Slashdot Mirror


World's Smallest Web Server

NYC writes " Definitely check out this site. The web site is running of a computer measuring 2.7" by 1.7" by .25" for a volume of about a cubic inch. The processor is an AMD 486-SX with 16MB of RAM running RedHat 5.2. Super Cool." Update: 01/25 01:12 by CT : Didn't take long: It got cracked and taken down a few hours ago.

113 comments

  1. neeto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks cool, just what I need to run my personal web page from :]. BTW FIRST!(@$!24

  2. This one isn't so big either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.windweb.wrs.com/

  3. No Subject Given by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hrm where could someone get one of those....

    It would fit in your pocket and you could get a parellal port to hook into some type radio to send data...

    You could could run shell account for 5 bucks.

    Stick the computer into your pants pocket and then people would be able to login to your pants!!


    I really want one.

  4. Can you say beowulf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't mind having a beowulf cluster made of these.

    -Dan

  5. Coool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all I can say.. and it's still serving
    at 42 bytes/sec while being /.'ed. Go Linux! :)

  6. RedHat? Oh, no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, no, it'll crash! They should get something better than it!

  7. Can you say beowulf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may very well see them. NASA may very well use this kind of tech in their future probes. Be great to see a bunch of space-suited Tuxes with a NASA-Beowulf emblem on their suits exploring the surface of Mars....

  8. Threshold of the /. effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's chugging along now... amost at the point of being offically Slashdotted. It's still an impressive little bugger.

    737 lives

  9. Uhm... and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pilots are about the same physical size and have been availible off the shelf for 3-4 years now. We've had a web server (http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/rees/pilot/) for quite some time.

  10. an affordable pocket pc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you need is a small keyboard, like the one on the xybernaut (http://www.xybernaut.com/), a small lcd display, and you can have a computer on your wrist.

  11. Can you say beowulf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At ALE, corel had a stack of ten netwinder motherboards setup as a beowulf. They told me that they were going to make a commercial one peice 10 CPU cluster out of it. I wonder how the sale will affect their plans.

  12. HD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the disk? It says it has an IDE interface but the size doesnt seem to include the disk, we're being duped! it's really 4 times that size!

    Still cool though

  13. Does size matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure it does! How nice it would be if I could throw out that ugly big gray metal container PC I have under my desk. Replace it with another, not much larger then the harddisk it contains.

    PC:s sucks because there're ugly, big, noisy and inherits bad HW design from ancient times.

  14. PIC server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw something in Circuit Cellar Ink magazine about a PIC chip (tiny microcontroller) that was programmed to speak PPP, returned pings, and was a tftp server. All in an 8-pin DIP package, AFAIK. Anyone have any info on this (the issue was sometime around last summer; I believe it was a recap of PIC contest results)?

    Brad Keryan
    keryan+toadsslh@andrew.cmu.edu

  15. 7:56 pm EST, hits count down to 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must've gone down. Was at 4155 at 7:55, down to 1 at 7:56. Wonder if it crashed or was just brought down for... um. Maintenance.

  16. So how much do those little fuckers cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how much do those little fuckers cost? I can think of about a million things to do with them if they are like throw-away cheap. All that PC104 stuff looks cool until you find out its 100x the cost of the Baby-AT version.

  17. RedHat? Oh, no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. NT forever...

    If you just put the esseintial services on it, such as MS PLUS!, Office 97 SP3, and that TCP/IP thingy, you'd be set!

  18. Who needs a StrongARM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The argument for the StrongARM in the NetWinder has been that it's smaller, cheaper, and draws less juice. Hmmm. And this thing runs x86 Linux! No need to wait for the ports.

    (I know the StrongARM is faster...of course.)

  19. Mine's bigger than yours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alright all you horny geeks -- try this one. 233Mhz Pentium with built-in video and the size of a credit card:

    http://www.cellcomputing.com/

  20. hacked? already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listen up guys, you need to set a freaking root password on this box, lest a real hax0r decides to be a jerk to you!

  21. The box appears cracked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It appears the box has been cracked. The cracker used the word "Hax0r". I can't overstate how much I dislike words like that. Along w/ l33t and all the other lame mispellings that have showed up over the years.

    EMice

  22. Cracked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahahaha

  23. The smallest hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just went there & apparently someone broke into the machine. A ./ing sideeffect?

