Slashdot Mirror


The Next Keurig Will Make Your Coffee With a Dash of "DRM"

FuzzNugget writes "Apparently seeking to lock competitors out of the burgeoning single-serve coffee market, Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, maker of the popular Keurig coffee machines, will make their new machines work with licensed pods only. GMCR's CEO confirmed this in a statement: 'The much-anticipated ‘Keurig 2.0’ single-cup brewing system with ‘interactive readability’ (that doesn’t work with unlicensed/copycat pods) will offer such “game-changing functionality” that consumers - and unlicensed players - will want to switch.'"

769 comments

  1. Why? by B33rNinj4 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is it really so hard to just grind the beans and brew it yourself? I do this every morning.

    1. Re:Why? by jxander · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

      I guess we could all switch to a press ... but that's a bit messy and requires a stand alone heating method (I've not the space to keep a proper tea kettle on my office desk)

      Keurig provides a clean single-cup solution

      --
      This signature is false.
    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For personal use sure. For business use (the vast majority of Green Mountain Coffee customers), no that's not a viable solution. This will likely make businesses switch coffee makers (which die every couple of years from use) not make sure they get approved pods...

    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, do it for me.

    4. Re:Why? by key134 · · Score: 2

      Is it really so hard to just grind the beans and brew it yourself? I do this every morning.

      I vote for a french press. Though, an AeroPress in intriguing. I can't imagine the people using Keurigs are actually saving any money over just going to a place like Dunkin' Donuts.

    5. Re:Why? by hawguy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

      I guess we could all switch to a press ... but that's a bit messy and requires a stand alone heating method (I've not the space to keep a proper tea kettle on my office desk)

      Keurig provides a clean single-cup solution

      Just use an immersion heater in your coffee mug to heat the water before you dump it in the press.

    6. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My roommate in college got a Keurig, and then bought pods in bulk. I think it was like $0.50/K-cup he got, and he drank 2 a day, versus making a pot of coffee. If he went to the Starbucks on campus he would have paid $5 or so a day for his coffee consumption.

    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Somehow I just don't trust drinking my coffee that we brewed out of a Lexmark ink cartridge.

    8. Re:Why? by jratcliffe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can't imagine the people using Keurigs are actually saving any money over just going to a place like Dunkin' Donuts.

      Keurig machine is about $120. The pods are about $0.65 each (less if you buy in bulk, or on sale, etc.). Small coffee at DD is $1.49. So, you're saving about $0.85/cup. You cover the cost of the machine after about 140 cups, so you definitely are saving money, even more if you're comparing to buying at Starbucks.

    9. Re:Why? by nurb432 · · Score: 2

      Choice.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    10. Re:Why? by alphatel · · Score: 5, Informative

      Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

      I guess we could all switch to a press ... but that's a bit messy and requires a stand alone heating method (I've not the space to keep a proper tea kettle on my office desk)

      Keurig provides a clean single-cup solution

      Are you on crack? We boil water in an electric kettle in 2.5 minutes, then pour into a press, and blammo, coffee. Keurig provides stupid, bland, watery goop that doesn't leave you with a bunch of grinds to clean up. However, it is neither greener, nor more efficient or even easier really.

      --
      When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    11. Re:Why? by wiredlogic · · Score: 1, Troll

      There is always the option to give up on substance abuse.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    12. Re:Why? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Informative

      A Brazil press is microwave safe. Scratch the bottom to keep from super heating.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    13. Re:Why? by EMG+at+MU · · Score: 4, Informative

      Every coffee maker I have owned in the past 8 years has had a 1-4 cup option.

    14. Re:Why? by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

      I guess we could all switch to a press ... but that's a bit messy and requires a stand alone heating method (I've not the space to keep a proper tea kettle on my office desk)

      Keurig provides a clean single-cup solution

      It creates a lot of waste, though. Trendy, but not very green. Kind of like the personal electronics industry.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    15. Re:Why? by carlhaagen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's about the cost, not the coffee or the effort. High price tags attract people who suffer the "spender syndrome" - dishing out a lot of money on something even plain or generic gives these people a feeling of being above the average, being set aside from the rest of us, of enjoying something that is "exclusive" only to their kind.

      It's like when you find the exact same piece of generic furniture sold at (but not designed by) IKEA in some upstreet furniture shop - IKEA would call it "ROBUST" (or whatever) and sell it for $89, while the other "boutique" will call it "Multimedia bench in Nordic pinewood" at thrice the pricetag. People with money will buy it, and they will feel like they did a better deal than paying $89 at IKEA. It's one of the oldest tricks in the book of retail.

    16. Re:Why? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't forget the cost of your time. Traveling to DD or SB and standing in line for a cup of expensive coffee takes a lot of time (depending on how far you are from the nearest location). If you have your own machine at home, you can have a cup of coffee ready for you in the morning, taking no time at all (I assume the Keurig machines can be programmed to automatically brew a cup at a specified time; make sure you put a cup in place the night before though).

    17. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your point that making great coffee is already mind numbingly easy aside, the phrase "watery goop" simply doesn't parse.

    18. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Starbuck's Via is also a clean single-cup solution. It is cheaper, smaller and more dependable than the Keurig machine. It is also a format that would be very hard to add DRM, etc.
      Since Keurig wants to punish its customers, I will forgo their stupidity.
      Keurig, like Beta, sucks.

    19. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Self-Righteous Prig!

      I have CFS and need two cups of coffee (morning and afternoon) to function. Coffee is a blessing.
      Plus, Coffee is high in antioxidants and good for your heart.

    20. Re:Why? by dreamchaser · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not to mention that the Keurig doesn't make coffee that tastes anywhere near as good as fresh ground and brewed or pressed coffee.

    21. Re:Why? by wisnoskij · · Score: 4, Informative

      Coffee makers make a little or as much coffee as you want. If you want one cup, only put one cup or water and a proportionate amount of grounds. And you have the added benefit that while brewing many cups of Keurig is a linearly hard problem (meaning that it takes 20 times longer to brew 20 cups), conventional brewing is not.
      When you actually in a situation where you are brewing a lot of coffee, the conventional method becomes more efficient per cup.

      Any computer programmer should be able to tell you which is the overall more efficient solution for the general situation.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    22. Re:Why? by jxander · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does caffeine count as crack?

      No electric kettles in the office. Fire hazard (also no space heaters, or various other personal electronics). They probably shouldn't allow coffee pots either, but YOU try to tell a hundred or so office monkeys that they can't have coffee. Good luck. I suppose I could get a nice tea cosy to disguise the kettle... but like you said, then there's the grounds to deal with. Shaking the press doesn't really get much out of it, and the fire marshal REALLY frowns on my compost pile in my office.

      Keureg is hardly a perfect solution, but it's self contained and low maintenance.

      --
      This signature is false.
    23. Re:Why? by reboot246 · · Score: 0

      I buy green coffee beans for about $6 a pound. Then I roast them to perfection (or what I like). When I want coffee I grind what I need and brew it - using a French press for one cup or using an 8-cup brewer for more than one cup. I make my coffee stronger than most people do, but it still averages about 10 cents per cup.

      With K-cups you never know how old the coffee is or where it came from. I've had some that was delicious, but a lot that was yuck. I just kept quiet and never insulted the machine's owner.

    24. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Funny, seems pretty clear to me that it implies watery 'tasting', especially paired with the word bland.

      Was it really that hard to figure out?

    25. Re:Why? by m93 · · Score: 2

      A press has the downside that it can possibly elevate your cholesterol if you drink coffee regularly from it. Paper filters in the drip process absorb some of the oils present in the coffee (and thus, some of the flavor as well).

    26. Re:Why? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Is it really so hard to just grind the beans and brew it yourself? I do this every morning.

      It is if you don't want to wake up your three and five-year-olds. I'm sure there are quiet grinders, but all the ones I've used are very noisy and tend to wake up the house. Let sleeping kids lie.

      (Now granted, often the reason you're grinding coffee is *they've* woken you up, so that negates the first concern, but this usually brings up concern number two: The sound of a coffee grinder causes your children to break out in tears.)

      [Insert obligatory 'Another reason to not have children!' Slashdot post here.]

    27. Re:Why? by jxander · · Score: 2

      So, fun fact. I've recently come to terms with an ugly fact : I have a legitimate physical addiction to caffeine. If I go a full day without, I get headaches by the end of the day.

      Hardly the worst withdrawal symptoms ever, and defeated by some motrin and water ... but still, a bit upsetting. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to indulge my habit

      --
      This signature is false.
    28. Re:Why? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Plus, Coffee is high in antioxidants and good for your heart.

      You realize that some antioxidants are actually carcinogenic, and that increasing your intake of antioxidants may not have any healthful benefit, but may in fact be harming you?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    29. Re:Why? by ebh · · Score: 1

      You're talking about "cost of time" to a bunch of Slackware users?

    30. Re:Why? by thaylin · · Score: 1

      The caffeine not so much.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    31. Re:Why? by thaylin · · Score: 1

      And you probably would not have CFS if you got over your addition to caffeine http://www.reuters.com/article...

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    32. Re:Why? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Slackware users? Where on earth did you get that idea? Slashdot is mostly full of Windows and Mac users.

    33. Re:Why? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      If I went to Dunkin' I would have to pay for it. If I use the Keurig in the office, the company pays for it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    34. Re:Why? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      Also, Keurig coffee pods are hilariously expensive compared to other coffee. 8$ for 6 cups of coffee, or grind your own and get a gallon or two for the same price.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    35. Re:Why? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      I don't really care about antioxidants, one way or the other, but Your signature made me laugh out loud, so I just wanted to say thanks for that.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    36. Re:Why? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      Buy it pre-ground. Or grind it the day before. It's still likely to be fresher than some nasty little industrial capsule.

      I can may anywhere from 1-6 mugs of coffee with with a vintage Mr. Coffee machine and that's sufficient to satisfy the household caffeine addictions with only simple bio-degradable waste products (makes great garden mulch!)

      When that's not fancy enough, I have a mini espresso machine.

    37. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should read the comment that you commented on. That is, your comment really made no sense if you know what CFS is.
      Weighting the benefits of 2 cups of coffee helping someone with CFS and the risk of cancer from 2 cups is rather lopsided--coffee wins.

    38. Re:Why? by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Informative

      Um... Keurig sucks. I've had their coffee, it's expensive and tastes bland.

      I've been using this for nearly a decade: http://www.amazon.com/Melitta-...

      Taste great, 1 cup and I can use actual REAL coffee in it!
      also, in a pinch you can make one of these out of a paper cup by poking holes in it and sticking in a regular old filter. The key is not to make the holes too big so the cofee steeps in the hot water for long enough.

    39. Re:Why? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      ...generic furniture sold at (but not designed by) IKEA...

      I don't think IKEA sells generic things not designed by itself -- does it?

      I once bought a piece of used furniture at an antique store and then found it at IKEA for cheaper. I took it back to the antique store and re-bought it at the IKEA. I would have been stupid not to!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    40. Re:Why? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      Get out of here with your rational arguments! this is /.! we demand abuse, strawmen, and deliberate obtuseness!

