Slashdot Mirror


China's Government Unveils 'China Operating System' To Great Skepticism

redletterdave writes "The government of China is not too fond of foreign mobile operating systems like iOS and Android, so the country cooked up its own homegrown solution: A Linux-based, open-source operating system called the COS, or China Operating System. But consumers have every right to be skeptical; China is using the recent NSA scandal in the U.S. to push its own product. A government-approved mobile operating system, especially in China of all places, reeks of its own backdoor exploits for governmental spying."

223 comments

  1. US Operating System by Niterios · · Score: 5, Funny

    Quick! Someone in the US pirate this and give them a taste of their own medicine!

    1. Re:US Operating System by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 0

      Well Linux is considered a piracy by Microsoft already. Can Microsoft drug itself?

    2. Re:US Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      It exists. It's a Linux system that can't do anything because doing anything useful in the USA requires paying royalties to patent holders.

    3. Re:US Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not you freetard moron.

    4. Re:US Operating System by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 1

      Ballmer, is that you?

    5. Re:US Operating System by zlives · · Score: 1

      heading I would Prefer
      CHinA Operating System (CHaOS) is online

    6. Re:US Operating System by aliquis · · Score: 1

      All good desktops needs a song playing once it has fully loaded (obviously ..)
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb-gI_pFog0

    7. Re:US Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU you filthy, greasy haired, bird nest bearded, toe jam eating virgin.

    8. Re:US Operating System by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 1

      stop being so angry or you will lose the very last hair on you head.

    9. Re:US Operating System by ComputersKai · · Score: 1
      I think North Korea(sorry, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea :-)) ) already had this idea some time ago... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Next thing we know, the NSA creates its own "secure" OS for distribution to ensure the continued freedom and democracy that they so ardently claim they are protecting and preserving for us.

  2. Sign me up for 2! by deodiaus2 · · Score: 0

    I have nothing to hide, but then I really know that getting cooperation from the Chinese as requested by the West is really going to be a pain in the ass. Well, its about time that I start being a pain in the ass, for up to know, that was a privilege and right of the elite.

    1. Re:Sign me up for 2! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations, your post reads like it was put through Google Translate.

    2. Re:Sign me up for 2! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      What was the target language?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. before you go there by dlt074 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    remember, people in glass houses should not throw rocks. or something...

    at this point i trust our current mobile OS's as much as i trust theirs. at least with theirs i have no doubts i'm being watched.

    1. Re:before you go there by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think it's "People who throw rocks at glass houses shouldn't be stoned." Or something like that.

    2. Re:before you go there by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're missing the entire point. How can the US be a "beacon of freedom" when we officially are a police state ourselves?! Effectively, our police state is now spreading (or legitimizing) totalitarianism around the world and not just from within. THAT is the problem!.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:before you go there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It mentions that it is open source, so assumingly the source is available to check for said backdoors. but i guess certain groups' with an agenda prefer to just throw out onproven accussations and FUD. I trust the chinese a lot more than the americans at this point, never heard of the chinese secretly going into other countries to get a foreign national. china at least keeps their misdeeds mostly in china and bordering countries

    4. Re:before you go there by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      It's more a question of who will be watching you.

      Let me put it this way: if the Chinese government knows about the meth lab in my attic, what the fuck do I care? I'm not in China.

    5. Re:before you go there by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lies. Obama stands for hope and change! It's unpossible that there is even more spying being done now under his government then there was before and the NSA and other letter agencies are acting outside the bounds of law, constitution, and bill of rights.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:before you go there by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would trust theirs more. I may be watched by both, but at least China doesn't have police power over me.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:before you go there by dlt074 · · Score: 1

      oh, i'm well aware. pots calling kettles black. or something...

    8. Re:before you go there by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      I trust the chinese a lot more than the americans at this point, never heard of the chinese secretly going into other countries to get a foreign national. china at least keeps their misdeeds mostly in china and bordering countries

      Idiot.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    9. Re:before you go there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, be a good little prawn and redirect the issue to party A vs party B, or puppets C, D, E vs puppets X,Y, Z.

    10. Re:before you go there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly think this would be different had Romney been President? Congress caused this corruption, while the President could have called for change he's not likely to get any until Congress wakes the hell up and realizes that we don't need to be as afraid as our defense strategy suggests. When you are ruled by fear you're never going to move forward.Until we change enough Congress critters to make this a mandate the political climate will remain as it is.

    11. Re:before you go there by Elder+Entropist · · Score: 1

      EVERY spying initiative people are complaining about recently was put into effect when G.W. Bush was President. But then it was necessary because of the terrorists, right?

    12. Re:before you go there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realise "beacon of freedom," "leader of democracy," "god bless America," "god bless our troops," etc are just propaganda fed to Americans so they fully support the politicians and their campaign contributors when they meddle in other countries affairs and invade them, just to get cheap resources and increase profits?

    13. Re:before you go there by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      At one point, we really were a leader of democracy! Do you remember the song by Neil Diamond "We're Coming to America"? It truly meant something back in the 80s. But after the cold war, something happened. That something was a slow erosion of freedom. Nowadays, I would never play that song again. The very idea of hearing it would make me angry. That's because that great song no longer represents what America is all about. A shadow of its former glory; Sadly.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    14. Re:before you go there by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      It may well have been put into effect by Bush, it was Obama who expanded them, and in turn let the letter agencies run wild.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    15. Re:before you go there by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      EVERY spying initiative people are complaining about recently was put into effect when G.W. Bush was President.

      Certainly, and they were compounded/expanded by his replacement (in spite of promises otherwise.)

      ...your point? Because as far as I can see, both parties suck, and trying to decide which one sucks less is getting harder to do every year.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    16. Re:before you go there by Desler · · Score: 2

      Bush let them run wild, too, no matter that Obama didn't make anything better.

    17. Re:before you go there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AND they are respecting jurisdictions better than the USA. You don't see Chinese dissidents being followed across the globe and presidential planes being stopped because they might have a Chinese whistle blower. They are not droning their citizens who live abroad in "friendly" nations.

    18. Re: before you go there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who live in glass houses should shut the Fuck up. - James Holliday : `Ready Player One` by Ernest Cline

    19. Re: before you go there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Halliday* ducking autocorrect

    20. Re:before you go there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Until the NSA breaks the COS security, then leverages the same spyware the Chinese are using.