    -jeff Gondek, gondek.1@osu.edu

  24. and it's out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they have now taken the site down.
    i tried to put in a passwd for root,
    but people kept reinstating the blank passwd.

    weird to see 16 root logins.

  25. For what it's worth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is another "world's smallest" web server. Not running Linux tho'.

  26. Sheesh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (rant)
    You people...

    What's with everyone? It never even occurs to me to try to log into someone's server as root. It's not my damn server and not my damn business. And yet, someone got a jolly (a lot of you all, apparently), off of logging in as root on something that's not even yours! Kiddies, grow up!
    (/rant)

    1. Re: Sheesh... by gavinhall · · Score: 1

      Posted by neuralfraud:

      Damn straight. Its very upsetting to know people actually pride themselves on ruining someone elses computer, for no reason. and people who take the time to make kernel exploits, you can all rot! people think they're so el33t if they can make your box crash, its not elite, its destructive, and its a disgrace to the linux community! linux is ragged on for its lack of security because people like that.

      so, is there a mirror of this page anywhere? =)

  27. The downfall.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There have been 2 post on slashdot today that really bother me. This one and the one about the trojan. This kind of activity will be the downfall of the Open Source community. Tis is exactly why most companies will not use OSS. All I can say is that it's a good thing that there are respectable people in the OSS community like Drwiii that halted the computer. I myself was really interested in this story for the technological value.

    mec

  28. mirrored at www.mcsrepair.com/html/mirror-w.htm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just put a mirror of the main page up

    www.mcsrepair.com/html/mirror-w.htm

    no big/alt pic.... just the normal front page pic

    set the counter to 4155 as a starting point since that seems to be the last known count...

    just though others would like to read this before they get it back up.

    hope they don't mind..........
    mikeskup@mcsrepair.com

  29. general purpose computers considered dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The irony of the wearable getting hacked is that the page makes the argument that general purpose computers will replace embedded computers. Hmm, yeah, and what happens when a script kiddie hax0rs the local nuke power plant's embedded temperature controller? Hmm, maybe general purpose computers aren't such a great idea in embedded situations after all.

  30. mirror up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    For anyone that cares:

    mirror up @ http://www.cybertechs.com/~benefits/s tanford/

    Don't /. it too hard...

    (benefits@ guy...)

  31. Call Guiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    16 hackers in a matchbox, must be some kind of record :)

  32. No Subject Given by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine at the NSA just sent me this excerpt from a memo he got hold of:
    ************

    ...On January 24, 1999, members of the NSA'a National Information Security Countermeasures (NISC) group, in conjunction with information systems specialists and psychologists at Stanford University, conducted a test to monitor and assess hacker behavior in response to a "honeytrap", a system intentionally set up to allow intrusion in order to gather information about hackers.

    To attract subjects, a web page purporting to be hosted by a miniature computer was posted on the web and the address submitted to Slashdot, a known hacker web site.

    A team of Stanford and NSA psychologists and network specialists monitored all access to this computer in real time. In actuality, the target system was a Sun Enterprise 10000 "Starfire" server running Solaris. This system hosted a Linux Redhat emulation running under the NSA's Honeytrap Generator D5 software (HGD5).

    The technical aspects of the test were a complete success. Apparently, none of the subjects detected that the machine was not in fact running Linux. This is not surprising, since the emulator was running the actual Linux code base, albeit in a virtual machine controlled by the HGD5 system, which performed flawlessly.

    Unfortunately, the initial test cannot be considered an unqualified success. It appears that due to the ease of entry into the target
    system, too low a caliber of hacker was attracted. A trivial degree of mischief was performed before the emulation was rendered
    unavailable to subsequent attackers due to institution of a root password.

    Early analysis indicates that at least one hacker installed a back door account in order to permit login after the root password had been set. Traces on the source IP addresses have been completed, and once identified, further investigation and prosecution of the individuals concerned will handled in conjunction with the FBI.

    A primarily early conclusion to be drawn from this test is that subsequent tests must be more carefully designed to make initial access appear more difficult. Inexperienced amateur hackers, who have no apparent purpose other than to create minor mischief, must be screened out. This should allow future tests to attract more serious
    subjects whose actions will be worth monitoring.

