Slashdot Mirror


Positive Ebola Test In Second Texas Health Worker

mdsolar tips news that a second healthcare worker at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital has tested positive for the Ebola virus. Like the nurse who tested positive a few days ago, this worker was involved in providing care to Eric Duncan, the Liberian man who seems to have brought the virus into the country. The CDC is working to identify further exposures to the local community, though the Times says a second infection among the 70+ medical professionals who were around Duncan is not unexpected. The largest U.S. nurses union says a lack of proper protective gear and constantly changing protocols are to blame for exposures. Meanwhile, the World Health Organization says infection rates in West Africa are such that within a few months, they can expect 10,000 new Ebola cases a week. They also say the death rate for the current outbreak has risen to 70 percent.

463 comments

  1. Just tell me by oodaloop · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will someone just tell me if it's time to panic or not?

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:Just tell me by Soulskill · · Score: 3, Funny

      Reply hazy, try again.

    2. Re:Just tell me by oodaloop · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      O, and frist psotitive!

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    3. Re:Just tell me by Njorthbiatr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only if you need to be treated at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital.

      They've demonstrated themselves to be completely incompetent. Eric Duncan should have been transported to a hospital with the equipment and expertise to deal with quarantining highly infectious disease. The first Ebola case in the US, if you recall, was a doctor admitted to a hospital with staff and facilities prepared to handle it.

    4. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never hurts.

    5. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      *shakes Soulskill*

      Will someone just tell me if it's time to panic or not?

    6. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's always pancake time.

    7. Re:Just tell me by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Not yet.

      Wait for the first one case not related to a previously known case, or the hundredth case, whichever comes first.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    8. Re:Just tell me by gman003 · · Score: 1

      Don't panic.

    9. Re:Just tell me by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Definitely agree with this, there's no excuse to have been as ignorant and unprepared as this particular hospital has proven to be. A statement from the first case said that nurses got no training on ebola until quite a while after the patient had been admitted. You'd think that any hospital in a first world country would be going "there's lots of travel, we may get a case, here's a basic set of guidelines to handle a suspected ebola patient" at a minimum. Especially after the CDC had already sent out notices to do so.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    10. Re:Just tell me by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      We'll know whether to panic when that 21-day quarantine period is up. Unless the CDC is wrong about that period also.

    11. Re:Just tell me by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Will someone just tell me if it's time to panic or not?

      No, the conditions in that hospital were shockingly lax. From what I've been reading the hospital administration should be brought up on charges. At the very least that infected nurse should sue the pants off them. Notice that none of the people he was staying with caught it. You can only catch it by ingesting another persons bodily fluids. This disease prays on your concern for the sick. Those that care for the diseased are the ones at risk. As they get sicker and sicker, people deal with the mess and viola... If the hospital had even remotely followed proper procedures everyone would have been fine.

      On the bright side, we have a drug that appears to work. There have not been clinical trials as of yet, but PBS had special on it over the weekend that most researchers seem to think that the mechanism is simple enough that they think it should "Just work" anyway. It's very hard for them to produce though. Extremely labor intensive. They literally have to inject virus into tobacco plants, wait days/weeks then extract the drug from them. But, on the bright side, they said that once a persons been inoculated their body will produce the antibodies on its own, so they can provide transfusions to others infected as long as the blood types a match. So it appears we may have this licked. Even if we only have enough drug to treat a few thousand people, they can give transfusions to others who can give them to even more people and so-on.

      If it turns into a real mess, all it would take is Rich people fearing for their own lives to put up the money to start mass producing this drug. Also, it appears the Russians have a few drugs starting trails as well.

    12. Re:Just tell me by jansifae · · Score: 1

      Are we still at "Go get a helmet" or have we graduated to "Put on the damn helmet"?

    13. Re:Just tell me by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2, Informative

      So far we have a small handful of US infections - mostly related to one guy who brought it in the country and the healthcare workers who didn't follow appropriate protocols while working with him. (Some of that blame might lie on the CDC and the hospital's management - not all of it on the nurses.)

      Contrast this with the 5% - 20% of people in the US who get the flu every year and the 200,000 who are hospitalized with flu-related complications. (Source) If you are panicked about Ebola then you should be running down the street screaming about the flu. (Hopefully running down the street to get your flu shot.)

      This isn't to say that Ebola isn't serious. Anyone who has traveled to the countries affected and gets a fever should be treated with extreme care. Anyone who was around someone like this should be suspected of having contracted Ebola and should watch for the symptoms. Be wary if you are in these situations, but otherwise it isn't panic-time despite the continuous "WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE"-style reporting the media is giving Ebola.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    14. Re:Just tell me by Wycliffe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You haven't been to a hospital recently have you? Doctors aren't like Dr. House. They aren't looking for
      zebras when 99.99% of their patients are horses. If you come in with a rare disease it can sometimes
      take years to get a proper diagnosis. Also most hospitals in the US are private and understaffed so
      taking time out to train everybody in every hospital to look for ebola and how to treat it is just not going
      to happen as that would hurt their bottom line. That's assuming that a hospital even has someone on
      staff that is qualified to do the training which I assume most hospitals don't. What really needs to
      happen is the CDC needs to train 10 people and have those 10 people train 10 people, etc...
      Let's say you are REALLY FAST and can keep doing this on a 3 day schedule, that means that it would
      take 9 days to train 1000 people, 12 days to train 10000 people, etc.... IF you can keep up this
      extremely tight schedule it would take over 21 days to train all the health care workers in the US.
      That's assuming that the person 3 levels deep is actually trained well enough in 3 days to teach it
      to the next level. Good luck with that.

    15. Re:Just tell me by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

      So far we have a small handful of US infections - mostly related to one guy who brought it in the country and the healthcare workers who didn't follow appropriate protocols while working with him. (Some of that blame might lie on the CDC and the hospital's management - not all of it on the nurses.)

      Contrast this with the 5% - 20% of people in the US who get the flu every year and the 200,000 who are hospitalized with flu-related complications. (Source)

      Can we please stop comparing Ebola to the flu?

      For starters, Ebola apparently has a 70% mortality rate. Additionally, Ebola kills people who are otherwise perfectly healthy. The flu does not.

      The flu is a health concern, yes, but widespread infection of Ebola is a nightmare that would make (in Sierra Leone, "makes") most years' flu seasons look like a sneezing fit.

      --
      blog
    16. Re:Just tell me by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      This is the problem with our news delivery system.
      We get information in real time... However we rarely ever get quality information, and digging to get the quality information is very difficult.

      So they are 2 people in the US known to be sick from this, there is a containment policy that is improving. There are 300,000,000 million people in the US.
      Yes it is scary, because if you get it there is a high mortality rate, and it does spread fairly easily.
      But it doesn't spread like the flu. And thousands of Americans die yearly from the Flu.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    17. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem was when they first started flying patients home, and then subsequently allowing flights to continue from those places.

      There is an active epidemic, and apparently the border people are just saying "oh, cool, just been back helping Ebola victims? Come on in!!"

      Everything about how this is being handled just screams incompetence.

    18. Re:Just tell me by ATMAvatar · · Score: 2

      If you are panicked about Ebola then you should be running down the street screaming about the flu. (Hopefully running down the street to get your flu shot.)

      I see you are new to this planet. Let me help you. Humans do not panic over the things most likely to kill them (heart disease, cancer, etc.). They panic over the things least likely to kill them (ebola, terrorism, sharks in tornadoes, etc.).

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    19. Re:Just tell me by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      For starters, Ebola apparently has a 70% mortality rate. Additionally, Ebola kills people who are otherwise perfectly healthy. The flu does not.

      The flu kills tens of thousands of people every year. Ebola has so far infected two, and that was at a point where nobody knew how to handle it - today these two wouldn't have been infected.

    20. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will someone just tell me if it's time to panic or not?

      Throw a coin, if it's heads panic, tails go about your life normally.

    21. Re:Just tell me by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Just keep your towel handy. Oh, and don't let recent visitors to Africa dry their hands with it!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    22. Re:Just tell me by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Only if you need to be treated at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital.

      They've demonstrated themselves to be completely incompetent. Eric Duncan should have been transported to a hospital with the equipment and expertise to deal with quarantining highly infectious disease.

      In case anyone doubts this: ratio of "normal" patients vs. infected healthworkers
      third world: ~ 10:1
      Texas: 1:2

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    23. Re:Just tell me by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite sure about the timeline...wasn't it at the beginning like "Were you in contact with anyone with Ebola?" - "No." - "Ok, it's flu, then." ? I'm not really sure you can run a full battery of tests on anyone just in case - especially in the US health care $y$tem. There's the whole diminishing returns thingy. He's the one to blame, but you can't prosecute dead people. (Well, not anymore. ;-))

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    24. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we still at "Go get a helmet" or have we graduated to "Put on the damn helmet"?

      I think "get into the trench and put a tin foil hat on" better describes the situation.

    25. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yup. We've had like 10 hospitals in the U.S. and E.U. treat cases. It's only Texas and Spain that managed to fuck up hospital procedures so badly that folks got sick. And the Spanish cases were so sick they were basically dead when they got there.

      I donno if it's just this Hospital though. Texas has quite the good ol boy network that results in incompetent people being hired for managerial positions routinely. Just consider Bush 2.0's political appointments for example.

    26. Re:Just tell me by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      So don't ever again go to a hospital. Because they are again becoming the places of death.

      Right?

      Well, something to think about. That elective procedure you were thinking of having done during Spring Break or Summer vacation? It might be wise to reschedule it for the upcoming December break, before ebola makes things crazy busy at the hospital.

      There is currently no effective test to tell whether a person's presenting symptoms are from ebola or from the flu. None seem likely in the near future. That means a lot of persons are going to be quarantined during the next flu season. Including-- most especially including-- hospital staff who may have unwittingly come into contact with ebola. Or maybe the flu shot just didn't work for them. Who can tell? How much risk is the hospital going take, and when will high absenteeism become the norm as staff make their own decisions about level of risk?

      I'm not a conspiracy theory kind of guy. I enjoyed the movie, but I think that conspiracy theorists do not have all their oars in the water. Yet if any movie writer set out to design a disease that would break hospitals and healthcare systems, it would probably look a lot like ebola.

      --
      Will
    27. Re:Just tell me by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's called 20/20 hindsight, Mr. Armchair Surgeon General. Had you been there, with a patient with the symptoms of some viral infection, I'd have liked to see you saying "of course it's Ebola!", when in reality, there are dozens of alternative diagnoses, many of them much more likely.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    28. Re:Just tell me by Slim_Jack · · Score: 1

      From reading the New York Times article, apparently Duncan was subject to a 'CT scan' - an extremely expensive diagnosic procedure. Our healthcare system is economically screwed up beyond comprehension, and Obamacare did absolutely nothing to adjust economic and outcome decisions for the better, just piled on more incentive to perform more needless and expensive testing. In one way it is good for America that it did not have any expensive ZMapp drug when Duncan came along -- if they would have saved him then how many more people would be sneaking through the border from Africa to get the extremely expensive treatment at American expense, ignoring the spreading of the disease to other people?

    29. Re:Just tell me by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      They aren't looking for zebras when 99.99% of their patients are horses. If you come in with a rare disease it can sometimes take years to get a proper diagnosis.

      The words "specificity and sensitivity" immediately jump to my mind. ;-) Diagnosing a rare disease with non-specific symptoms? Good luck with that!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    30. Re:Just tell me by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      As they get sicker and sicker, people deal with the mess and viola...

      And it's fricking hard to properly play a viola with latex gloves. Thus, contagion!

    31. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diagnosing a rare disease with non-specific symptoms?

      Yeah, ebola is basically the flu, but just before you're about to die you start bleeding out all your orifices.

    32. Re:Just tell me by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 2

      >For starters, Ebola apparently has a 70% mortality rate. Additionally, Ebola kills people who are otherwise perfectly healthy. The flu does not.

      True for some flu variants, false for others. A bad flu is much more dangerous than Ebola, and absolutely kills healthy people in their prime.

    33. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Japanese Administators had been found to be so absolutely inept [to a degree that it seems likely they have done this purposely], they would be forced to commit hari cari. There would be at least some satisfaction in that.

    34. Re:Just tell me by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      We're terrible at assessing risk, but we excel at panicking.

    35. Re:Just tell me by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      CT scans shouldn't be "extremely expensive" (around where I live, it's on the order of $100), but with flu-like symptoms, I'd certainly like to know the rationale for their application.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    36. Re:Just tell me by ledow · · Score: 1

      Of you have to ask others if it's time to panic, then it's not.

      P.S. Even if others say it IS time to panic, expand your definition of "others" carefully. I have been variously told that I have swine flu, that eggs are killer-bacteria in a shell, that bird flu is going to wipe us all out, the seas are rising, the sky is falling, etc. etc. etc.

      If you have to ask, it's not important. If you have to choose who you ask to get the answer you want, it's even less important.

    37. Re:Just tell me by ledow · · Score: 1

      In comparison, a spike through the head is probably MORE common and almost certainly more deadly. Should we be avoiding anything spiky at all whatsoever? No. Just be careful around spiky things.

    38. Re:Just tell me by cats-paw · · Score: 1

      This disease prays on your concern for the sick.

      Well it might prey on your concern, but it doesn't even do that.

      It just does what it does.

      You make some very serious allegations about the hospital administration and their culpability, got any proof about that ?

      Were the nurses really so stupid that they were not interested in doing everything they should to protect themselves while treating this person ? I find it hard to believe that things were that lax. I expect the real problem is, as you say, the disease is just incredibily communicable, and the nurses were unfortunately part of the learning curve in dealing with it.

      The truly incompetent were the individuals who had a patient who told them he had been to west Africa and was feeling sick, and sent him home.
      That took some real density.

      Too bad they don't believe in science in Texas.

      --
      Absolute statements are never true
    39. Re:Just tell me by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      You haven't been to a hospital recently have you? Doctors aren't like Dr. House. They aren't looking for zebras when 99.99% of their patients are horses. If you come in with a rare disease it can sometimes take years to get a proper diagnosis.

      And yet they ask anyone but the African guy if they have been to other countries recently.

      Not to mention that they hand out antibiotics like candy to people with unspecified symptoms - and then send them home. Understandable, because they can't keep him in emergency for ever, and there are no known problems with the overuse of the new Aspirin (facepalm).

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    40. Re:Just tell me by epyx · · Score: 1

      Headache - I kid you not. Every. Single. patient that mentions they have a headache will get an MRI or CT scan in case they're bleeding into their brain.

    41. Re:Just tell me by Slim_Jack · · Score: 1

      What country do you live in?

    42. Re:Just tell me by ray-auch · · Score: 1

      The rationale was probably to rack up charges, if the machine was not in use at the time, might as well use it.

      CT _scanners_ of course are pretty expensive, be interesting to know how they decontaminated it, if they did.

    43. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But you have to understand, how could the hospital make any money if they didn't send dozens of people into the patients room to all charge for 5 minutes of time (rounded up to the nearest whole day)? Look at any of the articles about "surprise hospital charges" to see that this is a real thing. So of course there are more infected staff per patient, the patient probably had 20-30 different people in their room on any given day.

    44. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it turns into a real mess, all it would take is Rich people fearing for their own lives to put up the money to start mass producing this drug. Also, it appears the Russians have a few drugs starting trails as well.

      Why contain it? Let it spill over into the schools and churches, let the bodies pile up in the streets. In the end, they'll beg us to save them.

    45. Re:Just tell me by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      That's called 20/20 hindsight, Mr. Armchair Surgeon General. Had you been there, with a patient with the symptoms of some viral infection, I'd have liked to see you saying "of course it's Ebola!", when in reality, there are dozens of alternative diagnoses, many of them much more likely.

      Yeah, why should a doctor suspect Ebola in an African patient, when at the same time whole planes went into full panic when somebody coughed.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    46. Re:Just tell me by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      "I've come from Liberia and I feel sick"

      Did you need to hear anything more than that one line given the news in the last 4 or so months?

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    47. Re:Just tell me by JeffAtl · · Score: 1

      This seems to be a case of the hospital taking on a "anything that can be done other states can be done better in Texas".

      Officials now admit that the original patient should have been transferred to either Emory University Hospital in Atlanta or Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha.

      It's not clear why the hospital was insistent on treating a disease that it had no expertise with.

    48. Re:Just tell me by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      You can only catch it by ingesting another persons bodily fluids

      Let me translate that into real-world terms. Do NOT rub your eyes, nose, or mouth with the hand/s that have come in contact with Ebola infected bodily fluids.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    49. Re:Just tell me by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Contrast this with the 5% - 20% of people in the US who get the flu every year and the 200,000 who are hospitalized with flu-related complications.

      I don't understand this "Oh, if you are scared of ebola, why aren't you scared of [insert other ailment that kills $bignum people each year]?" logic. Everyone knows that heart disease and cancer and falling off a ladder kill more Americans than ebola right now. So what?

      Right now, ebola is not a serious threat to western countries because: 1. It is not airborne (if someone sneezes across the room, you're not gonna get ebola from it), 2. it is not communicable except when the infected is suffering from symptoms, and the symptoms are so severe that the infected person will land in a hospital very quickly, away from the general populace, and 3. we (supposedly) have protocols in place to prevent an infected person from infecting others once he his hospitalized. Obviously, #3 needs some refinement, but I think we'll see that soon.

      The reason that ebola is so scary is that if it mutates to become airborne, it is going to become really, really hard to control. As in, you could get ebola just as easily as you could get the flu. And it's currently spreading like wildfire in West Africa, and in that environment, the virus could make that mutation! That is why we need to get really serious about ebola, really quickly. Not because of what ebola is right now, but because of how deadly it might become.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    50. Re:Just tell me by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Well, I will definitely disagree with you. Transporting the patient certainly entails risks, it's not a freebee. Yes, Texas Presbyterian was not particularly prepared but they were dealing with patient zero as far a de novo infections are concerned. It turns out to be non trivial to keep full protections up, technique is very, very important. Therefore, it's not surprising that folks on the bleeding edge of the problem might bleed a bit.

      Now, if we have the same problem in a couple of months, then we have issues. That would say that either health care workers are untrainable or there is something in the biology that we don't understand.

      Be very sure that health care workers around the work are busily studying the CDC guidelines and protocols and this time, they might actually learn them.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    51. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Total mortality vs mortality rate. Catching influenza as a health adult or health child you have a very, very small chance of dying. Whereas with Ebola the odds are very much against you. The CDC care worker decontamination procedures appear to be lax. It could be the nurse who cared for Duncan followed the CDC procedures and still caught Ebola. We don't know though. http://minx.cc:1080/?post=352452

    52. Re:Just tell me by AdrienCo · · Score: 1

      harakiri

    53. Re:Just tell me by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 2

      Hold on to that optimistic viewpoint as long as you can. We do not need to incite panic here.

      But recognize that the ebola death curve is exponential. Production and distribution of vaccines, and of antibodies by transfusion, is at best geometric, and more likely linear.

      It will likely be possible to provide immunity to select communities of several hundred thousand souls. But there are more than seven billion humans on this planet and the math for a good general solution to ebola just will not pencil out. Unless there is some miraculous breakthrough in some medical laboratory in the next three or four months, ebola is going to have a global impact: short of carpet bombing a big chunk of west Africa with nukes it will probably get loose. And the impact of an ebola pandemic will ripple through your neighborhood, even if your city is immunized and the nearest case is several thousand miles away.

      This is not panic mongering. But this is a fast moving disease, and some of the persons who read slashdot need to be aware of its realities and we cannot afford to let them live in a fairy tale world. These are the forward-thinkers who can find ways to help us soldier on to what may be a post apocalyptic world.

      At this point the question for these persons is not whether ebola is going to affect your personal life. The questions are how might it affect you, personally, and what could you start doing soon to mitigate that impact? Because saving as much of your own future as is possible is likely going to improve every other survivor's future as well. It's kind of a FOSS-like thing.

      --
      Will
    54. Re:Just tell me by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      When in trouble,
      Or in doubt.
      Run in circles,
      Scream and shout.

      -- Heinlein

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    55. Re:Just tell me by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      A) I don't disagree with your training statements. I agree the CDC has not handled this the way it should have.

      B) When you have been notified about ebola and specific countries, and are in health care, it behooves you to at least learn something about it. That's the difference between having a "job" and a "career". Apparently this knowledge is no longer being taught, that in a career you keep learning and need to stay up to date.

