My doctor/psychologist would probably lose his license and even risk jail time. HIPAA and all that.
That would be a better analogy for a company manager blabbering trade secrets in public, in that the distinguishing attribute of the information that makes its release heinous is confidentiality instead of how bad a light it puts someone in.
How many of the coddling teachers coddle out of fear from litigious parents? Or under orders from administrators who have that fear on their own heads?
Teachers failing students because of their opinions may not be fair, but sadly it's very good practice for how the real world is going to work, where having the wrong opinion can get you fired by a boss that has no incentive to care.
From what I gather the app does nothing more than act as a "confession for dummies" in that it guides you through the process, among other things suggesting potentially confessable sins.
Unless and until consumers get enough leverage to make it different, ISPs will be the ones calling all the shots on who gets IPv6 and when. It's their wires and their routers that have to cooperate.
And the lovely part of it is that other workers who are breaking the rules even more flagrantly are given a blind eye if they're not pissing off the management.
Selective enforcement is quite fun. Even more fortunate is that once your ex employee is thrown out of the office he loses access to the evidence he needs to prove any wrongdoing on your part.
However, it's only because his coworkers joined in that it became collective bargaining.
If he was left high and dry, out on a limb all by himself, then he'd have no leg to stand on. The fact that his coworkers shared in his opinion saved his ass and gave NLRB a loophole to rescue him.
Slashdot Mirror
In theory, updates that are deliberately fragile for anything other than pristine locked phones would count as sabotage.
Usually it's the PHB's kissing ass with the networks that order lockdowns.
If you have to remain anonymous to avoid retribution, you don't have freedom of speech.
Doubly so if a weak kneed service assisting your anonymity can be pushed over by a subpoena.
The only wrinkle I'd buy is that the students were minors.
Or worse, sue said teacher to pieces for slander. Threatening people with lawsuits is a very effective tactic.
My doctor/psychologist would probably lose his license and even risk jail time. HIPAA and all that.
That would be a better analogy for a company manager blabbering trade secrets in public, in that the distinguishing attribute of the information that makes its release heinous is confidentiality instead of how bad a light it puts someone in.
The teacher in that case would likely get fired for attracting a lawsuit for slander against the school district.
How many of the coddling teachers coddle out of fear from litigious parents? Or under orders from administrators who have that fear on their own heads?
As a matter of principle, you should be able to do as you please on your own time unless you've made an agreement to the contrary.
In practice, if your boss has enough leverage, he can get away with pretty much anything.
Since bitcoins can be destroyed through abandonment, I predict that bitcoins will become impossible to continue for a long term basis.
If I were the principal I would probably throw her to the wolves just to placate lawsuit happy parents.
I wonder if any of little johnny's parents threatened legal action prior to the decision to suspend.
Teachers failing students because of their opinions may not be fair, but sadly it's very good practice for how the real world is going to work, where having the wrong opinion can get you fired by a boss that has no incentive to care.
Mod parent up: funny
To hell with it being a private blog, the students are minors.
Having no *official* reason is what my post and your second paragraph are referring to.
Like I said, it works if the employer keeps his trap shut.
From what I gather the app does nothing more than act as a "confession for dummies" in that it guides you through the process, among other things suggesting potentially confessable sins.
Blue Pill.
If you're not a mechanic you have no business driving a car.
Unless and until consumers get enough leverage to make it different, ISPs will be the ones calling all the shots on who gets IPv6 and when. It's their wires and their routers that have to cooperate.
But why offer new firmware when they can rake in more money pushing new equipment?
Sure, the captain might be court martialed afterwards for sinking the ship but all hands are still lost.
Employment contracts are a lot like EULAs. Forced on the weaker party by a stronger party with all the bargaining chips.
And the lovely part of it is that other workers who are breaking the rules even more flagrantly are given a blind eye if they're not pissing off the management.
Selective enforcement is quite fun. Even more fortunate is that once your ex employee is thrown out of the office he loses access to the evidence he needs to prove any wrongdoing on your part.
Except that he could use at will employment as a loophole to backdoor the system. It works quite well in practice if the boss keeps his trap shut.
However, it's only because his coworkers joined in that it became collective bargaining.
If he was left high and dry, out on a limb all by himself, then he'd have no leg to stand on. The fact that his coworkers shared in his opinion saved his ass and gave NLRB a loophole to rescue him.