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    41. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Self-Righteous Prig!

      That's redundant.

    42. Re:Why? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      is it the motrin, or the caffeine in your motrin? :)

    43. Re:Why? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is no cholesterol in coffee. Coffee does contain the molecule cafestol at about .06% by weight in each coffee bean, and cafestol has been correlated with increased 'bad' cholesterol, (but other positive health effects) and there has been no evidence that paper filters removes cafestol.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    44. Re:Why? by ynp7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Any computer programmer should also be able to tell you that programming computers requires at least one full pot of coffee, making a Keurig the worst possible solution ever.

    45. Re:Why? by wile_e8 · · Score: 1

      I have a French press at home and it's not that hard to use. But when I'm at work and I just need a cup of of coffee (which is often, at least until my son starts sleeping through the night), there is nothing as quick and convenient as my Keurig. Turn it on and a couple minutes later I have a cup of coffee with no mess to clean up. No, the quality of the coffee won't be as high as a press or other methods, but I'm not a coffee snob so it's fine as far as I can tell.

    46. Re:Why? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Glad to be of service!

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    47. Re:Why? by jxander · · Score: 2

      Doesn't that require a separate filter for each cup? And a tea kettle or some other 3rd party heating solution?

      --
      This signature is false.
    48. Re:Why? by Zalbik · · Score: 1

      Is it really so hard to just grind the beans and brew it yourself?

      It's obviously harder (more steps), so why not use a Keurig?

      I use a Keurig with a third-party reusable filter pod. This way I get the following benefits:
      1) I can use my own grinds.
      2) Less waste. I can easily brew exactly 10 oz
      3) Less cleaning as there is no coffee pot. Just cup & filter.
      4) Less counter space (than a press). No need for a separate kettle and press.
      5) Less energy as the Keurig keeps water insulated. If we make two cups of coffee within half an hour of each other, often there is little or no re-heating required.
      6) Built in water supply

      That being said, if Keurig goes down this path for all their machines, then when it breaks I'll likely just replace it with a press.

    49. Re:Why? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      Only if you buy the (thirty dollar) stainless steel refillable coffee pod, and then grind and brew your own.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    50. Re:Why? by jxander · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      Both ;)

      --
      This signature is false.
    51. Re:Why? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      However, it is neither greener, nor more efficient or even easier really.

      The "Green Mountain" in their company names refers to the piles of green dollars that they are making with this crap.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    52. Re:Why? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      If you want the 'convenience' of the K-Cup machines, they do make this hilariously expensive stainless steel refillable K-Cups you can pack with your own grounds. This is the only reason I can see owning one. (don't have to clean an entire coffee maker, just rinse out the little pod)

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    53. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

      I guess we could all switch to a press ... but that's a bit messy and requires a stand alone heating method (I've not the space to keep a proper tea kettle on my office desk)

      Keurig provides a clean single-cup solution

      Or use a Clever Coffee Dripper -- single-cup brew, ready in 4 minutes. It uses a cone paper filter, so there's no silt in your coffee. It's an easy clean-up, super simple to use, and makes a great cup of coffee with your own coffee grounds. More info here:

      http://www.sweetmarias.com/cle...

    54. Re:Why? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that, made my day.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    55. Re:Why? by NikeHerc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Keurig provides a clean single-cup solution ...

      Keurig coffee costs about $30/pound in the local big-name grocery store. I don't know which is worse: DRM or hideously overpriced coffee. I would avoid Keurig like the plague for either reason.

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    56. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't your time be better spent doing, well, anything other than spouting complete and utter bullshit on the internet?

    57. Re:Why? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      Grind it the night before and seal it in a zip bag, its not going to lose much of its flavor overnight, and will still be far better than commercially ground anything.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    58. Re:Why? by hawguy · · Score: 3, Funny

      So, fun fact. I've recently come to terms with an ugly fact : I have a legitimate physical addiction to caffeine. If I go a full day without, I get headaches by the end of the day.

      Hardly the worst withdrawal symptoms ever, and defeated by some motrin and water ... but still, a bit upsetting. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to indulge my habit

      For this reason, I included caffeine tablets in my 72-hour earthquake survival kit. I don't want to be fighting caffeine withdrawl at the same time I'm searching for shelter. I don't trust Starbucks to have emergency power and water plus enough beans in-stock to feed my addition in case of disaster.

    59. Re:Why? by mindwhip · · Score: 0

      Hundred or so? Why not be nice and install a decent quality vending machine with subsidised (even free) coffee? Not only does it mitigate the fire risks no one ever gets the chance to complain that someone before them took the last cup and didn't make more...

      And as for quality there are some really good machines out there that are better than some local coffee houses (assuming you fill it with a decent coffee)

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    60. Re:Why? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Are you on crack? We boil water in an electric kettle in 2.5 minutes, then pour into a press, and blammo, coffee.

      Your forgetting the grinding of the fresh beans to put in that press. Otherwise, your gratuitous snootiness is entirely pointless.

      Then you get to clean up both your grinder and your press. These activities don't happen on their own by magic.

      As "instant" goes, it's not bad really.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    61. Re:Why? by thaylin · · Score: 2

      So I come with an article with a study and it is complete and utter bs, as opposed to your counter argument with nothing but nonsense? Do you have a counter study?

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    62. Re:Why? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It parses perfectly well. There's an adjective, followed immediately by the noun it qualifies. This is the normal(adj) structure(n) in English, you ignorant(adj) oik(n).

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    63. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Electric kettles in your office huh? Sounds pretty stupid are PC/Laptop power supplies in your office also banned? No? Bigger fire risk there.

    64. Re:Why? by ttucker · · Score: 5, Informative

      I brew my coffee in a press every morning. It takes about 3 minutes to boil, brew, and clean, an AeroPress.

      http://aerobie.com/products/ae...

    65. Re:Why? by medv4380 · · Score: 1

      Yes that is too hard. I only drink instant at home. Brewing, even pod brewing, is far too much work.

    66. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so do a pour over through a filter, takes just as long as a press and uses a filter.

    67. Re:Why? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Two more things:car analogies, nice red uniforms, and aqueducts!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    68. Re:Why? by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      Is it really so hard to just grind the beans and brew it yourself? I do this every morning.

      I totally agree. These machines make crap coffee for a massive premium price. They are the ink-jet printers of coffee. And I despise the amount of waste produced.

      I use an espresso machine and a decent grinder to make Americano's in the morning...it takes a very short period of time, probably comparable to the kuereg. A cappuccino takes a bit longer with milk steaming, but still fairly fast. And I get a lovely crema which tastes oh so good.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    69. Re:Why? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

      When it comes to a coffee pot, the standard "cup" is actually 5 ounces.

      I have a 4 cup coffee pot in my office. It's trivially easy to brew one actual cup (roughly 12 ounces) of coffee whenever I want it.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    70. Re:Why? by ttucker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He probably has a conical burr grinder, which requires no cleanup at all.

    71. Re:Why? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Buy it pre-ground. Or grind it the day before. It's still likely to be fresher than some nasty little industrial capsule.

      No. You've completely ruined it. At that point, the results you get from the "icky industrialized capsule" will probably be better rather than worse.

      Coffee grinds go bad pretty much immediately.

      Americans are such idiots when it comes to coffee.

      What most people put into a Mr. Coffee pretty much tastes like garden mulch.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    72. Re:Why? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have an inductive hot water pot, it is about as safe as anything possible. You tell me it is a fire hazard, and I'll find a dozen more likely sources in your office.

      The only thing that gets hot is the water pot portion. And it is separated from the induction base, which remains coolish. An Incandescent (you remember those?) bulb is hotter.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    73. Re:Why? by glavenoid · · Score: 1

      This right here. Single cup of whatever happens to be my favorite coffee of choice at the moment, brewed to my exact specifications (many data gathered after *extensive* testing), with minimal muss and minimal fuss. As much as I like other brewing methods (moka pot, French press, Turkish coffee, other "hipster" methods...) this single-cup drip method takes the cake for excellent taste and convenience.

      --
      I, for one, am looking forward to the inevitable /. beta rollout fallout.
    74. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you're saying makes no sense at all. If a capsule machine and its daily capsules' cost is less than you earn during 5 minutes of your time, you earn more than enough to not really need to care for those 5 minutes wasted on making a real cup of coffee. If anything, these machines would be for people who DESPERATELY need coffee to function, but can't afford being late 5 minutes out of risk of losing their jobs, like a waiting job or other servicing job, but these are not the people who buy machines like this. Guess again who buy these machines. Hint: it's not people with too little time, and not people with too little money.

    75. Re:Why? by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      There are some indications that coffee actually reduces your risk of some cancers.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    76. Re:Why? by ttucker · · Score: 1

      It is almost like brewing coffee is not really that complicated at all.

    77. Re:Why? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      No way Billy! Ikea never sells anything with a name like Robust. It would be something more like Gesaalt, or Ivani or Kompactor or something. Never a simple word like Robust.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    78. Re:Why? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Also, Keurig coffee pods are hilariously expensive compared to other coffee. 8$ for 6 cups of coffee, or grind your own and get a gallon or two for the same price.

      That's rather overpriced, I don't want to know where you shop. The most expensive I see is $13 for 18 cups of coffee (or around 70 cents per cup).

      Costco and other sell knockoff compatible pods for far less - a box of 40 for $20 or less, or even bulk pod packs.

      Of course, you could also use the $20 thing to use your own grinds. Just requires a bit more cleaning up.

    79. Re:Why? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Maybe my knowledge is out of date, but I read that studies showed boiled coffee raised cholesterol and drip coffee did not. Perhaps the paper absorption bit is speculation, but there's no question that French press coffee contains more cafestol than drip.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    80. Re:Why? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your forgetting the grinding of the fresh beans to put in that press.

      I outsource the grinding of my coffee. I like to think it's brocken up into small pieces by an army of underpaid 3rd world seratshop labourers equipped with tiny mallettes. However, the blurb on the back of the many packets of ready-ground coffee do not confirm or deny this.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    81. Re:Why? by operagost · · Score: 1

      A coffeemaker doesn't brew 8 different cups of coffee. It brews the same cup 8 times. A Keurig can brew a french roast, a decaf, a blonde roast, French vanilla, and so on.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    82. Re:Why? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It would take me a lot more than 5 minutes to drive out of my way to a Starbucks, find a place to park (good luck with that around here during the morning commute) and then sit in line for a cup of coffee. Maybe you happen to have one of these places directly on your commute, but not everyone does.

    83. Re:Why? by ttucker · · Score: 1

      You should really try the AeroPress. I used to be a diehard french press guy, but I am not looking back.

    84. Re:Why? by glavenoid · · Score: 1

      Not the guy you responded to but I use and am a big fan of the same thing.

      Doesn't that require a separate filter for each cup?

      Yeah, but they're cheap and very convenient for preparation and clean-up.

      And a tea kettle or some other 3rd party heating solution?

      Yes, but once you know how long it takes for e.g. a microwave to safely get a certain amount of water to the optimal temperature for a single serving it takes a very short amount of time. I know my microwave at home takes 2 min to get 12 oz of cold water to the perfect brewing temp.