    As an aside, it was gratifying to note that certain individuals entering the decoy system did so with no malicious intent, in fact with the apparent intent to prevent further hacking by others. These individuals should be investigated, and if they pass security
    screening, contacted as possible recruits for the NISC Task Force currently being assembled.
    ************

    While I'd love to attach my real name to this, for obvious reasons I'd better not.

    Just call me...
    -boupo2384

  33. harhar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nifty thing... My first thought was, of course, clustering, but the thingies are far too powerless for computation-oriented clusters, and too much of a single BIG SPOF for High-Availability-oriented clusters... (damn I want MOSIX, damn I want a journalling FS for Linux) But, hey, the website is still great... I just cannot express my feelings about seeing that matchbox... These cool thingies with absolutely horridly missspelled "body building" on them... aaaaah... seen a few thousands of them as a kid :)

  34. There was no password, dude! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moron, it was intentionally left with no password so people could play. Its such a feat to crack a machine you are allowed on isn't it? About the same difficulty level as causing an invisable object to disappear.

  35. QUIT WHINING GUYS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did somebody notice WHY did the little box go down?
    SOMEBODY FROM SLASHDOT DID IT TO PREVENT MALICIOUS HACKER'S DAMAGE!
    Btw: 10 hackers online at any given time, yet they did nothing except trying to:
    a) Set a password for root to avoid malicious hackers
    b) Undo somebody's setting of a password for root (Information Wants To Be Free, do someone remember ITS?)
    c) Try to bring it down so the sysadmin will 'see it was hacked and protect it'
    And it gives us a clue about the /. readers REAL personality.
    My $0.02

  36. Not Cracked! Left open for explorers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What had happened is that I'd left it wide open (no root password) thinking that maybe one or two visitors might show some
    initiative and log in and explore around. I wasn't at all worried about anybody breaking anything since the 16MB flash can be
    "reset" just by attaching an IDE drive and dd'ing back the image of /dev/hda, all you lose are the accumulated statistics.

  37. Screw the webserver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummmm you all are missing the point...what the hell is up with that matchbox? They couldn't find one from Chez Bubba's or something?????

  38. Can we say ENTRAPMENT anyone??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Early analysis indicates that at least one hacker installed a back door account in order to permit login after the root password had been set. Traces on the source IP addresses have been completed, and once identified, further investigation and prosecution of the individuals concerned will handled in conjunction with the FBI."

    I'm sure the FBI of all organizations is aware of the term "entrapment". You can not set up a server with no security whatsoever for the sole purpose of catching crackers, then turn around and prosecute them when they've done exactly as you've planned them to do.

    Of course, I know that "memo" was BS, but this statement stands out amongst all the rest. The later paragraph stating they're more interested in higher calibre crackers than the ones they got. Well, what exactly did they expect huh?

    Their ploy would have been analogous to writing in HUGE letters the words "SPRAY PAINT ME" on a wall, then arresting everyone who actually tries to spraypaint the wall.

    But its BS, so I don't really care.

    -Restil
    restil@alignment.net

  39. Imagine concealed webcams... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take one of these, add one of the tiny cameras and some kind of net connection, and you've got a complete webcam system about the size of a box of matches.

    (BTW, the site is back up now.)

  40. That is what I am afraid of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Actually, I am seriously considering blowing my 1998 tax refund on some of this miniature PC hardware and wiring it to my car. Either that, or an Empeg."

    Yeah, that could be cool. Make some really interesting movies to show your friends (or post on the web).

    I can see it now.

    "And here is an *sshole in a volvo that almost took my front end off. Oh, look it is the buttmunch that decided that 45 in the fast lane is good enough."

    Fun!

  41. harhar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ummmm". "Dood". Not everything thats a collector item here is 90 yrs old, hm? Better try studying some matchbox-design-in-USSR history books *gg* before callin' somebody a liar. Go sit down in a corner. Like Axe already said, the design is from the early 90s, maybe late 80s. Seen tons of that stuff.

  42. wear panties... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at all times. be very careful before you pull them off!

  43. Another one, while we're on the subject... by bob · · Score: 1

    Check out JK Micro's FlashTCP Embedded Web Server . Remember that these things are designed to simply feed monitoring info up onto the net; they're not designed to be computing powerhouses...

  44. Well, why not... by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 1

    Give it an 5x86-133 and a nice little heatsink? :)

    --
    Brian Fundakowski Feldman
  45. hmm by drwiii · · Score: 1

    So if it gets slashdotted, will it burst into flames?