      Then when you get a patient like Duncan, you at least realize that he might have ebola and that this means you better refresh your procedures since a good number of health workers in the affected countries have been infected and died from treating patients with this disease. One of the more telling quotes from one of the interviews with staff at this hospital was that they "didn't have protocols on how to deal with the deadly virus" You can also tell by the Nurses national union rep confirming that it appears these protocols are lacking in the entire country. This is obviously not true, as there are at least 4 hospitals as designated by the CDC that are ready for these cases. The CDC problem is they should have quarantined and moved the patients to one of these ready and qualified hospitals instead of letting unprepared institutions attempt to get up to speed while under fire. Having a checklist handed to you to follow while under the gun is bound to have lapses compared to people that train under those checklists. But, we could go on and on about failures in hindsight and lay blame all around, but these initial steps would have significantly reduced risk with little effort.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    56. Re:Just tell me by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      What is your chance of catching Ebola versus your chance of catching the flu? As it stands now, unless you were in that Texas hospital around the same time as the Ebola patient was, you have a much higher chance of catching the flu tomorrow than you have of catching Ebola. Media scare reports aside, I don't think Ebola is at the panic level yet. Cautiously aware, yes, but not panic.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    57. Re:Just tell me by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Oh good. Someone else caught that too. :^)

      And imagine playing it while your fingernails bleed.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    58. Re:Just tell me by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Sadly, that studying is happening too late for some. Even if these 2 survive, it will be an unpleasant few months.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    59. Re:Just tell me by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

      When I was in University I had a parking spot such that I could walk through a hospital for quite a distance on the way to my classes. It seemed everyone who parked there would do that because when it's -20 Celsius or below (-4 F and below) you can get pretty cold walking outside in the wind. I walked outside. Why expose yourself to that crap day after day? Eventually you'll catch something, hopefully nothing more serious than the flu but who knows. I only got a bit cold.

    60. Re:Just tell me by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

      As they get sicker and sicker, people deal with the mess and viola...

      Depends on what you play. I've heard many an upbeat tune played on the viola. If you're into somber melodies it's better to get an Irish band.

    61. Re:Just tell me by Iniamyen · · Score: 1

      I'm not speaking as a nurse, but from what I understand, it's tough to have that attitude towards your "career" when you don't get paid what you deserve, and your job is more about dealing with the fact that your employer wants to be as cheap as possible in every regard, rather than providing care to patients. Honestly, I think a major outbreak in the US would be a good thing because it might make people think more about the value that they assign to the people actually doing most of the work caring for them when they go to the doctor's office.

    62. Re:Just tell me by rjstegbauer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Re: Diagnosing a rare disease with non-specific symptoms

      Except for that one very specific symptom of traveling to Western Africa! That should be a bright red flag!

    63. Re:Just tell me by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      Virus mutations aren't my specialty but from what I've read Ebola mutating to become airborne isn't a high probability. "Airborne Ebola" stories seem to crop up on conspiracy theory sites (e.g. "The CDC is lying to us and Ebola really spreads via air... WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!") and media outlets that want to scare their viewers/readers ("Next up: Celebrity Doctor X tells us how Ebola becoming airborne will make it THE WORST PLAGUE MANKIND HAS EVER SEEN!!!").

      Caution is certainly warranted. If you are a health care worker and someone who recently was in Liberia comes in with a fever, contain them ASAP. Assume they have Ebola and take appropriate precautions. If they turn out not to have Ebola, fine. If they do, your quick actions could save your life as the lives of everyone around the infected person. However, if you are Random Joe Citizen walking down the street, don't panic that the person who just bumped into you has given you the Ebola.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    64. Re:Just tell me by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      I believe that here in the UK, the official procedure is to put a brown paper bag over your head, as it makes it so much easier to clean up the mess afterwards.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    65. Re:Just tell me by flink · · Score: 3, Informative

      Can we please stop comparing Ebola to the flu?

      For starters, Ebola apparently has a 70% mortality rate. Additionally, Ebola kills people who are otherwise perfectly healthy. The flu does not.

      Some flus are absolutely more deadly for healthy people. Part of what made the 1918 flu pandemic so deadly was that it could induce a cytokine storm resulting in multiple organ failure. Since the release of cytokines is an inflammatory immune response, the better your immune system the worse off you are. Thus a young, fit person with a healthy immune system is more at risk than an infant with a undeveloped immune system, or an elderly person with a failing one.

    66. Re:Just tell me by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      This disease prays on

      Yet another reason to be down on religion, if even Ebola is praying....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    67. Re:Just tell me by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that just about everyone who is up to speed on Ebola is in West Africa or shining some seat in Washington D.C. with their ass.

      When you have the President and the CDC claiming on National Television that it is highly unlikely that Ebola will come to the U.S., how can you fault hospitals for not spending the time and money to train large numbers of people and purchasing expensive equipment, reconfiguring valuable floor space, upgrade airs systems, etc?

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    68. Re:Just tell me by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1, Informative

      You fail statistics and understanding. First of all, the ratio of patients to health care workers is very different (read: Texas has a higher ratio). Second, you need to understand sample size before you start drawing conclusions.

    69. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Panic? I'm going golfing. Worst case scenario, they've been educated regarding Obola.

    70. Re:Just tell me by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      sharks in tornadoes

      Are you suggesting that sharks in tornados are not a serious threat?

      Even in Texas?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    71. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Total mortality vs mortality rate.

      Total mortality rate fucking matters and determines how irrational you're being when you're panicking about absolutely nothing. These idiots panicking about Ebola should never get into a car again.

    72. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the gruesome, quick, unexpected factor. Terrorist chops off your head? Unless you're in the Middle East, that's kind of unexpected, gruesome, and quick. A heart attack isn't unexpected for most who suffer heart disease (lifestyle/diet is a known), and it's not particularly gruesome.

    73. Re:Just tell me by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except for that one very specific symptom of traveling to Western Africa! ... for now.

      FTFY

      We're working really hard to make sure that Ebola isn't the racist disease it is now. You see, being insensitive to one's place of birth is RACIST. Even the relatives of the dead guy are claiming RACISM at the Dallas hospital is why he died. So, we're focusing on useless measures just so we remain PC.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    74. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing You don't work in medicine. Testing for Ebola is not done like it is in medical dramas, complete with vagueness and suspense. If Someone shows up with a certain number of symptoms, the "worst case scenario" diagnosis is tested first to get it out of the proverbial way. A disease like Ebola easily reaches the top tier of "worst case scenarios" and is screened for first. Screen for Ebola often involves checking not just for fever but also if the Patient has come in contact with known Ebola Patients, followed by fluid tests which are performed by laboratory Technicians using an automated process. The keyword being "automated". The bare minimum training needed for such Technicians can be imparted in a matter of hours, not days.

    75. Re:Just tell me by gcmd · · Score: 1

      Gotta love Ron White. We are definitely still at the "Go get a helmet" stage, though a tyvek suit might be better idea :-)

    76. Re:Just tell me by gcmd · · Score: 1

      Oh my God, I've been attacked by a shark in a tornado. And Elvis was riding the shark!

    77. Re:Just tell me by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know about that. Everyone in the West is constantly brainwashed into the idea that they can get this stuff for free and that they should get it for free and that it should be some kind of "right" like the right to a trial by jury.

      People are used to not directly paying for this stuff. Americans are certainly inclined to devalue any free product or service. People in general seem to devalue everyone else's profession and get huffy when you actually expect them to pay.

      Paying $100 for a nail spa: no problem.

      Paying $50 for a doctors visit: Oh the humanity.

      Doctors and nurses need to stop being lumped in with free government cheese before there is any hope that the general public will cherish them.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    78. Re:Just tell me by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Ever play the Telephone game?

      Being Trained, and being Trained-to-Train are two different things.

    79. Re:Just tell me by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Will someone just tell me if it's time to panic or not?

      That depends. Are you bleeding through every orifice yet or not?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    80. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't just such a mutation already happen in a different strain that infected a bunch of chimps in a research lab in the 70's? If this thing reproduces so prolifically in its host already and this mutation has already happened, it's not irrational to worry it might happen again.

    81. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been variously told that I have swine flu, that eggs are killer-bacteria in a shell, that bird flu is going to wipe us all out, the seas are rising, the sky is falling, etc. etc. etc.

      Yes, only one of those is true.

    82. Re:Just tell me by Wycliffe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's already a well known fact that many important professions like teachers, police officers, nurses, firefighters, paramedics, etc...
      are not paid very well compared to how much they are needed but what's scary is how few there are. We have decent health care
      in the USA but it would take very little to overwhelm them. Most cities have only 1 ambulance per 30000 people. It only takes a
      very tiny disaster to deplete them. Heck, it doesn't even take a real disaster. Listening to the police scanner in my city, it's fairly
      common to hear "status 0" which means that every available ambulance is already on a call. And forget worrying about isolation
      rooms, in the USA we only have 3 hospital beds per 1000 people. Isolation rooms are several orders of magnitude smaller than
      that as is proper equipment. We are completely unprepared for any type of mass illness.

    83. Re:Just tell me by nblender · · Score: 1

      I know many people who have caught the flu. In fact, all of my co-workers. I don't know anyone who has died of the flu.

      I don't know anyone who has died of Ebola. But I also don't know anyone who has caught it.

      I'd rather not catch either but if I had to catch one of them, guess which one I'd rather have?

    84. Re:Just tell me by Kjella · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, all the persons infected so far were people with known risk factors for ebola like travelling to ebola country or treating an ebola patient. Assume for a moment that one of these people managed to infect someone random. Are the symptoms going to get bad enough quickly enough that you get flagged as an ebola patient before you've had the chance to infect other people? My usual expectation would be like:

      1. You're feeling a bit under the weather, but go to work away.
      2. You feel rather crap with feber and a headache, the doctor says to stay in bed.
      3. You're really not getting better, doctor runs tests and schedules you for a trip to the hospital.
      4. You finally get into the hospital in the "normal" ward, they find out what you got.
      5. Shit hits the fan and they try finding everyone you've been in contact with in steps 1-4.

      If your average patient manages to infect >1.1 new patients before you can put a stop to it, you have a problem.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    85. Re:Just tell me by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Can someone tell me why so many talking heads are saying "It would be a BAD thing to stop allowing any normal commercial flights INTO the US from that part of Africa till they get it under control?

      I mean, special permission flights for health workers, aid, etc could be set up for private charter flights as needed, but why are we allowing people from the infected countries to freely come and go in the US?

      We're clearly not THAT ready in the US to handle this disease and it seems common sense to isolate that part of the world from general travel till things get under control.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    86. Re:Just tell me by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      Sneaking across the USA-Africa border requires a very strong swimmer.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    87. Re:Just tell me by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      Virus mutations aren't my specialty but from what I've read Ebola mutating to become airborne isn't a high probability.

      It will become higher with each flu season this outbreak is not contained, as some patients will have co-infections with influenza each seaon, allowing LGT to do its magic more often, making it more probable.

      --
      That is all.
    88. Re:Just tell me by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Let me translate that into real-world terms. Do NOT rub your eyes, nose, or mouth with the hand/s that have come in contact with Ebola infected bodily fluids.

      Actually, that's common advice good for flu as well (flu season's coming!).

      Anyhow, the issue is that taking off PPE is actually the hardest part of the job - do it wrong and you've just nullified the entire reason for using PPE to begin with. It's a very careful dance of managing contaminated and non-contaminated surfaces, and screw it up and you're hosed.

      (E.g., when removing gloves, the gloved hand should pinch the palm of the glove of the other hand (contaminated-contaminated contact) then use that as leverage to remove the glove. But now to remove the other glove, the exposed hand (which cannot touch anything contaminated! not even to run it against something!) must dig under the cuff the glove where it's uncontaminated and remove the glove that way. yeah, do you decontaminate your hands again to be sure, but still).

      Now you have two uncontaminated hands, and need to remove your goggles and mask and hood by doing it from the back (less contamination, hopefully), and removing your suit requires touching the inside of the suit and pulling it off - you can't undo the zipper (contaminated).

      Just one mis-step and you're hosed.

    89. Re:Just tell me by fightinfilipino · · Score: 4, Interesting

      simple. because those persons can go to a third country and then travel from there. it creates an impetus for persons from West Africa to simply try to evade such controls. this would of course worsen the situation, not improve it.

      the world as a whole needs to be sending more resources to West Africa to fight the epidemic *there*. that is the only thing that will help stop this from becoming an actual pandemic.

    90. Re:Just tell me by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Seems that there was a breach in protocol at the hospital and that is likey to result in a fatality, so OSHA can give them a verbal warning, a written warning, a $5000.00 fine or a $250,000 fine. Even a Private for profit Hospital is going to take notice of a quarter million dollar fine.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    91. Re:Just tell me by halcyononandon · · Score: 1

      Uh yeah, maybe if you totally disregard the fact that HE JUST FLEW IN FROM LIBERIA.

    92. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Brazilians handled a suspect case quite well in the last few days. And it did not surface in one of the big cities like São Paulo or Rio, but in a small backwater town called Cascavel, near the borders with Argentina and Paraguay. With all the media hype surrounding the big fat virus from Africa, the doctors were quick to arrive at the suspicion of Ebola once they knew they had a patient who had been to Africa and displayed a certain set of symptoms.

    93. Re:Just tell me by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      It's easier to monitor someone if you know they came from {$infected area} than if they had to take steps to conceal the fact because they were desperate to come home (or, you know, leave a disease-ridden hellhole.)

      It might be better to simply bite the bullet, acknowledge that there is Ebola in Texas, and after giving non-residents a chance to leave, simple seal up Texas and route all flights to and from infected areas to that state.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    94. Re:Just tell me by NetNed · · Score: 2

      Yes because seeing a person that has the symptoms and knowing he recently returned from a country with an outbreak can the YEARS to diagnosis. I mean who has time for all that?

    95. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seppuku

    96. Re:Just tell me by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Hospitals have always been places of death. People have just been able to successfully kid themselves in the last few decades. It's basic logic. You take everyone with any kind of medical problem and concentrate them in one location.

      Even with diligent medical practices, they are bound to be breeding grounds and exchange points for all kinds of nasty things.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    97. Re:Just tell me by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      The beautiful thing will be if a vaccine is produced.......watching the cognitive dissonance in all those anti-vaxers who also are posting hysterical things about ebola. Will they risk the autism?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    98. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem here is that universal precautions should have been in place regardless, which should have been effective for ebola as well.

      And if you are wondering if this is the case, let me introduce you to the rates of nosocomial infections US hospitals have.

      The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated roughly 1.7 million hospital-associated infections, from all types of bacteria combined, cause or contribute to 99,000 deaths each year.[21] Other estimates indicate 10%, or 2 million, patients a year become infected, with the annual cost ranging from $4.5 billion to $11 billion. In the USA, the most frequent type of infection hospitalwide is urinary tract infection (36%), followed by surgical site infection (20%), and bloodstream infection and pneumonia (both 11%).

      Most healthcare settings are purposely understaffed, lack proper safety equipment, and staff are taxed beyond their training. The only difference being the stakes have never been as high as with ebola, and without the attention as to how hospitals actually run.

    99. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't tell if you are joking. The hospital's failure is very clear, even from a statistics standpoint. If we assume the real infection rate of hospital workers is something low like 10% then what are the odds that the hospital was merely unlucky in this one isolated instance and *two* people were infected? Don't worry, we'll wait. Use your toes if you have to.

    100. Re:Just tell me by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Total mortality VS mortality rate. The mortality rate for the flu is very low. Even with 100,000 infected you might only get a couple of thousand dead. With 100,000 people infected with ebola you're likely to see 50,000 - 70,000 deaths.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    101. Re:Just tell me by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

      Has Madagascar closed their borders? It's not a pandemic until then.

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    102. Re:Just tell me by sumdumass · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is. And yes I'm being serious.

      Amber Joy Vinson after knowing of her exposure to an Ebola patient who died from the disease, decided with her vast knowlege of healthcare issues that it was prudent to travel to cleavland ohio on a commercial airliner and return to Texas hours before reporting her symptoms on the same type of travel.

      When the healthcare workers decide to move about and interact with the public- crossing state lines- after knowing other healthcare workers with the same patient contracted the disease, you should be very concerned and panic. The CDC, who makes brown and the Katrina response by FEMA look like a perfectly executed plan, has failed in providing guidence competent enough that someone potentially exposed figured what the hell, lets travel within the incubation period. We are all going to get screwed in this.

      Some people think it ids government trying to be too politically correct. I think it is either incompetance or intentional. I'm reminded of an interview on PBS where Ted Turner was asked about his over population stance that he and many greenies take. He said you can kill people and you cannot sterilize them so you have to educate people. He said eventually mother nature will catch up and solve the problrm. Except if a disease kills people, it is the natural way and all fits in. I think people in positions of power may qant this to spread in order to thin the herd out. This will lower carbon use and solve the so called population problem.

      Thats right, i think this is intentional and by design. The lack of the most simple common sense protections points to this.

    103. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of you have to ask others if it's time to panic, then it's not.

      P.S. Even if others say it IS time to panic, expand your definition of "others" carefully. I have been variously told that I have swine flu, that eggs are killer-bacteria in a shell, that bird flu is going to wipe us all out, the seas are rising, the sky is falling, etc. etc. etc.

      If you have to ask, it's not important. If you have to choose who you ask to get the answer you want, it's even less important.

      Well, FWIW, the seas ARE rising - though (currently) slow enough that they're unlikely to cause major issues during your (expected) lifetime.

    104. Re:Just tell me by fhage · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You can only catch it by ingesting another persons bodily fluids

      Let me translate that into real-world terms. Do NOT rub your eyes, nose, or mouth with the hand/s that have come in contact with Ebola infected bodily fluids.

      While that's good advice, it's not completely correct. One does not have to "self-contaminate" to catch Ebola. Lab tests show a single droplet landing on your eye can cause an infection. It is well known that standard surgical masks, eye protection, gowns and gloves do not prevent transfer of Ebola from patients to their caregivers. The CDC techs working with Ebola use full containment suits with positive pressure ventilation and high performance respirators. They get 2 days of hand on-training on protocol. Reports in the MSM say the nurses infected in Tx were given a 20 minute training video and only gowns, shoe booties, gloves and a face shield. It's very possible that the infected Tx nurses didn't self-contaminate.

      In addition, there's documented evidence of non-contact transmission between animals and primates. See http://healthmap.org/site/dise... The Ebola infection rate was 100% of the monkeys kept in the same room with infected pigs. There were no opportunities for direct contact between animals. There definitely are vectors for transmission of Ebola without any direct contact with bodily fluids.

    105. Re:Just tell me by Tuidjy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Too late. The second infected nurse flew from Ohio to Texas, while symptomatic. Which means that the infection could, theoretically, have been spread in both Ohio, and wherever her co-passengers went.

      Forget quarantining areas. I think efforts should be focused on
      - educating citizens on measures to reduce chances of exposure (hygiene)
      - training medical personnel (the infected nurses are a disgrace to their hospital's procedures)
      - purchasing equipment to deal with Ebola (better suits, gloves, etc...)

      But hey, I'm just an engineer. I do not have constituents to please so that I keep my cushy job where I can trade the common good for personal perks. So if any of the above gets implemented, it will be later, as opposed two weeks ago.

      As for panicking? There's never a time to panic. There is a time to punish the guilty, after the emergency has been dealt with. They can panic them, if they wish.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    106. Re:Just tell me by hankwang · · Score: 1

      "the ebola death curve is exponential. Production and distribution of vaccines, and of antibodies by transfusion, is at best geometric."

      Geometric is essentially the same as exponential. The only difference is that geometric is in discrete steps and exponential can also describe fractional steps. So, what did you really mean here?

    107. Re:Just tell me by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I think you mean seppuku

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    108. Re:Just tell me by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The flu is an infection, you don't get it from low temperatures you get it from a virus, the best way to keep from getting keep from getting infected by the virus is to wash your hands for 30 seconds.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    109. Re:Just tell me by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      We are good at both. The problem isn't panic though. Panic is caused by uncontrolled fear. Fear of death is real fear. It is also inevitable. Thus people fear the inevitable, and act irrationally when faced with it. IF you want to solve the fear of death issue, then we need to face our own mortality, dead on (pun intended).

      Unfortunately, we have too many people trying to avoid facing it, who hide and obfuscate death, because they are scared of it. Feedback loop completed.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    110. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its not the 50 dollar DR visit. Its the 2000 ambulance ride and the 15 dollar a pill asprin. I'll stop bitching about the price when they start charging fair prices. Capiche?

    111. Re:Just tell me by Bengie · · Score: 2

      Paying $100 for a nail spa: no problem.
      Paying $50 for a doctors visit: Oh the humanity.

      It's hard to change the way people think, you're better off just going with the flow. It would be awesome if people were logical, but they are not. And the sooner you understand that, the sooner you can make things better. Letting people mange their own finances for medical is the problem. People are not good at long term decisions. Tax them and make it a universal service. I'm not sure about the exact implementation, but no matter what you do, people will find a way to game the system.

      Perfect is the enemy of good. Making the system better should be a higher priority than making it ideologically perfect.

    112. Re:Just tell me by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0

      I don't know about virus mutations, but I rather doubt I'll trust the government to tell me the truth. They were greatly mistaken about Ebola in the US, from the moment they said "do not worry, it isn't coming here" to the time it arrived was less than one week. THEN they tell us that it is hard to catch, and then two workers have caught it, and several others are in quarantine waiting for 21 days to go by. And we've spent nearly 1 Million dollars trying to clean up the first case.