    21. Re:before you go there by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Good point!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    22. Re:before you go there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite. The States is/was no more or less democratic than most Western nations. People did migrate to the States because it provided more freedom, but so did most Western nations. The reason for America was the opportunity, Eurpean countries were already packed and not so easy to get in, Canada, Australia, New Zealand were still too sparse, but the States was already established yet had a lot of room to grow, and the opportunities to make money fast were great.

      The "leader of democracy" slogan was, just as you alluded to, a political tool for the cold war. To point out that America was the good guy and the Soviet Union and China were the bad guys. It was a great tool too, cause people like you forget exactly why America was the land of opportunity, and think it's all about the political system, which is not.

    23. Re:before you go there by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      Absolutely agree, its better to be monitored by a government that can't affect your life. Chinese citizens should download the latest NSA software, or maybe we should all use N. Korean software since they don't have the power to hurt anyone outside of their country.....

      Of course commercial information is a different story.

    24. Re:before you go there by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Cutting off their money supply is tempting. Both parties oppose elements within their own who attempt to do that.

    25. Re:before you go there by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 2

      No it's "People who bang 7 gram rocks are going to get stoned"

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
    26. Re:before you go there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If one doesn't police the supply chain enough, one simply can not be the bacon of freedom.

    27. Re:before you go there by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Doe you really expect a constitutional lawyer to do anything more than minor tweaks to the status quo?
      I don't know why you guys thought he would be anything other than conservative. Oh that's right, in the US political dictionary conservative means batshit insane teabaggers that would destroy the economy if it gave them increased political power, so I can see how people would get confused.

      BTW, how DO you suggest we reign in rogue agencies with vast amounts of influence and dirt on just about every elected official? I can't see that happening without universal outrage, an end to the current fear of "terror" and the military willing to step into the role of the toy soldiers in those rogue agencies. A conservative lawyer is not going to touch something like that sort of challenge with a barge pole.

    28. Re:before you go there by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      I thought the American presidential kettle *is* black...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    29. Re:before you go there by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      remember, people in glass houses should not throw rocks. or something...

      at this point i trust our current mobile OS's as much as i trust theirs. at least with theirs i have no doubts i'm being watched.

      China isn't more proficient than the US at spying, it's just the fake outrage about China's spying is much more public. Most likely you are being spied on a hell of a lot closer than any given Chinese citizen. Changing your OS will only help so far as the NSA is taping the network to and from your computer, your phone, and every bank transfer you make.

    30. Re:before you go there by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Give up on the party politics. Both Republican and Democrat governments have behaved exactly the same on this issue.

      They both point at each other and cry "Your fault, You did this!" and far too many people believe one side or the other instead of seeing them for what they are, an alliance designed to keep themselves in power at any cost.

    31. Re:before you go there by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      At one point, we really were a leader of democracy!

      That's ancient Greece you are thinking of. US Democracy was always corrupted by money and power.

      The US did have freedom, social mobility, land, and opportunity, but all that was drawing to a close in the 80's. Right now the US is less free than the countries people left to move there.

    32. Re:before you go there by doccus · · Score: 1

      No it's "People who bang 7 gram rocks are going to get stoned"

      You think? Really?

    33. Re:before you go there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no that is WINNING

    34. Re:before you go there by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      Me thinks you have no idea what a police state actually is. And seriously, fuck the "beacon of freedom" thing. What counts as freedom varies wildly from person to person and it's not America's responsibility to make sure other countries are free. This kind of thinking leads to the notion that we need "liberate other countries" through the use of projected power, which just expands defense budgets to buy things like new air craft carriers (which would be much better spent paying for kids to go to college).

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
  4. You download for four hours. You go now! by sandbagger · · Score: 1, Troll

    Given how compromised everything else seems to be what could they be expected to do except to try to have something they can trust. However, that doesn't mean it will ever see the light of day beyond their own governmental computers.

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
  5. Re:CHINKOS? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is restricted for US distribution as too secure, without NIST weak crypto or NSA backdoors.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  6. Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An entire nation of a billion people that actually manufacture essentially all electronics where this might conceivably be used, and they use Linux? The government of China can't come up with something of their own?

    1. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They took a lesson in "appropriation" from Apple, and BSD*cough*iOS.

    2. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guarantee you that if they had, your post would be questioning why they didn't just use a proven base.

    3. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why should they bother? Linux is there already, and is free. No need to compete, no need to make their own os.

    4. Re:Linux? by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 1

      So you accept the premise that something on top of Linux or another kernel is not something of their own? How about Android or OSX?

    5. Re:Linux? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 5, Insightful

      An entire nation of a billion people that actually manufacture essentially all electronics where this might conceivably be used, and they use Linux? The government of China can't come up with something of their own?

      I'm pretty sure that one of the reasons that Linux exists is so that everyone who wants to develop an operating system doesn't need to start from scratch. Whether the government of China is going to contribute anything back to Linux is another question. Even so, Linux does not belong to any government or nation. It was started by a Finnish guy who now lives in America and has contributors all over the world. If there's ever been a single piece of software that more or less belongs to everyone, it's Linux.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    6. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An entire nation of a billion people that actually manufacture essentially all electronics where this might conceivably be used, and they use Linux? The government of China can't come up with something of their own?

      Believe it or not, Finland is still one of the extremely high trust countries worldwide. I guess that is part of their reasoning.

    7. Re:Linux? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      It runs from embedded small systems to supercomputers, so is generic enough to run in most of their existing computers/cellphones/watches/supercomputers/etc. You can start from zero, but it will take time and won't be as tested to be safe as it is Linux today. And they had already contributed to the linux kernel, and had already their own state sponsored distributions. Open source (if you can compile it, and verify that it is really what is in the source) ensures not only that foreing hands hadn't modified it, but that neither national hands did it, if they really don't want to trust in anyone.

    8. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But also, China manufactures most of the electronics, but it doesn't design them or the software running on them.

    9. Re:Linux? by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Why should they? Linux works and they can alter any part of it they choose.

      You don't see China inventing new-fire or new-wheel either.

  7. Ahem! by TheP4st · · Score: 4, Insightful


    "A government-approved mobile operating system, especially in China of all places, reeks of its own backdoor exploits for governmental spying"
    As opposed to the reek of the daily NSA exploits published by Bruce Schneier?
    In difference from for example the RSA back door this is open source , so the code is there to review for potential back doors for anyone with the necessary knowledge. I can imagine quite a few will do so only to be able and point fingers and say "see, see! they do it too!" and would be little surprised if there is a government sponsored team doing just that as I write with the hope there will be findings to detract attention from scandals closer to home.