  46. poor thing by drwiii · · Score: 1

    This can't be good.. LINK

  47. No Subject Given by torpor · · Score: 1

    "A trivial degree of mischief was performed before the emulation was rendered unavailable to subsequent attackers due to institution of a root password."

    Hah hah, your stupid story would've been semi-believable until I read this.

    It wasn't because of a root password, it was because of a certain fun command involving /proc/kmem ...

    10 points for trying, anyway. Okay, make that 8, no 7 ...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  48. Can you say beowulf? by Peter+Amstutz · · Score: 1

    Dude, those are low-end 486s. It would take at least five of them just to equal a single pentium... Not a very cost-effective beowulf.

  49. It's back up... by phil+reed · · Score: 1
    Here's an update from the web site...
    I spent Sunday (1/24/99) running an Australia Day BBQ at my house which left me no time to pay attention to the server or I'd have noticed the greatly accelerated hit rate brought on by the posting to slashdot. When the last guest had left and I checked my email, I found a sympathy note about the poor little server having been slashdotted to death and a pointer to slashdot.

    What had happened is that I'd left it wide open (no root password) thinking that maybe one or two visitors might show some initiative and log in and explore around. I wasn't at all worried about anybody breaking anything since the 16MB flash can be "reset" just by attaching an IDE drive and dd'ing back the image of /dev/hda, all you lose are the accumulated statistics.

    What I didn't reckon on was having so many entrepreneurial spirits logged on simultaneously, or on someone deciding it would be better to shut the machine down before some real damage was done (fat chance). After rebooting and straighten out a couple of "fixed" files, I decided with regret that maybe a root password would be needed after all if only to avoid these problems.
    --

    ...phil
    "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
  50. To borrow a cliche by Special+J · · Score: 1

    Is that a porno website in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?

    --
    VENI! VIDI! VICI!
  51. CPU power by cduffy · · Score: 1

    A AMD 486 SX chip? Sounds like it wouldn't have enough power to play MP3s... or would it?

    How does this compare to PC104 hardware in terms of power consumption? Cost?

  52. Not that small and bloody expensive by Dave+Fiddes · · Score: 1

    Hmm. An embedded PC running linux is the best we can do for a tiny web server. I don't think so.

    How about a Motorola ColdFire(or 68360 or MPC82x) hooked up to an SMSC LAN91C96 ethernet chip and say 32MB of SDRAM. Total system cost $75 approx.

    CPU is much much more powerful and wouldn't be saddled with a lame OS(for the job) like linux. A far better system to use would be RTEMS-4.0.0 with a nice select() based web server like thttpd. And there'd be plenty of power left to do something useful like run a control system.

    Sounds like a pipe dream? Well I've got most of it already... just need to build a custom PCB.

    The guy's at NetBurner(http://www.netburner.com) have it already.

  53. PC Web Site by Acy+James+Stapp · · Score: 1

    http://www.cellcomputing.com/ These beauties come in up to P233MMX. Of course, the faster ones have a lot higher power consumption.

    --
    -- Too lazy to get a lower UID.
  54. heh, cool by jCaT · · Score: 1


    [~]:--telnet wearables.stanford.edu
    Trying 171.64.78.242...
    Connected to wearables.stanford.edu.
    Escape character is '^]'.

    Red Hat Linux release 5.2 (Apollo)
    Kernel 2.0.36 on an i486
    login: root
    Password:
    [root@wearables]$ ls
    bin etc home mnt tmp var
    boot files lib proc u vmlinuz
    dev hdb2 lost+found sbin usr
    [root@wearables]$ w
    6:01pm up 14:40, 11 users, load average: 0.98, 1.85, 7.59
    USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT
    pratt ttyp0 Coraki.Stanford. 3:21am 7:52m 0.00s ? -
    pratt ttyp1 Coraki.Stanford. 11:16am 6:39m 0.00s ? -
    root ttyp2 ms01-31.vcr.ista 5:57pm 0.00s 0.00s ? -
    root ttyp5 ip173.jackson3.m 5:58pm 5.00s 0.00s ? -
    root ttyp3 x5-11.reshalls.u 6:00pm 9.00s 0.00s ? -
    root ttyp6 209.67.232.125 6:00pm 1.00s 0.00s ? -
    root ttyp4 ppp11-5.ftwotx.o 6:00pm 11.00s 0.00s ? -
    root ttyp7 209.67.232.125 6:00pm 5.00s 0.00s ? -
    root ttyp9 isdn1.arcon-inc. 6:00pm 1.00s 0.00s ? -
    root ttypa xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.x 6:00pm 1.00s 0.00s ? -
    root ttyp8 chernobyl.bitstr 6:00pm 6.00s 0.00s ? -