      So, excuse me when I don't believe our government. It lies, that is what it does. Because to tell the truth is more dangerous than to lie and simply say "oops sorry".

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    113. Re:Just tell me by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      You know, if there was an actual pool (forget a shower) of something that would kill thus stuff, I wouldn't hesitate to swim in the stuff for a few minutes prior to taking anything off. Not getting this virus is worth the extra peace of mind to be double, no....triple damn sure.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    114. Re:Just tell me by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Doctors and nurses need to stop being lumped in with free government cheese before there is any hope that the general public will cherish them.

      If people didn't have to pay anything to go to the doctor then they would feel less resentment about the experience. The last thing you want when you're down is to be kicked. Remember how going to the doctor was back when you were a kid and someone else handled all the paperwork? Compare and contrast to how it is now. When health care is a guaranteed right, people go get health care when they need it, with the result that people aren't wandering around in poor health infecting other people and so on. By all means, let people pay for cosmetic surgeries on their own if you must (I think there's good arguments for some of them as well, but let's let that be a separate argument) but when someone gets sick, you want them to seek health care before it impinges upon your health.

      If people didn't have to worry whether their insurance was going to cover their health care, either because they knew that it would or because they didn't require any such thing, they'd all be a lot healthier. Don't you want to live in a society of healthy people? Or do you really want to head down the slippery road (heh heh) towards zipping up your hazmat suit before getting out of your armored car so's you can cross the secured parking garage (never know what might be blowin' in the wind, even without any of those undesirables near you) on your way to the hermetically-sealed shopping mall?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    115. Re:Just tell me by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Can someone tell me why so many talking heads are saying "It would be a BAD thing to stop allowing any normal commercial flights INTO the US from that part of Africa till they get it under control?

      I don't think there are any direct flights from that area into the US. Thomas Duncan came through Brussels. It's probably impossible to totally quarantine such a large area.

      Note that both of the Ebola patients were health care workers directly involved in the care of Mr. Duncan and so were exposed to him when he was extremely contagious. None of the people in the family he was staying with or the Emergency Room workers appear to have been infected and it's been long enough that we would probably know that by now.

    116. Re: Just tell me by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      How does ebola help large corporations? Stop with this brain-dead thinking. You think big corps such as McDonalds or Walmarts are helped by this? MAYBE some pharma companies are but the transportation and hospitality sector is crushed. Think bro instead of regurgitating this crap.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    117. Re:Just tell me by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 2

      This isn't the first ebola outbreak West Africa has had. It's not an especially "fast moving" disease, either. And "soldier on to what may be a post apocalyptic world" is a great way not to spread panic</sarcasm>. In the developed world, we can contain ebola. If it spreads past the infected Texas healthcare workers, that wouldn't be good, but the world's not ending.

      Reading your post, I'm reminded of a Slashdot poster during the housing crisis who said he was betting with his investments on sustained, deep economic decline. I wonder how that worked out for him.

      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
    118. Re:Just tell me by Slim_Jack · · Score: 2

      Or lying on an exit survey and taking some tylenol to hold down the flu while you board a plane.

    119. Re:Just tell me by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      You fail statistics and understanding.

      You're not exactly getting an A in kindness and politeness yourself.

    120. Re:Just tell me by GLMDesigns · · Score: 0

      Not so. How do I know that they are paid well? Because people line up to get those jobs. If the pay wasn't enough people wouldn't be flocking to those positions when the jobs open up. Ever see the line for people trying to get a fireman's position? It goes around the block.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    121. Re:Just tell me by Wookact · · Score: 1

      Ok, You have a choice. Get infected with the flu that kills what like 0.1% of people who catch it. Or get infected with Ebola that is currently killing 70% of the people who catch it.

    122. Re:Just tell me by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's common advice good for flu as well (flu season's coming!).

      I second this. I started being conscientious about this a few years ago, and I now get sick a lot less often. And that's with having a few kids in school, plus having started to using public transportation during that period.

      I have no idea how much that helps with Ebola, but if we're lucky, most of us have more to fear from the flu.

    123. Re:Just tell me by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      It sounds like chlorine bleach does the trick. But I'm not sure if there's an overlap between (a) a concentration that will definitely do the trick, and (b) what I'd be willing to swim in.

    124. Re:Just tell me by Wookact · · Score: 1

      The current news shows this second nurse was on a flight from Ohio the day before she got her fever. And since you can be contagious before you even have the fever, I say we need to start getting worried.

    125. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did as him., he lied. He lied a the airport, and he lied at the hospital.

      The rest of you post is just plain ignorant.

    126. Re:Just tell me by Wookact · · Score: 1

      I wont catch a spike to the head just because my friend/family member/Significant Other/Neighbor/person at bus stop/stocker at grocery store/etc. caught a spike to their head. Your analogy fails badly.

    127. Re:Just tell me by SydShamino · · Score: 2
      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    128. Re:Just tell me by Njorthbiatr · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm aware how healthcare really works.

      I'm saying after he tested positive for Ebola, obviously.

    129. Re:Just tell me by MichaelJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

      According to the Times she was not symptomatic at the time of that flight; however, I would consider it nearly criminal for her to have chosen, even lacking symptoms, to fly in a plane or be in any public confined space until well after the maximum possible incubation period after the last moment she could possibly have been exposed to the contagious patient.

      --

      Michael J.
      Root, God, what is difference?
    130. Re:Just tell me by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I know a nurse who supported a family of 10 on her salary from working three 12 hour shifts a week.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    131. Re:Just tell me by Njorthbiatr · · Score: 1

      Something like 95% of people don't wash their hands long enough to kill germs... Or thereabouts if I remember the statistic. That was done on college kids.

      I wonder what the number is in healthcare.

    132. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't about statistics, it's about keeping score. And right now US healthcare has two black eyes.

    133. Re:Just tell me by Minupla · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, EBOV (and all other currently known strains of the Ebola family for that matter) transmits using a subset of the flu transmissions mechanisms, so if you're safe from the flu, you should be safe from EBOV too.

      Min

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    134. Re:Just tell me by Njorthbiatr · · Score: 1

      Exactly my point. They knew they weren't equipped to handle it, yet they tried to anyway. That's just careless.

    135. Re:Just tell me by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      The reason the flu is so scary is because it could mutate into something that kills 70% of the time. And that's just as likely (or moreso) than ebola mutating into something that's airborne. See how easy it is to use that logic both ways?

      Anything that might kill us has two parts:
      1. Chance of it happening to us.
      2. Chance of it killing us if it happens.

      Our powerful pre-frontal cortex should multiply the two, and realize that something with a 0.0001% chance of happening and a 70% chance of killing us is no more or less life-threatening than something with a 70% chance of happening and a 0.0001% chance of killing us. But our primitive hunter-gatherer brains increase our fear of rare but occasional events, and downplay our fear of regular events, so we distort that curve.

      To pull a few more statistics out of my ass, I bet there are many people who demand the government do everything they can (including suppressing civil liberties like freedom of travel) to protect citizens from ebola, while they simultaneously hate and condemn the government for its efforts to restrict smoking. And I bet more of those people will die (at an otherwise young and healthy age) from smoking than ebola.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    136. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, why should a doctor suspect Ebola in an African patient, when at the same time whole planes went into full panic when somebody coughed.

      Huh? You think irrational behavior on the part of idiots is justification for irrational behavior on the part of an educated doctor?

    137. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      and the question is what the hell was she doing in Ohio?

      She's on the Ebola monitor list, one of her co-workers has already demonstrated that they had a second Ebola screw up (the first being letting patient zero go home for two days), and she's flying around the country?

      All patient's zero's medical contacts should be in isolation until they have a better idea of just how badly patient zero was handled. The number of secondary infections is probably not going to stop at two.

    138. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's far more likely to have a killer Influenza mutation that to have an airborne Ebola mutation. Remember H1N1 "bird flu" killed 3% of the world population in 1918.
      Right now a deadly H1N1 is a real possibility, it has happened before and we don't understand it enough to prevent it from happening again.
      An airborne Ebola, while terrible, is an imaginary threat. It has not happened before, and with what we know today it is an unlikely scenario.

    139. Re:Just tell me by eegad · · Score: 1

      I'd say as long as the info we keep hearing is self-contradictory, the answer is yes. Obama says to the African nations, go ahead and ride the bus. The CDC advises against this. We're hearing that the mortality rate is 70% yet these are the numbers being reported: https://www.tickermadness.com/... And then of course there is just gross incompetence and stupidity. Who thought it'd be a good idea for health care workers treating an Ebola patient in Dallas to fly around on commuter planes with the rest of us? Maybe we could organize a community potluck with the rest of them for moral support?

    140. Re:Just tell me by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      simple. because those persons can go to a third country and then travel from there. it creates an impetus for persons from West Africa to simply try to evade such controls. this would of course worsen the situation, not improve it.

      the world as a whole needs to be sending more resources to West Africa to fight the epidemic *there*. that is the only thing that will help stop this from becoming an actual pandemic.

      Err...with our flight systems, can we not pretty readily track anyone flying OUT of that area, and know if they are coming from a connecting flight within the 20 or so day incubation period?

      I have nothing wrong with sending resources...BUT, I still see no reason to allow free travel out of the area especially with cases on the rise, I hear projections that soon it will ramp up to 10K a week or so over there. At some point, we need to expand the quarantine to the NATION and not just hospital rooms.

      Better than have it reach pandemic proportions, and we "rest of the world" find ourselves in a position of deciding to do something even more drastic. Better to close the area off till it can be controlled, than to have it become Uncontrollable, and we have to resort to measures to protect the world by "cleansing" the area in a much broader sense. (warms up the nukes).

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    141. Re:Just tell me by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      It might be better to simply bite the bullet, acknowledge that there is Ebola in Texas, and after giving non-residents a chance to leave, simple seal up Texas and route all flights to and from infected areas to that state.

      There's a BIG difference between taking care of your own, vs allowing other outsiders in to damage you.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    142. Re:Just tell me by Bartles · · Score: 0

      Because shutting down flights from African countries would be racist, you bigot.

    143. Re: Just tell me by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      It's all about money and large corporations-----you and I don't make a difference.

      That doesn't make any sense.

      Exactly what large financial contribution to the world is made currently from West Africa?

      I can't imagine the US or world economy would even register a *blip* if West Africa was totally cut off from the world. Not that I was saying that, I was merely saying normal, commercial flights from there shouldn't be allowed. Special military and sanctioned flights would be ok, since you could that way ensure quarantine actions be observed from anyone coming back from one of those very, very limited flights.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    144. Re:Just tell me by Bartles · · Score: 1

      What breach in protocol was that?

    145. Re:Just tell me by Bartles · · Score: 1

      I think you have it backwards. This is Ebola we're talking about.

    146. Re:Just tell me by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I don't think there are any direct flights from that area into the US. Thomas Duncan came through Brussels. It's probably impossible to totally quarantine such a large area.

      Well, I'd think with today's computer systems, it would be pretty easy to keep track where someone is flying from. We could pull up his history ,see he came from WA within the danger period, and put him on a US no-fly list till he passed that danger time limit.

      Note that both of the Ebola patients were health care workers directly involved in the care of Mr. Duncan and so were exposed to him when he was extremely contagious. None of the people in the family he was staying with or the Emergency Room workers appear to have been infected and it's been long enough that we would probably know that by now.

      And if patient "0" hadn't made it to our shores at all...these two people wouldn't now be ill and in jeopardy.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    147. Re:Just tell me by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm not sure I understand what you're complaining about. We already spend tons of money on flu mass-vaccinations, anti-smoking campaigns, cancer research, etc. Nobody's saying that we should stop these in favor of ebola hysteria.

      And how do researchers really know that it's unlikely that ebola might transfer genes with another pathogen to either make ebola more communicable or to make some other common pathogen more virulent? How is that likelihood measured?

      Ebola is highly controllable, for now. Seems to me that we should get on top of this potential threat before it becomes serious.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    148. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is something I really do not understand. Aren't the people who have been in contact with a proven victim supposed to be limiting their exposure?

      Sure, early on, everyone was wearing rose tinted glasses and reciting the comforting matra "Have you licked an ebola victim? No? Then you're safe". But on Monday, it was know that there was an infected nurse. Sure, the talking head were blaming her for the exposure. That's their job. But weren't there responsible people with power who actually gave thought to the possibility that the fault was in the equipment and procedure, and moved to isolate the medical workers?

      Sometimes I despair in the incompetence of those who end up in power. Makes me wish, sometimes, for the comic book Lawful Evil villains, who would have said:
      "He flew to my land, lied to my henchmen about his close contact with an Ebola victim, and endangered my subjects? Shoot him, burn the body, and put everyone whom he met in the last five days in cell for a month. Buah-ha-ha, I'm so evil!"

    149. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The reason why Ebola is so scary is because it kills 70% of it's victims AND supposedly "safe" healthcare workers who were following the correct protocol were tripped up by the massive complexity of removing PPE safely.

      It is additionally scary because of the cowboy-like attitude of the CDC who say "we got this" and "you can't get it if...." and yet here we are with two additional cases in Texas and two additional cases in Spain.

    150. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This disease prays on your concern for the sick.

      But, luckily, only on Sundays, so it's manageable.

      Those that care for the diseased are the ones at risk. As they get sicker and sicker, people deal with the mess and viola...

      Others have already commented on this one. No need to pile on.

      If it turns into a real mess, all it would take is Rich people fearing for their own lives to put up the money to start mass producing this drug. Also, it appears the Russians have a few drugs starting trails as well.

      Well, if the Russians are trailing this...

    151. Re:Just tell me by daveschroeder · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, it didn't. It was "some sort" of droplet transmission by monkeys in adjacent cages.

      That is NOT -- repeat, NOT -- "airborne" transmission.

      And no, it didn't go through the ventilation system; it was later learned that sick monkeys sneezing while they were being transported past well monkeys did indeed transmit the virus in this case.

      It was also a completely different strain than the one we are talking about.

      Airborne transmission occurs when an infectious agent is able to cling to particulates in the air and ride air currents for significant amounts of time, over significant distances, through ventilation systems, etc., long after the infected person who expelled the virus is no longer in the area.

      Droplet transmission is NOT "airborne" transmission. It is projecting bodily fluids directly onto a well person in close quarters...usually less than 3 feet, but under optimal conditions, perhaps further. That is still not airborne transmission.

      Furthermore, coughing/sneezing is probably one of the least effective ways to spread Ebola, even via droplets. Blood, feces, and vomit are the primary ways this will be spread. Yes, virus "could" be in saliva, mucous, semen, etc. But that's not the primary way Ebola spreads.

      Airborne transmission would be very bad, but the Ebola virus is too large to spread this way. It would have to shed about 75% of its genome to be small enough for airborne transmission in sub-5um droplet nuclei that could ride on particulates. And if it did that, it wouldn't be "Ebola" anymore -- it would be something very different; perhaps still deadly, perhaps not, and so much different from what we are talking about right now that it is next to meaningless to discuss.

      So, in closing: no, Ebola is not airborne.

    152. Re:Just tell me by Iniamyen · · Score: 1

      10 cats doesn't count

    153. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No incompetence on the part of the Hospital admitting staff is why he died.
      Patient to admitting ward at Dallas hospital - "I just came from west Africa and have a fever, I don't feel well and think it might be serious"
      Admitting Ward - "sorry can you not see that we are busy here, if you only have a fever take some aspirin and go see your physician."
      Patient - "so you are not going to do anything for me?"
      Admitting Ward - "Sorry you can wait for a few hours and we might be able to get to you by then"

      The patient left and before he even stepped into his house he collapsed and vomited.
      2 days later he went to the same Hospital, and said I have been to west Africa. and finally they tested him for Ebola.

      Our Hospital Staff is not ready to deal with such a contagious disease just like the aid workers and doctors that were killed by it before they knew what they were dealing with.

    154. Re:Just tell me by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      There might be plenty of people lining up to take those jobs but that doesn't mean it's not underpaid.
      I know plenty of people who love to teach, I also know plenty of people who have abandoned teaching
      because the pay was too poor. My experience going thru public education in the US was that
      teaching was dominated by two groups of people. Group 1 was people who loved to teach so much
      that the stuck with it despite being underpaid. Group 2 was people who did it because it was the
      best paying job they could find. If people are lining up around the street to get a job then they need
      to increase the quality bar until everyone in Group 2 is eliminated. Thousands of people apply for
      jobs at google when there is a job opening. Does that mean google should reduce their pay until
      only a handful of people apply? Not unless they only want poor or mediocre candidates. Same
      applies to teachers, cops, nurses, etc.... If there are that many applicants it's much better to raise
      the bar.

    155. Re:Just tell me by JeffAtl · · Score: 1

      It's not clear why you're singling out hospitals in the United States.

      It's also not clear why you are playing the "understaffed" card. Every organization in the world claims that it is understaffed.

    156. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Right-but it's also been reported that her temperature just before the boarding the flight was 99.5 and the CDC is now trying to get a hold of everyone on the plane. In other words, it's close enough to her being symptomatic that they're not really certain-and are erring on the side of she could have given this to fellow travelers.

    157. Re:Just tell me by CensorshipDonkey · · Score: 1

      Have you considered that for many of these people, if not most, the non-monetary rewards outweigh the low pay? Altruism and satisfaction from helping others does exist.

    158. Re:Just tell me by bigpat · · Score: 1

      Why aren't nurses required to wear the same protective gear as the people cleaning up Ebola contaminated waste... fresh from the patient projectile vomit seems like a much higher risk than three day old bed sheets yet the requirements don't seem to be in place for full protective gear for nurses... I think if the CDC guidelines aren't updated to include full protective gear such as requiring full hazmat suits when in the isolation room with the patient, then we haven't learned anything.

    159. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      simple. because those persons can go to a third country and then travel from there. it creates an impetus for persons from West Africa to simply try to evade such controls. this would of course worsen the situation, not improve it.

      the world as a whole needs to be sending more resources to West Africa to fight the epidemic *there*. that is the only thing that will help stop this from becoming an actual pandemic.

      Your (GP) "solution" makes the problem exponentially worse for others and, here's the real kicker, it makes it worse for you too! People flying from country E with Ebola to country F without it and then the U USA are then exposing TWO flights worth of people instead of just one. Or N+1 vs just N since most flights may not be direct anyway. If I need to get back home, back to work or my family, I'll figure out a way. Three intracontinental flights, a bus trip and then another flight to get home? So be it.

      You are trying to increase my risk to decrease yours. That's basically war. If you want me to honestly answer those kinds of questions - where have you been, etc - don't make certain answer a death penalty. If I think I am healthy and you want to quarantine me with people suspected of a deadly contagious disease, I'll do what I can to avoid the quarantine if I'm a rational person. Hell, I'll assume I just have a common cold and not Ebola, and shoot myself full of antihistamines or whatever to mask my symptoms and avoid your death penalty. If I'll get a clean top notch medical care in a private room away from other suspected Ebola carriers, then you have a shot at honesty. If I trust you - which, let's be honest, is not a strong point for the USA after Bush's wars and Obama not reining it in.

    160. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would consider it nearly criminal for her to have chosen, even lacking symptoms, to fly in a plane or be in any public confined space until well after the maximum possible incubation period after the last moment she could possibly have been exposed to the contagious patient.

      So your solution is that anyone who could possibly have been infected should be quarantined for 21 days with... other people who may have been infected so that they can be exposed AGAIN at any point in that 21 day prison sentence, right? Or is there some private vacation island quarantine zone you think is being underutilized? There needs to be a pre-stocked food, water, etc for 21+ days too on that island, otherwise the pizza delivery guy might catch it (or carry it in in the first place). If so, I think maybe I might be exposed too, if the wifi is good so I can telecommute.

      First order thinking is the sign of a third class mind.

    161. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "We will, from this moment forward, ensure that no individual monitored for exposure undergoes travel in any way other than controlled movement," Frieden said Wednesday.

      More closing of the barn door just a little bit late. How long before the CDC loses the whole 'we know what we're doing' BS and starts to seriously start to consider what they're missing in the way of plans and contingency plans.. Despite the CDC's confidence and preparedness and assurances the CDC has been blindsided by perfectly predictable events. On another note, this is another Ebola victim who flies to their family potentially infecting them all. Shelter in place people!

    162. Re:Just tell me by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The protocol to comply with Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations at 29 CFR 1910.1030, which includes Use of engineering and work practice controls and appropriate personal protective equipment
      (gloves, face and eye protection, gowns); obviously the engineering controls were inadequate for the hazard presented and personal protective equipment was inappropriate.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    163. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - training medical personnel (the infected nurses are a disgrace to their hospital's procedures)
      - purchasing equipment to deal with Ebola (better suits, gloves, etc...)