      Also I know that the particular vessel I use to microwave water has nucleation points which allows the water to safely come to a roiling boil which keeps the water from superheating and exploding.

      --
      I, for one, am looking forward to the inevitable /. beta rollout fallout.
    85. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gentoo would have been a more appropriate choice here.

    86. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The My K Cup accessory ($10) allows you to use your own ground beans. It essentially makes the Keurig into an espresso machine. Wonder if Keurig will discontinue this accessory and make it incompatible with the new version.

    87. Re:Why? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      While I'm sure I'd appreciate your coffee, it's beyond what I need. It just needs to be decent. That said, I don't have a Keurig, and most of what I've sampled is too weak for me. We do have a "Flavia" machine at work, and it produces some decent enough coffee - or at least much better than the slop they were brewing before in the industrial drip machine. I also have a Nespresso machine at home, and I'm happy with the espresso it makes. It makes no sense for me to buy coffee beans, since I only make coffee on weekends... they'd go stale before I used them. The little hermetically sealed pods last longer and the machine is ridiculously simple to use. Most espresso machines are more sensitive to how you use it, and cost a lot more.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    88. Re:Why? by msauve · · Score: 2

      " it's not like I can go and buy ground coffee, is it? Oh wait ......"

      I hear they even sell it in convenient, single use containers, so it's always somewhat fresh.

      Have we completed the circle?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    89. Re:Why? by ThatsLoseNotLoose · · Score: 2

      Where do you shop? Costco has them around $0.35 per pod. Even The super premium brands are under $1 per cup.

    90. Re:Why? by X10 · · Score: 1

      Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

      Does it? My espresso machine gives me one fresh cup of espresso for one serving of freshly ground beans.

      --
      no, I don't have a sig
    91. Re:Why? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      No. You've completely ruined it. At that point, the results you get from the "icky industrialized capsule" will probably be better rather than worse.

      I take it you've never had capsule coffee then.

      Espresso is a remarkably unrelaible way of making a good beveradge. When it works and you get everything right, it's great, bu tit's really easy to get wrong.

      A press on the other hand is amazingly reliable. You can still get a pleasant cup out of long-ago ground beans. Might not be quite as good as 100% fresh, but easily good enough, probably substantially better than capsule coffee and much cheaper too.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    92. Re:Why? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You posted no study. You posted a popular press article about a study that may or may not be worth the paper it is printed on. Based on what you posted we have no way to know. The word 'suggesting' was used, but being written by a normal reporter, I'm sure she got _everything_ wrong.

      No confidence factors, telling a group (Mormons) what they want to hear, psychology journal, self reported alertness. I'm going with bad study until I see some raw data.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    93. Re:Why? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have not tried the Keurig but other coffee pod machines I have used and owned produce single cups of pretty damn good coffee, complete with frothed milk, and there is basically zero mess. No mucking about with filters and pots and grinding up beans and aerating milk and all that crap.

      Okay, if I could be bothered I could brew a slightly better cup the traditional way. But with pods I have variety and almost zero effort, ideal for work. It's a very small compromise for a very big gain.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    94. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Costco and other sell knockoff compatible pods for far less - a box of 40 for $20 or less, or even bulk pod packs.

      Isn't that what this article is about? You won't be able to use "knockoff" brands because of DRM, err, excuse me, PRM (physical rights management).

    95. Re:Why? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Printer ink suggests that most people just want cheap, it's only manufacturers that want to charge more for red dye than human blood. The coffee pods are a big part of their revenue, no need to let anyone else in on that.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    96. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pour through cone filter. Make as many or as few cups as you want.

    97. Re:Why? by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      That's why Keurig have partnered with Epsom.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    98. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ.

      I personally, and many of my colleagues agree, k-cup coffee is way better tasting than brewing yourself. The other plus is being that we all have different tastes, we all get a cup of coffee we like. Not fighting over weather we should use light or dark roast, Folgers or another brand, etc.

    99. Re:Why? by thaylin · · Score: 1
      I never said I posted a study, I said I posted an article with a study, however you can also see it at http://www.bris.ac.uk/news/201..., or crap even here http://science.slashdot.org/st....

      Of course it took 30 seconds to google and find the actual study http://www.nature.com/npp/jour...

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    100. Re:Why? by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Then wean yourself off. If you restrict yourself to moderate consumption on alternate days you will break the cycle.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    101. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      One word: Aeropress.

    102. Re:Why? by Onuma · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same boat. It's really only detrimental when I have some kind of upset stomach and don't want to upset it further. But given about 24-36 hours without a cup, I'm in nearly-migraine mode.

      I actually broke that addiction 3 years ago. Obviously temporarily. But for an entire week I was not a pleasant person to be around...my wife never wants me to go through caffeine withdrawal again, so she helps keep the supply going instead :D

      --
      What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?
    103. Re:Why? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I use a simple solution: I simply brew less coffee when I want less. In fact I usually just brew espresso shots. mmmmmm.

      Keurig creates a tremendous amount of waste and is a lot more expensive than conventional methods and that is the reason they are pushing it so hard - why sell you high quality beans in bulk when they can charge you 10x more for crappy grounds or freeze-dried coffee concentrate?

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    104. Re:Why? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I know people who were like that. Couldn't function without a lot of caffeine. Cut the caffeine to 1 cup a day and after about a week their energy went *way* above what it used to be. Apparently the first week is hell, but it gets much better after that. Caffeine is like most drugs, the more you take it, the less it works.

      Also, I'm pretty sure the amount of caffeine you are ingesting (which has been shown to cause heart problems, especially in high quantities like what you are taking) is more than making up for any antioxidants you may be getting.

    105. Re:Why? by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      Screw Keurig. I got one of their machines for Christmas. Damned thing has already stopped working.

      Going back to that 10 year old Mr. Coffee brewer.

      It was convenient, but the aggravation of maintaining that piece of junk is not worth it.

    106. Re:Why? by ixuzus · · Score: 1

      You produced an article about at study essentially about caffeine withdrawals which is nothing particularly new. Perhaps I missed something but I see nothing there to back up your assertion that "you probably would not have CFS if you got over your addition to caffeine". Try actually backing up your assertions before calling for rebuttals. Out of curiosity, do you actually know anyone with severe CFS?

    107. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say aeropress is amazing. It uses a tiny bit more coffee grounds from what I can tell and I'm not sure what I'd do if I was going to brew 5 or 6 cups for guests... but other than that it is perfect. Basically the only time it takes is the time for the water to boil. You eject the puck of spoiled grounds at the end of filling your cup and that ejection pretty much cleans the tube out. Just give it a two second rinse under the sink and put it in the drying rack.

    108. Re:Why? by almitydave · · Score: 1

      So, fun fact. I've recently come to terms with an ugly fact : I have a legitimate physical addiction to caffeine. If I go a full day without, I get headaches by the end of the day.

      Hardly the worst withdrawal symptoms ever, and defeated by some motrin and water ... but still, a bit upsetting. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to indulge my habit

      For this reason, I included caffeine tablets in my 72-hour earthquake survival kit. I don't want to be fighting caffeine withdrawl at the same time I'm searching for shelter. I don't trust Starbucks to have emergency power and water plus enough beans in-stock to feed my addition in case of disaster.

      That's smart. I'm addicted to caffeine (taken in coffee form) as well, but it's not that hard to break. I've done it a couple times, once voluntarily; more recently when I had the flu and lost all taste for coffee (only took a couple days to get back).

      The abuse of this particular substance doesn't amount to much, and there are benefits, so I'm not particularly worried. I might be a little crabby for the first couple days of the apocalypse.

      Re the Keurig - they're just looking for revenue streams post-K-cup-patent-expiration. I predict this approach will fail, when competing manufacturers continue to make cheap coffee makers compatible with the massive selection of currently-available cheap K-cups. I love our Keurig, but it's already made coffee stupidly simple; there's just no need for anything better.

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
    109. Re:Why? by camg188 · · Score: 1

      Coffee is high in antioxidants and good for your heart.

      Self-Righteous Prig!

      I had to give up caffeine because it was causing me to have heart arrhythmia.

    110. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a time before Beta when the best linux distro was Slackware. Gentoo took over for a long time, but now all the fanboys are Ubuntu, Mac, and Windows users. I'm still running FreeBSD after all these years

    111. Re:Why? by rnturn · · Score: 1

      Brew the pot of coffee, fill up your travel mug, and put the rest in a thermos. You can take it to work to share with a co-worker or have a second or third cup yourself. I found that the coffee I brewed myself and took to the office always tasted better than the drek they sold for an extortionate price down in the cafeteria. Even worse, they switched to Starbucks. [gag]

      Sorry, Keurig... I've tried your coffee and didn't like it. Didn't care for the non-biodegradable waste, either.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    112. Re:Why? by retchdog · · Score: 2

      Drip brewing doesn't really scale well, since it takes time for the grounds to saturate, and a small amount of grounds will form a thin layer; both of these make the percolation happen too fast. Also, the first cup of water won't be quite hot enough for good coffee, unless you have a very good drip machine. (Most drip machines don't heat the water enough, but it's even worse for small amounts of water.)

      A coffee maker intended for 4-6 cups can make a single cup, but it'll be pretty shitty. Use a press, cone, or single-serve drip machine.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    113. Re:Why? by r.freeman · · Score: 1

      Is it really so hard to just grind the beans and brew it yourself? I do this every morning.

      You know, doesn't this really grin your gears?

    114. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      insightful to point out that buying 1 commercial single serve coffee can be cheaper than buying a different single serve coffee??

      how about you buy 20lbs of ground coffee, make it in a $5 glass pot coffee machine that uses disposable paper filters and you're making back 5 times as much money or more, and you never had to blow the $120 in the first place.

      #MORONS

    115. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this marked insightful? Funny I can see but ... really?

    116. Re:Why? by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

      If grinding and brewing is too tough get a super automatic espresso machine. Better long term purchase than a Keurig. Unground beans and water in and espresso out at the push of a button.

      http://www.amazon.com/DeLonghi...

      Sure it is 700-800 bucks but if you like coffee it is AWESOME (my wife and I drink a lot of coffee). The only problem is all other coffee tastes like old dishwater after you have one of these.

    117. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Goop" implies something thick of viscous (like viscosity, not aggression), while "watery" implies the opposite.

      It seems to have been a joke.

    118. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's niche is offices and lobbies where grinding up a bowl of Joe isn't a great idea...

    119. Re:Why? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Did you bother to read it?

      They shot themselves down. Surprisingly honest in the discussion.

      Their study _failed_ to show caffeine increasing alertness in non-regular users. Which tells me their measure of alertness is broken.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    120. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good to hear someone finally admitting that Beta sucked. VHS4eva!

    121. Re:Why? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      There are some indications that coffee actually reduces your risk of some cancers.

      Well, sure - there are also indications that Roe v Wade resulted in lowered crime rates 17 - 20 years after the decision was made.