  55. Anyone have a copy? (Please send.) by rickmoen · · Score: 1

    If anyone has a copy of the original Web page and related .gifs (e.g., in a cache), please e-mail the set to me (or ftp into my /incoming directory), so I can mirror it on http://linuxmafia.com/. The pictures and description are just too priceless to vanish from public view. Thanks.

    Rick Moen
    rick@hugin.imat.com
  56. Can you say beowulf? by nickm · · Score: 1

    Mein Gott! The latency on PLIP would CRUSH a cluster of these things. Besides, Beowulf is a listing of specs that these little dippies certainly don't meet.
    --

    --

    --
    I noticed

    It's getting about time to leave everywhere

  57. RedHat? Oh, no! by nickm · · Score: 1

    Nah, it won't crash.
    Of course, they will need to replace the broken Perl that comes with 5.2....
    --

    --

    --
    I noticed

    It's getting about time to leave everywhere

  58. Can you say beowulf? by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1

    What would be the point really? What would it cost for a 10 system cluster? About $10,000 or so dollars according to prices I have seen posted here. Geez, just buy a Dual PII 450MHz and be done with it...

  59. Great story by Sabby · · Score: 1

    That was a great story. What does "-boupo2384" mean, though?

  60. Can you say beowulf? by BluBrick · · Score: 1

    Yes, but I can't very well spell it with an SX.




    --
    Ahh - My eye!
    The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  61. Neat little webservers by diakka · · Score: 1

    It would be cool to get a whole rack of these little things, say 20 or so per 18 inch rack? Who knows, maybe more.. You could buy them by the stack, and have a single jack for the network card that would connect all of them. I'm still itching to play with the rack mount sidewinders and cobalt servers.
    --

    --
    -- Knowledge shared is power lost. -- Aleister Crowley
  62. Why RH? Use PicoBSD... by Jayson · · Score: 1

    Why are they using a small Red Hat installation. There is this cool thing called PicoBSD for shit like this? No need to reinvent the wheel. PicoBSD is even tuned for the small processor, small memory, diskless configuration.

  63. and it's out! by substrate · · Score: 1

    Read the page some time. The owner of the machine didn't care if people logged in. He purposely left root wide open so that people could explore. He however didn't expect the slashdot effect. Apparently somebody worried about the machine shut it down so that others wouldn't cause harm via root (the somebody was a person who had noticed root was wide open, not the authors) Since the hard drive exists in a flash ROM restore was very simple.

    This is pretty cool though, it may not be useful as an industrial strength web server but its still a really impressive hack of available technology. There are a lot of applications where it could be perfectly suited though. Hook up a bank of CCD cameras to one, write some simple code to serve the frames up as a web page and voila, instant security system.

  64. CPU power by gas · · Score: 1

    I dont understand this. Most 486 is not enough, X11AMP uses about 20% CPU on my p100 and 0.4% on my Celeron 300A. But it cant be 50 times faster, can it? (the bogomips dont think so either)

  65. This isnt normal for RedHat by CrAlt · · Score: 1

    when you install redhat it MAKES you set a root PW...and it also sets it up so u cant telnet in and log in as root.

    --
    I have to return some videotapes...
  66. Hey, Baby.. by Quazi · · Score: 1

    Oh, the possibilities!

    - You've heard of "Internet in a BOX"? Try THIS!
    - "What are you doing?" .. "I'm playing with my SCSI Ultra Wide!"
    - I got all the fsck I need, right here in my pants!

    ..oh dear..

  67. The bloody thing lacks a root password! by Fogie · · Score: 1

    As of 6 pm PST, someone had gotten on there and changed the page,
    basically saying they didn't set a pw for root.
    Wow, this sure reinforces their credentials.

    --
    Adam "Fogie" Fogler -- Professional Paid College Student
  68. Cute... by gr · · Score: 1

    ... but check your grammar next time...

    further investigation and prosecution of the individuals concerned will handled in conjunction with the FBI.

