Slashdot Mirror


Navy Won't Investigate Nuclear Pollution At San Francisco's Treasure Island

Lasrick writes "The Center for Investigative Reporting spent a year investigating whether San Francisco's Treasure Island is contaminated with radioactive material left over from the decades the island was a naval base. Treasure Island is being transferred into civilian hands, and the city of San Francisco has plans to turn it into a 'second downtown.' Despite the fact that radioactive debris has been found around the island, the Navy refuses to conduct testing that might show whether radiation cleanup should be started before development begins, Independent testing by CIR and others has found high levels of cesium 137 and other radioactive substances at several spots on the island, and by examining unclassified military documents, CIR has found that the history of the nuclear work done at Treasure Island and the lack of safety protocols at the time mean the contamination is most likely wide-spread. Complaints by current residents has only resulted in bureaucratic infighting among state health departments and the Navy."

121 comments

  1. Caveat emptor x2 by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let the buyer beware, and be extra wary when the seller is the one responsible for enforcing the safety of sellers.

    1. Re: Caveat emptor x2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thiught it was Google Island. Weren't they making those mystery barges there? If Google has already bought it, problem solved. Google can pay for the cleanup.

    2. Re:Caveat emptor x2 by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      It's more like if public servants want to play with nuclear material they need to take responsibility for it. What would you do if your employee took this attitude?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Caveat emptor x2 by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The navy isn't a public servant.

      That aside, they probably do not want to risk their already shrinking budget getting stuck with the cleanup. Instead, once it changes hands to another government entity, congress will allocate money through the superfund process already in place to deal with stuff like this. Its a wash to the tax payers as it would only be an accounting gimmack.

    4. Re:Caveat emptor x2 by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Isn't the US military controlled by the civilian government? They serve the civilian government, and by extension the civilians that the government represents.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Caveat emptor x2 by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      http://www.law.cornell.edu/usc...

      5usc section 2101 specifically exempts unifo2rmed services from civil servants

    6. Re:Caveat emptor x2 by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      The navy isn't a public servant.

      That aside, they probably do not want to risk their already shrinking budget getting stuck with the cleanup. Instead, once it changes hands to another government entity, congress will allocate money through the superfund process already in place to deal with stuff like this. Its a wash to the tax payers as it would only be an accounting gimmack.

      More likely, if it is like similar instances in WA, they are trying to push it off on the state and thus it is a fight between the state and federal governments as to who gets to pay for it.

    7. Re:Caveat emptor x2 by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

      You may be right but it appears the biggest difference would be who is in charge of the remediation. Also, since this would be considered a hazzardous material, access to the superfund monies can bipass congress and simply use and administrative order. I'm sure it is more complex than i'm making it sound though.

  2. Star Trek IV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And Admiral... it is the Enterprise

    1. Re:Star Trek IV by BancBoy · · Score: 1

      Alameda, not T.I. But close.

      --
      [UID-HeinzIntel]
  3. get the mythbusters to test for it by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    get the mythbusters to test for it

    1. Re:get the mythbusters to test for it by the_skywise · · Score: 2

      "Jamie... I'm glowing!"
      "Well there's your problem! I'd say that's Myth Confirmed!"
      "That's all well and good for you but I look like a dead Jedi Knight now! Although that's pretty cool!"

    2. Re:get the mythbusters to test for it by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      Just get yourself a shiny Geiger–Müller counter and be done with it.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    3. Re:get the mythbusters to test for it by budgenator · · Score: 1

      You can't just assume that one type of radiation meter will yeild accurate results in all circumstances, GM (Geiger–Müller) type meters frequently under-mesure beta radiation and are barely able to detect the presence of alpha radiation, the CS-137 is primarily a beta emitter and radium is primarily an alpha emitter, so both would likely be under-detected using GM survey meters. Both nucleotides would represent a significant inhailation hazzard to the TI residents while being under-detected. If I had to recomend one instrument for surveying residential areas for fission products it would be a Dual phosphor, scintillation counter .

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    4. Re:get the mythbusters to test for it by profplump · · Score: 1
    5. Re:get the mythbusters to test for it by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Just FYI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N...

