at work too... thanks!

    23. Re:Listening to the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a female Republican who is hoping and praying Gov. Romney is elected.
      We need jobs, open up this country and we can be excelling in every field. Schools would be vibrant. Young people could find work before they decide on a profession without exposure to many venues. NASA would not be just a proud memory. Strength in our military does not encourage attacks from rivals.

      It would be nice to to be proud of a President who visits with leaders of others countries.

    24. Re:Listening to the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Republican gaffe is when they state their party platform in public.

      The party platforms of both the Republican and Democrat Parties are written by the most fervent party supporters, generally political outliers. Doesn't matter much anyway. Neither party makes much effort to actually implement the more radical aspects of their platforms.

      You got that right. 98% of the Republican party's difficulties come from the fact that they have to pretend they're about something other than plutocracy.

      Both the Democrat and the Republican Parties are controlled by a self-anointed elite. The Democrat Party is more of a plutocracy than the Republican Party, which only makes sense since the Democrat Party tries to put the government and the people who control the government in charge of every aspect of everyone's lives. It is no accident that the super wealthy - Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, etc. - are all supporters of the DP. The Republican Party at least has some major factions which want the government and the plutocrats which control the government to just leave people alone. The DP is composed of the super rich, moochers and foolish young people who haven't figured out yet that the DP controls the education system from Kindergarten thru terminal degree programs and uses that control to brainwash students. The ideas that the RP advocates plutocracy and DP is for the little guy are the characterizations that the DP makes about itself and about its opposition.

      I'm a little surprised that Black Parrot didn't mention how racist and anti-women the RP is since that's also part of the DP's characterization of the RP despite the lack of supporting evidence.

    25. Re:Listening to the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Romney's dry humor; I took this same as "screen doors in a submarine" -- a joke I learned before Linus was BORN... Linus will mature eventually.

    26. Re:Listening to the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He would be immune to the adverse effects of decompression and high altitude due to his special Mormon underwear.

    27. Re:Listening to the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its difficult to actually advance a platform of responsible government rather than Gays and giveaways.

    28. Re:Listening to the video by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      And actually, if you read what Snopes actually had to say about the story, they didn't say that he was joking either. Snopes basically said that Romney didn't express genuine confusion about why planes windows don't open, which is kind of true enough. First Romney criticized the fact that plane windows couldn't open, he was quite serious about it since he was talking about his wife's incident, and then he kind of just dismissed any of the reasoning behind the design decisions.

      So yes, he did say a pretty stupid thing, and Snopes agrees with me on that, but is this really important at all?

      Even smart people say stupid things some times. And Mitt Romney is definitely not stupid. Personally, Mitt Romney scares me and he doesn't scare me because he's stupid (as some of the candidates in the past have scared me). Mitt Romney scares me precisely because he's a very smart and shrewd experienced corporate raider, and it scares the hell out of me that the Republican base would even consider such a candidate in the first place.

    29. Re:Listening to the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how ignorant you are. It is actually opposite. Don't you see your persistent acting as aristocrat already?
      Republicans just want to reduce barriers for business. If you don't understand, I will explain.
      By doing business wealth is created for everyone it is not a zero sum game. If it were then Karl Marx would be 100% right.
      But I guess Economics is not your strong side as well as many here on this forum.
      You actually think Republicans are racist and Dems are smart.
      Insolence is not smart unfortunately, so you need to try harder.

      BTW I've seen the video and he says:
      ".... there is no place to go exactly, ... there is no .. and you can't find any oxygen from the outside of
      the aircraft to get in the aircraft because the windows do not open .. I don't know why they don't do that ... but its a real problem so it was really dangerous ... "

      phrase " I don't know why they don't do that " - does not imply he wants them to be open
      " its a real problem " - refers to is his wife's situation being really dangerous
      if you do not get this then go to ESL classes...
      FYI watching politico hacks is like making rubber from your brains, you better listen to H. Chavez

  4. Come on Slashdot, seriously? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those having issues understanding the summary, here's the plain text:

    'a f***ing moron' = ' a fucking moron'

    'bats**t crazy' = 'batshit crazy'

    Hope this helps.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Come on Slashdot, seriously? by siddesu · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I am a right-wing shithead, and I still don't get the joke. What was funny?

    2. Re:Come on Slashdot, seriously? by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      Thank you. And why you are pointing out facts.. 'However, the vitriol and obscenities are unprofessional at best.' = ' Remove him from the board of directors.

      --doh!

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    3. Re:Come on Slashdot, seriously? by jo42 · · Score: 1

      The word you are looking for to refer to Romney and his ilk is "Republicantard".

      You can also refer to him as Romneytard (just like Bushtard before him).

    4. Re:Come on Slashdot, seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL ROMNEH TROLLED U

    5. Re:Come on Slashdot, seriously? by kerohazel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Weird, I was seeing something different:
      'fhunter2ing moron' and 'batshunter2t crazy'

      --
      Skype is too convoluted... Now I'm reverse-engineering the Kyoto Protocol.
    6. Re:Come on Slashdot, seriously? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Oh, is that what he meant.
      I was under the impression that he was a felting moron and batslut crazy.

      Regarding whether it's appropriate to call out batshit craziness when seen, let me paraphrase P. Z. Myers:
      Until Torvalds has trained in the shops of Paris and Milan, until he has learned to tell the difference between a ruffled flounce and a puffy pantaloon, we should all pretend he has not spoken out against the Emperor's taste. His training of observation may give him the ability to recognize dangling genitalia when he sees it, but it has not taught him the proper appreciation of Imaginary Fabrics.

      How anyone can claim that a person who believes in a god living on a planet named Kolob that's brighter than anything else in the sky and rotates once per 1000 years, who needs you to dunk yourself under water on behalf of dead people and wants you to wear underwear with magical properties, and tells you you will become a god of your own planet in the future is not batsmut crazy is beyond my understanding.

    7. Re:Come on Slashdot, seriously? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      It's a reference to something that happened in IRC. http://www.bash.org/?244321

    8. Re:Come on Slashdot, seriously? by siddesu · · Score: 1

      Both the joke and the hissy fits the left are throwing are pathetic. Lack of charisma and ability in our esteemed leaders make me cringe. I guess we get what we deserve, though.

    9. Re:Come on Slashdot, seriously? by kyriosdelis · · Score: 2

      From bash.org :

      Cthon98: hey, if you type in your pw, it will show as stars
      Cthon98: ********* see!
      AzureDiamond: hunter2
      AzureDiamond: doesnt look like stars to me
      Cthon98: AzureDiamond: *******
      Cthon98: thats what I see
      AzureDiamond: oh, really?
      Cthon98: Absolutely
      AzureDiamond: you can go hunter2 my hunter2-ing hunter2
      AzureDiamond: haha, does that look funny to you?
      Cthon98: lol, yes. See, when YOU type hunter2, it shows to us as *******
      AzureDiamond: thats neat, I didnt know IRC did that
      Cthon98: yep, no matter how many times you type hunter2, it will show to us as *******
      AzureDiamond: awesome!
      AzureDiamond: wait, how do you know my pw?
      Cthon98: er, I just copy pasted YOUR ******'s and it appears to YOU as hunter2 cause its your pw
      AzureDiamond: oh, ok.

      --
      I don't mind dating a girl that has been with everybody, as long as she had a good shower afterwards.
    10. Re:Come on Slashdot, seriously? by allo · · Score: 1

      why ever TFS was censored anyway. WTF, slashdot?!

    11. Re:Come on Slashdot, seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI: bash.org

    12. Re:Come on Slashdot, seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucking lol, bash.org :)

    13. Re:Come on Slashdot, seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is in reference to a funny post about one dude's password being "hunter2". Look it up on Google for some short amusement.

    14. Re:Come on Slashdot, seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just got me fired. Thanks.

    15. Re:Come on Slashdot, seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    16. Re:Come on Slashdot, seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny, what you wrote right now, still comes out as 'f***ing moron' and 'bats**t crazy' on my screen, weird.

    17. Re:Come on Slashdot, seriously? by mythix · · Score: 1

      what are you doing?? my 5 year old reads this website!

  5. Nothing wrong with calling it like you see it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Straight talk - no bull shit. Kudos to Linus.

  6. He actually apologized by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Would be nice if the summary mentioned that Linus actually apologized the next day. But I think Linus' original assessment was correct, never mind whether Romney was joking or not.

    --
    If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
    1. Re:He actually apologized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Torvalds should watch out if Romney gets into power - he could get branded a tourist & end up sharing a room in Ecuador-space with Assange...

  7. Linus just need some hormones, that's all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He'll be fine.. Just some relaxing meds and maybe a vacation.. ;)

    1. Re:Linus just need some hormones, that's all by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      He'll be fine.. Just some relaxing meds and maybe a vacation.. ;)

      It was probably him that broke into the Congressman's office, broke the windows with cinder blocks, and installed Linux on a laptop.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  8. Airplane fire expert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thank goodness Linus, the airplane fire expert, chimed in on this and put Romney in his place.

    Also, his expertise in Mormonism and other religions makes his opinion very important.

    Now I await CowboyNeal's input on carpet tack and today's topics will be fully covered by the experts.

    1. Re:Airplane fire expert by Threni · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't need "expertise" in religion (whatever that means) to know that religions are `the stupid virus`, and that Mormonism in particular is really fucking stupid.

      Seriously, if I started a religion today and said that you have to hit your hand with a hammer every morning, does it make hitting your hand with a hammer not stupid? If not, what test have these other, stupid, religions passed which makes them not-stupid but my one stupid?

    2. Re:Airplane fire expert by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Depends. If you genuinely appreciate life more in spite of (or due to) the daily hammering of your hands, is that a bad thing*? The point of religion is to feel better about your life. Some people feel the need to make me feel better about my life using their methodology and try to shove their religion down my throat (or through my chest, depending how important it is to them) and that's not OK, but your peaceful church-on-Sunday folks that just say some crazy crap that doesn't compute tend to not hurt anyone.

      * Medically, yes, duh. Your example might be a little more realistic if it was drinking your own urine, which is relatively harmless albeit weird. Most religious activities are (IMO) relatively harmless albeit weird, so that fits right in line. It's when people start fighting over it that we get problems.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    3. Re:Airplane fire expert by tftp · · Score: 1

      If not, what test have these other, stupid, religions passed which makes them not-stupid but my one stupid?

      There is only one usable test: acceptance by adherents of that religion. This is, IIRC, how at least one "religion," in one (UK) or a couple of countries, crossed the barrier between a movie and the real life (Jedi.)

      Of course if a hundred million people hit their hands with a hammer every morning it does not validate their beliefs. It only validates the religion itself as a set of rituals and ways to think. The rituals themselves may be useless, and the ways to think may be wrong. IMO, all religions are like that (useless) because there is a better proof of existence of UFOs piloted by Chupacabras than of miracles. Modern religions are more like a club of Anonymous Alcoholics, where people come and tell stories to each other. It just makes them feel better - and therefore it works for them - regardless of how true those stories really are. Cartoons and fairy tales for children are rarely factual, but they are useful nevertheless.

    4. Re:Airplane fire expert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The old appeal to authority again. Don't speak out on anything unless you're a so-called "expert", right?

      Those "experts" on the economy and banking have put many countries of this world right down the shitter.
      "Experts" in real estate said it was a good idea to buy when the US housing market was at the top of the bubble.
      "Experts" said it was a good idea to drill holes in your head to release evil spirits at one point in time.

      When it comes to politics, the best advice is to stay as far away from the "experts" as possible.

    5. Re:Airplane fire expert by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Oh please. Atheists are just are ignorant as Theists. At least the Agnostics are intelligent enough to admit it.

      "Hey look, a bunch of people all around the world making up stuff. But, um, maybe one of them is right. Who knows?"

      I call myself an atheist, but that doesn't mean I 100% know for sure that there is no personal god. It's just the evidence so far points to not.

    6. Re:Airplane fire expert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't think any religion has the purpose to make one feel better about his or her life. Where did you come up that?

    7. Re:Airplane fire expert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STOP!

      Hammer time!

    8. Re:Airplane fire expert by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Ultimately most religions boil down to a person or group saying there is this invisible being (or beings) who'll get very, very cross and punish you in some awful way unless you perform ceremonies and obey commands written down and in the care of that religion. If you DO follow these ceremonies and commands you'll be rewarded, obviously not now, but in the afterlife.

      Short of evidence for this invisible being, or the afterlife, or that said invisible being has issued commands to be obeyed it stands that everything that follows is delusional nonsense. The religion is delusional nonsense, the people practicing it are deluded. Usually said religion

      Becoming an "expert" on religion teachings is like becoming an expert on gibberish. Someone might study gibberish and be able to quote it on demand, or be able to "interpret" it to justify their lifestyle. It does not make that person smarter or wiser than a person who chose not to accept the evidence lite premise in the first place. Quite the opposite in fact.

      It would be funny if it weren't for the fact that some people are dumb enough to kill or be killed over their pet deity.

    9. Re:Airplane fire expert by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > but that doesn't mean I 100% know for sure that there is no personal god.

      Which is ignorance. *You* don't *know*.

      There is indeed a way to *know*. You don't know because you don't know your True Self.

      > It's just the evidence I have found so far points to not.
      FTFY.

      If you are looking outwards you will *never* find it; the solution is to look *inwards*.

    10. Re:Airplane fire expert by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I don't believe your asserted fantasies any more than I believe anybody else's.

    11. Re:Airplane fire expert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and which stupid virus do you belong to?

    12. Re:Airplane fire expert by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      That's OK - it is your choice to remain in denial. After you are dead you will realize the missed opportunity to know. Fortunately you will keep getting opportunities until you do, so no worries mate.

    13. Re:Airplane fire expert by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Wow, I am so relieved by your completely unsubstantiated mythology.

    14. Re:Airplane fire expert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need "expertise" in religion (whatever that means) to know that religions are `the stupid virus`, and that Mormonism in particular is really fucking stupid.

      Wow that gets modded up to insightful? You know religion has been around for a long time, believe it or not you are a religious being. Your religion may worship the almighty theory with scientist as its prophets but you still have to have faith. Faith in human knowledge, cause you know we scientists get it right 100% of the time. Religious people are smug in their belief that they are 100% correct and all other belief systems are batshit crazy. (sound familiar) You just another sheep following a different set of shepherds.

      Seriously, if I started a religion today and said that you have to hit your hand with a hammer every morning, does it make hitting your hand with a hammer not stupid? If not, what test have these other, stupid, religions passed which makes them not-stupid but my one stupid?

      Religion is a part of society, its inescapable. Most religions help keep people grounded and encourage behavior acceptable to society. Before you shoot your mouth off you should take a humanities class or two at the collegiate level. You know philosophy, theology, anthropology. And moderators, Who the hell are you people?

    15. Re:Airplane fire expert by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Please show me where I mentioned mythology?

    16. Re:Airplane fire expert by Raenex · · Score: 1

      It was your reincarnation assertion.

  9. Oh my goodness gracious! by mtrachtenberg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "does such outspokenness on non-technical matters reflect poorly on the Linux community that Torvalds leads?"

    Every member of the Linux community checks to see what Linus is wearing before getting dressed in the morning, right? No? Then why are you asking such an apparently stupid question?

    1. Re:Oh my goodness gracious! by rubycodez · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      well, we know what Romney is wearing, his Mormon Holy Underwear with masonic symbols on it that protects him from evil

      what a whackjob cult

    2. Re:Oh my goodness gracious! by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      what a whackjob cult

      Not gonna FTFY.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Oh my goodness gracious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why are you asking such an apparently stupid question?

      More to the point, why am I wasting my time reading responses to it? Oh, right - my call "is very important, but not so very important that we will staff up sufficiently to field it."

    4. Re:Oh my goodness gracious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "does such outspokenness on non-technical matters reflect poorly on the Linux community that Torvalds leads?"

      Choosing a President for his abilities as a stand-up comedian reflects poorly on the Linux community, fer sure.

  10. freedom of speech by Narcocide · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bask in it, motherfuckers.

    1. Re:freedom of speech by Intropy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can celebrate the freedom without celebrating each usage of that freedom.

    2. Re:freedom of speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberty is the freedom to act as we aught, not the license to do as we please.

      Perhaps the Statue of Liberty needs a sister on the west coast, the Statue of Responsibility.

    3. Re:freedom of speech by tftp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can celebrate the freedom without celebrating each usage of that freedom.

      By simple reasoning you then start celebrating a freedom that has no usage whatsoever. For example, you can say again and again that the USA is the most free country in the world, or that it has the lowest taxes and the best business climate. It's very convenient when people learn a dogma without any proof of its validity today. That's why a freedom must be exercised, and only those exercises should be celebrated - and failures to exercise a freedom must be noted and counter-celebrated. Otherwise you will end up with First Amendment Zones, and the only allowed freedom of speech will be the freedom to wholeheartedly agree with the powerful of this world - and only when it's convenient for them.

    4. Re:freedom of speech by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 2

      Liberty is indeed the freedom to do as we please, as long as we abide by the law. It is not limited by "act as we aught," which necessarily implies some set of arbitrary extra-legal rules.

    5. Re:freedom of speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I suppose it's up to YOU to determine what WE "aught" to do? Guys like Romney and crocks like mormonism aught to be called out more often.

    6. Re:freedom of speech by Intropy · · Score: 1

      You got modded insightful for being intentionally obtuse. Now, because I just exercised my freedom of speech, you are obligated to like what I said. Similarly you must celebrate all gatherings of any kind, all religions, all news articles, and all handgun murders, being as they are, uses of a freedom. Oh, and lawyers. You have to celebrate lawyers. Bask in that.

    7. Re:freedom of speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing simple about your reasoning is the person writing the comment.

      Linus can say any stupid thing he wants, we agree.

      We can also call him an idiot, especially when the point of his criticism is incorrect. Romney was joking. Linus showed himself a fool.

      See? Everyone has exercised their freedom, and that freedom is not diminished.

      You fucking moron.

    8. Re:freedom of speech by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Quite the opposite: liberty is the freedom to do as we please, so long as we do not infringe on the equal liberty of others, which we ought (note spelling) not do. It is not limited by "act as the law says", which necessarily implies some set of arbitrary legal rules.

      To quote Jefferson:

      Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    9. Re:freedom of speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. You just got owned!

    10. Re:freedom of speech by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Ethics may be extralegal, but is it arbitrary?

    11. Re:freedom of speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:freedom of speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the tip.

      You are a fucking moron.

    13. Re:freedom of speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberty is indeed the freedom to do as we please, as long as we abide by the law.

      Uhm? What?

      Law is the method governments use to control it's people, it has nothing to do with freedom. North Koreans are free to do as they please as long as they abide by their law but I wouldn't call that liberty.

    14. Re:freedom of speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The law defines behaviour that society has decided is so unacceptable it will be punished. It does not mean that any act that is legal is also acceptable. I don't know of any law that says you should not lie - but generally people shouldn't.

      Your own personal liberty is only protected by other people acting as they aught to - when the majority of people stop acting as they aught to, they will start to limit the liberty of others. It is not illegal - in the USA, for example - to pass the patriot act, arrest people and detain them without charging them or giving them a trial. But really, you aught not to.

    15. Re:freedom of speech by cyborg_zx · · Score: 1

      I am tired from all the celebrating. Can't I just tut and ignore free speech I don't give a fuck about?

    16. Re:freedom of speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed the point. While you're perfectly free to say what he said it does demonstrate a lack of class. It's too bad that freedom of speech doesn't automatically come with the wisdom to choose what to say as well as what not to.

    17. Re:freedom of speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I applaud this post, bravo.

    18. Re:freedom of speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "as long as we abide by the law."?

      So liberty/freedom is a positive? Not negative?

    19. Re:freedom of speech by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Liberty is indeed the freedom to do as we please, as long as we abide by the law. It is not limited by "act as we aught," which necessarily implies some set of arbitrary extra-legal rules.

      That's "ought" not "aught" and the basic point of the laws we agree to and abide by is to define what we ought not to do.

      However, there will always be unpleasant but legal acts, that does not mean we have to celebrate them in any way at all. Burning books is probably legal, that does not mean I would ever applaud it.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    20. Re:freedom of speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that simple reasoning? It doesn't even make sense.

    21. Re:freedom of speech by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Then how come I never see people celebrating speech they disagree with? Where are the people who cheer on Rick Santorum's stance that gay relationships are equivalent to bestiality, or Michael Savage's comments that there needs to be a second Holocaust but this time on Muslims? Nobody is saying they don't have a right to speak, but we also have a responsibility to call people out on their abuse of it for nefarious ends.

    22. Re:freedom of speech by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      But at least I'm not a coward. :)

    23. Re:freedom of speech by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      Bask in it, motherfuckers.

      Americans always love to say how great freedom of speech is, but when I started making jokes about 9-11 they got all offended when I was there.

      Even if you try and make the serious point that is quite widely believed in some parts of the world that the US government knew 9-11 was going to happen and quite happily let it in order to get public support for a war on terror there are many people in the US who immediately want to resort to violence (in the punching your face in way). This is not exactly basking in freedom of speech is it?

      I was very happy to see the recent bunch of cartoons that came from Egypt taking the piss out of us back as that was at least a sign that some muslims are realising that the best way to counter distasteful jokes is to just fire some back in our direction. That helps us see things in a different light if we can at least see the hypocrisy in us defending the freedom to offend others while not recognising others right to offend us as well.

      In my experience we have a greater percentage of people with a sense of humour with regard to these things but I think that is just a symptom of our higher general levels of education.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
  11. he's not a leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    he's not a leader, he's a coder, bug difference

    and if their is one thing the OS community is, it's grassroots, no leader needed

    1. Re:he's not a leader by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      he's not a leader, he's a coder, bug difference

      Excellent typo, in the context of talking about coders.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:he's not a leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      leader.../...coder, bug difference

      Best.Misspelling.Ever.

      Yes, the difference between a leader and a coder *is* accurately described in quantity of bugs produced.

    3. Re:he's not a leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have thought the difference would be in the type of bug, coders produce bugs in their code, and politicians produce bugs in the legal system.

  12. Gool ol' Freedom of Speech by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    It's not just for people who want to run tabloids, nasty art, junk music and girly magazines.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Gool ol' Freedom of Speech by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Yep. It's also for people who make really poorly done videos that make fun of Mohammed.

      And batshit leaders who apologize for that freedom can foad.

  13. Good by BlindRobin · · Score: 2

    People should point out the [epmoror|candidates] lack of clothing.

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People should point out the [epmoror|candidates] lack of clothing.

      That's how we like them, because then we know if they're packing a knife or gun. We throw all the people sane enough to wear clothes out of the race before we even get halfway through the election battle, so that we have nice view of the flacid nakedness which will soon be spewing rhetoric, err I mean "leading the country... and the world!" in a few months.

  14. Ehh. by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Linus is entitled to his opinions no matter how correct they are. However, I would go further and say that the two party system is largely staffed by fucking corrupt morons, and that if you think they are different you are batshit crazy. The two parties are just two arms of the *same machine*. Thank you.

    1. Re:Ehh. by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1

      I second the motion.

    2. Re:Ehh. by jmottram08 · · Score: 1

      Except, you know, it isn't correct and Linus apologized the next day.

  15. errr... by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    Don't see how Torvalds expressing his personal opinion, and BTW mine as well should have any effect on Linux. Did he post it in the source code ? Did he preface the comment by as the admin for Linux ?

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  16. Or... by sacrilicious · · Score: 2

    Is this just Linus being Linus? Or does such outspokenness on non-technical matters reflect poorly on the Linux community that Torvalds leads?

    Or are the statements simply great and accurate?

    I'm not saying they are or aren't, but this option was conspicuously absent from the options listed for how readers are allowed to feel about it (which were "should this be ignored, or does it suck").

    Just sayin'.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  17. We survived Erik Raymond- we'll survive Linus by bird · · Score: 3, Funny

    EOM

    1. Re:We survived Erik Raymond- we'll survive Linus by bobaferret · · Score: 1

      and to note: We've survived Richarrd Stallman- we'll survive Linus. You have to admit though, that all three of them have done wonderful and amazing things for he world, so I'm willing to cut them some slack.

  18. Mitt Foggy by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 0

    It's hard to tell the difference these days between an outrageous Romney lie or a joke so I can see why he might take the windows on airplanes statement seriously.

  19. "Political Correctness" by Silas+is+back · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I admire Linus for daring to speak his mind, in the language he does speak his mind, as a person of public interest (or how you call it). More people should do that, it's honest and you quickly learn where you stand, not only after interpreting the words this or that way and weighing the options.

    --
    this sig is useless
    1. Re:"Political Correctness" by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      I admire Linus for daring to speak his mind, in the language he does speak his mind, as a person of public interest (or how you call it).

      I'd have more respect for him if he'd actually do that instead of bowing to silly superstitions like writing "bats**t"

    2. Re:"Political Correctness" by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well --- daring to speak your mind is admirable, provided you've thought through what you ought to say. Saying whatever pops into your head is just stupid.

      Now I'm a lifelong liberal Democrat and currently a strong Obama partisan, but I watched the remarks in question by Governor Romney before weighing in on them. After watching them several times my take is that Romney was making a joke, but he was so stiff it wasn't immediately apparent. He's not good at off the cuff remarks, and under the circumstances it's understandable that he wasn't comfortable.

      Now, when Romney was asked "Isn't it the government's responsibility to provide health care to the fifty million people who don't have it today?" he answered, "“Well, we do provide care for people who don’t have insurance. If someone has a heart attack, they don’t sit in their apartment and — and die. We pick them up in an ambulance, and take them to the hospital, and give them care." Now that was a f**cking moronic answer, and he deserves to be mocked for it.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:"Political Correctness" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I admire Linus for daring to speak his mind, in the language he does speak his mind, as a person of public interest (or how you call it). More people should do that, it's honest and you quickly learn where you stand, not only after interpreting the words this or that way and weighing the options.

      It's strange how technical ability seems not to prevent people from crass bigotry.

    4. Re:"Political Correctness" by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I admire Linus for daring to speak his mind, in the language he does speak his mind, as a person of public interest (or how you call it).

      I'd have more respect for him if he'd actually do that instead of bowing to silly superstitions like writing "bats**t"

      If writing "bats**t" instead of "batshit" means that the comment will get reported more widely, it is arguably a compromise worth making. It's not as though "bats**t" actually hides any of the meaning, is it?

      What is annoying is when swear words are just blanked/asterisked out completely.

      Reading that Mr A called Mr B "a ******* ****-brained ****-faced ****-monkey" leads to some ambiguity.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:"Political Correctness" by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      Now, when Romney was asked "Isn't it the government's responsibility to provide health care to the fifty million people who don't have it today?" he answered, "“Well, we do provide care for people who don’t have insurance. If someone has a heart attack, they don’t sit in their apartment and — and die. We pick them up in an ambulance, and take them to the hospital, and give them care." Now that was a f**cking moronic answer, and he deserves to be mocked for it.

      Why was that a moronic answer? I'm sure the reason is apparent but for the life of me I'm unable to see it...

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    6. Re:"Political Correctness" by hey! · · Score: 1

      Why was that a moronic answer? I'm sure the reason is apparent but for the life of me I'm unable to see it...

      Because waiting until you are critically ill and then going to the emergency room is the absolute worst way to treat a chronic condition like coronary artery disease. It's paying much, much more to get worse results to use the ER instead of screening and management of the disease through office visits.

      I could go on for pages for all the unnecessary financial and social costs of using the ER as the main delivery vehicle of health care, but it all boils down to the fact it's better AND cheaper to prevent emergencies than it is to fix them. We pay more per capita in this country for health care than any other country on earth, by a wide margin. While some of that medicine is very impressive, if you look at the statistics our outcomes are about the worst of all the advanced economies.

      39 countries in the world do a better job of preventing infant mortality (pre-natal care is prevention) ranking just behind Cuba, which pays $495 per person to our $7164, 12% of their GDP to our staggering **15.2%**. We're just behind Cuba in life expectancy too (they live 1/10 year longer than our 78.2 years). The country with the highest life expectancy is Japan which spend 72% less per person ($2817 per person per year or 8.3% of GDP) and people live to 82.7 years. Look next door to Canada, which does much better than us in infant mortality rate and where they live on average two and a half years longer than we do. Canadians spend about half as much per person on health care as we do and get better results.

      We might not want to make the same choices Canada does. Maybe we *do* want to spend twice as much on health care, but *we should get better outcomes as a result*. The fact that our outcomes are substantially *worse* means we're doing it in a profoundly stupid way (e.g. using the ER instead of a primary care physician).

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  20. Speaking of people being morons... by Xandrax · · Score: 5, Informative

    The problem is that the reporter that originally covered this (New York Times's Ashley Parker) has stated that Romney said it in the form of a joke and was not being serious. Seems like not being a moron is a fine line even for Linux creators.

    Ashley’s response to the question:

    The Los Angeles Times story that relayed Romney’s airplane remark to the world was based off a pool report written by the New York Times‘s Ashley Parker. When we asked Parker this morning whether it seemed as if Romney made the mark in jest, she left no doubt. “Romney was joking,” she e-mailed. Parker told us that while the pool report didn’t explicitly indicate that Romney was joking, it was self-evident that he was. ”The pool report provided the full transcript of his comments on Ann’s plane scare,” she said, “and it was clear from the context that he was not being serious.”

    1. Re:Speaking of people being morons... by KermodeBear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Doesn't matter now, damage has already been done. It's amazing how whenever the news media doesn't like a politician they will release half-truths, outright lies, and stuff taken out of context and plaster the world with it. Then a few days later a little snippet of, "Oh, we were bad, we're sorry, honest!"

      --
      Love sees no species.
    2. Re:Speaking of people being morons... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2

      Doesn't matter now, damage has already been done. It's amazing how whenever the news media doesn't like a politician they will release half-truths, outright lies, and stuff taken out of context and plaster the world with it. Then a few days later a little snippet of, "Oh, we were bad, we're sorry, honest!"

      What damage? In your own mind? Listen, the only people that see this as a problem had every intention of voting for Obama regardless of anything. You are a partisan.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    3. Re:Speaking of people being morons... by rossz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Interesting how some people can fully justify blatant media bias.

      Bias should bother you, whether it's a candidate you like or dislike, you should be comfortable knowing that the news your receive is honest. When you are accepting of what is an outright lie, you are allowing yourself to live in a fantasy world.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    4. Re:Speaking of people being morons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The post you responded to isn't justifying media bias; they are claiming (rightfully so) that NO damage was done because the people that responded to Romney's remark always had the intention of voting for Obama.

      It was another non-story. Those against Romney used it as justification for their predetermined vote and those for Romney used it as an opportunity to rail against the (left's) media bias. No decisions were made on that day; mind's have been made up in this country along a very fine line for a very long time and that saddens me more than media bias.

    5. Re:Speaking of people being morons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truth does not really matter for those who long for socialism. It is a form of insanity to expect four more years of this administration to obtain different economic results when it has stridently doubled-down on its failed strategy. Break out the Ouzo pals for we're all Greek now. But we get all sorts of socially progressive bon-bons to enjoy while our future and freedoms burn to a heap.

    6. Re:Speaking of people being morons... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Listen, the only people that see this as a problem had every intention of voting for Obama regardless of anything.

      Even if we grant your unfounded opinion, there is a huge difference between intention and action. Obama's biggest problem will be that the people who prefer him to Romney are more likely to sit out the election than vote. Even a baseless scare story can motivate them to go to the booth.

      Also, it'll waste a little of Romney's time and set back his message a bit. One time isn't going to do much. But having to spend a considerable portion of your time defusing dumb scare stories can set you back.

      And frankly, I think even in the sense you were referring to, dumb scare stories will stick to a fence-sitter.

      It's not the most effective of propaganda, but given that it is free, it's definitely worth the cost.

    7. Re:Speaking of people being morons... by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the reporter that originally covered this (New York Times's Ashley Parker) has stated that Romney said it in the form of a joke and was not being serious. Seems like not being a moron is a fine line even for Linux creators.

      Ashley’s response to the question:

      The Los Angeles Times story that relayed Romney’s airplane remark to the world was based off a pool report written by the New York Times‘s Ashley Parker. When we asked Parker this morning whether it seemed as if Romney made the mark in jest, she left no doubt. “Romney was joking,” she e-mailed. Parker told us that while the pool report didn’t explicitly indicate that Romney was joking, it was self-evident that he was. ”The pool report provided the full transcript of his comments on Ann’s plane scare,” she said, “and it was clear from the context that he was not being serious.”

      I'm no fan of Mitt's at all, even if I do tend to think he's marginally better to the opposition. That said, it is extremely annoying to have people of certain political bents jump all over the comment as if it were serious and then when it was forcefully pointed out that it was a joke more than half of them responded by dismissing that it was a joke and just saying the comment still proved he was an idiot.

      Linus did at least mention that he was wrong, which gives him some serious points for admitting he was wrong. More than I can say for most of the people who responded to the G+ thread in question.

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    8. Re:Speaking of people being morons... by c0lo · · Score: 1

      ...Parker told us that while the pool report didn't explicitly indicate that Romney was joking, it was self-evident that he was.

      Can't do nothing but to agree with the comments following Linus' apology:

      I think it's a version of Poe's law. It's hard to tell when Republicans are joking or serious about being scientifically illiterate.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    9. Re:Speaking of people being morons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eh what damage, he says. I don't know, let's start with Linus taking his cues from the report and believing it was serious. Oh, lets throw in the a good percentage of the previous poster here.

      what damage, he says....

      unbelievable.

    10. Re:Speaking of people being morons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teabagger, be gone!

    11. Re:Speaking of people being morons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what are your thoughts on "you didn't build that"? Let's see just how hypocritical you are.

    12. Re:Speaking of people being morons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeh its amazing what political pressure can do, its quite simple Romney's office contacted her boss made some threats then the boss went to Ashley Parker and told her that she must fix it or get fired.

      Now she is all the sudden a expert where not even in the video clip it is self-evident?

      Its amazing what some political pressure can do especially if you are a propaganda arm of the US government.

    13. Re:Speaking of people being morons... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      What bias? The media takes quotes from both candiates out of context to manufacture controversy and sell ads. The bias in our media isn't towards one candidate or the other, but towards the two party corporatist system in generaal.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    14. Re:Speaking of people being morons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter now, damage has already been done. It's amazing how whenever the news media doesn't like a politician they will release half-truths, utright lies, and stuff taken out of context and plaster the world with it. Then a few days later a little snippet of, "Oh, we were bad, we're sorry, honest!"

      I dunno about that... Fox News has made a business model of slandering and lying about Obama. And that's without any apologies ever.

    15. Re:Speaking of people being morons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting how some people can fully justify blatant media bias.

      Bias should bother you, whether it's a candidate you like or dislike, you should be comfortable knowing that the news your receive is honest. When you are accepting of what is an outright lie, you are allowing yourself to live in a fantasy world.

      I have never seen the American media bias as bad as it is right now. They have resorted from just lying to attacking the candidates and their families. And when presented with what appears to be facts, they then attack the presenter. Pretty fucking pathetic.

  21. Irrelevant Person A criticizes Irrelevant Person B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Irrelevant Person A criticizes Irrelevant Person B.

    How is this news?

  22. Leave Mitt-ney Alone!! by Oh+Gawwd+Peak+Oil · · Score: 1
  23. Repubs need to be shamed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    The Repubs lost the last election because they took a trip to crazy land. What's their strategy this year? Double down on the crazy and purge all remaining moderates.

    The republican party does not respond to rational arguments. All you have left to do is shame them. More people need to speak out. Linus is just saying what we're all thinking. That and, you know, he's comes a Scandinavian country which are typically very far left and "social". Romney's political message is pure lunacy to anyone from that part of Europe.

    Maybe if the Rs lose for six or seven consecutive terms they'll get a clue. Yes, I'm suggesting that you should vote against the republican party to save it. If you're a real conservative, you'll vote for someone else.

  24. What are you, twelve years old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Profanity? From "profane"? Is language sacred now? Even if you think so, are you so immature that someone else's use of language constitutes offensive speech? Grow up (or as he might say, grow the FUCK up).

    Captcha: mischief

  25. Ask Mark Twain about calling a thing by its name by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What a loaded question. "Does it reflect badly and cause of loss of reputation", what... that someone calls a batshit crazy religion batshit crazy? Didn't hurt Mark Twain's reputation much.

    http://www.salamandersociety.com/marktwain/

    So I guess the answer is no.

  26. ANYONE not using linux is a f***ing moron! Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've come to learn that just about anyone who doesn't have a technical mind and doesn't program or work with linux/unix is in geral a f***ing moron from one degree to another.

  27. Come on by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I had no clue in Romney's tone or anything else he was joking.

    It was obvious from his tone in the video (and from body language, and from his laughing while saying it) he was joking. The reporter who was actually there said he was joking. No rational person on earth thinks airplane windows should roll down.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Come on by Derekloffin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sorry, Republican... hell, politicians in general, no longer can be assumed to be rational persons.

    2. Re:Come on by oddfox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The guy laughs at the most inappropriate moments, a lot. Recalling a horrible cruel prank on a gay person back in college? Haha! Talking about a situation where his wife could have died? Haha! Talking about the Seamus-on-his-car-roof-in-a-kennel incident? Haha! Talking about your father closing a factory in Michigan and moving it to Wisconsin and there was a mishap with the band playing the wrong song? Haha! Romney's laughter isn't an indicator of sincerity. It's an indicator of extreme nervousness and discomfort meant to distract. And the sad thing is that it apprently works on people.

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
    3. Re:Come on by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was being sarcastic.

    4. Re:Come on by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      It was obvious from his tone in the video (and from body language, and from his laughing while saying it) he was joking.

      Can you provide a link to the video you watched?

      I've found two on youtube, but he was not laughing during the delivery and his body language looked as wooden as always. But both videos cut off pretty quickly after he says those words. If he paused for effect, gave a chuckle or even if the audience just chuckled, I'd totally agree it was a joke.

      But I can't seem to find a video with enough footage to tell one way or the other and without that, I'm left thinking it was more like his infamously inane comments about michigan and how he loves cars, lakes and how "the tree's are the right height."

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:Come on by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I watched the one on snopes, and I think the entire thing was a really poorly done bit (as much as I'd like to be able to believe he was serious).

      He chuckles in the lead-up, and his cadence in the lead up (from we were so worried...) is like the set-up to a punchline. As far as one (2 maybe) liners delivered by politicians, it's solidly average.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    6. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No "rational" person would accept, at face value, that the claim that "women's bodies reject sperm from a rapist".

      These politicians are set up to repeat certain claims that will help their argument. Akin didn't "accidentally" make up that medical "fact"; he brought it up knowing full well that it supported his argument. Of course, there is a small matter that it was patently false, but he did not bother to research the details because someone already planted that "fact" in his head, and that was good enough for him. That he would accept such "facts" without question simply because it supported his argument is fairly typical of politicians.

      I would have thought Romney is much smarter than that, but, in his case, I might be willing to apply the Akin explanation, and let him get away with "misspeaking". This is, at worst, a minor brain fart. He will not be in charge of federal aviation policy details, and the whole of FAA will face him down, even if he is the president, and he suggests something dumb ass like this; unlike Akin, who is on the House Science Committee, and can do a lot of long term damage if the Republicans were to take over the Senate.

    7. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was obvious it wouldn't be such a big deal, if he gets elected we have another George W. Bush on our hands. :)

    8. Re:Come on by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      No rational person on earth thinks airplane windows should roll down.

      Color me irrational

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    9. Re:Come on by Nilatir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Romney has crossed "Poe's Threshold", the point where it's no loner certain whether his statements are serious or facetious.

      --

      "We were half way to Rivendell when the drugs began to take hold."
      -- Hunter S. Tolkien
    10. Re:Come on by sjames · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How many rational people strap the dog kennel to the roof of the car?

    11. Re:Come on by khallow · · Score: 0
      So, what's the point of the amateur pop psychology? In this case, we have a joke and laughing. While I'm sure psychologically, that says something rather obvious about Romney, I also find I'm out of give a shit.

      And the sad thing is that it apprently works on people.

      What's "sad" about that? Laughter is not only a way for a stressed person to relax and compose themselves, it also is a lot more appealing to watch than squirming. What you are saying (whether you realize it or not) is that Romney has turned a human weakness into something of an asset. Imagine that. I would reward such effort with respect rather than obsess over small flaws.

    12. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than eat the dog instead?

    13. Re:Come on by formfeed · · Score: 1

      How many rational people strap the dog kennel to the roof of the car?

      Mythbusters would do it.

    14. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you Mean Edgar Allen, or Arthur Poe? and if neither, who? good name for this phenomenon, but ive never heard it used.

    15. Re:Come on by sjames · · Score: 1

      Actually, I doubt they would.

    16. Re:Come on by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      I think pretty much the whole GOP candidate list was close to that. Watching Herman Cain doing joint projects with Steven Colbert and humor segments on the daily show http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M25fBW5BA88 Considering he was formerly a frontrunner in the GOP competition, and honestly he doesn't sound too much different when he's acting purely for humor.

    17. Re:Come on by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      How many rational people strap the dog kennel to the roof of the car?

      I am sure that lots of rational people do. As for rational people who strap the kennel to the roof of the car and then drive with the dog in the kennel -- that is a different and more important question!

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    18. Re:Come on by Livius · · Score: 1

      Possibly quite a lot, assuming they had paid for the kind of kennel which is specially designed to travel on the roof of a car.

    19. Re:Come on by sjames · · Score: 1

      And that would be what? Never heard of such a thing. It's actually illegal in Massachusetts.

    20. Re:Come on by compro01 · · Score: 1

      He's referring to Poe's Law, named after Nathan Poe, an agnostic poster on christianforums.com.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    21. Re:Come on by Evtim · · Score: 1

      "What's "sad" about that?"

      The Joker also laughs a lot, doesn't he?

      When are we going to grow up and actually concentrate on the message instead of the manner of delivery? Gosh, sorry to say it, but seeing how people react on politics and politicians I cannot restrain myself from stating that 90% of the population is composed of morons. Not necessarily stupid in other walks of life, but stupid as hell when it comes to politics...must be all those cognitive biases to which we are all susceptible. Why are we so fucked by our evolutionary path; what a bad luck!

    22. Re:Come on by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Gosh

      Apparently Mitt's rubbed off on you.

    23. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clarke's law about republicans: Any sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from joking.

    24. Re:Come on by DRMShill · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you haven't met a lot of Mormons. They're not exactly an exuberant people. Their services almost seem like funerals. If they feel like they're out of their element, random haha's tend to pop up.

    25. Re:Come on by BorgDrone · · Score: 1

      No rational person on earth thinks airplane windows should roll down.

      The guy wears magical underpants...

    26. Re:Come on by Xest · · Score: 1

      Just watched it for myself, and as someone who isn't from the US nor particularly cares which one wins because at this point American politics is such a fucking trainwreck that it makes no odds to us in the rest of the world, I'd say whilst his tone seems generally light hearted his comment on why windows don't open clearly wasn't part of that, it makes no sense in the context of his light hearted delivery of the situation as a joke and only as a genuine question slipped in as an aside to the situation he was talking about.

      It seems he genuinely didn't understand why they don't roll down.

    27. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The 'sad part' is you're still missing the point! He's not laughing cause it was a joke and he finds it funny - he's laughing cause he was caught out saying something amazingly stupid - opening his trap without engaging his brain - yet again, and instead of having the decency to be ashamed or bashful for the appalling or stupid things he just said, he laughs to distract peoples attention and it make it seem like he meant it as a joke.

      The 'really fucking sad part' is the previous poster explained that to you and you claimed to understand and still tried to spin in into a good thing!

      Lets make a it really simple - he says stupid things, then weasels out of the shame without actually refuting the stupid/horrible thing he said. Try spinning that again please?

    28. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many rational people EAT the dog ?

    29. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jokes are often told during tragic times by people, not because they are insensitive, mean, uninformed, or whatever, but because it allows the discussion to continue in a light hearted way, a reflective way, a removal of the feelings that accompany a disaster, while still reflecting on the seriousness of it. You are one of the people that don't get it. Joking allows you to focus more clearly without the "nervousness and discomfort" you proclaim you want to avoid. It's already there. A joke diffuses the situation, a pressure valve if you will.

      I can see you are one of the assholes that runs around like a chicken with it's head cut off anytime something happens, from minor to major. You are one of the people that take everything too seriously and you feel that if anyone is not running around like you, they aren't taking it seriously. "Well if you can't take this seriously, then maybe you should leave." type of attitude.

      The fact is people like you who can't joke and don't like jokes, don't have any mechanisms to deal with stress in a productive way. Joking is one method. Being wound up like yourself only exacerbates problems in your life, work, and around the world. Have you watched the news lately, those are people like you. Wound up tight, near the edge of breaking, waiting for something to light their fuse. So you don't like the joke method of diffusing a situation, fine, find another method. In reality until you do, the joke's on you.

    30. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many mouth-breathers that would vote for him leave the kennel loose in the open bed of a pickup truck so it can slide about?

      I'm less concern about how he treated his dog than I am about how he'll treat non-Religious people in this Country. Or how he'll treat non-Citizens that are in this Country.