      Both situations seem like a 'correlation does not equal causation' sorta thing to me - not that "A causes B" so much as "A may be a contributing factor to B"

      Side note: with XP's marketshare declining, isn't it about rime to update your sig?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    122. Re:Why? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Pro-tip, the coffee grinder is surprisingly muffled just by setting it on two potholders. Even more if you put one over the top as well.

      Or you can pre-grind.

    123. Re:Why? by technomom · · Score: 1

      That does end after a while (the headaches, typical withdrawal symptoms). Maybe it's the age, but I found that my caffeine tolerance went down considerably after age 40. I found that it would keep me up at night and actually started having some anxiety issues as well - namely unexplained heart palpitations, shortness of breath. Cutting caffeine down by drinking only decaf coffee or herbal teas helped dramatically. Yes, I had some headaches as I started down the decaf path, but after a few weeks, those subsided. Yes, I know that decaf isn't necessarily good for me either, but I still love the taste of coffee and my brain still believes that it is waking up from the coffee. Go figure.

    124. Re:Why? by technomom · · Score: 1

      Great, except for the fact that it is Starbucks coffee, which I find overpriced and unnecessarily bitter.

    125. Re:Why? by jxander · · Score: 3, Funny

      Plus, I can tell everyone in the office that I'm going for a Brazilian.

      --
      This signature is false.
    126. Re:Why? by thaylin · · Score: 1

      And your thought is not very scientific. You dont have to increase it in every group for the addiction to allow it to be raised in a single group. It is a good assumption, but nothing more than that without further studies. Almost every person I know who is a non drinker is more alert than almost any coffee drinker I know. even after their addiction, and that is more scientific than your assertion.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    127. Re:Why? by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny

      Telling me I can't have my coffee in the morning is more of a fire hazard. I'll let you figure out why.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    128. Re:Why? by psyclone · · Score: 1

      Or you could get an Aero Press

    129. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

      So you've never seen, or even heard of, a single cup plunger?

      Before the US decided to vandalise coffee by making those horrendous dripolater things popular, most coffee was brewed and served a cup at a time.

    130. Re:Why? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      disc: I'm a bit of a coffee/espresso snob. I rebuilt my espresso machine and used my own wiring, controller (hw+fw) and interface to manage it.

      ok, that out of the way, I used my own gear for several years and it was fully manual (old style espresso machine, grinder, etc). the problem with grinders for home use is grinding enough for the shot but not having left overs. in 15mins, its stale (technically).

      I tried a super-auto (which grinds on the spot, one shot and no more) and that does it all. grinds, tamps, brews, dumps, cleans. tl;dr: its cool, get one, stop doing things the old way and have one machine on the counter instead of 3 (grinder, maker, puck dumper).

      saeco uses a single brew engine that you clean (rinse) when you want to. best idea I ever saw wrt coffee makers. totally convinced me to convert over. even though I wrote my own software, did the hardware redesign, etc etc. theirs was still better (and mine was damned good, mind you).

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    131. Re:Why? by jxander · · Score: 1

      Any computer programmer should be able to tell you which is the overall more efficient solution for the general situation.

      Well, I'm not a programmer, but that's exactly the point I was making.

      For my general situation, K Cups are the most efficient solution. No filters to mess with. No grounds to measure. No water to measure (reservoir unit). Near instant cleanup (k cup into the trash). I only need a single cup in the morning. Maybe another in the afternoons. Occasionally a guest makes a cup. So for me, something like Keurig is the best solution. I wouldn't rule out some other flavor of 1-shot coffee maker, and this DRM (how is a physical object subject to digital rights?) situation might cause me to lean away for my next purchase ... but for now this one is working like a champ.

      --
      This signature is false.
    132. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's "messy" to use a press, you're a fucking idiot and Keurig deserves your money more than you do, fucking idiot.

    133. Re:Why? by jxander · · Score: 1

      (many data gathered after *extensive* testing),

      with minimal muss and minimal fuss

      Does not compute. Either the coffee solution requires EXTENSIVE testing, or it requires minimal muss/fuss.

      These things seem mutually exclusive, unless you're suggesting a large front loaded muss and fuss ... which I would decline.

      --
      This signature is false.
    134. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because it's simply not possible for me to grind fewer beans and use less water to make less coffee....

    135. Re:Why? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      if you are ever unsure about the amount of coffee you drink, you should probably have more.

      I think my philosophy is much better than yours. DAMMIT!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    136. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, it parses but is meaningless. Goop is by definition thick. Describing it with watery means it's no longer goop. Maybe if it was not homogenous it would work, like a damp dry biscuit.

    137. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you on? They make 4 "cup" (2 mug) coffee makers for $20. Fill half full and you have 1 mug to go.

    138. Re:Why? by Dastardly · · Score: 0

      Use a reusable pod and fill it with the coffee of your choice. Ground yourself or pre-ground. It takes a little more time. And, there are some tricks. Like since the water flows fairly quickly through small cup a fine grind is a good idea.

    139. Re:Why? by omtinez · · Score: 1

      If you are going down that rabbit hole, you might as well talk about the cost of electricity consumed by that Keurig machine. Oh and also factor in the time of putting the cup in place and washing the cup later on, and don't forget to add however many seconds it takes you to program the machine, since we are talking about time...

    140. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Natalie Portman and grits no longer make the list ?

    141. Re:Why? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Is it really so hard to just grind the beans and brew it yourself? I do this every morning.

      is it really so hard to just keep chickens in your backyard and gather their eggs for breakfast? seriously, some people think your a lazy ass slacker for not doing so.

    142. Re:Why? by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      Use a reusable pod and fill it with the coffee of your choice. Ground yourself or pre-ground. It takes a little more time. And, there are some tricks. Like since the water flows fairly quickly through small cup a fine grind is a good idea.

      But could you do that if the coffee pot maker used DRM to insure that you only use recommended pods? How could they allow reusable pods? I mean geeze, you could put anything in there. (Specifically, a competing product.)

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    143. Re:Why? by Dastardly · · Score: 1

      Hilariously expensive?

      I guess the Keurig one at $10 might be, but there are several for $5 or less. In just 100 uses you are talking a nickel or less without the waste.

    144. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the programmers that don't know how to keep themselves healthy.

    145. Re:Why? by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      From memory it was Steven Levitt of Freakonomics Fame who drew the inference between abortion rights and crime statistics. He has an extraordinary way of looking at the world.

      The sig started out as "In an NT World", "Metro" doesn't have the same 'ring' to it, the cadence is wrong. Tempted to go back to the original.

      At the time I originally came up with it, I was bombarded constantly with how Apple was going out of business - Dell's statement that they should return the money to the shareholders was not the most pointed remark along that line. It's almost funny that they are currently one of, if not the, most valuable companies on the planet.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    146. Re:Why? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

      I guess we could all switch to a press ... but that's a bit messy and requires a stand alone heating method (I've not the space to keep a proper tea kettle on my office desk)

      Keurig provides a clean single-cup solution

      Erm, no.

      Just get an espresso machine (pump) and make cups as needed. Buy pre-ground beans if you're lazy, it'll still give you better quality control than pod machines.

      Once you get the hang of it, making coffee in an espresso machine will be just as fast as using a pod machine and much better tasting.

      I'm no coffee snob, but pod machine coffee is not real coffee. The kind of swill that gloops from those machines are no better than instant.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    147. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's horrible! You should never support sweatshop labor for coffee grinding! The drippy jerks will sweat into your coffee! I only buy my coffee from Russian mobsters who use enslaved Ukrainians and keep costs down by not buying fuel for the winter.

    148. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is a single cup machine something special in the US?

      Around here (Germany) they are very common with a large variety of makers. Personally I prefer pads over capsules because they are cheaper, standardised, there's a larger variety of coffees available and every super market has them.

    149. Re:Why? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      I've got a coffee machine that grinds the beans and does single servings. I hate the waste generate by the Keurigs.

    150. Re:Why? by pellik · · Score: 1

      That only works until you learn how bad consumer grade espresso machines are.

    151. Re:Why? by mendax · · Score: 1

      Is it really so hard to just grind the beans and brew it yourself? I do this every morning.

      Grind the beans? Well, I don't drink coffee that much so I'll stick with the ground coffee I buy from Starbucks or Peets. But I use a small four-cup drip drip maker I've had for well over a decade. It's not quite as simple as the Keurig system but it's pretty simple. Empty old filter and grounds into trash, insert filter, scoop in coffee, pour in water, turn on switch, wait.

      Historically, there have been easier and cleaner ways of making coffee not dissimilar to the Keurig system. I have vivid memories of my Ohio grandparent's coffee percolator gurgling and growling early in the morning. Those machines used circular filter pouches not unlike oversized tea bags and many coffee producers sold them. What they poured out smelled wonderful and tasted awful. Coffee making as gotten better.

      --
      It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
    152. Re:Why? by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      Some are, and overuse of free radical scavengers can harm you.

      But we're talking about coffee, not generic antioxidants like BHT. Coffee contains some antioxidants, but also B2 and B5, and caffeine.

    153. Re:Why? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      This is /.

      What are the odds you are a hot chick?

      Everybody goes ewwwww.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    154. Re:Why? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      The aeropress is much easier to clean up than a french cup.-- unscrew the filter cap and press the "puck" of compressed grounds into the garbage.
      Disadvantage: I use the inverted method, as the water tends to go right through the grounds and filter otherwise. Tip: When using the inverted method,pour the water through the funnel, as it keeps the grounds from floating into the filter cap thread.

    155. Re:Why? by linuxbert · · Score: 2

      you must have a tiny-ass mug then. I Have a Cuisinart maker that grinds, and has a 4 cup setting, which perfectly fills my travel mug.

      that is by biggest complaint about the Keurig - to fill a decent size mug, you need 2 cups on the large setting. at that point you get into the Buy at coffee shop kinda price per cup.

    156. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A licensed third-party machine can be about $59. The Mr. Coffee one works well.

    157. Re:Why? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Are those single use containers biodegradable?

      Just asking because those pods otherwise generate a lot of landfill.

      I brew loose leaf tea. teabags don't compost - I pick them out of the compost bin intact after a year of decomposition of all the organic matter.

    158. Re:Why? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      I always buy fair-trade. The mallet workers get 4 weeks annual leave. :-)

    159. Re:Why? by hawguy · · Score: 3, Funny

      you must have a tiny-ass mug then. I Have a Cuisinart maker that grinds, and has a 4 cup setting, which perfectly fills my travel mug.

      that is by biggest complaint about the Keurig - to fill a decent size mug, you need 2 cups on the large setting. at that point you get into the Buy at coffee shop kinda price per cup.

      I think you meant to reply to the grandparent poster. I don't have a tiny-ass mug, I have a tiny ass-mug.

    160. Re:Why? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      I liken it to inkjet printers. Manufacturers realised that the money wasn't it the printer but in the ink. Then local suppliers offered 'no name' cartridges, so they put DRM on the ink cartridge. Buy a laser printer - it will cost more in the short term but over a decade of use will save you money!

      Similarly, one of those fully automated Saeco or Jura machines where you just load the beans into the top produces, IMHO, a better tasting coffee than the cheap Nespresso we had at work.