      Oops brain-crap, s\nucleotides\nuclide\.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    6. Re:get the mythbusters to test for it by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Wrong show. What we need is the Prototypers to build something to clean up the site.

      (Unless it was them who actually contaminated the site in the first place.)

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  4. Is it going to be paved? by NReitzel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If the area is going to end up paved, without wells or agriculture, then low level cesium contamination is beside the point.

    When Los Alamos (of Plutonium era) was refurbished for civilian use, the walls were painted over with bright red paint, followed by white paint. The paint was adequate to block plutonium alphas and daughter betas. The rule for the buildings was "if you see red, call maintenance."

    --

    Don't take life too seriously; it isn't permanent.

    1. Re:Is it going to be paved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless the red is in the toilet bowl after you use it. In that case, call the funeral home.

    2. Re:Is it going to be paved? by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Stop pointing out the facts!! The alarmism sells so much better, especially when it involves R A D I A T I O N ! !

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    3. Re:Is it going to be paved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, I agree that demolition, paving, and construction does not throw up any dust. They can just paint the whole thing red first. No biggie . .. no need to test anything.

      You must always be giving out your brilliant ideas as random acts of kindness to humanity . . . or work for the NSA . . .

    4. Re:Is it going to be paved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, be a man! Whats a little radiation gonna do, besides give you and your children cancer.

      Complain, complain! Personally, I'd eat the shit, and die with hair on my chest.

    5. Re:Is it going to be paved? by jythie · · Score: 1

      Eventually yes, but generally construction involves a lot of digging up and moving materials around first. So if there is significant contaminated dirt it then becomes contaminated dust and that is a bit more of a problem.

    6. Re:Is it going to be paved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you eat plutonium (especially weapon's grade), you'd probably die of heavy metal poisoning when you eat too much of it. Kind of like eating lead or mercury. You would not die from any "radiations" it produced.

    7. Re:Is it going to be paved? by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Whats a little radiation gonna do, besides give you and your children cancer.

      You know what's REALLY scary? I have it on good authority (from a scientist friend of mine) that currently, outside of every American house, is all kinds of R A D I A T I O N, even as we speak. He says that this so-called "ultraviolet" R A D I A T I O N is all over the place, and the government isn't even doing jack-shit about it! Can you believe that? They're just going to let us be exposed to that stuff EVERY DAY, and not do a damned thing about it!

      Fuck it, I'm calling my local news station. If we're going to be exposed to this stuff, we need to at least start a panic.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    8. Re:Is it going to be paved? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately to pave the area they have to dig up all the contaminated topsoil, which is a worker exposure issue. The soil's two orders of magnitude above the statutory limit.

      Then there's the issue of what you do with the topsoil that you do not intend to pave over.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    9. Re:Is it going to be paved? by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Just toss it in the bay; with the radiation plume arriving from Japan, no one will ever notice!

    10. Re:Is it going to be paved? by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 1

      The Red Paint was, likely, what the navy calls Red Lead. It's a lead-based primer used on ship to protect against corrosion. Perfect for stopping alpha and beta particles. The white paint is also, likely, lead-based but suitable as a base for regular paint.

      I just wish they would use lead-based paint when painting the lines on roads...the new, non-lead stuff wears off too quickly. But, the eco-folks would probably have a bear (not literally).

    11. Re:Is it going to be paved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eat the radioactive samples and tell us how harmless they are. If you don't you're a pussy.

    12. Re:Is it going to be paved? by spongman · · Score: 1

      red paint isn't going to stop the gammas from Ba137.

    13. Re:Is it going to be paved? by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      The Red Paint was, likely, what the navy calls Red Lead. It's a lead-based primer used on ship to protect against corrosion. Perfect for stopping alpha and beta particles. The white paint is also, likely, lead-based but suitable as a base for regular paint.

      I just wish they would use lead-based paint when painting the lines on roads...the new, non-lead stuff wears off too quickly. But, the eco-folks would probably have a bear (not literally).