      I'm curious how you are so positive that the hospital had appropriate procedures in place to handle an Ebola outbreak, before you jumped to shaming them. I would be absolutely shocked if they had these procedures outlined before the first case showed up, and I thought the first nurse to get it was the one that treated him initially. You kind of contradict yourself with the next point as well, since having appropriate procedures would imply having appropriate isolation equipment.

      I hate to link CNN as a source, but they have some interesting comments from the nurse that are there.

    164. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just got off a conference call with NNU. The RNs in Dallas weren't properly trained and there was no policy followed by an ever changing protocol and there are still no cleaning protocols. They didn't have access to proper supplies. Housekeeping wasn't cleaning up biohazard waste which piled to the ceiling!

    165. Re:Just tell me by Bartles · · Score: 2

      What specifically was the action that breached the protocol?

    166. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virus mutations aren't my specialty but from what I've read Ebola mutating to become airborne isn't a high probability.

      This is an understatement, even. For all intents and purposes, it is impossible for Ebola to become airborne short of human intervention (IE: weaponization, experimentation, etc...) The mechanism of action just isn't there. Ebola isn't some sentient killer trying to decide how it can be most lethal. It works like any other virus. Mutations that allow it to spread more effectively typically win. Since the virus does not affect the lungs airborne is not a good method of transmission. It can't even survive effectively at room temperature. Plus it mutates pretty slow. 100 times slower than Influenza A.

      While anything is technically possible, airborne Ebola is just fearmongering, either due to ignorance or ratings.

    167. Re:Just tell me by ultranova · · Score: 1

      You see, being insensitive to one's place of birth is RACIST.

      I congratulate you on your honesty, and so do the mods it seems. A lesser man might had tried to claim he meant recent locations, but you came right out and admitted it's about immigration.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    168. Re:Just tell me by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

      Your NSA has everything under control. Trust them -- Blame them.

    169. Re:Just tell me by aynoknman · · Score: 2

      And if patient "0" hadn't made it to our shores at all...these two people wouldn't now be ill and in jeopardy.

      Actually patient "0" is reported to have been a two year old child in the town of Guéckédou in Guinea.
      Thomas Duncan's patient number was likely between 4,000 and 12,000.

      If the international system had taken the issue seriously when Guinea announced 59 dead (March 22) instead of August, Thomas Duncan wouldn't have been a patient. Calling him patient "0" makes false assumptions about the Atlantic or Mediterranean, i.e., that they afford us some sort of protection rather than just delaying the inevitable.

      My personal opinion is that this won't be an extermination event, but I don't expect to see civilization as we know it in 5 years. I hope the vaccine makers and distributers are successful and that my expectations are not met.

      --
      We need a "+1 -- nice sig" moderation.
    170. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue is that this has a 70% mortality rate and no effective treatment. If it ever gets a foothold in this country, we might just be hosed. We may not know everything about how it spreads, either, so our only real hope is that containment remains mostly effective.

    171. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your solution is that everyone who flies anywhere in the world must have their details sent to the US Government so that they can track where they have travelled? You don't see a problem with this? Consider the scenario: passenger flies from West Africa to Brussels (like Mr Duncan) and then flies to Moscow. Should their flight details be sent to USA just in case later on they fly from Moscow to USA? How about if China insisted that anyone who flew from Mexico City to Washington must have their travel details registered with Beijing, just in case they previously flew from West Africa to Mexico?

    172. Re:Just tell me by nbauman · · Score: 1

      That's called 20/20 hindsight, Mr. Armchair Surgeon General. Had you been there, with a patient with the symptoms of some viral infection, I'd have liked to see you saying "of course it's Ebola!", when in reality, there are dozens of alternative diagnoses, many of them much more likely.

      I sure as hell would have asked, "Have you traveled outside the U.S. recently?"

    173. Re:Just tell me by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Our healthcare system is economically screwed up beyond comprehension, and Obamacare did absolutely nothing to adjust economic and outcome decisions for the better, just piled on more incentive to perform more needless and expensive testing.

      For all his flaws, Obama did give a recess appointment to Donald Berwick as administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Berwick's demonstrated expertise was to adjust economic and outcome decisions for the better. He would have made decisions based on cost/benefit calculations like the UK NICE system. He managed a nationwide program that reduced hospital infections and saved lives, so he actually can deliver.

      Unfortunately Berwick's appointment was sabotaged by the Republicans, who refused to confirm him, so her resigned.

    174. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      She was supposed to self-isolate and was forbidden from traveling in that fashion. It's criminally negligent that she did, knowing (as a healthcare professional) that she had just treated a patient with an extremely dangerous infectious disease.

      Also, it seems that the hospital had no fucking clue how to handle Ebola patients. They should've been in full fucking hazmat suits. Instead they were apparently being told to wrap their exposed necks with surgical tape. WTF?

    175. Re:Just tell me by nbauman · · Score: 1

      There is currently no effective test to tell whether a person's presenting symptoms are from ebola or from the flu.

      The simple effective test to tell whether somebody may have Ebola is to ask them, "Have you been outside the U.S. recently?" If they've been to West Africa, then you can worry about Ebola.

    176. Re:Just tell me by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      There are infectious disease protocals that should be in place at any hospital. H.I.V. and measles or viral menangitus risks combined with trauma injuries for instance would have required enough protections in the initial contact to have prevented the spread. They simply were not prrepared to have a third world disease in a first world country.

      As for sealing off the state. The nurse in question already went running around the country trying to see how many people she could expose. It could be too late to isolate it but you would only need to seal off Dallas. Texas has a huge border we already cannot close. If we tried to seal off the entire state, you might as well make screen doors for submarines. This government simply isn't up to the task.

    177. Re:Just tell me by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      >The flu does not.

      EV-D68 virus is actualling kiling people in the US...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...

    178. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter where it was. This type of transmission in other viruses has shown an average of 2.1 infected per every patient in the hygienic western hospitals that we're told have no trouble containing it (e.g. norovirus).

    179. Re:Just tell me by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Actually in my experience doctors rarely ask that. OTOH, the doctor I usually see knows me, and knows I rarely travel.

      The problem here is that the initial symptoms are non-specific.

      OTOH, I expect doctors will very soon start ASKING if you have travelled recently. (And maybe they usually do for new patients.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    180. Re:Just tell me by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Not in the last several decades. Go back 60 years, though, and it's a different story.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    181. Re: Just tell me by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      And, boy, are his arms tired!

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    182. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CDC could also do 1 video training with an online step by step course and if well built, train 100K+ rather fast

    183. Re:Just tell me by steelfood · · Score: 1

      No, she had a low grade fever the day of the flight, which indicates a very high probability she was infectious not just on the flight, but before she left.

      It's not just the other people on the plane who're at risk. If she spoke to someone at the baggage counter, that person's at risk too. If she used the bathroom, the next person to use the stall would be at risk. Not as high a risk as if she had been vomiting or even speaking, but it's still at risk.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    184. Re:Just tell me by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      I don't know if West African transport systems keep the necessary records. Remember, also, that the US has shown itself not good at keeping track of people with names not in the Latin alphabet.

      We can't shut down the infected area. It's much too big. If we try to seal it off, people who want to travel elsewhere will sneak out somehow and spread into neighboring countries, spreading the disease. If we let people travel out of the area, we can at least monitor them.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    185. Re:Just tell me by JeffAtl · · Score: 1

      It does matter. Some hospitals are better prepared for this type of thing. The two hospitals previously noted are among four the in nation that are equipped and have the expertise for this type of thing. The hospital in Dallas is not.

      Emory Hospital in Atlanta had 2 ebola patients 2 months ago and there were no transmissions.

      Your anti-western bias is not serving you well.

    186. Re:Just tell me by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Yup. They answer "yes" and cough on you. Game over for the nurse asking the questions. The only way to deal with that is to have every health worker coming in contact with anybody with nonspecific symptoms be in protective gear.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    187. Re:Just tell me by steelfood · · Score: 1

      The Ebola infection rate was 100% of the monkeys kept in the same room with infected pigs.

      I believe that's the airborne strain that doesn't affect humans.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    188. Re:Just tell me by Zalbik · · Score: 1

      But recognize that the ebola death curve is exponential.

      Yes. In third-world countries with poor sanitation, little to no access to modern medical facilities and nearly no education on the identification and handling of ebola victims.

      Ebola has been around since the 70s. This is the same virus. Although the impact of this outbreak to west africa will be massive, the overall impact to the rest of the world (especially first-world countries) will be minimal.

      Stop your fear-mongering. It doesn't help.

    189. Re:Just tell me by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Note that, in the US, people will tell you not to go to work when you're sick. What they don't tell you is how to get paid anyway (for hourly jobs), or not get yourself fired when you feel sick and the manager's stressed. Typically, US companies lump vacation time in with sick leave and call it Personal Time Off or something, so if you get sick a lot you don't get a vacation.

      If the country as a whole actually got supportive of the idea of not coming in when sick, that would be a Good Thing.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    190. Re:Just tell me by steelfood · · Score: 1

      No, the reason it's so scary is the #3 is clearly untrue at this point. The protocols are either not being followed, not being enforced, or simply insufficient. Looking at the CDC response and the hospital's response, it's almost like the protocols are being developed as they go along. Select hospitals have training and protocol established. Knowing the insides of a hospital a bit too well, I know most are winging it.

      You might expect that for 3rd world countries, but for 1st world countries like the U.S. with a world-class health care system, this is a shock to a lot of people (especially the people who think the U.S. is the best at everything). That's why there's so much noise about ebola. In fact, most people already know (because most people have been to hospitals enough times they know what goes on there) that our medical facilities would be completely inadequate to handle even one case, forget a full-blown outbreak. Couple this with the incredible amount of mobility of a 1st world country, and it's almost a given that there'll eventually be cases everywhere so long as the outbreak in West Africa remains uncontained. And most people know that with enough cases of ebola, the system will simply collapse. That's the scary part.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    191. Re:Just tell me by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

      Last I read, they are suspecting the nurse(s) got infected performing dialysis and intubation, neither of which are ever done for Ebola patients in Africa. There's a lot more possible exposure while doing stuff like that. And it may have been a simple unprotected neck or perhaps an error when taking the infection protection stuff off.

    192. Re:Just tell me by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

      I think the Texas hospital caused the infection _because_ we used First World thinking.
      1. They did NOT spray the hazmat clothing down with bleach before taking it off--something they do in Africa
      2. They suspect the nurses became infected performing intubation or dialysis, neither of which are done for patients in Africa.

      Everything, even advanced medical technology, comes with pros and cons, benefits AND costs.

    193. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem was when they first started flying patients home, and then subsequently allowing flights to continue from those places.

      There is an active epidemic, and apparently the border people are just saying "oh, cool, just been back helping Ebola victims? Come on in!!"

      Everything about how this is being handled just screams incompetence.

      I've noticed that quite a few of you guys who are concerned about how this ebola epidemic is being handled are hearing screaming voices in your heads. Maybe you should get that looked at by a (mental health) doctor. At the very least you should probably stop watch Faux News and listening to Rush Limbaugh for awhile. Just a thought.

    194. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the justifactions is the constitutional protection for freedom of movement. I promise you President Obama, Americans do not expect you to extend that to Africans. We can't safely treat Ebola patients in the U.S. the best we can do is seal a person with Ebola symtoms in a plastic bag, gas them and dump their body in a site appropriate for biomedical waste. If we can't stop the spread of Ebola can you imagine how unprepared we are for any serious outbreak of airborne contagion which Ebola is not.

    195. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we please stop comparing Ebola to the flu?

      Why? Ebola has a high Case Fatality Rate, but a low R0 score. The flu has a relatively low Case Fatality Rate, but a high R0 score. Comparing them is perfectly relevant, as long as you understand the difference between virulence and transmissibility.

      The flu is a health concern, yes, but widespread infection of Ebola is a nightmare that would make (in Sierra Leone, "makes") most years' flu seasons look like a sneezing fit.

      But inherent qualities of the flu make it very unlikely that Ebola will ever achieve the widespread pandemic status that the flu can achieve. People could stop the spread of Ebola tomorrow, if they were willing to simply avoid direct contact with ANYBODY else for 25 days or so.

    196. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly: total mortality = "very few people die in plane crashes" mortality rate = "if your plane crashes, you're probably going to die."

      The magic of statistics is that they can point out when you're being an over-reactive, hyperventilating tit. Your chance of dying from Ebola is relatively high, once you contract it. Your chance of contracting it is relatively low.

    197. Re:Just tell me by Slim_Jack · · Score: 0

      The fundamental problems of the healthcare situation in the US were ignored - regardless of the individual bean counter - the trial lawyer association in America controls the Democrat Party (Obama).

    198. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hang on, there are three hundred million million people in the US? holy crap! no wonder you have so much pollution!

    199. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason that ebola is so scary is that if it mutates to become airborne, it is going to become really, really hard to control

      And that's true, no matter how much hyperventilating you do about it.

      Rabies is so scary because if it ever becomes airborne and starts infecting people just by breathing it in, NOBODY WILL BE SAFE FROM RABIES!

      HIV is so scary, becasue if it ever becomes airborne and starts infecting people just by breathing it in, NOBODY WILL BE SAFE FROM HIV!

      There's a million diseases out there that, if they "ever became airborne," would mean humans were in for a world of hurt. What we know now is that Ebola is NOT - presently - airborne, and the standard controls are effective. Suggesting that we need to "get serious" about ebola because it might "someday" become airborne is just stupid. ANY virus COULD mutate that way, somehow... and we could all die when a massive asteroid slams into the earth and destroys the entire planet. So I guess we better get serious about that too!

    200. Re:Just tell me by nbauman · · Score: 1

      I read the Case Records in the New England Journal of Medicine, and when they describe a case, they usually or always tell whether the person had traveled outside the U.S. Although this is at a referral hospital where they get the tough cases.

    201. Re:Just tell me by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Unprepared doesn't indicate incompetence. Unprepared means the big guys in DC were telling people it was "rare" and "unlikely" to get to the US, less than a week before. You want to blame someone, blame the people dismissing it as not a threat at the top levels. The incompetence you want to start with, is CDC, WHO, Obama Administration who didn't want to admit there is a problem. GOLF!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    202. Re:Just tell me by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      That was sarcasm. It means that we were too fucking busy being PC that we didn't ask the right questions out of fear of offending people.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    203. Re:Just tell me by WuphonsReach · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ebola would have to shed about 80% of its mass to get airborne. At which point, it probably would not be Ebola any longer. There's just a huge difference between fluid-borne and air-borne viruses in terms of mass.

      Droplets are the big issue, small enough not to be visible to the naked eye, but with a range of 1-2m (3m if the wind blows hard).

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    204. Re: Just tell me by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

      Hahahahahahahahahaha. Funniest shit I've read all day.

      --
      Chewbacon
      The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    205. Re: Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      panic? Its going to be on all the money soon, or did you think they are burning that too?

    206. Re:Just tell me by lazy+genes · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, there needs to be a profit made somewhere for it to work in our economic system. We will have to wait for an 8 year old to make a How to survive an Ebola outbreak video.

    207. Re:Just tell me by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the terms are used differently in different parts of the world. Hmm. Not so easy to show what I mean given Slashdot's limited HTML subset. Here goes:

      When I say geometric, I mean each successive term is the same multiple of its previous term.

      When I say exponential, I mean each successive term is the previous term raised to some power.

      Let Qn be the quantity on the nth day, and C be some constant value. then

      In a geometric progression, Qn+1 = Qn * C, such as (when C = 2)

      00002, 00004, 00008, 00016, 00032, ...

      In an exponential progression, Qn+1 = Qn ** C, such as (again when C = 2)

      00002, 00004, 00016, 00256, 65536, ...

      I'm using leading zeroes to keep the digits nicely lined up, so each nth term is in the same column in both series.

      With regard to the ebola situation, it might well be that the geometric constant will be a higher value than 2 while the exponential constant is a smaller value than 2. Say the geometric increases at 3 while the exponential increases at 1.7. Then (rounding to nearest whole number)

      0000003, 0000009, 0000027, 0000081, 0000243, 0000729, 002187, ... (geometric, C=3)

      0000002, 0000002, 0000005, 0000014, 0000084, 0001871, 365155, ... (exponential, C=1.7)

      I think that shows how dismal Malthus' mathematics is. We need a breakthrough, like the impact the internal combustion engine had on food crops. But you just can't plan on miracles happening when you need them. That isn't part of the human condition.

      --
      Will
    208. Re:Just tell me by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are expressing an alternative view, and you are certainly welcome to do that. I do not welcome your attempt to shout down any disagreement with your personal world view, but I recognize that is a not uncommon irrational response when something about your world view is important, and you cannot think of a rational response. There is a four year old in each of us.

      The "facts" you cite are disputable. Some of them are just plain wrong. For instance, this is not the same virus as "what has been around since the 70s"; this is a new variant.

      You demonstrate a lot more faith in the first world's ability to meet a possible global pandemic than I personally think is reasonable. How much of that faith is hubris? No need to answer; hubris is one of those labels that can only be applied after a disaster. By its very nature, hubris is blind to itself.

      --
      Will
    209. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if we only have enough drug to treat a few thousand people,

      From the tobacco reference I gather you're referring to ZMapp.

      I've got bad news... we don't have enough to treat a few thousand people. The entire world's supply was used (and saved 7 out of the 11 people it was given to) in late September and it'll be December before they can harvest any more. The best hope for a treatment before then (in that it can be produced "immediately" and appears to work), and afterwards when the next dozen or two doses of ZMapp are used up, appears to be serum injection.

    210. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what we really need is more Dr. Houses. It amazes me how great the man is. Whenever I go to a hospital, I spend 6 hours waiting to get my blood pressure checked. Dr. House on the other hand can diagnose a rare disease, operate on the patients brain, and cure said patient in only 1 hour. His team of generalists can perform all operations form replacing a heart, to swapping out a lung or two. What the fuck. If President Omama had really wanted to fix the health care system he would have just appointed Dr. House as surgeon general. As it is President Obamas corporate overlords have just guaranteed expanded profits for the corporate heath goons, who are in no way whatsoever as affective as Dr. House.

      -Dr. House for surgeon general

    211. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what he was saying - "I walked outside."

      He was pointing out the risks people were taking by walking through the hospital.

    212. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can only catch it by ingesting another persons bodily fluids.

      At least read wikipedia before posting bullshit.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...

      Human-to-human transmission occurs only via direct contact with blood or body fluid from an infected person (including embalming of an infected dead body), or by contact with objects contaminated by the virus, particularly needles and syringes. Other body fluids that may transmit ebolaviruses include saliva, mucus, vomit, feces, sweat, tears, breast milk, urine, and semen. Entry points include the nose, mouth, eyes, or open wounds, cuts and abrasions.

      For example, you sit in a chair that another person sat in and is damp with their sweat. Yes, that easy. You don't need to lick the chair. Just sit in it. Put your hands where the other person sat.

      This also means if someone sneezes, that could be another method of transmission.

      And no, Ebola is not airborne. Airborne are things like Small Pox.

    213. Re:Just tell me by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      But now to remove the other glove, the exposed hand (which cannot touch anything contaminated! not even to run it against something!) must dig under the cuff the glove where it's uncontaminated and remove the glove that way. yeah, do you decontaminate your hands again to be sure, but still).

      To take off the second glove simply use the first. It is inside out at this point.

    214. Re:Just tell me by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The CDC techs treat everything as if it's about to explode. That's counter-intuitive as well. The reality is gloves mask and eye protection are perfectly good. The problems so far have been in correct handling of PPE. Slapping more PPE on is not the answer.

    215. Re:Just tell me by Solandri · · Score: 1

      In case anyone doubts this: ratio of "normal" patients vs. infected healthworkers
      third world: ~ 10:1
      Texas: 1:2

      These things are evolutionary. The initial rate of patients to infected healthcare workers is much higher. The current 10:1 ratio in Africa is after all the healthcare workers using poor infectious disease protocols have been killed off by ebola. It's purely survival of the fittest.

      Same reason Cuba weathers hurricanes better than Louisiana did after Katrina. Cuba gets hit by several hurricanes every year, so any buildings which would been blown away, dams which would have failed, etc. have already done so long ago. The ones still standing remain because they are strong enough to survive a hurricane. Any government officials who were incompetent at post-hurricane recovery have long been filtered out. OTOH the previous major hurricane to hit Louisiana before Katrina was some 30 years ago. A lot of bad structures and incompetent officials can build up over 30 years.

    216. Re:Just tell me by einyen · · Score: 1

      Would you say it's time for us to crack each other's heads open and feast on the goo inside? Yes, I would.

    217. Re:Just tell me by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      In case anyone doubts this: ratio of "normal" patients vs. infected healthworkers third world: ~ 10:1 Texas: 1:2

      These things are evolutionary. The initial rate of patients to infected healthcare workers is much higher. The current 10:1 ratio in Africa is after all the healthcare workers using poor infectious disease protocols have been killed off by ebola. It's purely survival of the fittest. Same reason Cuba weathers hurricanes better than Louisiana did after Katrina. Cuba gets hit by several hurricanes every year, so any buildings which would been blown away, dams which would have failed, etc. have already done so long ago. The ones still standing remain because they are strong enough to survive a hurricane. Any government officials who were incompetent at post-hurricane recovery have long been filtered out. OTOH the previous major hurricane to hit Louisiana before Katrina was some 30 years ago. A lot of bad structures and incompetent officials can build up over 30 years.