    --
    "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    1. Re:Ahem! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      All they need is to create a wag the dog incident by invading Taiwan.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Ahem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "As opposed to the reek of the daily NSA exploits published by Bruce Schneier? "

      No, as "in addition to" you twat. The US Govt being evil doesn't change the fact that the Chinese govt is a thousand times worse.

    3. Re:Ahem! by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 1

      Or simply lend money to Bush for him to invade Iraq.

    4. Re:Ahem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, China comes out looking better and better compared to America (well, actually America is the one dragging itself further down towards the level we expect from china) But at least China is pretty honest and unapologetic about it

    5. Re:Ahem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touché.

    6. Re:Ahem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please use the metric system to perform the measure and then compare. I'm guessing using common USA's units is confusing you.

    7. Re:Ahem! by murdocj · · Score: 1

      You're asking people to break out of Slashthink... pretty unlikely.

  8. As opposed to by JavaLord · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A government-approved mobile operating system, especially in China of all places, reeks of its own backdoor exploits for governmental spying."

    As opposed to an operating system created by an American corporation, which reeks of its own backdoor exploits for governmental spying.

    1. Re:As opposed to by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As opposed to an operating system created by an American corporation, which reeks of its own backdoor exploits for governmental spying.

      As opposed to an operating system created by a [somewhere you don't live] corporation, which reeks of...

      I think we're getting mired in our own nationalism instead of looking objectively at the facts. Mandarin and Spanish are both spoken more in the world than English. And China has billions of people. We only have millions. Why, exactly, doesn't it make sense for them to develop their own operating system? We're getting stuck on this circle-jerk about the NSA, privacy, etc., but the argument being made here is primarily economic, not political. And economically, it makes sense; The only question on my mind is... why did it take them so long to start?

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    2. Re:As opposed to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The American way to dominate things is through brutish, ham-fisted actions. "It sure would be a shame if we had to liberate your country next year." as the joke goes. What China does is corporate espionage. They will and do steal all the source code, engineering documents, and any other intellectual property they can and put your business in the dirt by undercutting you on your own work.

      Between the two, at least you can see the Americans coming and can do something about it by causing a public ruckus or getting a congresscritter in your pocket. With China there is no recourse except to desperately try to convince people that paying ten times as much for the same product is in their best interests.

    3. Re:As opposed to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In addition to not as opposed to. Stop trying to create these strawmen arguments.

    4. Re:As opposed to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      opposed - (of two or more things) contrasting or conflicting with each other.

    5. Re:As opposed to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you're only talking about first languages then more people speak Spanish than English but when you include second languages then English is more common. 500 million vs 750 million. One if four people speak at least a little English.

    6. Re:As opposed to by girlintraining · · Score: 0

      When you're only talking about first languages then more people speak Spanish than English but when you include second languages then English is more common. 500 million vs 750 million. One if four people speak at least a little English.

      But number of native speakers, English is third. Sorry, but you're gonna have to accept that you're not Number One.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    7. Re:As opposed to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather be spied on by only America than being spied on by both America and China.

    8. Re:As opposed to by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Mandarin and Spanish are both spoken more in the world than English. And China has billions of people. We only have millions. Why, exactly, doesn't it make sense for them to develop their own operating system?

      Because writing a new operating system is the wrong answer when all you need is a localization?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re:As opposed to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Chinese are still in NSA's pocket by using Linux. There are too many covert ways of slipping in a very complex bug that only NSA knows of. Imagine a sequence of ten specific packets that will trigger the bug.

      Just using the Ameircan concept of the C language means they are pwned. C code is just ripe with exploitable bugs and I now do think this was exactly the plan when Bell Labs "gave C away". The big people in the US (read: top of mil) were scared about millions of small crypto devices (a Z80 is already good enough for strong ciphers). So they set out to do something about it: C. And Unix in order to make C popular. Linus is a useful idiot. Or worse.

    10. Re:As opposed to by aliquis · · Score: 1

      The reason they have worried about Chinese goods so much is likely because they knew they it could be done and that they was doing it themselves so why not assume at least may do it.

    11. Re:As opposed to by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Why, exactly, doesn't it make sense for them to develop their own operating system?

      Why *does* it make sense? What benefit can they achieve that cannot be achieved faster and better by contributing to linux?

      Is it, for instance, coded in a Chinese-based programming language?

      Will Google not accept the patches that they need for [some reason]?

      but the argument being made here is primarily economic, not political.

      What is the argument, specifically? It seems like they have a 10-year self-imposed handicap if they're starting from scratch. The Mythical Man Month applies everywhere humans are involved.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  9. It's Open Source at least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When all the Shell Infrastructure Windows servers got shut down at Venezuela directly from Redmond after the compayy's subsidiary there got nationalized, we learned a valuable lesson: closed source software is an error, at least at any government instances.

    At least the Chinese OS is open source, so it could be audited by the users. I'm not saying they can't place a piece of code in the mobile phones or computers after the community audited it, but to me it looks like a step in the right direction...

    1. Re:It's Open Source at least... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      There is nothing in China forcing the government there to abide by the GPL. They can close all the source if they want. What is RMS gonna do - go to Tiananmen Square?

    2. Re:It's Open Source at least... by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Well, if he does, we know how that's going to turn out. Oh yeah, guess the Chinese government is worse than the United States.

    3. Re:It's Open Source at least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not going to step in the middle of the US vs China shitstorm, especially after the latest revelations of NSA spying.

      but at the same time, I don't trust a distribution thats explicitly packaged(read last bit before distribution to customer), by a nation state. While the United States certainly doesn't have a good track record, China doesn't either.

      Its not like there aren't non-Government, non-Big Business alternatives.

      cynagen mod comes to mind. In addition its well done, and includes a whole host of security features.

      china can do whatever it wants, I don't trust it any more than the US government

    4. Re:It's Open Source at least... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      When all the Shell Infrastructure Windows servers got shut down at Venezuela directly from Redmond after the compayy's subsidiary there got nationalized...

      This is very interesting to me, and I've never head of it. I've done some googling and come up with nothing. Do you have any links to share?

    5. Re:It's Open Source at least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you that it is a step in the right direction. The next one would be having the phone producers have the code on their website for downloading and compiling if desired. That would help about the adding code after audition problem.

    6. Re:It's Open Source at least... by msobkow · · Score: 1

      If you're going to dig up ancient history, how about the American treatment of the blacks during the slavery years or the murder of hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of First Nations people before that?

