Again we have that lovely "you have no right to privacy for information information in possession of a third party", in this case the third party being your carrier.
Well, at least by selling them and not outright destroying them or sitting on them forever, the feds have endorsed that they are at least legal to possess.
My point is that being a hero is what he's paid for, ergo him being a hero doesn't give him a free ticket to kill an asshole, because he's already being compensated for his heroism.
Slashdot Mirror
If you can withdraw it, it's a privilege.
Free market means you have someone else to go to.
He was talking about copyrights you insensitive clod!
Especially given that the votes were blatantly partisan in the trial.
Simple, they do so by fiat. Since it's private property they can ban whoever the fuck they want to and they don't even need a reason.
Not anymore it isn't.
At least they didn't swipe your work for themselves and stiff you on consulting fees.
Sorry, but you already blew it by asking the first question.
You do not get a second chance to make a first impression. Studies also show that people do not change their minds.
Changing dns and copying a website are two entirely different things.
Anyone think about microcode running inside modern CPUs?
They're practically miniature computers themselves.
Do these developers who sell the extensions even get paid? Or do they get scammed too?
Again we have that lovely "you have no right to privacy for information information in possession of a third party", in this case the third party being your carrier.
Sovereign nations are not bound by the laws of other nations.
Just because the pot's the one calling the kettle black doesn't mean the kettle isn't actually black.
Or, alternatively, takes one to know one.
SCO already got carved up in bankruptcy.
Hosting a site and having a domain name are different things.
It wouldn't just have a chilling effect, but would also saddle the hosting with the expenses of actively policing the site on their own dime.
Law enforcement should be funded by tax dollars, not corporate budgets.
Yes you SHOULD have to go through court for this.
Same as with anything else that seeks to compel the behavior of another.
Well, at least by selling them and not outright destroying them or sitting on them forever, the feds have endorsed that they are at least legal to possess.
Ironically this may actually legitimize them.
You don't need to be an auto mechanic to drive, and you shouldn't have to be a codemonkey to operate a computer.
Users should be entitled to take whatever the vendor says at face value without being screwed.
My point is that being a hero is what he's paid for, ergo him being a hero doesn't give him a free ticket to kill an asshole, because he's already being compensated for his heroism.
In my opinion, diligent bug reporters aren't freeloaders. They are involuntary beta testers.
I thought the sandbox was supposed to STOP nosy tabs from snooping on each other.
Indeed, at worst it was a salt and buttery.
Gunshots in the audience tend to get the movie put on pause anyway.