Perhaps it might be possible to "page out" sections of the blockchain once they're verified. Checksum them and delete them from disk. If they're needed for a calculation, re-download and verify them. There should be enough redundancy out there that this wouldn't badly affect things.
And the rear compartment is neither a trunk nor a boot, the front compartment neither a hood nor a bonnet. What do you call them? Do you keep gloves in the passenger-side storage compartment?
Were you not paying attention? The Communists lost because Communism (particularly as practiced by the Soviet Union) is an utterly shitty political system and results in a weak state. Eventually they just couldn't fake anymore and collapsed under their own weight. A divided US would not have been appreciably less strong than a united one (possibly stronger) as both/all parts would likely have continued with a similar amount of economic freedom.
During the last ice-age, we were pretty much not beyond "pointy sticks" in terms of technology. Now we can build houses that in the coldest environments can be heated by the body heat of the occupants alone.
Just because there is a safety test doesn't mean it's definitive on how safe a car is. It may incorrectly test some safety aspects or miss other aspects completely. Some of the tests may need to be weighted differently or may not even be able to be weighted in a rational manner. It's an approximation, an educated guess at how safe a vehicle is and as such, you can't really claim that one car is safer than another based on the score, particularly if the scores are close.
Slashdot Mirror
Perhaps it might be possible to "page out" sections of the blockchain once they're verified. Checksum them and delete them from disk. If they're needed for a calculation, re-download and verify them. There should be enough redundancy out there that this wouldn't badly affect things.
Although it is similar in not having a backing, Bitcoin does not fit the definition of a fiat currency. If anything, it's a concordant currency.
When it comes to organized crime, governments don't like competition.
The people born into socialized healthcare are beginning to come to the end of their lifespans.
I don't think that's it but it's an avenue to explore.
Whoosh?
Yes. Cause almost nobody's heard of global warming...
And the rear compartment is neither a trunk nor a boot, the front compartment neither a hood nor a bonnet. What do you call them? Do you keep gloves in the passenger-side storage compartment?
Judging by all the cops on I-40 in TN who sit on the money side rather than the drug side, yup.
And yet it is the left pushing for "equal time" legislation for the media.
Funny that.
Yes, what happens when...? Do all the airplanes suddenly disappear?
Measurements from 33,231 BC: None recorded.
That's a doubling every decade.
Increasing population also means people starting to live in areas that were previously avoided. Y'know, cause of the floods and mudslides and shit.
Were you not paying attention? The Communists lost because Communism (particularly as practiced by the Soviet Union) is an utterly shitty political system and results in a weak state. Eventually they just couldn't fake anymore and collapsed under their own weight. A divided US would not have been appreciably less strong than a united one (possibly stronger) as both/all parts would likely have continued with a similar amount of economic freedom.
I'm skipping straight to "Climate change - or not"
During the last ice-age, we were pretty much not beyond "pointy sticks" in terms of technology. Now we can build houses that in the coldest environments can be heated by the body heat of the occupants alone.
Sorry, I mean "suicide"
Don't forget suicide.
It's an expensive way to asphyxiate though.
It's "keeping mum" too. Idioms should be used properly.
Perhaps. But you miss his point.
Why buy one computer and wait a thousand hours for the result when you can rent a thousand computers and have the result in an hour?
(assuming your calculation can be scaled that way, of course).
Just because there is a safety test doesn't mean it's definitive on how safe a car is. It may incorrectly test some safety aspects or miss other aspects completely. Some of the tests may need to be weighted differently or may not even be able to be weighted in a rational manner. It's an approximation, an educated guess at how safe a vehicle is and as such, you can't really claim that one car is safer than another based on the score, particularly if the scores are close.
I'd prefer someone used the square brackets than me reading the article expecting them to do a shoulder roll at any second.
Also to avoid prudish filters. Something the writer often has no control over.
Paragraph 1 of RFC:
User SHALL register for Google Plus