    161. Re:Why? by ne0n · · Score: 1

      Wish I had mod points, this is the right answer to any questions the Keurig might provoke. Aeropresses are more versatile too, you can make half a cup if you want.

      --
      $ :(){ :|:& };:
    162. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess if you are not considered about bpa free kcups then stream those kcups

    163. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (like viscosity, not aggression)

      lol
      that would be vicious, then, not viscous. damn, english is my 3rd language and even i know this.

    164. Re:Why? by msauve · · Score: 1

      Are the common plastic/paper layered coffee bags biodegradable? The steel/chrome plated cans? The plastic 3 lb containers? The hermetic aluminum/plastic sealed bags? Why does bio degradable make a difference? Why not chemi-degradable? Does how long it takes to turn to dust matter to the equation? Does something somehow have less mass once it's been bio-degraded?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    165. Re:Why? by Xtifr · · Score: 2

      You and your colleagues have horrible taste! :p

      As for the just-one-cup issue, there are dozens of other options, from single-use filters to single-cup-size presses to simple espresso machines. I have a press that doubles as a travel cup.

      Folgers or another brand, etc.

      I rest my case on the horrible taste issue. No one with any taste in coffee would ever mention Folgers, except as a how-NOT-to! :D

    166. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other thing about the 2.0 system.. will I still be able to use reusable pods? I save tons of money by just using the reusable ones, even Keurig themselves make one:

      http://www.keurig.com/accessories/my-k-cup

      As of now, you can pry my v 1.0 out of my cold dead hands.

    167. Re:Why? by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha. Delusional. I have a very nice heirloom quality "conical burr grinder" and you WILL clean it every six months or so. Hopefully you'll be outside because the mess that rests in there is going to get everywhere.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    168. Re:Why? by thaylin · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you followed the rest of the chain you would have see a link to the study, and the article is not about caffeine withdrawal, try reading it.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    169. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't stereotype everyone like that. Prior to getting a Keurig I didn't drink that much coffee at home for one reason or another - even though I had a coffee pot and gave it a try. I had switched to just buying unsweet tea by the gallon at my local BBQ or Chicken drive-thrus and drinking that.

      I thought I'd give the Keurig a try after seeing all those flavors. I picked one up as well as several different flavors of K-Cups. I almost never drink 4-8 cups of the same flavor of coffee throughout the day.. I'll typically change it up between flavors. I love that.

      As far as effort, yeah that does matter to me because I typically don't like waiting too long. In fact, having to fill up the reservoir when it runs dry has convinced me to buy one of the business models that allows for a filtered connection to my water line. I have not done so yeah, but it's on the list of things to do.

      So... 1) I enjoy the variety of flavors, even if the flavors are not the 'best'...they are good enough for me - I mean I drank gallon drive-thru tea instead of loose leaf or Teavana stuff for the most part.

      2) I don't like to wait for my coffee, even if it is JUST for the first cup from a brewed pot.

      The second one I could, and have adapted to based upon where I was, so it's a MINOR issue, as long as we are talking about traditional pots and scoops - I won't french press or grind coffee although I have done that before.

      The first one, however, means I'll stick to a Keurig for a while, as that choice of flavors, one cup at a time, is great to have.

      The main issue that some people may have with Keurigs is price. If you are a person that doesn't care for variety throughout the day (can drink the same flavor or black 4 or more cups in a row) or enjoys using a french press/other method, then yeah - there's not a big draw for a Keurig for you.

      The other issue is that it's the norm to disparage people that are different from you - typically claiming they are some form of hipster, anti-hipster, show-off, or whatever. I like it for my own reasons, it's cool that you like other methods for your reasons. You and I aren't the same people.

    170. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the gallons of tea that I buy from Bill Miller's BBQ and Chicken Express aren't as good as loose leaf/Teavana stuff, but it works for me.

      'good enough'

    171. Re:Why? by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      I did, too, for years. I used a single-cup cone and filter with freshly ground beans. There's really not much difference, and the Keurig approach is a whole lot cleaner.

      COST: About the same per cup. Unless you buy from the local market for $1.00 a cup, you ought to be able to get the K-cups for about 35 cents or so apiece. Compare this to buying a pound of coffee at fair trade prices (about $13.00 per pound where I am) and for a single cup a day you go through about that much. You're going to pay some serious money for a good grinder (not those horrid centrifugal force pieces of crap that break every year) the same as you'll pay for a Keurig machine. So on a cost per cup basis if you're a single-cup-person, it's about the same cost to run either way.

      QUALITY: If you're getting "watery goop" (as one said here) change your brand. K-Cups can brew excellent quality coffee--or not--your choice. Shop around and go for "bold" brands and you ought to do fine.

      CLEANLINESS: Keurig hands-down. No muss, no fuss. No time needed. Spill a cone full of hot coffee and you've got yourself a disaster. Been there; done that more than once. Unless you have hard water, Keurig runs clean.

      I've had my Keurig for two years or so after having done the cone atop the cup trip for several decades. I spend no more on coffee than I used to. For those of you who brew pots and drink lots, a Keurig makes no sense and is way too expensive. But if you are content with a wake-me-up cup most days, a Keurig makes a lot of sense and is cost-equivalent to other ways of brewing.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    172. Re:Why? by seebs · · Score: 1

      I dunno about "so hard", but it's more effort and attention than I want to give to the process, and I usually only want one cup in any given many-hour period. With the keurig, I put a cup in the thing, put a pod in it, push a button, and sometime later I have a cup of coffee which is done. I don't have to deal with the horrible noises or maintenance of grinders, and so on.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    173. Re:Why? by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Do you work in a Chines Firework factory or something? My office has about 100 people and we have 2 Starbucks machines in our cafeteria. That's in addition to 5 Microwaves, a convection oven (no conventional oven), dishwasher, and even a toaster oven. Any office/warehouse/shop/etc.. with more than a couple workers will have a break room where something can be plugged in.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    174. Re:Why? by nctritech · · Score: 1

      Get a thermoblock espresso maker. Fill the metal basket with a scoop of normal grounds. Put enough water in the tank to fill the mug up. Put your mug where the decanter goes (or use the decanter as an intermediate cup if there's not enough space) and flip the switch. Bam, poor man's Keurig. Been doing it for six years.

    175. Re:Why? by ttucker · · Score: 1

      Get a modern one. I wipe coffee oil off of the grinding part of mine about twice a year. No mess rests inside, it just grinds coffee into a hopper.

    176. Re:Why? by Rufty · · Score: 1

      Aeropress? Yes, seconded.

      --
      Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
    177. Re:Why? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      My wife bought a reusable "Keurig" pod. You fill it up with your favorite ground coffee (or grind your own if you like and put it in the pod). Then, you put the pod in the Keurig, brew your single cup of coffee, clean out the pod (it's dishwasher safe) and reuse it. We buy big containers of coffee at BJ's that last her for months instead of spending the same amount of money for about two weeks' worth of pods.

      As far as these "DRM-pods" go, we'll stick with our "DRM-less" Keurig. (Which we only got because we won it.) Should we need to replace it, there are other, similar devices. If Keurig tries to lock people in to only using "Official Keurig Approved Pods", we'll go with another coffee maker that doesn't limit our use.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    178. Re:Why? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      I guess I forgot about the added tax for living at the end of the civilized world. The only local place that carries the stainless K-Cups has them at 35$.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    179. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

      First, that's an actual Cup as in liquid measure, most small coffee mugs hold two to three Cups of liquid.
      Second, if you only want one mug of coffee, just put 3 cups of water into the reservoir and only grind half as many beans. Single mug of "Joe", a lot cheaper, less plastic waste.
      Third, most people don't just drink one mug of coffee.

      I had this argument with my wife. I gave in, she got a Keurig. After she realized we were going through a half dozen "K-Cups" a day (or more) and spending ten times as much on coffee, which in general was not nearly as tasty, we sold it on Craig's List and went back to our simple, low-tech machine. And yes, we tried using the little "refill it with your own grounds" cups, which are cheaper in the long run but are a lot more of a pain in the ass because you have to clean them after each use and refill, and the screens get gunked up and break over time, and you spend more time standing around in front of the Keurig making coffee.

      Keurig provides a clean single-cup solution

      If by "clean" you mean dripping all over the place, and filling up the trash can with plastic, then sure I guess they're "clean".

      I guess we could all switch to a press ...

      If you're looking for that sort of coffee then yes, you would need to use a press. But most people aren't looking for espresso or other specialty types of coffee, they just want a fat mug of brewed coffee. But since you brought it up, a Keurig really is just a specialty-made press which wears out faster and costs a lot more. And FYI, presses don't require a stand-alone heating method at all, unless you get a really cheap-o version.

      (I've not the space to keep a proper tea kettle on my office desk)

      But you have space for a freaking huge Keurig? LOl ok then.

    180. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the cost of your time.

      Man, sleeping is costing me a fortune. An alarm clock must be easily worth it's weight in gold. Because, any minute you're not working you're losing money.

    181. Re:Why? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You found a study that supports your opinion, good for you.

      I spent 10 minutes reading the study, they admit they don't even see an increase in attention from caffeine in 'non-addicts'. My supposition is that the measure of 'attention' they used was selected to produce the result they want.

      The alternative is to assume; we're all addicted to a drug that does nothing.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    182. Re:Why? by glavenoid · · Score: 1

      Either the coffee solution requires EXTENSIVE testing, or it requires minimal muss/fuss.

      Who said anything about requirements?

      These things seem mutually exclusive,

      This is where "to seem" bears its ugly teeth when one extrapolates based on a faulty and incorrect assumption.

      --
      I, for one, am looking forward to the inevitable /. beta rollout fallout.
    183. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when is Apple going to make a coffee machine?

    184. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... Keurig sucks. I've had their coffee, it's expensive and tastes bland.

      Well, Keurig doesn't even make coffee, so I'm not sure what you were drinking.

      Their parent company, Green Mountain Coffee, makes the pods, and puts a lot of different coffees in them..... their own, Starbucks, Paul Newman's, Emeril's, Gloria Jean's, Tully's, Wolfgang Puck's, and several more. There are also the compatible pods not produced by Green Mountain (i.e. the reason they're headed towards DRM), such as those by Melitta and Peet's. Do you really think that all of those are bland?

      Coffees like the seasonally-available Anniversary Blend, by Starbucks, are anything but bland. It's popular enough around here that all of the local stores sell out within a day of receiving it; so even if you don't like it, there seem to be more than enough people who do.

    185. Re:Why? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Pussy. You just need to add a little Irish Whiskey to take the edge off. Then a little whipped cream to keep up the blood sugar.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    186. Re:Why? by dlingman · · Score: 1

      Nope. You need to train your minions to run the grinder FOR you.

      I get up. "Brrraaaaiiinnns". "Quick - start getting coffee ready - zombie daddy is coming..."

      When a bit older, I'll see if they can be trusted to use the aeropress...

    187. Re:Why? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Delicious cafestol.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    188. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12oz setting and freshly ground coffee.
      I love that I get my morning travel mug in about a minute.

    189. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, get a re-usable K cup shell and buy ground up coffee from the store. :)

    190. Re:Why? by hawk · · Score: 1

      >Your forgetting the grinding of the fresh beans to put in that press.

