I remember it. It was long time ago, but I definitely remember this particular design. Funny. I workedfor some time as coach in local school club - bodybuilding and boxing. Stupid Moscow 15-17 year old kids who consumed ungodly amount of various steroid shit - could not make'em stop - probably now can not even walk straight, say nothing about having a hard on.;(
you are talking about? Downfall? Does it matter what system they were using? MS systems are plaqued by THOUSAND of viruses and vulnerabilities. How did you like "Russian New Year" Is it MS downfall? They did not seem to even notice. sheesh..
I found it is the font size problem. For some reason the range of sizes becomes too big on a single page - I do not see that with NT version of Netscape. I have installed all fonts for X I could find, including Type1 an TT. Even with a right font - I find the rendering to be shitty under X. Probably its my personal perception... Bring back display PostScript. My old Next box was rather decent in this regard.
my system is very, very decent. upgraded very good 17" trinitron to a better 19" latest Hitachi tube. 16Mb card. Same at home. Maybe I just see the defects better? I also have too sensitive eyes:( Also I just gave up tuning Netscape under Linux so it uses nice sized fonts. On some pages it will always screw up.;( Somebody - please, write an improvment to current X system. peace.
I was not talking about MS as a credible competitor. Overall it sucks. Just my eyes somehow prefer NT, which I boot when I do typing/reading. I can only stand fixed font under X - in Emacs. Somehow X manages to screw up the look of TT fonts beyond my toleration limit.;( (I use KDE) and WWW browsing is just horrible, whatever tweaking you do with the Netscape. too bad...
Can anybody tell me - will the next version of X windows support nice looking fonts. It is just terrible now. And OpenGL acceleration. Got no Voodoo, just ATI but want to play some games. Any progress in that direction - of making standard graphic extensions for Linux's X windows?
I remember it. It was long time ago, but I definitely remember this particular design. ;(
Funny.
I workedfor some time as coach in local school club - bodybuilding and boxing. Stupid Moscow 15-17 year old kids who consumed ungodly amount of various steroid shit - could not make'em stop - probably now can not even walk straight, say nothing about having a hard on.
Stanford University Whois Service
o ry/whois/whois.faq.html
Do "whois help" for general info. Do "whois update" for entry update info.
For answers to frequently asked questions, see the Web page at URL
http://www.stanford.edu/group/networking/direct
name: wearables
node-type: Host
cpu: pc 486
op-sys: Linux (Redhat 5.2)
department: Computer Science
organization: Theory
building: Gates Computer Science Building
user: Vaughan
protocol: IP
net-software: Built-in
interface:
ip-number: 171.64.78.242
active: YES
use-bootp: YES
administrator:
1) name: Action
e-mail: action@theory
phone: 51451
2) name: Vaughan Pratt
e-mail: pratt@cs
phone: 3-2943
title: Professor
updated-by: me
date-updated: Jan 23 1999 10:42AM
and working fast.
and says it is not good...
you are talking about? Downfall? Does it matter what system they were using?
MS systems are plaqued by THOUSAND of viruses and vulnerabilities. How did you like "Russian New Year" Is it MS downfall? They did not seem to even notice.
sheesh..
How many jerks will log in before they shut it down behind a password... I wonder.
but it still works... though i'm on the same subnet...
fuck, that's a bit expensive..
I found it is the font size problem. For some reason the range of sizes becomes too big on a single page - I do not see that with NT version of Netscape.
I have installed all fonts for X I could find, including Type1 an TT.
Even with a right font - I find the rendering to be shitty under X. Probably its my personal perception...
Bring back display PostScript. My old Next box was rather decent in this regard.
..who have not got a clue, what security is about...
..all this 25000 MS developers are busy with...
my system is very, very decent. upgraded very good 17" trinitron to a better 19" latest Hitachi tube. 16Mb card. Same at home. :( ;(
Maybe I just see the defects better? I also have too sensitive eyes
Also I just gave up tuning Netscape under Linux so it uses nice sized fonts. On some pages it will always screw up.
Somebody - please, write an improvment to current X system.
peace.
..did a search and found their web site. Great. Hope it will be done soon. Really great.
I was not talking about MS as a credible competitor. Overall it sucks. Just my eyes somehow prefer NT, which I boot when I do typing/reading. I can only stand fixed font under X - in Emacs. Somehow X manages to screw up the look of TT fonts beyond my toleration limit. ;( (I use KDE) and WWW browsing is just horrible, whatever tweaking you do with the Netscape. too bad...
Can anybody tell me - will the next version of
X windows support nice looking fonts. It is just terrible now.
And OpenGL acceleration. Got no Voodoo, just ATI but want to play some games.
Any progress in that direction - of making standard graphic extensions for Linux's X windows?
Give me Libertarian Socialism or give me death. I can't stand to watch our individuality slip away any longer.
No offense, but I'd prefer to give death... Hadenough socialismin my life. And don't tell me it was not what it should be. It was all that's possible.
...boring reiteration..
- no Mozilla for me ;)
Why? - my bank requires it for a "bill payer" - rather necessary application for me...
How much you will put? I will take.. ;)
..obviously ?
this 31337 abbreviation used around? (I'm not a native English speaker. Guess it some slang?)
... my native language is:
..did I double post?
English
French
German
Spanish
Italian
Chinese
Japanese
Russian
Penguinian
..
..how foreign goverments allow MS to supply products to key industries...
...What's next ?
What is the best reason to actually attend this - rather than reading reports about it?