    ... and stop watching those eighties flics.

    contacted as possible recruits for the NISC Task Force currently being assembled.

    --
    Do you have a /. uid shorter than five digits? No? Then piss off.
  69. Someone must've stepped on it by drix · · Score: 1

    ...or something. It's down.

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  70. crackers == assholes by kevin+lyda · · Score: 1

    what was served by bringing it down? the guy had something nifty and he wanted to let the world see it. fine, he apparently left it wide open, *must* people go in?

    every time i get into my car, open the door to my house, or all the other key/pin/card requiring thing i do in life i resent it. i resent that the assholes of the world require me to carry around a little piece of useless metal. that i need to bend over backwards to have the p.o. deliver a package rather then just open my door, and leave it inside. that i can't just lend my friend my car when i'm not around to give them the keys.

    right now we use technology, from locks to crypto, to protect ourselves from our own lack of respect of each other.

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
  71. Not a good thing but..... by Chas · · Score: 1

    In essence, I agree. People need to respect the property of another.

    Unfortunately, this isn't a realistic expectation. There's ALWAYS going to be people going where they're not "supposed to go."

    About the most responsible thing that can and should be done if such an instance is discovered is to log in, initiate a shutdown of the server and fire off an e-mail to the domain holders/server admin address.

    Yes, this IS a form of vandalism. But what would you rather have?

    • A server that was turned off as a form of protection?
    • Or dozens of people, possibly malicious, running around with root access in your system? Corrupted, stolen data. Backdoors all over the place? Someone in control of your system besides yourself?

    Oh well. Hopefully these guys get their software-side shit together. Their hardware-side stuff is pretty killer.


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  72. Wonderful! Cracked by clintp · · Score: 1

    This is just SO good for a website's credibility. Invite the whole friggin' world in, and (apparently) not even set a root password.

    --
    Get off my lawn.
  73. I want this thing with video card by Vitus+Wagner · · Score: 1

    If only this thing have good video card
    and ethernet, I could hide it inside case
    of my monitor and have an X-terminal.
    Just plug mouse and keyboard into monitor
    and attach it to your server with ethernet
    cable and you have one more workplace.
    16Mb 486 is quite enough for X-terminal,
    I'm currently have one with 12.

    And lot of desk space saved.

    Hide another one inside printer and you have
    print-server.
    Yet another in external modem to serve as
    router.

    Voila - no more hell of cables -all the perepherials are connected directly to your local
    net. (Including scanners with sane-net)

    Of course $419 is too much for thing to be
    embedded into each and every piece of hardware.
    But, I hope that if this thing would be produced
    in millions, it would be comparable to match box
    in price too.

  74. Not only little, also fast. by rowan · · Score: 1

    Already 2630 hits and still quitte fast ....
    Very cool!

    --
    *(Another peace of cloth removed from this man ...)*
  75. 300 hits in one minute by rowan · · Score: 1

    The little bastard just survived hits
    from 2600 to 2900 in one minute.

    --
    *(Another peace of cloth removed from this man ...)*
  76. tomorrow by rowan · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to check it back tomorrow.
    Maybe it'll have 10000 hits by than. Let's
    go to bed. Sleep well all you nasty geeks :)

    --
    *(Another peace of cloth removed from this man ...)*
  77. What happens when /. effect hits it? by Signal+11 · · Score: 1



    What'll happen when the /. effect hits monday morning? Will a simple PLIP connection *work* ?

    btw- to the above-poster - grow up.



    --

  78. takes them long enough. by calx · · Score: 1

    What the hell were they thinking?

  79. I think the atrocity is over. by calx · · Score: 1

    Can't telnet, cant ping, the little guy must be tuckered out. Next time, buy a door. Not just the lock.

  80. What about the lil' computer? by calx · · Score: 1

    Does it even exist? =[ There goes my day.

  81. Cool by Poopdbq · · Score: 1

    This is pretty cool. Is an AMD processor the smallest one they could get, or were they just using inexpensive parts?