      We have to protect the children who crawl onto highways and eat the paint off the roads.

    14. Re:Is it going to be paved? by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Wen Ho Lee called home instead of maintenance.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    15. Re:Is it going to be paved? by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      The deal with plutonium is if u eat one particle and it lodges in your intestinal track,
      it will emit over time and trigger cancer that way.

      One molecule of it given to a test dog killed it but it was not a quick death so to speak.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    16. Re:Is it going to be paved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't realize children also drank gasoline in the 1960s.

      I think you dramatically underestimate how seriously toxic lead is to children's neurological development. I'm the kind of guy who buys samples of Polonium-210 and sticks it my pocket so I can show it off to friends. Lead, OTOH, scares the crap out of me, at least as regards kids.

      The Caesium issue is probably overblown. And in any event, the island is small, and it should be easy to skim the top-soil off. This is really just an issue of money and accountability.

      The problem with lead on roads is that roads are everywhere, and they leach contaminates into the watershed. And lead poses a helluva lot more danger to children than Cs-127 does on a tiny, man-made island.

    17. Re:Is it going to be paved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, OK. I just RTFA. We're not talking about a dusting of radioactive material. They buried chunks of radium, and other contaminated material, on site, in various pits. Then never told anybody about it. Then in the 1990s when development started, construction workers inadvertently spread it around everywhere.

      "McLean reported finding radium pieces that emitted enough radiation for a person at close range to receive, in an hour, five times the maximum radiation a nuclear worker is allowed to absorb in a year."

    18. Re:Is it going to be paved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's good that you don't understand the difference between radiation and radiological contamination. That way you don't realize quite how *silly* your post is.

    19. Re:Is it going to be paved? by valpo+homeboy · · Score: 1

      Radiation! Half-baked goggle-box do-gooders telling you it's bad for you! Not at all!

    20. Re:Is it going to be paved? by Krigl · · Score: 1

      Citation needed, genius. And no, Weekly World News doesn't count.

      --
      Troll 2.0 Fear my asocial networking!
    21. Re: Is it going to be paved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming lead based paint I suppose, and not Baer ultra-white (titanium based)) paint.

      Don't babies gnaw on paint?

    22. Re:Is it going to be paved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pernicious nonsense. Everybody could stand a hundred chest X-rays a year.

    23. Re:Is it going to be paved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. Just an unsubstantiated "bogeyman" scare claim.

      There is actually empirical, scientific evidence (pdf) pointing to exactly the opposite being true!

  5. where Treasure == Poison by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

    Yeah, sounds about right.

  6. The City is built on a landfill by Buck+Feta · · Score: 1

    So pick your (radioactive) poison.

    --
    I am Audience.
  7. Our government has forgotten who they work for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all. Move along.

  8. Everyday Life Has Become a Health Risk by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The wind shifted
    back in the fifties particles drifted
    A wave set in motion
    the Pacific Ocean
    test of the hydrogen bomb
    There from would come
    too close to home
    ships from the test
    put to rest
    and convalesce with heavily armed guard
    in Hunter's Point shipyard
    Heavy metal sandblast
    Facemask

    Deoxidize
    Remove the radiation from the outside
    a hazardous cargo
    dumped into the harbor
    went farther then that though
    Sand from the blasting
    made into sidewalks
    played on by kids
    that just got over chicken-pox
    Glowing faces
    All races
    Hop-scrotch bare feet
    on Geiger counter concrete
    Mother prepares a fruit salad treat to eat
    sprayed with messed up pesticides
    none have been tested for health effects
    on the side

    Medical racist social statistics
    Has everyday life become a health risk

    Meanwhile, back in the backyard,
    father lights-up a barbeque fire
    and he sizzles hormone injected meat
    on top of a toxic source of heat
    He becomes light headed
    as the toxins easily meet
    with the lite beer in his head and
    he glances to his portable television set
    from his eyes he wipes the double vision sweat
    visions of white supremacists
    posing as right conservationists
    holding an Aryan agrarian Woodstock
    lead the stray sheep into the flock
    hookin' em in with the music of flower power
    change their energy into fire power

