I defied you to find a contradiction, you failed to find one.
I knew you were lying and so did you.
"It's something called a fact, and your continued denial of reality has been the entire point this whole time"
"It's something called a fact,"
Wait something that subjective, that you think women look like men, is a fact? Wow, not only are you a liar, you're too stupid to look up the definition of fact and use the word correctly.
So now I caught you lying again.
And why is it your kind always calls troll while knee-deep in their obvious trolling effort?
I own you. And you know it, and now you're inches from a tantrum because you can't do a fucking thing about it.
But you keep telling yourself that it's a fact that women look like men, and it's not something off with you. The rest of us will do what we can not to burst your sad little bubble, while covertly laughing at your self loathing.
"Either way, it's been fun; watching as you try to convince yourself that just because I didn't make the same choices you would have, I must somehow be lying."
No, you're lying because you said something that's not true. How stupid are you?
"But I'm not the one that's had to resort to name calling, personal attacks and baseless assumptions to get their point across."
Neither did I. I got my point across without any of that, but you continued to argue the same stupid points, so I gave up and descended to your level. I agree, I should have taken the high road and continued to destroy your points instead of drawing attention to your intellectual deficiencies.
"The reason for bringing up the Nuremberg defense in a discussion like this is to draw an analogy between it and the "just doing my job" argument"
WHich is moronic, because one is a case of horrendous war crimes and the other is refusing to allow a phone in a private usiness. One case has the individuals dragged screaming to their incineration, and one has people voluntarily choosing to enter a private establishment.
"Can you argue with/that/?"
If by argue, you mean completely destroy, then yeah, I completely destroyed that.
"There's no reason to think that comparison isn't valid,"
That's funny, I just gave you one. Seems you're wrong.
"So, would you like to explain how I'm completely wrong?"
I did, but does it really matter? You won't admit it, no matte how many ways I show you your point is absurd. Your kind never does. r
"Do you go "dipping unprotected in a bar slut" or do you wear a condom? If you do, doesn't that, by your own definition make you a coward too?"
No, it makes me reasonable. I never said one had to be reckless, but avoiding an activity because of a ridiculously small risk is cowardice. How are you so stupid that you think this makes sense?
I also notice that I destroyed your moronic analogy, which you completely avoided admitting. We both know it's becaue you can't argue with my analogy, and you know I'm right. That's why you resort to stupid "doesn't that make you a coward" games while fully aware that your point is stupid, and just as easily destroyed.
"Also, I don't appreciate being called "dumb" just because you failed to grasp my comment regarding my niece had nothing to do with the overall theme of sex in this article but was instead directed squarely to your comment of "You can be afraid of statistically tiny risks if you want, the rest of us aren't possessed by profound cowardice.""
No moron, you're dumb because you're comparing apples and oranges. I grasped everything about your point, and it was idiotic. You just failed to acknowledge that MY point was more valid, and completely moots the argument you made. If you fail to grasp why my point makes your argument moot, then you are as stupid as I've portrayed you.
I really can't see how there's anything more to say, you have yet to come up with a decent argument that I haven't smashed to bits, and now you're just repeating the same refuted points.
I won, get on with your pathetic cowardly existence.
"Since I've considered the pros and cons to make an informed choice and not have random sex, it must somehow mean I haven't had ample opportunity to do so?"
Yeah pretty much.
"Of course, you'd be wrong."
You can say that, but we both know the truth, so save it.
"You never actually admitted you like thin, mannish women."
So you're a liar. 'Nuff said.
"You simply refuse to admit that flat-chested, narrow-hipped women look like members of the flat-chested, narrow-hipped male gender."
NO liar, I refuse to admit that they look like men and not thin women. YOU are the one insisting they look like men, so why are you trying to assign your point to me? Telling me I think something won't make me think it, no matter how many times you try.
"I'm sure catching me in an unsupported inference"
It's called lying. I caught you lying, no surprise you'd downplay it.
"will completely make up for being caught in an absurd contradiction yourself, at least in your petty mind."
There is no contradiction, and I defy you to find one liar. I just caught you lying again. I have been consistent with my point throughout, while you have resorted to lying, which you do again here.
I have destroyed you, your moronic point, and your credibility liar. Now go ahead and deny it, while failing to post any "contradiction" once again proving that you'll lie in whatever way necessary to advance your argument.
"in civilised societies the judge decides the punishment without reference to the wishes of the prosecutor."
Bullshit. You're telling me the prosecutor's opinion isn't taken into consideration at all, even in cases where, say, the defendant gives the prosecutor helpful information on a more important criminal? Lie.
It's pretty clear that you know you're wrong, otherwise you wouldn't have had to lie to advance your point.
"The sentence meted out should be mostly based on the magnitude of the crime, and only slightly modified for wether someone pleaded guilty or not"
This is silly. It is the judge that sentences, so it IS based on the magnitude of the crime, so your objection is specious. The only thing that differs is what the prosecutor asks for, and this can vary for any number of reasons, including your willingness to cooperate and admit guilt.
