Verizon actually acknowledges that FIOS increase revenue and reduces costs. I'm guessing the problem is running fiber has a 2-3 year break even, which is too long for a public company worried about quarterly returns.
Airbags are for your head, seat belts are for your torso. If you enjoy slamming your head into your steering wheel, go ahead and disable your airbag. Even more fun are videos of an asymmetric head-on collision that favors one side over the other. The test dummies slam their heads into the frame of the car unless you have properly working forward and side airbags.
My ISP ran fiber to every house in the city, customer or not. Cheaper that way. Even customers that are several miles outside the city limits got fiber, all on the ISP's dime, no local, state, or federal government grants or loans. Verizon is just greedy.
FreeBSD is written and used by Sysadmins. Maybe the Linux people will learn to appreciate good design from the get-go instead of "Lets fork it!". A well designed system should work within the 80/20 rule. A single distro should be used by 80% of the user base, if it not, something is wrong.
Re:Unity is rubbish. Systemd is rubbish
on
Ubuntu Turns 10
·
· Score: 1
"Mainstream" in this context is the average homeuser demographic, not the custom workstation demographic. Show me a popular desktop or laptop computer targeted to parents, grand parents, or gamers that have Linux installed by default.
If it floats, it will be neutral because it will displace as much water equal to its own mass. If it sinks, it will displace less water than equal to its own mass.
I don't have a CS degree, but I have a similar one. When I was a Freshman back around 2004, one of the fist things I learned in 100s level class was how to use parameterized inputs, and how not to designs your SQL queries to be injectable. That information alone could save the industry billions a year. Bad schools or bad programmers, not sure which.
Most trash I know has a grasp on practice, but doesn't understand theory. They have hard time understanding edge cases or scaling. The opposite is knowing theory but no practice, but anyone can get practice. It's hard to get theory self taught, the internet is sparsely populated with good theory and lots of bad ideas. Plenty of code examples.
1) X devs with decades of understanding and benchmarks claim X has horrible bottlenecks that can make Wayland 10x-100x faster for cases that are becoming more common
X is inherently flawed and cannot be fixed without breaking other things. This issue is similar to the IPv4 exhaustion problem. We're hitting limits and there's no way to fix it. People who claim it can be fixed can make the fixes. The X devs are saying X is inherently broken. One of the louder X "haters" has been working on X for over 25 years and has been a senior X programmer for a long time. X is a lost cause when the only people who know how it work are the ones saying it's horrible.
I was under the impression that quantum tunneling more has to do with quantum level stuff having a chance to appear any where in the universe, but has a much higher chance of appearing near its current location. If a location is impossible to get to via classical means, that doesn't stop the fact that the particle may just appear where by chance.
My very layman's understanding that may be quite wrong. Yes? No?
That was not my experience. Had someone harassing my wife. The police told her to lock down her FB account so other people can't see. That stopped the first wave, but then her friends started getting hit with stuff, so my wife would see the posts. Reported it to the police, they forwarded it to FB, posts were pulled hours later.
From what we were told by the police, FB found the real account of the person who was creating fake accounts and warned them to stop or be banned. Problem solved, no judge involved.
The police told us this was pretty standard stuff. Unfortunately, the person harassing my wife was in another state, otherwise they would have been arrested. The officer did call the person, we knew their phone number, and told them any further harassment would result in a warrant for their arrest in our state. Something a person who was a nurse that worked with children would not want. Crazy person I tell ya.
Even if not libel, it falls under harassment. As long as the target audience is people "near" the person being harassed, it's harassment. It's the intent that makes this more of an issue. Intent to harass is not hard to show, most people understand when it's happening.
What I don't get is why was defendant not asked to take down the site and instead just gets huge charges without a chance to "take back". Or at least this is what I'm getting the feeling happened. I'm not really sure if the child or parents were properly asked to take down the page.
Around here: Groceries are already non-taxed and not only is rent/mortgage tax deductible, but I get a credit added to my tax returns for renting. Own a house, get paid $1k. Been renting from the same apartment for 2+ years, get paid $500.
That's the point, Ebola kills itself as long as people die faster than they can come in contact with others. All you need to do is stop people from contacting others for a relatively short time and it fixes itself.
Paying $100 for a nail spa: no problem.
Paying $50 for a doctors visit: Oh the humanity.
It's hard to change the way people think, you're better off just going with the flow. It would be awesome if people were logical, but they are not. And the sooner you understand that, the sooner you can make things better. Letting people mange their own finances for medical is the problem. People are not good at long term decisions. Tax them and make it a universal service. I'm not sure about the exact implementation, but no matter what you do, people will find a way to game the system.
Perfect is the enemy of good. Making the system better should be a higher priority than making it ideologically perfect.
I was also going to say. Why do women get effectively more benefits than men? I am not going to argue against the usefulness, but it is "unfair".
Assuming this is actually good for society by allowing would be mothers to postpone children a bit longer during their peak productive years, then this is an example of "unfair" sexism being good for society. Proving that sexism isn't inherently bad.
Slashdot Mirror
Verizon actually acknowledges that FIOS increase revenue and reduces costs. I'm guessing the problem is running fiber has a 2-3 year break even, which is too long for a public company worried about quarterly returns.
With the strength of five gorillas! But, since you're that strong, if you try to pet a kitten, you'd crush it.