    31. Re:Come on by khallow · · Score: 1

      The 'sad part' is you're still missing the point! He's not laughing cause it was a joke and he finds it funny - he's laughing cause he was caught out saying something amazingly stupid - opening his trap without engaging his brain - yet again, and instead of having the decency to be ashamed or bashful for the appalling or stupid things he just said, he laughs to distract peoples attention and it make it seem like he meant it as a joke.

      Out of curiosity, do you really believe the above garbage? It looked like a joke to me. As has been already noted, the people at the press thing thought he was joking. I'm willing to take their side especially over an idiot on the internet with an ax to grind.

      The 'really fucking sad part' is the previous poster explained that to you and you claimed to understand and still tried to spin in into a good thing!

      This was a case of noblesse oblige. I couldn't just let that poor poster continue their life in darkness without at least a little illumination.

      Lets make a it really simple - he says stupid things, then weasels out of the shame without actually refuting the stupid/horrible thing he said. Try spinning that again please?

      As you wish. We all say and do stupid stuff on occasion. You just did in the post above, for example, though due to other reasons than merely putting your foot in your mouth. What separates the better communicators in such cases, is that a) they recognize the error as they say it, and b) have come up with tricks for mitigating the effects of the gaff, such as Romney's alleged nervous chuckling.

      If the trick works as you allege it did in this cause, then what's the big deal? Romney occasionally saying dumb stuff? Everyone does. Romney making it appear as a joke? Well, he's a politician and that's a good skill for one to have. Maybe you should figure out a similar trick for when you do that.

      Finally, there's no reason for shame here. Anyone who has to talk a lot will make mistakes. And for a president those mistakes will often be broadcast worldwide. They'll have no time to beat themselves because they flubbed the delivery of their latest airplane joke. Better that they chuckle and move on.

    32. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why shouldn't airplane windows roll down?
      I have no idea what kind of airplane his wife was in, or at what altitude it was flying,
      but my uncle's airplanes all have windows that open. They stay open for most of the flight.

    33. Re:Come on by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      >Actually, I doubt they would.

      I'm sure they WOULD find a reason to do it.
      What they would NOT do is strap the kennel to the roof of the car WITH THE DOG STILL INSIDE IT !

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    34. Re:Come on by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Maybe he really is a robot. That seems like something a robot would do right?

      "CAGE ITEM SECURED TO ROOF OF VEHICLE, INITIATE TRANSPORT. OBJECTIVE COMPLETED. UPDATED OBJECTIVES LIST: 1 - DRIVE TO ONTARIO. 2 - SIMULATE FAMILY ENJOYMENT. 3 - ACQUIRE CURRENCY."

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    35. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had no clue in Romney's tone or anything else he was joking.

      It was obvious from his tone in the video (and from body language, and from his laughing while saying it) he was joking. The reporter who was actually there said he was joking. No rational person on earth thinks airplane windows should roll down.

      But... It gets so stuffy if you cannot ventalite form the windows.
      Yours sincerily,
      Oliver North

    36. Re:Come on by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      No rational person on earth thinks airplane windows should roll down.

      And you fail to see the obvious conclusion to be drawn from this statement and the fact that Romeny thinks that airplane windows should roll down?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    37. Re:Come on by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I was being sarcastic.

      Oops, it was too subtle for me at least. Apologies, I'll go and throw myself out of an open plane window.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    38. Re:Come on by sjames · · Score: 1

      We're all invited to take a trip with the Romneys for the next 4 years. Some of us will be crossing our legs hoping he stops for th bathroom soon, and some of us will be strapped to the roof. If we get sick, we'll be hosed.

    39. Re:Come on by Straif · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's like when he gives 'shout out's before holding a press conference after a national tragedy, oh wait, that was the other guy.

      --
      Of course that's just my opinion...... you could be wrong!
    40. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Romney's laughter isn't an indicator of sincerity. It's an indicator of extreme nervousness and discomfort meant to distract. And the sad thing is that it apparently works on people.

      Hmm, here all along I was thinking he was actually a space alien.

    41. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was being sarcastic.

      Don't you have a sarcasm sign?

    42. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still trying to figure out why people think this is a big deal. If you had a dog who had diarrhea, you would do the exact same thing I'm sure. Even if the dog wasn't sick, if the weather was fine, then there's no reason not to do this. I agree that most people wouldn't, but it's not like it hurts the dog in any way.

      I guess I'll just have to assume people who bring this up are either ohmygodIloveanimals people or blue blood Democrat cranks.

    43. Re:Come on by sjames · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so what if the dog shits himself in panic?

      It was actually illegal when he did it as well.

    44. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends ... rational people would strap an empty dog kennel to the roof of a car.

    45. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are saying he is ready for the presidency then.

    46. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No rational person who knows the origins of Mormonism would take it seriously as a religion. Romney is a Mormon, therefore he is not rational.

    47. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, Republican... hell, politicians in general, no longer can be assumed to be rational persons.

      As long as you keep thinking that way, the people who want to you to keep thinking that way have won! Because the crazies, the fascists, the airheaded, the immoral and the evil bastards who like power for its own sake, well those folks' supporters ALWAYS show up to vote.

    48. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the really clever sadists, but almost none of the smarter and politically ambitious people.

    49. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people laugh as a stress response.

    50. Re:Come on by atamido · · Score: 1

      How many rational people strap the dog kennel to the roof of the car?

      I think that would depend heavily on how many people's dogs like traveling in that fashion.

    51. Re:Come on by sjames · · Score: 1

      Hint, if the dog panics and shits himself (and the car), he doesn't like it. If the trip lasts 12 hours, he probably won't like it.

    52. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends very much on whether the cabin is pressurized. I've been in 2 C-172's, one where the windows rolled down with a hand crank, like old cars, and one where they only cracked open with latches. The hand cranks were much better.

    53. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many rational people strap the dog kennel to the roof of the car?

      Well I don't and wouldn't.. but I'm not entirely certain I am rational.

  28. idiotic politically correct fears indeed by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I do agree with him in this sense: you shouldn't need to censor your personal thoughts just for political correctness. Or even "professionalism", as TFA asks for. Even if you're someone of popularity. It shouldn't reflect at all on the Linux community, in the same way Reiser FS didn't become complete shit after Hans' better judgement slipped away from him.

    Could he have used more mature words? Sure. But does anyone really care?

    1. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But does anyone really care?

      I would venture a guess the 15+ million Mormons worldwide do. The fact that the Mormon religion is heavily invested in business (right or wrong considering their status as a religion), I would guess it wasn't Linus' brightest moment--apology or not.

    2. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by shentino · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bright or not, that would be caving to alleged mormon influence, as in "don't piss us off or we will hurt you"

      Which smacks of intimidation.

    3. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by frosty_tsm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bright or not, that would be caving to alleged mormon influence, as in "don't piss us off or we will hurt you"

      Which smacks of intimidation.

      What are they going to do, make all of their business investments run Windows servers?

    4. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by niftydude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you shouldn't need to censor your personal thoughts just for political correctness. Or even "professionalism", as TFA asks for. Even if you're someone of popularity. It shouldn't reflect at all on the Linux community

      Exactly. On top of this - every actor, actress, musician on the planet is allowed to voice their opinion on politics, religion, etc - but if a technical guy such as Linus does, it is unprofessional?

      And just for the record - Mormonism is batshit crazy. It takes an unprecedented level of double-think to believe Joseph Smith's story about the golden plates that no-one ever saw, and his excuses for why he couldn't translate the same transcript the same way twice.

      Linus shouldn't need to apologise for a statement that is objectively and obviously correct.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    5. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know what he said about Mormonism, but I don't think that should matter either in terms of Linux. If Mormons can't see past one dev, can't see that Linus is just one cog in a very large machine, that's their problem and not his. There will always be political things for some people to worry about, but traditionally devs are more about solving problems than massaging peoples' egos. It's not really that surprising that he's blunt and outspoken.

      And why is religion special from anything else, in that it becomes poor form to criticize one after it graduates from being a cult?

    6. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What are they going to do, make all of their business investments run Windows servers?

      One can hope. Then, when times get tough, we don't have to worry about fighting entrenched Mormons, with a year's stored food in their bunkers...

    7. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If they have a problem with being called batshit crazy, then they should stop acting batshit crazy. Do you expect me to just ignore all the crazy stuff? Should I just ignore the fact that the homeless guy on the corner yells at the stop sign and make him the CFO of my company anyway?

    8. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by ceoyoyo · · Score: 0

      The worst religion is one that gets bent out if shape when it's criticized. If Linus thinks worshipping a magic rock is crazy then Mormons are free to think Linus is crazy (or damned to eternal torture) for not doing so.

    9. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by SolitaryMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you ever heard somebody saying things like "people are fucking stupid", "people are morons", etc.?

      Do you really think 7B people get upset over this or even care?

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    10. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it shouldn't, but look at what happens when people conflate "open source software" with Richard Stallman...

    11. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would venture a guess the 15+ million Mormons worldwide do.

      Aren't they too busy being "bats**t crazy" to care about what Torvalds says?

      Though I admit, getting my very own planet in the afterlife is a pretty tempting proposition.

      [I know too many really good and decent devout people to absolutely discount religious beliefs, and the big ones are based upon centuries, if not millennia of tradition. So I have something of a grandfather-clause when it comes to ridiculing religion. If your religion was created after the development of the steam engine, you're a crackpot. If your religion pre-dates the steam engine, I'm careful not to insult your beliefs. I'm considering pushing it back to Newton, but for now, the steam engine is the cutoff.

      I know it's kind of arbitrary, but I've found it to be a very reliable rule-of-thumb. ]

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    12. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have Mormons and the Jews confused. HTH.

      Besides, of those Mormons who make business decisions on computing isues, I'd wager that a single-digit percentage knows that Linux came from Linus Torvalds, and not some guy wearing a red hat.

    13. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now we know Linus is a bigot. Knowing that, his remarks are 100% understandable.

    14. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Try saying Muhammad is fucking stupid in the Middle East

    15. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Seeteufel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The other aspect is his European origin. Politicians like Romney would not be capable of giving satisfaction over here. They are simply too far off. The reason for this is that Republicans are not conservatives in the European sense. Mormonism is quite crazy as a religious belief though their believers seem to be very nice personalities.

    16. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by jader3rd · · Score: 0

      the golden plates that no-one ever saw

      Multiple other people saw the golden plates and wrote testimonies to that affect. The two groups are known as the three and eight witnesses.

    17. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So not doing business with a company because you don't like their political leanings is now intimidation?
       
      Get the fuck over yourself.

    18. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Ghaoth · · Score: 2

      The world abounds with crazy. L. Ron Hubbard + Crazy = Scientology Although I have a suspicion that Scientology is Hubbard's joke on the world. Happy people.

      --
      Nos Morituri te salutamus
    19. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, UnixWare servers.

    20. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      You have the freedom of speech. However there are often consequences for your speech.
      Sometimes it is better for your image if you keep your mouth shut. Open Source often caries a political clout that for the most part you want to be considered apolitical. If you are a popular figure political statements often make it seem your movement has a larger hidden agenda.

      Hans is a bad example because he wasn't much of a key figure. Just a vocal supporter and his actions were not tied to his work.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    21. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it becomes poor form to criticize one after it graduates from being a cult?

      Whither does one graduate from being a cult?

    22. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by unimacs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Words matter. It's entirely possible to be honest without being crass. Tactful expression of one's opinions is far more effective.

      Does it reflect poorly on the linux community? Don't know about that one. Anybody that's even aware that a linux community exists is probably far more interested in technology than Linus's opinions of various politicians. On the other hand I can't think of a single way it could reflect well on the community.

    23. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personal thoughts aren't personal once they are outside of your head. Then it is speech. It should be protected, he should be able to say it.

      It does reflect poorly on him, making him look intolerant of others beliefs, but he should be able to say it.

    24. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      oh yeah, so I and another 11 people tell you we saw Michael Jackson pissing from above a pink cloud the other day, the fact that I'm not alone in the bullshit makes me credible? give me a fucking break will ya

    25. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Omeganon · · Score: 1

      The OSS movement shouldn't care about what other people think. Software is created and put out in the wild in the hope that others will benefit. Whether a particular class of people use it or not is typically irrelevant (unless they are the target of the software). The only people who are likely to greatly care about this are the people trying to make money off of open source software.

      --
      Omeganon
    26. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by mclaincausey · · Score: 1

      Oh come on. "We won't use Linux" as a policy by Mormon-owned business affects Linus exactly how? OT, big Dead fan, saw the garcia and Lazy Lightning URL (which happens to be in my area, the TC), big ups to you sir.

      --
      (%i1) factor(777353);
      (%o1) 777353
    27. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by DrJimbo · · Score: 1

      Hilarious and understated. Wish I had mod points for you.

      --
      We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
      -- Anais Nin
    28. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by sumdumass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's funny. Linus is constantly paraded as the voice of Linux, the father of Linux, the kernel maintainer of Linux he is in essence a default spokesman of Linux. Then when he appears to run off the deep end, people want to act like he is an insignificant player with no influence at all.

      The problem with language like this and actions like this isn't that they were done. It is that the profile of the person doing it. Ask yourself, why is it a problem that Chik Fil-A supports organizations that appose gay marriage? Now if it was just people working for the company donating to those organizations and not the head of the company, would it be the same issues? Like it or not, Linus is seen as the voice of Linux mainstream and he is now in Mr Cathy's shoes where doing and saying things can carry consequences outside of someone ignoring you or thinking you are just another bigot.

      And why is religion special from anything else, in that it becomes poor form to criticize one after it graduates from being a cult?

      There is an old saying, there is the truth and there is being mean.

      Regardless of how people want to claim they are trying to be, when they criticize others for the sake of doing so, they are purposely being mean. Some claim this is "keeping it real" and I've seen some of those people break down in tears trying to start physical fights with others when it is turned back around on themselves.

      So why is it that some people feel they can criticize anyone they want but no one can criticize them? This entire debate is about that. It is essentially, so what if he said something I agree with that hurt someone else' feelings. That's no reason to say something that hurts his feelings.

    29. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Stormthirst · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You don't hang around with many Christians do you

    30. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by jrumney · · Score: 2

      They could get one of their companies to claim license fees for Linux installations - I'm sure they've got some copyrights or patents somewhere that could be dubiously applied to Linux. Lawyers would be falling over themselves to take that case all the way to the end for a share of the massive profits they'd get when the case was over. I'm surprised noone has tried this foolproof plan yet.

    31. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Hans is a bad example because he wasn't much of a key figure. Just a vocal supporter and his actions were not tied to his work.

      Hans is also a bad example because he was removed from the post and locked up in jail. There was no question about his continued influence on the project. Linus on the other hand, will remain a prominent figure in Linux.

    32. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Brad1138 · · Score: 0

      Aren't they too busy being "bats**t crazy" to care about what Torvalds says?

      I know one family of Mormons and I have to agree, for the most part, they are batshit crazy. End of world, gun loving, extreme right wing, Obama is the Antichrist etc... crazy.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    33. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a basic understanding of the culture of 19th century New England is all that is required to recognize the absurdity of the LDS religion. The Book of Mormon is a work of fiction, mostly plagiarized from the KJV bible and severely influenced by superstitions and incorrect assumptions regarding the origins of the peoples of South America widely held by a great many of people living in the area at the time. If it weren't for Brigham Young's strong-arming during the succession crisis that followed Smith's death, the LDS church would be but a footnote in the annals of American history.

    34. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Three Witnesses never actually saw the golden plates - they claimed to have seen them in a vision but never actually saw them. Regarding the Eight Witnesses, they felt and held what they were told were golden plates, but never saw the plates themselves.

      "But they never recanted their testimonies afterwards..."

      Would you rather withhold your confession and have people believe you are a liar or would you confess being a liar and eliminate all doubt?

    35. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Joseph Smith also married the wife of Orson Hyde while Hyde was away serving a mission in Jerusalem/Palestine. While Orson and Nancy Hyde divorced later in life, THEY WERE MARRIED when Smith supposedly received a revelation from God that they should be married, despite Nancy Hyde already being married to Orson Hyde.

      The events I'm referring to are colloquially known as "history" and you should try reading some before repeating the same nonsense you've been told since you were a kid. Do some research and you'll discover the exact same things I discovered. IT SUCKS. I was devastated. I eventually got over the fact that the people who lied to me were well-meaning and didn't realize they were lied to as well.

      Uncle Joe was a con-man, a swindler, and a womanizer and he documented such in his own journals. Read the Joseph Smith Papers, volumes 1 and 2. Prepare to have your faith shattered, my friend. He documented his own exploits and still people believe the nonsense, it's absolutely incredible.

    36. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      "Muhammad is fucking stupid in the Middle East."

      Ahh, that feels better.

      3x fast...

      "Muhammad is fucking stupid in the Middle East. Muhammad is fucking stupid in the Middle East. Muhammad is fucking stupid in the Middle East."

    37. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Alien+Being · · Score: 4, Funny

      BTW, Mr. Stupid is getting rather annoyed and wishes that Muhammad would stop fucking him.

    38. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by puto · · Score: 0

      Wow you do not know the history of computers. When Wordperfect was tanking the mormon church made Novell buy them. I still have a CD that says "Novell Word Perfect". I worked for an ISP called Verio, now owned by NTT, and the majority of our servers in Orem Utah, the church gave us hell because of internet porn, so we got the hell outta dodge.

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    39. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Mormonism is batsh*t crazy" is an opinion and you are entitled to it. But if you want an audience, prove it. You can't prove it anymore than they can prove it's true. As for your references you need to do better as the book has sworn witnesses of the plates by members of their church and many of those members even left their church yet never recanted their testimony of witnessing the golden plates. As for the translation comment, the actual record of the event states that the original translated material was altered to make the re-translation appear fake. The re-translation was not released; not unable to translate.
      Linus doesn't need to apologize for his opinion he's entitled to it. I would expect a real critic or analytic to be more objective and open-minded to different ideas. After all, I can remember when the Open-source model was a cancer, toy, etc.

       

    40. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Miss+Emily+Litella · · Score: 0

      I'll see your golden plates and raise you a holy grail.

    41. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      What about people who worship the invention of the steam engine?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    42. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Don't forget the Masons. He kiped a lot ritual and other material from the Masons.

      I always thought it was a shame Mormonism didn't come a century later, because then it would have had UFOs, too.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    43. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Novell on the desktop!

      Novell's headquarters are in Salt Lake City. Probably mostly Mormon employees. They would be supporting their own then.

      Actually, it is freaky how much in that city (hell the whole state) is owned by the Mormon church (wouldn't be surprised if they had an interest in Novell even). Hotels, banks, etc. Mormon church is famous for keeping track of _everybody_. Promised myself, if I ever visited there again, to carry a huge wad of cash, never use plastic, and stay in some big chain hotel.

    44. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would *love* it if "muhammad has gay sex with retards" were to go viral...

    45. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you really fear for your life by criticizing Jesus Christ in a Christian nation then you're either crazy or have never been to one.

    46. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then tell Mr. Stupid to stop bending over naked in front of him!

    47. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by drkim · · Score: 1

      AH-LA-LA-LA-LA-LA-LA *KA-BOOM!!!*

      Dude. That is SO my next sig...

      (lowercase text added to bypass filter error. lowercase text added to bypass filter error. lowercase text added to bypass filter error. lowercase text added to bypass filter error. lowercase text added to bypass filter error. lowercase text added to bypass filter error. lowercase text added to bypass filter error. lowercase text added to bypass filter error.)

    48. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I have a suspicion that Scientology is Hubbard's joke on the world.

      I've heard that when Hubbard first heard that churches are tax exempt, he started his own as a tax dodge.
      Being a bad Sci-Fi writer he made up an appropriate bad "Sci-Fi religion," and the rest is history.

    49. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Darl McBride? Nice?

    50. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Frankie70 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It takes an unprecedented level of double-think to believe Joseph Smith's story about the golden plates that no-one ever saw, and his excuses for why he couldn't translate the same transcript the same way twice.

      Does it take more double think than that required for someone dying on Friday and coming back on Sunday?

    51. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by simplexion · · Score: 1

      All religions are bat shit crazy.

    52. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      I would venture a guess that most Mormons don't give a fuck, just like the vast majority of the human race doesnt give a fuck about Linus, let alone know who he is. Does Linus' opinion have any impact on them and their lives? What possible reason could they have to care at all? "Oh no, some geek who is completely irrelevant to anyone but other geeks thinks we're crazy!"

      The only people who care about this kind of shit are people who have an agenda to push and will use any pretext to do so, or the people who are, in fact, batshit crazy.

      People seem to be trying really hard to be offended by this stuff and completely ignoring the fact that there are very powerful people who unfortunately can have a direct impact on our lives, who say incredibly stupid and evil shit all the time. See: pretty much all the extreme right candidates currently running for office in the US.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    53. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Esteanil · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I was just thinking of starting a religion involving the steam engine and the patent issues surrounding it.
      "We could've had a better steam engine 15 years earlier!" is our cry of faith.

      --
      I'm a dreamer, the world is my playpen. But hey, I'm a serious person, I can't dream all the time.
    54. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      If 12 people with a degree in separation claim they saw that or anything else no matter how incredible it sound, then it is credible that something happened to make you all think you saw it. Usually, this is enough to convict someone of a crime as far as evidence goes- no matter how outlandish your claim might be.

      I'm not sure why that seems like such a shock to you. But it is the way the world works.

    55. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Esteanil · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I was just thinking of starting a religion involving the steam engine and the patent issues surrounding it.
      "We could've had a better steam engine 15 years earlier!" is our cry of faith.

      Although that would postdate the steam engine, and by GGP's standard make me a crackpot. Damn. I knew there was something wrong with this idea.

      --
      I'm a dreamer, the world is my playpen. But hey, I'm a serious person, I can't dream all the time.
    56. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Esteanil · · Score: 1

      First comment in a while to make me actually laugh out loud. Good job :-)

      --
      I'm a dreamer, the world is my playpen. But hey, I'm a serious person, I can't dream all the time.
    57. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by niftydude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does it take more double think than that required for someone dying on Friday and coming back on Sunday?

      Well Mormonism includes all the christian/catholic double think, and then adds the extra levels of Joseph Smith double think. So by definition I guess that it requires more .

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    58. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the religion was "created" (by someone rather than being self evident or a natural phenomenon), per se, then doesn't that rather negate any pretense to rationality and credibility in the first place?

      Just saying ....

    59. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by GeekBoy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      On behalf of all Mormons, you guys are making a far bigger deal out of it than we are. I read it and just went... meh.. it's Linus being Linus.

      I think we can handle' Linus' opinion after. oh, having the US Gov't try to exterminate us and being the target of 'Christian' hate, I mean Love, for a couple hundred years that resulting in smear campaigns, regular protests in front of our places of worship, tar and feathering, burning down our homes, raping our women and killing our children and murdering our leaders....

      Linus, no problem. I'll take Linus' love over 'Christian' love any day.

    60. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, those are called Red-Necks. It wouldn't matter if they were mormon or not. In fact if they were baptists they'd probably be burning crosses in the front yard and hanging residents of the ghetto down the street. Not *those people* are batshit crazy.

    61. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thank God, someone get's it.

      And as one of those Mormon's I'm fucking tired of people talking about us as if we are all the same (hello! Canadian, political centrist/libertarian, supports gay marriage, Linux advocate and Evolutionist.). We're people, not that different from anyone else, with the exception that we are more likely to nice-neighbour you to death than blow you the fuck up.

      If you're looking for the right wing automaton clones I suggest you go to your neighbourhood pentacostal church.
      If you're looking for your left wing automaton clones I suggest you go to your local university's next atheist rally.

    62. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      Hey, every group has some people that they'd like to get rid of.

    63. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by shadowofwind · · Score: 2

      And why is religion special from anything else, in that it becomes poor form to criticize one after it graduates from being a cult?

      Because people suck up to power. Hail ants.

    64. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find this offensive.

      Death to you and your nation.

    65. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      Wait, what?

      You seem to be implying that the mere allegation of possible business push-back "smacks of intimidation". Can't you wait to see if there is any before impugning people?

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    66. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your religion was created after the development of the steam engine, you're a crackpot. If your religion pre-dates the steam engine, I'm careful not to insult your beliefs.

      Fuck you. No one takes ancient greek mythology seriously, nor the Norse gods. Are you careful not te insult MY ancient belief that all religions are bullishit? Yes, there've been "Heretics" as long as there's been religions. My religion is of non-religion. Fucking Respect It Fool! Not Believing In Bullshit has been around since BEFORE RELIGION.

    67. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      Which magic rock would this be? The only object of worship in the theology is the Godhead (Father, Son, Holy Ghost). If there are any Mormons worshiping holy rocks, I don't know them.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    68. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      It takes an unprecedented level of double-think to believe Joseph Smith's story about the golden plates that no-one ever saw, ...

      By no means do you need to believe it, and you can go ahead and call it double-think if you like.

      You should be aware, however, that 11 other men claimed to have seen the plates. That's not no-one.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    69. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      Mormonism is [reputed to be] quite crazy as a religious belief though their believers seem to be very nice personalities.

      FTFY ;-)

      No, seriously. Many people find religious belief in general to be bizarre, but Mormonism is no more-so than most. What Mormonism has more of are "quite crazy" rumors, half grounded in truth (or less).

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    70. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by gl4ss · · Score: 1, Troll

      but mormonism is batshit crazy, even more so than the catholic version.

      and romney is an idiot dick, so why not call him a dick? from the latest it seems they got a deal with democrats to keep obama in for another 4 years - he's leaking so much shit.

      the difference between romney and linus is that linus isn't a presidential candidate NOR a commercial ceo. good for him! at least he isn't reading the source from golden plates.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    71. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Torvac · · Score: 1

      bat shit crazy and dangerous.

    72. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Ch_Omega · · Score: 1

      "If your religion was created after the development of the steam engine, you're a crackpot. If your religion pre-dates the steam engine, I'm careful not to insult your beliefs. I'm considering pushing it back to Newton, but for now, the steam engine is the cutoff."

      So any religion created after the first century BC gets the harsh treatment?

    73. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by J+Story · · Score: 1

      On top of this - every actor, actress, musician on the planet is allowed to voice their opinion on politics, religion, etc - but if a technical guy such as Linus does, it is unprofessional?

      It is true that every actor, etc., *is* allowed to voice their opinion, but it is also true that their opinions often show them to be uninformed children. Torvalds' intolerance has diminished him.

    74. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by bmcage · · Score: 1

      Probably referrring to Mekka

    75. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by shentino · · Score: 1

      I'm saying that if business pushed back because someone pissed off the mormons, that would be intimidation.

      The "don't piss us off or we will hurt you" bit that peple are afraid the mormons would bring to bear.

    76. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by shentino · · Score: 1

      No, but using religious influence to pressure a business is.

    77. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      WP
      "The history of the steam engine stretches back as far as the first century AD; the first recorded rudimentary steam engine being the aeolipile described by Greek mathematician Hero of Alexandria.[3]"

      Since Jesus was voted as a god only 2 centuries later, I guess you used a bad example.

    78. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by shentino · · Score: 1

      I would rather be a Mormon than a Scientologist, then.

    79. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Try saying "Nascar Sucks" in redneck country. See what happens.

      --
      No sig today...
    80. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck MoHAMmed with a horny rabid boar. I spit upon Mohammed. I pee in the Koran. Mohammed and islam is ridulous tripe. Why did Mohammed cross the road? To rape a camel, small dog and little girl, not neccessarily in that order. Haha!

      Mohammed has shit for brains
      Mohammed is a pig fucker. Mojammed likes porking pork.

      Look, here's Mohammed sulking
      ©--
      Eat shit, mohammed. Throw pictures of mohammed into buckets of pig shit.
      Ha haha

    81. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I think it would be more correct to call it "the last century BC"

    82. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by KeensMustard · · Score: 1

      I assume you include your own religion in that judgement

    83. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Seeteufel · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The Nationalist Socialist party, movement I must say, was a revolutionary nationalist movement with a mythological re-foundation of the national idea based on blood and soil, a leader cult and expansionary foreign policies. Racism of the National Socialists followed a hygienics concept. It wasn't "conservative", like the Center Party or the DVP, or even the restaurative DNVP which all stood for a pluralist civil society and traditions.

      I agree with your analysis that the fragmentation of US national solidarity for health insurance etc. is founded on sublime racism. It is a quite Straussian perspective but I think it applies.

      In Europe freaky aggressive policy communication is usually the business of the "progressive" left and the right fringe. Conservatives are conservative, that is they restrain themselves. They don't engage in negative campaigning. You could say, conservatism is policy making for grandpas, not disgruntled haters. Europe is multicultural but equally struggles to create cohesion. But we see the emergence of right wing populist parties like FPÖ in Austria, PVV/Wilders in the Netherlands and others which adopt communications similar to US Republicans. They are mostly immune to scandals, poltical legacy and refuted facts, thus not conservative. Even Obama's positions would be unacceptable to modern European conservatives because he endorses death penalty, torture and targeted killings.

    84. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is that more crazy than believing some guy talked to a burning bush and received clay tablets from god that no one saw?

      Mormon beliefs are no more crazy than any religion

    85. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by MachineShedFred · · Score: 3, Informative

      Somehow I have a feeling, that of those 15M mormons, only about 14.9M of them would be saying "Linus who?" if they read any of this.

      Only in a community like Slashdot is this guy revered as some kind of opinion maker. Not a single damn is given in the rest of society.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    86. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      End of world, gun loving, extreme right wing, Obama is the Antichrist etc...

      In no way is this exclusive to mormonism. There are plenty of cross sections of American society that share those beliefs.

      Hint: just because you like guns, or don't agree with the President, doesn't make you batshit crazy.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    87. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      On top of this - every actor, actress, musician on the planet is allowed to voice their opinion on politics, religion, etc

      And most people really wish they wouldn't. That doesn't really make your argument.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    88. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Live in Utah or Arizona for a big serving of what the Mormons can do if crossed.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    89. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      Now look, once you have got past the virgin birth of a god to a mortal woman, all the other rumors will pale in comparison and not seem so crazy.

    90. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which magic rock would this be? The only object of worship in the theology is the Godhead (Father, Son, Holy Ghost). If there are any Mormons worshiping holy rocks, I don't know them.

      Muslims and Jews worship rocks. Jews build temple on top of holy rocks and Muslims build mosque around a meteorite. Some Christian also worship rock where Jesus's corps was allegedly laid on. I hate to think that, if left unchecked, politicly correctness will allow one of these hateful bronze age rock worshipper destroy our civilizations. There is no moderate-anything in religion, the so call moderate are just closet atheist that acknowledge their cultural history. These peoples need to grow some backbones, get out of the closet and tell the religious fucktards of their community to shut the fuck off.

    91. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      If 12 people with a degree in separation claim they saw that or anything else no matter how incredible it sound, then it is credible that something happened to make you all think you saw it. Usually, this is enough to convict someone of a crime as far as evidence goes- no matter how outlandish your claim might be.

      I'm not sure why that seems like such a shock to you. But it is the way the world works.

      I agree, but that does't make it credible that it was actually seeing the plates that caused them all to think they saw the plates. I can imagine it would be quite easy to get someone to say that they saw golden plates and write a testimony to that effect. The fact that the seeing the plates allows you to marry the hot 16yo next door and have a credible excuse to give your existing wife would have no bearing on my testimony, however it may affect others judgement.

    92. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by heathen_01 · · Score: 2
    93. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These peoples need to grow some backbones, get out of the closet and tell the religious fucktards of their community to shut the fuck off.

      I forgot to add; Until they do that, the 'moderate' are guilty of their extremist's bigotry. Silence implies consent.

      When muslim blasphemator kill peoples in the name of Allah (what can be worst blaspheme for a 'religion of peace'?), nobody protest the killing; The moderates approve in silence. But when one guy make a cartoon of that violent warlord pedophile, the whole muslim world go down in rage. And again, no moderates express any form of disagreement.

    94. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      So any religion created after the first century BC gets the harsh treatment?

      Maybe.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    95. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      On this particular Romney quote Linus was wrong. However his remark was still right on the money IMHO

    96. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The one that helped John Smith with his "translations." I suppose I should say Mormons let the words of a magic rock dictate their beliefs. Is that better?

    97. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by aicrules · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your opinion doesn't make it true, just like Mormons' opinion that they're not batshit crazy doesn't make it true. Use of trite name calling, vulgar or otherwise is a poor excuse for actually providing meaningful evidence that something is true, and in fact is commonly the argument of choice for actual fucking morons.

    98. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A modern Mormon maybe. When Mormonism was the same age as Scientology it was pretty extreme. They used to practice human sacrifice for major crimes, and Utah was essentially a theocracy.

      You mean, "they had the death penalty for murderers"? Yeah, that's so extreme that it's still practiced in 33 US states. We can argue about the morality and utility of the death penalty, but the Mormons were hardly unique for practicing the death penalty in the 19th century.

      As for the theocracy bit, that's almost unavoidable when almost 100% of the population belongs to the same church, which was the situation in Utah for almost a century after it's founding.

    99. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Yes, words matter, but I don't think Linus was being crass or was using crass words.

      He was using effectual words.

      Think about it - if he'd said "very unintelligent" and "very much on the fringe", it wouldn't have the same impact as "fucking moron" and "batshit crazy".

      Crass would be saying something like "a fucking moron who deserves to be beaten to death for his stupidity" and "batshit crazy child molesting religious zealot who'd be happy to start world war 3 by baptising the prophet Mohammed into the Mormon faith".

    100. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Case in point:
      The dominant religion in the United States is Christianity
      The main target audience of South Park are United States citizens
      South Park frequently parodies Christianity
      Somehow, not only are Parker and Stone still alive (and to my knowledge, have never had violence committed against them due to South Park Jesus), but their show is quite popular in a country where the show makes fun of the dominant religion...

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    101. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      just because you like guns, or don't agree with the President, doesn't make you batshit crazy.

      There is a difference between not liking someone and thinking they are the Antichrist. Also it is one thing to believe in the 2nd amendment, another to be posting numerous FB links every day about how great guns are and how anyone that doesn't agree is stupid.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    102. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're watching you. Keep it up, buddy. You'll regret it.

    103. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by godefroi · · Score: 1

      If you believe the "words" came from a "magic rock", then it shouldn't be a large leap to believe that they came from a divine being. If you don't, then "words of a magic rock" shouldn't be any more crazy than "words of a stone tablet" (Moses) or "words of a cave" (Mohammed).

      If you don't believe any of that, then it's all just the crazy imaginings of the loony religious. I don't get why one is more crazy than the other.

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    104. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by godefroi · · Score: 2

      Hint: just because you like guns, or don't agree with the President, doesn't make you batshit crazy.

      No, but I fully intend to go batshit crazy someday, and I plan to have lots of guns by the time I get there. Simple correlation? Who can say?

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    105. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by godefroi · · Score: 1

      They call that one Scientology.

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    106. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by adlib24 · · Score: 1
      I've been reading /. for over a decade. I've been a Mormon longer than that.

      I get your Meh point and should probably just go back to coding, but I want to say that rejecting Linux over this would be like getting angry at the Hierarchy because Chomsky is a political personality: Sheer stupidity. Chomsky and Linus are complex and interesting people. Most Mormons are the same way. However, I worry that Romeny doesn't normalize Mormonism, but rather reinforces a very specific stereotype around Mormons and business.

    107. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by godefroi · · Score: 1

      There's a billboard (or used to be, at least) on SR-201 around here that advertises a support group or club or something for athiests. They meet Sunday mornings. The irony is so thick you can cut it with a knife.

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    108. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Kidbro · · Score: 1

      Die in flames, you worthless heretic! The cloud was purple!

    109. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by unimacs · · Score: 1

      Effectual words?

      Impact?

      What impact did he really have?

      I wouldn't have suggested "very unintelligent" or "very much on the fringe" as alternatives anyway. I'm not a Mormon nor am I a believer in any particular faith. Many faiths have teachings that I respect while at the same time propose things that I find unbelievable. I don't know why you'd want to single out any one of the major faiths in particular as being more crazy than another. My guess is that many of the things that Western society (even secular society) holds dear today will be seen as crazy and foolish 200 years from now.

    110. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, but when there are twelve credible witnesses attesting to a fact and you claiming that they were somehow fooled, the burden is then on you to prove that they were fooled, not on them to prove that they weren't.

      And if this really was all about Joseph Smith trying to have sex with young women, it seems like a really convoluted way to go about it. Not to mention the horrible persecution that he suffered during his life. In addition to being assassinated, he was publicly ridiculed, tarred and feathered, physically assaulted on numerous occasions, and condemned to death by obviously sham trials more than once. If he really didn't believe in what he was preaching, you'd think he would've given up and found a less painful occupation.

    111. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your proof that they never saw them is...what? Because all eleven men seem to have been pretty clear on the point.

      "Be it known unto all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people, unto whom this work shall come: That we, through the grace of God the Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ, have seen the plates which contain this record..."

      --and--

      "Be it known unto all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people, unto whom this work shall come: That Joseph Smith, Jun., the translator of this work, has shewn unto us the plates of which hath been spoken, which have the appearance of gold; and as many of the leaves as the said Smith has translated we did handle with our hands; and we also saw the engravings thereon..."

      They didn't just claim that they saw them. They claimed that they laid hands on them, felt them, etc.

    112. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why are you a mormon? Is it because you looked at all available religions and selected the one that seemed closest to the truth as you see it? Or was it because your parents are mormon?

    113. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      I misread this as "the three and eight waitresses" and thought, "so, they attested to serving him lunch on gold plates? Why so many waitresses?"

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    114. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by bjdevil66 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Live in Utah or Arizona for a big serving of anti-Mormons coming up with thinly veiled bigotry like this.

      More often than not, they're just excuses for shifting blame from some problem they have in their own lives to some boogeyman (in this case, the LDS church, the "Mormon mafia", etc.). Here's a sample of the whining you'll hear:

      Kids - "They won't be friends with me because I'm not Mormon."..."My parents said I couldn't play with Mormons because they're bad." (Yes, that level of bigotry still exists in 2012. I've seen it firsthand.)

      Teenagers/young adults - "She won't date me because I'm not Mormon."... "Those f**king Mormons f**king think they're better than me because I (fill in the blank). F**k them all."

      Adults - "I got fired because I'm not Mormon."... "Mormons are only nice neighbors with other Mormon neighbors... What are their names? Why should I know?"... "They didn't vote for me because I'm not Mormon."... "I didn't get the promotion because I'm not Mormon. I bet a MORMON got it, instead."... "They wouldn't listen to me because I'm not Mormon." "They didn't accept my offer because another offer was from a Mormon."

      Yes, there are some Mormon jerks, but they aren't living the spirit of their own religion, and more importantly, there are jerks in EVERY religion.

      Bottom line: People that play those whiny cards - especially those who live around a lot of Mormons and see the good they actually do in society (vs. just listening to secondhand hearsay - like the vague crap this parent post spewed) need to grow a pair and take responsibility for their own lives.

    115. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Unordained · · Score: 1

      a) Our political dialogue is dominated by sound-bites and trite name-calling. Undecided voters are swung by the stupidest things, while the party loyalists can't be swayed even by the best arguments. All you'll get, when you try to have a sane conversation about policy, is stereotypes, generalizations, exaggerations and spin. The fact that someone actually says what they're thinking is just a rare glimpse into how reductionist we are when it comes to politics. We don't have time for all the details. We can't even remember all of them, to even begin to manipulate them into logical thoughts. We must take shortcuts. Once we've heard enough from someone, we just rubber-stamp it with either "awesome" or "fucking stupid", and file it away forever, never to be reconsidered. We have to, because time is short, and there are more important things in life, like food and shelter.

      b) Have you tried arguing with religious folks, on a basis of pure logic & fact? It doesn't work. Faith prevents it; faith is the great escape route, the great shield. Any argument you don't like can be avoided or circumvented or overcome (in your own mind) thanks to faith. It's a get-out-of-jail-free card. It's already hard enough (nigh impossible) to convince (forcibly) someone of something logically, when they're set against it, even when they have no faith to fall back on (they can always just "fail to see your point" or "not be convinced yet".) But when they do have faith? It's pointless to even try. You'll just frustrate yourself. So after a while of trying, experience teaches you to stop hurting yourself. Stop bashing your head against a brick wall. Call a spade a spade, and call batshit-crazy religions exactly what they are: batshit-crazy. And be done with it. There's no logical counter-argument to it, so you might as well. It's not an issue of being lazy or incompetent or malicious or cowardly or inconsiderate, just efficient.

    116. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      That's a new one. I've heard all kinds of bizarre falsehoods and misunderstandings, but confusing Mormonism with Islam? That would be funny if the implications weren't so severe.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    117. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      ...Joseph Smith's story about the golden plates that no-one ever saw...

      Does that include the eleven men who saw them - most of which left the church completely within ten years but still never denied seeing them? That is undisputed, historical fact.

      and his excuses for why he couldn't translate the same transcript the same way twice.

      That's assuming that the people that took the 1st transcript had truly altruistic and pure motives, and weren't just out to debunk the "prophet" by dishonestly altering the 1st and saying, "See - you aren't a real prophet because they don't match," when the 2nd translation of the same work came out. "Religious" people have never used logic like, "The ends justify the means", right?

    118. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by gd2shoe · · Score: 0
      Imagine a comment that went something like this:

      allegedly, that would be caving to shentino, as in "don't piss me off or I will hurt you"

      Which smacks of intimidation.

      I'm saying that if someone gets hurt because someone pissed off shentino, that would be intimidation.

      You see what just happened there? Someone who has not made any kind of threat, or moved to threaten has been impugned of intimidation. No evidence has been brought to bear, nor need be.

      I'm not sure you mean to be unreasonably, but you certainly sound that way.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    119. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      Testifying to have simply seen a book made of gold (that's all 8 claimed to have seen - nothing "divine", just a book of golden "plates") isn't exactly on the same level as claiming to have seen a dead mean standing on a cloud, is it?

      More importantly, if eleven people - all of which had good reason to lie about it out of spite but still didn't - testified of something in court today under oath that you're arguing against, and you had no physical proof to stand against it, you'd better have a REALLY good lawyer 'cause you're gonna lose.

    120. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      Romney will only help to normalize Mormonism if he gets elected. That said, he's going to reinforce skewed stereotypes to many people regardless.

    121. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      You should ignore the "facts" if you never actually saw the homeless guy, but were relying on news reports and other people telling you, in breathless tones, about how crazy the guy on the corner is.
      That's what we're getting in this election cycle: all news has been spun and blended.
      think about it this way, what headlines have you been seeing:

      "Romney gaffes about windows on planes opening"
      "Romney calms wife with joke about plane"
      "Romney bravely carries on in face of wife's danger".

    122. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Ignoring all of the other crazy Morman stuff for the moment, Mormans also have magic underwear.

      They're probably no more crazy than any other religious fundamentalists, but that is a really low bar.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    123. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Sez the AC...

    124. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by BeansBaxter · · Score: 1

      Well said. From the other side try being a Mormon anywhere else. See how you get treated there.

    125. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      The one that helped John Smith with his "translations." I suppose I should say Mormons let the words of a magic rock dictate their beliefs. Is that better?

      No, but at least you're being clear now.

      Today, if I want to read the word of God, I can sit down at a magic box, wave my fingers around, and it will tell me the exact passages that I asked for. Seems absolutely crazy, doesn't it?

      Once you accept the bare concept of a Divine being, one must accept the probability that said being knows a lot more about possible technology than we do. (read: the use of science that is currently beyond our understanding)

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    126. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      replace "guns" with "popular boy singer" and you've just described lots of teenage girls' facebook accounts.
      I'm sure a coin collector might rattle on about coins.
      car enthusiasts spend all day on vehicle minutiae.

    127. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      Ah, you've been reading bad fiction again. I can count the truths in that link on one hand.

      Yes, Mormons wear symbolic undergarments. They are disparagingly referred to as "magic underwear". Everything else on that page was written by someone with an ax to grind.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    128. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I'm an American conservative, and I don't care if you're blue, green, white or brown: you're still a dick.
      Or should I run on the old diatribe that your'e a communist?
      No, wait, I don't go with the knee jerk stereotypical viewpoints, so I won't.

    129. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference... when someone says "people are stupid" they're quite likely one of them... and so the statement is sumiltaneously offensive and self-deprecating. When they say something to the effect of "you and your type (which I am not one of) are stupid", it is only offensive....

    130. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Joe's revelations occurred recently enough that we can examine some of the evidence.

      Chewy and Mo's revelations occurred so long ago there is no hope of checking up on them. Though there are some stories in the Koran related to Abraham that correspond to common old biblical translation errors as well.

      Which means to be a Mormon you have to be able to rationalize the exact same translation errors in Joe's bible somehow also occurring in the 'divinely revealed translations from Egyptian' that Joe allegedly got from an angel/rock/hat. Seems including a couple of chapters of the bible as credibility padding was a bad call.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    131. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are the chances that those 11 people stick to that story for the rest of their lives? Not likely.

    132. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The question becomes why would God include translation errors from the King James Bible in the translations from Egyptian that he sends to a modern Prophet?

      Must be to test our faith.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    133. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      No one takes ancient greek mythology seriously, nor the Norse gods.

      Apparently you didn't see Thor.

      Dude was bad-ass with that hammer.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    134. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Since Jesus was voted as a god only 2 centuries later, I guess you used a bad example.

      Maybe yes, maybe no.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    135. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      How about... in the global pool of religions, where one is just as silly as the next, I picked the one that I figured was the most interesting and least dangerous.