      *Shrug.*

      And you forgot the part about roasting the coffee.

      Although recently I've been lazy, and bought it both ground *and* roasted . . .

    191. Re:Why? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You buy tea by the gallon?

      You have spender syndrome. They sell tea leaves/bags for a surprisingly low price.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    192. Re:Why? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't drink coffee that much so I'll stick with the ground coffee

      when you think about it, that does not make sense. in fact, folks who drink a lot of coffee (often) would benefit from pre-ground since it won't sit around too long.

      you don't drink a lot and so keeping it in bean form until you need it makes MORE sense for you.

      its said that 15mins to 30mins after the grind, its now sawdust (more or less). you have to have it right after the grind. exposed to air and it loses freshness fast, and that goes for 'vacuum packed' ones, too.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    193. Re:Why? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      A press takes timing. If you let it sit too long in goes bitter. I like a little bitter, so I go 2.5 minutes. Of course if you start with burnt beans it's instant bitter.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    194. Re: Why? by lecoupdejarnac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not only is it less green, but it seems most people don't think about the fact that these machines inject hot water through cheap disposable plastic cups. Lots of coffee machines have plastic parts that the hot water passes through, leaching endocrine-disrupting phthalates as it heats the plastic, right into your coffee cup. I'll stick with my metal water kettle and glass French press.

    195. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you shop? Costco has them around $0.35 per pod. Even The super premium brands are under $1 per cup.

      And if you just go to a shop which sells coffee beans you can get those same brands for a lot cheaper in bulk, and brands which taste a hell of a lot better still for a lot cheaper.

      My wife and I tried out a Keurig at home, we almost immediately figured out we were easily paying ten times as much for the grounds so we tried the re-usable cup instead. Thing is a messy pain in the ass. We used it for about 6 months and then just ditched it and went back to a regular drip-style coffee machine.
      I suppose if you only drank one or two cups a DAY then it might be a benefit, but the whole point of the Marketing is that it's "less wasteful", and if you're concerned about cost then tossing a little bit out of a regular pot is still much, much cheaper. The only other Appeal it has is that it's easy to just toss in a K-Cup and hit "go", but that's only a bonus if you don't care about the increase in price or the fact that even the "premium" brands which make "K-Cups" taste like Monkey Ass.

    196. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm... IKEA is expensive on many things in my opinion. Good Will can occasionally have good deals. I would hate to see these boutiques that you mention.

    197. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So then you say Keurig is awesome! Because back in the day Beta was way better than VHS. It was not as popular, but the picture was superior! I will assume that the VHS/Beta wars predates your existence on this realm know as Earth.

    198. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that I don't go to DD or Starschmucks to buy coffee, if anything I take my reusable 7-11 roadie mug into 7-11 and I think it's $1 for the refill (which is I believe 16oz, more like 2 cups of coffee). My used Mr Coffee machine that I bought at a yard sale for $2 to replace the exact same model I bought for $1 at a yard sale 14 years earlier has a re-usable filter basket I just have to dump and rinse in the kitchen sink, and a 1lb bag of coffee (that I can grind at the store for free if I want, rather than at home) produces (guessing) 100+ cups of coffee for say $9/lb.

      So, DD = 100cups for $1.49ea = $149. Keurig = $120 for the machine (one time cost) + $.65/cup or $65 for 100 cups. My Mr Coffee = $2 for the machine (I bought a couple "spares" on ebay for like $10ea I keep in storage), and $9 for 100 cups, plus with the reusable filter basket total waste for mine is one bag (waxed paper) vs. 100 plastic cups for the Keurig, and who knows what for the DD unless you bring your own roadie mug to refill...

      So... mine, $9/100 cups and very little waste - Keurig $65/100cups and 100 little plastic/foil cups of waste - and DD $149/100cups and unknown waste (little if you bring your own cup)... I think my method wins, lowest cost, lowest waste, probably "greenest" overall.

    199. Re:Why? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Costco and other sell knockoff compatible pods for far less

      But wasn't the point of the article that you could no longer use knockoffs with Keurig?

    200. Re:Why? by rossz · · Score: 1

      I pay $35/lbs for my coffee beans. It's Jamaican Blue Mountain.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    201. Re:Why? by rossz · · Score: 1

      My espresso maker can make 1 oz up to 8 oz at a press of a button (Jura Capresso). I love that machine.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    202. Re:Why? by drkim · · Score: 1

      Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

      I guess we could all switch to a press ... but that's a bit messy and requires a stand alone heating method (I've not the space to keep a proper tea kettle on my office desk)

      Keurig provides a clean single-cup solution

      Unfortunately these pods wind up making your coffee cost $51 bucks a pound, as opposed to bags of coffee @ 6-7 bucks a pound.

      For example, the Nespresso Arpeggio costs $5.70 for 10 espresso capsules, while the Folgers Black Silk blend for a K-Cup brewed-coffee machine is $10.69 for 12 pods. But that Nespresso capsule contains 5 grams of coffee, so it costs about $51 a pound. And the Folgers, with 8 grams per capsule, works out to more than $50 a pound.

      http://www.thekitchn.com/51-pe...

      The good news is that you can make one cup of good drip coffee with a single cup coffee filter that rests on the cup and uses regular ground coffee. They can be had for less than six bucks:
      http://quetico.org/index.cfm?f...
      http://ezway.en.ec21.com/EZ_Wa...
      http://teeccino.com/product/81...
      http://fantes.com/coffee-manua...

    203. Re:Why? by drkim · · Score: 1

      Then you get to clean up both your grinder...

      So you're comparing using the pre-ground coffee in the pod with grinding the beans each time you make a cup?

      Couldn't I just skip the grinder, buy pre-ground coffee, and have the same quality as the pod coffee??

      (...and save $44 bucks a pound!)

    204. Re:Why? by drkim · · Score: 1

      Doesn't that require a separate filter for each cup?...

      No.
      You can get a permanent gold reusable filter for it for $5 (They make these for almost every other size of coffee makers, too.)

      http://www.amazon.com/Gold-Ton...

    205. Re:Why? by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      Keurig provides a clean single-cup solution

      too bad any coffee I've tasted from a Keurig tastes like crap.

      I'll stick to using a french press. Microwaves are everywhere and they make hot water with little effort.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    206. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Keurig provides a clean single-cup solution"

      But not very environmentally friendly. Do we really need to make that much more plastic crap that will just get thrown away? Even if recycled - why?

    207. Re:Why? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Use the m-wave.

      Immersion heaters are not safe.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    208. Re:Why? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      The problem must be with your parser. Maybe you should get that checked.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    209. Re:Why? by paazin · · Score: 1

      The "Green Mountain" in their company names refers to the piles of green dollars that they are making with this crap.

      Or it could be a reference to the Green Mountains of Vermont near to where they were founded.

      So much hate for really rather an insignificant and mundane product...

    210. Re:Why? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      You forgot our almost fanatical devotion to the Pope.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    211. Re:Why? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      They make one-cup presses, you know. And you don't have to use the same beans in every cup--you're allowed to buy more than one variety at a time, even.

      At least, that's still true here in Sweden. Maybe your country's not as free.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    212. Re:Why? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      That's about twice what I pay for Lavazza espresso beans at my local grocery.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    213. Re:Why? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      It's like when you find the exact same piece of generic furniture sold at (but not designed by) IKEA in some upstreet furniture shop - IKEA would call it "ROBUST" (or whatever) and sell it for $89, while the other "boutique" will call it "Multimedia bench in Nordic pinewood" at thrice the pricetag.

      Well, actually, IKEA would name it after some obscure village in Denmark, but otherwise you're spot on.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    214. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP Said it didn't parse. GP pointed out that it did. End of story. Meaning is not the issue. If he wanted to say it didn't make sense he shouldn't have instead said it didn't parse.

    215. Re:Why? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      teabags don't compost -

      Yes, they do, if you use the right composting method, a worm composting bin.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    216. Re:Why? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Pressing a button is all my brother could do. I ran an experiment over a couple of months, leaving the coffeemaker in a state closer and closer to being ready to make coffee. The ONLY time he would make coffee would be if all he had to do was push the button to start the process. And he wanted coffee every morning.

      After the experiment, I cut him off. Oh, how he whined about how he didn't know he was supposed to actually do something. Nobody told him.

      And he was only 40 years old.

      Of course, he can't afford the Keurig system, because he's a general contractor [well, for wood construction] who refuses to have a cell phone [yes, he only discusses work via email with either potential clients or actual clients of which he has very few], and has to take the bus to job sites because he's lost his license and several vehicles for driving without registration/insurance.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    217. Re:Why? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Keurig also tastes like shit and is overpriced.

    218. Re:Why? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      One word: Aeropress.

      Actually two words, Zojirushi + Aeropress (specifically a VE-series Zojirushi). Beats a Keurig any day, and not DRM-able in any manner.

      (If I'm being traditional and have the time I'll use a machinetta).

    219. Re:Why? by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      He haven't had his coffee yet.

    220. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just work hard to make more money so it's affordable yet convenient.

      I never understand people who work harder to save what amounts to almost no money. Unless of course you multiply savings by X years and show me some number in the thousands......

      Then I'll again just laugh because I'll be lazy the entire time over all those years..... then work hard one day and make enough to buy another 10 years worth of over-priced coffee.

    221. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah or I could just make a six figures and not be in the mood to d*ck with filters and all that jazz.....

      By the time you've been miserable doing extra work over the years, the extra cash to me was worth it.

      Living like a broke dick over less than $100 a month is just amazing to me.

    222. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything that heats water can be designed as safely as the Keureg is. The question is how safe the containment systems are.

    223. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This....

      I just bought a $600 Expresso machine with a nice steamer and integrated grinder/hopper. Best money I've spent!

      The taste of a properly extracted expresso with that perfect oily Crema is just amazing.

      My K-cup brewer sits next to it mostly idle now, even though making expresso is far more work.

    224. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keurig machines can be programmed to warm up the water in the morning; otherwise it takes about 4 minutes.
      The brewing cycle takes about 45 seconds.
      There's not a way to automatically brew one cup at a certain time each morning.
      But you can have everything ready so you get a cup of hot coffee in a minute.

    225. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fail

    226. Re: Why? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      The Keurig was free at my last job. So were the snacks.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    227. Re:Why? by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 1

      regular brewed coffee costs less than ten cents a cup. even if you make half a pot and only drink one cup, it's still cheaper than k-cups.

    228. Re:Why? by ruir · · Score: 1

      You dont go to a coffee shop outside only for the coffee, but for the environment, and for a walk. Some even go there for the wifi.

    229. Re:Why? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      A press takes timing.

      I guess if you leave it for ages, though the grounds tend to settle quite fast into a compact blob. I never found leaving it made much difference. The main thing is to push down a bit, then pull up a bit if it's too hard to push, let the grounds sink and then push all the way.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    230. Re:Why? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      It's literally instant coffee.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    231. Re:Why? by redalien · · Score: 1

      Well, of course, that's the point. This would prevent the knockoffs working.