      So how come the rest of the US fares much better than Texas? There were 5 patients evacuated to the US so far, and nobody got infected. Hey, maybe it's not all of Texas but just this hospital - but they sure fucked up.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    218. Re: Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I remember correctly, both the two nurses were from the first visit, when it was just flu like symptoms. Also, she did clear her traveling with the CDC, which moves the onus of the flight on them not her.

    219. Re:Just tell me by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      Yes. It's possible. But supply and demand affects job prices as much as it affects commodity prices. Some jobs are undesirable (for whatever reason) and they command higher salaries as a result of poor supply (of available workers). Others have people lining up because it's desirable (teaching) and the wages are pushed down due to an abundance of supply.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    220. Re: Just tell me by TC+Wilcox · · Score: 2

      If I remember correctly, both the two nurses were from the first visit, when it was just flu like symptoms. Also, she did clear her traveling with the CDC, which moves the onus of the flight on them not her.

      Even if the CDC "cleared" her for travel she should of known better being a medical professional. She knew there was a chance she had ebola and was contagious and she choose to travel. The CDC didn't force her on that plane. Just because a government agency tells you something is "ok" doesn't mean you can turn your brain off and a absolved from all consequences of your actions.

    221. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy went there and told them he probably had Ebola. Hospitals do not care about people, they just try to kick them out. Every time I go to a doctor or a hospital I tell them exactly what the problem is and what the diagnosis is and they ALWAYS get it wrong, refuse to treat me, and make me worse than I started. The hospital has only one concern, and that is with insurance fraud and meeting their quotas and using people to train students, even if they have to fabricate cancer diagnoses and whatever to accomplish that, or murder people to use their bodies and organs.

      Oh, but don't worry, you're going to have a minimal invasive benign procedure. Don't tell the patient the truth or they will refuse treatment, and above all else, don't tell them that the doctor switches place with a bunch of incompetent children who are actually going to operate on you. Hide all material facts because we're fraudulent organized criminals, and Lie on the medical records and prevent the patient from getting them and seeing them.

      The fact is that Duncan went in there and they were racist and didn't want to treat him, and he probably had an outstanding balance too, another reason they all go out of their way to murder you, and they kicked him out no matter what he said, which is standard patient-mill operating procedure. The tall guy is offering his plasma to the nurses, he did not offer his plasma to Duncan, yet he goes on and on about god and whatnot.

      The medical system is extremely corrupt and no one knows about it and you're all a bunch of cold blooded psychopaths and organized criminals, carefully brainwashed about how out of control malpractice is by the insurance industry when it's virtually non-existent, and you all don't even know about it either, and go out of your way to actually defend this massive failure of this out of control system. And as usual, you and all the other doctors defend what any other person did, no matter how wrong, because you're a organized criminal, a co-conspirator, and part of the problem.

    222. Re:Just tell me by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Ebola is not a smart disease. It's too hard to spread and kills too easily. Basic sanitation and seperation is generally all it takes to keep it contained and prevent it from spiraling out of control. the fact it's so deadly actually helps prevent its spread, as it can burn itself out.

      In contrast the flu spreads extremely easily and is much hard to stop. And. That actually makes it more dangerous, allowing to infect and kill more people before its done. Every year it kills about 36000 people in the US alone. And that's a normal, minor flu year.

      Truly bad flu epidemics, which we thankfully havent seeni n some time, can kill in the millions. The 1918 flu killed between 50 and 100 MILLION people, 675,000 of them in the US. It was the single deadliest event or chain events of the entire 20th Century.

      So yes, you're right.
      We should stop comparing it to the flu.
      The flu is far more dangerous.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    223. Re:Just tell me by dywolf · · Score: 1

      your chances of being infected with the flu are >95%
      your chances of being infected with the ebola are almost nonexistant.

      a plane crash is nearly always fatal for most of hte folks on baord.
      but your chances of actually crashing are slim to none.
      perspective matters.

      The flu is far more dangerous on the whole than ebola. Worldwide wide it kills in the undreds of thousands every year. Ebola isnt even in the quintple digits yet. the biggest difficulties in Africa that contribute to its spread are economic and cultural, rather than the disease itself. Because of the combination of its difficulty in transmission and high mortality rate, Ebola if left to its own devices is far more likely to burn itself out than become a truly threatening epidemic. Ebola in a country like the US is a non threat.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    224. Re:Just tell me by Wookact · · Score: 1

      The chance to be infected with ebola are only almost nonexistent because it hasn't made its way into the general population yet. Once that happens then the chance of being infected skyrockets. You should stop glossing over that.

    225. Re:Just tell me by werepants · · Score: 1

      It sounds like protective equipment was nonstandard and a bit haphazard, and the healthcare workers were improvising their own improvements. For instance, apparently some of the workers were using tape around the cuffs of sleeves, pants, etc, which seems like it provides a better seal, but in reality the most dangerous point in offering care is in removing your protective gear. Adding tape makes it harder to remove equipment without touching the outside of it, so that is one current suspicion for how these workers got infected.

      The solution is standardized, proven equipment and well-trained personnel, along with a culture of rigorously following best practice, 100% of the time. A slip up in any of these areas could lead to infection. I do think it's a problem that we've got mainly private, for-profit institutions entrusted with this, because all of these things are costly from a business perspective and so there's a strong incentive to do the minimum you can get away with.

    226. Re:Just tell me by dywolf · · Score: 1

      No, it doesnt skyrocket.
      Look at the onyl people to be infected in this country: two of the nurses who were in close contact with an infected man after he was sick. None of the people who were on the plane with him.

      the chances to be infected are so low because the transmissibilty of Ebola is on the very low end of diseases. First, the person has to be showing symptons. People not showing symptoms are not contagious. Preventing its spread really is as simple as good hygeine, not coughing on people or getting coughed on, isolating patients, santizing equipment and room. The transmissibility of ebola is NOTHING like that of hte cold, the flu, or measles.

      Our culture, our sanitary habits, our medical system and our faith in it, are far different from that in Africa. Differences that have contributed to its spread over there. We have top notch medical in this country that we dont fear (death squads masquarading as "medical teams" arent a thing over here), we nearly all of us practice obsessive hygiene and sanitation, we dont keep living in the same 1 room home with a patient who is infected after they become infected, and we dont leave dead infected bodies rotting in the open cause we're afraid to bury it.

      If a whopping 2 people getting infected scares you, think on this: last year there were over 60,000 motor vehicle deaths, 40,000 gun deaths, and 36,000 deaths to the flu.
      I say it again: Ebola is a non threat, regardless of your ignorance or that of whatever news/panic-machine youve been watching.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    227. Re:Just tell me by Wookact · · Score: 1

      If you get say 10 people into the general population (IE not admitted to a hospital) with ebola, you will see infection skyrocket. You claiming otherwise is akin to you putting your head in the sand and pretending there is no problem.

    228. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err...with our flight systems, can we not pretty readily track anyone flying OUT of that area, and know if they are coming from a connecting flight within the 20 or so day incubation period?

      So, they just drive to the next uninfected country over; slip through one of the very long land borders somehow (just like the US's southern border - we all know how porous that is), and fly from there (and unintentionally infect people that country along the way) to avoid the hassles of flying from their home country.

      That does not seem a better solution in any way to me.

    229. Re:Just tell me by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      with our flight systems, can we not pretty readily track anyone flying OUT of that area

      Because your (USA's) flight systems extend as far as the origin points of flights that terminate in your country. What happens outside that, you're dependent on other countries (or the traveller themselves) reporting information to you. (Of course, the NSA are probably perfectly well aware of the full flight history of anyone leaving the area, but they can't admit to that without being jailed.)

      Better than have it reach pandemic proportions

      It may have reached that point already. The WHO are expecting that, by Christmas/ New Year (when there will be a global surge of travel, intranationally and internationally) essentially every country in the world will have had several cases arrive from West Africa (albeit via third countries). The likelihood of secondary cases from those primary cases is high ; whether there are then tertiary cases is going to depend on local responses.

      Which doesn't mean that we're fucked - just that global vigilance is going to have to increase and efforts at containment will have to increase rapidly too. So ... maybe every international airport in the world is going to need the nearest hospital dedicating to isolation cases. And if that means that no operations which are not urgent get carried out in the remaining hospital beds, then that may be the price.

      For what it's worth, it's plausible that the number of deaths from the economic disruption caused to the three core countries is already exceeding the number of deaths due to the virus.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    230. Re:Just tell me by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I don't think there are any direct flights from that area into the US. Thomas Duncan came through Brussels. It's probably impossible to totally quarantine such a large area.

      Most of the flights I saw when travelling through the area in the last year were to and from other African countries, or to and from France (they don't call it "Francophone West Africa" without reason). But I was in Abidjan one day (I think - they blur one into the other after a time) and ISTR there was a flight to Rio de Janeiro.

      But, so what about the lack of direct flights? I can get anywhere in the world with the possible exception of Antarctica within 24 hours and probably 3 flights. The door is open.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    231. Re:Just tell me by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd think with today's computer systems, it would be pretty easy to keep track where someone is flying from.

      "Com-puter sys-tems" .... sorry, but haven't you flown on hand-written tickets this year? I have. In (well, from) West Africa.

      I'm not 100% sure if all of the countries in question have a US embassy. For certain, many of them simply don't have direct flights to the US, nor do they have US-airlines flying in or out. So why would they have US-compatible systems? (I don't recall seeing a single US operator on any of the boards over the last year, but I wasn't looking for anything other than my flight)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    232. Re:Just tell me by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I hope the vaccine makers and distributers are successful and that my expectations are not met.

      GSK-Beecham were putting out an item to the UK's morning TV news (I'm watching at the moment) that they don't think they could be shipping an effective vaccine before 2016, at the earliest.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    233. Re:Just tell me by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Except for that one very specific symptom of traveling to Western Africa!

      Don't worry, that won't be a helpful symptom for much longer.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    234. Re:Just tell me by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I believe

      I think I'd rather rely on published journal papers, thanks.

      that's the airborne strain that doesn't affect humans.

      Yet.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    235. Re:Just tell me by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Ebola has been around since the 70s

      Ebola virus has almost certainly been around for a lot longer than that. It was identified and characterised in the mid-1970s.

      It's entirely possible that, for millennia, whole villages or towns have been wiped out by Ebola at 10 yearly intervals. But with no survivors, nobody knew what had killed them.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    236. Re:Just tell me by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      The beautiful thing will be if a vaccine is produced.......watching the cognitive dissonance in all those anti-vaxers who also are posting hysterical things about ebola. Will they risk the autism?

      Just hold onto that thought for .... at least 14 months.

      GSK are not expecting to have a vaccine in production lines before 2016.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    237. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me tell you something, if I knew I had ebola in the hospital I would go there and make a BIG stink about it and try to convey that fact to the hospital. And they wouldn't care and send me home anyway, because that's how corrupt those organizations have become. They are patient mills and they especially hate when you diagnose yourself with things. This is how incompetent bureaucracies are. You have to go there and explain your problem 12 times and only 1 of those people are going to care or give a damn. The rest are going to pass the buck until you get to the doctors who does not care at all and will send you home.

      All signs suggest to me that Duncan TOLD them that he probably had Ebola, and I suspect he came to the united states to get help to begin with. How the hell do you think it came to be known that he was caring for and transporting a patient with Ebola?!

      Please cut all the Medical Apologist statements. Duncan Tried to tell them and they did not do anything because they're a bunch of morons that are operating a butcher shop for money making ONLY.

    238. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is purely speculative and ridiculous.

      Quarantine is the gold standard of stopping disease spread. Your argument is that quarantine is going to cause people to try to evade quarantine, therefore do not implement quarantine because it will not work.

      Then you claim ridiculously that the ONLY thing that will work is if MORE people go there to help. That can still be arranged with a quarantine in place, moreover, that is not the ONLY thing that works, as you allege. Quarantine Also works and needs to be implemented. Everything that helps needs to be done, including Quarantine.

      The statements you are making are not logical at all.

    239. Re:Just tell me by hankwang · · Score: 1

      You are probably the only one in the world who uses that definition of 'exponential'. The exponential function has the property exp(x+1)=2.7*exp(x), which is completely analogous to your geometric series.

    240. Re:Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take a lot of precautions when dealing with sharp/spiky objects, and generally try to avoid them when possible. That's why my apartment (as i would imagine yours too) is relatively safe to navigate in the dark. Had I allowed any random jackass to wonder into my apartment and wedge knives/spikes and other sharp objects anywhere they felt like, I can guarantee you I would have been at least cut by now if not dead.

  2. Ebola won't kill us all, but some disease will. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has shown us that we have no idea how to handle any sort of outbreak.

  3. But flights from West Africa are OK? by Squidlips · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why?

    1. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by Enry · · Score: 1

      Because it causes panic in the target countries, they flee through porous borders and spread the disease more. Other countries think the problem is fixed, never bother screening at airports or other border crossings and they still get in anyway.

      How about this for a counter-question: Why aren't we quarantining Texas?

    2. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why aren't we quarantining Texas?

      I've been asking this for years.

    3. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by alexander_686 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would we want to? How would that help? I mean, beyond the theatrical power of showing politicians waving their arms around?

      The man who caused the Texas outbreak came from London. Before that Belgium. If there were more flights then we would actually know whom to screen instead of having to screen everybody who comes into the country.

      Heck, they are talking about screening people coming into my hometown airport. While we have a large west African population we have no direct flights there.

    4. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      Why?

      Because the loss in economic activity that would result would kill more people than Ebola.

      The Flu will still kill more people in Africa this year that Ebola. Keep that in mind.

      A terrified public is very profitable for CNN/FOX/CBS My personal favorite were the stories of people rising from the dead. lol

    5. Re: But flights from West Africa are OK? by caveqat101 · · Score: 1

      And Alabama. And D.C., and the adjoining pathways. Damn, that's all the U.S.

    6. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      They don't have a fucking clue. And it's clear that even in my state of Texas (one of the *the* best states for advanced medical care and treatment) they don't have their shit together! WTF?! Now imagine hundreds of people flooding into hospitals. I have zero faith in the "system" now. Bunch of fucking morons who elected even bigger morons in office. Idiocracy on full display.

      Like I said, if the world implodes in on itself, you guys are on your fucking own with the exception of a few close people in a clan/tribe. Water, food, guns, and ammo in that order.

      Yeah I'm pissed! Stop this shit right now! Contain it!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by SpockLogic · · Score: 1

      Why aren't we quarantining Texas?

      I've been asking this for years.

      Texas was ready to secede from the USA, maybe now is a good time.

    8. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, now that we've had 3 cases in the Dallas area, we might actually see the US-Mexico border secured... ...by the Mexican government.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    9. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by SpockLogic · · Score: 1

      Why?

      Because the loss in economic activity that would result would kill more people than Ebola.

      Economic activity ??? This is what you get when profit is the driving force in the "health care industry".

      Now is the time to make the whole nations health the priority.

    10. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      You mean Los Zetas?

    11. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Exact opposite would happen. The souther border would be overrun as that 3rd-world hellhole would be worse off. Mexican's would flood into America in attempt to flee to safer ground, ostensibly.

      http://www.washingtontimes.com...

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    12. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if we had single-payer health care, a reduction in economic activity would decrease the tax revenue needed to pay for it.

    13. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by rbrander · · Score: 1

      "One of the best?" Meaning, there's a good hospital or two there somewhere that they send you if you have some rare cancer? Great. But the fact is, Texas is 33rd in health spending out of 50. They've cut and cut and cut. The US has on a national basis, mostly in the last 10 years, but red states of course more than most.

    14. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

      I used to think that it was something in the Texas water. But now I think its the Texas dust. It does something to their minds. You can tell their speech centers are affected--- they just don't talk right.

      --
      Will
    15. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's this thing called passports and visas, which indicate were people have been... It wouldn't be hard to have an actual travel ban.

    16. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      If only there was some way to know where a passenger arriving from London actually started his journey from.

      Maybe I'll invent some sort of passenger tracking system that government officials at airports can use as people get off the plane.

      Give me $10,000,000, and I'll have something for you by next year.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    17. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may be tangental to the main discussion, but just to react to:

      I have zero faith in the "system" now. Bunch of fucking morons who elected even bigger morons in office. Idiocracy on full display.

      When one set of morons running for office have the opinion that government doesn't work, don't be surprised if, once elected, they ensure it doesn't.

    18. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by Slim_Jack · · Score: 1

      You claim the problem is that Texas has "Cut and Cut and Cut" but when Duncan came in initially for treatment not only did they review him, a non US citizen, they gave him a 'CT Scan' -- the money was being poured at the individual walking in with flu-like symptoms, as ever, but the whole system is so messed up CYA kills common sense.

    19. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I proudly present "The problem with flight bans"
      Probability of an importation event = disease prelevane at source * number of travels from source to target
      Cut travel, say 2X you cut probability of importation 2X. Except, oops it only takes 3 weeks for disease prelevance at source to rise 2X and you are back where you started. 4x cut wins you 6 weeks, 8x cut wins you 9 weeks etc.
      If that was really all there was to it, well fine travelban away. But there is a very direct cost to it, all the international ebola aid - it works through civilian air travel. Seriously, they are trying to get charter flight etc but its slow going. A travelban would essentially cut off all interntional aid. Nobody in their right mind would go to help if they know they cant come back.
      So travelban pretty much guarantees ebola response will fail. Epidemic will continue at exponential rate and turn your travelban useless in no time.
      Result: Catastrophe.

    20. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by Wookact · · Score: 1

      Yet they sent home someone who had come from West Africa (and informed them of this), and had a 103 degree fever with some antibiotics. They screwed the entire shebang up. It seems to me that they did what they thought would cover their backsides and then sent him home.

    21. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Economic activity = health.
      When industry breaks down, food can't be grown, people don't get paid, people starve to death... which is a far more horrific death than Ebola. The Cocoa crop is already likely to be a total loss this year because of border lockdowns. Now Cocoa is obviously not a staple, but its harvest was the sole source of income for hundreds of thousands of people in that area. Think about loosing an entire years salary and what that would do to your family. No imagine if you were already living hand-to-mouth. The overreaction to outbreaks like this ALWAYS kill more people than the disease itself. For the love of god, stop watching pandemic movies on discovery channel.

    22. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Economic activity = health.
      When industry breaks down, food can't be grown, people don't get paid, people starve to death... which is a far more horrific death than Ebola. The Cocoa crop is already likely to be a total loss this year because of border lockdowns.

      Oh my God!!! Cocoa crop a total loss?!? That is the very definition of The End Of The World As We Know It(TM)! We have to put a stop to this right now!

      Now Cocoa is obviously not a staple,

      Says you. If there were no more chocolate then life just wouldn't be worth living anymore.

    23. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like I said, if the world implodes in on itself, you guys are on your fucking own with the exception of a few close people in a clan/tribe. Water, food, guns, and ammo in that order.

      Yeah I'm pissed! Stop this shit right now! Contain it!

      Oh, look! Another internet survivalist! We haven't seen one of you guys for at least...oh, I don't know...the last 15 minutes or so.

    24. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "One of the best?" Meaning, there's a good hospital or two there somewhere that they send you if you have some rare cancer? Great. But the fact is, Texas is 33rd in health spending out of 50. They've cut and cut and cut. The US has on a national basis, mostly in the last 10 years, but red states of course more than most.

      Overall and by every metric, Texas is one of the best states in the country for medical care*. Also, Alabama and Mississippi are two of the best in literacy.*

      *and by best I mean top fifty.

    25. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet I'm sure that you think that they're the xenophobic bigots, right?

    26. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that logic the USA is #1 in education and healthcare. Hint: throwing money at problems does not automatically increase efficacy.

    27. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by nbauman · · Score: 1

      But what about the Austin problem? We can't abandon them.

    28. Re:But flights from West Africa are OK? by Zalbik · · Score: 1

      The Flu will still kill more people in Africa this year that Ebola. Keep that in mind.

      Really?!? 300,000 people are going to die of the flu in africa this year?!?

      From the CDC's estimate of Ebola cases located here, taking the LOW count and assuming a 60% mortality rate (also low).

      This is a huge problem for Africa. A much much more serious issue than the flu. It just isn't (too) much of a concern for western society as we have much better access to modern medical facilities and much more money to throw at the problem.

  4. Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you aren't involved in healthcare, don't. Ebola spreads by contact with infected fluids, and is fairly difficult to spread. The competent healthcare infrastructure of the US, and generally better sanitary practices, means that we actually are able to quarantine infected individuals and slow the spread of the disease. The main worry is that the infected countries will keep sending us a few infections every few months or so for the press to talk about.