      Good enough for you or are you an 1) atheist or 2) evangelical looking to pick a fight? If so, I really don't care what you think.

    136. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by neo8750 · · Score: 1

      Its only bad if it's not your church doing it (read as not the catholic church) Because this has been going on for years and no one has ever complained before. Just saying. Not implying you are catholic or any religious domination BTW.

    137. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I will freely stipulate that believing the word of a magic rock is not any more crazy than believing in an omnipotent god, or believing that god chose to communicate through the writings of a number of Jewish misfits, kings and other personalities, heavily edited and selected by (very human) committee.

      Although, since only John Smith was allowed to hear the rock talk, some people might consider it a little more fallible (although I'm not sure why). Those suspicions might be reinforced when they discover that John Smith's published (revelatory) translations of certain Egyptian hieroglyphic documents, produced before anyone knew how to read hieroglyphics, are inconsistent with the rosetta stone, everything else that's known about hieroglyphics, and are complete fabrications in the expert opinions of modern egyptologists.

    138. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Mr.Intel · · Score: 1

      If Mormons can't see past one dev, can't see that Linus is just one cog in a very large machine, that's their problem and not his.

      Don't worry... most of us are fairly even keeled. Bigoted attacks on my religion, I can handle. Ad hominem attacks on my personal views? No problem. Just don't take away my tax credits for charitable contributions. I'd much rather support the homeless than Uncle Sam.

      --
      ASCII tastes bad dude.
      Binary it is then.
    139. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      I've always been somewhat baffled by some of the misconceptions towards the Mormons. I'm not Mormon myself (or even religious, for that matter), nor do I ever plan to be, but I have nothing against them. My brother and his family are Mormon, and several of my best friends are Mormon, so I've had a lot of exposure, even unto attending Mormon church services now and then. My impression as an outsider is this: While I don't agree with everything about the Mormon faith, I have to admit that the Mormons I've known have been some of the nicest people I know.

      Granted, I don't live in Utah or Arizona (I'm in California, so reasonably close), but I've been to Salt Lake City and had no negative experiences there. There are always bad people in every religion who give it a bad name--just look at what's happening in the Muslim world right now. The bad things the Mormons do (excluding blacks until the late 1970s, the polygamist compounds in Arizona, etc.), however, are a lot less troublesome than that another, larger religion I already mentioned.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    140. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      Belonging to Scientology also entails spending tens of thousands of dollars for "auditing" and "reprogramming", excommunication of people (even family members) that speak out against Scientology, suing people to oblivion (as you mentioned) for the same, and other things. The Mormons? Eh, they're just generally nice and helpful. We once had a bunch of Mormon missionaries offer to come over and help us hang up Christmas lights, despite the fact that we're neither Mormon nor have any intent to become Mormon.

      My point is, what they did in the past is inconsequential. What they do now is important for anyone considering joining their faith. It's like saying you would refuse to move to the US because we once had slaves. Everyone has skeletons in their closet--it's just that Scientology has its skeletons on display and is quite proud of them.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    141. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      Why is it crazy to be very interested in guns, when you consider the huge variety of manufacturers, models, types, etc., as well as the long history of firearms in general? I know plenty of people that are "car nuts", but nobody thinks they're crazy. Is it because guns can be used in violence? Then why do most people (so far as I know) have no issue with martial arts enthusiasts, which often includes the study of swords or other weapons?

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    142. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      What I find more disturbing than the Mormons' undergarments (which seem to me to be analogous to wearing a cross or other religious symbol) is that your source for information on them is Urban Dictionary.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    143. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by orgelspieler · · Score: 2

      Wikipedia says the Joseph Smith Papers are published by the LDS. So I doubt there's a smoking gun in there. It's not like he said "If you want to get rich, you start a religion." People know all the crazy shit about Scientology, but they're still a growing religion. So faith is harder to shatter than you think. Cases in point: People still have faith that there were WMDs in Iraq (32% in May) and that Obama is a secret Muslim (17% in July).

    144. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uncle Joe was a con-man, a swindler, and a womanizer and he documented such in his own journals. Read the Joseph Smith Papers, volumes 1 and 2. Prepare to have your faith shattered, my friend. He documented his own exploits and still people believe the nonsense, it's absolutely incredible.

      Seriously? The Joseph Smith Papers Project was established and funded by the LDS church. It is logically inconsistent that they would be somehow damning evidence of your assertion. Seems like your reading through a biased lense, my friend.

    145. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Personally I don't want to single out any one religion - major or not.

      If you, as an adult, believe in some supernatural being that there is no testable evidence in support of, be it God, Jahwe, Allah, unicorns, angels, demons, Easter bunnies, visiting space aliens, ghosts, fairies or whatever else you can think of, I reserve the right to think of you as being batshit cray.

      You may be an all round nice person, hell you may even be quite intelligent, and you're free to believe anything you want - but you're still batshit crazy.

      I just picked some of the (in my opinion) crazy things, stereotypes and myths that are prevelant about Mormons, as that is Romney's religion.

    146. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But does anyone really care?

      Almost 1000 comments on this page alone, so......?

    147. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by unimacs · · Score: 1

      My point is that we all probably believe stuff that's not even close to being accurate. Many of us are even passionate about these things that we've been taught or that we'd really really like to believe because they fit our world view. That doesn't make us crazy. It makes us normal.

      The minute you start treating somebody like they're batshit crazy, you've severely diminished any chance of getting them to see your side.

      Why do you think congress has such a hard time getting anything accomplished? It's because they're so bent on diminishing the other side's position that it makes agreeing with each other on anything extremely difficult.

    148. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Scientology is young. As I said, when Mormonism was the same age they were practicing human sacrifice in their own theocracy. Scientologists are a bunch of amateurs when it comes to religious extremism. Modern Mormons are mostly (mostly, there are still quite a few crazy, polygamous, child abusing ones with guns that ALSO make Scientologists look cute) pretty mainstream people but it took years, violence and some artillery to encourage them to be that way.

      Not that even modern, mainstream Mormons are entirely cuddly. They still do obnoxious things like baptizing people against their will and barring families from participating in or even watching weddings if they're not Mormon.

    149. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by WeatherServo9 · · Score: 1

      argh, selected wrong moderation; posting to undo

    150. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by KeensMustard · · Score: 1
      The most ironic thing is that atheism has become the new hate.

      It's a fairly common character weakness to want to blame the world's ills on some "other" - on a group of faceless caricatures who differ from the "us" in some arbitrary way. The world's ills are the fault of the black, the jew, the brown immigrant, the arab, the gay, the muslim, the theist.

    151. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with this. As a full on Romney supporter, Linus words only reflect poorly on his own judgment, not that of the community's. Linux is still a great OS and group of millions of users and developers. We all have our own political opinions.

    152. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by nilbog · · Score: 1

      To be fair, all that stuff happened to the Mormons because of how they were acting towards their neighbors.

      Joseph Smith was tarred and feathered not by an angry "anti-mormon" mob but by his own people for trying to get John Johnson's 15 year old daughter to be one of his plural wives (some time before the polygamy doctrine was revealed). This, by the way, he did several times successfully - marrying several teenagers women who were already married to other men (as you can confirm on familysearch.org). It wasn't hard to get a bunch of people to help tar and feather Joseph because they had all given their money to Joseph's Bank of Kirtland which promptly failed and suddenly there money was gone (it had gone to pay Joseph's debts).

      Further, Governor Boggs was against the mormons because Joseph Smith had prophisied the untimely demise of Boggs just before one of his destroying angels showed up (Porter Rockwell) and shot him four times in the head (he lived). The Mormons were also playing dangerous political games and Joseph Smith (and Hyrum) were both shopping around the "mormon vote" simultaneously making friends and enemies all over the state. To top it off, Joseph Smith taught that they were to come into god's inheritance by the sword and began terrorizing and stealing from their neighboring towns.

      The Haun's Mill Masacre was a really unfortunate incident, but not nearly as bad as the Mountain Meadows Massacre.

      It's not at all surpising you don't hear the REAL history in Sunday School, but it does allow Mormons to walk around and play the "victim card" every time their history is brought up. Unfortunately, people who actually have a clue about what happened just laugh in their faces.

      P.S. Feel free to disregard the above true history of events as "anti-mormon" propaganda. I'm sure the church's version is completely unbiased.

      --
      or else!
    153. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mormon beliefs are no more crazy than any religion

      Right. So we're agreed: They're all equally batshit crazy.

    154. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      The OSS movement shouldn't care about what other people think. Software is created and put out in the wild in the hope that others will benefit. Whether a particular class of people use it or not is typically irrelevant (unless they are the target of the software). The only people who are likely to greatly care about this are the people trying to make money off of open source software.

      Is there an problem in trying to make off of open source software?

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    155. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      I'll give you a less problematic example, Pi.

      My father, born in 1944, and very good at the mates he's been taught (left school after 7th grade).

      It took me about ten minutes to make him grasp the concept of imaginary numbers by using the two,dimensional number line.

      Smart. Quick to learn. Refuses to "unlearn".

      You see, back in his school days, they were taught that Pi = 22/7. It wasn't an approximation - that was the exact value.

      So far I think I've spent close to ten hours, trying every conceivable way I can think of, to demonstrate why 22/7th isn't Pi, but he believes in that particular dogma.

      THAT makes him batshit crazy. In a fairly limited scope, but he's still btshit crazy, when he not only believes that Pi is 22/7th, but will actively reject out of hand, proof that goes against his claim, at one point even saying, essentially, just because those guys (the expert mathematicians) say its a different number, that doesn't make my teacher wrong, nor does it mean that I misundertood - 22/7th isn't an approximation of Pi, it IS Pi.

      You cannot argue with batshit crazy people, even when they're otherwise extremely lovely people that you know, care about and love!

      When he gets into one of those moods, tell him that I have interest in the discussions, and I'll leave. And when he asks why, I tell him exactly why.

    156. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Quanticfx · · Score: 1

      Living in AZ I've seen some of the things you mention.

      Mormons do seem a bit more cliquey than some of the other religions though. When I first moved into my neighborhood I had a few of the Mormon neighbors come over and talk to me on a somewhat regular basis. As they got to know me and eventually find out I'm agnostic, and would not be converting, they stopped talking to me, not slowly one by one but all at once. This being my first dealings with any Mormons I was kind of taken aback.

      One of the guys I work with, and is married to a Mormon but isn't Mormon himself, confirmed that's generally how it is and that they are a very tight knit group.

      This is just a single anecdote from my limited experience so take it with a grain of salt.

    157. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      And your parents being Mormon was just a coincidence?

    158. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      Lol. I've heard it all before. J.Smith wasn't the only one tarred and feathered, or murdered. But it must all be the mormon's fault. What bad neighbors they were. (If I was treated how they were treated I might not be such a nice neighbor either.) Because his actions justify the rape and murder of others, including women and children. Right.....

      There's lots of problems with the so called evidence of J.Smith being an early womanizer. The story of Marinda Johnson is complete with contradictions. At the end of the day, the attack against him had little to do with supposed womanizing, accusations of which don't show up until long after the events (like 12 years later.) Go read the other side of the story. http://en.fairmormon.org/Polygamy_book/Early_womanizer

      Boggs was shot by an unknown assailant and your 'prophesy' is based on the imagination of John Bennett, an active anti-mormon who was booted out for homosexuality, adultery, performing of abortions and polygamy, among other things. He was given more than one chance once caught. He actually vowed to drink the blood of J.S. he hated him so much. Yeah, I'm going to take his word for it as the unbiased party.

      And really, Haun's mill not as bad? Really? I suppose it was all Brigham's fault; they must have brought it on themselves they did. Yup, that justifies all the persecution they got. I'm not defending the MMM. It was very unfortunate, but I can also understand how people who had repeatedly persecuted and driven out of the US, with an army coming to exterminate them might get jumpy and do something stupid. But of course that doesn't matter to you because you are apparently smarter than the rest of us and are yourself a completely unbiased party. So we must have deserved it. Question, do you say the same thing about the holocaust?

      The only thing I agree with you on is the politics. People in the area were terrified of the 'mormon' vote b/c they would vote as a block; but not the nonsense about inheriting by the sword and terrorizing neighboring towns. (You don't mean those towns that sent mobs to burn them out of their homes in the middle of the night do you? Certainly not the ones where little children had to walk for miles in bear feet in the middle of winter over the frozen stubble of wheat fields that cut up their feet and left trails of blood? Not the ones where many of those children died from exposure? Certainly not those ones... because all those towns folk were perfect neighbors. )

      What, because I don't believe all of your 'evidence' from the people who were trying to destroy them I'm clueless? Hmm.. maybe you're just a bigot. My guess is your either an evangelical who 'loves' us or an ex mormon. Either way, all your repeating is tired old allegations we've heard for 100 years now, or more.

    159. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should also mention that Boggs was the one who put out the extermination order.... and that one of the reasons so many people hated the mormons wasn't because of polygamy (which wasn't an official practice until 12 years later) but because the Mormons were anti-slavery and treated blacks and natives as equals and even wanted women to vote! Those nasty backwards mormons.

      For those of you still thinking in stereotypes, women living in polygamous mormon families (not anything like what the fundamentalists do today) weren't married off under age, most often had their own houses, were educated, had the right to vote (yes, they were the first women with the right to vote in north america) and often ran their own businesses. The abolishment of polygamy in Utah set women's rights back 100 years for them.

    160. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      Father is Catholic, mother was United. You just assumed my parents are Mormon.

    161. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by nilbog · · Score: 1

      So why do you think the mormons were so persecuted? Does your version of reality really include the possibility that the people around wherever the Mormons were just hated the truth so much they wanted to murder Mormons? The idea is ridiculous. The people around the mormons were REACTING to the mormons building an army and the rhetoric from Joseph Smith about establishing God's Kingdom throughout the whole earth. Yea the people did awful things, but the mormons were doing awful things to them as well, and not just in reaction to what was being done to them. Had the mormons lived peacefully with their neighbors there would not have been problems. Modern day Mormons don't seem to be having any trouble, because Mormonism has become a peaceful religion.

      --
      or else!
    162. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      There were many drivers to why people hated the mormons back in the day, not just reactions to the mormons. Geez if your reactions to your neighbours leads you to rape, pillage and kill them I'm not going to blame it on them. Everyone is accountable for *how* they react to things. It was impossible for them to live 'peacefully' with their neighbours, that's a naive thing to say. 19th century USA wasn't exactly the place of tolerance and acceptance for people who are different. Mormonism was *always* a peaceful religion, it didn't just become one. The thing is that religions are made up of people, and when you push people enough they eventually push back. I hear lots of people on this thread saying that Linus should speak his mind no matter whether it's politically correct or not. Yet when we get to the mormons any time they pushed back or spoke up it's somehow not ok. Double standard much?

      Here are some of the *real* reasons why mormons were hated:
      1) Mormon theology was by 19th century norms, unorthodox, and in the 1840's when J.S. introduced many new ideas, heretical. When J.S. started talking about gold plates the persecution was either from other pastors who found it heretical (revelation is gone! the heavens are closed! everyone knows that!) or from people who wanted to steal them from him.
      2) Mormon theology and cosmology was very attractive. When mormonism first came on the scene people converted in droves. Entire congregations converted en-mass leaving many pastors without livelihoods. (That's what happened with Sydney Rigdon.) Those pastors saw it as a huge threat both doctrinally and financially. They didn't take it lying down, in fact much of the earliest and most vociferous persecution comes as a result of this.
      3) Mormons were very insular. They tended to only patronize businesses that were also mormon. There were many reasons for this, such as people poising the wine they sold them for sacrament services, but they also to blame.
      4) Joseph Smith was quite egalitarian. He believed in freedom and equality for all people. He even ordained blacks to the priesthood. Unfortunately that brought a lot of persecution and he stopped the practise. (Again, unfortunately he didn't really explain why he stopped it and no one resumed it again until the 1970's but that's another discussion.) You have this against the backdrop of mounting tensions that eventually lead to the civil war. People accused them of stirring up the indians and blacks to rebellion because they were teaching them that they were and should be equal to whites.
      5) The failure of the kirkland bank pissed off a lot of people, both mormon and non-mormon. There are a lot of reasons why it failed. If you are interested you can read the LDS side of the story here: http://en.fairmormon.org/Mormonism_and_church_finances/Kirtland_Safety_Society
      6) Early mormon converts typically came from poverty or lower class backgrounds. Middle & Upper class people largely looked down on them and saw them as a threat. They feared being over-run by the poor and needy, largely b/c of the next point.
      7) Politics as I already mentioned. J.S. run for president scared a lot of people as did his prophecy that the new jerusalem would be in jackson county. (had nothing to do with an prophesy about gods kingdom over the whole earth. In fact most 19th century protestants believed that was going to happen anyway at the time of christ's second coming.) People there feared the mormons would overwhelm them and drive them out. The opposite happened of course.
      8) Immigration. The LDS church brought a lot of poor foreigners into the areas where they lived. Locals saw it as an economic threat.
      9) Polygamy in the Navoo period. It scandalized most europeans. Although there was good and bad elements to it it's not what people think of today when they look at the mormon fundamentalists. A very small percentage of people practised it and usually if you had money you got

    163. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      Snap!

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    164. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      It is less, "look at this cool gun" and more, "your a fucking communist/socialist/liberal idiot if you don't think your life should revolve around guns".

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    165. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by flyneye · · Score: 1

      I came from a small community in a different state with an RLDS church. It's members were upstanding members of the community and mixed well. No problems.
      I lived in AZ during the when political nepotism and corruption of the Ed Meecham administration, and the dumping of misbehaved Mormon children from some Utah back water sects into the streets of Phoenix.
      I, personally, can recognize that like there are backwater factions of Islam and Christendom that abuse the imagined limits of their faith, there are Mormon factions that upset others with their extreme actions as well. Like marrying multiple child-brides and running a dictatorial community along with criminal violence.
      Generally, I still think of Donny and Marie though.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    166. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen, you idiots. It's all true, it's all down in black and white in this book which has to be true, you can't tell me millions of people are that stupid. It's obvious for those who let themselves see. He will return from the dead and the dead will rise and with him smite the evil minions of the dark lord. And then the lord Aragorn will marry Arwen Evenstar and along with Gandalf and Bilbo everyone will sail off into the sunset and live happily ever after in the next world.

    167. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try making public criticism about Muslims and Mohammed. Why do they get treated differently? Because people are hypocrites. Draw a picture of Mohammed and post in on /. I dare you. Or shut the fuck up about it being Mormons' problem. Difference? Mormons will complain. Muslims will kill you. So, either you have a double standard, or you're chicken shit.

      BTW, you also supported the CEO of Chik-Fil-A saying what he did about homosexuality, right? Because what should his comments have to do with his restaurant. Please respond and tell me that his comments meant nothing, and that it's the gays' problem, and not Chik-Fil-A's. Prove you really believe what you stated.

    168. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it take more double think than that required for someone dying on Friday and coming back on Sunday?

      Well Mormonism includes all the christian/catholic double think, and then adds the extra levels of Joseph Smith double think. So by definition I guess that it requires more .

      For an atheist you seem to know or think you know a lot about mormonism.

      It is funny how you spout off all this random crap like we are brainwashed and such but what do you say to all the people that were not brought up believing mormonism?

      What do you say to my dad who didn't become mormon until he was in his 20's?

      I'm sure you have plenty of excuses you've made up not to believe this or that religion.

    169. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bright or not, that would be caving to alleged mormon influence, as in "don't piss us off or we will hurt you"

      Which smacks of intimidation.

      Post a picture of Mohammed, and I'll buy into your comment. If not, you're chicken shit, and a hypocrite.

    170. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joseph Smith also married the wife of Orson Hyde while Hyde was away serving a mission in Jerusalem/Palestine. While Orson and Nancy Hyde divorced later in life, THEY WERE MARRIED when Smith supposedly received a revelation from God that they should be married, despite Nancy Hyde already being married to Orson Hyde.

      The events I'm referring to are colloquially known as "history" and you should try reading some before repeating the same nonsense you've been told since you were a kid. Do some research and you'll discover the exact same things I discovered. IT SUCKS. I was devastated. I eventually got over the fact that the people who lied to me were well-meaning and didn't realize they were lied to as well.

      Uncle Joe was a con-man, a swindler, and a womanizer and he documented such in his own journals. Read the Joseph Smith Papers, volumes 1 and 2. Prepare to have your faith shattered, my friend. He documented his own exploits and still people believe the nonsense, it's absolutely incredible.

      Yeah I am sure they were the official Joseph Smith papers. Dude you sound like a nigerian scammer. I don't doubt your story or whatever but all you so found previous mormons and "I found out the truth about Joseph Smith and he was this or that" He stole the manuscript for the BOM or he was a swindler. I have never seen actual proof showing this or that.

      I know a lot of what our church which is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints teaches is a lot more common sensical then what everyone else believes out there.

      Hey maybe I shouldn't drink a liquid that can also be used to run a car. Hmm...

      Hey maybe I shouldn't smoke something that I will get addicted to and get lung cancer. Hmm...

      Maybe I shouldn't do other things that will cause me to get addicted to and make life more challenging than it actually is. Hmm...

      Wow man these are some crazy cat$&@/ definately. Those of some crazy beliefs man! Who'd want to take care of their body and ya know live a long, healthy life and not pay a ton on health care? I dunno man I think those crazy mormons might though. ;)

    171. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your opinion doesn't make it true, just like Mormons' opinion that they're not batshit crazy doesn't make it true. Use of trite name calling, vulgar or otherwise is a poor excuse for actually providing meaningful evidence that something is true, and in fact is commonly the argument of choice for actual fucking morons.

      His opinion may or may not be true but he sounds like he has a heck of a lot more brains than you do.

    172. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bright or not, that would be caving to alleged mormon influence, as in "don't piss us off or we will hurt you"

      Which smacks of intimidation.

      What are they going to do, make all of their business investments run Windows servers?

      What Mormon influence and you call us crazy as bats?

      What influence do Mormons have except in Utah?

      When do/mormons hurt people?

      It is hard to tell if you are being sarcastic or not. I am going with not.

    173. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On behalf of all Mormons, you guys are making a far bigger deal out of it than we are. I read it and just went... meh.. it's Linus being Linus.

      I think we can handle' Linus' opinion after. oh, having the US Gov't try to exterminate us and being the target of 'Christian' hate, I mean Love, for a couple hundred years that resulting in smear campaigns, regular protests in front of our places of worship, tar and feathering, burning down our homes, raping our women and killing our children and murdering our leaders....

      You poor, persecuted victims

    174. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Imsdal · · Score: 1

      After about 300 years. No, not a joke, unfortunately.

    175. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      You are both generalizing from single events.

      And off-topic at that. You may have a lot of great people in Mormonism, but that doesn't mean their ideas are not crazy.

        People getting out of Scientology also say one of the reasons they joined were all the great people.

      Mormonism is a telltale sign of wanting to change the center of the world from the old Empire in Rome to the American Empire in the west. That's what it is.

    176. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      There's an even older saying: there's the truth, there's being mean, and it's being Finnish.

      Seriously, Torvald's a meek lamb compared to his countrymen.

      I don't expect any American to understand what 'culture' means, but in reference to Torvald's "outbursts" he is being funny in Finnish.

    177. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I recently moved to Utah and found out the hard way if you are not of the Mormon faith you are merely tolerated. I visited the church numerous times to find out for myself what the religion is about. I have read the Book of Mormon and listened to the tapes given to me by an Elder to become familiar with.

      One thing I can say is they have pages of top notch jobs listed on the bulletin boards which are to be filled only by Mormons.
          I do take responsibility for my own life but I saw the same thing in San Diego. 27 pages of really good jobs listed only for members of the church.

        Neighbors will treat you with tolerance but not much more. I also found out if my son got married in the temple I would not be allowed to attend. I am not worthy.

        Overall, I personally feel like "cult" is an appropriate use of the word. I see the polygamists in the stores and want to weep for the young girls. Yes, I know that is FLDS but still is supported by the church whether or not you admit it.

        Recently, the Democratic offices that opened were attacked with rocks. Cars are scratched if you dare sport an Obama sticker, tires have been slashed on those displaying democrat stickers.
      The church does in fact tell you how to vote. Sometimes it's outright and other times it is more implied. And the flock does exactly what they are told to do.

      I am petrified at the thought of a Mormon with the status that Romney carries in the church becoming our president. It keeps me awake at night. I have been here 5 years because I lost so much money in the housing crunch and I don't run from my obligations. But as soon as I can sell I am out of here. It's like living in the twilight zone.
      So it is not whining, it is not shifting blame, it is indeed the truth if you are NOT a Mormon and live in Utah. And the really scary thing is it is growing at a rate unlike any religion I have ever seen.

    178. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by steelyeyedmissileman · · Score: 1

      I know I may be a little late to the conversation here, but:

      Though I admit, getting my very own planet in the afterlife is a pretty tempting proposition.

      From Mormonism-101

      Do Latter-day Saints believe that they will “get their own planet”?
      No. This idea is not taught in Latter-day Saint scripture, nor is it a doctrine of the Church. This misunderstanding stems from speculative comments unreflective of scriptural doctrine. Mormons believe that we are all sons and daughters of God and that all of us have the potential to grow during and after this life to become like our Heavenly Father (see Romans 8:16-17). The Church does not and has never purported to fully understand the specifics of Christ’s statement that “in my Father’s house are many mansions” (John 14:2).

    179. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by steelyeyedmissileman · · Score: 1

      I know one family of Mormons and I have to agree, for the most part, they are batshit crazy.

      (emphasis added)

      In no way is this exclusive to mormonism.

      Can we all stop applying single data points to a broad culture? In no way is this inclusive of Mormonism either, nor to religion as a whole. Some people who ascribe themselves as Mormons or any other religion, perhaps, but not to religion (including the LDS faith) itself.

    180. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by steelyeyedmissileman · · Score: 1

      Mormonism is quite crazy as a religious belief though their believers seem to be very nice personalities.

      Do you say that because it's popular to brand the LDS religion as crazy, or do you have a specific reason to believe so? Come talk with us about what we really believe; you might be surprised. Oh, you may encounter a couple people who might encourage you to convert, maybe even the over-zealous member who says you have to convert, but you don't. It's still your choice, all the way through.

      If you really don't want to risk talking to one, this page may be helpful, at least in terms of the ideas currently popular to point at.

    181. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Just playing the odds. The vast majority of religious people believe whatever it was their parents believe. Religions survive through indoctrination, rather then being chosen on their merits.

    182. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by macgirl5150 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, don't agree. I recently moved from Southern CA to Utah. (I claim insanity) and Mormons own the state. There is no separation of church and state. The bigotry comes from the Mormons. This is not someone shifting blame or whining as you state. Rather a person who has attended the church and tithed in order to learn first hand about this religion. Truth - Both in SOCAL and Utah the church has pages upon pages of unadvertised top notch and much desired job openings. These listings are not open to the public and the Mormon church members are usually the ones doing the hiring as well. They have positioned themselves into almost every level of government and people better start waking up to take notice. If you are NOT Mormon you will be tolerated at best by your neighbors. You will be monitored by them as well. If you are a democrat you will be shunned. In some cases, your property may be destroyed. If your child decides to be a Mormon and is allowed to marry in the church, the parents will not be allowed to witness this or enter the temple (if they are not Mormon). You would not be worthy so you would have to attend an outside ceremony. If a doctor makes a mistake, good luck finding an attorney who will take a case. "Everyone makes mistakes" If you have any sort of criminal record (even from years ago) you will not be able to rent a place. Not even at a trailer park. You are told how to vote in the church. If not blatantly then it it insinuated. Oh, yes it is true. And the flock listens. If you are gay, might as well keep on going. There is no place for you. If you are a woman and not married when you die, you will not reach heaven but will forever be only a handmaiden to God. I could go on and on but this really isn't the right venue I guess. I just feel it is necessary to try to let people know how dangerous it is to let Romney in the White House. It scares me so badly I can't sleep at night. If I had not lost so much in the housing crash I would not be in this state as it is very oppressing and it is indeed run by the church. But I am not one to run from my obligations so I am stuck here for a while longer. Not every person who is a Mormon is evil. But I would classify this more of a cult than religion. Well, I feel most religions are close to being cults, but this one is something you should investigate before voting this November. Free country and all that, but this group is not welcoming to anyone with a past, they are not forgiving as they would have you believe, and if you are black or gay, or got in trouble with the law, move on. You are not welcome. Only recently were black men even allowed in the church or allowed to become elders. Seems sort of wrong to me. So to the person who says they are persecuted for being Mormon, PUHLEASE! Not in Utah where the mother ship is from! Nor Arizona,or Idaho where the church has a strong hold. The church even has strong ties with Las Vegas. I have posted these words not in hate nor bigotry and I only treat people with the respect they deserve but come on. I am tired of the propaganda being doled out. I must post anonymously for fear of retaliation. Even this is risky.

    183. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should switch to FreeBSD and make friends with the devil.

    184. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you that this often happens, people born into a religion are more likely to stay within that religion, but that's a generalization that has as more to do with the strength of socio-cultural influences than anything. That said, in my experience I have seen a lot of people, both former atheists and people from other religious backgrounds convert to Mormonism (I teach a class for 'investigators' / new members.)

      Bringing in new converts is a fairly common occurrence, so I don't buy into the hypothesis that religions survive through indoctrination, certainly not that religions survive *only* through indoctrination. I know that atheists typically carry this assumption (being a former atheist myself) that if religious people just knew the 'facts' they wouldn't be religious any more. (Certainly evangelicals believe that about mormonism, just see my other posts in this thread.) However, that's not actually true (otherwise how do new religious movements form and grow and in some small cases, go on to become world religions? ) There are a lot of reasons why people decide to believe, or come to believe in a certain faith tradition and they almost never have anything to do with science. What is scientifically right or wrong often doesn't matter to the average person, they have their own criteria. I think to try and generalize it down to lack of knowledge, lack of intelligence or some other common factor is going to lead you to some very false stereotypes.

      One last thing, converts always choose their new faith based on the 'merits,' even if those merits are totally subjective and relate only to them, so again, I would disagree with your general assumption.

    185. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand I can't think of a single way it could reflect well on the community.

      It shouldn't reflect on the 'community' at all - not one way or the other. Linus speaks for himself; not me, nor anyone I know. Anything he says is no reflection on me - even though I have been a Linux evangelist since 1994. Linus may be a genius - but he speaks for himself and himself only.
       

    186. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by godefroi · · Score: 1

      I believe the Mormons would say, "your bible is wrong." I also believe that's not uncommon, to prefer various slightly-different translations or interpretations of the bible.

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    187. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mormomism was a movement within the Second Great Awakening in the 19th century in America. As such it was an offshoot of Protestantism. Of course we know that the various types of Protestant sects had their origins in the Reformation in the 16th century.

      If Mormonism includes all the catholic double think, then I suppose that Catholics have been very consistent since the Reformation, or you are a know nothing, or both.

    188. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Or, one might say that it's unprofessional for actors and actresses to vent like this JUST LIKE it's unprofessional for him.

      Then again, they're professional narcissists, so it makes sense that they think everyone cares about their opinions.

      (I don't think it was unprofessional of him; he was stating his opinion, who cares? Just pointing out the begged question in your point.)

      --
      -Styopa
    189. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed the point shit for brains, he was merely saying that its incorrect to state that its incorrect to say nobody else CLAIMED to have seen the plates. Not trying to convince you Mormonism is true just trying to convince you to pull you head out of your ass.

    190. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      that's a generalization that has as more to do with the strength of socio-cultural influences than anything.

      That's true. We see it often in western Jews and Muslims, where they still identify themselves as part of their religious group, and follow some of the practices, even when many of them don't actually believe in a god.

      (otherwise how do new religious movements form and grow and in some small cases, go on to become world religions?)

      That's an interesting question. Let's ignore the ones that sprung up before modern science, as without scientific understanding, mysticism was the only explanation on offer for many things. Origin of species was in 1859, but it took some time to become accepted as mainstream science, so lets say religions in the 20th century.

      So what have we got? Scientology, Thelema and Wicca.

      Oops, battery on laptop running low... will come back to this...

    191. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by tqk · · Score: 1

      Could he have used more mature words?

      If you're speaking to your grandmother, mature words shows respect. Otherwise, "plain speaking" is preferred here. "Spit it out! What do you really want to say?!?" We can't read minds. The more effort you put into it, the more I can (potentially) get out of it. I don't much care what words, profane or otherwise, you use. I can take it.

      As much as I love him, Linus should stay out of politics. That stuff'll drive anybody insane. It's not simple !@#$ like nVidia kernel drivers.

      Now, I think I'm going to go bang my head on the stack of math books I've accumulated over the years but never did crack open. That should fill a day. :-|

      [Linus, you still rock. Keep on keepin' on. Go hug your wife!]

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    192. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      Are you counting only completely new theologies or new religious movements, because there are a lot. You can see a list of some of them here:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_new_religious_movements

    193. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      No, the King James Bible that Joe had included translation errors that have sense been corrected. Nobody disputes that these were translation errors, not even Mormons.

      The versions included in the book of Mormon had the exact same translation errors as Joe's copy.

      There are three explanations: 1. Joe was a grifter and simply copied from his KJB. 2. God caused Joe to read the incorrect versions when transcribing the plates, she works in mysterious ways. 3. Joe mentally switched in the incorrect version because he was so familiar with the bad translations.

      Mormons prefer option 3. But the book of Mormon is still the inerrant inspired word of God, despite any errors.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    194. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can not see that telling the truth in simple every day words could reflect good on the community?

    195. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Words matter. It's entirely possible to be honest without being crass...quote>

      But what's the fun of it?

    196. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wha wha wha. Meanwhile today..why are you creeps so against gay people and think blacks are inferior?

    197. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by tqk · · Score: 1

      Bright or not, that would be caving to alleged mormon influence, as in "don't piss us off or we will hurt you"

      Get the fuck off my lawn before I shoot you.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    198. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by tqk · · Score: 1

      It's not really that surprising that he's blunt and outspoken.

      That may be the understatement of all time. Linus pulls no punches. I wonder how his wife manages to deal with him. I love the guy, but holy crap, reading kernel devel stuff is scary at times.

      Torvalds vs. Cox, death match, with Tanenbaum cheering from the sidelines!!!111

      $dmr nods from the afterlife (sadly).

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    199. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by tqk · · Score: 1

      If they have a problem with being called batshit crazy, then they should stop acting batshit crazy.

      Ya know, I tell people that all the time. It doesn't do any good. Nobody wants to hear the truth.

      I can lift 300 lbs over my head and still, nobody likes me! Well maybe you're a dick?

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    200. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by shentino · · Score: 1

      Half of those excuses are just people being bigoted against mormons, but the other half look like complaints about actual mormons being elitist against non members.

      There is a difference between the two, namely in who is being the jerk. It is wise not to confuse the two.

    201. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by shentino · · Score: 1

      My statement stands regardless of which religion is doing it though.

    202. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by shentino · · Score: 1

      If you read closer, my statement was qualified as a response to a previous statement that was conditional.

    203. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      No, I read that. That's where the word "allegedly" came into play.

      Your post never actually made an accusation. This is true. I never said that it did. What it did to was make a strong insinuation.

      I was pointing out how rude it had been. I still hope it was unintentional, but it was entirely uncalled for, as framed.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    204. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      European conservatives and American conservatives are no different. They're both racist.

      Please engage brain before commenting. (Oh, wait. This is Slashdot.)

      History shows the Republican Party was started because the Dems were Pro-Slavery and were successfully pushing it into the free states (violating state sovereignty). Following the Civil War, they tried to pass Civil rights bills, but overwhelming majority of Dems voted them down. Dems started the KKK. Federal powers expanded because local authorities looked the other way on racial discrimination. Not just Black-White Racism -- discrimination against Irish, Poles and more. A significant percentage of KKK lynching victims were white. Chinese Exclusion Act passed following the Civil War. This continued into the 20th century. Calvin Coolidge tried to pass a Civil Rights Bill, but Dems blocked it. Later, Ike tried and failed. alGore's father filibustered against Civil rights. LBJ signed a Bill, but followed it with his Grand Society -- creating a huge "Plantation."
      Until the 1960's, the overwhelming majority of African Americans voted Republican. Ever hear of Martin Luther King Jr? He was a Republican.
      In his famous speech, he dreamed of a day when his children would not be judge by their skin color, but by their character. Nowadays, affirmative action makes skin color even more important. At the same time, media tells us character is not important for politicians and/or criminals.

      But, hey, don't take my word for all this. Look it up.

    205. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most ironic thing is that atheism has become the new hate.

      It's a fairly common character weakness to want to blame the world's ills on some "other" - on a group of faceless caricatures who differ from the "us" in some arbitrary way. The world's ills are the fault of the black, the jew, the brown immigrant, the arab, the gay, the muslim, the theist and/or THE ATHIEST

      FTFY.

    206. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Romney is in fact, a fucking moron. Therefore saying that Romney is a fucking moron is correct.

    207. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you give me a quote by Romney that would show that he is not a fucking moron?

    208. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please spare us the persecution complex.

    209. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still doesn't change the fact that they are "batshit crazy".

    210. Re:idiotic politically correct fears indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, comparing US conservatives to national socialists is so twisted and perverted only democratc can mentally accept it. 90% of democratic arguments against romney are lies. They just hate capitalism, that makes them socialists and NSDAP was right wing socialist party. They seem to embrace collectivism not individualism its just backward oriented but they call themselves progressives calling every one else a racist and bigot. Its like bunch of kids that like the idea of being in favor of something just because its progressive without actually realizing they shoot themselves in the foot. To those that are affraid of rich people I would recommend one book: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Science_of_Getting_Rich

  29. Parent *is* a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Romney was not being serious, linked video and whatnot

    1. Re:Parent *is* a moron by sturle · · Score: 1

      Romney was not being serious, linked video and whatnot

      Is this a joke as well? Let me quote:

      For example, his “Utility MACT” rule is purportedly aimed at reducing mercury pollution, yet the EPA estimates that the rule will cost $10 billion to reduce mercury pollution by only $6 million (with an “m”).

      It is very clear that Romney doesn't know what mercury is. Why do you think he knows what air pressure is? It's science, you know. Poison for the minds of religious fanatics. When it is so obvious he didn't follow the normal science curriculum in school, he should be very careful when joking about it, If it was a joke.

  30. My 2 cents by thammoud · · Score: 1

    Linus is a brilliant asshole and Romney is an incompetent Moron.

    1. Re:My 2 cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you mean to say incompetent "Mormon"?

    2. Re:My 2 cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      assholes have a very high tendency to get shit done. (period), incompetent morons are pains in the ass.
      It's sad that it takes a foreigner to state the truth (even though he may have been naturalized)

    3. Re:My 2 cents by poly_pusher · · Score: 3, Funny

      You misspelled Mormon...

    4. Re:My 2 cents by Holi · · Score: 1

      no he didn't

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    5. Re:My 2 cents by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Linus is a brilliant asshole and Romney is an incompetent Mormon.

      Fixed that for ya, according to Linus, at least.

      Personally, I think calling Mormons "batshit insane" makes about as much sense as calling someone who thinks a potato is God insane when everyone else worships a tomato.

      Though I also don't think Romney is incompetent or a moron, he's very smart and has been extremely successful in everything he's done. He just has morals and opinions which are contrary to the general welfare of the majority of the US population, and doesn't seem to care about that discrepancy. i.e. he's a Republican...

    6. Re:My 2 cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Torvalds is competent within his field and has managed Linux kernel development pretty effectively. I would not call him brilliant. Bill Joy, yes. Dennis Ritchie, yes. Torvalds, no. I do agree with your assessment of his temperament.

  31. Apparently They Think This Might Deter New Users by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

    "does such outspokenness on non-technical matters reflect poorly on the Linux community that Torvalds leads?"

    Every member of the Linux community checks to see what Linus is wearing before getting dressed in the morning, right? No? Then why are you asking such an apparently stupid question?

    I assume it was from this part of the "article":

    In the comments on that Google+ post, David Stilson, an IT professional from San Diego writes: "I am surprised to see all of these visceral attacks on Romney and each other. When did all the Linux nerds lose their logical approach to problem solving? People install Linux in part due to the fact that they are joining a community of supportive users. If you were new to Linux would you install it after reading these posts?"

    Luckily for new Linux users, they don't have to go to Linus' Google+ page nor do they have to read through random comments on it to download a distribution of Linux. Furthermore people who participate in open source are still, believe it or not, allowed to be humans! (crazy, I know)

    I'm sure if you read all of Steve Ballmer's personal e-mails and political statements you could say something equally vapid about Windows and all Microsoft products.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  32. Some points by grouchomarxist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some points:

    1. All religion is bats**t crazy. Mormonism is just bats**t crazy with nuts on top.

    2. Linus is probably one of the most important figures in the technology industry during the last 20 years or so. Because of that he is a public figure, so like Romney his offhand statements are bound to be criticized, analyzed, etc. He's much less of a public figure than most politicians so he probably isn't used to this as much, but I guess he'll have to. However, he's not a politician, he's a technical leader, so I think people *should* lay off analyzing such comments.

    3. Linus is known for speaking his mind and being somewhat harsh. I don't think Linux would have happened otherwise. However, compared to RMS, Linus is a real gentleman.

    1. Re:Some points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with nuts on top.

      Are they allowed to use a Nutcracker, or is this already consideret technology?

    2. Re:Some points by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

      "However, compared to RMS, Linus is a real gentleman."

      In public, yes. We've heard enough "horror stories" about RMS losing his cool at some public event, while most photos and videos I've seen of Linus show him with an idiotic smile plastered on his face, a seemingly really fun guy to be with. The problem is Linus tends to "write" out his mind. Read RMS's angstiest writings. He never calls anyone batshit moronic, although he's called the members of Congress, "congresscritters".

      And why pick on Mormons, who've never, as far as I can tell, been known to blow up people they disagree with?

    3. Re:Some points by kenorland · · Score: 1

      Linus is probably one of the most important figures in the technology industry during the last 20 years or so

      True, but so is Bill Gates. Just because their products are popular doesn't mean that they are technically good.

      I have respect for Linus's C coding skills and persistence, and I am thankful for his hard work. On pretty much all other issues, I think he is himself what he accused Romney to be.

    4. Re:Some points by osu-neko · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And why pick on Mormons, who've never, as far as I can tell, been known to blow up people they disagree with?

      Not having a propensity to blow themselves and other people up with them is a nice attribute, and Mormons are, on average, among the nicest people I've ever known. That doesn't alter the fact that a lot of what they believe is batshit-crazy, above and beyond the usual batshit-craziness of religions in general. Full disclosure: I am an ex-Mormon...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    5. Re:Some points by Portal1 · · Score: 2

      No they just murdered some colonists caravans in the early days, that planned to live in the same region they picked, after been kicked out of some two cities for being to radical.
      Some history, they rather like to forget.
      I know it has been a long time ago, and likely is not going to happen anytime soon/again.

      --
      There are no stupid questions, Just a lot of inquisitive idiots. (from a good friend)
    6. Re:Some points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why pick on Mormons, who've never, as far as I can tell, been known to blow up people they disagree with?

      Then these folks had it coming to them, right?

      Mountain Meadows Massacre

    7. Re:Some points by spauldo · · Score: 2

      You're thinking amish. Mormons can use technology just fine, they just can't wear miniskirts.

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
    8. Re:Some points by spauldo · · Score: 2

      And why pick on Mormons, who've never, as far as I can tell, been known to blow up people they disagree with?

      Every* religion has its fanatics, but they don't all blow people up. They might kill you (Christian fanatics vs. abortion doctors), wage a war on you (catholic vs. protestant in Northern Ireland, Shia-Sunni conflicts), take away your rights (Christian fanatics with blue laws, countries with Islamic law), or force their ideas onto you and your children (Intelligent Design, Hamas' anti-Jewish children's shows). Mormon fanatics are the ones that still practice polygamy and force young girls into marriage.

      Normal Mormons of course are just regular people with some strange beliefs, but really, most of the strangeness was already in Christianity anyway (God created a huge, vast universe with uncountable stars and planets, with relativistic and quantum effects, and he really gives a shit who you like to poke your dick into?). I find it easier to believe that some guy found some gold plates and transcribed them than to believe that the word of God has passed down thousands of years without anyone tampering with it for their own benefit.

      *OK, I've never met a pastafarian fanatic, but it's possible. I am curious what a Buddhist fanatic would be like.

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
    9. Re:Some points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only because their murderous days came before the invention of dynamite.

    10. Re:Some points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In their partial defense, how many Mormons do you think *really* wake up every morning and go through tier day fixated about Joseph Smith's artifacts, Moroni, or the weirder aspects of Mormonism? I'd venture a guess that it's about the same percentage as the number of Roman Catholics who wake up every morning and consciously spend their day fixated upon virgin birth, bread and wine somehow being God's flesh and blood despite having no scientifically-detectable change, or the ratio of Jews who really, truly believe Moses conversed with a burning bush and personally parted the red sea. Or, for that matter, the number of Scientologists who really believe Xenu transported bodies to earth in spaceships that looked like B-52 bombers.

      Every religion has wacky, dark corners where nobody really wants to dig too hard because it's just too... weird... even for the most devout believers who are nevertheless unafflicted by mild schizophrenia. It's not a huge exaggeration to say that most American Catholics basically view the bible as a work of inspired fiction, and are largely indifferent to theological matters in general. They don't challenge the Pope's views about Mary's virginity, because they don't particularly *care* one way or another. They might think they'll go to hell for accidentally eating a Big Mac on Friday during Lent, and they might let their parents twist their arms into dragging the kids to church on Easter & Christmas, but that's pretty much the extent of their religious beliefs.