    232. Re:Why? by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      " The paper filters, the article suggested, removed the coffee oils, which contain cafestol."

      from:

      How Coffee Raises Cholesterol

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    233. Re:Why? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      No, what they do is they take an $89 piece of furniture, market it at $250 for 3-4 months, then 'slash' the price to $150 and watch the fools come and pick up a 'bargain'

    234. Re:Why? by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      I don't really care about antioxidants, one way or the other, but Your signature made me laugh out loud, so I just wanted to say thanks for that.

      I think the bacon and cheese explain his need for antioxidants!

    235. Re:Why? by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      regular brewed coffee costs less than ten cents a cup. even if you make half a pot and only drink one cup, it's still cheaper than k-cups.

      Certainly. In terms of cost/cup:

      Regular coffee at home Keurig Dunkin Starbucks.

    236. Re:Why? by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 2

      There is a variation on the aeropress made by some other company that can use K-cups.

    237. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the "logic" that sells these fu(kin& contraptions.

      Keurig coffee goes for about $30 a pound. Supermarkets around here have to give a comparable price per pound on the shelf. I almost laughed when I finally realized a few years ago why GMCR stock was going through the roof.

      $30 a pound! That's more than twice what VERY good fresh roasted coffee goes for at a premium, retail mark up. I get my beans for about $7 a pound.

      Bonus! the machine is $120 dollars! Buy the razor, get locked into the blade.

      YGBFKM

    238. Re:Why? by queBurro · · Score: 1

      neither are microwaves - http://www.snopes.com/science/...

      --
      sag
    239. Re:Why? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I am on my second coffee grinder because the first one clogged up and died. I have no idea how that happened because I am now on the warranty replacement and I "never" clean it. I use it daily and I may clean it again if it seems to be laboring. Had it for a couple years like that now. Cuisinart. On sale on newegg, at the time.

      It does make a bit of a mess though. You can't make coffee without a sink to pour it from the hopper into whatever. The coffee is hilariously electrostatically attracted to the container. So there are reasons why some prissy wanker in a sterile environment would have problems with actual coffee, and would want someone else to wrap it up in paper for them.

      Work environments without a kitchen are bullshit. If you have a kitchen, however, you can deal with coffee.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    240. Re:Why? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Use a reusable pod and fill it with the coffee of your choice.

      I do that. It's called an espresso machine. The reusable pod is made from stainless steel You also use a fine grind for espresso. And the result kicks the living shit out of Keurig. If you're going to do all that shit anyway, you'd be an idiot to use a Keurig when you can get an espresso machine for less and make better coffee.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    241. Re:Why? by TractorBarry · · Score: 1

      > Immersion heaters are not safe.

      I do hope this comment was meant to be funny. Or maybe your planet has nuclear powered immersion heaters with armed guards and death rays ?

      --
      Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    242. Re:Why? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I still haven't tried roasting coffee in an air popper, but apparently that's the way to do it. The green beans will keep for years, and can often be sourced very inexpensively on eBay direct from the growers.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    243. Re:Why? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's not what I see at the local Dunkin Donuts (multiple locations). Most customers come in there, buy a cup, maybe some donuts, and leave as fast as they can.

    244. Re:Why? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      spresso is a remarkably unrelaible way of making a good beveradge. When it works and you get everything right, it's great, bu tit's really easy to get wrong.
      A press on the other hand is amazingly reliable.

      You are in fact certifiably insane. This is a load of dingo's kidneys. It's the espresso that is remarkably reliable because steam is always at the same temperature. Sure, you can deliver a different amount of heat energy by delivering a different amount of steam. The press not only suffers from a variable temperature curve but as the sibling comment says, it also adds a time variable which is not really present in espresso.

      You can still get a pleasant cup out of long-ago ground beans.

      Yes, but that would be stupid, because a burr grinder is not so very expensive. There's no need to pay more than about fifty bucks for one at the outside, if you lurk sales. And why wouldn't you? The fact is that just roasting the coffee ahead of time compromises the flavor. Buying it ground is madness. If you actually liked coffee, you wouldn't do that. Just take a fucking no-doz.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    245. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

      I don't get this. I run the cheapest coffee maker in the world. I even searched until I found one with nothing but an ON/OFF switch. If I want 2 cups of coffee, I only fill the tank to the 2 cup mark and put in less coffee grounds. If I want 12 cups of coffee, I fill the tank all the way up and load more coffee griounds. What the hell am I missing here?

    246. Re:Why? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Everyone needs a hobby :) That's a very cool idea, but the last thing my kitchen needs is another machine. And I have to face the fact that I'm never going to make the time to roast coffee beans - just like I'm not going to brew beer or follow that pot roast recipe that takes me several hours to prepare. All would undoubtedly result in a better product, but you need to have an interest in it (or be exceedingly picky).

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    247. Re:Why? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Everyone needs a hobby :) That's a very cool idea, but the last thing my kitchen needs is another machine. And I have to face the fact that I'm never going to make the time to roast coffee beans - just like I'm not going to brew beer or follow that pot roast recipe that takes me several hours to prepare.

      If you can get a local roaster to supply you with a handful of green beans, you should take them home and put them in a (non-teflon duh) pan over a medium heat and stir them around with a wooden tool in order to see just how tragically easy roasting beans is. Now, imagine them dancing around in a popcorn air popper, and you only having to watch them change color.

      Honestly, I don't do it either :D Mostly because my air popper got moused up so I threw it away. But it's easy as hell to do in a pan. It's several minutes, not several hours.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    248. Re:Why? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      It's not easier?

      Place cup, insert cartridge, push button.

      It can't get much easier than that.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    249. Re:Why? by umghhh · · Score: 1
      I do not suppose the actual reasons for disallowing electrical appliances in the office is of technical nature. I think that is just bureaucracy, or an insurance one most likely. It may even be that there used to be good reasons(*) not to allow employees to touch anything electrical other than keyboard and the mouse.

      * - if you are wondering what that heck that is, I can help, as I tried that once myself (out of curiosity). The two metal things are old type razor blades connected directly with the power supply and separated with matches or some other isolator. You put it into water and it boils in few seconds. The dangers are: you can electrocute yourself or brake the fuse but if it worked then you had an advantage of not very well tasting tee or coffee.

    250. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We boil water in an electric kettle in 2.5 minutes, then pour into a press, and blammo, coffee. Keurig provides stupid, bland, watery goop that doesn't leave you with a bunch of grinds to clean up. However, it is neither greener, nor more efficient or even easier really.

      Your method takes 2 minutes longer to get coffee than a Keurig. Not so bad but... Where did you cover the part where you dump the grinds and clean up your press? One of the HUGE benefits to a Keurig, especially in an office, is that you don't need a kitchen to deal with the cleanup. The water reservoir makes it a great thing if you don't have a kitchen or a nearby water source.

      That said, we ditched our Tasimo because the Keurig allowed for off-brand cups (even the refillable cups). Having off-brand let us select from a wide variety of coffee/tea/etc that just wasn't available on the Tasimo. If Keurig goes this route, I'm not buying in.

    251. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your forgetting the grinding of the fresh beans to put in that press. Otherwise, your gratuitous snootiness is entirely pointless.

      Firstly: "you're", not "your".

      *Sigh* - if you insist...

      Otherwise, you're gratuitous snootiness is entirely pointless.

    252. Re:Why? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      One word: iagreewithyourpostandlovemyaeropressbutthinkthat'sactuallytwowordssmooshedtogether.

    253. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beyond "insert coffee pod, push button, drink" what "features" could possibly be interesting enough to spend money on? The whole thing with the Keurig is decent coffee instantly. Not great coffee. Not stupendously good coffee, but decent and quick.

    254. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scaling a drip maker to one 'cup' doesn't work in reality, IME you need about 4 'cups' in a full size (12-'cup') maker (of course these are not real cups, usually 5 or 6 oz). And drip brewing is relatively linear as well. Heating the element is a constant time operation but it doesn't take all that long.

    255. Re:Why? by ichthyoboy · · Score: 2

      That, or they're from Vermont...but probably a little of both

    256. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to post the exact same thing when I read the post about messy presses.
      The Aeropress is great example of engineering design for a purpose.

    257. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's got electrolytes

    258. Re:Why? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Actually, I (ok my wife, but she doesn't read /. so I take the credit), grind fresh beans, and then use the keurig with an aftermarket refillable pod to brew the coffee.

      I was against the Keurig at first myself for the same reason. The pods are expensive. I could see keeping around some as a novelty when I want a quick something different, but I drink coffee every day damnit. Its ridiculously wasteful to be tossing plastic bits with every cup of joe.

      It came to the house at X-Mass time and for a while we used it only as a backup when we ran out of beans. Then we found the refillable cups, and the old coffee maker got set aside as the new backup.

      Looks like Keurig doesn't like us very much of course, but they can suck it, I will go back to a mocha pot before I buy a coffee maker that tries to tell me what I can and can't use with it.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    259. Re:Why? by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      I wondered that, too. I think they're actually trying to eliminate the off-brand K-cup market, though, which is pretty big. It seems that few people that have a Keurig actually use the My K Cup accessory, so that's a tiny market to try to eliminate.

      Unfortunately, even with that accessory, the coffee sucks.

    260. Re:Why? by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      Starbuck's Via is also a clean single-cup solution. It is cheaper, smaller and more dependable than the Keurig machine. It is also a format that would be very hard to add DRM, etc. Since Keurig wants to punish its customers, I will forgo their stupidity. Keurig, like Beta, sucks.

      The machine itself may be cheaper but the long term cost of the pods, the Starbucks is the more expensive option.

    261. Re:Why? by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      steam is always at the same temperature

      Uh, no it's not. Boiling water is always at the same temperature. (Except for the effects of altitude and pressure in a sealed vessel.) Steam, as the gaseous phase of water, can get almost arbitrarily hot.

    262. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Per cup they are more expensive.

      However, if you have someone in your household who drinks coffee and now one else does it does end up as a cost savings (I have the spreadsheets to back it up). My wife made one 4 cup pot every day. Usually would drink 1-2 cups out of it and dump the rest. Because by the time she got to it it was gross. Sometimes even making a second pot for fresh coffee. We went thru a bag of coffee about every 2 weeks at 5-10 dollars a bag depending on brand and quality.

      I bought her the self grinder and 1 shot. As well as buying her whatever flavor of cups she wanted. I bought a box of the things about last November. As well as a bag at the beginning of feb.

      My per cup cost is up. Total cost is *WAY* down. As she is not on average throwing out 3 cups.

      Now that I have the machine I should have bought 1 model down. There are 3 settings for size. The middle and large are useless as they make watered down coffee. That would be ok if you like that sort of thing... However, since I was buying cold I had no idea.

      However, putting DRM into the cups will only drive people to the alternatives. The damn things are already expensive. People are not looking to add more in... People want convenience and most importantly cheap.

    263. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If grinding and brewing is too tough get a super automatic espresso machine. Better long term purchase than a Keurig. Unground beans and water in and espresso out at the push of a button.

      http://www.amazon.com/DeLonghi...