    If you are a healthcare worker, you should worry, because much of the containment protocols necessary to keep YOU from getting sick aren't always being followed. Remember: If you are going to be handling Ebola anything, you need protective gowns and masks at all times.

    If you have actually contracted Ebola and survived, hold off on sex for a few months.

  5. goes to show by Virtucon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This goes to show how much we rely on so-called experts in this area and they have no fucking clue what they're doing. The CDC, the NIH should have been all over that hospital. This is not a lab experiment, and until they can come up with the protocols to assure healthcare workers safety then they need to start quarantining all people who come in contact with a contagious patient or sending them to a standardized facility where the risks to the public can be minimized.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:goes to show by tibit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's just so wrong.

      Pray tell, what jurisdiction does CDC or NIH have to be "all over" anything? None whatsoever. NIH is a research establishment. CDC is essentially a federal health department that has jurisdiction nowhere (maybe in DC?). There are no standardized facilities that you refer to. A research lab is not a clinical facility. Just because a lab is set up to handle highly infectious diseases doesn't make it a place where you can treat people.

      The experts in this area are doing just fine, working with shit that makes Ebola look like a seasonal allergy, at facilities that are set up for that. Those people are usually not MDs, there's zero reason for them to be MDs. They're biologists of various sorts.

      Demonstrably, no infectious disease experts were in charge at the facility/facilities where the health workers got infected. So your point that experts are unreliable is entirely moot. There were no experts in charge to start with.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    2. Re:goes to show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protocols exist, recommendations exist. States are not forced to follow those protocols or recommendations. Hence, there are a number of states with third world quality public health and services, such as Texas, have poor management, poor training as a result of poor management decisions, non-existent protocols and inadequate supplies to combat public health crises.

    3. Re:goes to show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're one of those fear mongers from the early HIV era?

    4. Re:goes to show by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Take a deep breath....
      First of all the health care workers involved were monitoring their temperatures so the got isolated quickly and before they where highly contagious. Sending the patients to facilities trained for this is probably a good idea but then you still have the risks involved in transport. Finally I have to admit that I fear this a case where the CDC did send the right instructions but they failed in not knowing what what the Hospital did not know. They might have sent instructions to use full protective gear including eye protection, gloves, and foot coverings.
      To the CDC that means tapeing the gloves and booties and face shields and respirators.
      To a metro hospital it may have just meant gowns, booties, gloves, and goggles.
      The CDC can only do what the government can let it do. The current administration did not start preparing soon enough IMHO. The current administration also has not seemed to have involved USAMRIID yet and of course the current administration disbanded the Aeromedical Isolation Team in 2010... Not the best move.
      Really do not panic people it is not anywhere an ignition point yet. This is not the end of the world.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:goes to show by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      hrm, looks like CDC has powers to quarantine, but generally for national entry and interstate travel. within states i'm thinking it serves in an advisory capacity for state and local authorities. States rights baby.

    6. Re:goes to show by Slim_Jack · · Score: 1

      If the CDC goes _anywhere_ in the U.S. for pandemic containment, a quick phone call to the President / Federal authorities should open _any_ door.

    7. Re: goes to show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That information must have accidentally been routed to the spam box....

    8. Re:goes to show by DaTrueDave · · Score: 1

      Pray tell, what jurisdiction does CDC or NIH have to be "all over" anything? None whatsoever.

      They don't have to use brute force. All they have to do is give the hospital advice and make public statements when the hospital refuses to follow the advice. Between public opinion and lawsuit liability, enough leverage will be produced to successfully "encourage" the hospital to follow expert advice.

      The CDC could definitely flex more muscles if it wanted. It doesn't want to. It thrives on a populace that is afraid and thinks the CDC will save them. The CDC wants to balance public opinion so that CDC looks very necessary because of the threat, but that the threat is not so great that the people start to panic or think that even the CDC can't help.

  6. Virus burn out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I'm wondering when it's going to burn itself out. January? March? June of next year? One would think, given the mortality of Ebola, EVERYONE involved or near it, would start behaving accordingly and taking appropriate actions to mitigate persistent spread. Even in the lesser educated, and uninformed West Africa, they have to start changing behavior at some point, right?

    1. Re:Virus burn out? by MozeeToby · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem is that in the real outbreak areas (parts of west Africa, especially Liberia) there simply isn't enough protective gear to go around, let alone facilities or trained personnel to use them. In many places they are doing triage, sending patients home who they know to have Ebola because there simply isn't room. Now, if two trained nurses wearing most of the necessary protective gear got sick treating a patient in a modern hospital setting, how do you think average people are going to do treating their sick family members? At that point, things spiral rapidly out of control, which is exactly what we've seen in those regions and is why the WHO says if they don't get more beds, supplies, and doctors in place soon we'll see more than a million infections before the end of January.

    2. Re:Virus burn out? by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      This is what has happened in the past.

      The difference this time is that it has not limited itself to small isolated villages. It has hit multiple large cities. If this thing is going to burn out – rather than be stomped out – we have yet to see the real carnage.

    3. Re:Virus burn out? by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Agreed, this is a horrible problem and the numbers are increasing in terms of infections and deaths in Africa. The biggest issue with other nations is complacency in believing that local and national health officials can handle it when it spreads outside of Africa. It's clearly being proven not the case in Texas and in Spain with healthcare workers getting infected. I'm not sure the WHO even has the resources to combat this.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    4. Re:Virus burn out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, while they have containers of equipment sitting there because stupid officials still want their bribes at customs there.

      I pity the people, but these are countries where there apparently would always be money for AK 47s for the next riot or buying machetes for the next civil war.

    5. Re:Virus burn out? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      You either have all of the necessary protective gear, and use it every time , or you might as well be naked, licking every surface. Ebola is not something to joke around with; take it seriously or it will very likely kill you.

      If you suspect you have Ebola, you don't call a cab to take you to the emergency room, where you sit in the waiting room exposing hundreds of people for hours. Call your local health department, or the CDC, and lock yourself inside your already contaminated to hell house/apartment/condo/cardboard box/whatever. You stay the f*** away from other people.

  7. Citation needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do you work for the CDC or NIH? Or do you take your talking points from the vapid tripe spewed by the media?

    1. Re:Citation needed? by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Really have you read the latest from the dumbfuck running the CDC? Would you consider the Washington Post a good source of information?

      “We did send some expertise in infection control,” Thomas Frieden said during a news conference Tuesday. “But I think we could, in retrospect, with 20/20 hindsight, have sent a more robust hospital infection control team and been more hands-on with the hospital from day one about exactly how this should be managed.”

      Inept and incompetent and I'm sorry but a mia culpa isn't going to cut it.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    2. Re:Citation needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry but a mia culpa isn't going to cut it.

      I agree. A serious situation like this calls for a full blown "oops."

    3. Re:Citation needed? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really have you read the latest from the dumbfuck running the CDC? Would you consider the Washington Post a good source of information?

      “We did send some expertise in infection control,” Thomas Frieden said during a news conference Tuesday. “But I think we could, in retrospect, with 20/20 hindsight, have sent a more robust hospital infection control team and been more hands-on with the hospital from day one about exactly how this should be managed.”

      Inept and incompetent and I'm sorry but a mia culpa isn't going to cut it.

      You do realize that this basically translates to "Yeah, we should have known those Texan hicks couldn't handle a case of the flu, let alone Ebola."

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    4. Re:Citation needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if the federal government wasn't letting the state be overrun with illegal immigrants, clogging up emergency rooms with 'flu-like symptoms', the staff could have been trained and ready for the new immigrant horde bringing foreign diseases to this country.

      I'll see what you say when ebola infects a nurse at a Massachusetts hospital.

    5. Re:Citation needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem stupid.

    6. Re:Citation needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you want to make this a States Rights sort of issue? Let the Texas hospitals work it out with state research and state dollars?

      Or do you want to claim that this is a national security issue and ask for help from the Feds?

    7. Re:Citation needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really have you read the latest from the dumbfuck running the CDC? Would you consider the Washington Post a good source of information?

      “We did send some expertise in infection control,” Thomas Frieden said during a news conference Tuesday. “But I think we could, in retrospect, with 20/20 hindsight, have sent a more robust hospital infection control team and been more hands-on with the hospital from day one about exactly how this should be managed.”

      Inept and incompetent and I'm sorry but a mia culpa isn't going to cut it.

      You don't know how to read management-speak.
      What he said was, "We had no idea what a bunch of fuck-ups were over there in Texas. We should have been all over their asses the instant this shit went down."
      Just because you don't understand what someone is saying does not mean that _they_ are the dumbfucks.

    8. Re:Citation needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that this basically translates to [...]

      Only to a bigot does it translate that way. What next Grand Wizard? Should we burn crosses on their lawns?

    9. Re:Citation needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona get to secure their borders, and force the deportation of illegal aliens, without the Feds sueing them for upholding federal law?

      Texas would be doing very well without the fed's involvement in this matter. But since it would affect poor brown-skinned people, they aren't allowed to make their own rules.

  8. Race card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The family of the guy who died is already playing the race card. They are complaining he received sub standard care because he was African.

    1. Re: Race card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He more than likely did.

    2. Re: Race card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      African non American in an ex slave state? Ya sir yo betcha.

    3. Re: Race card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He more than likely did.

      Really?

      You don't think the fact that he lied his ass off at the airport in order to fly into another country for care had anything to do with it?

      And now this human (yes, this is the way I look at it, because I'm not racist) may have cost two other people their lives.

      Take that race card and shove it up your ass.

    4. Re:Race card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And they would have cried racism if he had only had the flu but ebola was suggested by the staff.

    5. Re: Race card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberia was founded by freed American slaves, it's revenge of the slaves.

    6. Re: Race card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you think the first time he showed up at the hospital, "I have been in contact with an ebola infected person in liberia" would have been something he should have said.

    7. Re: Race card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People are not real people unless they are black. I don't have a t.v. so I couldn't tell you the races of all those involved, but I am an astute connoisseur of media sensibilities. According to the media everyone form Africa is an African American (media term for black). Everyone form America (media term for the USA) is in fact a white racists and not really fit to live. You say his lie might have killed two people. But see that is just your inbred white privilege speaking. White people are not people. They are just privileged white CO2 producers who through their white privilege think they have right to not die.

      A person is not a person in the media unless they are either black, native American, latino, jewish, or female (but not one of those inbred white females)

  9. Cairns Ebola response not much better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two doctors in Cairns, Australia were stood down over critical comments of the hospital's handling of a suspected Ebola case. Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service Chief Executive Julie Hartley-Jones said “These comments undermined the fantastic job our staff have done in managing this case, caused needless community concern and were ill-informed."

    The health service is investigating - not their Ebola procedures - the investigation is disciplinary in nature.

    http://www.9news.com.au/national/2014/10/13/19/38/doctors-stood-down-after-cairns-ebola-scare

    1. Re:Cairns Ebola response not much better by tibit · · Score: 1

      Hinterland. Nuff said :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  10. their own fault by slashmydots · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I worked in an IT department in a hospital and even I had to go through biohazard and infection protection training. These workers came into contact with the patient's bodily fluids. That's sort of frowned upon for medical professionals. Forget ebola. Under normal circumstances, they could now have hepatitus, AIDS, or basically anything else. People this careless are a time bomb. Ebola was just the one that got them.

    1. Re:their own fault by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ah yes, lets blame the victims, the very people who were trying to help a very sick, very dangerous man while he lay in a hospital bed dying.

      What the fuck is wrong with you!?

      If AIDs or hepatitis were anywhere near as communicable you would see a mass exodus from the medical profession: working with sick people would be a death sentence waiting to happen. You can work with, live with, eat with, share a bathroom with, even fuck (with appropriate protection) people who have HIV or hepatitis without contracting it and you can do so for years if you're careful. We've now had 2 out of a team of perhaps 60 who cared for Duncan get sick. Does that sound equivalent to you?

    2. Re:their own fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked in an IT department in a hospital and even I had to go through biohazard and infection protection training. These workers came into contact with the patient's bodily fluids. That's sort of frowned upon for medical professionals. Forget ebola. Under normal circumstances, they could now have hepatitus, AIDS, or basically anything else. People this careless are a time bomb. Ebola was just the one that got them.

      Or even a mix of them, like EBOLAIDS!!!

    3. Re:their own fault by itzly · · Score: 1

      If the victims made a mistake (not saying they were), it is perfectly appropriate to blame them. The fact that they were trying to help sick people doesn't have anything to do with that.

    4. Re:their own fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The 'ebola is hard to catch' meme is ignorant. The only difference between the ebola infection pathways and those of a randomly selected cold virus is that ebola does not survive as long in the extremely small airborne fluid droplets. On top of that, while the risk is lower, ebola does start manifesting in sweat (in small amounts) days before symptoms show.

      Up until your internal body tissues start dissolving, the symptoms of ebola are roughly identical to a week-long flu. As many posters properly point out, thousands die of flu complications each year, but that just adds to the problem. Either we have some ebola carriers who dismiss their symptoms as a flu until every capillary in their body ruptures, or the medical labs are completely bogged down in samples to test for ebola (with the risks added by overstressing such a resource).

      For anyone who values human life, there is no 'win' situation when ebola is concerned. Maybe one of the experimental treatments or vaccines will work well enough, but even devoting all relevant facilities to producing the successful option will not catch up with the outbreak before things have gotten much worse.

    5. Re:their own fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all the above is true with ebola. The only major difference is the whole "bleeding out" part of the disease which is sort of a dead give away to be extra cautious. The real problem is that apparently this and other hospitals aren't prepared for an ebola or even more virulent disease which, like the GP said, means that luck more than preparedness or correct protocol is what's protected the people for so long.

      The talk from one article speaks of hospitals trying to listen to a CDC teleconference on preparing for ebola and (1) the conference being overloaded and (2) hospitals saying they'd be bankrupted if they followed the CDC's suggestions. For (1), this sounds like a combination of way too many hospitals believing being they are on the front lines and must be directly connected to the teleconference (instead of a recognition that long ago an action plan should have been created for the risk of epidemics that designated a relatively few hospitals to be the contact with the CDC to ask question and disseminate information down the line) and a general overreaction of panic so hospitals can say something like "we talked to the CDC, so we're prepared". For (2), this sounds like, again, a lack of an action plan that would entail having a [relatively] local contact hospital which would be responsible for caring for ebola (or similar) patients who would be notified in advance and would be part of a joint nationwide insurance policy to defray the costs of the quick mobilization to treat such a patient, possibly including flying in CDC or other experts.

      But, instead of admitting that the basic problem is that we have a patchwork health care system that is not well coordinated and for which the government's involvement is spotty at best... It's both little wonder that we have hospitals that don't have much of/any protocol to deal with such problems and that we have under trained staff who are put in place with insufficient protection who may not know any better--enough though some common sense may have helped (hard to say without knowing the details).

      So, I don't disagree at some level. There's lots of blame to go around. Pinning it on a few healthcare workers is no sort of answer to actually dealing with the problem. It's also not as easy to simply blame the hospital (or the CDC) as if there's a real system in place to allow for the sort of care that would stop an epidemic. The thing that frustrates me the most? Those who rally against federal involvement; those who constantly support the notion of a self-created mesh network of supply and demand to solve problems; those who constantly work to cut the budget of and work against any approach to unify the health care system. They want a medical special ops team to magically appear and save the day at the last minute as if life were a TV show where dedicated people magically have the resources and means to supply the people and materials and cut through the red tape they created. Yet it's precisely the systematic, top-down approach to turn a mesh network of providers into a semi-organized collection that work towards obtaining the resources when necessary from a collective pool and who have well established rules that have long ago set boundaries of where the red tape may lie which is what would work. Clearly hospitals won't or can't take the bottom-up approach enough* and wer'e all suffering for it.

      * Plenty might in plenty of areas, but they're generally contained to such a small area that "networks" exist in isolation. We can't just build the equivalent of a healthcare internet because, by analogy, that's equivalent to believing every website today could withstand a slashdotting. That we're in a better position today for such than in the past has more to do with big players taking oligarchy positions to provide a buffer for such issues. The equivalent in the healthcare world would be to have multi-state conglomerates of hospitals that would seek to include big and large hospitals alike and deal with all the costs/benefits of the group.

    6. Re:their own fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More evidence of Slashdot's horrible Ebola-culture!

    7. Re:their own fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't get AIDS from being sneezed on, but you can get Ebola that way though. Since you don't seem to know this key difference the government is obscuring via the weasely and deliberately misleading "bodily fluids" term, then YOU are also one of the "time bombs".

    8. Re:their own fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      We really didn't have the bandwidth to stream a CDC teleconference to all the hospitals in America but twitch.tv can stream a Starcraft championship to 200,000 people around the world in HD? Uh ok.

    9. Re:their own fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Please do not simplify such a grave topic.

      There are innumerable communicable diseases in the world, including the US. Many of these infectious diseases have very serious health consequences, also including those in the US. As such, there are numerous (and sometimes onerous) regulations put in place by the public and private sectors to educate and prepare those who are at the front line.

      The most basic form is something called universal precautions, which should be observed with EVERY patient you come in contact with. Essentially the goal is to treat every patient's bodily fluid as if it is contaminated, thereby protecting yourself from unknown diseases that the patient may have, and preventing spreading of nosocomial diseases to an otherwise healthy patient. If a patient is known to be infected, additional precautions are put in place in accordance with the communicability of the infection. These include everything from gowns and gloves, all the way to pressurized rooms, N95 respirators, and the so called "space suits". Used appropriately, these are excellent barriers to the spread of disease.

      I guarantee those involved with Mr. Duncan's care were certified in all of the above, and once diagnosed Mr. Duncan was almost certainly triaged appropriately. Additionally, the hospital should have ample stock of all of the above equipment -- it is used on a daily basis in the hospital with or without ebola. So the question becomes, how did subsequent infections occur. There must have been a breakdown somewhere in the above steps, whether it was the hospital providing faulty facilities, faulty precautionary equipment, or faulty usage of said equipment. YOU nor I can say nothing more -- we do not know where the blame lays. (Also, run through your mental exercises again keeping in mind that there were no infections in Atlanta or Nebraska, other sites that have taken care of ebola patients). Just take a deep breath and stay civil.

      Sauce: I am a doctor who has worked with the sickest of the sick here in the US. I have seen hospitals error, gloves break, and an incredible number of health care professionals misuse equipment and ignore precautions.

      As an aside, health care professionals are always at the front line of these things and always at risk of the worst. A very sizable number of physicians, if they are being honest, will admit to inadvertently sticking themselves with a dirty needle or scalpel (myself included). The risk of communicable diseases, very serious pathologies, are small but not inconsequential. I personally know doctors who have died form AIDS, and radiologists with myeloproliferative disorders. Do you remember the AIDS epidemic in the 1980's, especially before anyone knew the etiology? Where was the mass exodus in the 80s? With all the fear in society, physicians and health care professionals were still compelled to treat anyone sick. Despite this, from my anecdotal experience, more doctors are leaving medicine because of increasing litigation, oppressive malpractice laws and increasing malpractice insurance, rather than fears of communicable diseases.

      And a bit of advice: although the treatment of hepatitis and HIV have improved over the years (and very solid evidence that HIV is innately becoming less virulent, another interesting story in and of itself), I would recommend not sharing needles or playing with infected fluids of others.

    10. Re:their own fault by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      Body Substance Isolation. Seriously man, it's the first thing you learn. I'm only an EMT, but in any of our skills we were tested on, not calling out BSI was an automatic fail. I get that you're sympathetic to what they're trying to do, and they should be commended for it. But at what point are they negligent?

    11. Re:their own fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, i thought Ebola was much less virulent than HIV. You guys need to get your story straight - or not I guess, cuz I'm spinning.

    12. Re:their own fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A time bomb that went off before Ebola did. That hospital has previously been spanked by Medicare for a high rate of hospital-acquired infections.

      I'd guess the hospital administration has been cost-cutting by not having enough staff and/or equipment to keep things clean and under control. The nurses are the victims of this policy, not the perps.

    13. Re:their own fault by Solandri · · Score: 1

      These workers came into contact with the patient's bodily fluids.

      While that's literally true, what's far more likely to have happened is that the patient's bodily fluids came in contact with something that you normally wouldn't associate with bodily fluids, and these nurses came in contact with that (or with something else which came in contact with that). So until we learn exactly what the "breach of protocol" was, I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that it was the nurses' own fault. For all we know some staffer may have accidentally used saline solution instead of bleach to fill a spray bottle used for disinfecting.

    14. Re:their own fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was an impractical statistical deception, a long winded way of stating that ebola still hasn't killed as many as the flu or common cold. Honestly, taking an elevator with an ebola patient is significantly more dangerous than sharing an elevator with someone who has aids.

    15. Re:their own fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do the police, but compare what is typically considered acceptable procedure for a knife fight or car accident compared to the normal procedure for dealing with ebola - level four biocontainment.

    16. Re:their own fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We really didn't have the bandwidth to stream a CDC teleconference to all the hospitals in America...