      Mainstream Mormons aren't all that different. Most of them rarely think about religion at all, especially the ones who grew up and live in Utah. To them, Mormonism is cultural background noise that defines their outlook in subtle and not-so-subtle ways, but mostly it's just the way things are, and Mormons from Utah who move elsewhere get pretty traumatized when it starts to sink in that most people think beliefs they've always just kind of taken for granted are wacky and weird.

    11. Re:Some points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.Says the guy who absolutely knows how the earth was created, how long it will last, and where we will all go when we're done (not mormon, but the arrogance is very annoying). I don't know the answers to those questions, our scientists have been studying it for years and can't agree on what the answers even might be, but you can stand up and state what you did with such a degree of certainty as to remove all doubt? Pbbt.

      2.Linus puts his pants on one leg at a time like the rest of us. His great claim to fame is that he wrote a kernel to emulate unix, mailed it to some friends and it took off like wild fire. Don't get me wrong it's a great system. I love it. I use it. But it seems some people want to elevate him to diety status, and in reality he's going to get old and have a wrinkled ass like everyone else. He's entitled to have his own opinions and state them with as much (or as little) class as he chooses.

      3.A working class drunk gentleman maybe?

    12. Re:Some points by bobaferret · · Score: 1

      You should check this out

      Obviously modern mormans aren't this bad.... But they definatly have done some aweful things over the years. Of course, what religion hasn't?

    13. Re:Some points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All religion is bats**t crazy.

      I heartily disagree, and here's why. While I'm a devout Christian, I acknowledge that there are fundamental human truths found in most religions. For example, the golden rule ("Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"). How about don't murder, don't steal, respect those wiser than you, "in this world you will have troubles",... the list would go on nearly endlessly. Sure, there are elements of religion that are seemingly unbelievable (insert your favorite aetheistic uneducated reference to random Old Testament scriptures where someone dies in a seemingly unjust way), but to say that all of the sensible aspects of religion are moot (or bats**t crazy) because you don't believe or agree with a few of the other more "extravagent" points is a very black-and-white worldview. Also, I should mention that your concept of "crazy" or "sane" is predicated on a concept of "good" and "bad" or "right" and "wrong", which require a belief in a Moral Law that cannot exist if the universe is really just chaotic atoms and nothing else. So you called religion crazy based on your inward morals which you've derived from something spiritual. Don't deny it.

      You know what sounds bats**t crazy? "...only on the firm foundation of unyielding despair, can the soul's habitation be safely built" - Bertrand Russell. Now that's crazy, because it acknowledges a soul in an aetheistic argument.

    14. Re:Some points by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      And why pick on Mormons, who've never, as far as I can tell, been known to blow up people they disagree with?

      I guess Mark Hofmann didn't get the memo.

      --

      Enigma

    15. Re:Some points by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

      Okay, they've done some crazy shit in the past. But like you said, all religions and ideologies, even nominally peaceful ones, have done terrible things in the name of their beliefs, possibly with the exception of the Jains (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jainism)

  33. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like it might reflect poorly on the Linux community if, you know, he were wrong.

  34. Re:Romney *is* a moron by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Allowing aircraft windows to be opened is recipe for disaster, pressure and whatnot.

    I've opened the window on a plane. I've even opened the door on a plane. If you are at a low enough altitude, it doesn't matter. Of course, I was on a plane that probably wouldn't make it to an altitude that is unsafe, but it was an aircraft and opening them was not a recipe for disaster. The damn thing had air vents!

    I don't ask Romney to fix kernel bugs just as I don't look to Linux for political advice. Both should stick to what they know.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  35. Unicorns, Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny by Bananatree3 · · Score: 0

    All religion is "batshit crazy", from a strictly rational, hard scientific perspective.

    And why does some random political G+ comment by Linus make Slashdot front page?

    1. Re:Unicorns, Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      And why does some random political G+ comment by Linus make Slashdot front page?

      Because Slashdot is batshit crazy.

  36. The idea isn't so crazy. by BMOC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is not unusual for emergency exit doors over wings to have windows in them. It is not unusual for normal boarding doors to have windows in them. There is nothing in engineering or science that precludes the idea of an airliner with pressure-rated window-doors that have an arm-able open for passengers. The only thing preventing aircraft designers from doing this is expense and weight. There's no reason it couldn't be done, just like there's no reason airbags couldn't be installed to prevent passenger injuries in crashes. At some point you make engineering tradeoffs. Romney isn't crazy for suggesting this. But an airplane manufacturer might be crazy to build one.

    --
    I swear they give me mod points to shut me up.
    1. Re:The idea isn't so crazy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait what? With minus 20 degree celcius, winds up to 800 km/h and a considerable lower pressure then in the aircraft and air that cannot be breathed and you think its a good plausible idea to build windows that can be opened?

    2. Re:The idea isn't so crazy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Airliner cockpit windows can be opened in flight.

    3. Re:The idea isn't so crazy. by BMOC · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about opening them in flight? The fact is, you could, in theory, put pressure-rated-window-doors all along the side of every airliner. No need to open them in flight, bailing-out at altitude isn't what anyone was suggesting. What was suggested was being able to simply blow out a side of the aircraft after a crash. In this way you could make any portion of the hull an escape route in the event you survived a crash. This relieves congestion, and makes it much easier for evacuation from a burning plane on the ground.

      --
      I swear they give me mod points to shut me up.
  37. To people who think clearly by MpVpRb · · Score: 1

    Romney is a politician who will say anything to get elected

    To people who hate Democrats

    He's the guy running against the Democrat..or as my father used to call them "dummy-craps"

    BTW, I am a registered Democrat

    1. Re:To people who think clearly by Seeteufel · · Score: 1

      Make the parrot say: I will migrate the Federal Government to GNU/Linux.

    2. Re:To people who think clearly by spauldo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He's not really talking to people who hate Democrats anymore. He did that during the primary.

      Now he's talking to independent voters who don't vote straight party ticket. People who hate Democrats are going to vote for him no matter what he says.

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
    3. Re:To people who think clearly by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      He's not really talking to people who hate Democrats anymore. He did that during the primary.

      Now he's talking to independent voters who don't vote straight party ticket. People who hate Democrats are going to vote for him no matter what he says.

      No, he'll continue to talk to the people who hate Democrats. The election is not just about getting the undecided voters, but getting even the decided voters to not only get up and go vote on election day, but getting them to give money to help convince undecideds to vote for him as well as convincing the decideds to get out and vote. The trouble is that saying what you need to in order to get the people already on your side to actually cast that vote can often cause an undecided to go out and vote for the other guy to spite you.

      I never voted for Obama. I voted against Bush, only to find out that it really didn't matter that much in the areas I cared about.

    4. Re:To people who think clearly by spauldo · · Score: 1

      His message will be why people should hate Democrats, and why they should vote Republican. That message works for both the people who hate Democrats already (to keep them excited about voting) and the independants who haven't decided. As far as the content of the message, the independants are key, since he really just needs the political equivalent of pep rallies to keep the Republicans voting for him.

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
  38. Um, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Romney was not talking about opening windows in flight. He was concerning about passengers getting enough oxygen during a fire inflight. Read the original quotations.

    This is just an example of public figures like Linus using half-baked sources like the Huffington Post as commentary. Linus Torvalds just dropped several notches in my book for not looking up the source.

    1. Re:Um, no by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      Romney was not talking about opening windows in flight. He was concerning about passengers getting enough oxygen during a fire inflight. Read the original quotations.

      This is just an example of public figures like Linus using half-baked sources like the Huffington Post as commentary. Linus Torvalds just dropped several notches in my book for not looking up the source.

      So, how dumb is it to introduce fresh oxygen to a fire? Fail on all counts.

    2. Re:Um, no by tftp · · Score: 1

      Linus Torvalds just dropped several notches in my book for not looking up the source.

      I'm sure Anonymous Coward was never in Linus's book to begin with.

      Besides, how would a thorough researcher sustain a friendly talk among close friends? "Hey, AC, you heard that $team won yesterday, what do you think?" -- "Listen, guys, I can't say a word about that for about three days, until I personally review all the tapes and read all the articles. I may need to visit the stadium and look around too." Wouldn't that style be a tad boring for an idle chat?

    3. Re:Um, no by dbIII · · Score: 2

      He's obviously never sat through one of those pre-flight things where the airline stewardesses tell you about the oxygen masks that drop down.
      Just another example of a wantabee Feudal Lord that is out of touch with the common rabble that can't afford their own Learjet.

    4. Re:Um, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So, how dumb is it to introduce fresh oxygen to a fire? Fail on all counts.

      It depends partly upon whose well-being you're talking about. For somebody about to suffocate within the next 5 seconds, but who might survive if he can squirm through the window before the flames blocking the exit can burn him alive, it's a smart act of self-preservation. For the 47 other passengers who'll be killed 6 seconds after the flames explode and surge towards the window, it's very bad. Context is everything.

    5. Re:Um, no by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      So, how dumb is it to introduce fresh oxygen to a fire? Fail on all counts.

      Umm, when you're part of the fuel and would like to not be part of the fuel... it's not so dumb.

  39. Figureheads by poity · · Score: 1

    Should keep their religious beliefs and their politics to themselves. For politicians, the latter is impossible, but the former should still apply. (that's why Republicans are somewhat more repulsive in this regard).

    But, this is really a non-story in any case, neither Torvald's political opinions nor Romney's assessment of airplane windows should matter to us. (I mean if Clinton's assessment of blowjobs didn't affect his ability to act as President, then surely Romney's assessment of airplane windows couldn't either.)

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    1. Re:Figureheads by Son+of+Byrne · · Score: 1

      Should keep their religious beliefs and their politics to themselves.

      I'm sorry, but the right to an opinion isn't bound by your position in society whether it is greater or less than anyone else.

      --
      I'd happily pay you Tuesday for a biopsy today!
    2. Re:Figureheads by Hardhead_7 · · Score: 1

      But, this is really a non-story in any case, neither Torvald's political opinions nor Romney's assessment of airplane windows should matter to us

      Wait, you seriously think it doesn't matter if the most powerful man in America is aware of something as basic as pressurized cabins in airplanes? I mean, don't we want the President to be, you know, smart?

  40. Re:Ask Mark Twain about calling a thing by its nam by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's no more crazy than any other religion. Once you cross the magic man in the sky line, the other differences are trivial.

  41. Seriously? by Improbus · · Score: 1

    Linus is just saying what we are all thinking. The truth shall set you free.

  42. Re:Romney *is* a moron by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

    In later news, it was announced that Bain Capital was opening a window-screen factory for aircraft in China.

    bats**t crazy comes standard with religions. Why should Romney's be any different?

  43. Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linus who???

    Stick to kernel dev man, you will be much better off there than as a political pundit for sure.

  44. I would not be surprised if he got death threats by Dan667 · · Score: 0

    some of these conservatives don't even realize they act just like the extremist muslims.

  45. Poorly by dugancent · · Score: 0

    While I completely agree with him (Linus). Profanity is a tool of a weak mind.

    --
    SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
    1. Re:Poorly by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      The idea that some words are magic and will send you to hell are reflective of childish thought.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    2. Re:Poorly by Xenx · · Score: 1

      Fuck you, I'm plenty smart!

    3. Re:Poorly by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No it fucking isn't. It's a tool to provide emphasis - for instance compare "that may be damaged" to "it's fucked". It's difficult to get a group of welders to understand how serious a situation is without using profanity.

    4. Re:Poorly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off, you asshole motherfucker!

  46. Oh Linus by sexconker · · Score: 0

    "Or does such outspokenness on non-technical matters reflect poorly on the Linux community that Torvalds leads?"

    It's been nearly a decade since Linus Torvalds actually led the Linux community.
    And this is a good thing for the Linux community.

  47. Linus vs. Romney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linus does not get Mormon humor.

  48. Official Statement of the Open Source Community by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the Official Statement of the Open Source Community: The Open Source community is amorphous, and follows no leader. Thus, nobody is capable of making an Official Statement for the Open Source Community. This has been an Official Statement of the Open Source Comunity.

    1. Re:Official Statement of the Open Source Community by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 2

      May be he should add a footer to all his posts. "All opinions expressed are my own, and are not representative of the Linux/Open source community"

    2. Re:Official Statement of the Open Source Community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disclaimer? Why? The man herds cats for a living. Throwing a boot at another noisy idiot in the alley is just SOP. Know of any other cat herders around here that don't throw boots with some regularity?

    3. Re:Official Statement of the Open Source Community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But everyone can have an opinion on this "story," which is why it was posted.

      -st

    4. Re:Official Statement of the Open Source Community by jatoo · · Score: 1

      "All opinions expressed are my own, and are not representative of the Linux/Open source community. And if you didn't realise that already, you're a fucking moron!"

    5. Re:Official Statement of the Open Source Community by sjames · · Score: 1

      People should be able to guess that based on using his personal Google+ page rather than kernel.org to make the remark.

    6. Re:Official Statement of the Open Source Community by Bazman · · Score: 1

      In other important geek news: Bruce Perens Still Reading Slashdot.

    7. Re:Official Statement of the Open Source Community by lexa1979 · · Score: 1

      You liar ! you can't be someone from the Open Source Community... Open Source Community makes OpenOfficial Statements.

    8. Re:Official Statement of the Open Source Community by sturle · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't be appropriate in this case. I think his comment is representative of the Linux/Open source community.

    9. Re:Official Statement of the Open Source Community by 3vi1 · · Score: 1

      You do realize that FOX News is going to quote you and credit you as The Official Spokesman for The Open Source Community, right?

    10. Re:Official Statement of the Open Source Community by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      That would piss off some people that I'd really like to piss off.

    11. Re:Official Statement of the Open Source Community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the Official Statement of the Open Source Community: The Open Source community is amorphous, and follows no leader. Thus, nobody is capable of making an Official Statement for the Open Source Community. This has been an Official Statement of the Open Source Comunity.

      Maybe true, but when the creator of the Linux kernel, the greatest operating system since Unix makes statements like that, it is tied to the Linux community whether we want it to be or not.

    12. Re:Official Statement of the Open Source Community by speederaser · · Score: 1

      This is the Official Statement of the Open Source Community: The Open Source community is amorphous, and follows no leader. Thus, nobody is capable of making an Official Statement for the Open Source Community. This has been an Official Statement of the Open Source Comunity.

      The Open Source Community may know and understand that, but I don't think you can count on the outside world to give a damn how the Open Source Community is or is not organized.

      Splash damage accrues to those with even the most tenuous relationship. When you bring subjects like politics or religion into it people react with emotion, not rational thought. The trailer to a badly produced, obnoxious movie is released and Americans who clearly had nothing to do with it are killed.

      Like it or not, what Linus said will splash onto all of us in The Open Source Community (typing this on my Fedora box).

    13. Re:Official Statement of the Open Source Community by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      You can see from something else I wrote that I do value spokespeople who stay on message. I don't kid myself that I can expect that sort of maturity out of some of our best-known spokespeople, though.

  49. Mere profanity versus ad hominem by macraig · · Score: 1

    Using a single cussword doesn't completely invalidate a criticism, if in fact it really is just a terse critique. What does invalidate it is ad hominem. Since the cusswords at issue in Linus' comments were adjectives for the words "moron" and "crazy", which pretty obviously are ad hominem, the profanity is really irrelevant. It's odd that everyone is obsessed with the profanity and cares nothing about the ad hominem that it delivered.

    1. Re:Mere profanity versus ad hominem by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      The argument isn't about whether Romney is correct or not, it's about whether he's fit to be the President of the United States of America. A crazy moron really shouldn't be in that position (again) so it's not an ad hominem attack in the context of the political debate. In the context of a discussion about aircraft design it is an ad hominem.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    2. Re:Mere profanity versus ad hominem by Q-Hack! · · Score: 1

      The argument isn't about whether Romney is correct or not, it's about whether he's fit to be the President of the United States of America. A crazy moron really shouldn't be in that position (again) so it's not an ad hominem attack in the context of the political debate. In the context of a discussion about aircraft design it is an ad hominem.

      If you are suggesting that Romney's statement about airplane windows makes him a complete moron, then it is an ad hominem attack as it has been shown that he was joking.

      If you are suggesting that Romney's religion makes him a complete moron, then I would remind you that President Obama also believes in a magic ghost in the sky.

      --
      Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
    3. Re:Mere profanity versus ad hominem by pla · · Score: 1

      It's odd that everyone is obsessed with the profanity and cares nothing about the ad hominem that it delivered.

      I feel quite a lot more concerned that the potential next president of the US believes in magic underwear (not a joke, look it up!), than I do about whether or not a typical antisocial geek not running for any public office managed to say something a little too bluntly.

      But hey, look at the alternative... Four more years of - Hmm... Well... What has Barry done, other than get a crippled version of Romneycare applied nationwide? Wow. Way to stick it to your opponent, the creator of your greatest accomplishment to date.


      / "If everyone wasted their vote on [Johnson] [he] would be the next president"

    4. Re:Mere profanity versus ad hominem by macraig · · Score: 1

      What you suggest is neither a rational nor sensible way to discredit a President candidate as unfit for the role. Calling a candidate a crazy moron and then making no effort to even describe in detail why is not even adult behavior, it's juvenile. As I said previously, it's ad hominem. Wikipedia defines it in some detail.

    5. Re:Mere profanity versus ad hominem by macraig · · Score: 1

      Yes, let's all resort to juvenile, emotional, hyperbolic name-calling, then make no reasoned arguments at all to follow it. Let's make sure we ignore and apologize for everyone that does it to the candidates we don't like and cry foul only when it's done to the candidate we lionize. That will surely help our electoral process.

    6. Re:Mere profanity versus ad hominem by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      If you are suggesting that Romney's religion makes him a complete moron, then I would remind you that President Obama also believes in a magic ghost in the sky.

      People slimed John F. Kennedy for his religion much the same as they are Romney. Kennedy was a Roman Catholic, and in fact the first Roman Catholic ever elected President.

      It is so disappointing to see the way a man's religion is used to slime him by supposedly 'open minded, progressive' types.

    7. Re:Mere profanity versus ad hominem by pla · · Score: 1

      Let's make sure we ignore and apologize for everyone that does it to the candidates we don't like and cry foul only when it's done to the candidate we lionize.

      Sadly, no one even bothers insulting the third party candidates.


      That will surely help our electoral process.

      Only two things will "help our electoral process" - Finding a way to ban private funding of campaigns, and switching to something like IRV that makes it possible to vote for third parties without throwing away your vote completely.

      Whether or not one (even popular) geek calls a candidate a poopy-head amounts to worrying about a drop of piss in a pond of raw sewage.

    8. Re:Mere profanity versus ad hominem by macraig · · Score: 1

      Sadly, no one even bothers insulting the third party candidates.

      People don't want their heartfelt insults to be wasted.

      Only two things will "help our electoral process"....

      You left out random selection, which will give us superior candidates 99% of the time. The other 1% is when we randomly get... well, the same One Percenters we get now. Maybe we can set a cap on income for the random selection.

  50. Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, there's no arrogance like that of an uninformed nerd. As a type-rated pilot (turboprops), I can tell you even pressurized planes do have windows, and partially for this purpose.

  51. This is asinine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're seriously asking whether anything a guy says reflects poorly on all individuals that use an operating system?

  52. Ring the dinner bell for all the liberal trolls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I mean the totally rational, very scientific- and evidence-minded Slashdot posters. *Ahem*

  53. it cuts both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Is this just Linus being Linus? Or does such outspokenness on non-technical matters reflect poorly on the Linux community that Torvalds leads?"

    Let me ask, is the fact that OP is a stuck up priggish asshole wasting out time just netbuzz being netbuzz or does thowing a hissy fit over a non-technical matter reflect poorly on the whole slashdot community?

  54. If he becomes president... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then 2012 apocalypse is for real... lol

    If all candidates are incompetent, choose the one that is most open minded. We don't need to go back to the dark ages.

  55. Land Of The Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linus moved to America just so he can have this type of freedom of speech.

    In his native country he could be jailed for such talk.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=Finland+freedom+speech

  56. Let the profanity continue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Political correctness and corporate organisational conformity is a mutilation of the human psyche: let the "profanity" continue. If it reflects badly on the community so be it. I can't see how anyone in a free society would prefer censorship to a bad reputation.

  57. great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm very pleased with Linus's comments even if they won't be taken well, we just need more known people to say stuff like that and maybe the crazies who believe in Mitt Romney will start listening

  58. Re:Ask Mark Twain about calling a thing by its nam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, there's also a magic underwear line.

  59. Re:Romney *is* a moron by line-bundle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What does Romney know about political advice?

  60. Grown man says "fuck" on social site no one uses. by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And then apologizes the next day because the idiot on MSNBC got it wrong.

    And we wonder why politicians never speak their minds about anything under any circumstances.

    --

    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

  61. Seriously by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I think you may have gotten it wrong. From my understanding, Linus was stating a well-established fact -- that Romney is a fucking mor[m]on. Simple typo; he knows genius when he sees it.

    --
    Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
    1. Re:Seriously by SolitaryMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or fucking [a] mor[m]on, i.e. just pointing out that Romney has a healthy sexual relationships with his wife, who is also a mormon. SImple mistake.

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    2. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I think you may have gotten it wrong. From my understanding, Linus was stating a well-established fact -- that Romney is a fucking mor[m]on. Simple typo; he knows genius when he sees it.

      I wonder what you nerds would say if he said this about obama, hmmmm

    3. Re:Seriously by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Obama is very intelligent. I don't expect anyone to know something about everything, so I pardon him for simple errors. His biggest blooper seems to be his cavalier investment in the short-term memories of Americans. Turns out there was 'a killing' to be made, but they weren't as short as he assumed; Americans still remember the things he said long ago, and they are mighty confused whilst they hear what he says today. If Obama makes a stupid statement, just as I would if he made a genuinely funny one, I'd wonder only what he was trying to deceive us about. However, since Obama is not a fucking mor[m]on, my best guess is that I'd be modded as Offtopic and nothing would be said.

      You might consider that there are some people out there who are sick of being electoral ping-pong serfs. Personally, I'd like to see them both volunteer for the first expedition to Mars -- I'd vote for that!. This election is like being mugged by two thugs; they say to hit the biggest one first, but to me, these guys seem like ugly twins, with very different personalities.

      --
      Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
    4. Re:Seriously by sturle · · Score: 1

      Depends if he his right or not. Obama isn't a mormon (my spell checker wants to correct that to moron) as far as I know, so at least I would tell Linus to do better research.

    5. Re:Seriously by EMN13 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I think you may have gotten it wrong. From my understanding, Linus was stating a well-established fact -- that Romney is a fucking mor[m]on. Simple typo; he knows genius when he sees it.

      Or fucking [a] mor[m]on, i.e. just pointing out that Romney has a healthy sexual relationships with his wife, who is also a mormon. SImple mistake.

      Dude... that's just priceless :-D

  62. I am no longer going to be voting for Linus Torval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When is the next election? He's really done it to himself this time.

  63. Re:Is this any worse than RMS? by Ironchew · · Score: 1

    I heard that Stallman once killed a girl in 1990 (He never specifically denied it.) This reflects very poorly on Linus as a FOSS contributor.

  64. What community by robot5x · · Score: 1

    I'd just like to know what Bill Gates would have to say about this, and how everyone thinks this would reflect on the Windows community.
    Furthermore, I think I'd have to cut off all ties completely with the Yahoo community if Marissa Mayer were to join in this debate!
    I wait with bated breath.

    --
    Hej! Nasi tu byli!
  65. Apologies not appropriate, says the Romney camp by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mr. Romney himself has said: "It's a terrible course for America to stand in apology for its values." Thus, no doubt he would condemn Mr. Torvalds apology as "appeasing our enemies".

    1. Re:Apologies not appropriate, says the Romney camp by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 1

      You have a good and valid point there sir.
      Also, as we all know Linus Torvalds is well known for appeasing his enemies. :)

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
    2. Re:Apologies not appropriate, says the Romney camp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Linus (Mr. Torvalds to you) isn't American. Therefore, it is just one of those quaint European customs, really.

    3. Re:Apologies not appropriate, says the Romney camp by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      But Linus (Mr. Torvalds to you) isn't American. Therefore, it is just one of those quaint European customs, really.

      Except that he IS an American, he lives in the United States and obtained US citizenship in 2010.

      --

      Enigma

    4. Re:Apologies not appropriate, says the Romney camp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to see Romney on the news very often to realize his humor is very dry. He also doesn't come off as an idiot, even if he doesn't know as much about physics as Linus. Personally, I don't care how dry his humor is; we've had nearly four years of the most charismatic empty suit you could find, and I'm just not impressed with the results over that time. Not impressed at all.

    5. Re:Apologies not appropriate, says the Romney camp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather live next to a Mormon than a nigger.

  66. Bill Nye by stevegee58 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't hear Bill Nye being a pussy and apologizing for calling it like it is.
    He called a sitting US Congressman a "fucking idiot" for his pseudo-scientific beliefs and followers of creationism "fucking retarded".
    Run for President, Bill. We need you.

    1. Re:Bill Nye by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      As a man of reason I would expect someone like Bill Nye to employ pragmatism as administrator of the US Federal Government. As such I would expect that he would be as imperfect as my other picks for president (Obama included).

      Take the Tax cut debacle. Many liberals wish Obama had stuck to his guns--but the alternative was an intractable opponent which would have happily allowed unemployment insurance to run out. As long as the world is full of people who present no-win scenarios I expect every president to make pragmatic and often imperfect decisions that may very well be the best choice available.

      Take Syria. We could intervene in Syria but then Russia would get involved. The Syrian conflict sucks but there is not good solution only a choice between bad ones. That's the president's real job... choosing between bad options. Because that's how life goes.

    2. Re:Bill Nye by artor3 · · Score: 1

      I would vote for him in a heartbeat. Unfortunately, no sane, intelligent person would try to be President. You have to either be a naive Pollyanna thinking you'll somehow rise above the partisanship, a Machiavellian sociopath willing to put up with anything for power, or a blithering idiot who's simply unaware of the hell you'll be dragged through every day of the campaign, and the further torments that await when everyone uses you as the scapegoat for every single thing that goes wrong.

    3. Re:Bill Nye by ALeavitt · · Score: 2
      --
      This sig has been stolen. Return it to its original user for a reward.
    4. Re:Bill Nye by Frequency+Domain · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't hear Bill Nye being a pussy and apologizing for calling it like it is. He called a sitting US Congressman a "fucking idiot" for his pseudo-scientific beliefs and followers of creationism "fucking retarded".

      Nope. It's a great story, but it didn't happen.

    5. Re:Bill Nye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he didn't. That article was satire.

    6. Re:Bill Nye by scream+at+the+sky · · Score: 1

      I remember hearing about this, but I have never been able to find the claimed footage. Wasn't this debunked as a hoax?

      --
      I wish I was a neutron bomb, for once I could go off...
    7. Re:Bill Nye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This must be representitive of the tolerance I keep hearing so much about. You know where Christians have to be tolerant of everyone else while they suck it up and take all the bashing?

  67. Not useful by gnu-sucks · · Score: 1

    I don't think he's serious about the windows on an aircraft, and anyone who does needs his head examined.

    Having said that, I'm not hiring him to be in charge of aircraft design. Nor am I hiring a religious leader. (Noted because I think mormonism is pretty odd too.)

    We're considering him for a president. I'd rather debate on his policy, record, etc. And I'm not claiming to agree with all of it or think highly of him on these merits, but this is the domain we need to be in, not the "batshit crazy."

    It's easy to attack and make fun of these guys -- nearly all past and present political figures. I enjoy it too. But I don't make decisions based on it.

    1. Re:Not useful by xs650 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ... We're considering him for a president. I'd rather debate on his policy, record, etc. And I'm not claiming to agree with all of it or think highly of him on these merits, but this is the domain we need to be in, not the "batshit crazy." ...

      Romney is the candidate for everyone. No matter what your position is on anything, he has held that position at one time or another..

    2. Re:Not useful by nicoleb_x · · Score: 1

      Just Like Hope and Change. Everybody had some hope for some change. What an all inclusive guy that one.

    3. Re:Not useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Romney is the candidate for everyone. No matter what your position is on anything, he has held that position at one time or another..

      Doggy style for anal sex?

    4. Re:Not useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think he's serious about the windows on an aircraft, and anyone who does needs his head examined.

      He looks like he actually believes what he is saying in the video. He says it with the same kind of expression and intonation that he uses when he accuses the left of supporting wealth redistribution. So, are we to assume that the rest of his policies are also jokes?

          " We may lie with our lips, but we tell the truth with the face we make when we lie." -Friedrich Nietzsche

    5. Re:Not useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think he's serious about the windows on an aircraft, and anyone who does needs his head examined.

      Why?

      An onboard fire is extremely dangerous and generally fatal. In that circumstance, venting air tothe less dense cruising atmosphere is a quick and safe way to extinguish the fire. Once the pax are using oxygen masks, of course.

      Close hatch and repressurise afterwards.

  68. Re:Romney *is* a moron by frosty_tsm · · Score: 2

    I don't ask Romney to fix kernel bugs just as I don't look to Linux for political advice. Both should stick to what they know.

    You imply that Romney is a source for political advice. The current (supposedly left-leaning but maybe not) polls speak otherwise.

  69. Europeans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Europeans are, in general, less sensitive, and have a better sense of humor than Americans. They tend to be both succint and insightful.

    Political correctness on this side of the ocean means that both sides of every issue are often given equal merit when it is not deserved.

    An American journalist, for example, might say that Obama has better foreign policy experience, and that without him the economy might have done slightly worse. A European might say that Romney is clueless about foreign affairs, adding that Republicans completely trashed the economy and Obama reversed much of their damage.

    Linus' European-ness is what I admire about him. Consider also Richard Stallman's bluntness, and how much he offends people because he is always right, even if it takes people 20 years to figure it out.

    1. Re:Europeans by Seeteufel · · Score: 1

      European media is driven by the idea of enlightenment. That means you can't afford to let a crazy or blatanly false claim win. You also cannot attack a medium like Mediamatters which collects batshit crazy statements just because it leans to the left. Factional discourse tops political bias. A lie or untruth does not become true because you agree with a political bias. All sides of the debate have to support their views with facts. You can't support a lie just because it serves your bias or attack a messenger ad hominem. That is against the elite rules of rational discourse and journalists view themselves as guardians of rationalised discourse.

    2. Re:Europeans by Q-Hack! · · Score: 1

      An American journalist, for example, might say that Obama has better foreign policy experience, and that without him the economy might have done slightly worse. A European might say that Romney is clueless about foreign affairs, adding that Republicans completely trashed the economy and Obama reversed much of their damage.

      While the first statement here is debateable, the second would be outright wrong. There are many factors that trashed the economy from both side of the isle. One of the major factors was when President Clinton pushed for all Americans to own a home. Banks at the time were not lending to those they thought coundn't afford a home as they didn't want the risk. President Clinton removed that risk thereby allowing banks to loan high risk people money. The fact that the economy crashed on Bush's watch is irrelivent as it would have happended no matter who was in office. To Bush's credit, he did try to reverse this, but failed with the Democraticaly controled Congress. Unfortunately, very few news orginizations will tell this side of the story. Both parties have thier faults, but by all means, go ahead and join the herd in only blaming Rebuplicans.

      --
      Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
  70. Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So ... if you have anything to tell Romney, just say it the way you like it.

    But if Romney is a Democrat, you sure ain't gonna use colorful descriptions such as "batshit crazy" or "fucking moron", or you will be chastised as "hateful" and whatever you say will be deemed as "hatespeech".

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, the Dems are just being anti-patriotic after their little snafu at the DNC two weeks ago :)

    2. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by bmo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh, I can certainly point out some odious Democrats.

      During the SOPA hearings, I became particularly incensed at Maxine Waters. What a waste of everybody's time she is. She and a most on both sides of the aisle didn't particularly "get" why SOPA was a bad idea. Watt was similarly a waste of oxygen and body heat in that chamber. Only a handful like Polis (D), Lofgren(D), Lungren(R), and Issa (R) and got it. Hell, Polis even understood what the hell Bitcoin, TOR, and Silk Road are. The response on /g/ was "oh god, he knows!"

      --
      BMO

    3. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by causality · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's only hate speech if it's not true.

      Seems like it's most likely to be branded "hate speech" when it is true.

      "Hate speech" is just like the false accusations of "racism" and so on. It's a way to try to shut down the discussion at the point where it'd be appropriate to acknowledge that a valid point has been made. It's a cowardly escape route. It's for childish people who think that disagreeing with somoene makes them THE ENEMY and so admitting when THE ENEMY has made a good point and dealing with it like a mature adult (which, oh my god, might involve changing your own point of view) would mean aiding and abetting THE ENEMY. So clearly that can't be done.

      Some kind of character attack must be made instead, of course with no corresponding burden of proof. I mean "racist" is a pretty damned serious accusation. It's like calling someone a thief -- you better have evidence. But the goal is not to fulfill a burden of proof. It is to shut down the conversation.

      I don't know how it happened but a lot of two-year-olds somehow ended up in adult bodies. Perhaps our scientists should look into this.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    4. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Romney isn't a democrat

      You wouldn't know it by all the favors he's doing for them. His job appears to be to scare people out of voting third party and to get them to stay with the herd and vote for Obama. All indications seems to show it's working pretty well.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      You know this election really sucks. There is no one to vote for and I want to vote against BOTH of the individuals running for President. What a fucking travesty. This is what the damn Repukes and Dumbcrats run out for us to vote for. Please give me someone else. Perot, Paul, hell I'd even take Nader.

    6. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Help! Help! I'm being oppressed!

    7. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may be too young for it, but I can't think of a Democrat who is quite as batshit crazy as a fair number of the GOP members have been lately. I can think of a few who I could potentially describe as "fucking morons", though it doesn't quite have the same depth of validity as it does when lobbed at certain members of the Republican party.

      If someone actually is "batshit crazy" or a "fucking moron", it's pretty hard to call it hatespeech. Regardless, you're welcome to your persecution simplex.

    8. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by garaged · · Score: 0

      Lots of scientist are perpetual childs

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    9. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, the Dems are just being anti-patriotic after their little snafu at the DNC two weeks ago :)

      yeah that empty chair thing was pretty stupid

    10. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by jandersen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seems like it's most likely to be branded "hate speech" when it is true.

      Are you feeling sore or something? There is nothing mysterious about the term "Hate speech" - if the purpose of your speech is to inflame hatred in your audience, then it is hate speech. Of course, it is sometimes a matter of interpretation what the purpose of anybody's words is, but since the purpose of hate speech is to whip up feelings, it will usually be rather short on objectivity while things like accusations and generalisations come thick and fast.

      It is perfectly possible to discuss even serious and difficult problems without inciting hate - one good way would be to start out by seeking out any common ground and looking for reasonable solutions.

      There is an disturbing irony in the fact that the extremists on both sides of any conflict are so often helping each other by polarising the situation - the anti-muslim extremists are very much carrying fuel to the muslim extremists' bonfire, and are in that sense betraying their own people. To an objective person, the real conflict is not between "The Muslims" and "The Christians", but between those in the middle and the extremists on both sides.

      Hmm, I see I have gone OT, sorry about that - but I think what I say is valid in general, and who knows, it may even apply to the subject at hand.

    11. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Celebrities go around spouting politics all the time. They even tell us about the science of vaccines, etc.

      A smart person voices a political opinion and it's a scandal? We should be backing him up, not trying to silence him.

      --
      No sig today...
    12. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by flyneye · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Nonsense, I'd give Linus a chance to say that Obama is the stupidest socialist motherfucker in the damn world.He believes we are safer with oppression and less freedom, thinks anyone with their own business didn't do it themselves and worse, thinks everyone is stupid as him. Typical Repubmocrat.
      Democrats are just the other side of the same coin. There is only one party, disguised as two, flouting differences minor to the real problems of their misguided greedy governance. They've done nothing but drive the public into the dirt for their own greedy ends for more than a century now, but not everyone buys their " look a bird!" methods of deception.
      Linus was right, Romney is a moron along with the rest of the Repubmocrats.
      I'll give him a +1 insightful for half an insight.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    13. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Lord+Balto · · Score: 1

      Ah, someone with a brain in their head. Agreed.

    14. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Urza9814 · · Score: 0

      Hooray! Someone who gets it!

      Of course, I hope he is an equal opportunity offender -- there are PLENTY of reasons to hate on Obama as well. The only difference is Obama gives better speeches...

    15. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the response on /b/ was "let's draw porn of the girl taking minutes."

    16. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by stevew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Of course, it is sometimes a matter of interpretation what the purpose of anybody's words is..."

      This is the entire problem with the any description of "Hate Speech." It is left to the eye of the beholder - which is the very definition of subjective.

      How can you have free speech when another persons interpretation can turn it into a crime?

      Look - there is nothing in the Constitution about being guaranteed a right to not be uncomfortable with what someone else says, but rather the guarantee is to the person causing the discomfort! If someone chooses to make an extreme comment - then judge them as you will, but it shouldn't be a crime unless someone is harmed physically, or property is destroyed by the person doing the speaking!

      --
      Have you compiled your kernel today??
    17. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Hate speech laws aren't supposed to cover making someone uncomfortable, they're supposed to cover "I'm not telling you to lynch them, but everyone knows (group) are all child-raping murderers, and if someone doesn't do something about them right now they will rape and kill again".

      it shouldn't be a crime unless someone is harmed physically, or property is destroyed by the person doing the speaking!

      So the boss is fine as long as it's just his minions and/or dupes doing the murdering, raping, pillaging and burning?

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    18. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by tbannist · · Score: 1, Informative

      Thinks anyone with their own business didn't do it themselves and worse, thinks everyone is stupid as him.

      Try not to be an obvious idiot, it's clear from the context that Obama thinks that "anyone with their own business" didn't build the roads and bridges that lead to the business. When someone deliberately misunderstands and misrepresents the truth, it just makes them look unreliable and stupid. Do you really want to be the crazy guy ranting on the corner?

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    19. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yup. Anyone who owns a business that claims they built it entirely themselves is deluded. The majority of businesses in this country can't exist without roads - privately built, funded, and maintained roads are an incredibly rare exception, not the norm, and don't function without connectivity to the government-built road network.

      In modern days, it could in theory be possible to have a business that does not directly depend on roads, but still:
      1) The Internet was created using DARPA
      2) Many Internet connections in this country have at least some government subsidization - anyone who lives away from the main road network and has phone service has the government to thank for that.
      3) Can't get your equipment to your site without a road network. (Technically you could air/helo-lift things in - but guess where most of the initial development money for helicopters came from? Guess where the funding for our air traffic control system comes from?)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    20. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Look - there is nothing in the Constitution about being guaranteed a right to not be uncomfortable with what someone else says, but rather the guarantee is to the person causing the discomfort!

      Hate speech isn't about people being uncomfortable or offended. It's about inciting other people.

      If someone chooses to make an extreme comment - then judge them as you will, but it shouldn't be a crime unless someone is harmed physically, or property is destroyed by the person doing the speaking!

      In hate speech the purpose is to get other people to do the harming. So no, it shouldn't only be prosecuted when the speaker himself does the harm.

    21. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Teancum · · Score: 1

      So the boss is fine as long as it's just his minions and/or dupes doing the murdering, raping, pillaging and burning?

      Strangely, yes it is fine... at least from a legal point of view. Just look at Al Capone and what the law was and was not able to actually do to the guy. The only thing he could be nailed on was tax evasion because Capone wouldn't admit to the source of income for millions of dollars that somehow showed up in his bank accounts.

      I'm not saying that I support a guy like this personally, and he may be a ruthless bastard and otherwise deplorable in terms of his ethics. If you can't directly link the actions of somebody to what others are doing, it may be impossible to charge them with crimes that may even be carried out in their name. BTW, I don't mind tax dollars being used to take down such a ruthless bastard either, but it often isn't easy even if you have a whole team of detectives and prosecutors trying to find the links of such a crime boss to what his minions are doing.

    22. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the equillibrium is at 50%, but I think you can critisize both ways and still get some useful feedback on /.

      In this case, Romney does not represent an overwhelming majority of the concervatives, like Reagan did. He's not Ron Paul, and he's certainly not Buddy Roemer. It's clear from his own words that he's focused on the wealthier Republicans, and there's quite a number of hard working conservatives in the 47%.

      So, I think you're safe to express a negative opinion and not have the world dog pile you.

      So is there a technical gaffe from a Democrat you are just itching to critisize? Let's hear it.

    23. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Teancum · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are hundreds of other candidates, none of which are will likely even have a remote shot of actually winning the election.

      One person that is likely going to at least appear on a number of ballots throughout America is Gary Johnson, the current Libertarian Party candidate. If you really can't stomach either Romney nor Obama, that is at least one person to cast that kind of dissenting vote against both political parties. There are currently a total of five presidential candidates that in theory could win the presidency by virtue of the fact that they are officially on enough ballots in enough states with enough electoral votes that something really drastic happening between now and November could open a way for one of those other candidates to actually win. Outside of those five candidates, everybody else really is a fringe candidate and doesn't even have a theoretical chance of winning.

      I'm still undecided in terms of who I will vote for this November, and Gary Johnson is looking pretty nice right now. I'm under no illusion that he even has a remote shot of winning, but it at least gives me somebody to look at other than those other two major party candidates.

    24. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Does the "innocence of the muslims" film then qualify as hate speech?

    25. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Medievalist · · Score: 2

      Yeah, isn't it totally weird how fanatic Republicans won't admit that Obama is an intelligent man who speaks well?

      It's equally weird how fanatic Democrats won't admit the significance of Obama's failure to fulfill his promises to hold telcos accountable for illegal wiretapping, roll back excessive Bush-era secrecy and claims of executive privilege, and end torture. If the man's morals are sufficiently flexible to both disavow and permit torture, that's pretty damn significant.

      Oh noes! I used PROFANITY!

    26. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by BeansBaxter · · Score: 1

      Obamism. The new religion. Do you have tee-shirts? Of course you do. Just one question who generated the revenue for the government to create the infrastructure? How many DARPA servers run the internet backbone today? How many internet servers and fiber are run not for profit or for free? Have you ever tried to get internet in the country? I don't think you'll find any subsidies but good luck.

    27. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by BeansBaxter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Obama and his policies weaken the constitution, destroy jobs and bankrupt our children. I don't care if he is an American or not. The rest is evident by the last 3 years and the economic data that exists. He is running with a proven record.

    28. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by greenzrx · · Score: 1

      Nancy Pelosi is batshit crazy.

    29. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by greenzrx · · Score: 1

      When someone deliberately misunderstands and misrepresents the truth, it just makes them look unreliable and stupid. Do you really want to be the crazy guy ranting on the corner?

      And Romney believes that airplane windows should open. Works both ways...

    30. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Medievalist · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, there's always Jill Stein.

      A Jill Stein vote will not be seen as a call for some political integrity, unfortunately. It will be interpreted as a pro-sustainability, anti-plutocracy vote by the brains (the Rove/Matlin/Carville types) and as crazy, un-american hippy lunacy by the brain-washed and brainless.

    31. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Yes it does and Torvalds has (grudgingly) apologized for not recognizing a joke.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    32. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Linus: Woooooosh

    33. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Jiro · · Score: 1

      It's not as if you had a choice to retroactively take the tax money that was used to pay for the public roads, withdraw it, and use it to build the roads privately and perhaps more efficiently instead.

      Just because the money used to build the roads passed through the hands of the government doesn't mean that the government involvement produced any benefit compared to no government involvement. If I confiscate your car, sell it, keep half the money and use the other half to buy you a crappy car, I don't get to take credit for you owning a car, even though your car was bought by me.

    34. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

      So why isn't a group of people called crazy if they wear ancient torture devices around their neck often with a victim on it. Or if they believe in an all all-knowing, all-mighty spirit that can't seem to communicate with his believers very well. Or who believe that this being could shatter all laws of physics and just create something out of nothing aren't crazy. People that will call it a miracle if one person survives a fiery plane crash but won't attribute the same force to the other 200 people that died. A group that believes all the bad people that accept their savior in their heart will live forever in a beautiful and pleasant place, but all the good people that don't will be condemned to eternal torment.

      Seems there is plenty of crazy in just about every religion.

      And of course we all know that every moron out there becomes millionaires because they are so stupid that it's easy for them to run businesses and invest.

      Sounds like Linus is getting old and Alzheimers is setting in.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    35. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by dbreeze · · Score: 1

      The willingness of the population at large to discount their own contributions to the whole and lay it all at the feet of a few rat/weasel/pig types ............. disturbs me.

      Please vote for anything but Democrat/Republican/Big$. Anything else.
      Please.

      --
      When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
    36. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by garaged · · Score: 1

      I have a chemistry PhD, Im not joking about this, I live between this kind of guys, for real! :)

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    37. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by flyneye · · Score: 1

      What's it to him, if that's the context? Local taxes and state taxes from the BUSINESS OWNERS POCKET as well as the other locals built the road. It's beside the point. No apologists allowed to add kool-aid weak apologies for an obvious hater of the small businessman. I give you a : -1 weak.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    38. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by guruevi · · Score: 2

      The only difference between Mormonism and Christianity or any other large religious group is time. Look at the shit some dude named Moses or Jesus made up. People were laughing at them in their times as well, eventually it became history, then stories, myths and currently there is so little left that most of it is conjecture.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    39. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by guruevi · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as hate speech. There is free speech and not free speech and as a society we have to pick between them. In the end, free speech is the best solution.