"By giving someone a reward for letting you skip the due process, you're implying that somehow the due process is an inconvenient chore that we should try to do away with."
You're not rewarding them for "skipping due process" as a plea bargain IS due process. It's just one form of due process, that you are in no way required to accept.
Oh right, rather than argue the issue, which you have no argument for, you change the argument.
You going to the park with your niece = wearing a condom. No one ever said anything about dipping unprotected in a bar slut, so save the inappropriate analogies for someone dumb enough to accept them like you did.
So, would you prevent your niece from going with you to the park because the risk exists that she'll be abducted?
Well one of us made a veiled attempt to equate taking cellphones with war crimes (that would be you) and one of us called that comparison into question (that would be me).
If you're genuinely thick enough to think the comparison is valid, then you're not worth talking to.
"Right after you go fuck yourself."
Done! Your turn, I have full faith you'll follow through with our agreement.
Slashdot Mirror
I defied you to find a contradiction, you failed to find one. I knew you were lying and so did you. "It's something called a fact, and your continued denial of reality has been the entire point this whole time" "It's something called a fact," Wait something that subjective, that you think women look like men, is a fact? Wow, not only are you a liar, you're too stupid to look up the definition of fact and use the word correctly. So now I caught you lying again. And why is it your kind always calls troll while knee-deep in their obvious trolling effort? I own you. And you know it, and now you're inches from a tantrum because you can't do a fucking thing about it. But you keep telling yourself that it's a fact that women look like men, and it's not something off with you. The rest of us will do what we can not to burst your sad little bubble, while covertly laughing at your self loathing.
"I'm lying."
Fixed that for you.
"Either way, it's been fun; watching as you try to convince yourself that just because I didn't make the same choices you would have, I must somehow be lying."
No, you're lying because you said something that's not true. How stupid are you?
I caught you. Stop pretending otherwise.
"if that makes me a profound coward, so be it"
Then it be.
"But I'm not the one that's had to resort to name calling, personal attacks and baseless assumptions to get their point across."
Neither did I. I got my point across without any of that, but you continued to argue the same stupid points, so I gave up and descended to your level. I agree, I should have taken the high road and continued to destroy your points instead of drawing attention to your intellectual deficiencies.
Mea Culpa.
"Its called observation, check it out."
Why doesn't it surprise me that you'd justify your prejudice as valid, while simultaneously denouncing other's prejudices.
It's called being a hypocrite, check it out.
"The reason for bringing up the Nuremberg defense in a discussion like this is to draw an analogy between it and the "just doing my job" argument"
/that/?"
WHich is moronic, because one is a case of horrendous war crimes and the other is refusing to allow a phone in a private usiness. One case has the individuals dragged screaming to their incineration, and one has people voluntarily choosing to enter a private establishment.
"Can you argue with
If by argue, you mean completely destroy, then yeah, I completely destroyed that.
"There's no reason to think that comparison isn't valid,"
That's funny, I just gave you one. Seems you're wrong.
"So, would you like to explain how I'm completely wrong?"
I did, but does it really matter? You won't admit it, no matte how many ways I show you your point is absurd. Your kind never does.
r
"Do you go "dipping unprotected in a bar slut" or do you wear a condom? If you do, doesn't that, by your own definition make you a coward too?"
No, it makes me reasonable. I never said one had to be reckless, but avoiding an activity because of a ridiculously small risk is cowardice. How are you so stupid that you think this makes sense?
I also notice that I destroyed your moronic analogy, which you completely avoided admitting. We both know it's becaue you can't argue with my analogy, and you know I'm right. That's why you resort to stupid "doesn't that make you a coward" games while fully aware that your point is stupid, and just as easily destroyed.
"Also, I don't appreciate being called "dumb" just because you failed to grasp my comment regarding my niece had nothing to do with the overall theme of sex in this article but was instead directed squarely to your comment of "You can be afraid of statistically tiny risks if you want, the rest of us aren't possessed by profound cowardice.""
No moron, you're dumb because you're comparing apples and oranges. I grasped everything about your point, and it was idiotic. You just failed to acknowledge that MY point was more valid, and completely moots the argument you made. If you fail to grasp why my point makes your argument moot, then you are as stupid as I've portrayed you.
I really can't see how there's anything more to say, you have yet to come up with a decent argument that I haven't smashed to bits, and now you're just repeating the same refuted points.
I won, get on with your pathetic cowardly existence.
"Since I've considered the pros and cons to make an informed choice and not have random sex, it must somehow mean I haven't had ample opportunity to do so?"
Yeah pretty much.
"Of course, you'd be wrong."
You can say that, but we both know the truth, so save it.
"You never actually admitted you like thin, mannish women."
So you're a liar. 'Nuff said.
"You simply refuse to admit that flat-chested, narrow-hipped women look like members of the flat-chested, narrow-hipped male gender."
NO liar, I refuse to admit that they look like men and not thin women. YOU are the one insisting they look like men, so why are you trying to assign your point to me? Telling me I think something won't make me think it, no matter how many times you try.