  82. I was so tempted... by Griim · · Score: 1

    ...to run 'shutdown -h now'

  83. HD? by scrytch · · Score: 1

    Actually I bet we'll find that those sturdy russian matches are the size of 2 by 4's

    --
    I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  84. Jolly Good by DrDev · · Score: 1

    But next time remember, less is more ;-)

    --
    DrDev
  85. WAtch it go up and up and up by NYC · · Score: 1

    Cool, CmdrTaco posted my story. Early today I was visitor #78. After /. it is now up to 1255 and still going strong.

    Sorry to the Standford guys since I posted the story to Slashdot.


    --
    --weenie NT4 user: bite me!
    "Computers are nothing but a perfect illusion of order" -- Iggy Pop
  86. Bulls*** by NYC · · Score: 1

    "To attract subjects, a web page purporting to be hosted by a miniature computer was posted on the web and the address submitted to Slashdot, a known hacker web site."

    This is bull. I submitted the story to /., not some FBI Task Force. I first learned about the web server from a mailing list discussing Future Computing Environments (I forgot who posted it).

    --
    --weenie NT4 user: bite me!
    "Computers are nothing but a perfect illusion of order" -- Iggy Pop
  87. Correction. by Aleksandr · · Score: 1

    If you take a look at the size specs again, you'd realize that this little puppy is less than half the size. Of course, that isn't including a display or power supply. The real item of interest is that it is essentially a tiny AT-style motherboard, unlike the Pilot, which is a strange little beast to most x86 programmers.

    Come call us when you get linux running on your pilot. ;)

  88. ISP in a box? by TrentC · · Score: 1

    I can see it now... shoebox.com.

    Jay (=

  89. 7:56 pm EST, hits count down to 1 by Axe · · Score: 1

    but it still works... though i'm on the same subnet...

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  90. Now a new line... by Axe · · Score: 1

    How many jerks will log in before they shut it down behind a password... I wonder.

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  91. WTF. by Axe · · Score: 1

    you are talking about? Downfall? Does it matter what system they were using?
    MS systems are plaqued by THOUSAND of viruses and vulnerabilities. How did you like "Russian New Year" Is it MS downfall? They did not seem to even notice.
    sheesh..

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  92. It is back... by Axe · · Score: 1

    and says it is not good...

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  93. It is back! by Axe · · Score: 1

    and working fast.

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  94. Notice the building where the computer is hosted by Axe · · Score: 1

    Stanford University Whois Service
    Do "whois help" for general info. Do "whois update" for entry update info.

    For answers to frequently asked questions, see the Web page at URL
    http://www.stanford.edu/group/networking/directo ry/whois/whois.faq.html

    name: wearables
    node-type: Host
    cpu: pc 486
    op-sys: Linux (Redhat 5.2)
    department: Computer Science
    organization: Theory
    building: Gates Computer Science Building
    user: Vaughan
    protocol: IP
    net-software: Built-in
    interface:
    ip-number: 171.64.78.242
    active: YES
    use-bootp: YES
    administrator:
    1) name: Action
    e-mail: action@theory
    phone: 51451
    2) name: Vaughan Pratt
    e-mail: pratt@cs
    phone: 3-2943
    title: Professor
    updated-by: me
    date-updated: Jan 23 1999 10:42AM

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  95. Matchbox.. by Axe · · Score: 1

    I remember it. It was long time ago, but I definitely remember this particular design.
    Funny.
    I workedfor some time as coach in local school club - bodybuilding and boxing. Stupid Moscow 15-17 year old kids who consumed ungodly amount of various steroid shit - could not make'em stop - probably now can not even walk straight, say nothing about having a hard on. ;(

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  96. Nope, it was out in early 90s.. by Axe · · Score: 1

    ..bodybuilding was prohibited sport in good old SSSR.

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  97. sheesh.. you killed the little server by F2F · · Score: 1

    You shouldn't post those things on /. anymore - can you imagine how big of a load the little pecker is having right now? I suppose the cubic inch is now so overwhelmed and will need a total repair... :))

    In a way that might be an interesting issue - how does a "slashdotting" of a server like that effects its productivity :)))

  98. Poor web counter.. by Lord+Greyhawk · · Score: 1

    We seem to have /.'ed the counter on the web page to death.....

  99. That's not the point. by Stiletto · · Score: 1

    When you leave a security hole big enough for the titanic to sail through, you should expect this stuff. It's like leaving your car unlocked, all the doors open, with the keys in the ignition. STUPID!

    I thought Stanford kids were supposed to be brighter than this. Maybe this was good field experience for their computer security 200 class.