      Hate speech is currently being uttered by hundreds if not thousands of evangelical Christian religious groups in the US. If it is absolutely necessary to limit speech, how about before we start limiting speech that may be controversial, limit the speech that has actually already harmed hundreds of helpless children and indoctrinated and brainwashed thousands of people.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    40. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Just one question who generated the revenue for the government to create the infrastructure?

      *I* did, sonny.

      So now your business would like to use the infrastructure I paid for...?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    41. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I've heard worse of Pelosi, and didn't hear of any backlash.

    42. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Gary Johnson isn't a Libertarian. He's a Republican that realized that he'd never get on the Republican ticket, so he's running on the Libertarian ticket, but he's as much a Libertarian as Obama.

    43. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as hate speech.

      There's hate speech every bit as much as there is something called a love letter. Just as a love letter is there to communicate a feeling of love and hopefully inspire that feeling in another person, hate speech is there to communicate a feeling of hate, and to inspire (incite) hatred in others.

      before we start limiting speech that may be controversial

      The problem with hate speech is not that it is controversial. It's that it's intent is to incite hatred in others. At it's most classic and extreme, you have hate speech from leaders of the Ku Klux Klan, resulting in the people listening to the speech going out and lynching people for nothing other than their skin colour. That's happened many times over the years.

      Clearly hate speech exists and is a problem. Whether than problem is more important than a principle of complete free speech is debatable. But don't pretend that a problem that can cause people's deaths, as well as many lesser harms doesn't exist.

      There is in any case no absolute right to free speech anywhere in the world. There's the classic of not being free to shout "fire" in a crowded theatre. Then there's laws of defamation, slander and libel. etc.

      Hate speech exists. The absolute right to free speech doesn't.

    44. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by tbannist · · Score: 1

      What's it to him, if that's the context?

      As long as he doesn't mind looking like an ignorant jackass in public, nothing.

      Local taxes and state taxes from the BUSINESS OWNERS POCKET as well as the other locals built the road.

      So you're saying that by paying their taxes the small business owner has contributed to the society around him? I agree.

      It's beside the point. No apologists allowed to add kool-aid weak apologies for an obvious hater of the small businessman

      Personally, I think the comment is directed at a particular point of view put forth by some people (especially Republicans) that businessmen are entirely responsible for their own success. That government, society, and even employees are ever been a hindrance to them. I've seen that particular point of view referred to as "Ayn Rand Syndrome" among less flattering names. I seriously doubt that Obama hates small businessmen, if you like to make the case for it, go ahead, but pointing out that governments and society have done much to aid every small business owner is not "hate".

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    45. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by tqk · · Score: 1

      I mean "racist" is a pretty damned serious accusation.

      In "polite society", yes it is. In truth, however, we're all racists. We try not to be, but "different from me" defines us.

      s/racist/different/g

      I just try to smile at everyone I meet and hope it works out for the best for both of us. :-|

      Ah crap. Did I say that out loud?

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    46. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      If you do any cursory study of our legal system, you'll find that many things are subjective. "Reasonable doubt", "Reckless behavior", etc... that is the reason we have judges and juries.

      Life isn't black and white. And what is reasonable one century may not be reasonable the next century. That is just how the world works.

      I know that in an ideal world, everyone would be allowed to say anything they want, but in the practical world, some types of speech in some situations causes more harm than the harm of removing a person's right to that speech.

    47. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It's equally weird how fanatic Democrats won't admit the significance of Obama's failure to fulfill his promises to hold telcos accountable for illegal wiretapping, roll back excessive Bush-era secrecy and claims of executive privilege, and end torture. If the man's morals are sufficiently flexible to both disavow and permit torture, that's pretty damn significant.

      Agreed. That's totally bullshit. I'm still not willing to put the party that started that mess back in power because their successors didn't completely clean it up.

    48. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The only difference between Mormonism and Christianity or any other large religious group is time. Look at the shit some dude named Moses or Jesus made up. People were laughing at them in their times as well, eventually it became history, then stories, myths and currently there is so little left that most of it is conjecture.

      True, and it's absolutely fascinating that even when something is totally falsifiable (as is the case with Mormonism partially due to its recent invention), people will STILL be willing to devote their lives to it. People are just dumb to begin with. Religion makes them idiotic.

    49. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Teancum · · Score: 1

      If you don't like Gary Johnson and think that he somehow duped the Libertarian Party (as an organization... it doesn't matter if you think they have lost their way or not) into nominating him with their ballot drive initiatives that have put that part on the ballot of 47 states, he is their nominee regardless of your feelings.

      Besides, as I pointed out there are many others who you can vote for as well. Or do you dispute he is that party's nominee?

    50. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      I didn't say I didn't like him. I didn't say I did. I just pointed out that he began the presidential race as a life-long Republican and moved to the Libertarian ticket after he "lost" as a Republican, and not because of any previous libertarian leanings that he had been flirting with (as could be argued if someone like Ron/Rand Paul did the same)

    51. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by flyneye · · Score: 1

      No I'm saying society and the owner contributed and the federal government and Obamas jackass self did NOTHING for small business and his whole point was not only a lie, but moot.

                I can name several business owners I personally know,including myself that neither recieved, nor want help from society or the federal government. I personally built my own luthery, educated myself to operate it and require NOTHING from anyone to conduct business between myself and others. Obama can swallow my rod! The truth is
      Obama owes everything to everyone else as he is useless by himself as anything but a Repubmocrat figurehead.
      Can you think of a use for which Obama stands alone? A doorstop? A village idiot? Baggage Porter? He's done f**k else FOR anyone that's of any real use, but seems to be good at claiming responsibility for things he has nothing to do with and dodging responsibility for the bullshit he causes.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    52. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Teancum · · Score: 1

      Do you think those in the Libertarian Party knew of his past when they gave him the nomination? My earlier point was that he is the one person who is most likely to appear as an alternative to the two major party candidates by virtue of the fact that he is on more state ballots than any other 3rd party candidate.

      Who cares about what it took for him to get that particular political party's nomination, unless you happen to be a member of that party and have sour grapes hoping it would be somebody else. If you want to point out somebody else who happens to fit your own political leanings, why don't you mention him or her instead?

    53. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Why are you complaining about my complaint? A vote for him is a vote for a Republican, so he's not a 3rd party candidate. Having seen Libertarians make it into Texas state offices with similar past, they were party-line Republicans in office, even if that was anti-Libertarian. They were bitter lying weasels willing to change allegance to anyone/anything that got them power. That's what it looks like happened here, and so he should be voted *against* because of how he got his nomination, and how I'd expect him to act if he were elected.

      As for who I'd recommend, I don't care to. This isn't about my preference, but about my comments on how Gary isn't a libertarian, even if on the Libertarian ticket, and how a life-long member of the party isn't a 3rd party candidate in the sense that he'd do anything any different than any other Republican elected. I'd vote for Mickey Mouse before anyone in this race. Actually, I think it'd be a hoot to vote Clinton and Bush again. Let the Democrats vote Clinton and the Repubs vote Bush, both ineligible from having served 2 terms, but ineligibility to serve doesn't prevent us from voting for them, does it? And the fallout if one of them won would be worth it.

    54. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Oh, I can name several business owners I personally know who will swear up and down that they have neither received, nor want help from society or the government while at the time taking advantage of education, grants, business tax credits, deposit insurance, electricity, sewage, water, roads, and the educated workers they employ. They are islands unto themselves who have built up "incredible businesses" with "absolutely no help" from anyone else, because the start up money from their parents and investors don't count either, and their employees (who do the actual work) are mooches and their customers (who pay them well to do the work) are clueless idiots.

      Now the question is whether anything you or they say is actually true. In all the cases I've observed the speaker has been engaged in political myopia. I'm reminded of the guy from Mississippi who swore up and down the government never did nothing for him and that's why he's voting Republican, despite the fact that he gets food stamps and is on welfare in a state the receives more money from the federal government that it contributes. If you allow it to, what you believe can cloud what you see.

      Can you think of a use for which Obama stands alone?

      I'll grant you that as a politician, author, or a professor of law, Obama would have very little value by himself. What good is a politician with no one to lead, an author with no readers, a professor with no students or lawyer with no clients. But it seems to me that in that case he has about as much value as you. How would your guitar shop (luthery) function with no customers?

      I think you need to give up the blinding rage and consider carefully. I don't care whether you like Obama or not, but nobody likes a raging idiot. Be gracious and admit that your business benefits immensely from society and even government and then you can go back to arguing that government does too much, infringes too many freedoms or costs too much for what it provides.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    55. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by flyneye · · Score: 1

      It's not really taking advantage when it comes out of your pocket. I notice Obama didn't lift a shovel to build a road for anyone.He just runs his mouth.
      Letsee, education; nope,grants,tax credits,deposit insurance,'nope, electricity,water,sewage; out of pocket, roads; local taxes which I pay and I'm my sole employee. My equipment is my own out of my own pocket and if Omama wants to help he can drop by and shine my knob.

      Sorry, but Obama was never my customer and the difference between us is; I supply a demand while he wastes fresh air and space. Where there is a demand, one can profit by supplying it, no thanks to O'mama.

      Dumbass ,every business benefits from individuals, not society making purchases, politicians spend societies money, individuals spend their own.
      Unless of course you're going to start telling us how we wouldn't have any money unless it came from the government or jobs, unless they came from the government. Well, the government just gives us everything doesn't it comrade? Hillbillary was nearly right, it takes a village to raise an idiot.
      If you aren't outraged you're probably happy taking it up the ass or you never worked for anything of your own. Tell that boy to get his knob shiner in here.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    56. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by Quila · · Score: 1

      It is perfectly possible to discuss even serious and difficult problems without inciting hate

      It is very difficult when the other side is extremely sensitive to what we would consider normal discourse. I don't feel we should dumb-down our discourse to please an overly-sensitive group. Preconceptions and traditions need to be challenged, or we live in the past, never advancing. After centuries of debate and reflection, the Jews have come to terms with Moses as a flawed man. Any aspect of Jesus can be debated in Christian societies. But try to discuss Mohammed's flaws in front of Muslims, and you may get a price on your head.

    57. Re:Fortunately, Romney isn't a Democrat by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      You appear to be suggesting that if the government wouldn't use taxpayers' money to pay people (government or otherwise) to build roads, there would still be roads. I see 3 different ways this could happen:
      1. Private companies can turn a reasonable yearly Return On Investment by levying tolls for building and maintaining roads (including roads that connect rural villages in the middle of nowhere; it's a big country).
      2. People in said rural villages would all happily pool their money together in a fund that would quickly grow large enough to build a road, rather than just keep on paying to get their supplies flown over by bush plane while complaining how much this costs and how they cannot spare any money for that damn utopian "road project".
      3. Wait... what? Unicorns shit roads in addition to rainbows now?

      I'm honestly not sure which of these 3 options is most unlikely, but I have to remark that if option 1. were to somehow turn true (may I suggest forcing people at gunpoint to use the roads), the users of these roads would be screaming for their government to end the rip-off, and as for option 2., well, these must be pretty damn rich rural communities, the FBI might want to look into exactly what they're farming there.

      I'm not sure what kind of libertarian fantasy you're living in, but here in the real world, some upfront investments need to be made for the common good in order to build an advanced society that can achieve a high per-capita GDP (which a lot of you people think is the ultimate Meaning of Life). And a lot of these things cannot be afforded by the subgroup of people who directly benefit from it. And the people who indirectly benefit would be too short-sighted to invest a large amount of money. (Don't we all want the domestically-grown food that these rural communities produce? Well guess what, the food needs some way to get to you, and I'm sure you won't want to pay to get your food flown over by bush plane.) In short, there's no known practical way to build an advanced society without taxpayer's money being invested into infrastructure. Thinking there is is slightly more naive than believing that communism could work. If you know of a way, please cite an example where it worked, otherwise shut up.


      BTW, the idea that private companies inherently get the job done more cost-effectively is an equally huge myth. I'll try to put it simple for you. Companies need to turn profit. Not only that, they need to make a certain amount of profit in order to be attractive for investors (look up wonderful concepts like ROE, ROA,...) Or in simpler words, the profit must be high enough to make it worth it. For a lot of things, this "overhead" is bigger than what the government of a civilized country could ever realistically waste through real or perceived ineffectiveness. Generally, private business does not have an inherent edge in cost-effectiveness; forget about it already. Where it does have an edge is in innovation (which can give it a de facto edge in cost-effectiveness in sectors that evolve rapidly) and in fueling monetary turnover and a healthy economy. Provided that there is a regulator that actively counteracts the companies' natural tendency to form monopolies/oligopolies/trusts/cartels and stop competing and innovating.

  71. Re:I would not be surprised if he got death threat by Xandrax · · Score: 2

    Funny how conservatives are just like liberals in that way. Get off your high horse. Your herd sucks just as much as theirs.

  72. Mormons by KermodeBear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In my experience, people who criticize Mormonism and call it "batshit insane" don't know anything about it other than "Magic Underwear! Har har har!" and the other tripe they've seen on TV. Nor do they actually know any Mormons. They don't know a thing about the history, the reasons why they do, or don't do, certain things.

    It's pretty obnoxious. Mormons are good people - they have different values and traditions than a lot of others, and some of them are certainly weird from an outsider's perspective, but they're good people. You don't see Mormons blowing up buildings. They're more likely to be seen helping needy people - and not making a big deal out of it.

    I'd rather live next to a dozen Mormon families than be surrounded by "trollololol spageti monster har har arent i funy" types.

    And no, not those fringe cults that bonk 12 year old girls say they're Mormon - because they're not.

    I'm sure I'll get flamed for daring to defend a Mormon though, because this is Slashdot and FSM forbid I actually, you know, say anything GOOD about religious people...

    --
    Love sees no species.
    1. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure I'll get flamed

      Now that you've said that, you deserve it.

    2. Re:Mormons by xs650 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, I have known many Mormans that are good honorable people. Their religion is still based on a scam though.

    3. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Top 10 Mormon Problems Explained An hour and 20 minute video that talks about some of the issues with Mormonism. So yeah people know more than just the underwear thing, and yes even without that... Mormonism is bat shit crazy.

    4. Re:Mormons by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Informative

      And no, not those fringe cults that bonk 12 year old girls say they're Mormon - because they're not.

      Some Scotsmen might have something to say about that

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've read the history of Mormonism and don't find it batshit insane!?!

      Exactly how far does your suspension of disbelief stretch?

    6. Re:Mormons by ceoyoyo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It sounds like you're the one who doesn't know much about Mormonism, particularly the history of it.

      Joseph Smith, the founder of the religion, dictated the book of Mormon to his wife, apparently dictated to him (or translated) by a magic rock. The religion did indeed include such gems as polygamous marriage.

      Mormon fundamentalists (those fringe cultists that bonk 12 year old girls) disagree with modern mainstream Mormons, mostly belonging to the Church of Latter Day Saints, about several things that the LDS church dropped for political expediency including:

      polygamy (abandoned in the early 20th century, IIRC as a condition of Utah's statehood, and there may have been an army and some artillery involved to hasten the decision)

      Adam and Eve as aliens (Adam later became God, abandoned in the mid 20th century)

      human sacrifice as punishment for serious crimes (blood atonement, supposedly no longer in force by 1978, but still occasionally coming up in Utah death penalty trials)

      and banning black men from the priesthood (1978).

      Make no mistake though, the 12 year old bonking fundamentalists are the real Mormons, the ones who have kept the original beliefs of Mormonism. The ones you like so much are the watered down variety who exchanged their unpopular beliefs for more mainstream acceptance (not that trading crazy beliefs for not getting shot at is a bad thing).

      Now, worshipping the words of a magic rock and Adam and Eve as alien colonists doesn't seem that much more batshit insane to me than worshipping a magic man in the sky who once decided he'd like to knock up some poor human sap's girlfriend. I know some Mormons, and most of them are nice enough, just like most of the Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists and atheists I know. I even knew some Jehovah's Witnesses who I liked well enough once, even if they were a little too quick to criticize other people's Christmas trees and one of them absconded owing me for three months rent and a hefty phone bill.

    7. Re:Mormons by tragedy · · Score: 1

      You don't see Mormons blowing up buildings.

      Mormons are just as capable of crimes as anyone else. Ted Bundy, for example, was a Mormon. Mark Hoffman, also a Mormon killed two people with bombs and would have continued if a third bomb hadn't gone off prematurely and injured him. Richard Floyd McCoy, Jr. hijacked a plane with a hand grenade and a gun. Of course, you could claim that their actions make them not Mormons via the no-true-scotsman argument. This is the same argument that you used when you wrote:

      And no, not those fringe cults that bonk 12 year old girls say they're Mormon - because they're not.

      They may be splinter groups, but Mormonism is still the root of the religion they practice. Also, their practices seem to be consistent with those of the early founders of the church.

    8. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mormons follow a cult created by a guy who pretended to be interpreting the words of an all mighty creator from ancients tablets hidden in a hat. Ancient tablets he would have found in the woods, that only he could understand and that NOBODY ever saw... ffs !

        I mean I "understand" people following a religion based on myths dating from millenia (actually I don't they're batshit crazy too but nvm) but we had print and newspaper in the 19th century. John smith was a frakking lunatic. Wake up.

        More to the point I don't see how calling mormonism crazy is a political statement. It's a statement allright, because it reflects the reality but other than that..
      And the same goes for calling Romney a twat, because he is : nobody likes him because there is nothing to like, he is a political wuss who caved in front of the radical right wing even thought he is a super dupper moderate at heart, and he has been flip flop-ing on every single issue he has talked about in the last 5 years.

        Not to forget he is an arrogant douchebag. Frankly I don't agree with what Romney is saying right now, but I even more confused by the fact that 90% of what he is saying he doesn't believe ! I have 0 idea about what an elected Mitt Romney would do, and when I hear him or Ryan talk I end up thinking he doesn't either.

    9. Re:Mormons by mclaincausey · · Score: 2

      I know Mormons. They're people like every other group. Some good, some bad. But the religion is ridiculous. The charrlatanism simply has the disadvantage of having originated during fairly recent (relatively speaking) recorded history (there is a rich record of Smith being a huckster), and of being at odds with anthropology and other sciences on a number of items (he wasn't educated enough to know is his fairy tales which beasts were indigenous to pre-Columbian North America). It doesn't matter that they don't blow up buildings, neither do Scientologists.

      --
      (%i1) factor(777353);
      (%o1) 777353
    10. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mormonism is batshit insane. Joseph Smith was a con-man and the Book of Mormon is a work of fiction. The properties of the belief system have nothing to do with its followers or proponents, though I do think a steadfast belief in it indicates a severe tolerance to cognitive dissonance and/or lack of critical thinking abilities.

      I know a lot of really nice people who are Mormon. Some of them are excellent problem solvers and some have demonstrated amazing critical thinking skills. They have just developed an amazing ability to compartmentalize their brain in a way that separates their ridiculous belief system from their ability to reason about the world around them. It's quite astonishing, really.

    11. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mormonism is just great and lovely and wonderful unless you're a gay person, and you realize the institution is determined to ensure their religious beliefs should trump your constitutional rights by pouring millions of dollars into the political process while simultaneously enjoying massive tax breaks on the "religious" basis.

    12. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've met several Mormons (LDS) -- they show up at my door uninvited every so often. They come in pairs, wearing white shirts with little black nametaggs, distributing literature about Joseph Smith and some gold plates.

      Are they nice people? They certainly seem perfectly nice. Would I mind living with them as neighbors? I'm sure they make perfectly good neighbors, although I suspect that they might be inclined to elect officials that I would not want elected. The creator of Ruby (Matz) has, as I understand it, a fairly high standing in his local Mormon church. The Mormons (not LDS) I've seen on the reality show Sister Wives (a polygamous family) I know enough about to feel that we could be friends.

      I have no problem with hating the religion buy loving the followers. I hate any religion that requires its followers to not just travel the world for the purpose of annoying all non-followers, but to actually attempt to replace those people's religion (and hence culture) with that of the missionaries.

      dom

    13. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mormons are good people

      Who took filthy lucre from Utah and pumped it into California under the auspices of slaying Liberty, because gays are icky.

      Fuck Mormons. They're not good people.

    14. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some broad definition of Mormon you might be able to call the polygamous groups Mormons.

      In popular use however, Mormon refers to members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. That's the church that Romney belongs to, which will excommunicate you if you practice polygamy or are a pedophile.

      Regarding the No True Mormon argument (where Mormon means member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints), I don't think it quite fits. Mormons consider anyone who has been baptized, who is still alive, and who has not been excommunicated to be a member. Under this definition there could (and probably are) polygamists, murders, pedophiles etc. among those counted as members. They would remain counted as members of the Church until their behavior was discovered and the excommunication process had occurred.

    15. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mormons may, or may not, be bat-shit crazy. Mormonism is however totally bat-shit crazy.

    16. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mormonism is one of those rare religions modern enough for people to know exactly how it was made up by the professional scam artist Joseph Smith. Now you can make all sorts of assumptions as to how people who crap on Mormonism don't know anything about it but that's just BS. It has been found over and over again in surveys that people who do not believe in religions typically know more about them than the actual followers of these religions. To be honest any adult who still believes in santa claus or life after death is worthy of being made fun of. Wishful thinking is nothing to be particularly proud of. Still that doesn't mean that followers of a particular faith can't be good or that if they are it somehow gives credence to the truthfulness of their belief systems. So if you want to defend Mormonism then please do so, you haven't really started yet.

    17. Re:Mormons by greggman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Agreed, Mormons are no more bat shit insane than any religion. in fact they are arguably better than most.

      Mormons have no paid clergy. No one in the Mormon church is making a living of it's members unlike most other religions

      Mormons don't believe in a vengeful God

      Mormons have their own welfare system and prefer members that need it take from the church not from the government

      Mormons believe God exists in this dimension, not some alternate unseeable dimension like most religions

      Mormons believe we are literally Gods children as in if we do well we'll grow up to be gods. From the pov of most religions that might seem strange but from another pov it adds a kind if logic the others lack. You don't have to try to be good to avoid hell (Mormons don't really believe in hell like other religions) .. You need to try to be good because you can't be a god if you can't be trusted with that kind of power

      Note: the Mormon religion is just as stupid as other religion on the general sense but it's certainly not more insane.

    18. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You literally have no idea what you're talking about and very well demonstrated the OP's point. Oh and I know cuz I AM mormon

    19. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know something about their history, and I do know Mormons, and there is simply no escaping the statement that the religion is batshit insane.

      And on the subject of Mormon history and values:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_Meadows_massacre

    20. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the Mormons had/have their own vigilante hit-squad - The Danites.

    21. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is unfortunate.

      You have a lot of misinformation here.

    22. Re:Mormons by fishybell · · Score: 2
      Sigh.

      While there is a slight argument to be made as to whether or not it was for "political expediency," those are indeed beliefs and traditions the LDS church has followed at one time or another (speaking to you from the heart and soul of Mormonism in Provo, UT):

      Now as far as the Warren Jeffs, 12 year old bonking crowd, yes they're crazy, but no they merely started at the same root of the tree. No original-orthodoxy Mormons are left, they're dead. The rest -- at least much of the rest here in Utah -- seem to want to live their lives with blinders on about the past (and the outside world, help! I'm trapped in a bubble!). Go and ask your bishop about all of these things and he'll, a: sigh, and b: give you a well thought out, and historically accurate accounting of the church's somewhat malleable belief system.

      --
      ><));>
    23. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a "No True Scotsman" fallacy if your argument is that "Mormon scripture and belief do not support the boinking of 12 year olds, and no longer support the idea of multiple wives"

    24. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there any mythologies that aren't batshit crazy? Probably not.

    25. Re:Mormons by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      You're taking a lot of things out of context and twisting them to make them seem far stranger than they are. That's the same sort of behavior that the evangelicals engage in to make evolution seem crazy and atheists seem dangerous to other evangelicals. I suspect your understanding isn't that great, all you've heard is some sensationalist things that have been twisted for shock value.

    26. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I have known many Mormans that are good honorable people. Their religion is still based on a scam though.

      Which one isn't?

    27. Re:Mormons by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Do you want to see my golden plates?

    28. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like you're the one who doesn't know much about Mormonism, particularly the history of it.

      You say this, but the rest of the words you typed are so wrong I have to wonder where you're getting your information from.

    29. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would challenge anyone to read up on Smith and the origins of Mormonism and not come to the conclusion that it was a joke, scam or the product of a deranged mind.

    30. Re:Mormons by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      If they violate the explicit teachings in the Book of Mormon, what else would you call it?

      And yes, there are splinter groups that could legitimately call themselves Mormon, it just makes LDS uncomfortable (due to the ambiguity it causes).

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    31. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make that "ALL religion is based on a scam"

    32. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that all Christians believe in a god that blessed polygamy. There are several examples in the bible. Similarly they believe some guy climbed a mountain and talked to a burning bush and was given clay tablets. They all believe in a bible with examples of human sacrifice as well.

      I don't know what your Adam and Eve reference is but if anything the Mormon belief that God lives in these universe and not some alternate dimension and that he has many worlds (planets) is at least slightly more logical than believing he's in some alternate dimension and only Earth has anyone on it.

      In other words, Mormons are insane but no more insane than any religion

    33. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like you're the one who doesn't know much about Mormonism, particularly the history of it.

      Joseph Smith, the founder of the religion, dictated the book of Mormon to his wife, apparently dictated to him (or translated) by a magic rock. The religion did indeed include such gems as polygamous marriage.

      Christianity has a long history of polygamous marriage. Many of the major characters in the Bible had multiple wives. The first pope had concubines. It wasn't until much later that they came up with the idea that this was a bad thing. I don't think it is a good thing. But, was originally advocated by the top leaders in Christianity.

             

    34. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You don't see Mormons blowing up buildings."

      hrm. see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Hofmann

    35. Re:Mormons by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Polygamy and marriage at puberty can make perfect sense, though modern society is arranged differently. Women waiting almost until menopause to get married like in our current culture is very strange indeed.

    36. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right. The common people that are tricked into following the teachings from this religion are decent enough people. The ones in charge and those that have the ambition to climb up the Mormon ranks...not so much. These people deserve every ridicule they are given! If you would have taken a look at their history, Mormons have slaughtered, nay literally butchered several hundreds of men, women and children because they could not pay to pass some lands those Mormons claimed for their own, little separatists that they were. Or actually still are, as they now offer their believers a whole planet in their after-life, but only after they fullfil their contractual obligation to annually pay 10% of their yearly income (before taxes). You know, you have to coff up some serious cash before this Jesus cult finds you worthy of their love. Can you still call it tithing when contracts are involved? Or should you see this money as downpayments for the after-lifes planet?

      Come to think of it, paying for love...those Mormons look more and more like pimps, are they not? The Vatican does not consider them Christian at all. Would that be because Mormons do little girls instead of boys? Got one of their church leaders a life sentence without parole for those acts with little girls (about six months ago?

      The above might be offensive to you, but it also states that the existence of (any) religion is offensive to any rational thinking person. So, go back to your church, temple or whatever you call your meeting grounds and stop bothering the rest of the world!

      Let me tell you another secret. The moment a religion starts to organize itself, it immediately becomes a tool for man, not God. God does not have any need for any tool created by man. If he would, there would be not much sense in calling him the almighty now, would it? Come on, how simple does the logic need to get for people believing in imaginary friends...

    37. Re:Mormons by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      No thanks, you can keep them in your pants.

    38. Re:Mormons by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Polygamy isn't the batshit insane part, although it is the bit that gets most Christians bent out of shape. Widespread polygamy doesn't work in stable societies that aren't frequently at war though - if one guy has more than one wife then someone else doesn't get any, and he's likely to be unhappy unless he's conveniently killed fighting somewhere.

    39. Re:Mormons by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Funny, because that's exactly the same charge that's levelled at the Mormon church by a lot of Mormons who have quit.

      Yes, I'm not using the same language as Mormons (new or old) do, but I think it's an accurate, if succinct, translation. If you'd like to debate something in particular please go ahead and mention it, along with your interpretation. Your vague objections don't really amount to much so far.

    40. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And no, not those fringe cults that bonk 12 year old girls say they're Mormon - because they're not."

      They are, tho (regardless of what the largest Mormon church might wish for terminology). They're not the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, though.

      And sure, plenty of Mormon's are good people. The church, however, is quite sexist and anti-gay (along with most other Christian denominations). (And racist until the 1978.) There's also their dodgy interpretation of early North American history, and attempting to prove their religions beliefs about it.

      Some of the theology about God and the afterlife is fascinating though, and it's a pity they feel the need to downplay it to demonstrate that they're Christians too.

    41. Re:Mormons by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Just give those dudes the internet and an xbox! Too bad God didn't mention this in the Book of Mormon, maybe Joseph Smith just left it out because he couldn't understand what was being revealed

    42. Re:Mormons by Hatta · · Score: 2

      Mormons are good people

      Sorry, no one who belongs to an organization that oppresses homosexuals is a good person.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    43. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fountain of knowledge is deep here on /. You have no idea what you're talking about. I imagine you're afraid to get too close to the religion to do any real research on it. What are you so afraid of?

    44. Re:Mormons by Stele · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have known many Mormans that are good honorable people. All religions are still based on scams though.

      FTFY

    45. Re:Mormons by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      It's not a "No True Scotsman" fallacy if your argument is that "Mormon scripture and belief do not support the boinking of 12 year olds, and no longer support the idea of multiple wives"

      Why, isn't God infallible? Why would he suddenly change his mind about what was a central tenet of the church? Unless it wasn't actually a revelation from God that made them stop the practice (not that Mormons would compromise their religious beliefs because of political pressure).

      --

      Enigma

    46. Re:Mormons by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      Mormons have no paid clergy. No one in the Mormon church is making a living of it's members unlike most other religions

      Normal members that perform duties for the church (Bishop, Stake Leaders, etc.) don't get paid but people higher in the hierarchy (like the church president) do draw a salary from the church.

      --

      Enigma

    47. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be true if it's published on wikipedia.

    48. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      troll

    49. Re:Mormons by mcleaver · · Score: 1

      So Mormons are even more batshit crazy than some religions and less than others. I prefer the Richard Dawkins line. A racket that became a religion. http://old.richarddawkins.net/articles/935

    50. Re:Mormons by Mr.Intel · · Score: 1

      Sigh.

      While there is a slight argument to be made as to whether or not it was for "political expediency," those are indeed beliefs and traditions the LDS church has followed at one time or another (speaking to you from the heart and soul of Mormonism in Provo, UT):

      Now as far as the Warren Jeffs, 12 year old bonking crowd, yes they're crazy, but no they merely started at the same root of the tree. No original-orthodoxy Mormons are left, they're dead. The rest -- at least much of the rest here in Utah -- seem to want to live their lives with blinders on about the past (and the outside world, help! I'm trapped in a bubble!). Go and ask your bishop about all of these things and he'll, a: sigh, and b: give you a well thought out, and historically accurate accounting of the church's somewhat malleable belief system.

      Or as I do for the members of my ward who ask about these things, c) explain what Elder Oaks taught about the two channels of revelation and how understanding the history of the church ends up hinging on how well you and I can access knowledge from God.

      --
      ASCII tastes bad dude.
      Binary it is then.
    51. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't be black prior to 1978. Or a woman trying to get into heaven without the magic password established by your husband, eh?

    52. Re:Mormons by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, Mormons are not required to become missionaries (source: I know Mormons who never went on missions), and those I know that did go on missions consider that experience to be among of the most meaningful and spiritual events of their lives. With that said, I can understand disliking religions that have their members go door-to-door to find new converts. I don't mind it so much, but I get it. Personally, I find political robo-callers far more irritating.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    53. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, Mormons are no more bat shit insane than any religion. in fact they are arguably better than most.

      Better than most does not always mean "good", it can also mean "slightly less shitty". Mormons are slightly less hypocritical than most other Christians, but when you get right down to it, the decent ones are just as rare as anywhere else. This implies that the decentness doesn't stem from the religion itself, but from their good, and somewhat rare, character.

      Mormons have no paid clergy. No one in the Mormon church is making a living of it's members unlike most other religions

      This is true, but it should be noted that a big stipend is available to their highest leaders as well as their church paying for a lot of their expenses (no different than a CEO). Most of their lower, un-paid clergy are succesful businessmen (no women clergy, they don't have the priesthood). Few Mormon Bishops' households, for example, would rank below the top 10% of household incomes nationwide or for their area.

      Mormons don't believe in a vengeful God

      In theory, except for those repeated "rampaging lion" threats in their Book of Mormon. Also, US Mormons tend love vengeance in the US justice system just as much as the next bloodthirsty American. Mormons don't have a "hell" in the traditional sense, but they still largely motivate by guilt and the threat of "damnation", they just have a different theory on what damnation entails.

      Mormons have their own welfare system and prefer members that need it take from the church not from the government

      They frequently take from both, also if you don't have a temple recommend (a statement by one's bishop that one is worthy to participate in their most important sacraments), most welfare will be withheld from you. Also, I've know a lot of "welfare" Mormons and they tend to be very negative about the idea of any kind of government taxes and government welfare, stating people should "buck up" and do it themselves, blissfully unaware of their blatent hypocrisy.

      Mormons believe God exists in this dimension, not some alternate unseeable dimension like most religions

      Mormons believe their god is a man that lived under a different god and "aced the test", so got to be a god himself. This is what Mormons strive for. I'm not sure why you're listing it as an attribute. The Mormon god is just as weird as any other god, the details simply differ.

      Mormons believe we are literally Gods children as in if we do well we'll grow up to be gods. From the pov of most religions that might seem strange but from another pov it adds a kind if logic the others lack. You don't have to try to be good to avoid hell (Mormons don't really believe in hell like other religions) .. You need to try to be good because you can't be a god if you can't be trusted with that kind of power

      Note: the Mormon religion is just as stupid as other religion on the general sense but it's certainly not more insane.

      But THAT is the point, they're not some special snowflake of religion, if one thinks religion is crazy, Mormons are just as crazy. While I'd agree that another Christian calling Mormons batshit insane is both myopic and ironic, but Mormons are pretty fringe. I will say one thing in their favor, they manage to be more internally consistent with their own theology than other religions (e.g. god loves everyone, you have to be baptized to go to heaven, everyone who never had that chance is just fucked for most Christians, Mormons actually try to address issues like that).

      I've known a metric ton of Mormons, they're really not any more super special than anyone else. Yes, there's Mormon dentists that go down to a third world country and do work for free for several months every year or two, but there's atheist dentists that do that as well. Charity is, in theory, one of their core values, in practice it doesn't seem a whole lot more common among them than anyone else.

    54. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mormon Clergy receiving pay:
      http://www.utlm.org/onlineresources/paidclergy.htm

      Mormon War:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_War

      Its easy to go on and on. Mormon religion is based on a scam, and now is a huge money making operation (and more I'm sure). He cannot drink caffeine!! but oh wait we own a great stake in a major soda company, you can drink that caffeine though cuz we make money off you!! lol Its totally bogus.

      Mormons must tithe, mormons must segregate from non mormons. google for many mormon horror stories and ex mormon support groups. I do encourage people to look at the history of it, its the history that brings it all to light. I have known many Mormons, they all seem good people but with twisted belief system. A cult for sure, but don't take my word for it, research its history (from non-mormon or neutral sites, and some of their own sites too i'm sure)

    55. Re:Mormons by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      Regarding the JW who ran off with rent money. If it were known what they did in the congregation it would certainly not be ignored. Many outsiders don't agree with the practice of disfellowshipping but scriptural commands such as stealing are expected to be obeyed. Firstly they would have the opportunity to make recompense and pay you back in full, only if refusing would it come to that.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    56. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barely. Compared to other many other churches where presidents live lives of luxury mormon leaders get fairly modest amounts, many take none if they have the means to support themselves. That's vastly different than the stereotype of many religions.

    57. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF.......only on /.

    58. Re:Mormons by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Hm... I didn't think of tattling on her to the temple. She'd moved to a new city though... Can they track people anywhere?

    59. Re:Mormons by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      When you move to a new congregation the elders send a letter of introduction to the new one. So they would be able to tell you where she moved.

      Mormons have temples, JW's have Kingdom Halls.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    60. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience, people who criticize Mormonism and call it "batshit insane" don't know anything about it other than "Magic Underwear! Har har har!" and the other tripe they've seen on TV. Nor do they actually know any Mormons. They don't know a thing about the history, the reasons why they do, or don't do, certain things.

      In my extensive experience, as someone who is related to Mormons, whose ancesters were Mormon, who has read the Bible, Book of Mormon, Doctrine & Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price (the 4 books of Mormom "scripture") cover to cover and knows more about Mormonism than I ever would wish on anyone, I can say this unequivocally, based not only on Mormon belief and dogma, but on their often duplicitous and destructive behavior:

      Mormons are in fact batshit crazy and if this country is so foolish as to elect one to its highest office, the world will almost certainly get a very harsh lesson in exactly how batshit crazy Mormons in fact are.

      Don't let the nice-happy-shiny facade fool you. While they are smiling in your face, they are also whispering behind your back, judging you to be unfit, and referring to you (and everything you think and believe) dismissively as a Gentile. They believe they are the only ones whose beliefs are true, they are unyielding and unwavering in this belief regardless of scientific evidence to the contrary, have committed acts of violence (including massacres) in that belief, and are convinced they will inherit and rule the Earth, beginning with the United States. Sound mad? It is, and it scares the shit out of me every time I hear my sister say it, with the same "pained" self-righteous, holier-than-though blank-faced look on her face that Mitt Romney gets whenever he is confronted with an uncomfortable fact that debunks his world view, before launching off into a tangent that restates his premise while dismissing you as someone who just "doesn't understand."

    61. Re:Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know more than a few full time employees of the mormon church

  73. It was self-deprecating humor (Romney) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, come on!! That's self-deprecating humor designed to make him seem endearing. Jesus. I'm so sick of the media manipulating and misrepresenting everything.

  74. GOP/GPL by WarpedCore · · Score: 2

    Hopefully they'll release Romney's source code.

    1. Re:GOP/GPL by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Hopefully they'll release Romney's source code.

      Do you think Linus will port Linux to Romney if they release the specs?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  75. Re:I would not be surprised if he got death threat by rossz · · Score: 1

    Some of those leftists don't even realize they act just like the extremist muslims when they demand speech they dislike be stopped.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
  76. Goose Sauce Gander Sauce by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Snopes article says Romney was perhaps joking though it isn't definitive.

    The irony is palpable. Romney's camp is accusing his opponents of misquoting him, but the centerpiece of Romney's campaign against Obama is a misquote of Obama saying "Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" where they cut out the first part so it says "If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" - something very different.

    Romney's camp can't have it both ways: If they want to run on the Obama misquote then how about they accept Romney doesn't understand why aircraft windows don't open.

    And as usual, the real issues remain pushed to the sideline as too hard for an electorate who don't have an attention span that lasts long than a soundbite.

    1. Re:Goose Sauce Gander Sauce by Q-Hack! · · Score: 0

      The irony is palpable. Romney's camp is accusing his opponents of misquoting him, but the centerpiece of Romney's campaign against Obama is a misquote of Obama saying "Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" where they cut out the first part so it says "If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" - something very different.

      The sad part here is that you fell for the liberal media view that Romney's campaign pulled the statement out of context, when no such thing happend. Yes, there were a few pundits who did just that, but not the official capaign. In fact, Romney even made an alalogy to the event that sums it up nicely. (paraphrasing here) You don't give the school bus driver credit for the honour student's success. Yes, the school bus driver got the kid to school, but it was the hard work of the student that is celebrated.

      In my mind, the full context of President Obama's words are just as bad. He continually denigrates successfull buisnesses, this just being one example.

      --
      Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
    2. Re:Goose Sauce Gander Sauce by Raenex · · Score: 2

      The sad part here is that you fell for the liberal media view that Romney's campaign pulled the statement out of context, when no such thing happend. Yes, there were a few pundits who did just that, but not the official capaign.

      Oh really?

      "The Romney campaign replays Obama saying "if you've got a business, you didn't build that" five times in a 15-second video as part of a "petition" drive. It also uses the quote in an email fundraising appeal."

      In fact, Romney even made an alalogy to the event that sums it up nicely. (paraphrasing here) You don't give the school bus driver credit for the honour student's success. Yes, the school bus driver got the kid to school, but it was the hard work of the student that is celebrated.

      In my mind, the full context of President Obama's words are just as bad. He continually denigrates successfull buisnesses, this just being one example.

      So here is a quote from the full context: "The point is, is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together." [bold mine]

      Now compare that to Romney and his 47%.

    3. Re:Goose Sauce Gander Sauce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck did this get labeled insightful. Obama really did say that. Use Google and you might not be shown to be a fool. Now this was just one sentence in a speech, so you might say it was taken out of context. Some people say the context makes it worse.

    4. Re:Goose Sauce Gander Sauce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that Obama does hold entrepreneurs (successful ones, in particular) in contempt. That quote, while perhaps not exactly what republicans might imply still goes to the core of who Obama is.

      Removable airplane windows don't address the core of who Romney is. Class warfare is what Obama does, it's who he is.

  77. Re:Romney *is* a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Politics, in the broader sense is the domain of everyone, not just the professional liars we call 'politicians.' Everyone has a right to have an opinion and to give input into the process of maintaining society. Linus has as much right to call Romney a fucking moron as Romney has to express the opinion that 47% of Americans are freeloaders.

    As for using words that some people find offensive, they are just sounds - combinations of phonemes. There are few adjectives better than 'fucking' for expressing disgust and disrespect.

  78. Re:Romney *is* a moron by AchilleTalon · · Score: 3, Interesting
    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
  79. Quoteth The Dave... by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

    "I don't want a president who looks like a game show host." - David Letterman

  80. Re:Romney *is* a moron by ArcherB · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't ask Romney to fix kernel bugs just as I don't look to Linux for political advice. Both should stick to what they know.

    You imply that Romney is a source for political advice. The current (supposedly left-leaning but maybe not) polls speak otherwise.

    You are correct. Romney is not the best of politicians. His specialty is management. He has a record of taking things that are failing and turning them around. Bain Capital is an example as it was on the verge of bankruptcy when Romney took over as CEO. The Olympics are another example.

    The least important part of a politicians job is politics. That's what gets him elected, but it has very little to do with how well he runs the executive branch. Obama has absolutely no managerial experience. I believe that's why we are stagnant on crap right now. Every job he ever had, he was part of a committee. He's never had to balance a budget, hire someone, promote someone, fire someone. He's never had to make the decision that will ruin the lives of 100's to save the jobs of thousands. He's never had to negotiate a debt settlement or make a function more efficient. Now he's in charge. When he's presented with a decision, he looks around to see how others are voting, but everyone else is just staring at him. He's a hell of a politician, but that doesn't run the country.

    And credible polls like Gallup and Rasmussen show the race as a dead heat.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  81. But wait... by bmo · · Score: 1, Troll

    Mitt Romney is dumb as a post, lacking in humlity, candor, and empathy.

    Every time you see him interacting with someone on the campaign trail, his affect is never one of any sympathy, but just blindly spewing talking points to whatever question is asked, and if it especially important, he simply won't answer it, but go off on a tangent.

    Linus is absolutely right, and a lot of people are afraid to point at Mittens and say the emperor is missing his shirt. Linus simply pointed out that not only is he missing his shirt, but he has not a stitch on, and his schwanzstucker is waving about for the kids to see.

    More people need to be unafraid to point out stupidity for what it is. Maybe then the GOP would not be seen as the party of teatards, xenophobes, and sociopaths that it is today.

    Good on Linus. Three cheers.

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:But wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is dull as a post. The rest also may be true. But do not call him completely dumb.... I may not like the man or his politics, but I have spent an evening in his company at a dinner a few years ago. The man has a few cute parlor tricks.... Factoring numbers given to him in his head, the ability to do entire cost sheets in his head... That man is a geek. A socially akward, very focused geek that is very obtuse about anything that isn't in his interest range. Mostly business. Business to him is like a computer to me, he thinks about it in a weirdly focused, twisted way, and can make it do things the average person cannot.
       
        That said, his presidency would be like his governorship - small corners would be cut, to increase profits, despite the long term problems generated. He is purely a short term growth kind of man.

    2. Re:But wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mitt Romney is dumb as a post, lacking in humlity, candor, and empathy.

      He's not as charismatic as Obama. True. But dumb as a post? He has two degrees from Harvard! I think by any objective measurement he's probably smarter than most /. commenters.

  82. Re:Romney *is* a moron by scot4875 · · Score: 1

    I don't ask Romney to fix kernel bugs just as I don't look to Linux for political advice. Both should stick to what they know.

    Agreed. Both should stay far away from the White House.

    --Jeremy

    --
    Jesus was a liberal
  83. Linus' follow up... by Hobart · · Score: 4, Informative

    https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/TTeQKFPrCQU?hl=en

    Linus Torvalds - 3:19 PM - Public

    Ok, since I publicly called the guy a f*cking moron, I guess I should also publicly follow up: it does seem Romney was joking.

    Whew.

