In fact it was a Laserjet 4L. I might have put in a few more but the bolt was getting very sticky at that point, so I satisfied myself with some desultory bayonet thrusts and called it a day.
Not just 5 rounds at a whack, but without stripper clips. Me and that printer, we had history.
Meh. The NRA does/not/ speak for me, those people are batshit crazy. My rifles are for target shooting and hunting; nothing like blowing the shit out of a recalcitrant printer with eighty rounds from one's Mosin-Nagant.
The objection to the public sector having unions has a whiff of "why, I don't get those kinds of benefits anymore (now that my workplace has been de-unionized and partially outsourced to the third world), so why should those people?".
Dishevel seems to be saying "you can't 100% prove to my satisfaction that he's doing this because he doesn't want fracking by his property, so I refuse to believe it and you people claiming this are liars", which is silly.
Why are you so invested in "you people are lying, he's just coincidentally against this thing that's TOTALLY UNRELATED, I SWEAR"? You're being willfully obtuse.
roffle. That's straight out of "Mises.org Talking Points 101", especially the "go read a book, you ignorant person, because I can't be bothered to make cogent arguments" bit at the end.
Certainly unions are not perfect, and nobody will argue otherwise. The proper thing to do is reforming them so they'll actually represent the members' interests, not nihilistically destroying them so the rich and powerful can become more rich and powerful... which, not coincidentally, is what said smug Internet Libertarians want to do with government, because they're sheltered idiots who think they'd be the ones rising to the top.
It's basic reasoning: he's a CEO of a major oil company that does fracking elsewhere, someone else comes in and starts fracking next to him, he finds reasons that aren't blindingly hypocritical to oppose it because saying "I don't want fracking in my backyard" would be devastating to his own company.
I guarantee you that if the neighboring operation didn't need the tower and noisy trucks he'd still find other reasons to oppose it. That's just how people are. Besides, you are likely going to have need for extra water (a tower) and noise in any fracking operation, he just thinks that he shouldn't have to suffer like us proles because he's rich and powerful.
Slashdot Mirror
In fact it was a Laserjet 4L. I might have put in a few more but the bolt was getting very sticky at that point, so I satisfied myself with some desultory bayonet thrusts and called it a day.
Not just 5 rounds at a whack, but without stripper clips. Me and that printer, we had history.
Meh. The NRA does /not/ speak for me, those people are batshit crazy. My rifles are for target shooting and hunting; nothing like blowing the shit out of a recalcitrant printer with eighty rounds from one's Mosin-Nagant.
And we other gun owners are free to mock you for being idiots.
See, this is something actually nerdy but nobody gives a shit. /. is dead.
Luxury.
Meanwhile, the RAF categorically denies that an Avro Lancaster was seen near the dam earlier that day.
True, but it was more recently that they quit selling Macs with 32-bit EFI, and 10.8+ requires 64-bit EFI.
Wrong. Lion requires 64-bit CPUs but can run with 32-bit EFIs. Mountain Lion and Mavericks require 64-bit EFIs.
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht...
Because while they correctly identify some of the problems that exist, their ideas to fix them are naive and often enough stupid.
OP couldn't have gotten first post if he'd RTFA'd.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. There is no "libertarian government", because there's never been any such thing. You just have pontificating idiots.
The thing I read said that Boeing was paid to build new wingsets, which presumably means "new" and not refurb.
Actually the A-10 fleet all got new wings and engines as part of the A-10C upgrade.
In the same way that Social Security is, i.e. not at all but it sounds scary and technical and makes the speaker appear intelligent.
But there's big money involved, so that's okay.
The objection to the public sector having unions has a whiff of "why, I don't get those kinds of benefits anymore (now that my workplace has been de-unionized and partially outsourced to the third world), so why should those people?".
In other words, you don't have any proof, you just have your gut feeling. Also, your writing style is not unlike Youtube or news-site comments.
As another poster pointed out, "if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck...". You're quibbling.
Dishevel seems to be saying "you can't 100% prove to my satisfaction that he's doing this because he doesn't want fracking by his property, so I refuse to believe it and you people claiming this are liars", which is silly.
Why are you so invested in "you people are lying, he's just coincidentally against this thing that's TOTALLY UNRELATED, I SWEAR"? You're being willfully obtuse.
I'll take my "proof by innuendo" over "I'm too willfully blind to put two and two together".
Sure, and I mostly agree. But that's not a reason to do away with them entirely.
roffle. That's straight out of "Mises.org Talking Points 101", especially the "go read a book, you ignorant person, because I can't be bothered to make cogent arguments" bit at the end.
Certainly unions are not perfect, and nobody will argue otherwise. The proper thing to do is reforming them so they'll actually represent the members' interests, not nihilistically destroying them so the rich and powerful can become more rich and powerful... which, not coincidentally, is what said smug Internet Libertarians want to do with government, because they're sheltered idiots who think they'd be the ones rising to the top.
It's basic reasoning: he's a CEO of a major oil company that does fracking elsewhere, someone else comes in and starts fracking next to him, he finds reasons that aren't blindingly hypocritical to oppose it because saying "I don't want fracking in my backyard" would be devastating to his own company.
I guarantee you that if the neighboring operation didn't need the tower and noisy trucks he'd still find other reasons to oppose it. That's just how people are. Besides, you are likely going to have need for extra water (a tower) and noise in any fracking operation, he just thinks that he shouldn't have to suffer like us proles because he's rich and powerful.