    Medical racist social statistics
    Has everyday life become a health risk

    All of a sudden
    acid rain falls from the sky
    and gets into the nuclear family picnic pie
    not to mention their Kool-Aid
    The nuclear family sits down to lunch
    They munch it down with acid rain punch
    and they begin to hallucinate
    disassociate
    the pain in their bodies
    from the pain in their minds
    They go inside and remember a time
    before the world went
    completely blind
    When people grew bald naturally
    no mutations
    unlike Skinheads
    and chemo-therapy patients

    Medical racist social statistics
    Has everyday life become a health risk

    --M. Franti/Spearhead

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. Ooh Scary! by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 5, Informative

    You have to read to just about the end to get this:

    Those concentrations do not confirm a health hazard, according to Jan Beyea, a prominent nuclear physicist specializing in the health effects of low-level radiation. They are no greater than common contamination worldwide from 20th-century nuclear fallout.

    1. Re:Ooh Scary! by compro01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That line only applies to the cesium. The radium contamination is more relevant, as it means the building will have radon problems that will require dealing with.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:Ooh Scary! by mspohr · · Score: 1

      "McLean reported finding radium pieces that emitted enough radiation for a person at close range to receive, in an hour, five times the maximum radiation a nuclear worker is allowed to absorb in a year."

      "In addition to the dangerously radioactive radium pieces, McLean’s readings showed that soil surrounding the objects was contaminated with traces of the material."

      "For 46 years before the base was selected for closure, Treasure Island was home to nuclear war academies that used a variety of radionuclides in their training—including radium, plutonium and cesium 137—an in-depth review of military and government documents shows. The Navy knew for years that those materials were not always in safe hands. But the Navy did not acknowledge that history publicly, and as a result, cleanup crews and others preparing for redevelopment may have inadvertently spread radioactive material around the island."

      It does look like they at the minimum should do a very thorough investigation of radiation on the island.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    3. Re:Ooh Scary! by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Radon is generally only an issue in poorly ventilated areas, usually cellars or basements where the radioactive gas can build up. These are rare in California in general, and unlikely on Treasure Island where groundwater is present at ~4-8 feet below the ground surface. Direct exposure to radiation, especially through inhalation or ingestion of radioactive dust, is probably a bigger issue.

    4. Re:Ooh Scary! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Don't assume this is just an isolated case, just google Fort McClellan. Agent Orange contaminated with dioxin, PCB, Sarin and Mustard are all still there.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    5. Re:Ooh Scary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are the odds that new buildings are going to be constructed here with basements that don't have some sort of air conditioning?

      If the answer to that is some positive number, then yes, someone's going to have to think about radon. Otherwise, forget it.

    6. Re:Ooh Scary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Presidio has issues too. Nuke residue from the old Nike missile site is just one of them. The military leaves a lot of messes behind.

  10. And coming up next on Mythbusters! by the_skywise · · Score: 4, Funny

    Has Adam Savage gained super powers after his exposure to radiation?

    Jamie: "Okay, Adam jump off the top of the building!" ...
    Jamie: "Nope... can't fly..."

    1. Re:And coming up next on Mythbusters! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Has Adam Savage gained super powers after his exposure to radiation?

      Yes, he can throw cannon balls through house walls.

  11. heh heh offtopic, nice shillmod you traitor by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    If there's one thing this isn't, it's offtopic. This song actually addresses the specific topic we're discussing here.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:heh heh offtopic, nice shillmod you traitor by Xinef+Jyinaer · · Score: 1

      My kingdom for mod-points today.... Not sure how it ever got modded offtopic, thanks for sharing however.

      --
      Some days I just get bored and Troll post all the memes I can think of...
  12. It's deja vu ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    ... all over again for those who lived through Love Canal.