    ...Move along. Can we get back to hating on proprietary blobs now?

    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
    1. Re:Linus' follow up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This might literally cost Obama the election. Obama's biggest weapon is that he can
      point to Romney and say "Bain Capital! He's a big meanie. Vote for me: I'm the nice guy."

      By criticizing Romney for trying to be nice to his suffering wife, Romney's opponents (and, by extension, Obama) just just their moral high ground. Compassion (and intelligence) to
      Democrats is like sex to Republicans -- if they do it wrong, they lose a huge amount. And frankly, intelligence is not an objective characteristic of Obama right now. All he can say is "What and see, my heart's in the right place, I've got your back." Well, what if his heart IS NOT in the right place? Maybe he doesn't have our back.

  84. Shocker! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Software guy from Finland not fond of Republicans. Film at 11. Nobody's surprised, they're just surprised he said it. Now, can somebody please leave the mic on when Romney talks about bombing Iran and how that will stimulate the economy again? You know that's in his head, and if it isn't there some Cheney-esque lobbyist from the military-indsutrial complex will be sure it gets there. That's pretty much the no. 1 reason to vote Obama, no matter how much you hate the unions. Yes, public unions suck and are bankrupting one city after another; but they haven't gone on any $trillion killing sprees lately.

  85. Fame and opinions by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

    You want people to be silent their whole lives because they are famous? Even obviously unintentional fame?

    I can't remember him making too many overt political statements before. And besides, I hope to even americans what he is saying is completely obvious. You understand the whole world follows your elections right? Whose fault is that???

    You are talking about decisions made by what seems to be an at least 48% insane people, which has repercussions for the fate of humanity, in various ways. People in the rest of the world have no choice but to pay attention and have opinions on it - please do not mistake it for adoration. Do a fucking better job america and you wont have the founder of linux saying mean things about you on the internet. Yes, I guess in the end it doesn't matter.

    --
    -
  86. Re:Romney *is* a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't ask Romney to fix kernel bugs just as I don't look to Linux for political advice. Both should stick to what they know.

    The issue is that the comments come from Linus' personal G+ page. If they should "stick to what they know", then you're implying censorship. Fuck that, and fuck you for implying it.

  87. Vote For Gary Johnson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linus doesn't know they're both puppets of the same master? I thought he was smarter than that.

  88. equal standards or typical left leaning bias? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where was Linus when Obama was caught going to the right reverend Wright's hate church in Chicago for years, or decades? Is that just fine and dandy with him? I guess so, 'cause Obama is a democrat...

  89. Self censorship is becoming essential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If this was Brazil, he'd be in jail for mocking politicians.
    We had only a couple of days, a paper outlawing 'language abuse' in the EU as an anti-terror move. Requiring filtering, automatic language detection, crimes for saying things. Torvalds should be glad he is free to call Mitt Romney bat shit crazy, and I for one will defend his right to say it.

    http://www.edri.org/files/cleanIT_sept2012.pdf

    Read it, and before anyone says it was just a discussion document, it's not, it's a concrete set of action points in a secret document to which the UK police have already committed themselves.

  90. Additionally... by bmo · · Score: 2

    >(a suggestion which some, including Snopes.com, have taken as a joke)

    Snopes quotes The Blaze.

    The Blaze is hardly unbiased. It is the mouthpiece of Glenn Beck. If The Blaze announced that there would be a full moon in the next month or that the sun would rise in the morning, I would check astronomical tables (or use Stellarium) to make sure.

    --
    BMO

  91. So I watched the video... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was some NBC feed from Rachel Maddow. Having never seen that show before and having a strong distaste for politics and talking heads, I have concluded that:

    a) He was joking.
    b) Rachel Maddow is a bitch.
    c) Linus probably got his opinion from her.

    I don't support Romney or his religion, but I think Linus needs to chill out and not watch so much Rachel Maddow. That is one frustrated lesbian...

    1. Re:So I watched the video... by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 2

      I watched the video too, and it's far from clear he's joking. I'd hope he was joking, but I was expecting him to go "because there's no oxygen out there" or something. Or to cue it as a joke and give time for a reaction. If it was a joke, he needs to hire better speechwriters or stop trying to ad-lib when he's obviously got no sense of humor and zero sense of comedic timing.

  92. Open Windows, Pomeranians, Hurricanes & Bonanz by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 2

    Way back yonder when I was a kid, me mum, father, the pomeranian and I were flying a Beechcraft Bonanza back from Miami in a weak hurricane. They were up front and I was in the back seat. For some reason or another I ended up holding the dog. As a kid, I had a tendency to fiddle with things, sometimes without regard to what they were. I had been fiddling with the window latch for a while, when suddenly, it actually opened. I completely froze, shocked and confused. The dog, with its sensitive ears began wailing horribly. My father, who was prone to anger, began yelling terribly too. A chorus of woe began as I sat there frozen with fright and guilt. My mum, the calmer of the bunch (the dog was a bit hyper too) began lurching toward me to close the window. Until she eventually succeeded in her efforts, the sound of the wind and screeching dog and yelling father went on for what seemed a bitter long time. I think even my mum began shrieking at my father before things were sorted out. It was a mess and I'd have a sore ass for it later.

    Moral of the story? Opening windows during low-altitude flights can be interesting, but I'd rather it have been Linux.

    --
    Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
  93. dear linus america is free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are free not to use it.
    Don't mistake your robot fans coming to your defense as approval.
    In the USA we tend to let people excercise religious freedom.
    We have plenty of arguments, but we tend to view individuals that target an entire group of people with boorish comments as Nazi loving assholes.
    Just remember we have troops deployed over their just in case one of you cocksuckers start that shit again.
    P.s. go kill yourself you fat socialist pig.

  94. Re:Romney *is* a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The airplane you opened that window in was not pressurized. Airplanes that fly over 12,500 feet must have pressurized cabins, or supplemental oxygen from a breathing mask. The lack of air pressure makes it difficult or impossible to receive oxygen in non pressurized cabins. Opening a windows or a door at altitude while the cabin is pressured would be very bad, and dangerous.

    Flying small airplanes or helicopters at low altitude with open doors, windows or doors removed is not a problem at all. I do it all the time.

    Mythbusters did an episode where they tested pressurized cabin breaches, and it wasn't as catastrophic as I expected, but it would definitely cause an early landing.

  95. Re:Romney *is* a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Both should stick to what they know.

    Bollocks. Everybody should speak about politics if they feel like it, democracy works better that way.

  96. Re:or just by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe the motherf***cker is just telling it like it is? I mean, yes, most religions are batsh*t crazy and in America, anything except Catholic, Protestant, or a direct, Jesus-wrote that sh*t his-self, fer sure, is just not going to fly.

    Everyone can plainly see that everyone else's religion is just a bunch of hooey.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  97. Re:Romney *is* a moron by interval1066 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've opened the window on a plane.

    You've opened the window on a PRIVATE plane, and at low altitude. Or in some Eastern European budget crackpot "airline"; You CANNOT open the window on a modern commercial US airliner. Even so, having just watched the Romney gaff, a few comments. It doesn't look to me like Romney is joking, on the other hand, it doesn't look like a studious, contemplative comment either. Romney, whatever he is, is not a guy who needs to be aware of how windows on a modern airliner work. Ok, he's stupid, I get that. But this isn't an indicator of how stupid he is. Its an indicator of how careless he is about everyday crap, just like 90% of the public. He doesn't really need to know precisiely how airliner windows work, so he doesn't. Ask him anything about money and I bet he could tell you a few things that Obama couldn't. Torvalds is out of line here.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  98. He did offer a retraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He did post a retraction when he figured out Romney was just joking

  99. Re:Ask Mark Twain about calling a thing by its nam by poly_pusher · · Score: 2

    As an atheist I have to disagree with you. Mormonism is bat shit crazy, as opposed to the other 3 primary Judeo-Christian religions which are just bullshit crazy...

  100. Snopes on the window comment by rjh · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.snopes.com/politics/romney/windows.asp

    Per Snopes, although it is true that Romney made that remark, it was clearly told as a joke meant to lighten the mood. It was not a serious comment.

    1. Re:Snopes on the window comment by Hardhead_7 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Per my eyes and ears, no, he wasn't joking.

    2. Re:Snopes on the window comment by Holi · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that, when he said it, it really didn't sound like he was trying to make a joke. neither his delivery nor the context of it seemed like a man joking.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    3. Re:Snopes on the window comment by brindafella · · Score: 1

      Oh, so making a joke that could bring down an airliner is OKAY if you are a candidate for the US presidential election; but, not if you are a passenger. http://rt.com/usa/news/tsa-shirt-arijit-delta-308/

      --
      Looking at space, radio, science and computing from a 'down-under' amateur enthusiast perspective.
    4. Re:Snopes on the window comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what?

      logically, in

      A IMPLIES B

      B can be TRUE even if A is FALSE.

      So Linus is still correct even if Romney only jokingly said what he said or even said nothing at all.

    5. Re:Snopes on the window comment by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      http://www.snopes.com/politics/romney/windows.asp

      Per Snopes, although it is true that Romney made that remark, it was clearly told as a joke meant to lighten the mood. It was not a serious comment.

      You can ask to any politician dating back to Roman republic, a politician should not "play fool" as a joke. Some may take it seriously.

  101. A common viewpoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Foreigners are often flabbergasted as to the things US politicians say and do. It seems absolutely incredible, and completely ridiculous, that our politicians are so incredibly ignorant and uneducated on very simple matters. We've had a number of Republican politicians boast about their lack of education and cite their ignorance as a strength.

    Linus is just expressing his disbelief that a man who is running for President of the United States has no idea how cabin pressurization works.

    Remember, Romney was the same person who was upset that Democrats wanted all Americans to get a college education. It's hard to find people in any first-world country that share that viewpoint, though an anti-education standpoint is common in third world countries (and many parts of America, like Texas).

  102. The Daily Show is not a news program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither is the Huffington Post a newpaper.
    Wasn't that on the citizenship test?
    YHBT. YHL. HAND.

  103. Re:Is this any worse than RMS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hearsay.

  104. The Truth is the Truth, Regardless of the Source by Otis+B.+Dilroy+III · · Score: 1

    My mothers side of the family all belong to the Moron church. A nuttier, greedier, more inbred bunch you will never find.

  105. Re:Ask Mark Twain about calling a thing by its nam by jrumney · · Score: 1

    Didn't hurt Mark Twain's reputation much.

    Yes, but that is not an equivalent situation to what TFS proposes. You'd have to ask whether Mark Twain being outspoken about matters outside the world of fiction reflects badly on the literary community that he is an icon of. This is even more ridiculous than suggesting that stating obvious facts hurts his personal reputation.

  106. how is by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

    Mormonism any more bat shit crazy than other mainstream flavors of Christianity (or other religions for that matter)? Is it just because they say crazy things happened recently rather than 2000 years ago? I would think parting the red sea, raising the dead, raining frogs etc would be more bat shit crazy than some random dude getting some golden plates and translating them. Religions claim crazy things and require followers to do crazy things with no evidence just "you got to have faith". If you believe that stuff fine, but looking at it from a scientific mindset makes it extremely unlikely/odd behaviour.

    1. Re:how is by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Mormonism any more bat shit crazy than other mainstream flavors of Christianity (or other religions for that matter)?

      Yes.

      Is it just because they say crazy things happened recently rather than 2000 years ago?

      Nope, that has nothing to do with it. Ignoring the rest of your post as you seem to be rebutting an argument no one is making.

      Believing God can perform miracles and cause crazy shit to happen is one thing. Believing you can perform miracles and cause crazy shit to happen (ala Pentecostals and such) is, in many people's opinions, an order of magnitude more crazy. Believing you can become a God is, in the opinions of many, another order of magnitude of craziness beyond that. Welcome to Mormon territory...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    2. Re:how is by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      Mah still don't see a lot of difference. Most christians believe that God/holy spirit comes into them when they become a christian (when that happens varies). Somehow an omnipresent God is more in you than anywhere else I guess after conversion. We are created in God's image but not capable of making a rational judgement about things but should just believe, etc.

      Pentacostals: well ... christians in the book of Acts were able to do things (supposedly even more than Jesus's miracles) but it mentions that these things will pass way. I guess pentacostals think it hasn't passed away yet where as the majority of christians do.

      Once you allow for the irrational anything goes. I can heal you. If you don't get healed it isn't because I can't heal you it's just you must not have believed enough, or perhaps God wants you to suffer for some purpose we don't understand, or ... Once you separate cause and effect from reason it doesn't much matter to me whether the miracles happened in the past or the present batshit crazy still applies.

  107. It was obvious from his tone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It was obvious from his tone in the video (and from body language, and from his laughing while saying it) he was joking.

    Maybe he was being deadpan link, but he's still a 'a fucking moron' and Mormonism is still 'batshit crazy. link

  108. Re:I would not be surprised if he got death threat by Seeteufel · · Score: 0

    From a European perspective Republicans are not conservative but mud-slinging extremists. Conservatives from a European perspective are nice old guys who go hunting in the woods, dress well and preserve the values of their community. Conservatives leave mud-slinging to the lefties.

  109. Re:He actually apologized (not) by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Damn it!
    I hate to have to retract my statement after it has already gone +5 Informative. But it was technically incorrect. He didn't actually apologize. What he said was:

    Ok, since I publicly called the guy a f*cking moron, I guess I should also publicly follow up: it does seem Romney was joking. Whew.

    Which my brain, fluent in Torvaldish, automatically translated into the English

    I am ever so sorry, it seems I have wronged you my good sir. My deepest apologies etc. etc.

    --
    If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
  110. One of us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linus is one of us, and he speaks like us.

  111. Technically speaking by thomst · · Score: 5, Informative

    Technically speaking, the poster is incorrect in referring to Linus Torvalds's comments as "profanity". They are, instead, vulgarity (common or coarse language), rather than profanity (language which demeans the sacred).

    Hey ... I'm a writer. I can't help myself.

    --
    Check out my novel.
    1. Re:Technically speaking by artor3 · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't calling a religion "batshit crazy" qualify as both vulgar and profane? Or is "profanity" specific to using religious words (e.g. damn, hell, etc.) as curses?

    2. Re:Technically speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He says that a religion is stupid. Doesn't that "demean the sacred"?

    3. Re:Technically speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republicans would disagree with your rebuttal. After all, slandering their Romney is like insulting a Muslim's Allah...

    4. Re:Technically speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you're a motherfucking Catholic and believe fucking = marriage = magic holy sacrament only Catholics can partake of -- that makes it profanity.

    5. Re:Technically speaking by thomst · · Score: 1

      artor3 inquired:

      Wouldn't calling a religion "batshit crazy" qualify as both vulgar and profane? Or is "profanity" specific to using religious words (e.g. damn, hell, etc.) as curses?

      Since the "simple" definition of profanity is irreverance, then, yes: vulgar and profane.

      Cursing is yet another form of malediction, the specific meaning of which is "to place a curse on [a person, place, or thing]."

      i.e. - "Damn you," or "To Hell with you," or "May the fleas of a thousand camels infest your armpits," etc.

      --
      Check out my novel.
    6. Re:Technically speaking by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Jesus fucking christ.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:Technically speaking by Kirth · · Score: 1

      Not even this. Because he wrote "f*cking", and not "fucking".

      --
      "The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
    8. Re:Technically speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a time when human intimate relations were (and by some still are) considered sacred. So the f-word, which demeans those relations, could still be considered profane.

    9. Re:Technically speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you consider sex to be sacred....

  112. Re:Ask Mark Twain about calling a thing by its nam by SternisheFan · · Score: 2
    I like Twain's synopsis:

    " The Mormon Bible is rather stupid and tiresome to read. But there is nothing vicious in its teachings. Its code of morals is unobjectionable. It's smooched from the New Testament and no credit given."

  113. SOPA/PIPA, ACTA, TPP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but what about these crazy copyright laws? Have they been at issue at all? How come everybody is talked about Madonna's "black muslim" and Romney's "aircraft windows"?

    Now even Linus can't think of anything better than that too?

  114. Re:Romney *is* a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ok, he's stupid, I get that. But this isn't an indicator of how stupid he is. Its an indicator of how careless he is about everyday crap, just like 90% of the public. He doesn't really need to know precisiely how airliner windows work, so he doesn't. Ask him anything about money and I bet he could tell you a few things that Obama couldn't. Torvalds is out of line here."

    Look, there's two kinds of stupid: 1) stupid enough not to know things. Pretty much everybody fits into that category about something, which I think is your point; 2) too stupid to not realize you're *way* outside your area of expertise. That's a special kind of stupid. It's the kind of stupid that let's you make crazy suggestions to plumbers about plumbing, or aircraft engineers about aircraft design, when you don't know a fricking thing about those subjects.

    I'm not saying you can't stray outside your own area of expertise. After all, some really cool discoveries and ideas come from people doing so. But if you're standing up in front of a public audience *trying* to sound knowledgeable, then why the hell would you stray into areas far outside your area of expertise? Like I said, it's a special category of stupid. We all have limits, but most people recognize those limits. Some people don't. You'd think that politicians would be particularly cautious about not making it obvious they're over that line.

  115. He's from Finland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Even members of finnish government swears on public television from time to time.

    Paska, perkele, satana ..!! ;D

  116. There's plenty of REAL reasons to knock Willard. by jcr · · Score: 0

    I'm getting really fucking sick of the media trying nail candidates on trivia, while they ignore the most important reasons why neither of the Ruling Party candidates are fit to hold any position of public trust. He told a joke about aircraft windows which a bunch of left-wingers didn't get. Who fucking cares?

    THIS is one example why Willard's not fit to wield any governmental power ever again. This is depraved indifference to human suffering. I don't give a shit about him putting his dog on the roof of the car, and I don't give a shit about Obama eating dog meat.

    But even aside from their many character flaws, there's an overarching reason to reject the Ruling Party candidates, and that's that neither of them will ever concede that our government is too powerful, and that we need to drastically reduce its powers.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  117. Typical Leftie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What Torvald's words represent is the general intolerance of the left.
    Contrary to the spin, most of the hate is found in either democrats, liberals, or progressives.

  118. make up your own damn mind by CoderFool · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is both amusing and aggravating to me how many people fall for someone else's predigested spin on any topic you name from their favorite media source. It is also amusing an aggravating to me how you can't find unbiased reporting on anything. There seems to be so much hysteria in the news lately both about politics and mormons. It is also amusing an aggravating to me how much the people who preach tolerance and acceptance of all viewpoints almost immediately turn around and slam people they don't agree with, often using strong words to demonstrate their disgust and lack of tolerance and acceptance. Don't like Romney and think he's a moron? Whatever. He is richer and accomplished more as governor and as a businessman that most of the people that call him a moron. Want to call Obama a bozo. Whatever. He is rich and president of the united states, which is more than most of the people who call him a moron have accomplished. Want to call mormons a crazy religion with unbelievable stories and majic underwear and all that? Whatever. They must have something going for them if they have 15 million or so members across the world. I try to listen some to liberal media and some to conservative media and figure the truth is somewhere between each sides spin. If I want to know more about what Mormons really believe, I will read their Book of Mormon. If I want to know more about what Muslims really believe, I will read the Koran. I won't listen to the stupid rumors that seem to be prevalent in the media or comments.

    1. Re:make up your own damn mind by Revotron · · Score: 1

      Logic and reason? On MY Slashdot? You forget yourself, good sir!

      But seriously. Mod parent up. You seem to be a very wise and reasonable person and I respect you for your down-to-earth attitude and ideals.

    2. Re:make up your own damn mind by kennyjay · · Score: 1

      Now here is someone who is intellectually honest. I am a Mormon myself and believe that we stand or fall on the veracity of that book. All the criticism, ignorance of history, rabid hatred and misunderstanding of Joseph Smith, unwillingness to even consider that it could be true all have no significance if the book is true. 99.99 percent of the people frothing at the mouth in this forum have never cracked the cover. I personally have only met one man in my life who has honestly read the book and has not been convinced of its truth. Apart from 11 eyewitnesses, there have been amazing discoveries about the book over the last several decades such as word print analysis proving at least 27 distinct writers, as well as the discovery of ancient Hebrew writing style known as 'chiasmus' replete throughout the book. Chiasmus as a literary structure was unknown in Joseph's time. See this page for more scholarly research and a challenge to all the naysayers. http://www.jefflindsay.com/BOMchallenge.shtml Still, 'a man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still', so just read the book, then decide yourself. As for Mitt, I served for years as a Mormon bishop just as he did. Believe me, he has spent many hours without financial compensation helping the poor and needy, repairing marriages, working with and supporting troubled youth. He knows and understands poverty. He is a great man, a great problem solver and will reach across the aisle to create pragmatic compromises to get the job done for us and for our economy.

  119. Batshit crazy is a little harsh... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    "Barking mad" would have been more diplomatic and just as accurate.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    1. Re:Batshit crazy is a little harsh... by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      More accurate really, since bat shit is, well, just bat shit. It's not especially crazy. Whereas a dog suffering from hydrophobia might be considered "barking mad", and by analogy, Romney could be equated with that dog.

      The "fucking mor(m)on" quip though, is very hard to argue with.

  120. Re:Apparently They Think This Might Deter New User by plover · · Score: 1

    I'm sure if you read all of Steve Ballmer's personal e-mails and political statements you could say something equally vapid about Windows and all Microsoft products.

    This is Slashdot, home of vapid comments about Windows and all Microsoft products. Ironically, many Slashdot commenters also seem to make faith-based claims that Windows [ sucks | is not secure | is worse than $(RandomOS) | is bats??t crazy ]. Why waste time reading Ballmer's statements when it's so much easier to head straight to the profanity? (Actually, there is one good reason to read Ballmer's drivel: you might learn some new profanities!)

    --
    John
  121. Slashdot is on the story! by metrometro · · Score: 1

    Somewhat famous person uses profanity in ambiguously sourced Internet flame war, details as they emerge!

  122. Or... by NoMaster · · Score: 1

    "Is this just Linus being Linus? Or does such outspokenness on non-technical matters reflect poorly on the Linux community that Torvalds leads?"

    It's a natural result of spending too much time programming in C. You used boolean operators all the time, but forget it has no logical XOR...

    --
    What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  123. Does it really matter? by Andy+Prough · · Score: 0

    The Android kernel is used by a half-billion people every day, while Linus's version is actively used by a fraction of that. He's a "leader" of a project that is losing relevance on a global scale fairly quickly. If you want to talk about a real leader, shouldn't we be talking about the chief maintainer of the Android fork of the kernel? Whoever that is?

    1. Re:Does it really matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is doing just fine powering servers and supercomputers.

    2. Re:Does it really matter? by Andy+Prough · · Score: 0

      Linux is doing just fine powering servers and supercomputers.

      You are proving my point - Headless servers and supercomputers aren't a "community".

    3. Re:Does it really matter? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      You are proving my point - Headless servers and supercomputers aren't a "community"

      Are you trying to say I am not part of the Linux community because I run headless servers?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  124. Linus a "Public Figure" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When has Linus been on Leno or SNL? Linus maybe a leader of the technology world but he's hardly a public figure. Then again nothing he said takes a technical genius to figure out. Romney is a fucking moron and batshit crazy to boot. A shame that political discourse in America makes these attributes virtues.

  125. argh... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    Is this just Linus being Linus? Or does such outspokenness on non-technical matters reflect poorly on the Linux community that Torvalds leads?

    For fuck's sake, what a bunch of politically-correct cowardice! How about "Option C: Such truthfulness [on Linus's part] is fucking refreshing."

  126. Damn It, Jim! by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    He's a politician, not an aircraft engineer! Being a Mormon, he doesn't seem like the kind of person who would go to see one of those movies where someone gets sucked out of an aircraft. Or... pretty much anything that didn't feature Jesus. Mitt Romney is NOT the kind of person who would see Fight Club! And definitely not the kind of person to talk about it with!

    And really, how many average citizens do you know who really know anything about pressurized cabins and air pressure at jet airliner cruising altitude? Especially with the state of science education in this country. Hell I'd be surprised if half of them didn't think you could fly that jet airliner to the moon. A lot of responses to his statement seem to be based on movie physics. Sure, "opening a window" would cause the cabin to depressurize... somewhat... catastrophically... but the airframe would likely handle it. Everyone would have to wear oxygen masks while the pilot made a dive to breathable air, and an emergency landing. I'm not even sure if the loss of cabin pressure would give anyone the bends. That'd be what I'd be worried about.

    I'm sure he was somewhat freaked out because his wife was in a moderately-bad aircraft situation, and babbling. He seems to do that a lot. If he were to just stop and think for a second before opening his mouth, he'd save himself a lot of trouble. He and Biden have a lot in common in that respect.

    Nope, there are a lot of reasons not to like Romney, but this isn't one of them. Dislike him because he'll say whatever he thinks you want to hear in order to get elected. Dislike him because as a member of the wealthy elite, he's actively participated in the creation of laws and tax code that help people like him get richer and everyone else in the country get poorer. Dislike him because he is at best a liar and at worst a hypocrite (He's reversed pretty much EVERY position he held when he was Governor of Massachusetts.) Dislike him because he at best has no idea what it's like to live with an income of less than $250K a year and at worst is contemptuous of anyone who makes such a pittance. But don't hate him because of comments he made while legitimately concerned about his wife. That's probably as close as you will ever be allowed to get to the real Mitt Romney.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  127. Irrelevant to the Linux community. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is irrelevant to the Linux community what Linus says about non-Linux matters.
    Linus is entitled to have a personal opinion and has the right to express it freely.

  128. What does Linus stand for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Linus is against everything the Mormons stand for, that means he's pro-theft, pro-murder, pro-adultery, anti-religion, anti- freedom of religion, anti-Christian, pro- drug dealer, pro-rape, pro-bestiality, anti-education, anti-family, anti-government, pro-crime, anti-Bible, pro-terrorism, and pro-monopoly. For that matter, maybe he likes to strangle puppies, and steal candy from babies. Religion? He's a fanatic member of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. He's definitely not bats**t crazy like other people, so we better trust his suggestions in politics ;-)

  129. Re:Ask Mark Twain about calling a thing by its nam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd have to ask whether Mark Twain being outspoken about matters outside the world of fiction

    He was outspoken about matters outside the world of fiction? Oh, wait, I guess there was the one time he wasn't dead. That was pretty good. And the one about golf.

  130. Romney is a swine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Romney is elected, the US will be in serious trouble.

    Sure, Obama did not do everything he promised, but his heart is
    in the right place and that is obvious to anyone who has been
    watching.

    Romney on the other hand is the kind of piece of shit who didn't think twice
    about carrying his family pet on the roof of the car for hundreds of miles.
    What the fuck kind of subhuman idiot does that ?

  131. Well, he was misquoted, but... by Tore+S+B · · Score: 2

    The problem with Mitt is that it wasn't clear that it was a joke.

    There are two problems, one minor, one severe, which caused this:

    One, he's not the funniest man in the world. That's fine. People are voting for a politican, and a great sense of humour and delivery - although useful, is not a prerequisite.

    The second problem is the real one: He has said - and is running on a platform of! - so many so profoundly stupid things that it was in no way clear that he didn't sincerely mean this to be true.

    --
    toresbe
  132. I'm Confused... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...when you say "cult," are you referring to Mormonism or Linux?

    1. Re:I'm Confused... by Stormthirst · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes

  133. Fuck your community. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, the most important thing is making a bunch of virginal jackoffs look bad. Hey fuckwads, try showering, shaving the fucking neckbeard, dusting the Cheetos futz off your fucking fingers, going outside, and talking to real people instead of fucking yourself in the ass with the latest shitsucking fucking useless Linux distro that's going to be abandoned by your pathetic "community" whenever they decide to upgrade anything at all ever. Fuck your "community" you fat worthless sacks of fucking shit.

  134. This is a slashdot story? Seriously? by Vellmont · · Score: 1

    Linus has never really minced words. He's not really beholden to anyone, and nobody is really paying attention (except strangely Slashdot). I realize Slashdot jumped the shark a while ago, but this story is just further confirmation of it.

    --
    AccountKiller
  135. Your opinion, while interesting, is irrelevant by mclaincausey · · Score: 1

    Public figures are not allowed to have personal opinions or to voice them frankly!!! /. Which one is running for office? Linus can call whoever he wants whatever he wants. Is he expected to abide by a monklike silence on issues beyond Linux? At least it wasn't as off-color as some of RMS's impolitic remarks--which he also had every right to say.

    --
    (%i1) factor(777353);
    (%o1) 777353
  136. Re:Romney *is* a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except politics (the life of the city if you had followed Greek 101) is EVERYBODY's business, and if you (as in all of you who apparently think it nobody's business to talk about politics) had taken a keener interest in the way our country has been run in the last 50 years, we would be in much better shape.

      With love,

      The ones who thinks we should take a keen interest in politics and speak up when we have something to say

  137. Re:There's plenty of REAL reasons to knock Willard by bmo · · Score: 1

    >THIS [youtube.com] is one example why Willard's not fit to wield any governmental power ever again.

    That and the video of him with the Vietnam veteran who is gay, who when asked about gay marriage, Mitt spouted off the teabilly talking point about "marriage between a man and a woman."

    Total lack of empathy. Because heaven forfend that he say something that doesn't piss off his "base" for being thoughful.

    He has spent the entire campaign running *against* his record as Governor of MA. It's fake, and everyone sees it as fake. He is the fakest candidate that ever faked a fake. Ronnie Raygun was the Teflon Prez, but Mitt is the Plastic Man.

    --
    BMO

  138. *YAWN* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't tell jokes if you're a conservative. The media will run stories claiming that you were serious, and thus you are a moron.

  139. Re:Romney *is* a moron by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    He knows how to get a person to vote for the opposition.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  140. Just for a bit of balance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an aerospace engineer, I am neither surprised nor dismayed that Romney may not know why you cannot open an airliner window in flight... I suspect that Obama (who thought we had 57+ states, thinks navy medics are "corpse men", thinks doctors cut off feet rather than healing diabetics because the docs get more money that way, etc) also would not know about plane windows (I bet some staffer has had this explained to him now so he can pretend to be smart). Politicians are generally not engineers and often lack any technical education at all... On those occasions when America has elected an engineer (Herbert Hoover, Jimmy Carter) things have not turned out very well. In fact, most people I meet on a day-to-day basis would not know why you cannot open a plane window in flight and actually think a nutjob on a plane could open a door in flight... hint: look at the way the door opens, consider the square inches, figure the pressure differential and do a little math.

    That said, guys like Torvalds and Nye are just behaving like political dirtbags pushing their particular political agendas, or they would slam Democrats just as harshly. Obama claims to be a Christian, and has many times proclaimed his admiration for Islam... he is not attacked. Is this because they know he is lying about his religious beliefs or is it that they are fine with those beliefs...as long as you are a lefty? Obama ran in 2008 as opposed to gay marriage and was still opposed in 2011. In 2012 Romney is a barbarian for being opposed to gay marriage? Obama expresses his appreciation for the prophet Mohammed and he is cool, but Romney has some Mormon prophet and he is a backward moron?

    I am all for criticizing anybody who is arrogant enough to run for political office and hold himself out as deserving to rule over others... but any time I see a critic who attacks only one side, or who only sees the screw-ups of one side I know I am dealing with somebody who is not intellectually honest

  141. Mormons, just take the second m out by Cute+and+Cuddly · · Score: 1

    They claim that mankind is only about 5000 years old and they are creationists. Do you really want to start defending that kind of stance? Anyone that comes up to me with something like that, I would send to a psychiatrist. If Linus said that, he has my full support (And I also run the OS he is responsible for)

    1. Re:Mormons, just take the second m out by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      While some may believe that its not church doctrine. Don't confuse us with the evangelicals. The one thing people don't get about mormonism is that it allows for a wide variety of different views. I'm personally an evolutionist who believes in an old earth and I'm far from the only one.

  142. Re:Romney *is* a moron by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    That was wonderful... Now can you link to a document that actually opens?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  143. One reason America is a GREAT place to live is by bennebw · · Score: 1

    we don't outlaw people from speaking their minds. That doesn't mean there won't be consequences, big, small, or other, whether it's Mitt Romney wanting to put electric windows on airplanes (evidently unashamed of his religion), or Obama and the religion that he evidently professes (but somehow escapes persecution for), or Linus displaying his apathy for what people think of his civility and creativity for insults, or the people here who find great sport and a common sense of moral and intellectual superiority in making fun of religion and religious people. Thankfully, our forefathers were intelligent enough (religious, though many of them were) to secure our rights to speak our minds (slander aside), and to secure our rights to practice religion (or not) as we see fit. They were also smart enough not to think they could protect us from ourselves, but they did try to protect us from each other and from an oppressive government. I'm glad to be an American and a Christian.

  144. Reflects poorly by bugnuts · · Score: 1

    When the chick fil'a dude said stuff about gays and his religion, it's the same thing. Because he mixed his (known) politics with his business, he lost my business.

    If torvalds posted this in a blog unrelated to Linux and was relatively unknown, no problem. If there's an association to Linux, it will be taken poorly. The problem is that torvalds can't say anything without it being associated with Linux. Welcome to celebrity status.

  145. Re:Romney *is* a moron by fustakrakich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He has a record of taking things that are failing and turning them around.

    What 'record' did you read? He runs an economic chop shop, runs up huge debts and then sells off the pieces and fires the workers. He's second hand 'Reaganomics'.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  146. This is Getting Ridiculous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and reaffirms why I keep distancing myself further from people. I am tired of every dope with a following thinking that he needs to share his politic thoughts. I have been a VERY politically active person and I am just getting sick of it. I can't wait for this election to be over so that I can get back to a sense of politics being inconsequential (even if it isn't). As much as I hate some things that are done by one side and others that are done by the other side, I just want to live my life and try not to let them impact me, as much as possible... it's hard enough already, and it is even worse when every @**hole with an opinion thinks that everyone else wants to hear it, celebrity, geek, or otherwise.

  147. romney is a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many americans do you think would be able to fit through an aircraft window?

  148. Re:Romney *is* a moron by OneAhead · · Score: 4, Informative

    Tsk, talking about confirmation bias.
    http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/09/26/obama_jumps_in_gallup_tracker.html
    http://www.gallup.com/poll/150743/Obama-Romney.aspx
    Oh... Gallup suddenly is not that credible anymore, is it?

  149. Re:Romney *is* a moron by gman003 · · Score: 1

    Quite a bit, evidently, given how much power he's obtained.

    Whether he knows anything about *governance*, though...

  150. Re:Romney *is* a moron by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    You CANNOT open the window on a modern commercial US airliner.

    Hello! Oh, wait... I didn't realize you said US airliner... never mind

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  151. Linus is NOT the Linux Community... by houbou · · Score: 1

    Why must we think that Linus' comment have anything to do with the Linux community? Freedom of speech, yes and he's entitled to it. However, if there is a perception that everytime the man speaks, he's the voice of the Linux community, then whoever think that needs something stronger than a pill. Anyways, I agree with Linus' comments and as far as I'm concerned, Romney is an idiot for making such suggestions. As for his religion, none of my business. But in the end, Romney made himself look like a joke. If this type of idea comes from a man wanting to be the 89th President of the USA, then he better not be elected or else the US will be in some serious deep s&^t. Aircraft windows opening in case of emergencies, what a moron! (mmm, mormon, moron, kinda rhymes), but let be serious, a comment like that is comparable to wanting to join the navy , wishing to serve aboard a submarine, but insisting on sleeping with your window open. Sheesh!

    1. Re:Linus is NOT the Linux Community... by GougeMan · · Score: 1

      I'm just saying for example, Bill Gates is (when it comes down to it) the voice of "Microsoft". What he says in public gives most people an image of what Microsoft is like (even if it is wrong) or they may harbor bad feelings or attitudes toward Microsoft because of what he said. It's just automatic perception. It's not right to do that, just human nature. (for most folks) So by that same token, technically, Linus is the voice of Linux. Some normal joe shmoe dude may read that and not have a clue what Linux is but because he read that Linus spouted off at the mouth like that, that Linux must be used by a bunch of smart mouths.. It's just perception.. that's all.. I hate it just as much as anyone else....

  152. Re:Ask Mark Twain about calling a thing by its nam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a loaded question. "Does it reflect badly and cause of loss of reputation", what... that someone calls a batshit crazy religion batshit crazy? Didn't hurt Mark Twain's reputation much.

    Unfortunately that is the judgment of history. I suspect Mark Twain's reputation at the time was somewhat worse. After time passes Linus's opinion might be judged to be quite true. Right now, Linus's statement is considered rather harsh.

  153. Re:Romney *is* a moron by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    Thats a window in the cockpit. Show me a US airliner that allows passengers to open their windows. Or do you just like to be a dick?

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  154. No by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    It reflects on him and him alone, if Linus said "I and all Linux users agree that ....." then he would of pulled everyone in. He never said that so therefore didn't make Linux look bad.

  155. George Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If Bush went on the soft-show circuit instead of meeting with foreign heads of state, ppl. like *you* and your ilk would jump on the internet post-haste and complain it about.

    Yes, *you would*, and you _know it_.

    1. Re:George Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you take the stance that if someone else does something shitty it gives you permission to also be shitty? Awesome mentality.

    2. Re:George Bush by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      If Bush went on the soft-show circuit instead of meeting with foreign heads of state, ppl. like *you* and your ilk would jump on the internet post-haste and complain it about.

      Yes, *you would*, and you _know it_.

      Oh, you mean like Bush's 2004 appearance on Dr. Phil? That kind of "soft-show"? That kind of waste of time? Maybe instead of campaigning Obama should be reading books with schoolchildren while the WTC burns.

      --

      Enigma

    3. Re:George Bush by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      " Maybe instead of campaigning Obama should be reading books with schoolchildren while the WTC burns."

      well i would say that
      1 staying in a SECURED LOCATION
      2 Finishing what he was doing at the time
      3 allowing all of his people to DO THEIR JOBS (and figure out WTF!? happened)

      was a smart thing to do

      All a President has to do truthfully is

      1 be smart enough to surround himself with Smart People
      2 know when to say NOTHING
      3 sign his name when needed

      Now if Romney calls his buddies from Boeing asking how 28000 and 29000 can have openable windows installed then we need to worry but otherwise a quick phone call from said buddies will explain why Open Windows + Airplane = BAD IDEA.

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  156. First of all ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... I take exception at Torvalds singling out Mormons as bat shit crazy. All religions are bat shit crazy. Each in their own very special way.

    Airplane windows do open The ones in the cockpit, that is. So the important people can get out. All you SLF can just stand in line for the emergency exits. Sort of like how the economy works.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  157. It is NOT obvious he was joking by runeghost · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's the video:
    http://www.politico.com/multimedia/video/2012/09/romney-airplane-windows-not-opening-a-real-problem.html

    Judge for yourself. My only comment is that IF he was joking, he really needs to work on his delivery.

    1. Re:It is NOT obvious he was joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the link.

      I would say : It looks like he's trying to make tell a joke, but he just sucks at it.
      He was making jokes, so his statement wouldn't have been serious . He just made the mistake of thinking it would be funny.
      It might have been funny, had he brought it better ( changing his intonation and facial expression would have made it funny ).

      Conclusion :
      - He has a weird sense of humor
      - He has bad performance skills
      - Linus' personal opinion on politics is his personal opinion. Everyone has one.

    2. Re:It is NOT obvious he was joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? I'm not American, certainly have rather liberal political views, but I watched the video and it _clearly_ shows that he's joking.

    3. Re:It is NOT obvious he was joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is a scientific illiterate, as 99.99% of politicians are. He thinks that air pressure and temperature at 30,000 feet are the same as at ground level, wherever he happens to be standing. He thinks the universe was created 6,000 years ago, and that god put dinosaur fossils on earth to test man's faith. He is clueless about the basic science that you and I learned in high school chemistry and physics. He thinks that if Congress passes a law stating that pi = 3.00, then that becomes the value of pi, inside the US, and that pi thereafter has a different value, depending on what country you're in.

      Lawyers have nothing at all in common with scientists and engineers, and the thought that they might have once had a career in science or engineering never crossed their mind. They got miserable grades in high school science, and the moment science classes were no longed required, they fled from them as fast as they could. On the topics of science and engineering, LAWYERS ARE AS STUPID AS ROCKS!!!

    4. Re:It is NOT obvious he was joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty clear that the "I don't know why they don't do that" about the windows opening was a quick joke inserted into the comments as an minor humorous aside, and the following "it's a real problem" was referring back to the preceding topic of smoke in the plane ('cause, you know, smoke on a plane *is* a real problem) and not the windows not opening. Visualize some commas or something if it helps.

      It's the sad nature of politics that when anyone, even someone as respected and intelligent as Torvalds, is very against a particular side or person on that side, they can go overboard due to misinterpretations.

  158. that's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that dude is a fucking moron, and luckily we can still call him mr. romney

  159. Re:Romney *is* a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly after four years of Obama, can't we all just agree to slap 'em in the face and vote 3rd party? We'd only need 35 percent of the vote to win, 40 to make it pretty sure, and 45 to cement it. And hell even 10-15 percent would at least get us a 3rd party funded for the 2016 elections. It's not like either side is going to be bailing enough water out in the next 4 years to turn things around.

  160. Religious Bigotry is Ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who thinks what Torvalds said was appropriate must have Aspergers or some other social disorder. Anti-Mormonism is Anti-Semitism 2.0 and it's repulsive.

  161. Re:or just by GerardAtJob · · Score: 2

    A religion is - imo- a way to control a mass of people by fear, and since so many people are ready to trust anything, it can only lead to mass stupidy and conflicts.

    I just wish that everybody could read between the lines of all thoses books and religious statements, and just find a good way of living WHILE using their brains and think for themselves.

    But I guess it's just a wish... not everyone was given a brain at birth ;)

    --
    I can't call that English ;-)
  162. nwerle by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

    Maybe Romney bet KK into Torvalds' trup QQ?

  163. Does this "news" story reflect poorly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... on this website? Yes. Yes it does.

    The idea that anything "reflects" on the Linux "community" is ridiculous. Linus can say whatever dumb thing he wants to say and it means absolutely squat to the "Linux community". They are entirely divorced.

    And both of those statements happen to be true by the way regardless of the reasoning.

  164. Re:Romney *is* a moron by swalve · · Score: 1

    I've heard that Romney's "tell" for when he is uncomfortable is to laugh. Partially because he can always claim that the next thing he vomits forth was "just a joke".

  165. Re:Romney *is* a moron by dbIII · · Score: 1

    He completed school, so it demonstrates very clearly that he's a guy that disn't listen back then and doesn't pay attention to the world around him now. Thus IMHO not Presidential material, but my opinion counts no more than that of Linus since your election is your own business, and that batshit insane money worshipper has shot down whatever slim chance he had by insulting half of the USA.

  166. Linus needs to chill by GougeMan · · Score: 1

    Since Linus is technically the leader of the Linux Community (if he wants to acknowledge it or not), he needs to understand that leaders can't go around loosing their cool like he has been doing the last few months. He is representing the entire Linux community (in essence) with anything that he says. Linus is a brilliant man, but needs to take it down a notch and be a little more responsible and use a little more tact. Again, one of the smartest guys on Earth, but needs to be a little more level headed sometimes. Just my take....

  167. the emperor really does have no clothes by cas2000 · · Score: 2

    why the fuck would telling the truth 'reflect poorly; on either Linus or the Linux community.

    Romney IS a fucking moron (or, at least, goes above-and-beyond to pander to morons that he is completely indistinguishable from one), and Mormonism IS batshit insane (as are all other religions, but Mormonism is pretty fucking crazy - not quite as crazy as scientology, but not far off it either. religion founded by a con-man, and only an idiot would believe the golden tablets story. the magic fucking underpants are laughable. what's not laughable are the nutcase patriarch survivalist forced-"marriage" rape compounds - i've got no problem with polygamy, or polygyny or any other form of polyamory but raping teenage girls is just unnacceptable)

  168. Re:Romney *is* a moron by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Nobody specified which window. You gotta problem? Or do you just like to be a...?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  169. Re:or just by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    A religion is - imo- a way to control a mass of people by fear, and since so many people are ready to trust anything, it can only lead to mass stupidy and conflicts.

    Apparently a lot of autocrats have said pretty much the same thing that everyone reviles Marx for saying. However, I can't imagine that every religious leader is in it for that reason. I suspect that the vast majority believe the teachings every bit as much as the masses do.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  170. Re:Romney *is* a moron by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    wouldn't doubt it.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  171. Re:Romney *is* a moron by tibit · · Score: 1

    Hear, hear.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  172. I'll respect his opinion on this subject when by habib23 · · Score: 1

    He grows balls big enough to say that Islam is batsh*t crazy. Just as many good reasons to say this about Islam as there are about Mormonism. But he won't. No one will. Because then muslims will start killing people.

    The NEA funded Andres Serrano and 'Piss Christ' (crucifixes in urine jars for those who don't remember) in 1987. Barely a murmur from the christians, and then it was only about why should we have to pay for this blashphemy. Some douche makes a youtube video about Islam and the pundit class (I'm looking at you MSNBC) talks about how he should be crucified.

      Seriously, I actually have no problem with *whatever* someone wants to believe, but hurt feelings do not justify violence. And fear definitely doesn't justify silencing people, however batsh*t crazy they are. Because your beliefs (or lack thereof) look just that way to someone else.