      Every nation has it's dark days -- even Canada, which rounded up Japanese people and put them in camps.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    7. Re:It's Open Source at least... by tibman · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if 1989 counts as "ancient history" but it's a valid point. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989#Death_toll

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    8. Re:It's Open Source at least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1970 isn't that ancient either. This happens in a "free" country http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings

    9. Re:It's Open Source at least... by tibman · · Score: 1

      You'll also notice the difference in governmental/societies response. One covered it up and one made memorials/policy changes.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    10. Re:It's Open Source at least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's not a public domain fact. The father of an ex university mate worked for Techint (an Argentinian company which manufactures oil pipes) and was commissioned there around the time President Chavez made the oil reservoirs a national resource. He worked in the technical area, as Shell contractor. He told me that story when he came back, and that's one of the main drivers of the national initiative in Venezuela to have Open Source core systems at all the Government and strategic resources.

    11. Re:It's Open Source at least... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      But the US government is a fast learner :(

    12. Re:It's Open Source at least... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      That's actually a sign that things were changing. The tank drivers did not want to run over the protesters and some actively avoided them.
      In Mao's time they would have got in deep shit for that and it would have been a much bigger atrocity.
      In the twenty years since then it has improved a great deal. Nowhere near perfect, I wouldn't want to live there and I know people that don't want to go back - but there's been so much change that Mao and the early days of the recovery from his rule may as well be ancient history.

    13. Re:It's Open Source at least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace "audit" by "formally proven correct". And, do the same with with the Pentium wiring. See the L4 OS for an attempt.

    14. Re:It's Open Source at least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your nice "democracy" kills 100k Iraqis and conspires with Sunni Islam, the Wahabists to bring war to plenty of places. Go to the fucking hell !

    15. Re:It's Open Source at least... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Because one country still has the dated mindset of trying to control its population by physical force and blatant propaganda, while the other realises that being more subtle is a far more effective way of achieving the same goals.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  10. DavrOS by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2

    Endorsed by Daleks everywhere as an alternative to NSA tainted American products!

    1. Re:DavrOS by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2

      The Daleks dropped that when they found that DR-DOS made them run a lot faster.

    2. Re:DavrOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A)bort, R)etry, E)xterminate?

  11. The Great Back Door of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great Wall...Great Firewall...etc

    1. Re:The Great Back Door of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of deploying patches to close security holes, they'll deploy patches to open security holes.

  12. Audit? by twocows · · Score: 2

    If it's open source, then just audit it. Find what pieces are different in what ways and review those sections. I guess that's easier said than done, but still.

    1. Re:Audit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says china will open source it? What power do you think the GPL has in China?

    2. Re:Audit? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      What I wanted to say as well. Slashdot conveniently ignored the term. Let me put it here again: OPEN SOURCED.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    3. Re:Audit? by NuAngel · · Score: 1

      The article here on Slashdot you should've just read before commenting says "open sourced."

    4. Re:Audit? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Open sourced as in - it's easily available for the Chicoms to copy. Once they're done, they don't have to make any of the source code of the end product public. They can just release it as closed source and all their phone makers will just have to swallow it.

  13. Should be on low-end tablets in months by Animats · · Score: 2

    This should start appearing on low-end tablets within months. Especially the ones that use the Allwinner CPU. 100% China-controlled technology at last.

    Where do you download the source?

    1. Re:Should be on low-end tablets in months by Herger · · Score: 1

      Or Loongson (Dragon Core)...

      Either way, I look forward to the antics at border crossings when Chinese nationals try to bring Chinese hardware running China OS into the USA. I'm sure there will be no issues there with device searches!

    2. Re:Should be on low-end tablets in months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That Allwinner thing runs a GCHQ cpu design. ARM is British, as in BRUSA alliance.

    3. Re:Should be on low-end tablets in months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Loongson actually seems to be a genuine Chinese design, albeit using a US instruction set. Are there any development boards ala RPI around ?

      RPI is GCHQ and NSA from cpu and gpu (that one has a closed-source blob, to top things off !)

  14. So, is this based on SELinux? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    A government-approved mobile operating system, especially in China of all places, reeks of its own backdoor exploits for governmental spying.

    "Especially in China"

    Did Cold Fjord write the blurb?

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
    1. Re:So, is this based on SELinux? by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      No, it was redletterdave, as noted in the header.

      I might have included this bit.

      .... Chinese officials have begun wiretapping each other’s bedrooms and showers out of distrust. Even China’s president was wiretapped by a member of the country’s own Communist Party. -- Meet COS

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:So, is this based on SELinux? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      No, it was redletterdave, as noted in the header(*).

      Sockpuppet? False flag?

      Or being thrust aside by a younger, fitter, more go-getting cow-orker?

      Anyway, pull your socks up or you may end up being replaced.

      ((*) Damn, forgot to collect the metadata)

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    3. Re:So, is this based on SELinux? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      It's a pity you don't seem to serve a useful purpose. Even UnixWare seems to manage that, even if barely.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:So, is this based on SELinux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey cold fjord, you forgot we're watching you on your webcam.
      Mind pulling up your pink thongs, and not be so obvious as you masturbate at Harry Styles (assuming it's Harry Styles, since your room is full of his posters).
      Appreciate you doing your job, but even us NSA guys are not that gay.

    5. Re:So, is this based on SELinux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cold Fjord makes you hot?

  15. Should be a fascinating read by Weaselmancer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can't wait to have a look at it. We know there will be backdoors and other goodies in it. Should be absolutely amazing to see what it monitors, how it does so, whom it calls home to, and so on. Let's see what China considers an ideal piece of software.

    I think this will be a powerfully interesting piece of software to study. We'll learn a lot from it, I'll bet.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Should be a fascinating read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You speak as if the US has its hands clean..

    2. Re:Should be a fascinating read by shentino · · Score: 1

      Just because the pot's the one calling the kettle black doesn't mean the kettle isn't actually black.

      Or, alternatively, takes one to know one.

    3. Re:Should be a fascinating read by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      I would never suggest such a thing. Even Switzerland has spies. I am only interested in how competent China's efforts are.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    4. Re:Should be a fascinating read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see what China considers an ideal piece of software.

      Let's see what the Chinese government considers an ideal piece of software. FTFY.

      Not trying to nitpick, but as a U.S. citizen, I am very painfully aware of the distinction between a country's population and a country's government.

  16. Will there be a chinese Snowden? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I guess the main difference between China and the US is that the US has the lure whistleblowers back for punishment while I suspect that China is much more efficient in remediating leaks.