    1. Re:It's deja vu ... by voodoo+cheesecake · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thought you might like this from Troubled Lands The Legacy of Soviet Environmental Destruction by D. J. Peterson
      http://www.rand.org/pubs/comme...
      (Chapter 5)

      "For example, in the town of Sillamae in northeastern Estonia, nearly
      300 children attending two kindergartens suffered a loss of hair in 1989.
      When the story first broke in March of that year, the Soviet press agency,
      TASS, reported that specialists initially had suspected the cause to be
      natural radioactivity emanating from local shale deposits. Subsequent
      tests, however, revealed that background radiation in the town was
      normal. After months of speculation and controversy, the former director
      of the Baltiets enterprise, a local defense industry, revealed that his com-
      pany had dumped radioactive wastes in the town. The two kinder-
      gartens were built over the dump, separated from it by only a thin layer
      of sand."

    2. Re:It's deja vu ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

      I have long held that the former Soviet Union and its satellites provide the best example of the costs extracted from a society by the most common form of corporate welfare, being allowed to pollute. Unfortunately, it is a lesson the West has largely ignored.

      Thank you for your insightful post

  13. 'breathtaking view' re-defined? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dead man talking series; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZ2VpfUqRoo

  14. Yeah, sounds like another superfund site by Marrow · · Score: 1

    I found out years later I lived pretty close to a superfund site. Not a happy discovery. Hmm, I wonder if there are any funds available if its govt?

    1. Re:Yeah, sounds like another superfund site by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

      At least at first, expect more hand-washing than environment cleaning.

  15. no numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is telling that this news article, published in "The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists" contained zero quantitative radiation or dose rate information within its several thousand words. Lots of "He Said" stories but no numbers. Did the authors of the article labor under the false assumption that their intended audience was numerically illiterate or do they have nothing but unsubstantiated anecdotes?

    1. Re:no numbers by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Despite it's title - the "Bulletin of Atomic Scientists" is and always has been a political rag. They publish numbers when it suits them, and fall back on unsubstantiated anecdotes when it doesn't.

  16. Love Canal II: Nuclear Boogaloo by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    Can't imagine anyone would ever think building on a toxic radioactive dump would be a good idea

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    1. Re:Love Canal II: Nuclear Boogaloo by Nimey · · Score: 1

      But there's big money involved, so that's okay.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Love Canal II: Nuclear Boogaloo by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      They'll just take care of that through a disclosure form in the 8 inches of paperwork that a prospective homeowner has to go through. And, when that one comes up, the realtor will just say "Aww, that's just one of those forms the State makes us put in there. This next one deals with..."

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  17. Re:Fuck the Navy by bobbied · · Score: 1

    And the Marines are just the Navy's policemen. Yea, yea.

    Remember the Air Force used to be PART OF THE ARMY and the NAVY existed 100+ before the guys in blue. Also remember that the Navy flies too, only they use 1,000 foot long runways that float around and does just about EVERYTHING the guys in Blue can. The Air Force rarely uses anything under 6,000 foot, so who has the better pilots?

    Ah, the old flame wars of old, BEFORE we had the internet, before we had FIDONET, before we even had modems and computers..

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  18. Re:Smash U.S. imperialism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have you ever been a member of or in any way affiliated with the communist party

  19. >Complaints by current residents has only resulted in bureaucratic infighting among state health departments and the Navy."

    Complaints by current residents have...

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  20. Agreed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't see any issues with them using the island. Cs-137 is pervasive as well as plutonium. As long as no one is ingesting or inhaling particles it shouldn't be a problem. I want to know just how "contaminated" this place is. If readings are a few CPM above background I wouldn't worry in the least.

    The story stems for the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, who have been nothing but scaremongers ever since the Cold War about nuclear destruction.

    1. Re:Agreed. by mspohr · · Score: 2

      "As long as no one is ingesting or inhaling particles it shouldn't be a problem."

      Easy solution. Just hold your breath and don't eat or drink anything while on the island... people are such wimps.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    2. Re:Agreed. by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      It seems that Tom Lehrer's advice "Don't drink the water and don't breathe the air" is still valid decades later...

    3. Re:Agreed. by jafac · · Score: 1

      The question is; is the Cs-137 from the Navy, or is it from Fukushima?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  21. Treasure Island already paved and populated!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf, treasure island is fully populated and has complete infrastructure, seems like people have been living there for years already......I just looked at google maps. So wtf is everyone on about?