      One, I'm pretty sure the CDC was doing a phone teleconference and not an online teleconference. Primarily because (1) it's a technology everyone knows and has ready access to without worry about ineptness or whatever getting in the way, (2) it's a two way medium to allow for question/answers in a very one-on-one approach, and (3) it's not meant to be a "all the hospitals in America" meeting because that quickly degenerates into chaos and/or a several hour/day conference as 500 difference hospitals ask subtly difference versions of the same question while not listening to the other 499 replies.

      ...but twitch.tv can stream a Starcraft championship to 200,000 people around the world in HD? Uh ok.

      One way. No different than the CDC's broadcast on TV. Really, apples to oranges comparing to the teleconference.

      PS - If you want to argue the CDC should have had a online stream with multiple curators to handle filtering out relevant questions (this is, after all, online, and anyone could claim to be a hospital and the press would undoubtedly like to ask a lot of "so, you're saying ebola is going to kill us all?" questions), then I don't inherently disagree. Except a lot of hospitals would (1) have missed the stream and (2) being too incompetent to actually get it working properly. Unless, you know, they hooked up with Twitch.tv for the streaming and the media to inform the public (and hope they get more hospital admins and not the millions of others who will ask "are we all going to die?" which will make question curation near impossible). But, yea, whatever.

    17. Re:their own fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, precisely do you think is "weasely and deliberately misleading" about the term "bodily fluids"? It accurately describes the transmission mechanism, and includes *all* known vectors: blood, saliva, urine, feces (which, admittedly most people don't think of as a 'fluid'), sweat, etc.

    18. Re:their own fault by Cramer · · Score: 1

      AIDS and hep transmission to health workers is non-zero in the US. And it's caused by careless handing of infectious material (i.e. needles 99% of the time.) Yes, ebola is far easier to contract, but its transmission is, likewise, entirely a case of carelessness.

    19. Re:their own fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are innumerable communicable diseases in the world, including the US.

      Finally! Yes, the macho, dick-waving, swaggering war-monster profiteers who are more than happy to sell buy and sell land, water, air, votes, bodies, lives, and souls has gone on too long. Increased awareness is a start but only just. Far more action is needed to negate centuries of systemic oppression and repression. This certainly isn't limited to the US nor is the US the worst among all categories but if we truly wished to lead by example, then we have work to do.

    20. Re:their own fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My impression is that "universal precautions" minimize risk for everything, including airborne transmissions, but are tedious to use. Consequently full adherence is only done after contamination plementation from a serious case.

    21. Re:their own fault by LienRag · · Score: 1

      (and very solid evidence that HIV is innately becoming less virulent, another interesting story in and of itself)

      Very interesting indeed.
      Could you share this evidence, preferably in a form understandable by someone who knows a bit of biology but is not a medical student?

  11. Surprised? by AqD · · Score: 0

    The sick ones face almost certain death yet they entered the area without even knowing how to cure it.

    When shit happens on spaceship and you don't know how to deal with it, you seal the gate between parts and forget it. That's how the rest would survive.

    1. Re:Surprised? by Wormsign · · Score: 1

      So you're saying we should seal off Texas?

    2. Re:Surprised? by AqD · · Score: 1

      No but you should have banned all travels from Africa long ago.

    3. Re:Surprised? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      No you idiot.

      Seal off Africa.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    4. Re:Surprised? by Wormsign · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's much easier. Good call!

    5. Re:Surprised? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      You do realize, for standard passenger travel, there is a system in place that keeps track of not only where someone starts, but where they travel to. A system that can be and is used to deny entry to persons you don't want in your country.

      Or are you under the impression I'm talking about a naval blockade of a continent?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    6. Re:Surprised? by Wormsign · · Score: 1

      "Seal off Africa" isn't exactly a detailed explanation. That could mean anything, hence you get sarcasm in response. Either way I think you are over-simplifying the problem.

    7. Re:Surprised? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Considering I replied to a post that snarked we should "seal off Texas", I didn't think I needed to write a thesis paper.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    8. Re:Surprised? by Wormsign · · Score: 1

      No but perhaps opening with an insult and a 3 word response that could mean anything, you shouldn't assume anyone would understand what you mean or care to try and work at it. Dick.

    9. Re:Surprised? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Go be butthurt somewhere else.

      You, with several others above, throw out a jab at a favorite whipping boy of the left, and act like only well thought out responses, with fully documented citations, are allowed.

      Have a nice day.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    10. Re:Surprised? by Wormsign · · Score: 1

      I was not aware that I "threw out a jab at a favorite whipping boy of the left". Wow, you read a lot into my post that I didn't say. And I am the one being butthurt? Please. I am sorry your clear penchant for assumptions is so strong. It must be exhausting to be so sensitive. The OP used a spaceship analogy about sealing off bad sections and the discussion is about events in Texas, so I was trying to see if that is really what they were calling for because I think that is ridiculous. No political implications involved nor insults meant toward Texas, but feel free to keep reaching and accusing others of being the butthurt ones.

  12. Seriously, the nurses have a point. by nimbius · · Score: 2

    Working as a nurse means making around 42k a year, and thats assuming you're an RN . Hospitals rely primarily on less educated LVN or licensed vocational nurses because theyre less expensive, with a handfull of RN's spread amongst the floors to handle more complex procedures or incidents and perform mentoring as necessary. a nurses hours are commonly quite random, and physicians are rarely consistent in their protocols with the RN or LVN especially when a major incident is being handled. Private hospitals can also be a pain in the ass as theyre run like a corporation and dont enjoy having to purchase advanced personal protective gear or endure visits from the CDC, a regulatory agency that might also stop to challenge their #1 or #2 status in some patient treatment service theyve plastered on every billboard in the state.

    another problem with private hospitals is with enough patient deaths and worker infections, the marketing perception of the for-profit healthcare facility changes from competent and caring to killing field. Hospitals themselves may become increasingly unwilling to actually treat ebola patients, instead opting for end of life and infectious quarantine management.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:Seriously, the nurses have a point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to one of the _great_ public hospitals run by the VA?

    2. Re:Seriously, the nurses have a point. by TechNeilogy · · Score: 1

      Yep, the problem is not in you *should* do, it's what you *have* to do to actually take care of people. Imagine being a programmer making half or less the effective hourly rate of other average engineers. Having to master dozens of APIs. Working 60 hours a week at random. Filling out paperwork in addition to engineering tasks.

      And if you code just one bug, you may be toast. Not the program, *you*, you're toast.

      That's what the nurses I know tell me their job is like.

      I'm sure there are incompetent nurses, but the working conditions tax the competence of even the best,

      --
      "The wisdom of the Patriarchs was that they *knew* they were fools." --Master Foo
    3. Re:Seriously, the nurses have a point. by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Informative

      Average is closer to $70k for an RN, which puts them in the to 15% of all wage earners in the US.

      The rest is true, though. It's a pretty hectic job, and corporations will look for any market advantage (LVNs, overworked residents, image over process, etc.).

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:Seriously, the nurses have a point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VA problems are being addressed (and the VA hospital here seems well enough run).

      Who is addressing problems in private hospitals?

    5. Re:Seriously, the nurses have a point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Average is closer to $70k for an RN, which puts them in the to 15% of all wage earners in the US.

      The rest is true, though. It's a pretty hectic job, and corporations will look for any market advantage (LVNs, overworked residents, image over process, etc.).

      And government-run healthcare is any better?

      Does the recent "waiting list" issues at the VA ring any bells?

      Got the balls to Google specifics about "Liverpool Care Pathway"?

    6. Re:Seriously, the nurses have a point. by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 0

      VA problems are being addressed only after dozens of veterans died.

      Why are you defending their actions?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    7. Re:Seriously, the nurses have a point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mother was an RN for decades and didn't get above $46k.

      Maybe the highest wage-earning RN's in administration or on special assignment, like part of a Neuro team or a helicopter team, but rank and file are often in the $35's in the midwest.

    8. Re:Seriously, the nurses have a point. by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Flamebait??

      I respond to someone who simply ignores the dozens of deaths at a 'non-private' hospital system, in a thread based on trashing the private hospital system.

      These deaths are egregious in several ways:
      1) They were purely for the profits of the hospital administrators, who got bonuses based on wait times.
      2) The patients were not terminal when they were being initially processed. It was only after being ignored for months, by a 'non-private' hospital, that their problems overcame them.
      3) The patients were the people who fought for their country, and sacrificed their good health. Many were from the era of the draft, and were forced to fight whether they wanted to or not.
      4) For their service, their own government allowed them to be ignored for others' profits. Even though the current president campaigned on this exact issue, it was forgotten once the election was over.

      For the record, it doesn't matter if the hospital if public or private. Incompetence and unprofessional work at all levels should be rooted out. Not buried or exposed simply for political games to support your own agenda.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    9. Re:Seriously, the nurses have a point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      End of life and infectious quarantine management is the only sane way to deal with a contagious disease that has >70% kill percentage. The only thing the nurses are to be blamed for is not walking out when asked to risk their lives for no good reason.

    10. Re:Seriously, the nurses have a point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's towards the high end for a RN's scale, with ER contract RNs making over six figures skewing the average. But you can only do that for a few years before you are fried to a crisp.

      Average is closer to $50k for a staff nurse. As a LPN working in a large city, I've made more than RNs working in small towns.

    11. Re:Seriously, the nurses have a point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but that's a shit comparison. Nurses don't have to design systems that perform arbitrary amounts of transformations on arbitrary amounts of data. They have to follow well-established procedures. The programmer analog of a nurse screwing up isn't a bug in the code, it's an email sent to the wrong recipient, which is much easier to avoid when you follow proper procedure. Still precarious, but by many orders of magnitude less than what you are suggesting.

      It seems that those procedures weren't made known in this case, however.

  13. If we can't rely on procedures with ONE patient.. by swb · · Score: 1

    ...what gives us any reason to believe that these procedures will work with more than one patient or even significantly more?

    If containment requires much more stringent procedures, facilities and protection than what was used in Dallas, it somehow seems even less reassuring because the more complex the protocol the harder it is to scale.

    I've never been worried about the disease so much as I have this kind mindset that seems to be promoted about how "hard" the disease is to spread "if you follow procedures". While true on paper, the reality seems to be different and I think a mindset trying to downplay risk, panic, etc has led to a dangerously lax attitude.

  14. Re:the end is now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i modded this funny, i'm assuming it's satire

  15. Race card by Aeros · · Score: 1

    So he has exposed two people (so far that we know) to this disease and they have a 70% chance of dieing...but thats should be fine because he is/was African. Seriously, STFU people. Race isn't an issue here. He was an idiot that was with an infected lady who died from ebola as well as other people that were around here that died as well. Then he decides to hope a plane and come to the US. Brilliant!

  16. Jurisdiction be damned by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

    The CDC should have been all over the hospital jurisdiction or no jursdiction. People's lives are on the line.

    It's quite evident that in the US there are people who can handle ebola. These people were not in Texas, and the stupid hospital admins did not realize that they needed the help. Regardless of that, it's been demonstrated that help has to be forced upon any hospital handling Ebola whether they like it or not.

    --PM

    1. Re:Jurisdiction be damned by tibit · · Score: 1

      IOW, according to you lawlessness is fine and dandy as long as "lives are on the line". Think of the children, too.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    2. Re:Jurisdiction be damned by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      That worked so well for the Dems who blamed Bush for not forcing FEMA into Louisiana immediately after Katrina hit.

      Why not use the same argument against the CDC?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    3. Re:Jurisdiction be damned by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      CDC Mission Statement:

      CDC works 24/7 to protect America from health, safety and security threats, both foreign and in the U.S. Whether diseases start at home or abroad, are chronic or acute, curable or preventable, human error or deliberate attack, CDC fights disease and supports communities and citizens to do the same.

      CDC increases the health security of our nation. As the nation’s health protection agency, CDC saves lives and protects people from health threats. To accomplish our mission, CDC conducts critical science and provides health information that protects our nation against expensive and dangerous health threats, and responds when these arise.

      I'm thinking someone was asleep on the job. The Response side of the equation was definitely lacking.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    4. Re:Jurisdiction be damned by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

      Why said anything about lawlessness? What *law* would stop a bunch of CDC experts from showing up at the hospital and saying to the admins, "Here we are, this is a very serious situation, and we've brought X and Y and Z resources to help. Let us help you please."

      I *know* that if I'm a hospital admin, and there are these guys in my office offering that class of help, I'm not going to be saying "no".

      So what laws would be broken, exactly? If the CDC offered that level of help (quite legally) and the hospital (also legally) told them to go take a hike, we'd know EXACTLY who to blame. Furthermore, the CDC would be on the spot in force able to cope with the screw up.

      --PM

    5. Re:Jurisdiction be damned by tibit · · Score: 1

      I don't read "CDC should be all over the hospital" the same as "hey, we've come to help, but feel free to turn us away".

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  17. These two patients are different. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    They contracted ebola in the USA. Which means these ebola viruses is natural born US Ebola viruses, invested with more constitutional rights than an alien undocumented ebola virus. So these viruses must be given their due process. So it would take longer to process them.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  18. At this rate by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    Why, everyone in America will die of Old Age before we get Ebola.

    Aboujt 1 /week. I think more people are killed by hammers than Ebola.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:At this rate by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unless you consider that we're doubling the number of cases every week, not increasing by 1. In which case we've got about 26 weeks left before the entire US population is infected or dead.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:At this rate by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      That's like saying New Jedi Religion is the fastest growing religion in America because it just went from one worshiper to two.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    3. Re:At this rate by jdunn14 · · Score: 1
    4. Re:At this rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if the infection rate in Africa moves to 80k/wk, we can assume import 30/wk via air travel.

  19. Re:Russians have a few drugs starting trails by pastafazou · · Score: 2

    Are these russian drugs Psilocybin based, or are they Lysergic acid dyethylamide based? If it's the first, the trails will be shorter, and the strength of other hallucinatory experiences won't be as intense.

  20. I'm just counting down the white people by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    If the Onion is right, I think we're still like 46 white people away from a cure.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:I'm just counting down the white people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could have sworn there was an experimental cure that was used on the guy who helped create it, back when he was first infected a couple months ago. Why aren't we using it on anyone else? I know it's untested, but even if it simultaneously causes every kind of cancer known to man after a year it would still beat dying to ebola right now. What are they waiting for?

    2. Re:I'm just counting down the white people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't want to get sued into oblivion by Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton if a black guy dies from it.

    3. Re:I'm just counting down the white people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what? Fuck that noise.

      First of all, it's a virus. The next viral disease for which there is an up'n'up cure will be among the first.

      Now let's suppose what you really meant was "cure or treatment or vaccine," which brings us to Second of all - well shit, the existence of multiple anti-Ebola (most of them more generally anti-RNA-virus) treatments under development in multiple first-world countries would seem to suggest that the Onion's article is a load of race-baiting bullshit.

      Or perhaps it means that the Whitey Cabal was genuinely caught off-gaurd by filoviruses and is scrambling to protect itself.

      Could go either way, really.

  21. Kurtz was right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exterminate the brutes.

  22. That's what you get for hiring Asian nurses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try hiring an American for once instead of some cheap ass Asian import.

  23. journalism is dead, capitalism killed it by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    It used to be back during the days when terrestrial broadcast television was king, that the FCC mandated that stations produce a certain % of public service programming. That's the reason we ever had television news reporting in the first place. Or educational kids shows that weren't just half-hour commercials for the latest toys and sugary breakfast cereals.

    Then we went to cable, which doesn't have the same regulation, removing the public service programming mandate. From that point everything was driven purely by the capitalistic profit motive.

    So instead of filling the multiple 24 hour news channels with thoughtful, in-depth reporting, we've got CNN screaming OMGWTF every five minutes trying to grab attention.

    See, the Invisible Hand makes everything better. Do not blaspheme the hand.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  24. This Hospital is in No Way Unique by Egg+Sniper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The failures of this hospital in dealing with a novel and gravely serious situation are in no way indicative of remarkably incompetent individuals or sub-standard hospital policies.

    Even the most complete training cannot provide experience. Day to day work in a hospital is boring and routine, and when faced with the unknown people are going to fall back on that routine, not what they were trained to do briefly and long ago. Nurses who haven't dealt much with explosive diarrhea or projectile vomiting won't have practice being meticulous about preventing splatter on every part of their skin or porous clothing. Simply telling someone to be careful and then sending them off unsupervised and unaided isn't terribly effective.

    Hospitals cannot afford to maintain a full wardrobe of gear to deal with even one Ebola patient throughout the course of treatment, nor are they set up to dispose of that gear at the rate it piles up after use. Adequate supplies will need to be provided on a reactive (not proactive) basis. Protocols, however, simply assume that the gear is there and ready to be used by people well versed in their use. It doesn't do any good to have well thought out procedures in place if it isn't possible or practical to implement them.

    People who blame the nurses, or the hospital, or the patient are holding them up to an unreasonable standard. These people are not special. They're not clowns and they're not villains. They're just normal folk reacting the way normal folk will, and neither the CDC nor anyone else has some magic wand to wave to prevent this exact same scenario from playing out the next time. It's unfortunate, but it is manageable and we should focus on making sure the right lessons are learned from it.

    Some interesting viewing, somewhat related: http://www.ted.com/talks/atul_... http://thedailyshow.cc.com/vid...

    1. Re:This Hospital is in No Way Unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nurses who haven't dealt much with explosive diarrhea or projectile vomiting won't have practice being meticulous about preventing splatter on every part of their skin or porous clothing.

      I'd like you to find one nurse in the U.S. with more than a year's experience who has not had experience with explosive diarrhea and projectile vomiting. It would be an odd nurse who didn't get that during training.

      Infection control procedures can handle that. The same procedures should have been able to handle this. The question is 'Why not?'.

      There are two possible answers to that question. One is that standard infection control cannot handle Ebola (which would be quite unusual, as there are a lot of other diseases which are more highly infectious (ie: airborne small droplet vector, things like tuberculosis (?)) for which infection control works perfectly fine. The other answer is that standard infection control protocols were not performed.

      tl;dr: Unless that Texas hospital had a culture of following standard infection control prior to this event, you should expect more cases to crop up.

    2. Re:This Hospital is in No Way Unique by steelfood · · Score: 1

      In this case, the idiot up and went to Ohio to plan a wedding knowing full well there's still a chance of having contracted the disease. If more cases stem from this, I think you very wll can find someone to blame.

      And I'm pretty sure she won't be the only one. The people on the plane with her are going to continue with their daily lives as if nothing's happened. They should be strictly quarrantined for three weeks, but instead, they're going to to back to Ohio or go onto wherever they're supposed to go (and back maybe), and in three weeks, we'll be real lucky if there are no more cases.

      This is getting more and more serious, but the government's attitude continues to be lackadasical. At this point, at-risk people shouldn't even be allowed to go outdoors. Keep them quarrantined: give them food and water, and compensate for whatever loss they might incur once this all blows over, assuming that it will.

      A disproportionate response is the only thing that will stop an outbreak here. A reasonable, measured, adequate response will ultimately result in a much higher body count.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  25. good advice in general by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Avoid people projectile vomiting or with explosive diarrhea .
    And Texas Presbyterian hospital.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:good advice in general by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      I'm avoiding both Presbyterians and Texans. In fact, I avoid both Americas and all kinds of churches like the plague^H^H^H^H^H^HEbola.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  26. Just tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not yet. It is not good news that a second doctor/nurse got ebola considering we are being told it is not easy to get ebola. It will be if others outside the hospital workers get ebola. Was not a perfect seal suits, but it shows it not as hard to get as they are saying it is.

    I would set it to "worry" state until there have been no new cases for..... 3 weeks? or however long it takes to show the signs of ebola in new people. And that would only be for the Dallas area.

  27. Again, with the beta version when I chose classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is it with you idjits?
    Have you decided to cater to the t-boppers (script-kiddies) exclusively? This method of beta-pushing is stupid, and will alienate any of us who have a lawn.
    Here's the deal: When someone chooses "Classic", the server should serve the classic slashdot, irregardless of the
    pressures from the new owners, advertisers, or federales.
    The classic view, when chosen, should display ALL classic: comments, topics and such, NOT the F^&#@%! BETA!

    Now, get off my lawn and put Coke in a bottle.

  28. RIch people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If it turns into a real mess, all it would take is Rich people fearing for their own lives to put up the money to start mass producing this drug. Also, it appears the Russians have a few drugs starting trails as well."

    Isn't it the job of the federal gob't to pony up the money in cases like this when it's a public health issue, and a potential national security issue? Is this not what we pay taxes for?

    God knows they spend money on all kinds of less minor crap.

    1. Re:RIch people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If it turns into a real mess, all it would take is Rich people fearing for their own lives to put up the money to start mass producing this drug. Also, it appears the Russians have a few drugs starting trails as well."

      Isn't it the job of the federal gob't to pony up the money in cases like this when it's a public health issue, and a potential national security issue? Is this not what we pay taxes for?