    1. Re: Will there be a chinese Snowden? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      What would a Chinese Snowden blow his whistle on? Everyone in China already knows their government is spying on them.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  17. Eh. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm skeptical of this system because it is at least the second (after 'Red Flag', possibly more of them than that, certainly a lot more if you count 'nationalist linux forks' generally, rather than just Chinese ones), and past attempts havent exactly set the world on fire with their success.

    More generally, though, I'm skeptical largely because (at the present time) you basically have to shop like Richard Stallman (and possibly even harder than he does, if some TAO-level group has designs on you) to have a chance in hell to even see all the security-relevant software/firmware that goes into your system in anything other than a mixture of OSS components, proprietary userspace applications, and firmware blobs (often doing not-even-a-debugger-knows-what on the various totally undocumented application-specific processors hanging off various busses). So long as that's the case, even if your OS is FOSS and you've audited the hell out of it (odds are you haven't) and you have a robust security model designed to keep applications in check (obligatory XKCD, odds are that it will all come to nothing because your lowballing vendor has a BSP full of proprietary shit, your GPU vendor won't offer anything but a binary blob unless you abduct the entire Board's families and threaten to return them one slice at a time, and you don't have a clue what various surprisingly punchy microcontrollers and very-low-end ARM cores attached to dangerously useful (and mostly unexamined) busses are doing in their own memory spaces.

    If Team China manages to solve these problems(especially acute in cellphones because the cellular baseband which makes wifi interfaces look like GNU-paradise by comparison in terms of openness and robustness), then I'll be damn interested, no matter how much their 'yet another shitty fork of something that they could have just audited' linux-derivate OS bores me. If they don't manage to solve them, or don't even bother, that this is just some balance-of-trade enthusiast crying into his beer about Android's ubiquity in the Chinese smartphone market, who cares?

    1. Re:Eh. by jimmydevice · · Score: 1

      Do you write for Cracked?

    2. Re:Eh. by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      I'm skeptical of this system because it is at least the second (after 'Red Flag', possibly more of them than that, certainly a lot more if you count 'nationalist linux forks' generally, rather than just Chinese ones), and past attempts havent exactly set the world on fire with their success.

      More generally, though, I'm skeptical largely because (at the present time) you basically have to shop like Richard Stallman (and possibly even harder than he does, if some TAO-level group has designs on you) to have a chance in hell to even see all the security-relevant software/firmware that goes into your system in anything other than a mixture of OSS components, proprietary userspace applications, and firmware blobs (often doing not-even-a-debugger-knows-what on the various totally undocumented application-specific processors hanging off various busses). So long as that's the case, even if your OS is FOSS and you've audited the hell out of it (odds are you haven't) and you have a robust security model designed to keep applications in check (obligatory XKCD, odds are that it will all come to nothing because your lowballing vendor has a BSP full of proprietary shit, your GPU vendor won't offer anything but a binary blob unless you abduct the entire Board's families and threaten to return them one slice at a time, and you don't have a clue what various surprisingly punchy microcontrollers and very-low-end ARM cores attached to dangerously useful (and mostly unexamined) busses are doing in their own memory spaces.

      They have an advantage we don't, though.

      They're the ones doing the hardware manufacturing.

      If Team China manages to solve these problems(especially acute in cellphones because the cellular baseband which makes wifi interfaces look like GNU-paradise by comparison in terms of openness and robustness), then I'll be damn interested, no matter how much their 'yet another shitty fork of something that they could have just audited' linux-derivate OS bores me. If they don't manage to solve them, or don't even bother, that this is just some balance-of-trade enthusiast crying into his beer about Android's ubiquity in the Chinese smartphone market, who cares?

    3. Re:Eh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is China we're talking about, where the "lowballing vendor" is likely to work in the same country, and knows what kind of trouble they'll get into for pulling shenanigans. The Chinese government doesn't have to worry quite as much about foreign vendors outside of control, accountability, or close lines of communication. RMS might not be able to get a Chinese manufacturer to custom make a batch of fully documented, open-spec hardware, but I bet the Chinese government can.

    4. Re:Eh. by hey! · · Score: 1

      A very thoughtful and insightful post. That said, it's *also* true that if somebody can exert control somewhere between the applications and the hardware, you aren't just *vulnerable*, you're wide open.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:Eh. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Red Flag Linux is a commercial project that came out of a university, with some government funding. It is doing quite well in China as an alternative to pirate copies of Windows or for people who don't want the US to spy on them.

      This new OS is aimed at smart phones and tablets. The success of Red Flag Linux isn't really any indicator as to how well it will do. It isn't supposed to be secure against the kinds of hardware exploits you mention, it is supposed to give Chinese companies and home-grown OS to use as an alternative to Android.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re: Eh. by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      This is China we're talking about. They will get whatever source code, specs, etc they ask for, because whoever refuses will find themselves in prison, probably with their company nationalized. That sort of thing happens regularly in China, for far less capricious reasons than this.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  18. Everything Old is New Again by Etcetera · · Score: 1

    Been there, done that.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Flag_Linux

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Star_OS

    Not to get all Stars and Stripes, but I trust Communist, Totalitarian dictatorships to write secure OS's about as far as I can throw them.

  19. Red Flag Linux by game+kid · · Score: 2

    I thought this sounded like a dupe*, but Red Flag Linux is apparently not a Chinese government project as I began to think for some reason**.

    *On China's part, not Slashdot's!

    **Like, totally not because of the name or anything. ;)

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  20. isn't this more like china's linux distro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    isn't this more like china's linux distro? calling it China's Operating System is implying that they wrote everything from scratch.

    1. Re:isn't this more like china's linux distro? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      calling it China's Operating System is implying that they wrote everything from scratch.

      Sort of like Google calling it Android OS implies they wrote everything from scratch?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  21. Linux is for Communists! by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2

    Here we have absolute proof that Linux is for Communists. Just as Steve Ballmer said. Only a commie would use free software to write code so they don't have to pay the evil capitalists their 30 pieces of silver.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Linux is for Communists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's for sure one of the reasons why I use Linux... but wait... I'm french ! Fucking socialist frogs.

  22. MaOS by orledrat · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not upgrading. I'm sticking with MaOS. I like my standards open.

    1. Re:MaOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what

    2. Re:MaOS by broken_chaos · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a wordplay on "Mao", the guy famous for kickstarting communism in China.

    3. Re:MaOS by wasteoid · · Score: 1

      Your Ma is like your OS - open.

    4. Re:MaOS by The_Star_Child · · Score: 2

      I still haven't received my $50 perk for donating to Mao's kickstarter.