  22. St. Mary's Island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Part of Chatham dockyard (at which my father worked)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Mary's_Island,_Medway
    was allegedly used to wash down the Royal Navy ships that had been to pacific nuclear tests when they came back in the 1950's & 1960's
    Those were very dirty tests
    http://www.nuclearveterans.com/breaking_news.html

  23. The CIR doesn't exactly have the best track record by bferrell · · Score: 1

    Look into their recent Richmond CA HUD reporting. They sort of chose to ignore huge chunks of stuff in favor of sensationalism

  24. The Army actually built this island from scratch.. by cyn1c77 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... now the corporate sector is getting impatient that they can't profit off of it! Ridiculous.

    The most cost efficient solution would be to just remove the highway exit leading to the island.

    Build a new island if you want to build high-priced condos to continue to overpopulate San Francisco. Or let the corporations that will profit off of the condos actually pay to cleanup the island.

  25. Re:Smash U.S. imperialism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would worker's government be the one who follows they own regulations and laws? Or would we call that a working government?

  26. morons by slashmydots · · Score: 1, Funny

    Since it's San Francisco, the planners probably think the nuclear radiation will help their quantum auras if they wave around new age crystals and hang them from the mirrors of their Toyota Priuses.

    1. Re:morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's just Governor Moonbeam up in Sacratomato.

      The real big shots in The City just see a win-win financially, while being sure to keep the windows of their Bentleys and Lambos rolled up on their way over the bridge.

    2. Re:morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never been to San Francisco have you pussy?

    3. Re:morons by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on any new age bashing you can think up. But if you bash my prius, I'll run you over, and then run you over another 99,000 times with all the extra gas I have.

    4. Re:morons by Krigl · · Score: 1

      Umm, how exactly are planning to catch him in your ever-so-lazily accelerating douchemobile? enema>

      --
      Troll 2.0 Fear my asocial networking!
    5. Re:morons by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      Stealth. The Prius is super quiet, I'll sneak up on him.

    6. Re:morons by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      That's absurd. I'd hear your obnoxious hippie music from the stereo first.

  27. Re: east rutherford was a chemical dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was? Still is. Along with the whole state of New Jersey

  28. how much?! More or less than average human? by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Humans are radioactive too. The question is, how much? What are the numbers? Without that information, the article is 100% completely useless.

    The state of California once proposed standards for formaldehyde levels that would have categorized human beings as dangerous carcinogens, because our bodies produce formaldehyde needed for certain body processes. With no numbers and no sense of scale, anything, even your own body van be made to sound scary.

    1. Re:how much?! More or less than average human? by Krigl · · Score: 1

      The question is, how much? What are the numbers?

      Well, the question "how much" led to my skimming of both articles (I've clicked the link to The Bullshit already, so what), but strangely enough, neither "scientists" nor "investigative reporters" could be bothered with such trifles. In absence of evidence, let's feel free to call it morons' nonsense until someone is able to produce actual data.

      --
      Troll 2.0 Fear my asocial networking!
  29. Start selling it by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    These are some stupid corporations. Start selling the dirt in the middle east. Best case scenario: you'll make bank from selling it to stupid terrorists who think it will be useful for making dirty bombs (and it will be, for certain definitions of "dirty"). Worst case scenario, the government will decide maybe they SHOULD clean it up.

  30. Re:The Army actually built this island from scratc by MrEricSir · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Except it was built for the World's Fair and intended to be re-purposed as an airport. The Navy base idea came later.

    But hey, no reason to let facts get in the way of your knee-jerk response, right?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  31. Re:Fuck the Navy by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

    Also remember that the Navy flies too, only they use 1,000 foot long runways that float around and does just about EVERYTHING the guys in Blue can. The Air Force rarely uses anything under 6,000 foot, so who has the better pilots?

    The Air Force does. The Navy has aviators, not pilots. ;)

  32. Re:Fuck the Navy by bobbied · · Score: 1

    And the ARMY has the flame throwers so they win Flame wars..