      God knows they spend money on all kinds of less minor crap.

      Yes, but Texans don't seem to believe in federal government. In fact, texans have been wanting to secede for awhile now. I say now is the time we let them do it. Then immediately put a travel ban in place between the rest of the country and the newly instituted "United States of Caucasia".

    2. Re: RIch people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the virus is on the money

  29. Given how long it took them to gain statehood... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the BS involved, I've been wondering for years why they'd *WANT* to be in the US.

    They aren't called the 'Lone Star State' without reason. If you really don't know why, you might want to go read up on the Alamo and the surrounding situations that prevented them from immediate statehood or at least military support when they requested it. Another example of our bureaucracy at its finest.

    That said the Texas of the 80s and before was a much more colorful place than it is now. A lot more rebellious too (I have multiple family in the southern parts of the state who will vouch about the sheriffs being suspicious of you if you DIDN'T have an open container in the vehicle, and various similar shenanigans.)

  30. NO by sycodon · · Score: 0

    It's called an irresponsible Administration allowing people from countries with active Ebola outbreaks to waltz on into the U.S. as if they were going to Disney World. Basic flight restrictions should have been in place since the beginning of the outbreaks.

    Hospitals in the U.S. have had little training in such virulent diseases and very few have the high level isolation units and gear required to prevent further infections.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:NO by suutar · · Score: 1

      They were. The guy lied on his paperwork. Had he survived he would have been facing criminal charges in two countries for that.

    2. Re:NO by cptdondo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh fer crying out loud. What do you want, Obama personally doing body cavity searches at the border? If he did that people like you (or others) would be screaming about an "irresponsible Administration" destroying businesses or trampling on your rights or whatever.

      You CAN'T quarantine this. Those people are coming through Amsterdam or Frankfurt or Paris or London. Are you going to close all the borders?

    3. Re:NO by sycodon · · Score: 1

      He should not have been able to get here in the first place.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    4. Re:NO by suutar · · Score: 1

      How would you implement a system to prevent it? Preferably without completely blocking all traffic from Liberia to the rest of the world, because there's a fair number of foreigners there who will want to come home someday, and (at the time of this particular incident) no cases outside of Africa have been seen yet.

    5. Re:NO by Wookact · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They have passports correct? Well you should be able to easily see they have recently come from West Africa. If they don't have a passport WTH are you doing letting them in?

    6. Re:NO by Slim_Jack · · Score: 1

      Anyone who has been in a country with Ebola outbreak (the passport agent reviews the passport) should have their thumbs dyed (airbrush stamp) the way they do in third world countries for voting. If such a person came in to the ER after landing, the doctor immediately knows to wet their pants and put on the rubber gloves. The dye takes about a week to wear off.

    7. Re:NO by suutar · · Score: 1

      Not a bad idea. I like it. Doesn't address GP's assertion that "he shouldn't have been able to get here", but it seems more feasible than anything that I can think of that would address that.

    8. Re:NO by SydShamino · · Score: 2
      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    9. Re:NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So every American flying to another country needs the finger to be dyed?
      Think, do you even?

    10. Re:NO by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Just because a there is no 100% solution is no excuse for not making the effort. I'd rather prevent 80% of potentially infected people be blocked than 0%. Restrictions on commercial flights is a common sense solution until the outbreak in those countries is dealt with.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    11. Re:NO by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Blocking direct commercial traffic would go a long way towards preventing cases from flying in. Forcing people to tak connecting flights from some other country would not only lengthen their trip and therefore increase the chance they start showing symptoms, but they would also go through multiple screenings.

      There is no good reason to allow direct flights from infected countries.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    12. Re:NO by sycodon · · Score: 1

      What sick and twisted reasoning are people using to claims that restricting travel in the face of epidemic won't work? Sure, it won't help 100% of the time, but it will , the author's own admission, reduce risks for the U.S. by 50% for a while. That is better than nothing.

      I suspect it has some kind of political correctness thing involved or some geopolitical maneuvering.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    13. Re:NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that country has a major Ebola outbreak then yes on their return it makes sense. Should even do it to people who flew on the same plane with the 2nd Ebola nurse from Cleveland

    14. Re:NO by sexconker · · Score: 1

      How would you implement a system to prevent it? Preferably without completely blocking all traffic from Liberia to the rest of the world, because there's a fair number of foreigners there who will want to come home someday, and (at the time of this particular incident) no cases outside of Africa have been seen yet.

      Block all traffic from Liberia to the rest of the world. Allow exceptions only after a 21-day quarantine.
      You can't have your cake and eat it, too. If you want to maintain a quarantine you have to maintain a quarantine.

    15. Re:NO by Steve+Blake · · Score: 1

      Once the first flight attendant or pilot flying out of W. Africa contracts Ebola, air travel there will stop.

    16. Re:NO by steelfood · · Score: 1

      You can't quarrantine international flights. But you can quarrantine Dallas. Or the hospital. Or the hospital workers who've provided care to Duncan specifically. Or hell, just ground all flights, which they're going to have to do if this gets any more out of control.

      This person should not have been allowed to fly. We already have a no-fly list. It's not managed well because of its secrecy and difficulty of getting off, but if there ever was a time it was appropriate to use a list to prohibit people from traveling, that would be now.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    17. Re:NO by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Um, if the guy leaves Liberia for somewhere else by other form of transportation, who's going to dye the thumb? Also, if the dye wears off after a week, that's not real useful, since the asymptomatic period can be considerably longer than that.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    18. Re:NO by Slim_Jack · · Score: 1

      Hey it's a start -- at least it gives the medical professionals some clue before they go up and start kissing on the patient

    19. Re: NO by cptdondo · · Score: 1

      I carry 2 passports. I use one to enter the US and one to enter the EU. How will you stop me?

    20. Re:NO by dywolf · · Score: 1

      it wont work, so lets do it anyway!

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    21. Re:NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the comments (and hints in the beginning of the article about how "selfish" he thinks a travel band is,) you'll quickly see that the author believes very strongly that quarantine is highly immoral and unethical, and this strong bias he has is clearly tainting his fraudulent theory and bogus results.

      He also tries to employ the utopia fallacy. We "can't stop the spread 100%" therefore we shouldn't try (Also it's unethical and selfish and racist).

      It is purely speculative and ridiculous that the virus would spread MORE because of a travel band.

      The notion that we should just let people travel because it's better to be able to track them is stupid. We don't WANT to track the spread of a disease, we want to STOP the spread. Letting a disease spread because you think quarantine is unethical is truly the unethical leftist stance.

  31. Mathematics not politics by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 1

    The mathematics of the problem of Ebola propagation are clear. So are reasonable responses to limit propagation chances. But we let politics decide against science. Who are the science-deniers now?

    http://pjmedia.com/richardfern...

  32. not unexpected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "second infection among the 70+ medical professionals who were around Duncan is not unexpected"

    But if every infection were to lead to someone having 70+ medical professionals around them, and each of these results in two more cases then you soon have exponential growth.

    The only way to reduce the spread is for each infected person to infect on average fewer than one person.

  33. No, not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Navy seals and other properly trained soldiers get shot, blown up, drowned, captured, etc. It's not necessarily their fault for not doing what they were trained to do, it's just that sometimes all the training in the world won't help. Hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, tornadoes, and simple stormy weather take lives every despite people doing everything right. Vegan marathon runners still get heart attacks and cancers. These nurses have not contracted the illness due to police academy level negligence, they were overcome by events, period - end of story. And they deserve your respect and admiration for risking their lives in the attempt to save one and prevent many others from falling to the same fate.

    Your flippant condemnation strikes me as the arrogance of politicos whose greatest risk to life in many many years has always been the daily commute, yet still find ways to hang honest heros out to dry.

  34. "seems to have brought the virus" by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

    Not "seems", but "confirmed". Let's not sugar coat this.

  35. How's that free market working for y'all? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    I've just got to think that doing whatever to get folks ramped up would be easier with a nationalized health care system, if for no other reason than that checking for training compliance would be easier without needing to traverse the unholy, interlocking mess of hospitals, care homes, independent practitioners, practice groups, independent contractors, and associated hangers on that currently provide the "first responders" to this emergency.
    Free marketeers couldn't have shot themselves in the foot better if they tried. The only problem is that they shot all of you in the foot at the same time. And none of this "the market isn't completely free" crap argument either - we theoretically have a more "free" market than just about any other country in the world. How is this "freedom" helping during this emergency? Because, as of now, all I see is that disseminating training, tracking providers and patients, and doing anything useful clinically has been made about a bazillion times more complicated by this vaunted "freedom".

    --
    That is all.
    1. Re:How's that free market working for y'all? by Slim_Jack · · Score: 1

      You like to build a 'strawman' to attack - American Medicine is not 'free market' - it is CYA, follow expensive procedures so you do not get sued by Trial Lawyers to the tune of millions of dollars in jury courts that look at rich doctors and hospitals as unbounded sources of $$$, while Medicare, Medicaid and the insurance companies pony up thousands for unnecessary procedures that the doctors employ for the same CYA. Insinuating that the 'free market' failed Duncan et al when he had (despite being a non-citizen) a doctor visit, and an expensive CT scan (take a look at an American bill for that sometime), a standard operating CYA procedure in our pre (and post) Obamacare environment is just another political fantasy that has ruined how many American lives?

  36. Luulllzz " humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....We are soo fucked......and soo many people are oblivious to the real state of things.....

    First off Ebola is not the one that will wipe out humanity, IMHO....There will be a large number of deaths, mostly in Africa, but it will burn itself out.

    There is no way any nation is ready or able to contain an outbreak (of ebola or anything else for that matter), but we are lucky enough that Ebola is not as easily transmissible as the flu. Now something such as avian flu is a real cause for concern.....

    If H5N1 evolves to allow human to human transmission we are in serious trouble (60% mortality rate).

    In any case, whatever the next big pandemic will be is irrelevant. What is relevant is the lies all governments spread about being ready for x y or z. Which is total and utter BS they spread as to reassure the cattle (us) so there is no widespread panic. No medical system in the world is capable of coping with MILLIONS upon MILLIONS of patients all getting sick within a short time frame. Talks of isolation and quarantine are also full of shit as the SARS outbreak has shown us, as H1N1 and now Ebola....they cannot contain shit (and think about it logically, how could they unless they tracked each and every single human being on the planet). They want you to believe you are being kept safe, that your tax money is being spent on protecting you.....Truth is the only reason we have not had a major pandemic since 1918 (with a high mortality %) is........luck......Not our advanced medical tech`, not government planning and management, none of that...just plain dumb luck......

  37. C 'ing the truth by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

    IV treatment IV vitamin C with sodium ascorbate is a powerful, less known antiviral treatment, stonewalled out of conventional medicine for ca 75 years http://seanet.com/~alexs/ascor... .... See also
    Injectable C http://injectablevitaminc.com/...
    Cathcart http://orthomolecular.org/libr...
    and Klenner. http://www.doctoryourself.com/...
    or read Tom Levy's book, Curing the Incurable:Vitamin C, Infectious Diseases, and Toxins

    The more severe the virus, higher and more frequent doses used. As support for nasty viral illnesses overseas that have no vaccine, we also take zinc, 50,000 iu of vitamin D3 for 1-2 weeks, lysine and 200-400 mcg selenium. With Ebola, the real question will be when the last chance for a given level of IV vitamin C treatment (gram C/kg wt) 2-3-4 times per day will work, and when it will be too late - too little.

    I've already been in a 3rd world situation where people look like over made actors in a sci fi movie with lots and lots of big pustules...and IV vitamin C worked well from the first infusion crusting over in ~8 hours vs 8 more days, over it in several days, so don't yak at me about iffy imagination stuff. However, I believe ignorance and cupidity are mankind's norm.

    1. Re:C 'ing the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go home, Linus Pauling, you're drunk.

    2. Re:C 'ing the truth by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

      You are a Darwin Award in the making.

  38. Protocol for caring of EBOLA patients apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see:

    * allocate 70+ people to care for one patient
    * no hazmat suits

    *after daily caregiving of an extremely contagious and deadly person,
      _ go home (too costly to keep the nurses separate for a few weeks)
      _ kiss kids good night on the lips (hospital would not pay for childcare, nor would CDC, and the nurse is too uninformed/lax to care)
      _ have sex with husband/wife/boyfriend/girlfriend (OMG cannot wait a few weeks0
      _ fly around the country on an urgent matter (of course one cannot be contagious unless you are feverish vomiting pooping all over, right? the problem is that the virus does not know that)
      _ use public bathroom, aircraft bathroom etc.
      _ kiss your mom/sis/niece/nephew when you visit family cross country

    Dunno about the first nurse, but the second nurse was especially careless. What on earth was she thinking? Could she hve not waited 21 days or more givne the gravity of the situation? Could the frigging beancounters at the hospital have somehow made an environment possible to limit contact with the patiend and keep the nurses as much possible on self-imposed separation for a few weeks?

    IDIOTS.

  39. How's that free market working for y'all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope.....nationalized != Gov running every hospital, managing every doctor/orderly/etc.....At least not in first world countries.

    It's just a single payer.....everything else is run in a similar fashion......

    Cuba and some others might be a little different not sure......

  40. not unexpected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are absolutely correct. What they are not telling us is basically with a few infections here & there, it will quickly overwhelm our resources to track people suspected of being exposed to the virus. Also the long incubation period ( so far been observed to be between 2-21 days) means you have to track people for a long time (42 days to be safe) before you can clear them as Ebola free....

    Good thing Ebola is not endemic to the Western World.....

  41. Re:Protocol for caring of EBOLA patients apparentl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If containing the ebola outbreak depends on the average american not behaving like an idiot then we are all dead meat.

    I work in education at an institution that feeds into the nursing pipeline and oh boy these people are stupid, lazy and full of excuses.

  42. Sick Leave Bonanza by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Airport airline cleaners will be the first group to CASH in on the coming sick leave bull market.

  43. Deadlier Than Ebola by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obomber. Just ask [insert target du jour here].

  44. Infected Are L-M Income Democrats: PANIC TIME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big O just got the word: the Ebola pandemic is hitting low-middle income democrats and three weeks to the election!

    Serious panic time mode for Big O now. By November 4 there will be 4 million democratic voters sick and soon dead. Projections call the election outcome a Republican victory and the next Presidential election a cake walk for Republicans.

    Tough time for Big O.

    1. Re:Infected Are L-M Income Democrats: PANIC TIME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the Democrats have to do is remind voters of Republican's regular votes to defund the CDC and NIH. Would you rather have a bunch of esteemed doctors from Boston, NYC and DC in charge of containing a modern day plague or a bunch of bumbling hicks from Dallas?

  45. Re:Protocol for caring of EBOLA patients apparentl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the fuck aren't all the people exposed to Duncan on the god damned no fly list? Can someone explain this shit?

  46. Now I can panic! by Prien715 · · Score: 1

    Thank you Overzeetop! I was looking for a reason to go into all-out-panic mode, grab my family, some shotgun shells, and head to the hills!

    My family thinks I'm crazy, but if you're right, we'll all be dead before the 4th of July! DOOMED!!!!! REPENT SINNERS!!!!! ::Goes off to take medication::

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  47. I believe it's at least $1000 around here by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    which is why they probably did it. Can't have a spendy machine like that just lying around not making money.

  48. Oh, please... by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    we all know that if he did anything like that you would be complaining about how the scary black democrat was acting like a dictator.

  49. Um, flu has no problem by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    killing healthy people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...

  50. Good by gelfling · · Score: 1

    We need a good plague. Let's get on with it.

  51. andromeda strain suits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever happened to the cute doctor and nurse suites they used in the andromeda strain movie?

    They provided a barrier between clean and contaminated sides that was always there.
    None of this risk of touching the contaminated side while taking the suit.

  52. Virus burn out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on the modeling done so far (which is tracking with, and predicting the spread in Africa quite well) it will likely start to 'burn out' in December.

    http://motherboard.vice.com/read/this-math-model-is-predicting-the-ebola-outbreak-with-incredible-accuracy

  53. Re:Infected Are L-M Income Democrats: PANIC TIME - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullocks - the hospital poured thousands of $$ at Duncan (CT Scan, doctor visit etc) - then the CDC was made aware of it, and now, _after_ a nurse has flown to Cleveland, the CDC mandatorily requires the nurses not to fly during quarantine? They had the power to quarantine all the time, but the leaders of the CDC and the President (The Democrats) flubbed it and did poor emergency management. How many people have been exposed to Ebola now from that Cleveland to Dallas flight when the CDC could have taken the rational action earlier? Why is everything happening _after the fact_ with the CDC leader and President Obama?

  54. Nurses not to blame by CensorshipDonkey · · Score: 1

    The hospital admins are most likely to blame, not the poor nurses who were thrust into a life-threatening situation with inadequate resources and support: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/nu...

  55. Alarm does not equal panic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right now the CDC's best case scenario for West Africa is 11,000 to 27,000 cases by Jan. 20 and worst case is 537,000 to 1,367,000 cases through January 20... With a mortality rate over 50% and probably closer to 70% that doesn't even begin to address the devastating effects that it is having on the economy. Preventing either kind of scenario from happening in the US should be a very very high priority. Alarm is warranted.

  56. What economy have YOU been in? by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

    People are lining up to get ANY job. The 1% isn't leaving as many crumbs for the poor and middle class as they used to!

    --PM

    1. Re:What economy have YOU been in? by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      No. This was true 10 years ago as well. And this 1% nonsense is tiring. It's boring and it's stupid. You're worried about the control of the 1% - then get away from government control of the economy. You worry about some having more than you. Right? Ohh the humanity. We're not all equal. So what do you do? You get the government to get back at them to force equality. But it doesn't work that way. And then you're surprised that they protect themselves, do jujitsu and use the government to their advantage? The solution is to not use the government to enforce equality - else as in the soviet union (and ever so evident here in the US) people who have the government on their side get the plums - and the rest don't. To paraphrase Orwell - some pigs are more equal than others.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    2. Re:What economy have YOU been in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What you've done here is called attacking a straw man.

      Let's just run way back with it. Nobody (to within experimental error) is worried about person A having more than person B. They are worried about person B being completely unable to have *enough*, even if person B is by all objective measures better than person A.

      This is also exactly what you're worried about. You just name your boogeyman "the government" instead of "the 1%". It's just as tiresome.

    3. Re:What economy have YOU been in? by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1
      No. There are a lot of people who are philosophically opposed to there unequality of wealth. I speak with them everyday; there are some in my family.

      Equality of outcome is desired by many. My point made about the 1% is that too many people are saying that everything bad happens because of the EVIL 1% who control the world. If only, they say, this 1% would pay their "fair share" and government agencies ran everything then the world would be wonderful.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  57. The flu might kill more people this year by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

    But by next year Ebola,if not brought under control, will be one of the top 10 causes of death worldwide.

    --PM

  58. Remember your cardio... by zawarski · · Score: 0

    ..don't be a hero and always double-tap.

  59. Uh Oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama was counting on his airport quarantines and delay terror tactics to attack middle-upper income Whites.

    Now it appears that Ebola will attack low-to-middle income Black and Latinos, the core of the Democratic party, to the extent of 3 million sick and dead by November 4 (election day).

    So, there goes the election to the Republicans (Senate control) as well as the next Presidential election (Republican President).

    Obama should have left well enough alone.

  60. Third Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found this video discussing another event that happened on a Delta flight today.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOI4ReOiK4E

  61. What are they doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hospital workers aren't trained to deal with infectious agents?

    What exactly are they trained for?

  62. What is really embarrassing for you by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    is that your pathetic little rant was probably the best you could do.

  63. That's what you get for hiring Asian nurses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect it was the American hiring that was the problem

  64. If you like your Ebola, you can keep your Ebola by Squidlips · · Score: 1

    It is part of the Obamcare package..[M. Savage] So did it really cost $500,000 to treat Patient 0?

  65. did they touch money in their fevered state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    face it folks, the virus is going to be all over the money supply

  66. And nurses are cleaner than doctors. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Studies of infection control discipline that compare nursing staff to doctors show that nurses are more hygienic than doctors. So how incompetent were these women, or how wrong have our assumptions about this virus' transmission been?

    I wonder if the patient can be injected with large amounts of non-toxic fluorescent dye and UV lights be fitted to the periphery of the treatment areas to better detect contamination transfer? Ideally the dye would be antibody linked to have it bind to the virus surface preferentially.

    d@3-e.net

  67. journalism is dead, capitalism killed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Capitalism does not always work, but central planning does not work all the time either. There needs to be a give and take.

  68. Why Not? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Why Not?

    Extraordinary means require justification. So far we've killed 3 people. I think 3 people died in motor vehicle accidents while I typed this. You should never again be allowed to drive. It's too dangerous.

  69. Too soon for Americans, anyway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing that Americans need to remember is that these cases are still isolated to Texas. Wait until it reach the United States before you start to worry.

  70. addmehits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.addmehits.com