    5. Re:MaOS by hawkingradiation · · Score: 1

      How about COMMIE OS: China Offering Multi Man Independent Effort Operating System. This is the development model: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." Ha just joshing ya, that was then and this is now: Corporate Oligarchy Man in the Middle "I" on Everybody OS. "I" being a loose Chinese translation that means "eye", must have been somebody new to English.

      --
      Society use your Sciences
  23. What happened to Kylin? by NuAngel · · Score: 2

    So there was that Kylin Linux distro, then Ubuntu Kylin, and "Red Flag Linux," and now... a mobile one? Interesting key word, though, is that the article calls this an Open Source mobile OS. User "war4peace" noticed this, as well. I'll be the first to admit that I am *NOT* a coder, but how many backdoors can you hide in something that is open source? I'm sure it's large and it would take time to go through, but if it is open source it *could* be gone through, right?

    1. Re:What happened to Kylin? by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      how many backdoors can you hide in something that is open source?

      Quite a few, if you're clever (although of course you only need one). Code that introduces a vulnerability can be very subtle -- so subtle that even if someone discovers it, they are likely to think it is a bug rather than something that was placed there deliberately.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:What happened to Kylin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition to that, when you compile the source, the compiler can put the stuff there when it's compiling, so nothing in the source. They can say 'see, nothing in the source', and then distribute binaries that actually have backdoors and whatnot. Most people will use the binaries.

  24. on the other side of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I would prefer to be spied on by a country on the other side of the world than the one I'm living in. I'm never going to pay a visit over there, and they have no cooperation in data-exchange with the country I'm living in. I do not affect them (except possibly buying there cheap things on eBay), I'm just a number. And hence, they have no effect on me. Except possibly being able to provide more targeted ads for the stuff I like to buy from them. A bit like google. My home country (or allied "friends") spying on me however...

    1. Re:on the other side of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But, they DO affect you. People wonder why the economy gets into crunches, jobs go away, and if there are jobs, it is barista level or minimum wage. So, that country on the other side of the world you rather have spy on you has its citizens working, getting free college, while you and your friends are trying to compete for minimum wage scraps.

      Look at the US solar industry. China came in, slurped critical manufacturing plans, ran out... six months later, panels were coming onto US shores for cheaper than the rare earth cost. Congress did nothing (although when Harley was in trouble, they made sure that anything anywhere near an imported bike was extremely taxed as punishment. Maybe Harley is far more critical to US national security than energy independence, but what do I know.)

      So, go and laugh, cheer on people who make China and Russia stronger, and US/European interests weaker. It is only your job, your future, and your kids' hope of a future that you will lose. If you want your daughters and sons to be treated like Roma when they have to emigrate to another country to survive, then be my guest. I prefer to have the country I live in retain a sustainable economy, so my kids don't have to emigrate as refugees like my ancestors did from Germany.

    2. Re:on the other side of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like there's actually two requirements here:

      1. China/Russia not displacing/replacing all our industrial infrastructure our future generations depend on for jobs.

      2. The American citizens' own country giving a shit if China/Russia displaces all our industrial infrastructure, if a next-quarter profit can be made in the stock market by eviscerating it.

      #1 we really don't have control over, and have limited arguments against in the context of "free trade". #2 we don't have control over either, since the non-1% are entirely functionally disenfranchised. So, what are you suggesting? A country that at least in terms of stated objectives, cares for the welfare of its people even when that doesn't happen to also be the optimal way to maximize shareholder value? I think you'll find that more in China than in America, at this point.

      captcha: hopefuls

    3. Re:on the other side of the world by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      You could try a country where the government has minimal power to interfere with people creating and running those businesses, rather than sucking up a large part of the economic output and funneling it to their cronies.

      Any call for the government to 'protect us' will just make it bigger and more intrusive, and thereby make things worse.

    4. Re:on the other side of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your premise seems to be precisely what China is currently economically disproving.

      "My personal economic maximization" simply isn't synonymous with "social economic maximization", particularly with respect to those "future generations" being discussed. I'm not saying we need a proverbial "5 Year Plan", but we need SOME plan.

      captcha: extends

    5. Re:on the other side of the world by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      If China uses my information to come up with a cheaper way for everyone to sit around in their underwear drinking beer reading news on the internet, where do I sign?

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    6. Re:on the other side of the world by dbIII · · Score: 1

      There are people in US politics that would like to see a solar or wind industry destroyed for ideological reasons so that's why there has been very little action.
      When it's the "wrong" sort of capitalism they are very much anti-capitalist.

  25. input system by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    If they get foreign language input systems working in Linux, then who cares? At that point they've already improved the community, which is the beauty of open source.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:input system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fwiw, recently a chinese vendor's windows japanese input
      software (FEP) found to phone home your keystrokes. Spying or classic idiocy you be the judge.
      On the other hand would like to hope some great new linux code might come out of it once the public gets to use it.

  26. May Not be Open Source by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 3, Informative
    According to zdnet.com it is not open source. However, due to "safety concerns", COS is not an open source system, revealed a 21cbh.com report.

    If so then they are likely in non complience with the licenses involved.

    1. Re:May Not be Open Source by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If so then they are likely in non complience with the licenses involved.

      I am shocked that the Chinese government would not comply with software licenses.

    2. Re: May Not be Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait till they get a sternly written letter from Stallman! That will fix it!

    3. Re:May Not be Open Source by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      Of course it could just be a mix of open source and closed source similer to google. The OS is open but the email, phone, and chat services are closed source. With strict goverment control of apps on the market.

    4. Re:May Not be Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, a single person have written functional OSes for 3 different hardware platforms, it's not hard, the have the resources of China at their disposal. No need to violate any license.

      Second, they could have simply bought the rights from someone.

      Finally, and most important...

      Last I checked, china wasn't bound by US laws, and we know for a fact they don't give a shit about US copyright laws. The GPL only works because we allow it to and support it legally. Sue them for using your precious Linux ... They'll care, really they will ...

    5. Re:May Not be Open Source by shentino · · Score: 1

      Sovereign nations are not bound by the laws of other nations.

    6. Re:May Not be Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese government is in compliance with software licenses.

      The fact that the local developers work in government buildings, get a government salary, use the government network, and eat at the government cafeteria means nothing. Also, anyone attempting to photograph the employees, the building, or the food will be arrested, by the government. That's a coincidence. Any attempt to examine, reverse engineer, review the source code, or analyze COS will be detained. That's a commercial matter.

      All you need to know is, the Chinese government is in compliance with software licenses.

    7. Re: May Not be Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll just buy him a parrot and he'll roll over, he always does.