Airbags are for your head, seat belts are for your torso. If you enjoy slamming your head into your steering wheel, go ahead and disable your airbag. Even more fun are videos of an asymmetric head-on collision that favors one side over the other. The test dummies slam their heads into the frame of the car unless you have properly working forward and side airbags.
My ISP ran fiber to every house in the city, customer or not. Cheaper that way. Even customers that are several miles outside the city limits got fiber, all on the ISP's dime, no local, state, or federal government grants or loans. Verizon is just greedy.
Don't sorry, Netflix USA has anime with under 16 girls exposed breasts. Nudity != porn. But you can almost never be too careful.
What are the ages of those two genitalia?
FreeBSD is written and used by Sysadmins. Maybe the Linux people will learn to appreciate good design from the get-go instead of "Lets fork it!". A well designed system should work within the 80/20 rule. A single distro should be used by 80% of the user base, if it not, something is wrong.
"Mainstream" in this context is the average homeuser demographic, not the custom workstation demographic. Show me a popular desktop or laptop computer targeted to parents, grand parents, or gamers that have Linux installed by default.
If it floats, it will be neutral because it will displace as much water equal to its own mass. If it sinks, it will displace less water than equal to its own mass.
I don't have a CS degree, but I have a similar one. When I was a Freshman back around 2004, one of the fist things I learned in 100s level class was how to use parameterized inputs, and how not to designs your SQL queries to be injectable. That information alone could save the industry billions a year. Bad schools or bad programmers, not sure which.
Most trash I know has a grasp on practice, but doesn't understand theory. They have hard time understanding edge cases or scaling. The opposite is knowing theory but no practice, but anyone can get practice. It's hard to get theory self taught, the internet is sparsely populated with good theory and lots of bad ideas. Plenty of code examples.
1) X devs with decades of understanding and benchmarks claim X has horrible bottlenecks that can make Wayland 10x-100x faster for cases that are becoming more common
2) Uecker claims X is fine because he installed X
X is inherently flawed and cannot be fixed without breaking other things. This issue is similar to the IPv4 exhaustion problem. We're hitting limits and there's no way to fix it. People who claim it can be fixed can make the fixes. The X devs are saying X is inherently broken. One of the louder X "haters" has been working on X for over 25 years and has been a senior X programmer for a long time. X is a lost cause when the only people who know how it work are the ones saying it's horrible.
The people who wrote and maintained X for the past 30 years are the ones working on Wayland and they say X is no longer network transparent.
I was under the impression that quantum tunneling more has to do with quantum level stuff having a chance to appear any where in the universe, but has a much higher chance of appearing near its current location. If a location is impossible to get to via classical means, that doesn't stop the fact that the particle may just appear where by chance.
My very layman's understanding that may be quite wrong. Yes? No?
That was not my experience. Had someone harassing my wife. The police told her to lock down her FB account so other people can't see. That stopped the first wave, but then her friends started getting hit with stuff, so my wife would see the posts. Reported it to the police, they forwarded it to FB, posts were pulled hours later.
From what we were told by the police, FB found the real account of the person who was creating fake accounts and warned them to stop or be banned. Problem solved, no judge involved.
The police told us this was pretty standard stuff. Unfortunately, the person harassing my wife was in another state, otherwise they would have been arrested. The officer did call the person, we knew their phone number, and told them any further harassment would result in a warrant for their arrest in our state. Something a person who was a nurse that worked with children would not want. Crazy person I tell ya.
You can't blame the sheeple, you have to blame the Shepard. People are stupid and have no control over what they do, but a person can be held liable.
Even if not libel, it falls under harassment. As long as the target audience is people "near" the person being harassed, it's harassment. It's the intent that makes this more of an issue. Intent to harass is not hard to show, most people understand when it's happening.
What I don't get is why was defendant not asked to take down the site and instead just gets huge charges without a chance to "take back". Or at least this is what I'm getting the feeling happened. I'm not really sure if the child or parents were properly asked to take down the page.
Around here: Groceries are already non-taxed and not only is rent/mortgage tax deductible, but I get a credit added to my tax returns for renting. Own a house, get paid $1k. Been renting from the same apartment for 2+ years, get paid $500.
That's the point, Ebola kills itself as long as people die faster than they can come in contact with others. All you need to do is stop people from contacting others for a relatively short time and it fixes itself.
It uses PHP. People who use PHP don't understand paramterized inputs, they only know about "sanitizing".
Being a "mom" is easy, being a "mother" is a full time job.
Should have told her there's a lot more to being a mother than giving birth. Face time and breast feeding is extremely important for the first year.
Paying $100 for a nail spa: no problem.
Paying $50 for a doctors visit: Oh the humanity.
It's hard to change the way people think, you're better off just going with the flow. It would be awesome if people were logical, but they are not. And the sooner you understand that, the sooner you can make things better. Letting people mange their own finances for medical is the problem. People are not good at long term decisions. Tax them and make it a universal service. I'm not sure about the exact implementation, but no matter what you do, people will find a way to game the system.
Perfect is the enemy of good. Making the system better should be a higher priority than making it ideologically perfect.
I was also going to say. Why do women get effectively more benefits than men? I am not going to argue against the usefulness, but it is "unfair".
Assuming this is actually good for society by allowing would be mothers to postpone children a bit longer during their peak productive years, then this is an example of "unfair" sexism being good for society. Proving that sexism isn't inherently bad.