  100. Hmmm - It was just hacked by joshv · · Score: 1

    You can telnet into the darned thing, no root
    password.

  101. Multimedia too? by dimer · · Score: 1

    Does it have a CDRom drive?

    (For those 2" CDs I have)

  102. No Subject Given by specht · · Score: 1

    Just follow the link on the page to www.jumptec.de, then go to the components link at the top of the page and select Price List... After a couple other links you will find the data sheet with price list: 599.- DM (the manufacturer is in Germany) for one board.

  103. Good Thread by wilkinsm · · Score: 1

    This thread was really cool reading. I'm ROTFL from all the postings. I think all the hackers/anti-hackers should get a good geek laugh. Perhaps /. should start it's own talk show.

    "Minature PC's, and the guys who love them"
    -wilkinsm

  104. Little more cpu by dirty · · Score: 1

    It would be really cool if they could slip a dx4/133 in there and a dsp, then you could have a tiny little mp3 player. Sure the rio is probally smaller, but IMHO this would be infinitely cooler.

    --

    -matt
  105. So you /. the poor thing by grappler · · Score: 1

    Are we trying to push the micro server to it's limit?

    --
    Vidi, Vici, Veni
  106. RedHat? Oh, no! by Master+Switch · · Score: 1

    NT wont run on just so little ram, let alone reside on 16 meg of rom, let alone run on those parameters, and still run on a 486. If you have ever tried to run NT on a 486, you would quickly come to realize how slow and inefficient NT is.

    --
    -Master Switch, one more element in the machine
  107. CPU power by dwhedon · · Score: 1

    I can get mp3's playing mono at half sample rate, sounds fine to me and I still have about 20% of my cycles to do other things.

    486dx2 66MHz

    That was the main impetus for my switch to Debian from windows two years ago.

  108. No blame falls to NYC . . . by layne · · Score: 1


    I hope it wasn't used as a gateway to further malfeasance; no doubt this was reconnoitered by the root platoon.

    Poor schmucks . . . lab sacked on the lord's day.

  109. I WAS THE ASSHOLE by layne · · Score: 1


    This was not 'nifty', it was not secure.
    This whining along the line of "It never even occurs to me to telnet a host to logon as root because I'm such a benign guy/gal" is the most disturbing if these posts are being made by IT types. I hope I never have to enjoy the consequences of working with you. Here's an observation from my experiences-- equal opportunity laws don't really apply to systems and database admins. No one wants a finger-pointing idealist, optimist, or person of deep religious conviction in charge of systems (which extends to system/data integrity above all else). If this host was owned by actual Stanford CS students, they should consider it a tuition-free but priceless lesson.

    Recently, I logged on with admin priv. to an engineering employees' NT box in order to update a driver a modify the swapfile. I immediately heard some lovely curses and my name called from the cubicle ajoining this workstation . . . very busy visualizer/drafter with a NT blue screen kernal crash. AGP cards were new on the market, his glide.dll thumped him, etc. In the time it took for two boots and a resoltion (seven minutes tops), the first employee had run a wildcard search for documents containing any part of her name and turned up plenty including a disciplinary recommend which she stashed away before meeting my return with a smile. It was, two hours later, emailed with annotations and grammery corrections about the company. I came forward and owned up immediately. That and NOT AN MITIGATION/EXPLANATION OF CIRCUMSTANCE saved my job. The employee was not disciplined. I had, in effect, delivered privledged company information to vendetta. I WAS THE ASSHOLE.

  110. It's not the size of the wave by Mojojojo · · Score: 1

    It's not the size of the wave, it's the motion of the ocean. Gotta say though, I think slash dot has brough this little guy to it's knees I can't hit it worth a damn.

  111. CPU power by sodergren · · Score: 1

    This thing is based on an AMD Elan SC400...
    these are also available in a 100MHz version,
    drop-in compatible (err, solder-in...)

    Additionally, the 66MHz version can be overclocked
    by setting some bits in an internal register; it'll do 100MHz, but it might not be reliable.
    The whole CPU uses a single 32KHz crystal; all
    operating clocks are created by internal PLLs.

    It's really a nice chip; more or less an AT-
    motherboard on a single BGA device.

  112. HD? by Vidar+Hokstad · · Score: 1

    It has a flash disk on board. It has 16MB of storage.