  27. Can I ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... get the source, compile it and load it onto a bare hardware phone?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Can I ... by dwater · · Score: 1

      You need to examine the source of the compiler too then, right?

      --
      Max.
  28. My Linux is better than you Linux by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

    The debate is no longer about whether Linux should rule the world, but which flavor should.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  29. Root.. by sqorbit · · Score: 1

    Just another OS for someone to release a root kit for.

    --
    Sent from my TARDIS
  30. Yes, but does it run Linux? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Yes, but only if this guy orders it to.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  31. Can only fool once by Trachman · · Score: 0

    Microsoft should have known that once you sell your soul to NSA, it ain't coming back. That is the price for having dual loyalties to the customers. It will be not the Chinese government who will be punishing Microsoft and will not be buying MS products. Be sure that European Union, Russia, Brazil and other countries will lead the open source movement. It will be shareholders who will punish Microsoft.

  32. Any technical details? by RamiKro · · Score: 1

    Is it an Android fork or Gnu/Linux?

  33. Take away SCO by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Why don't they simply buy SCO, I mean Ximian? Take it all, put UnixWare on Loongson or Allwinner in Beijing University and then put together something from scratch? Make the localization Mandarin only, and then run it? Yeah, I know that SCO was a dog in its day, but on today's hardware, and 2GB RAM, it should fly. Just put it on the Loongson, and watch it fly.

    Since it's proprietary, they can build all the backdoors they want. They can drop all the SCO lawsuits in return for being granted rights to all patents that SCO's enemies own. In fact, since it's in China, they needn't do even that. They'll have their own OS that the West will want no part of. In fact, make SCO stand for Standardized Chinese OS, instead of Santa Cruz Operations.

    1. Re:Take away SCO by shentino · · Score: 1

      SCO already got carved up in bankruptcy.

    2. Re:Take away SCO by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I meant their assets - buy all rights to UnixWare from Xinuos, and then it's theirs. Just cover the lawyer liabilities and let them go home, and the assets can transfer to the CPC.

    3. Re: Take away SCO by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Buy it? Because the Chinese totally give a shit about IP rights?

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    4. Re: Take away SCO by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Ok, then just take it. Just take the last UnixWare, and everything that ran on it, and put together an OS. Localize it in Mandarin, Cantonese or any of the other dialects, and put it out. Call it Chinix.

    5. Re: Take away SCO by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Why? What technical advantages would UnixWare give them over Linux? It seems like a lot of extra work for no real benefit.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  34. I'll take both! by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't be complaining, this is great! Diff all the common code. Hopefully you'll turn up the Chinese backdoors readily, and maybe they've also been smart enough to close some of the US ones, identifying those also.

  35. Red Flag Linux by unixisc · · Score: 2

    And they have their own - Red Flag Linux. Just stage it on top of whatever they run, and they're off to the races

  36. If Americans use it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If American use it, and Chinese use SELinux then maybe the NSA will have to ask the Chinese for dirt on us, and the Chinese will have to ask the NSA for dirt on their own people. Yeah I know it wouldn't work that way; but it's funny to think about it.

  37. Polish Competitor by jrmech · · Score: 1

    I heard there was Polish OS a few years ago, too. Not too widely used, but it had a similar acronym....

    1. Re:Polish Competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been known to exclaim POS!!! a few times. Thank you for explaining to me that I was merely saying the full name of the Polish Operating System.

  38. COS PR Campaign by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Make Bill Cosby your spokesperson
    Step 2: Bippin and a Bobbin, flippin and a floppen, pudden pops!
    Step 3: PROFIT!!!

  39. Both for firewalls too? by ron_ivi · · Score: 2

    And wonder if it makes sense to use as a firewall in front of a US-friendly one.

    Seems a pair of firewalls ought to be configurable so unless *both* have a back door you're safe.

  40. choices for when buying connected gear by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

    lets ask ourselves: who is going to spy on us with this gear?

    if in the US and its the US spying, that's bad. they can do damage to you.

    if in the US and its china spying, do I really care all that much? I would avoid using any payment methods but as for worrying about what I would say online, I'd think that the foreign governments would not really be able to do much to me no matter what I say.

    your own local government has the ability to thoroughly ruin your life. to me, that makes them the stronger danger to my privacy and freedom.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  41. Annnd then? by BlazingATrail · · Score: 0

    This new OS has a very easy to use command line. % I'd like the house special chicken and two egg rolls Computer: ANNNDD THHHHEN ? % no and then! Computer: AAAAANDD THHEN?

  42. China OS reeks of backdoor exploits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A government-approved mobile operating system, especially in China of all places, reeks of its own backdoor exploits for governmental spying"

    And companies are only allowed to install NSA approved backdoors ...

  43. What are they going to name their app store? by rayzat · · Score: 1

    COS Play?

  44. tl; dr: plus Oz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay No attention to the man behind the Red Curtain! ... *sigh*.

  45. Feature list: by Snufu · · Score: 1

    273 different methods to perform file copy.

  46. As a non-American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I say it with confidence that in the 80s, America was truly or closest to a world leader, that every other country looked up to. Such great soft power contributed to the crumple of USSR. The 80s was the golden age of America, and probably for the world in general as well. But things turned ugly in the late 90s, and America went complete psycho after 911.

    1. Re:As a non-American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Golden age? Becoming the world's biggest debtor? Running the largest deficits since the WWII era? Continued CIA meddling in other country's affairs?

  47. Native OS by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    For their Native CPU perhaps? ( RedStar, mostly a MIPS copy, if i remember right. )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  48. Epic Facepalm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A government-approved mobile operating system, especially in China of all places, reeks of its own backdoor exploits for governmental spying.

    You really had the balls to say that when your own god damn government is spying on you right now?

  49. as a US citizen I'm not worried about china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm more worried about my own government

    specifically me doing or saying something to upset someone in power and being "made an example of"

    so yeah I would totally use this operating system without regret if it

    sadly I have to re-learn the lessons of my parents and relatives that fled soviet russia
    keep your head down, stay quiet, and they might not bother to get you, but if they do want to get you there is nothing you can do about it

  50. they should've called it Android Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ya, they should've called it Android Linux. But the "OS" is there for marketing. If you ask any non-computer geek consumer on the street who wrote Android OS, they'll say google. So in their minds, google wrote it all.

    and as early as 2010, there were stories about China looking to "write their own os" based on Ubuntu.

    http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/03/goodbye-windows-china-to-create-home-grown-os-based-on-ubuntu/

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kylin_(operating_system)

    1. Re:they should've called it Android Linux by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      If you ask any non-computer geek consumer on the street who wrote Android OS, they'll say google. So in their minds, google wrote it all.