"I'm sure catching me in an unsupported inference"
It's called lying. I caught you lying, no surprise you'd downplay it.
"will completely make up for being caught in an absurd contradiction yourself, at least in your petty mind."
There is no contradiction, and I defy you to find one liar. I just caught you lying again. I have been consistent with my point throughout, while you have resorted to lying, which you do again here.
I have destroyed you, your moronic point, and your credibility liar. Now go ahead and deny it, while failing to post any "contradiction" once again proving that you'll lie in whatever way necessary to advance your argument.
"in civilised societies the judge decides the punishment without reference to the wishes of the prosecutor."
Bullshit. You're telling me the prosecutor's opinion isn't taken into consideration at all, even in cases where, say, the defendant gives the prosecutor helpful information on a more important criminal? Lie.
It's pretty clear that you know you're wrong, otherwise you wouldn't have had to lie to advance your point.
"What stereo type am I refering to when I talk about it on a genetic level?"
This one
"this is genetic predisposition to certain traits"
"You can attack me, but you have yet to state anything that makes my argument any less valid."
I didn't attack you, I asked a question. Why so defensive?
"I stated, in a round about manner, that the subtle assumptions that men make are the real slights."
While your "subtle assumptions" are valid right? Save that nonsense, thanks.
"Its just that most MEN"
So, stereotyping is bad except when you do it?
"The sentence meted out should be mostly based on the magnitude of the crime, and only slightly modified for wether someone pleaded guilty or not"
This is silly. It is the judge that sentences, so it IS based on the magnitude of the crime, so your objection is specious. The only thing that differs is what the prosecutor asks for, and this can vary for any number of reasons, including your willingness to cooperate and admit guilt.
"By giving someone a reward for letting you skip the due process, you're implying that somehow the due process is an inconvenient chore that we should try to do away with."
You're not rewarding them for "skipping due process" as a plea bargain IS due process. It's just one form of due process, that you are in no way required to accept.
None of your objections have any merit.
"Of course you haven't said it..." at all. Anywhere, in any for or fashion.
"Please actually read my comments before replying to them and wasting my time further."
I did, you made a claim, and are now trying to avoid supporting it, because I caught you lying and you can't admit it.
Quote or admission, that's all you have left.
"You are making the common mistake of confusing authority with power. "
No, you're trying to create a dichotomy where none exists.
Definition-"Authority: power to influence or command thought, opinion, or behavior"
"some parents can not enforce limits they try to set - the kid is tougher, craftier, and/or stronger than them."
And has all the "necessary resources" right? Oh wait, that's not right, and also where your point falls apart.
Excuses are excuses, no matter how well you think you crafted them.
"Apparently, plenty of adults run into difficulty with such things as well."
Don't be so hard on yourself.
"You keep telling yourself whatever you need to make yourself feel good about your "choice".
No one believes it but you, though, and I don't think you do either."
It's true now just like it was the first time you pretended it was a choice.
And that's the same how?
Oh right, rather than argue the issue, which you have no argument for, you change the argument.
You going to the park with your niece = wearing a condom. No one ever said anything about dipping unprotected in a bar slut, so save the inappropriate analogies for someone dumb enough to accept them like you did.
So, would you prevent your niece from going with you to the park because the risk exists that she'll be abducted?
Sucks that I won that so easily doesn't it?
No, you're the one trying to rationalize looking at women and seeing men.
"I am not the one who tries to rationalize his way out of being attracted to masculine women"
Please post the exact quote where I state that I am attracted to masculine women, or admit you're a liar.
That would be two admissions, but you never answered when I asked why you'd admit to being a homophobe to me.
"and it doesn't imply anything at all about trying to equate trivial stupidities with war crimes."
Then why say "just following orders" which was the justification for war crimes, when "just doing my job" is both more accurate and less evocative?
Or right, because it DOES imply something about war crimes, which OP acknowledged, and you're not honest enough to admit. You're completely wrong.
"The technology gives parents the power to enforce the limits they wish to set."
I thought that came as part of being a parent, why would you need technology to give you something you already have?
"I insult you for my own amusement."
No, that's just what I let you think.
DANCE PUPPET!
I said:"Now insult me because it's true and you can't do anything about it."
You replied:"What a sick freak you are."
How does it fell to know I own you and you dance when I will it bigot?
DANCE!
PS you'll notice I did not do what you claimed I would, I guess you're the only one with no ability to refrain from acting on their base impulses.
You = Property of SIIHP.
No, but I have a great example of you being a bigot in my sig.
Now insult me because it's true and you can't do anything about it.
Well one of us made a veiled attempt to equate taking cellphones with war crimes (that would be you) and one of us called that comparison into question (that would be me).
If you're genuinely thick enough to think the comparison is valid, then you're not worth talking to.
"Right after you go fuck yourself."
Done! Your turn, I have full faith you'll follow through with our agreement.
When it comes to working at a movie theater and taking away a cell phone, it works great.
If you're talking about something more serious, well, THERE ARE RULES ALLOWING YOU TO DISREGARD ILLEGAL ORDERS.
Kill yourself now.