    That's no lady, that's YOUR wife!

    Stick around folks, I'm here all day!

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  33. Re:The Army actually built this island from scratc by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    Contracts are already signed; it's not "impatience" when you've been sold the goods and told that, hey, turns out they might be more radioactive than permitted by state law.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  34. Radon and radiation is Everywhere! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Radon is a problem that is prevalent all over the country. Quoting the EPA:

    "Radon is a radioactive gas. It comes from the natural decay of uranium that is found in nearly all soils. It typically moves up through the ground to the air above and into your home through cracks and other holes in the foundation."

    You also get a daily dose from cosmic rays, again quoting the EPA:

    "Fortunately, Earth has an atmosphere that helps absorb and filter them out, which protects us from high doses of cosmic radiation. However, some radiation is able to make it through. The dose of cosmic radiation that you receive varies depending on the altitude of the area in which you live."

    Currently we are enjoying a bath of man made radiation from all the bombs we have set off, all the nuclear plant leaks, improper handling of materials over the years, etc.

    If the folks in charge in San Francisco aren't too concerned then I wouldn't be either. If memory serves they are about as green as you can get in that neck of the woods.

  35. Re:Smash U.S. imperialism! by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    The Soviets had one of those. They need more help cleaning up their own nuclear waste sites.

  36. Just ask by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    Michael, Trevor or Franklin to clean it up in a submarine

  37. That's what the NRC is for by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

    Why would you even want the Navy investigating nuclear contamination if they are the ones who are responsible for it in the first place? Honestly, what do you expect them to find?

    That's a bit like asking BP to determine if there is any oil contaminating the Gulf of Mexico or asking Union Carbide if there happens to be any toxic chemical pollution in Bhupal.

    The Nuclear Regulation Commision is the agency that oversees radioactive material safety, have them do it.

    1. Re: That's what the NRC is for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NRC regulates commercial applications. It has no authority over the military, and it would require congressional action to allocate funds and authority to scratch the fleas on this sleeping dog.

      Why not ask the Fed to ingest Treasure Island in their pool of publicly funded toxic assets? Then have Citi derive bonds from the future value of the decontaminated and developed property once it becomes a destination resort, swap credit default with Japan for its Fukushima exposure, sell the future value of the interest income to China to offset its carbon footprint and create an indexed electronically traded fund to capitalize the remaining risk using a structured investment vehicle that is legislatively qualified as a trust prefered investment? By the time it unravels, all of SF will be owned by Google and they can take it as a tax loss.

    2. Re: That's what the NRC is for by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      The NRC regulates commercial applications. It has no authority over the military, and it would require congressional action to allocate funds and authority to scratch the fleas on this sleeping dog.

      This isn't about assigning blame; everyone knows that you can't hold the US military accountable for anything. it's about finding out if the site is safe to build on before it is developed commericially. From TFS "Treasure Island is being transferred into civilian hands, and the city of San Francisco has plans to turn it into a 'second downtown.'

      That's why I said the NRC should be involved. I don't really care if they do it or some other entity. I was just questioning why anyone thought it would be a good idea to let the Navy handle the investigation.

  38. In other words.... by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    "Piss off, you hand-wringing, liberal, enviromentalist weenies. Your federal government is all about privatizing profit and socializing expenses. You want it cleaned up? You pay for it."

  39. Re:The Army actually built this island from scratc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fancy that. The Navy does not need to give two shits about state laws, especially in backwards California.

  40. They figured Equalization would solve the problem by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

    I guess they figure that the radioactive material coming from Fukushima would
    equalize it all given enough time and decided not to bother....

    What most ppl don't realize is that the US taxpayer paid for this happen TWICE....

    The 1st time for what this article is talking about, and the 2nd time when stuxnet
    either caused or made worse the disaster in Fukushima.

    http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/no...

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  41. Re:Smash U.S. imperialism! by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

    It will just get hijacked like the unions did, just a different set of globalist gangsters.

    Its funny how most of the governments of the world act like a state sponsored mafia.

    The hits just keep coming...