      This amounts to intellectual dishonesty on Google's part. "Oh we accidentally forgot to credit our sources, now nobody knows, heh heh, why should we do anything about it?"

      Apple is obviously just as dishonest with FreeBSD and Webkit. But we expect a higher standard of behavior from Google... or do we?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re: they should've called it Android Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple used a lot less of FreeBSD than people tend to think. I'll try to dig up the FreeBSD mailing list reference.

  51. ubuntu by trendzetter · · Score: 1

    Based on ubuntu?

  52. pinkOS - "better RED than READ" by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was about to say, this would be a perfect OS for use in the USA, because the NSA will be completely locked out. Sure, the politburo would know all about your applesauce cupcakes recipe, but that's the price of freedom from domestic oppression, right?

    But then I got to thinking, a few years back there was a NIX branch that the NSA created or approved that was hardened out of the box, presumably to be used internal to the NSA and other alphabet soup groups. One would think that they wouldn't be crazy enough to backdoor their own system, so this might be a wonderfully secure system to keep the NSA fucks off your box...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:pinkOS - "better RED than READ" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then I got to thinking, a few years back there was a NIX branch that the NSA created or approved that was hardened out of the box

      SELinux. Standard fare in RHEL and RHEL-variants, though errybody immediately disables it, because it does exactly what it claims to - makes your life a living hell, because actual security takes a hell of a lot more than a sudo prompt.

    2. Re:pinkOS - "better RED than READ" by dbIII · · Score: 1

      One would think that they wouldn't be crazy enough to backdoor

      A place run by the Star Trek set guy? A place with apparently Byzantine office politics which is not under adult supervision is almost certain to have backdoors into their own system all over the place. After all, Fred needs to be taken down a notch if Geoff has a hope at being promoted before him.
      If it wasn't such a huge money burner it would be funny.

    3. Re:pinkOS - "better RED than READ" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AppArmor is a quite straight-forward approach, thoug. A pity so few people use it.

    4. Re:pinkOS - "better RED than READ" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...there was a NIX branch..." Red Hat?

  53. There may be no compliance problem ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    According to zdnet.com it is not open source. However, due to "safety concerns", COS is not an open source system, revealed a 21cbh.com report. If so then they are likely in non complience with the licenses involved.

    There may be no compliance problem. COS may be like Android, effectively its own operating system with its own API, just using Linux as a host environment.

  54. cONGRATUATIONS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your post motivated me to get up from my couch in the basement and go find my bowl, which I had previously obfuscated under a piece of detriment to avoid plain view.

    1. Re:cONGRATUATIONS by doccus · · Score: 1

      Your post motivated me to get up from my couch in the basement and go find my bowl, which I had previously obfuscated under a piece of detriment to avoid plain view.

      have one 4 me 2

  55. Re:CHINKOS? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    If it's based on Linux, it already contains a huge amount of code contributed by the NSA.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  56. There can be only one? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

    What happened to China supporting Red Flag Linux? And Ubuntu China? Why are they doing yet another nationalized distro?

    Does this one have any benefit over the others?

  57. Stalin Again by johnwerneken · · Score: 0

    Gee how ambitious - one's own view of reality, regardless of how badly it models the real world or does anything whatsoever besides provide excuses for terrorism - the principle forms of which are nationalism, religion, racism (apologies for redundancy), group consciousness of any kind, and the original evils, fear and its twin, pride.

  58. Not going to happen by dbIII · · Score: 1

    They seem to be waiting for Taiwan to roll over and join them - perhaps with a bit of overt manipulation of Taiwanese politics. It's headed that way. It's also becoming less relevant all the time as the Chinese economy grows.

  59. Racism by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    It's racism, pure and simple. China is the current boogyman, the enemy of the day for the US now that Islamic terrorism is receding.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  60. ChAOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ChAOS = China Alternative Operating System
    crate tsunamis not puny waves :-)

  61. somwhere else was written... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that it is not open source! it uses opensource (linux) but they close-sourced it. Out of security reasons (well or what ever real reason).
    it's from here: http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/20671/china-enthuellt-staatlich-gefoerdertes-mobil-betriebssystem-cos.html (German)

  62. [offtopic] They're back! From beyond the grave! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Xinuos is the new name of UnXis, Inc., a company formed by Stephen Norris Capital Partners and MerchantBridge Group which in April of 2011 acquired the operating assets of The SCO Group, Inc.

    AAARGH! It will not die!

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  63. The COS by ketomax · · Score: 1

    A Linux-based, open-source operating system called the COS, or China Operating System

    So, I can run the aforementioned country using this Operating System?

  64. moral high ground opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If China wants to make an OS, then they could make it a good one.

    Making a simpler, but more secure version of Linux seems a useful option.
        One security improvement might be to move the TCP part of TCP/IP into the user space.
        You could keep the same sockets libtaty app interface, but move most of the complicated (ie attack surface area)
          to user space. This would make the kernel networking features more like a router/firewall.

    This basic trend of simplifying the kernel where access to everything is a given probably could be applied to other features as well.

    Of course, open, auditable source is a given for this path.

  65. Lingua Franca by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

    So what? English is lingua franca for most of the western world. It's boring as hell, actually. You see people from all corners of Europe together in a room, all speaking English to each other. It's not a question of who is number one, it's about how English gets used in the real world. Being the most popular second language (which Ethnologue claims is true of English) is actually more important the number of native speakers, at least until such point as perfect audio-based machine translation becomes ubiquitous (likely never).

    Half your posts are provocative by way of being wholly obtuse, and the other half are merely provocative.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  66. Science Fact by ChoosyBeggar · · Score: 1

    Multiple films of the past have posed the villain as being a large corporation that engineered backdoors into its OS software, yet now we accept this as a given in most every case.

  67. Tragic Waste by Baldrson · · Score: 1

    The opportunity to introduce a new operating system platform with sufficient critical mass to overcome existing standards is an opportunity to introduce advances in OS theory, and languages, that have been achieved over the decades. Hell, f all they did was adopt the A2 operating system with Active Oberon it would be an advance over Linux/"C".

  68. Re:CHINKOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you'd prefer NiggerOS. You have to speak in ebonics for the voice recognition to work.

  69. COS? by Randym · · Score: 1

    Gives a whole new meaning to COSplay....

    --
    DNA is a Turing machine. You, however, being dynamic and emergent, are not.