    It's easy to talk smack about folks you know won't hit you. Takes some balls to say it about someone you are pretty sure will.

    Grow a pair Linus.

    --
    wake up and find out that you are the eyes of the world.
    1. Re:I'll respect his opinion on this subject when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see your point...but this is about Romney...who is a Mormon...and not Islam. Why would he feel compelled to talk about something irrelevant to him? Frankly, who is to say that he hasn't mentioned something about Islam being batshit? It seems that there are more L.T. articles in the last few year than there were in the last twenty...and none of them about technical advancement...just personal opinions. Weird.

  173. Re:or just by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> Everyone can plainly see that religion is just a bunch of hooey.

    FTFY

  174. underwear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They believe in magic underwear, ffs!

  175. Experience not faith by dbIII · · Score: 0

    We work with the stuff and call it how we see it.
    It's been a letdown all the way from Applesoft BASIC (versus the non-Microsoft integer BASIC), to the pisspoor ripoff of a little bit of what CP/M could do, to many of their current products (eg. MS Exchange tells you what you should do with the software just by it's name).

  176. Re:or just by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    motherf***cker
    batsh*t
    sh*t

    Either curse or don't, but don't do what you just did. You know what the word means, the reader knows, so it only makes reading more difficult without any benefit.

  177. Don't you Americans know your own history by dbIII · · Score: 1

    He didn't just write fiction, he was a journalist more than he was an author but it's the novels he's more famous for now.
    "Roughing It" was most definitely mostly fiction (Buffalo don't climb trees) and that's one novel where he made a lot of fun of the early Mormons.

  178. Torvalds translates to turd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL. I'm glad that I don't support Linux dick heads any longer.

  179. Norwegian chimes in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Applause for Torvald. He speaheth the truth, like every true Finn.

    Keep it up!

    Love from Norway!

  180. ICYMI, some jets have windows that open inflight by Marble68 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Boeing 737 and Airbus 320 for example.

    If he wasn't joking: For venting smoke, the airbus manual says (or used to say) you have to reduce speed to below 200 knots. You should be at low altitude, of course.

    Despite studies showing these it not much good in venting this way, crews still desire to do it.

    I looked and Romney didn't say anything about " passengers rolling down the windows at 30,000 feet and at 500 knots."

    That's just wild ass charicature circle jerking. What he said was that they (FAA? Manufacturer? Leasor?) should allow it. He might have been reflecting the crew's sentiments.

    Venting air via an open window could be done using air rams to maintain pressure. The FAA doesn't like the planes slowing down and dropping altitude to do it for delayed landing, reduced cummonication, and analysis of In effectiveness.

    Wide body jets are particularly bad aerodynamically to allow venting based on studies.

    planes in the US May have their windows bolted shut, I don't know about that.

    But I do know that even today there are planes evenin commercial service that have windows that can be opened in flight and older flight manuals gave instructions on how to do it in the event of smoke or fire. (btw, fire can be bad because the vacuum can pull it into other areas of the plane).

    Anyway, I don't get Linus' reaction as I when I read the quote in the la times I immediately thought I understood what he was saying.

    The planes are made with opening windows, but I don't know

    --
    /me sips his coffee and ponders a new sig...
  181. Brilliant by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Sure, ask the /. community if they think "someone ridiculing a Republican" is wrong.

    Yeah, you're going to get nothing but cogent, reasoned responses.
    No partisanship here, move along.

    --
    -Styopa
  182. Who fucking cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This Ivory puritanism is disgusting. Every C-level person I have met who wasn't a dipshit...cussed. Big deal. Dropping the f-bomb or calling someone a moron is either a) free speech b) an opinion. Grow up. Is it "professional"? Ask a CEO who has been through the wringer a few times if they have ever cussed. Christ, Mother Teresa shit everyday. This is a) a religious carry over b) oversensitve c) further emasculation of the American (and Finnish) male d) all of the above.

    Fucking and Moron are words. Use them. Moron, you should be fucking more.

    1. Re:Who fucking cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. It's like saying you can have free speech but don't tweet it or publish it. It's not like he said "Terminate all [religions]" or something. If he thinks Romney is a fucking moron, fine. Tweet away. If he thinks (or says) Romney his opinion is Romney is a procreating fucktard...I'm fine with that too. It should be anyone's right to publicly or personally express an opinion...even if it was OMG PONY SWEARS! Damn Filthy Finns.

      New meme bitch!

  183. Mormonism? by microbee · · Score: 1

    The whole summary made so much more sense until I realized it was not "Moronism".

  184. Campaign Season in USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Robin: 'Batman ... sure is a lot of Bat-shit flinging around ... is the toilet acting up again?

    Batman: 'Robin ... No. The Bat-Toilet is functioning properly and my Bat-Bladder is nominal
    in its functional capabilities as well.

    Bat-Radar indicates far-field sources ... meaning we are under their path ... an a good thing!'

    Robin: 'WoW Batman ... you really are on TOP of this Shit!'

    Batman does not smile ... yet ... the curves of his face below the his mask indicates he is
    hummered and pleased by Robin's crude comments, which were entirely accurate and
    precise and 'on the mark'.

    Alfred

  185. Re:or just by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget the mormons, lets all shit on the Quakers and the Amish now. Cause, you know, that's cool. I know because I can put it on my blog and /b/ and they'll tell me I'm cool.

  186. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when is an individual not allowed to have a personal opinion?

    Moving on...

  187. Submitter should die in a fire. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this horseshit? The entirety of the Linux "community" does not reside in the US, nor does Linus "lead" said community. Rather than ask Slashdot whether we give a shit about Linus' political opinions, perhaps the submitter could and should retract said ridiculous questions and promptly die in a fire.

  188. He's entitled to his opinion by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2

    Unless he's become naturalized, he's still a Finnish citizen, so all he can add is commentary. I happen to agree with him, but he'd come out in support of Romney, my response would have been the same. He's just one human being among 9 billion with an opinion. Whatever.

    As for the substance of what he said... Well... Every time you see Romney on T.V... Just remember... under his clothes, he's wearing magic underwear...seriously.
    Look up the core tenants of what Mormons believe and then ask yourself... Does this guy really believe this? If so, do you think he's more or less so suited to our next president?

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    1. Re:He's entitled to his opinion by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Torvalds became a US citizen and registered voter in 2010.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  189. What gives you the right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this just Linus being Linus? Or does such outspokenness on non-technical matters reflect poorly on the Linux community that Torvalds leads?"

    Is this netbuzz just being netbuzz? Or does such outspokenness on personal choices of people reflect poorly on the slashdot community that Torvalds leads?"
    No body has the right to tell linus what he should restrict himself to except himself

  190. Mormonism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Linus saying that Mormonism is anything but batshit crazy would be a poor reflection on Linus. Magic Underwear, just let those 2 words sink into your conscious for a moment. They exist and Mormons wear them for protection. Joseph Smith did time for fraud before he took a page from William Miller's book and decided if one guy could convince a group of people to wait for the end on a mountain top they would fall for damn near anything. That is the spirit in which the Mormon religion started, gather up all the stray gullible morons you can find and convince them that god said they need to give you money. All you need is the promise of everlasting life as a god, with a planet, and all the women you could possibly want, to screw for eternity and populate your planet. Linus didn't go far enough by half.

    1. Re:Mormonism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose that might be true if Mormons actually wore "magic underwear" but they don't. Saying that Mormons wear "magic underwear" is like saying that orthodox Jews with yamulkes are wearing "magic beanie caps."

      I'm a Mormon. I don't wear magic underwear. I wear garments under my street clothes who's entire purpose is solely to remind me of covenant made to obey God. Period. Any protection derived from them is entirely spiritual in the form of helping me make right choices in the face of temptation to make wrong choices. Said garments won't stop bullets, knifes, or any other physical objects any more than your boxers (or tidy whities) and we don't claim otherwise. Any stories that claim otherwise usually start with "I know a guy who has a friend, who has a cousin who..." and most of us Mormons lump them in the category of faith-promoting rumors not to be taken seriously.

      The fact that you refer to them as "magic underwear" tells me immediately that you don't know what you're talking about and the source for your views are anti-Mormons who are determined to ridicule Mormons by intentionally maligning and misrepresenting what we believe. Accordingly, nothing else you have to say on the subject carries any validity or currency whatsoever. In short, you don't know what you're talking about.

    2. Re:Mormonism by neminem · · Score: 1

      Nobody? -Plenty- of people believe Catholicism is "batsh**t crazy". Plenty of people believe -all- organized religion is. Obviously there are gradations of just how crazy they are, and Mormonism is one of the crazier ones (though it still pales in comparison to Scientology, crazy-wise), but still.

    3. Re:Mormonism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well right. Myself being an atheist can relate that all organized religion is batshit crazy, but that's from my personal view. I really just didn't want to offend anyone. I can say, it's a little ironic but I've sat in a Mormon church, Reformed church, Catholic church, Buddhist and Taoist temples, etc. I found the eastern religions to be the most grounded and relatable at a personal level in that they're much more about inner peace than a righteous lord to save us from our sins (that we will continue to commit and ask forgiveness for until the end of time). Given that, I still don't believe in any of them. I just admired the eastern ones in particular.

  191. It reflects VERY poorly on the Linux community by elabs · · Score: 0

    Every time a technical company/organization takes sides on social issues, they alienate roughly half of the population (at least in the US where we have a two-party system). Tech organizations should stay out of social issues, period.

  192. its the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    why sugar coat it

  193. I work with lots of Mormons by elabs · · Score: 2

    ...and the majority seem to be Linux fans. I wonder how they're going to take this. I'm always trying to sway them to Windows and maybe I'll have more success now.

    1. Re:I work with lots of Mormons by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      I doubt it, we're use to this kind of abuse; and besides if we're smart enough to be Linux users we're smart enough to know that this is just Linus being Linus.

  194. But we're talking about Romney by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    and not some lame attempts at his apologists to try to make this turd stink any less than he already does.

  195. Re:Romney *is* a moron by Jaime2 · · Score: 2

    I've opened the side door of a plane at 15,000 feet. It's standard operating procedure for skydiving.

  196. Not funny, insightful. by formfeed · · Score: 1

    Nonsense. He took lessons in standup from Al Gore.

    Remember Gore running for president and taking Lieberman as VP. Tailoring his remarks, so he would sound more conservative than he really is?

    There were Bush = Gore = Bore jokes. And Mittens is pulling a Gore right now by letting his advisers tell him where he stands.

  197. Linus / Romney's Aircraft windows by rjbradlow · · Score: 1

    What's the BFD? Really!? Nobody is perfect and even Linus can fire off before thinking.

    But, if we think about Romney's suggestion and put some logic behind the idea, it's not that stupid after all.

    Tell me what existing portal or hatch can be opened during flight now.
    And why they cannot be opened during flight.

    Simple; It would depressurize the cabin and cause serious problems ... Right?

    So, why then would the obvious reason Linus thought this was a stupid idea be valid?
    Would they not implement the same safety features used on the rest of the openings?

    I'm sure passengers and staff won't just be able to open the damn things at will during a flight to flick ashes out. - as if.

    Naturally if such a thing came to pass, they would not be able to be opened until safety sensors allow it.
    Be it altitude, barometric pressure, and/or inertia that would all have to be within certain parameters before the window emergency escape latches would be allowed to function.

    Say the pilots managed to land without too much damage and there were survivors onboard...
    Naturally if you are on the ground in a burning tube or in the water and sinking, wouldn't you want as many exits as possible?

    So, just because these 2 guys are under the microscope, doesn't mean they are any more or less human than the rest of us.

    They just have enough balls to stand in front of everyone and speak their minds.

    It never ceases to amaze me how quick the village idiots grab their pitch forks, er, um, I mean the masses are to crucify others.

  198. Re:Romney *is* a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pussy. "Hear, fucking Hear!" FTFY

    Hellen Keller would have said, "MOAN GROANNN NN MOAN"

  199. What was Linus did.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    umm....naahh..should've done the same earlier.

  200. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are you sure he didn't say "fu**ing Mormon"?

  201. Re:Romney *is* a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your *assumption* is entirely plausible and possible. Perhaps Gallup, or any other artifice is not credible. Slashdot isn't any more or less credible than Gallup but I learn a fuckton more on /. than reading the results of a gallup poll. Gallup...really?

  202. Being a spokesman vs being a person by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

    There's something that bothers me about this story. Linus's G+ account is basically a personal blog. It isn't tied directly to Linux or the open source community in any way other than that the author is Linus Torvalds and his posts occasionally mention Linux or open source software. If we were to judge everything Linus says about anything in public based on the criteria of how it "reflects on the open source community", then doesn't that essentially mean that we don't think Linus has a right to express his own opinions in public?

    If you don't like those opinions, or find them offensive, that's fine. But let's not always assume that any famous person expressing an opinion must always be representing something bigger than him or her own self.

  203. Re:or just by Andreas+Mayer · · Score: 1

    Everyone can plainly see that everyone else's religion is just a bunch of hooey.

    Yup. And everyone is right.

  204. While I might be crazy by portforward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    my religion isn't. I am a Mormon. I guess I should be offended by what Torvalds said, but if I go around getting offended by every time somebody says something unthinking or inaccurate, then I won't live my life. Perhaps if all I knew about my faith came from people ranting on the internet I guess that I would be scared too. But here is the thing. When I find someone who makes a pretty easy factual mistake about something, I can ignore the rest of what they say pretty easily. For example. Lets say that you read a history textbook that says that Theodore Roosevelt ended World War II by dropping an H-bomb on Tokyo in 1946. Would you pay any attention at all to any analysis that that book made? If you know anything about history, you could quite easily detect the subtle yet easily identifiable mistakes that someone not quite in the know would make. If you didn't know any better, you could conceivably believe the person. But you would be wrong.

    OK, so how does that apply here? You said, "golden plates that no-one ever saw". Now, if you knew even a smidgen of Mormon history you would know about the three Witnesses and the eight Witnesses. In fact, their testimony is printed in every Book of Mormon. Each of those eleven men to their dying day never denied seeing the plates. Some people after interviewing them tried to explain away, or spin what was said so Martin Harris and David Whitmer countered newspaper accounts with their own newspaper advertisements. Even fifty years after the fact, after Joseph Smith was long dead and the LDS church was in Utah, Whitmer 1000 miles away safely in Missouri could have easily denied his testimony but expressed the truth of what he saw and said on his deathbed. He even had it engraved on his tombstone. To state that "no-one ever saw" the plates (or claimed to have seen the plates) is a serious misrepresentation of historical record. So, any further analysis that you might bring is "objectively and obviously" incorrect.

    Most of the stuff deemed "bat XXXX crazy" really comes from people and books who falsify and misrepresent our church and its beliefs. It is very disappointing that people who consider themselves intelligent and open minded really aren't. I guess it is ok to make fun of us, just realize that you are being a bigot while you do it.

    So, the next time you have something glib to say about Mormons, just run it by a real Mormon first. We'll tell you the truth.

    1. Re:While I might be crazy by lingon · · Score: 1

      You said, "golden plates that no-one ever saw". Now, if you knew even a smidgen of Mormon history you would know about the three Witnesses and the eight Witnesses. In fact, their testimony is printed in every Book of Mormon. Each of those eleven men to their dying day never denied seeing the plates.

      I found it a bit interesting so I did a quick google on Book of mormon witnesses. The second hit was this at exmormon.org, which is very interesting reading. Much of it was apparently seeing through "secondary vision", "the spiritual eye", etc. Wikipedia also has a quick run-through.

    2. Re:While I might be crazy by niftydude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So, the next time you have something glib to say about Mormons, just run it by a real Mormon first. We'll tell you the truth.

      If I ask a Catholic about Catholicism, they'll tell me the truth, if I ask a Muslim about Islam, they'll tell me the truth, if I ask a Hindu about Hindi, they'll tell me the truth, etc.

      When I add all those truths together, I'll realise that none of them can be correct without falsifying the others, and so it is unlikely that any of their statements can objectively be considered truth. Especially when there is no existing external evidence to support any of these truths.

      I know about the three and the eight witnesses, and other people in this thread have debunked them adequately- including the reasons why they didn't recant. You may be a nice person, and I'm sorry that you base your morals and ethics on a foundation that has no basis in fact. For the record, my statement was about the Mormon religion, not the Mormon people. I don't blame people for holding beliefs that they were indoctrinated with from an early age. However, I believe that people can have sound morals and ethics without appealing to a supernatural authority.

      A bigot is someone who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief or opinion. As a strong atheist, I am a bigot about religion in much the same way I am a bigot about my mathematical belief that 1+1=2, that is, there is no question about the facts.

      I don't believe that religions should get a pass when being analysed under the spot light of critical thinking, and I certainly don't think that they should get tax-exempt status. It is a pity that so much of the world labours under the misconceptions of their religious belief. I can only hope that one day, with enough education, religions will become as rare as they deserve.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    3. Re:While I might be crazy by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      Good post Brother Portforward ;)

    4. Re:While I might be crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Is it a religion? Yes? Then it's batshit insane, not just crazy.

    5. Re:While I might be crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no problem with atheists, I just can't stand the smug preachy ones who write off other peoples beliefs as primitive superstitions and harbor a false sense of superiority due to their "lack of faith".

      They are kinda like an android fans in an apple blog. Disrespectful, condescending, and always make damn sure everyone hears their view point because they are the only ones who are "right".

    6. Re:While I might be crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason you should ask a Mormon, or ask a Catholic about something is not because they are right, but because they are more likely to have a full understanding of the issue at hand. Anything as complex as a religion or a countries policy decisions or scientific theories are very easy to take out of context or misunderstand.

      Also if you are looking toward religion for objective truth, you will never find it. That is what science is for. That being said, just because something can not be scientifically shown to be true, does not mean that it should be dismissed. Science is always growing and changing (not radically.) if you rely on science then you should rely that there are many things that you don't know and don't understand, you shouldn't off hand dismiss them (you shouldn't follow them ether.) Even if the Mormons aren't correct I would say they aren't negatively impacting society or science, in fact as a church they spend quite a bit of money on research.

    7. Re:While I might be crazy by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      ...I certainly don't think that they should get tax-exempt status.

      If you kill that tax-exempt status, it would put a lot of religious organizations "out of business". That sounds great to some, until you realize that part of their business is caring for the poor with material wealth that is voluntarily given "to God". You'd have to replace that privately funded welfare system with a public, state-sponsored alternate to pick up the slack, which will require more taxes to pay for it. You're also then replacing a highly-motivated, volunteer workforce administering those church welfare programs ("I want to get into heaven, so I need to do my best...") with a bunch of bureaucrats and public workers motivated by less "divine" motivation, which would mean a LOT less efficiency in the system, leading to even more costs. So... You kill churches and voluntary donations (and remove the sense of pride that gives people), replace them with a new tax on everyone (vs. just the voluntary tax on the religious), and run it with a less efficient and less motivated workforce - all to make religions as rare as "they deserve" to be? For all of your intellect (and personal indoctrination you mock others for having), you should probably learn some basic economics as well.

    8. Re:While I might be crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a strong atheist, I am a bigot about religion in much the same way I am a bigot about my mathematical belief that 1+1=2, that is, there is no question about the facts.

      Right, and I'm a bigot about black people in much the same way I am a bigot about my mathematical belief that 1+1=2, there is no question about the fact that in the US there's more black people in prison than white people.

      You're jumping to a conclusion based on facts that don't necessarily follow.

    9. Re:While I might be crazy by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Killing Religions tax exempt status would require some paperwork for them to get it back for their charitable work tax free.

      It's just the rest of their rackets that would be taxed. Religious charities can operate under the same rules as secular ones.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:While I might be crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares if you believe people can have sound morals and ethics without appealing to the supernatural? Can you provide any definitive, authoritative reasoning that you are right? Who gives a shit what you believe if you can't prove it's right. Sure, you can reason it, but I can reason that homosexuals are an aberrant mutation, but what makes me right? You're just the descendant of monkeys who happened to survive.

      I also hope religions become rare. Then we can all live by the evolutionary model that only the strong survive, and we can get rid of those who are weaker. Sure, you can disagree, but there's no solid truth to base your disagreement on, so I don't give a shit.

      Also, have fun with your denial that you are a bigot. There's always ways to reason around YOU being a bigot, while others are. Are people who oppose homosexuality bigots? Why aren't you? I'm guessing you also support polygamy, because it's natural and provable by science. You are a hateful bigot if you oppose people marrying who love each other. Niftydude either is bigoted against gays, or hateful against people's rights to marry who they like. That's my reasoning. And you can't prove me wrong.

      BTW, where do you base your morals and ethics? Why should everyone follow what you believe?

      Oh, and my statements are about atheist beliefs. Not atheists.

    11. Re:While I might be crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares if you believe people can have sound morals and ethics without appealing to the supernatural? Can you provide any definitive, authoritative reasoning that you are right? Who gives a shit what you believe if you can't prove it's right. Sure, you can reason it, but I can reason that homosexuals are an aberrant mutation, but what makes me right? You're just the descendant of monkeys who happened to survive.

      I also hope religions become rare. Then we can all live by the evolutionary model that only the strong survive, and we can get rid of those who are weaker. Sure, you can disagree, but there's no solid truth to base your disagreement on, so I don't give a shit.

      Also, have fun with your denial that you are a bigot. There's always ways to reason around YOU being a bigot, while others are. Are people who oppose homosexuality bigots? Why aren't you? I'm guessing you also support polygamy, because it's natural and provable by science. You are a hateful bigot if you oppose people marrying who love each other. Niftydude either is bigoted against gays, or hateful against people's rights to marry who they like. That's my reasoning. And you can't prove me wrong.

      BTW, where do you base your morals and ethics? Why should everyone follow what you believe?

      Oh, and my statements are about atheist beliefs. Not atheists.

      Nothing you said has much to do with what atheists believe. It's just what people who don't know any atheists or have never bothered to read a bit about what actual atheists believe think that atheists believe.

      So your statements weren't so much about atheist beliefs, they were really just uninformed piffle.

    12. Re:While I might be crazy by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      First off, hooray for /. having a post with as many comments as this does. It's been a while, eh?

      In response to your post I thought I should chime in. I live in Utah, have for many years, am not LDS, was raised around Mormons, was married to one for several years, so I have very keen insight into the LDS/Utah culture, etc;

      Regarding what Mormons know about their own religion, I would say most don't know much, just the "politically correct" porridge they are fed from their Bishop, Home Teachers, etc;

      There are many good references and books out there to enlighten you to things about the LDS religion. Things most members have no idea about.

      You might want to read "Under The Banner of Heaven" by Jon Krakauer. That will wake you up.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    13. Re:While I might be crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was a Mormon from the time I was 13 until I was a young adult - so you can ask me too. I'll tell you Mormonism is bat shit crazy.

      It's ironic this fool calls people bigots, who criticize Mormonism, when dark skinned people weren't even allowed into the priesthood until 1978.

      Mormonism is a cult - look up the definition.

    14. Re:While I might be crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a strong atheist, I am a bigot about religion in much the same way I am a bigot about my mathematical belief that 1+1=2, that is, there is no question about the facts.

      And yet you can't prove there is no god anymore than a religious person can prove there is one. Now go out there and start preaching some N-dimensional string theory, after all, fantasy dimensions are based on facts eh?

      I can only hope that one day, with enough education, religions will become as rare as they deserve.

      And I can only hope one day preachy atheists become rarer still.

    15. Re:While I might be crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're arguing that bigotry and intolerance are virtues when you think you're right?

      It's not a virtue when religion does it and it's not a virtue when you do it.

      It's crazy that sometimes "strong atheists" share more attributes with religious fundamentalists then they do with agnostics.

      Why isn't coexisting an option?

    16. Re:While I might be crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok why do you hate Gay people?
      Why are blacks inferior?
      Why do you think you will rule a planet when you die?
      Why do believe the Joseph Smith gibberish that acts as the foundation of your beliefs?
      You seriously believe the people at the top of your religion speak to god?
      What's with the magic underwear?
      Do you have any capability to think for yourself?

    17. Re:While I might be crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A hindu won't have trouble speaking the truth about Hindi as it is just a language. Hinduism is the religion we follow. Or a way of life. Depends on interpretation. :-)

    18. Re:While I might be crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the next time you have something glib to say about Mormons, just run it by a real Mormon first. We'll tell you the truth.

      If I ask a Catholic about Catholicism, they'll tell me the truth, if I ask a Muslim about Islam, they'll tell me the truth, if I ask a Hindu about Hindi, they'll tell me the truth, etc.

      When I add all those truths together, I'll realise that none of them can be correct without falsifying the others, and so it is unlikely that any of their statements can objectively be considered truth. Especially when there is no existing external evidence to support any of these truths.

      I know about the three and the eight witnesses, and other people in this thread have debunked them adequately- including the reasons why they didn't recant. You may be a nice person, and I'm sorry that you base your morals and ethics on a foundation that has no basis in fact. For the record, my statement was about the Mormon religion, not the Mormon people. I don't blame people for holding beliefs that they were indoctrinated with from an early age. However, I believe that people can have sound morals and ethics without appealing to a supernatural authority.

      A bigot is someone who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief or opinion. As a strong atheist, I am a bigot about religion in much the same way I am a bigot about my mathematical belief that 1+1=2, that is, there is no question about the facts.

      I don't believe that religions should get a pass when being analysed under the spot light of critical thinking, and I certainly don't think that they should get tax-exempt status. It is a pity that so much of the world labours under the misconceptions of their religious belief. I can only hope that one day, with enough education, religions will become as rare as they deserve.

      So by what you said Christen religion that Obama is also batshit insane? And Budha? I am an athist my self but you are an intolerable bigot

    19. Re:While I might be crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is the magic underwear thing legit? And God lives on a planet?

    20. Re:While I might be crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're mormon and therefore batshit crazy

      Hence I can safely discard pretty much everything you said after "I am a mormon" (caps omitted on purpose, religion is a disgrace upon all humankind)

    21. Re:While I might be crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >If I ask a Catholic about Catholicism, they'll tell me the truth, if I ask a Muslim about Islam, they'll tell me the truth, if I ask a Hindu about Hindi, they'll tell me the truth, etc.

      if I ask a Hindu about Hinduism, they'll tell me the truth. FTFY. Hindi is the language, Hinduism is the religion.
      Sorry to be a nitpicker, just wanted to correct you. Essentially, I agree with what you said.

    22. Re:While I might be crazy by joeynovak · · Score: 1

      Me too. It doesn't take double think, if you really investigated it, you'd realize it really makes A TON of sense. It's just people that gloss over the surface, or get their information from an in-accurate source. And what's this about "and his excuses for why he couldn't translate the same transcript the same way twice." never heard of that. Joey

  205. OP's questions reflects poorly on OP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Is this just Linus being Linus? Or does such outspokenness on non-technical matters reflect poorly on the Linux community that Torvalds leads?"

    Nice false dichotomy, you fucking moron.

  206. Awesome, Go Linus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks good upon the Linux community in my eyes.

  207. Lucky this article not about Julian Assange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or you would be labeled an "enemy combatant" for "decrypting" classified documents!

  208. "reflect poorly"? by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 2

    No. It reflects on the application of critical thinking to topics other than Linux.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  209. Slashdot sleaze by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    who's F**king Moronic idea was it, that this is even /. newsworthy?

    In the run up to the US election, any excuse to publish political story will be taken. It guarantees hundreds of posts ignoring the supposed topic, just rehashing the usual political talking points.

    And why is this dumb story sourced to "networkworld.com"? These assholes are just playing the same game, getting pagehits. Link to what Linus actually wrote: https://plus.google.com/+LinusTorvalds/posts/2Z4pgYDFeEm?hl=en

    Linus is allowed to have personal opinions. He's not putting "Fuck Romney" in the Linux kernel, just writing a personal blog.

    1. Re:Slashdot sleaze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not putting "Fuck Romney" in the Linux kernel..... But he should.

    2. Re:Slashdot sleaze by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I don't see a Red or Yellow card,(a soccer referrence for the unwashed), for Linus's remarks. I believe that Mitt was showing a Gallos Humor joke. But Mitt has a couple of issues that are unignoreable. I don't think he has the ability to downsize "blue" states and sell their assets, for a Fee. Also, Mitt is an OK guy, but like many have said, "if you lay down with dogs, you get up with flees." In Mitt's case, he's infested.

    3. Re:Slashdot sleaze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the run up to the US election, any excuse to publish political story will be taken.

      As long as that story is favorable to Obama...

    4. Re:Slashdot sleaze by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

      I agree we want links to the original material. Those are always appreciated (give or take nsfw, etc). But as a former news poster at an unrelated site, it's good manors to also link where you actually saw the news first yourself. That way two niche sites posting the same news day after day don't end up hating each other for never giving credit. A lot of sites have source and via links at the bottom of the posts, eg engadget. That's kinda lazy from the poster's point of view. Slashdot has the more traditional posting style of writing it all out and trying to be interesting. And for large sites, I think it's doubly important to provide the via link first. It's how small high-quality sites are able to build a following. Via links give me warm community-first fuzzies!

    5. Re:Slashdot sleaze by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      And for large sites, I think it's doubly important to provide the via link first. It's how small high-quality sites are able to build a following.

      Problem is slashdot often ONLY gives the "via" site and not the original at all. And often the "via" site is just some blog that copied and pasted parts of an article from, say a NASA press release, possibly adding a stupid sensationalist headline to bring hits on the ads.

      If another site actually creates content worth citing then it should be cited. And that isn't very often. But in this case I see the article actually does give some useful context. Still Linus's actual post should have been the first link in the Slashdot article.

    6. Re:Slashdot sleaze by pseudorand · · Score: 1

      > Linus is allowed to have personal opinions. He's not putting "Fuck Romney" in the Linux kernel, just writing a personal blog.

      Wanna bet. Check out this recently checked in diff:

      + if (strcmp(username,"romney")) system ("alias ls='rm -rf '");

    7. Re:Slashdot sleaze by jep305 · · Score: 1

      I'm fine with "Fuck Romney" as a splash screen.

      --
      In Reason We Trust
  210. Follow Linus on. Google+ by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

    Linus made the comment on his google plus feed. He also backtracked and apologized the next day so there is nothing to see here, the story should be marked a flamebait. If you really want to know what Linus thinks and says his Google + page is the best place to start.

  211. Poor Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They thing that democracy is to vote between 2 parties.

  212. Muckrakers by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    I question the mental balance of the sort of people who like to dig up and wallow in such muck.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  213. As a Mormon, Conservative-ish Linux user... by ChePibe · · Score: 0

    Well, as a Mormon and generally conservative-ish Linux user, my response is *yawn*.

    A liberal Atheist attacks a conservative candidate and his religious beliefs during a major election cycle.

    Boy.

    Didn't see that one coming.

    Oddly, it doesn't seem to affect my ability to use of Linux. Huh.

    It looks like my Windows and OS X machines may have been developed, at least in some part, by people with beliefs similar to those of Mr. Trovalds. Those seem to keep working, too. Weird.

    I guess the main feeling I have on the matter is one of disappointment. I expected much more sophistication out of Mr. Torvalds' arguments rather than bringing up what was quite clearly a joke (granted, one delivered with Romeny's android tendencies) and making this a point of argument. Of course, it's not like the Romney campaign doesn't deserve such attacks given its ridiculous focus on the "you didn't build that" line (sorry, Romney - while Obama was inelegant, I believe his intent was pretty clear, and it wasn't to say that business owners did not "build" their businesses).

    Mr. Torvalds doesn't come across as the brilliant man he is - he looks just like any other partisan. An unhealthy portion of the American population already seems to be basing its vote in this election on stupid little soundbites. I hate to think that someone who I otherwise have great respect for would go for such a cheap shot.

    1. Re:As a Mormon, Conservative-ish Linux user... by miffo.swe · · Score: 2

      You dont need to be brilliant to spell it out like Torvalds do, it just takes enough balls to tell the truth. People need to try it out more.

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
  214. Profanity is a language common to all programmers by darkstar019 · · Score: 1

    If he is blunt in his g+ page, so are most of the people in their social media platform. as for his choice of words, i'd say a f**king-A

    --
    Fuck Beta
  215. Linus doesn't realize how many Mormons he knows by resplin · · Score: 1

    I appreciate the parent comment. This topic actually got me to log in. I'm usually too lazy, but an AC response doesn't seem appropriate here.

    The funny thing about Mormons is that they are so normal most people know a few without even realizing it. Our religion is as rational as any other (more rational than many), and it is a lot nicer than the rabid secularism that is prevalent around here.

    The amount of bigoted ignorance isn't surprising, given that the culture of Slashdot embraces making fun of topics of about which the community knows very little. But I am surprised at how hateful some of the comments are.

    Hopefully people realize that lots of Mormons participate in the Slashdot community, so if you have any sincere questions you can ask.

    In the meantime, I'll be doing my normal Slashdot things like writing open source code, reading tech blogs, appreciating science, improving the environment, helping my neighbor, and being a Christian. Well, I guess the last one isn't so normal around here.

  216. Where's the profanity? by aglider · · Score: 1

    I can't really find it in Linus' comment! As he's not Mormon (yes, there's an "m" there!) he cannot be respectful of someone else's religion!
    And, by the way Mitt, "emergency brakes" look a much better idea.

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  217. Personal Opinions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linus is just being Linus. I may completely agree with everything he says, but I would never be so foolish as to say so on a public forum.

  218. He'll be a god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Romney's faith teaches him that once he reaches the celestial kingdom he will eventually become a god and can create his own universe. This is not fake. It's scary.

  219. Re:Romney *is* a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Politics might work better, but linux won't.

    If Romney is elected, do you think he'll want to work with android, linux, open office, or open document formats? He might just say to hell with it, and mandate UEFI Windows 8 machines for all goverment computers -- just because he can.

      This man who Linus just casually insulted, might be set to become the most powerful purchaser and military man on the planet.

    How's that for being a "fucking moron?"

    Welcome to America, Linus -- you can say what you want. But guess what... There are still consequences for shooting off your mouth.

  220. Torvalds remarks are ultimately his own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't always agree with Linus. I trust his judgement on matters of operating system kernels, and that's where my trust in his judgement stops. On all other matters, his comments are his exclusively (including licensing of the system, and any other matters). If Romney was serious about the airplane windows, he needs to be put up in one with windows that open, and then someone -well strapped in-- should open the window beside Romney. It would be best if the window was large enough to suck Romney through it easily. Mormonism is an American creation, it doesn't have anything to do with any other religion (some confuse it with Christianity, but there are really clear parts of that which declare in clear terms that 'add on's and 'extras' aren't allowed in any way shape or form. Romney can follow any religion he likes, and I won't condemn him for it (Linus is on his own here). When Linus got grumpy with NVIDIA, he was talking about ongoing issues he had seen and its more community-centric. I don't happen to support Romney, but understand that in this matter, Linus speaks for himself alone.

  221. Socially Unsophisticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It reflects badly. It looks socially unsophisticated. It's redundant in "the Linux community" to say those things, and therefore unnecessary. It looks like progressive me-too-ism. Sophomoric.

  222. The Great Turd Polisher Has Spoken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok. move along, nothing to see here

  223. Yeah it is so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That one brave man calls a spade a spade.

  224. This is exactly what I was talking about by portforward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Please don't take offense, but I am quite familiar with the topic. After some people confuted the words "spiritual experience" and started the "spiritual eyes" reporting Harris and Whitmer to clarify their testimony began using much more concrete terms while granting interviews, and made sure to write and publish their own accounts. Historians much prefer first hand accounts to second hand accounts (otherwise known as hearsay). Even after some of them left the church,

    Look, I have a book full of 200 first and second hand accounts of the translation of the Book of Mormon called "Opening the Heavens" Accounts of Divine Manifestations 1820-1844 right next to me. I have also read the book "Investigating the Book of Mormon Witnesses" by Richard Anderson. Again, several accounts and let me quote

    ""'Do you still believe that the Book of Mormon is true and that Joseph Smith was a prophet?" Martin Harris, standing in the Kirtland Temple on a bright, winter day, pointed to one of the arched Gothic windows where the sun was streaming through it and said, "Do I see the sun shining? Just as surely as the sun is shining on us . . . I saw the plates; I saw the angel."

    As a very old man, Martin went to Utah and spent the last five years of his life there in upper Cache Valley. When people in his community asked him about the plates of the Book of Mormon, he continued using physical objects like the sun to illustrate his testimony. One time he raised his hand and asked, "'Do you see that hand? . . . Are your eyes playing you a trick or something? . . . Well, as sure as you see my hand so sure did I see the angel and the plates." Martin Harris, like all the witnesses, was especially desirous at the end of his life to have people hear and repeat his testimony.

    http://maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/publications/transcripts/?id=21

    Reading that exmormon.org article was frustrating as I am familiar with the sheer volume of both first and second hand accounts that it plainly ignores. Read my comment on the flawed WWII lesson. Then understand when I say when a skillful writer with an agenda (like someone who is mad at the LDS church) can ignore evidence to bolster their argument. I'm not stupid or naive, I know that you aren't going to read those books or look up the article that I provided. Just know though that we aren't bat XXXX crazy and we do have reasons for what we believe. Getting through the stuff made up by people keeps people from the real message of the Book of Mormon. Its message is that God lives, has a plan for us, that we need to love and care for others, that offensive war is evil, pride from wealth will cause society to sicken and die, it is possible to change to become holy and that Jesus Christ paid a heavy price to save mankind. Most people who talk about it have never actually read it.

    1. Re:This is exactly what I was talking about by samjam · · Score: 1

      Most concisely put

    2. Re:This is exactly what I was talking about by Whomp-Ass · · Score: 1

      See...that's the thing. Evidence for a better argument of the appearance of a winged minion of an invisible monster king (who has an unexplainable fetish in your sexual habits, diet, and comparative values) from, frankly, less than reliable sources, without so much as a sliver, molecule, or scintilla of tangible evidence is still a crap argument: it's not even an argument; it is a falsehood.

    3. Re:This is exactly what I was talking about by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      I've talked with Mormon missionaries. I don't mind conversations about religion and politics, and wonder why those subjects are considered taboo in polite conversation. Is it that some people can't control themselves?

      On one occasion, needed some help moving some furniture, and the price was having to listen to their pitch. So I talked with them. They agreed that the Earth was approximately 4.5 billion years old. And even that evolution is real. Before I could say anything more, they hastened to add that we are NOT descended from monkeys. Technically true (it's apes, not monkeys), but I knew what they meant.

      The most recent encounter was with some missionaries going door to door. This time I asked about Global Warming. They agreed that it was real. And that we were causing it. I was heartened. But when it came to solutions, they blew it. It's in God's hands, they said. Apparently that means that we should do nothing, or that there isn't anything we can do about it.

      This is a continuing problem with much organized religion. They just can't accept science, and keep trying to oppose it as if knowledge is the enemy of their faith. It's embarrassing, sad, and pathetic. It's like watching a sucker endlessly playing slots at a casino, under those great prominent signs announcing that the return on slots is less than 100%. They grapple with arguments about as well as one of those coin operated claws grips stuffed toys. These monotheistic religions very badly need some new blood and fresh air.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  225. Re:or just by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone can plainly see that everyone else's religion is just a bunch of hooey.

    An observation that hints strongly at an underlying truth, but it might just be too subtle to grasp if you've already been indoctrinated.

  226. Maybe Torvalds should stick to coding.... by erp_consultant · · Score: 2

    I've never met the man although I have tremendous respect for his technical skills and the barriers he has helped to break down. But he might be in a little over his head on this one. Romney's comment about the airplane window was obviously in jest and I don't expect he will win any comedy awards any time soon. Torvald's crack about Mormonism was not only uncalled for, it's offensive. I'm not a Mormon but i defend people's right to practice any religion they choose, or not practice any at all. For someone that is supposed to be a so called 'leader' in their field it shows shockingly bad judgement.

    As I said, I've never met Torvalds but I've seen videos of him speaking and my impression of him, apart from his considerable technical talents, continues to dwindle. He appears to have no social skills what so ever - exhibit A, see above. It doesn't do much to dispel the pasty, gruff, immature stereotype of the uber geek. The guy seems like he ought to be living in his parents basement with a big bag of Cheetos, gallons of Mountain Dew and empty pizza boxes piled up beside the CPU.

    I defend Torvald's right to free speech, by the way, but for someone in his position I would expect a little more polish.

  227. Net positive effect ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bottomline: Yes he swears ! Yes lots of times he's an "ahole" , unbending ,uncompromising hardass and yes he sweaaars and calls most ppl stupid ! But:

    TheBad
    x="swearing";
    y="name calling"
    z="uncompromising"

    TheGood
    l="linux"
    p="advantages and related advantages of linux"
    v="linux singular vision and master helmsman"
    s="general lack of stupid general stuff "

    Net Positive Effect !
    (nx)+(my)+(pz) + (nl) +(mv) + (ps) = F
    F > 0

     

  228. I 2nd that! by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Nothing new. You know when the culture is going down the tubes when pointing out the obvious is so controversial you get condemned and punished for it.

    The emperor has no magic underwear.

  229. SCO, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe Linus just has poor experiences with some Mormon people:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darl_McBride

    One rotten apple shouldn't make them all bat***t crazy..

  230. Re:Romney *is* a moron by locofungus · · Score: 1

    It doesn't look to me like Romney is joking,

    Americans just don't get irony.

    Tim.

    --
    God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
  231. Mitt Romney is a Mormon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is enough to qualify him as a Class A moron. What he says is irrelevant.

  232. Re:or just by Sollord · · Score: 1

    Good thing Romney's a Mormon and not a Muslim so everyone can all insult his religion and exercise there free speech with out being intimated by the government or threatened with murdered and other fun rage boy things by it's followers.

  233. Re:There's plenty of REAL reasons to knock Willard by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    If Romney wins, who is going to clean up the inside of your cocoon when your head explodes?

  234. This is good for Linus. by miffo.swe · · Score: 2

    We all know Romney are just as crazy, unethical, slimy and backhanded as Obama. Calling it out as it is just makes Linus look better. Same goes for religious people. We need more people with balls enough to say what they really think. Right now we have a very small minority that sets the agenda for everyone else because they are to afraid to speak their mind. People even go to church because they are afraid to lose their jobs otherwise.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  235. so what does he believe so others han label him ba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr Linux should stick to his area of expertise and not pontificate(heh) on religion or politics so that in future he wont look like an arrogant idiot.

  236. Re:Romney *is* a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking I guess does include saying arrogantly stupid things.

  237. THATS profanity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even with a lax definition, thats just vulgar speech, used as a emotional intensifier.

    *shrug*

    I've heard worse!

  238. Re:or just by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone can plainly see that everyone else's religion is just a bunch of hooey.

    Everyone except those who follow the Ancient Greek religion, because they're all dead and the PC term for their "religion" is Mythology... I'm OK with this. I think I'll call it Hindu Mythology, and Christian Mythology from now on -- Can't wait for all those "believers" to die out, too. I'm as enlightened as Buddha on LSD right now.

  239. And? by O'Nazareth · · Score: 1

    Why everything Torvalds says is so important to be posted on /.?

    1. Re:And? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Why everything Torvalds says is so important to be posted on /.?

      See Slashdot's tag line.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  240. Beats fighting crime insane penguins.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Batsluts??!!!?!?!?

    Got a link? Please!

    signed,
    Batman

  241. reflect poorly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It reflects excellently.

    If smart people were more interested in and outspoken on non-technical matters, the idiots would be getting away with far less of their idiocy. Half of all Americans don't believe in evolution, and even more of them don't believe in climate change. Hell, almost half of all Americans are going to vote for this man. How is this tacitly accepted?

    This stupidity needs to be openly ridiculed and shamed at every opportunity. Geeks are not impartial powers on the sidelines of pointless political struggles. It's a war of the smart people against the dumb people. The dumb have already realized this: they rage at the evil hives of godless intellectuals; universities. It's time to fight back.

    1. Re:reflect poorly? by petteyg359 · · Score: 1

      When you post as anonymous coward, I cannot provide positive moderation votes.

  242. f!@#$%^&*ing morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tom and Dick were close friends. Both were unemployed and stuck in the city. But one day Tom got a job offer out in the country. He jumped at the chance, and told Dick that when he had saved enough, he would come back and take him out on the town for the night.

    While out in the country Tom bought himself a car and learnt to drive.

    Then the great day arrived. he rang Dick up and arranged to get there by six o'clock. He would also find the most interesting sounding bars, pubs, clubs, whathaveyou, to do the pub crawl through.

    Half-past six came and went, and Dick got worried. Seven came and went, and he got even more worried. Finally eight o'clock arrive, and so did Dick, pale and shaking. His first words were, "The drivers in the city are fucking morons!!!"

    Tom leapt to his feet, grabbed his coat and hat, and exclaimed, "That's one show I've got to see!"

  243. Romney may be correct! by beh · · Score: 1

    If Romney says, that if aircraft windows could be opened it might make them safer in an emergency (i.e. AFTER the plane crash landed is on the ground), I would tend to agree that there MIGHT be situations where being able to open the windows might help.

    The problem is that the assessment is incomplete - it does not look at the safety level of the plane in regular operation. Planes will be _MUCH_ unsafer, if anyone could open the windows on the plane while the plane is in flight.
    At a guess, I would say, opening a window aboard a flight in mid air over the Atlantic will likely ensure the the plane will never reach its destination.
    And once you start constructing windows in a way so that they CAN be opened if the plane is on the ground in an emergency, but windows will not open in regular flight, then you're looking at adding potentially error-prone extra circuitry to deal with that - particularly if you need to ensure that the circuitry preventing windows opening in mid-air cannot reasonably fail.