    Terrance Yeakey, MIchael Hastings, Andrew Breitbart, Karen Silkwood, Pat Tillman, etc etc...

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  42. Re:Smash U.S. imperialism! by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

    Well you know what old Vladimir said.

    "The goal of socialism is communism" ~ Vladimir Lenin

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  43. Re:Smash U.S. imperialism! by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 2

    Though the current system here in the US resembles something Mussolini would setup...

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  44. Re:Treasure Island already paved and populated!!!! by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    It was a Navy base starting in World War II, and then used for "Atomic Warfare Training" until the end of the cold war.

    I'm guessing they're on about the crap disposal procedures they used in the 50's and 60's regarding chunks of radioactive material, as well as the procedures used to hose down the "USS Pandemonium" with radioactive shit (simulating a nice coat of nuclear fallout), and then clean it off.

    It was all in TFA, in case you were curious.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  45. Send this guy there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about sending The Director of Sustainability for New York's MTA there. He thinks companies need to build in blighted downtown areas. Here's his chance.

  46. Re:Ooh Scary! SLR by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    Speaking of "ground water", I believe the island is susceptible to high tides now and it (the island) is not getting any higher. A recent study (http://www.bcdc.ca.gov/planning/climate_change/TreasureIslandStudy.pdf) used 55" as a plausible/high level for sea level rise (SLR) by 2100. It rose 8 inches in the last 100 years, according to the same study. Plus the island is isolated as far as public transportation - perhaps people are looking to build in a place near SF that most people have trouble getting to?
    Seems like a poor choice for a place to invest in the long term, if it's going to be underwater.

  47. Re:The Army actually built this island from scratc by budgenator · · Score: 1

    When the Government gives something away or sells it, your due dilligence should be much more dilligent than usually due. If it really had any value the chances are someone's cronies would have had the first refusal, so if you really get a crack at it, it most likely has a negative value.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  48. Re:The Army actually built this island from scratc by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    Not sure what your point is: The island was still built by the Army Corps of Engineers.

    The Navy base idea came after Pearl Harbor, when the Navy needed an area to stage its ships before sending them out to war. They requested that San Francisco submit a purchase price. After San Francisco decided that the island was not for sale, the Navy seized it. They then traded Mills Field for the island. (Mills Field eventually became the San Francisco International Airport, which probably would not have fit under the Bay Bridge anyway!)

    The city still got to hold its exposition, which is why the island was built. They then got land elsewhere for their airport. It's not like they got screwed, especially since most of the island creation and subsequent development cost was funded by New Deal funds (Works Public Administration and Public Works Administration). The rest was supported by exhibition funds and the local governments.

    And keep in mind, that this was during WWII. The priorities were a little bit different then.

  49. Re:Smash U.S. imperialism! by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

    You think the government cared enough about Andrew Breitbart to kill him? That's hilarious.

    Or did the evil government force him to drink like a fish and sniff cocaine into his 40s?

  50. Re:Smash U.S. imperialism! by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

    Pat Tillman... are you nuts... global gangsta's?

    Ask your doc to increase you meds...

  51. Dear Slashdot, by Krigl · · Score: 1

    I've always enjoyed the bracketed indication of target domain behind links in discussion, I think it would be nice to implement this also for the main page. In some cases, wording indicates some inconspicous page and people tend to click links that actually lead to the pages like Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, which no self-respecting nerd should read (hint: If you can't include actual levels or link to the data you're not an Atomic Scientist but Alarmed Shill).

    --
    Troll 2.0 Fear my asocial networking!
  52. woosh by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    Can't tell if this is sarcasm.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  53. Advice fro the "bad guys" by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Get thee to a decomissioned Navy facility this very night, carrying a radiation detector in one hand, and a shovel in the other. Get out there and get those radiation sources dug up and into your safe hands before some irresponsible person comes along and "cleans them up"!

    You could probably even defend it as performing a public service. As long as you keep it separate from your dispersal device until just before you want to trigger your "dirty bomb".

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  54. Re:Fuck the Navy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember the Air Force used to be PART OF THE ARMY

    That's because planes are tanks that are really good at jumping.