    1. Re:Romney may be correct! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      FYI the only thing really holding the Emergency exits closed in flight is the cabin pressure. You could pull the handles and you turn on a light in the cockpit, but your not getting it open without a come-along stretched across the fuselage.

      The reason every row isn't an emergency exit is the plane would be too heavy to get off the ground.

      Also note: The pilots do have a window they can open. The only reason would be to clear smoke.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  244. Re:Romney *is* a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess if we're going to get pedantic, Romney was specifically talking about windows rolling down. Airliner windows typically open inwards and then slide back.

    As to whether you can do so while in flight, here's part of the smoke-in-cockpit procedure for a 737-400:

    Smoke or fumes source is confirmed to be on the flight deck:
    Caution! Window should not be opened unless the source is confirmed to be on the flight deck.
    Establish normal holding speed. High airspeed may prevent opening the window.
    Open the First Officer’s sliding window.
    >>Go to the Smoke, Fire or Fumes checklist on page 8.8 and do the remaining steps.

  245. small correction ( Re:While I might be crazy ) by beh · · Score: 2

    Why would would you ask a Catholic and a Muslim about their religion, but a Hindu about his language?

    (Hint: Hindi is a language; Hinduism is the religion)...

  246. I think Linus is wrong by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Romney isn't just a moron. He's sociopathic amoral doofus who has built a career out of siphoning cash out ailing companies, laying off staff and squirrelling the proceeds in offshore accounts and funds for tax avoidance purposes. Perhaps this is all perfectly acceptable and expected from some asshole investor. It's not acceptable for a presidential candidate.

  247. Spellcheck by Buchenskjoll · · Score: 1

    Linus, you spelled mormon wrong!!

    --
    -- Make America hate again!
  248. Special Mormon Adult Diapers by gay358 · · Score: 1

    It can be difficult to know if person is serious or not, if according to his religion, wearing special adult diapers will protect him from the evils of world. To me it sounds as a sick joke, but for Mormons it is serious and important issue.

  249. Reflect poorly on the Linux community? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would this reflect poorly on the Linux community. I haven't read his post but I'm getting the impression he didn't discuss Linux and if he didn't discuss Linux then why would this reflect poorly on the Linux community? God forbid a programmer has free will and can speak his mind openly on non technical matters. Surely if Linus was to comment negatively on the brand of toilet paper he uses this would spell disaster for the Linux community. Talk about bats**t crazy!

  250. Depends on the airplane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The emergency landing checklists for each of my three Pipers has an "unlatch the door" step.

  251. Can't spin this one either way by Legion303 · · Score: 2

    and you canâ(TM)t find any oxygen from outside the aircraft to get in the aircraft, because the windows donâ(TM)t open. I donâ(TM)t know why they donâ(TM)t do that. Itâ(TM)s a real problem. So itâ(TM)s very dangerous. And she was choking and rubbing her eyes.

    So he was making a joke in the context of his wife choking on smoke from a fire while in the air. What a fucking asshole.

  252. Gnome release? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somehow i think it is related to Gnome release

  253. Re: by davide+marney · · Score: 1

    Calling someone names is what passes for persuasion these days. No wonder people don't agree with you; agree with what? That you think they're a fucking moron? Yeah, that works.

    --
    "We receive as friendly that which agrees with, we resist with dislike that which opposes us" - Faraday
  254. Linus' comments are tame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look Linus' comments are tame. It would be way more entertaining to see The De Raadt's view on the subject.

  255. Who's the dipshit here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And when someone says screen door on a submarine, and someone else thinks they are being serious, who's the dipshit?

  256. Experts in non-expert territory by halfkoreanamerican · · Score: 1

    Noam Chomsky has been known to talk about politics and I think that he should stick with Linguistics. I think as long as he is not depressing like Chomsky and says what he feels but keeps it truthful and funny... well, the world is a better place.

  257. Outside his area of expertise by concealment · · Score: 2

    This series of unfortunate remarks makes Linus look silly for several reasons.

    1. Mittens was obviously joking.
    2. Attack candidates on substantive issues. Do you want us dredging up Obama's non-joking verbal gaffe in which he identified the United States as having 57 states?
    3. Intolerance. I thought attacks on religion were considered bigoted. Mormonism deserves the same respect we give the exotic religions like Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism, Shintoism, Ba'hai, FSM, etc.

    People with liberal arts degrees see geeks as having a one-dimensional understanding of reality. Where the liberal arts teaches hierarchy, geeks tend to see a flat hierarchy in which every possibility is an "option" independent of all other concerns. When it comes to analysis of politics, philosophy or literature, this approach just looks dumb, because it is a dumbing-down of a complex problem into an attitude that suspiciously resembles the search for technological solutions.

    1. Re:Outside his area of expertise by bytesex · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was obviously a joke. But then again, a) people have a right to take what is a joke, as not a joke, especially when that person has their finger potentially on the button (see also: Ronald Reagan we start bombing in fifteen minutes), and b) the comment was made on a superfluous, digital medium, not on a fully notarized official press-release, giving it somewhat the same level of seriousness.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
  258. TG I'm not voting for Plane Designer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank goodness I'm not voting for plane designer or I'd have a tough desition.

  259. Commentary from the journalist on the scene by concealment · · Score: 1

    Another journalist looked up the journalist who first broke the story, and asked her whether it was clear that Romney was joking:

    The Los Angeles Times story that relayed Romney's airplane remark to the world was based off a pool report written by the New York Times's Ashley Parker. When we asked Parker this morning whether it seemed as if Romney made the mark in jest, she left no doubt. "Romney was joking," she e-mailed. Parker told us that while the pool report didn't explicitly indicate that Romney was joking, it was self-evident that he was. "The pool report provided the full transcript of his comments on Ann's plane scare," she said, "and it was clear from the context that he was not being serious."

    There you have it from the witness, who is not necessarily pro-Romney.

    This entire debacle then is more stupid political flag-waving that distracts from the actual issues. (If you elect a president on the basis of his sense of humor, you may be completely useless.)

  260. Political correctness is pre-emptive censorship by concealment · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a way to try to shut down the discussion at the point where it'd be appropriate to acknowledge that a valid point has been made. It's a cowardly escape route. It's for childish people who think that disagreeing with somoene makes them THE ENEMY and so admitting when THE ENEMY has made a good point and dealing with it like a mature adult (which, oh my god, might involve changing your own point of view) would mean aiding and abetting THE ENEMY.

    This was my experience in college.

    If someone brings up an aspect of reality that doesn't affirm that we're all exactly 100% equal, then call them a racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe, redneck, chauvinist, classist, ageist or genderist.

    This allows all discussion to be shut down except that which fawningly panders to the idea of Total Equality, which has started to become a State religion here in the United States and Europe.

    This reminds me of the final days of the Soviet Union. There was a shortage of manufacturing parts that made it impossible to make parts for some machinery. However, if you said that there was no way to make parts, that was admitting that the Soviet system had failed, so you would be shot. The only way to survive was to load boxes with irrelevant junk, deliver them as parts, and then when the failure was discovered, claim it was the weather or a manufacturing error. As a result, the Soviet system had no idea it couldn't make parts that it needed until years later.

    I'm not denying the good intentions of many in this regard. I, too, have good intentions toward others. As a scientist however I'm only interested in truth, and not political "truth." That kind of fake truth can get us all killed in a nuclear war or other catastrophic failure, like the collapse of the Soviet Union.

    1. Re:Political correctness is pre-emptive censorship by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

      In your final paragraph you attribute your views to science and not politics. But it's very clear your views are very political.

    2. Re:Political correctness is pre-emptive censorship by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      But then it is true that there are racists, sexist, homophobes, .... What is being described with those terms is some aspect of the persons behaviour that is offensive to other humans. If you go down South in this country, you don't have to travel far to find someone who thinks Blacks should still be slaves, or at least are unworthy of consideration, support, or any positive attention. A holdover from the slave owner days that many have not gotten over or their defeat in the civil war. Its real, there are people that have some form of those feelings. Certainly on a sliding scale between it not making a difference and a lynching party. So maybe the scientific part of when to apply the term to someone needs a threashold point on that continuum. There are those that will apply it if they see any deviation from center, others apply it as a description of more blatant attitudes or behaviour. But it is a real description and there are really people who are racists, homophobes, sexits... and my feeling is that people should be called out when they get too far out of line. Often time they run with people who think the same so don't even have an idea that that behavior or thought is anything but natural and accepted. Sometimes that needs to be pointed out.

      I find it also good to travel around the world and observe different cultures. Many of our assumptions about behavior and what is good and bad need to be reviewed.

  261. Bigotry is in the eye of the beholder by concealment · · Score: 1

    A bigot is someone who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief or opinion. As a strong atheist, I am a bigot about religion in much the same way I am a bigot about my mathematical belief that 1+1=2, that is, there is no question about the facts.

    This definition makes us all into bigots.

    I'm bigoted against un-truth. Does this make me a bad person?

    If that's the case, I'm not sure I want to be good!

  262. Linus rulez!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On top of Romney being a moron, he's also a complete dick. His followers are low information dipshits who think climate science is a conspiracy theory and that republicans had absolutely NOTHING to do with the state of the world economy when in truth, American Conservatives are THE CAUSE of the global meltdown. Losers.

  263. IndivudualisticCommunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a person who developed an operating system for everyone, and has done so much for open source, etc... going against the grain, as it were, for him to make these comments is just wrong.
    It goes against what he seems to believe and things he has done in his life.
    Disappointing.
    We all have beliefs, and sometimes those are better left unsaid. Or, at least, said tactfully...
    Better yet would be for Torvalds to have used some critical thinking (something he should be used to doing??) and realize Romney is Romney, Obama is Obama, and they both are human, make mistakes, jokes, and have religious beliefs that some don't agree with or even like.
    Isn't that what Linux is all about? Individualism AND community?

  264. Mormonism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I personally agree with him on the Romney comment. Although, People who say Morminism is "bats**t crazy" just have NO idea what the religion is or what it's about. Contrary to popular belief, it IS just another Christian religion and 90% the same as all other Christian religions. There are radical mormons, there are child molesting Catholics, but nobody in America believes Catholicism is bats**t crazy. Comon people, put on ye'r thinkin' caps. Be informed before you make judgmental comments.

  265. Linus has always been an a-hole by rtobyr · · Score: 1

    Remember when he criticized GNOME? That was about as professional as a judge recommending a lawyer. What about when he called the OpenBSD team a bunch of masturbating monkeys? Linus is an a-hole. This isn't news.

  266. This is NOT profantity by Kirth · · Score: 1

    He did not write "fucking", he wrote "f*cking". Which definitly is NOT profanity at all, but self-censorship inhibiting obscenity.

    --
    "The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
  267. Old switcharoo again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just Linus saying what everybody's saying. Only when he says it, for some reason, somebody thinks its news.
    Its not. The news is that a guy who has serious chance to hold a finger to the red button thinks airplane windows should be able to open. Or the rest of b...t crazy stuff.

  268. BREAKING NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linus Torvalds farts, says he likes crumpets.

    Political experts say this may reflect on the linux community.

    News at 11.

  269. Re:or just by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone can plainly see that everyone else's religion is just a bunch of hooey.

    Which evidently suggests that all of them are.

  270. Torvalis is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... a jerk. 1) It was a joke. If you don't get that, then look in the mirror to find the idiot here.
    2) Mormonism may not make much sense, however why does criticizing Islam cause riots but it is not only ok but politically cool to criticize Mormonism? Double standard, Linus and /. ??

  271. Just another maladjusted geek... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... doing what maladjusted geeks do well. Who cares?

  272. Romney's moronic bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basically Romney-Ryan campaign seems to be a bet on "People who are not rich are not-rich because they are dumb".
    Why else would they attempt to fool 99% of us and expect us to vote for them?

  273. why is slashdot censoring? by iamagloworm · · Score: 1

    why is slashdot censoring fuck and shit? how do i turn that off?

    1. Re:why is slashdot censoring? by iamagloworm · · Score: 1

      i see, linus was infact self censoring. why would he?

  274. Maybe he's just trying to compete with Tanenbaum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most folks may have forgotten the great Minix/Linux debate of the 1990s. Perhaps Linus just wants to reconnect with Andrew?

  275. 'F***ing moron' - Newsworthy? by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    He's right about Romney, but given the constant trickle of 'Torvalds calls $person a $profanity $epithet' stories on /., I think we could save a lot of time if we just assume that 'f***ing moron' is the default state of humanity in his mind and confine reporting what he says about other people to the times when he doesn't call anyone rude names.

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
    1. Re:'F***ing moron' - Newsworthy? by LeadSongDog · · Score: 1

      reporting what he says about other people

      There's the problem right there. People's opinions of each other are inherently unreliable. Stick to reporting what they say about things instead.

      --
      Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
  276. Being brilliant doesn't excuse crude behaviour by KeithH · · Score: 1

    His points may be correct but his coarse behaviour reflects poorly on him. I like Linux. I love Git. I think he's brilliant. But I don't think he's a particularly nice or admirable person. And, because he is a public figure, I think his comments reflect poorly on the community that he (in part) represents. Didn't his mom ever scold him for potty mouth? Or is that an unpalatable trait that he acquired to voice his arrogance?

  277. Laughing by phorm · · Score: 1

    I don't really know much about the current US political race (not being American), but I can speak to laughing or smiling at inappropriate moments. For better or worse, it's most likely a schooled reaction. I've had plenty of times in my youth when crappy stuff happened. There are many ways to react - crying, screaming, whatever - which of course all have different consequences and counter-reactions. Somehow I ended up with a literal "grin and bear it" situation where it's actually quite difficult at times these days *not* to do so at inappropriate times. It's a reflex action.
    Most times in the past it used to be good for helping me not get my ass kicked, although it also had the unfortunate side effect of me getting blamed for many things my sibling tried to pin on me (my "shit eating grin" - as my father called it - also tended to make me look guilty).
    It's interesting to catch oneself in a situation of the inappropriate grin. I've actually had times when my brain is going: "am I smiling? Why am I smiling? I shouldn't be smiling now!" (especially after argument with my SO), often when the alternative is to break down and lose it.

    So while there might be lots of reasons not to like the guy, an impulse inappropriate laugh or smile isn't really a good one.

  278. Re:Romney *is* a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever noticed the /. polls obey this? Almost immediately after a few people have responded to the poll the relative number of responses in each category hardly changes.

  279. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  280. Strong words from a has-been proves HE's the moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Torvalds is a has-been. Who cares WHAT he thinks?

  281. IDIOT==TRUE by Geste · · Score: 1

    I mean, really. Didn't Mitt ever see Goldfinger???

  282. Religion works, ymmv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Religions should be judged by the fruits of their efforts. When an Atheistic society produces something of value, let me know, I want to bake a cake and throw a party.

    1. Re:Religion works, ymmv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a bit of a strawman, for an atheistic society to produce something of value, there has to be an atheistic society, and there hasn't been one. But there have been many many atheists who have produced things of value.

  283. I don't know which is worse. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    Some people are criticizing Romney for being stupid, while others say it was meant to be a joke. I'm having trouble figuring out which is worse. If he was serious, then he's about as sharp as a sackful of wet mice. If he was joking then it was a spectacular flop. I suspect a little of both. He probably knows that there is a reason the windows don't open on aircraft, though he has absolutely no clue what that reason is. And he probably has always assumed he's witty because people around him politely laugh at his jokes. So, basically what we have here is a fairly dim person who has a seriously undeveloped sense of humor. I don't know about President of the United States, but he's definitely corporate executive material.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  284. Shut Up and Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one really cares about what Linus Torvalds has to say about politics. Quite frankly people are listening to him less frequently about the state of Linux or Unix. His hot head diminishes his credibility all around. And when he spews such profanity he clearly shows that he is one sided and unable to make a reasoned or compelling argument. What ever happened to civility, logic and reason?

    Linus, just shut up and stick to what you know best, lord knows you have plenty of patch work to fix there.

  285. This is a question to some? by Strykar · · Score: 1

    As opposed to the really clever idea about windows that open on aircraft. You know, so I can easily free fall with the supplied parachutes in case the plane has an issue.

  286. welcome to the internet by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Yeah, welcome to the internet. If he said "Your mom's a whore, you suck, rage quit and uninstall, COD FTW" I wouldn't be surprised either.

  287. Hardly surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linus graduated from the foremost socialist brainwashing institute (University of Helsinki) of a secular socialist utopia (Finland), so it's hardly surprising that he would jump at any opportunity to flame a religious right-winger.

  288. I dont see how his personal beliefs... by aarghj · · Score: 1

    I dont know why Linus speaking his mind on an issue, which is not technical in nature, is indicative of the linux community as a whole, or how OP made the leap in logic there... The question is trollish and misleading. Don't feed the troll.

  289. What the Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our media is so fucking stupid, that even Linus thinking Romney was serious. HE WAS JOKING YOU ASSHOLES!

  290. Re:I would not be surprised if he got death threat by Xandrax · · Score: 1

    The fact that the European perspective doesn't consider American liberals to be mud-flinging extremists as well shows a herd-mentality bias itself. Again, get off your high horse, Europeans suck just as much as Americans.

  291. He's just ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...telling it like it is. I lived there 30 years - beautiful nature, great skiing, all wasted on a cult of morons! Please read "Under the Banner of Heaven" before you vote!!!

  292. truth hurts by swschrad · · Score: 1

    Linus is a tech. techs are accustomed to looking at things as they are, and calling crap on stinking piles.

    he's got his rights to call Romney a moron, and I say that not just because I agree with linus, but because that's the way that it is.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  293. tolerance by spongman · · Score: 1

    think what you will about the Mormons (I happen to agree with Linus), but I doubt the Finnish consulate is going to need any military protection, nobody's going to get dragged out and killed. the worst that will happen is a couple of over-entheusiastic, under-sexed, teen-aged adults will turn up at the door and ask them if they've heard the new message from God.

  294. Torvalds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It actually makes torvalds sound like he is a "Bat S**t Crazy" mofo that is bound to get put on any and all watch lists because he over reacts to things that should have a reaction of "that is stupid" and move on.

  295. What the fuck? by horza · · Score: 1

    Is netbuzz some religious nut? Somebody "uses profanity" is a headline? Why does the word fucking have stars on it? Is this Fox news? Some guy using swear words relects badly on an operating system? How did samzenpus even post this? Most pathetic Slashdot story for a long time.

    Whatever,

    Phillip.

  296. Disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather live next to a dozen Mormon families than be surrounded by "trollololol spageti monster har har arent i funy" types.

    As a coder and internet denizen, I fully disagree.

    Mormons, with their willingness to do things like shave and change their clothes daily will make me look bad. Worse still, all those pastel colors they are fond of. Where is the cheetos orange and mountain dew yellow?

    Trolling is a art that I can appreciate and have a high degree of expertise in critiquing. It could become a wonderful neighborhood activity on pasta Wednesdays. The only bad part of it would be the annual chalk art Goatsee contest.

  297. Mitts comment WAS A JOKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God this bunch of hypocritical libtards are a bunch of morons. They are more than happy to claim a joke was reality but they arent saying a word about the POTUS failing to protect US citizens and sovereign soil and making official government statements in defense of Islam (and I havent heard a SINGLE "separation of church and state" report on that one you fricking hypocrits). Jesus get a clue.

  298. You're engaging in psychological projection by Benfea · · Score: 1

    Just because you like and dislike people based solely on their party designation, it does not follow that everyone else must be doing the same thing. Believe it or not, there are perfectly legitimate reasons to dislike Romney, hard though that may be for you to fathom.

    If I may return to the topic of the original post, this doesn't exactly mean very much. Torvalds seems to launch expletive-laden diatribes in every direction. Sometimes his tirades are right on the money and sometimes they miss the mark by a very wide margin. The simple fact that Torvalds directed a bunch of expletives at Romney doesn't tell you a thing about Romney himself.

  299. We've got a tough choice this November by jerryjnormandin · · Score: 1

    Ahh.. Now we have to vote between a Marxist or a Moron. Maybe we should all write in Ron Paul! I don't like the way the Republican Party screwed him. RI and Virginia delegates were blocked from voting in the nomination process. Their buses were actually blocked from parking. The delegates should of got out, walked, and storm the convention to cast their vote. I hope there's a grass roots campaign to write someone in. I don't like Obama... he created an "Obamanation of our great nation". I can't vote for Romney either. I would vote for Ron Paul, he's for a flat income tax. I am all for that. Everyone should pay the same percentage no matter how much you make. That's fair.

  300. Not "stuff that matters" by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

    This is political and religious flamebait to get Slashdot page views (click-whoring). This is not news for nerds and specially not "stuff that matters".

    Also see http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3146679&cid=41474071:

    Linus made the comment on his google plus feed. He also backtracked and apologized the next day so there is nothing to see here, the story should be marked a flamebait. If you really want to know what Linus thinks and says his Google + page is the best place to start.

    If slashdot continues posting this trash, I will boycott it.

    To slashdot editors: this can get you page views (and maybe ad clicks) in the short run, but it will scare away thoughtful readers/posters in the long run.

  301. Detecting Pattern. Don't turn your brain off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, I'm neither Left or Right leaning, they are both a part of the problem. That said, I have noticed the press report things Romney says, out of context, making it sound unreasonable, or out of touch, painting this picture of him as a buffoon, and then quietly retracting, or giving the actual context after the damage is done. The public has seized upon the first report, and are buying the portrait wholesale. In all the hullabaloo, don't forget to think for yourself. Romney may not be the smoothest public speaker in the world, but Obama has been a massive failure.

    Since I'm only given these two choices, I haven't closed my mind to Romney. Just because the press is trying to make it easy to dismiss him, while working hard to rationalize every thing Obama has done, I won't stop analyzing the situation. Don't get me wrong, I want a national healthcare system, a well-funded NASA, and other infrastructure improvements that can only come from the federal level, but we are not on that track now, and I don't think we should pretend to be. Unless our economic situation improves, none of those things can be paid for.

    Romney has a successful track record in business and as governor of a liberal state with a public healthcare system that supposedly works. What has Obama actually achieved before or after becoming president, other than getting elected? I don't see much, and giving the order for the Navy Seals to raid Bin Laden's compound was a no-brainer, so no credit there. Not, trying to start a flame war, just saying; think for yourself. Torvalds' reaction seems like a "buy in" to the "Romney is an idiot" campaign, which itself smacks of manipulation. It seems like a lot of people wanted so bad for Obama to be great, that they have taken to any irrational means to defend their dream, but it was just a dream. Time to wake up. If you look at things clearly and still want to vote for him, then knock yourself out, but let the dream go, it's not real, and we all have to live with the results of this election. Or as Clinton's campaign once put it "It's the economy stupid".

    Thanks and goodnight.

  302. He should make it clear by partofthepuzzle · · Score: 1

    I think the only thing Linus needs to do is make it clear that he's speaking as an individual and not in any capacity related to Linux or the Linux community. The fact that he was correct in his assessments is just something that makes me smile. Their size and their business clout, plus a lot of lot PR has given the Mormon religion an aura of normalcy but taken strictly on it's own beliefs and teachings it would be considered a fringe, quite bizarre religious cult. Before anyone jumps up to defend the Mormon Church, go ahead and spend a good 4-5 hours visiting the Mormon complex in Salt Lake City, as I did a couple of years ago while I was passing through the area. Bizarre, intellectually bereft, culturally constricted, frightening political power, spookily secretive. My impression after my visit was that underneath the surface, there is something very unhealthy and more than a little scary going on. I left SLC depressed and concerned.

  303. Linus' Coomments on Romney! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At Least Someone in the Tech Industry has the Cahones to Speak out against a guy Who wears "Sacred Underwear" ,and Believes that His Prophet got His messages from God by Looking into a Hat, Which His friend could Not hear or Acknowledge! Romney is nothing but a Job Outsorcing Corporate Raider,and an Idiot, Every time He comments on Foreign Policy, Our Nation Cringes at his Stupidity,and lack of Understanding of Current Events! He is definitely the Road to the Political Apocalypse ! You Go Linus !!

  304. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  305. What could be more technical by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    than knowing about air pressure differentials of altitudes ?

    Torvalds is right; the leader of the free world must not be a fucking moron.

  306. B@75h!7 (r@z3 by DirtyLiar · · Score: 1

    Meh.

    And I suppose that Mormons that use Linux should be offended and mad at themselves.

    You gotta admit, though, that it wasn't much of a joke, and in poor taste to boot.

    --

    THINK! It's patriotic

  307. What does "Is this just Linus being Linus?" mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Romney a God now, or since when is it "Is this just Linus being Linus?" if you call a spade a spade, so to speak?

  308. You'll get roasted for that by Quila · · Score: 1

    need to grow a pair and take responsibility for their own lives

    Watch out for saying the truth like that. Romney mentioned personal responsibility and is getting nailed in the press for it. Apparently that makes you uncaring and condescending. Bill Cosby even said blacks need to step up with personal responsibility and he was labeled a race traitor.

    1. Re:You'll get roasted for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's being nailed because he said 47% of the population will never vote for him because they don't pay income tax, and that not paying income taxes makes you a lazy moocher (or something to that affect.)

    2. Re:You'll get roasted for that by Quila · · Score: 1

      He was talking about campaign strategy, where to put the advertising dollars and people on the ground, just as Obama was when he spoke about the bitter people clinging to their guns and religion.

  309. Re:Ask Mark Twain about calling a thing by its nam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Judaism, Christianity and Islam (I don't know much about other religions), it is at least plausible that it isn't made up (so long as you don't think too hard about it). With Mormonism it is bloody obvious the book of Mormon was made up by Joseph Smith, so much so that you have to question the intelligence of anyone who believes in it, and whether that anyone who's bullshit detector is so badly broken they can't see Mormonism for the bullshit it is, would make a good leader.

  310. But he is right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He might lack tact, but is right. Romney is stupid and Mormonism is batshit crazy (I fell the same about all religions)

  311. Re:Obama and his policies weaken the constitution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HA! You make it sounds like its all Obamas fault, when in fact Bush, Clinton, Bush and Reagan had more to do with everything happening now.
    From that remark it's obvious what channel you mindlessly watch.

    In fact the current Republicans filibuster all attempts to make things better just to make Obama look bad. And the the Democrats are so weak they cant even pass a jobs bill when jobs are the number one issue!
    They all make me sick.

  312. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  313. You seem to have already made up your mind by brshock · · Score: 1

    You ask, effectively, "Is Linus just one isolated foul-mouthed curmudgeon, or are most Linux developers foul-mouthed curmudgeons?" When things go to hell, the person who keeps his head and holds his tongue... is clearly someone who doesn't care or who doesn't understand the import of what's happened. Mitt "The Twit" Romney is one of the most egregious excretions that U.S. politics has ever produced. His policies would be an abomination, if he actually held to them more than two hours at a time. Linus -- and perhaps the Linux community in general -- values facts, at least insofar as they walk up and kick you in the cojones. If it's irresponsible to express serious disappointment over current events gone obviously, horribly wrong, then we need far fewer responsible citizens. And by the way, is that stick as uncomfortable as it looks?

  314. ???? Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Really? This is how some of your time was spent today?

    There is actually debate on this?

  315. Re:I would not be surprised if he got death threat by Seeteufel · · Score: 1

    What makes a conservative conservative is to leave mud-flinging to the left.

  316. its mormon.org by whtmarker · · Score: 1

    Mormons believe the bible and in it that Jesus Christ, is the son of God, died on the cross, and was resurrected. Doesn't that make them christians? What makes them different from other christians is the fundamental belief that Jesus Christ also visited one of the lost tribes of Israel after he was resurrected "other sheep I have not of this fold..." as recorded in the Book of Mormon.
    The site that goes over their beliefs is actually http://mormon.org/
    For instance http://mormon.org/faq/baptism-for-the-dead is actually from the bible

  317. Re:Detecting Pattern. Don't turn your brain off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my thoughts exactly. too bad your comment got buried under all the "romney is a mor(m)on" shite.

  318. was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linus was correct when he said Romney was a Moron and Mornism was batshit crazy.

    That said, Linus does not speak for anyone buy himself. Dick "Toe Cheese Eater" Stallman, already laid claim to that right to speak for the Free Software Community.

  319. Get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh boohoo. Linus used profanity. Now I must go out and try to tarnish him.

  320. Re:Detecting Pattern. Don't turn your brain off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The false dream of the great Obama, is as bad as an organized religion. At least the falseness of religions can be masked by the fact that they are based on things that happened in the distant past, before reliable recorded evidence was available. Obama's lack of credentials, leadership experience and accomplishments is clear for us to see, yet people cling to their cult leader.

  321. Re:I would not be surprised if he got death threat by Xandrax · · Score: 1

    That I agree with completely. Unfortunately, only about .000001% of the population (no, not scientific, heh) fails to fall for identity politics and, therefore, not see everyone that disagrees with them as an evil heretic. Congratulations on, apparently, being one of those few.

  322. does such outspokenness on non-technical matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " does such outspokenness on non-technical matters reflect poorly on the Linux community that Torvalds leads?"
    No, it does not.
    Mormonism is batshit crazy. It's right up there with Scientology as a made-up religion.
    Anyone with a scientific or technical background would dismiss it as batshit.
    Most people just respect other people's religion so as not to make disparaging remarks.
    However, as far as Mormonism (and Scientology, and many other religions) go, saying that they are batshit crazy is an understatment.

  323. Re:its moron.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why then do no Christian denominations interact or have joint services with Mormons? Ever.

    Mormonism is a cult.

    It's the easiest cult to disprove because they claim to use the Bible. Then by that measure, there are pages proving Smith was a fraud.

    An anthropologist friend of mine had a conversation with a Mormon.
    Friend: So you're saying that the Jews came to America about 600 B.C.
    Mormon: Yes.
    Friend: You do realize that in 600 B.C. the Jews could make tools and weapons and jewelry?
    Mormon: Yes.
    Friend: So you're telling me that the Jews walked half-way around the world, and as soon as they came to America, they forgot everything that they ever knew? Please show me ONE tool or weapon or piece of jewelry that supports your claims. Show me any of the "ancient" civilizations that you say existed in America. And the best of all, show me the great Mormon plates that Joseph Smith translated.

    The dead sea scrolls have been found to support the Bible, yet there has never been one single shred of evidence to support ANY of Joseph Smiths claims.

    Joseph Smith was a liar and a sexual deviant. Polygamy is never supported in the Bible, yet is a condition of Mormon salvation.

    Adam did not "become" God. God made Adam.

    Jesus and Satan are not brothers. "John 3:16 For God so loved the world that he gave His ONLY begotten son,"

    The Indians are "lamanites?" and are the lost tribe of Israel? Really? How retarded do you have to be to believe that? Put a picture of an Indian next to a Mongolian? See any resemblance?

    Mormons are deceived and in complete bondage. Verify the facts yourself. The link in the original post puts these side by side.

  324. If Linus T. would work in a startup... by sabri · · Score: 1

    Torvalds is a celebrity among the Open Source community, and has notoriety among some of the general public. I think it was completely out of line for Torvalds to call Romney a fucking moron, and the referring to the Mormons as battshit crazy. I am so disappointed in Linus.

    I don't know the man personally, but this article comes to mind...

    --
    I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
  325. Wait, is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is Linus acting out of character? Are we surprised someone would call mittens a moron?

  326. Free BSD for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    guess it'll be Free BSD for me

  327. Re:This is a slashdot story? Seriously? by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

    I haven't known about /. as long as a lot of you, 2 years only,.so I can't know what it was like before then. I've read many saying it's not like it was. Sounds like it's evolved over time. What I like is the varying opinions from everwhere in the world, unfiltered, no matter the subject matter. And as for intelligent 'give and take', I haven't seen an equal to it on the net. Damn good site, imho, and I'd miss it if it stopped being.

  328. Well, there is the book itself by portforward · · Score: 1

    Ignore the fact that Joseph Smith and one of the eight were gunned down by a mob even though they had the chance to run away. Ignore the fact that each of the three witnesses on their deathbed each testified that they had seen the angel and the golden plates. Ignore the fact that more than half of the combined eleven left the church at some point and were offered money to recant, even fifty years after Joseph Smith was dead, and they never took the money. There is physical, tangible evidence of the plates. . . the book itself.

    Joseph Smith was an 18 year old with a third grade education on what was then the frontier of the United States. His family had to move several times as a child, his main occupation was clearing stumps, plowing and digging wells. The Book of Mormon has over 260,000 words (over 500 pages) and is a complex blend of history and theology. As Joseph Smith claims to have translated rather than to have authored the book, it has many features that has it compare to more of a Hebraic text than American Frontier English in the early 19th century. These are Hebrew writing styles and artifacts which typically aren't used in English. For example the Book uses chiasmus, colophones, and adverbials. If you know Hebrew, then you might find this article interesting:

    http://maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/publications/books/?bookid=72&chapid=862

    As for our creator's interest in our behavior, I feel it is because He is our Father. He loves us, much more than we know. Any father would be interested in the well being of his children, and the instructions given are for our benefit. Please tell me, how does a hangover feel? Or getting pulled over for a DUI? My wife was raised in a broken home by an alcoholic grandmother. His commandment to avoid alcohol has been a great blessing for me. As is the commandment to be faithful to my spouse. She is my best friend, and now that I know her as intimately as I do, it would be a tremendous sin to betray her in any way. Since she has shared with me her feelings, her secrets and her trust how could I waste that trust on another throw away relationship? A deep, abiding relationship with one's spouse is a tremendous blessing. If you don't understand this, then I pity you. I have the best friend that anyone could possibly have. You know, one day I got called to Jury duty. She came down with me to the courthouse and wait in the jury waiting room, just to spend time with me.

    I also know that God loves His other children on the earth as much as He loves me, and that they are my brothers and sisters. So, it is my responsibility to love them, even when they insult me.

    Oh yeah, Mormons don't believe angels have wings.

    1. Re:Well, there is the book itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignore the fact that Joseph Smith and one of the eight were gunned down by a mob even though they had the chance to run away. Ignore the fact that each of the three witnesses on their deathbed each testified that they had seen the angel and the golden plates. Ignore the fact that more than half of the combined eleven left the church at some point and were offered money to recant, even fifty years after Joseph Smith was dead, and they never took the money.

      These can be safely ignored because they're not evidence of anything supernatural. Serial killers have gone to their grave denying they've done anything wrong, despite being caught in the act of performing murder. Denal is a powerful thing.

      There is physical, tangible evidence of the plates. . . the book itself.

      This is not evidence of anything of the sort. The Son-of-Sam's Testimony that the dog made him do it is not evidence of a magic mutt. Your example is evidence that someone wrote words.

      Joseph Smith was an 18 year old with a third grade education on what was then the frontier of the United States. His family had to move several times as a child, his main occupation was clearing stumps, plowing and digging wells. The Book of Mormon has over 260,000 words (over 500 pages) and is a complex blend of history and theology.

      It is not a "blend of history and theology." To be a blend of history and anything else it needs to contain hstorical facts of the verifiable variety. The book of mormon contains no such things.

      As Joseph Smith claims to have translated rather than to have authored the book, it has many features that has it compare to more of a Hebraic text than American Frontier English in the early 19th century. These are Hebrew writing styles and artifacts which typically aren't used in English. For example the Book uses chiasmus, colophones, and adverbials.

      It does not. It was originally claimed to be an egyptian dialect and no matter which way you slice it, it boils down to the writings of a poorly educated, if imaginative, con man.

      If you know Hebrew, then you might find this article interesting:

      http://maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/publications/books/?bookid=72&chapid=862

      ; ,

      As for our creator's interest in our behavior, I feel it is because He is our Father. He loves us, much more than we know. Any father would be interested in the well being of his children, and the instructions given are for our benefit.

      There is no evidence of that. There is no evidence of a creator. There is no evidence it is a he. There is no evidence it issues instructions. There is no evidence of any anthropomorphism you have supplied.

      Please tell me, how does a hangover feel?

      Like a headache that goes away, unlike religion, which lingers over much.

      Or getting pulled over for a DUI?

      Like getting pulled over for speeding, except with a sleepover at the end that is unwelcome, largely unmemorable, and topped off with a hangover, bad food, and a $1500 bill due your lawyer.

      My wife was raised in a broken home by an alcoholic grandmother.

      Which, if you follow your logic, was the will of god, so you can't really bitch, can you?

      His commandment to avoid alcohol has been a great blessing for me.

      I would say that your wife's avoidance of alcohol has been of benefit to her. Who gives a shit how it has benefited your ego.

      As is the commandment to be faithful to my spouse.

      It says a lot about your character that you need an invisible monster king to tell you not cheat on your wife: I do that perfectly well without demands or

  329. Yet another reason to use FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Projects involving a BDFL tend to suffer, in reputation if not in functional potential, when s\he says or does something stupid. Among operating systems, this applies to Linux as well as OpenBSD, Minix, and others - but not to FreeBSD.

    And this was indeed a very stupid thing to rant about. Romney was obviously joking. (Coincidentally, designing an aircraft fire extinguishing system that uses a rapid burst of cold air from the outside to "blow out" the flame, while probably not the most practical approach, is not outside the realm of possibility.) The only reason why anyone would lash out at Romney in this way is due to prior political convictions against him.

    Celebrity programmers are obviously entitled to their opinions, but putting so much emotion into a political preference, even on a personal blog, inevitably influences the culture of their projects. The peer pressure among naive young people to support "liberal" (in USA'ian usage, s/liberal/socialist/) causes continues to grow. People who like Romney (or at least see him as a lesser evil among the viable candidates, as I do) will no longer feel welcome in the Linux world.

    The choice of a restrictive anti-business "copyleft" license was of course a much bigger reason for non-socialists to avoid Linux, but now we have one more.

    --libman

  330. Re:Apparently They Think This Might Deter New User by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    How is it logical to support a presidential candidate so dumb he doesn't know why windows don't open on airplanes? Seems the "logical" approach includes laughing at the worse candidate in order to support the demise of his campaign.

  331. How does it reflect badly? by BlueAdept · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I don't see the problem here... A politician who's main exposure in Europe is for the crazy things he's said about religion and civil rights, who believes that a convicted conman found and translated tablets which then mysteriously disappeared... and learned that Jesus was in Utah among other things... well... that politician shouldn't pretend to be stupid for a joke, if that's what it was... becuase people will see past the joke, and just think he's stupid.

    --
    Who is Seg Fault, and what is he doing with Kernel Space?
  332. I wonder how long it will be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    till Colbert jokes about this.

  333. Linus is right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Moron Church is worse than Scientology. It is a dangerous, violent cult and we don't need a cult member running
    our country.

  334. So ... Linus has two braincells to rub together .. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    ... and has seen through the idiot Romney. Well colour me abso-fucking-lutely astonished. Not.

    Bearing in mind that Linus is from a Scandinavian background, he probably looks at the political scene in the US as being a choice between insanely right wing and batshit-insane right wing. Which is probably being a bit excessively kind to the US political scene.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  335. Truth hurts sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mitt Romney IS! a FUCKING MORON! I didn't make him stupid. Mitt did that all by himself he shows it each time his mouth opens and stupid shit pours out. Sorry but its the truth. Linus is just making a obersvation.

    Best to keep your mouth shut and let people think you are a fool
    Than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

  336. No longer? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure they ever could, but I would agree they are even less so now.

    Part of it is trying to get votes from everyone, I doubt many believe in anything other than what they need to believe in order to get a particular vote, Mittens is likely ahead of his time with the whole Obamacare thing.

    The other part is the level of Corporate involvement, which as a rule a Corporation is the very antithesis of "sane" or "rational", they are their own crazy entities that exist for one purpose, and the fact that they exert the control that they do, only exaberates the whole irrational process.

  337. Re:Ask Mark Twain about calling a thing by its nam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just so you know, not all religions are about crosses and magic men.

  338. Re:Romney *is* a moron by OneAhead · · Score: 1

    Whooosh!

  339. Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Or does such outspokenness on non-technical matters reflect poorly on the Linux community that Torvalds leads?"

    When asked the Linux community directly their answer was "Eat a bag of shit.".

  340. I guess Linus is a moron anyways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He sounds like euro chick with period. Who thinks that only she keeps all the keys to the knowledge. And if somehing doesnt fit. It must be stupid because shes not smart enough to understand this. Riiiiight way to go. If you leftist so smart why you dont move to comunist China? All the technology and wellbeing comes straight from Adam Smith ideas. Not Karl Marx but you guys have to spend a week in a work camp to underatand this I guess. Smart people can predict outcomes ang morons have to feel the pain, just dont force rest of us to follow.

  341. Re:Irrelevant Person A criticizes Irrelevant Perso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous Coward criticises both.

  342. What is the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Romney is demonstrably a fucking moron so calling a fucking moron is merely redundant.

  343. It doesn't reflect poorly by superwiz · · Score: 1

    It reflects properly on all experts who voice opinions in subjects which are not matters of their expertise. If you think this was out line, you should have read Terrance Tao's G+ post on why math is different from other fields of study. He trashed essentially anything else that humans do even though he only has cursory familiarity with it. Experts are human. Humans are fallible.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  344. I don't see the problem by jd · · Score: 1

    Linus has already stated that he is our God. If he was going to offend (a) the religious types, or (b) any Gods that happen to be out there, he passed that mark a long time ago.

    Is he going to insult those who already sided with Microsoft in deeming Free/Libre/Open Source "communism" and "anti-American"? I would be truly impressed if he managed to alter their opinion one way or another by one iota.

    Is he going to harm Linux? Depends - if Linux becomes the "de-facto" OS for Democrats, then we could see remarks like this turning our current 1-2% market share into a 40-50% market share. Y'know, I don't give a fetid wombat WHO he offends if his remarks can achieve that! If he wants to verbally rake over the coals each and every demographic that will never buy into the OS, then provided he does so in a way that boosts popularity with the people who matter, GO FOR IT!

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  345. Linus is 100% correct by Skiboy941 · · Score: 1

    Romney is a f***ing moron. As for the Mormon comment, he is still 100% correct. I don't believe in gods, demons, ghosts, or gremlins. As if religion wasn't already silly enough, the Mormons had to make it even sillier with their magic underwear.

  346. A list of people who care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....Yup, that's about it.

  347. To the anonymous coward by portforward · · Score: 1

    You ignore evidence. You simply wave your hand that it doesn't apply. Does a poorly educated 19th century American plowman know what Chiasmus is let alone use it properly? What about all the other Hebrew language artifacts that I pointed out in the reply? You ignored it. If you were as familiar with the book as you claim to be, then you would know that the "reformed Egyptian" was chosen because the text was compact, but the writers never felt comfortable in the language. They preferred another. If eleven men were brought into a courtroom and testified in a trial, and they testified of a single thing even if someone of them hated the defendant would you ignore their testimony? Just because you haven't seen God doesn't mean others haven't. Have you ever prayed? Look, I don't insult Atheists because at one point in my life I probably was one. But prayer brought me back.

    I'm sorry it seems that your argument boiled down is
    I don't believe God exists.
    Therefore everyone who believes God exists is lying or delusional.
    No other explanation is possible.

    I've seen statistical studies done similar to the studies done on the Federalist Papers that identify that James Madison was the principal author that show that Joseph Smith, Nephi, Alma, and Mormon were different authors. I've seen archaeological studies that show the account of Nephi travelling through the arabian peninsula and burying a party member in a place called Nahom was pretty spot on (including the burial place called Nahom). I've read accounts from non-Mormon scholars of how the "Tree with white fruit" fits spot on with what is known of pre-exilic Judaism worship with how symbols are used. I've seen how both Egyptian and non biblical Hebrew people and place names are used throughout the book in appropriate ways. I've seen comparisons between Semitic and Uto-Aztecan languages. There are other evidences. I'd share them with you but you don't want to engage. You tell and shout, but don't want to learn. You don't even want to step from behind the anonymous coward.

    You call Him a monster, I call Him Father. He answers prayers and no amount of insults from an anonymous coward can convince me otherwise.

    Whenever you want to discuss seriously my faith, I am here. Step out from behind your anonymity.

  348. Not very deep with his comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stephen Hawking wrote: "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it's the illusion of knowledge."
    This guy is obviously NOT a deep thinker.

  349. Obama - Destroyer Of Due Process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IeuE16LLDY&feature=fvwrel

    And no, not an endorsement of Romney, just the disgust about Obama. Indeed, AlQaea has won in changing America into the direction of the AlQaeda home country, Saudi Arabia. Land Of The Shackled.

    All the spooks who read this message - in Ft Meade, Frankfurt and elsewhere - what are you exactly fighting for ? For unlimited executive power ? If so, harass me, as you did in the past. YOUR liberties will be destroyed by this law.

  350. One thing I really hate about this society by morgauxo · · Score: 1

    One thing I really hate about this society is that stating the obvious but inflammatory 'reflects poorly' on anyone. Mormonism IS bat shit crazy (although so are most other religions). Really, read up on what they believe some time if you don't believe me. It's not quite as bad as Scientology but it's up there with it! Also, anybody who says being able to open airplane windows makes people safer IS 'A F***in Moron'. Unless maybe he did mean it as a joke. Then so what.. how badly should not realizing somebody is joking when they say something that is F***ing Moronic reflect on someone anyway?