      Sure it is 700-800 bucks but if you like coffee it is AWESOME (my wife and I drink a lot of coffee). The only problem is all other coffee tastes like old dishwater after you have one of these.

      Or get a much cheaper Nespresso and spend the hundreds of dollars you saved on great (machine) espresso.

    264. Re:Why? by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      You should really try the AeroPress. I used to be a diehard french press guy, but I am not looking back.

      It's the same thing, just a different form factor. You're forcing water through the grounds after steeping a bit and using either a metal mesh or paper filter.

    265. Re:Why? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's a fire hazard. It draws at least 1300 watts. That's the fire hazard.

      You should probably understand what things mean before talking about them.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    266. Re:Why? by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

      6-12 cups of Joe.

      Just enough to get me started in the morning..

    267. Re:Why? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Blah blah blah, make it yourself, blah blah blah.
      We can make any food item ourselves, but why? This is easier, quieter. It's about personal trade off.
      Me, I never prepare my own coffee.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    268. Re:Why? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      Is it really so hard to just grind the beans and brew it yourself? I do this every morning.

      Maybe because I like my coffee extra strong, and my wife likes a more mild coffee experience.

      My wife got me an espresso machine several years ago for Christmas. I loved it. I used to buy the whole beans and grind them myself, and make my own espresso, but it -WAS- messy and time consuming. She couldn't do the straight-up espresso, so I had to steam milk for her too. More mess to clean up, and it needs to be done right away. The Keurig allows both of us to have coffee made exactly the way we want it, with minimum mess, all for a decent price.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    269. Re:Why? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      You are in fact certifiably insane.

      I have had many crap cups of espresso coffee. I guess according to you, using observational skills is an indication of insanity.

      This is a load of dingo's kidneys. It's the espresso that is remarkably reliable because steam is always at the same temperature.

      Uh... no. Steam can be arbitrarily hot. Espresso also requires slightly sub-boiling water. You also have to push it through the beans at the right speed, which requires careful regulation of the pressure of the *water* and the bean grind.

      The press not only suffers from a variable temperature curve but as the sibling comment says, it also adds a time variable which is not really present in espresso.

      So? Most of the brewing is done in the first minute. And besides, as I stated, it's a very forgiving technique and will still brew a pleasant cup for even a lot of variation in the parameters.

      Yes, but that would be stupid, because a burr grinder is not so very expensive.

      Except you need to acquire one, find room to keep it, take time to use it (and they're quite noisy, so not ideal for an office) and suffer from the relative lack of range of unground beans compared to pre-ground ones. Very stupid.

      And why wouldn't you?

      Because I don't give enough of a fuck, and the results with pre-ground beans are sufficient for my purposes. Sometimes I'm so lazy I even by my coffee from starbucks. Suck it.

      The fact is that just roasting the coffee ahead of time compromises the flavor. Buying it ground is madness. If you actually liked coffee, you wouldn't do that. Just take a fucking no-doz.

      Spoken like a true espresso-nazi who failed to read my post. Using pre-ground coffee is not ideal but it's fine for making a pleasant beveradge.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    270. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you on crack? You pour boiling hot water into a cup and you magically get coffee??? Do you grind? Use junk from a jar? Bet it tastes like crap. Wait, I can't even have an electric kettle at work...

    271. Re:Why? by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      isnt oxygen carcinogenic?

    272. Re:Why? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 4, Funny

      The way to avoid getting busted for having a coffee maker in your office is to put the coffee maker in an old computer case and run the plug out the back. One of my foreign coworkers has this setup in the server room he works in and in the 6 years I have known him no one in management or facilities maintenance has found it and no one else in the office will turn him in as they have started doing the same thing.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    273. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hot water? Pretty sure that's a fire hazard.

    274. Re:Why? by ttucker · · Score: 1

      You are right, they are mostly the same, which is part of what makes the AeroPress so great. One major difference is that the filter is located on the bottom of the AeroPress. Since the coffee grounds mostly float, it is much easier to press, and results in much less sludge. Also, with the AeroPress, you are able to stop the steeping immediately, which yields much better coffee. Finally, with the paper filter, the AeroPress is able to handle a much finer grind of coffee, which makes it more efficient and allows for almost espresso strength brew.

      Remember that in the existential sense, all coffee is just ground beans with hot water... it is the subtle variations that matter.

    275. Re:Why? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      We have copiers that draw that much. Why are they not "fire hazards" ? I've seen Projectors that draw that much as well, again, not a fire hazard. I've had to have custom wired surge protectors because the fire marshal says you can't use an extension cable between the wall and the surge protector. It caused an actual fire, because it was wired wrong, by an electrician. I've never seen an extension cable cause a fire. Ever.

      There are rules in place that cause the very problem they are trying to solve. So, I do have experience in my corner.

      The point is, you can have absolute rules or you can use judgement. Each has its own risks. But if you do EVERYTHING by the book, you're probably doing something wrong.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    276. Re:Why? by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      You can get a washable filter for it: http://www.amazon.com/Gold-Ton...
      Heat your water in the microwave.

    277. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would the electric kettle be more of a fire hazard than the Keurig? They both heat water to or near boiling, no?

    278. Re:Why? by multisync · · Score: 1

      Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

      I guess we could all switch to a press ... but that's a bit messy and requires a stand alone heating method (I've not the space to keep a proper tea kettle on my office desk)

      I've been using single cup coffee makers like this Black & Decker Brew 'n Go for years. No mess, no fuss, just pour a cup full of fresh water from your cup in to the reservoir, add a couple scoops of fresh ground coffee to the filter basket and hit the go button.

      You get a fresh cup of coffee without the waste of those empty "pods," and no DRM to boot.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    279. Re:Why? by Gryle · · Score: 1

      ....why would you want to brew decaf? Heretic!

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    280. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you have room for a coffee maker but not a kettle? Couldn't you just replace one with the other?

    281. Re:Why? by Gryle · · Score: 1

      Honestly, if I had the space available, I would.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    282. Re:Why? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

      I guess we could all switch to a press ... but that's a bit messy and requires a stand alone heating method (I've not the space to keep a proper tea kettle on my office desk)

      Keurig provides a clean single-cup solution

      You can put in less coffee and water, you know. I have a small coffee maker (4 cups) and just grind the beans and brew. It tastes better than Keurig, and is less wasteful. And it's so low-tech that some company can't maximize their profits by preventing me from minimizing my costs.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    283. Re:Why? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      However, it is neither greener, nor more efficient or even easier really.

      The "Green Mountain" in their company names refers to the piles of green dollars that they are making with this crap.

      Even that I don't understand. I have literally never had a cup of Green Mountain coffee that was worth the heat it took to brew it.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    284. Re:Why? by Lord+Lemur · · Score: 1

      Now imagine a Beowolf Cluster of Keurigs. That is the slashdot solution.

    285. Re:Why? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      There is always the option to give up on substance abuse.

      If you think a cup of coffee in the morning is substance abuse, I'd hate to hear what you think of a glass of wine with dinner.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    286. Re:Why? by Lord+Lemur · · Score: 1

      Extensive testing not required, just prefered.

    287. Re:Why? by executioner · · Score: 1

      I think the hate is for the unnecessary and repugnant DRM they are going to force on their consumers in the next incarnation of the product. Personally the DRM guarantees I will not be upgrading, I like my Dunkin Donuts coffee and i'm sure they will be considered a knock off as there are limited places to purchase them. They must be feeling the pain of the K-cups being made by everyone. Although I'm not sure as a company that implementing DRM is the best way for them to go, I see lots of customer complaints happening after release.. (what do you mean I can only use green mountain coffee brands?) then they will go and my the mister coffee k-cup machine that doesn't have DRM in it.

      --
      "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    288. Re:Why? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

      Just throw out the rest. You'll probably still save money.

    289. Re:Why? by beltsbear · · Score: 1

      Or buy a machine like the capresso coffeeteam that grinds and brews in one. I need to refill the beans every few days. I need to clean the filter before starting which takes seconds.

      So you pay $200 for the machine but you make it up quite fast if you would have had to use two k-cups each morning.

      Priceless: The much better coffee.

    290. Re:Why? by blandcramration · · Score: 1

      We have drip pot coffee (ugh), a Keurig, a stove, and an electric tea kettle here so I really have no excuse. I was just thinking about bringing in a press the other day, but I feel as if some people would take my grinds out of the freezer. I don't want to share.

    291. Re:Why? by richieb · · Score: 1

      Really? Try this: pour over coffee. Cheap and no mess... ...richie

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    292. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes it is. I waste way too much when I do that. With the k-cups a pound lasts over a month. So using the same technology as printers only makes it more difficult.. I will keep my Keurig 1.0

    293. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B33rNinj4 is right. I got some Peet's pods for our office Keurig, and the coffee came out really horrible. So now I use a one-cup cone with a paper filter, and an electric kettle. What did I do with those pods? I cut them open and poured the coffee out into the filter. The coffee was fine! Not as good as when I grind it myself, but not bad.

      Like MP3s, you get something more convenient at a lower quality. This is supposed to be "disruptive". Unlike MP3s, Keurig is not that much more convenient, and the quality is much, much lower. So, forget it!

    294. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ikea makes particle board items that fall apart with even moderate use. They have generic design and appeal to the masses who think they are buying a "designer" product when in fact, are buying pure crap

      Comparing that to "real" furniture is absurd. Just because you do not value quality furniture does doesn't mean I have "spender syndrome" if I do.

    295. Re:Why? by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Get the reusable filter, and fill it with your own grind. Sometimes I make half-caf, chocolate, tea, or make a second cup with the used grinds and put in a little instant for the caffeine.

      I got a little keurig from my dad, who said the packaged k-cups were too strong (I made 2 cups from each!). When this one fries I'll go back to my Mr. Coffee. the machine is terribly complicated; I took one apart and never did figure out what was wrong with it. Mine will occasionally refuse to brew, requiring a cold reboot (not sure what OS it uses).

    296. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This so much, having a keurig is okay when I'm not actually doing something, but when I am busy, the process of making coffee with a one adds a lot of overhead and context-switching penalties. Which is why I don't have one anymore.

    297. Re:Why? by wallsg · · Score: 1

      Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

      I guess we could all switch to a press ... but that's a bit messy and requires a stand alone heating method (I've not the space to keep a proper tea kettle on my office desk)

      Keurig provides a clean single-cup solution

      One man's downside is another's clear advantage.

      I am totally uninterested in a single-cup solution as it is a huge negative to wait for the cup to brew when I can just pour another one from my pot-plus thermos. I get my good coffee for a far lower price per cup and it stays nice and warm all day long, or at least until it's drained around 3pm.

    298. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aeropress. AMEN. Keurig and Nespresso users are just cattle. They buy their wine in jugs, too.

    299. Re:Why? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, and this is the only way I would use it, as I select and grind my own beans. But as I said earlier, how does a reusable filter make sense in a future unit where DRM locks you into only using the company's pods? Why would they allow a reusable filter in that arrangement?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    300. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, filter out all the fat soluble good stuff like Flavanoids and Polyphenols.

    301. Re:Why? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      You mean Keurig provides one of many solutions to have a clean single-cup solution using pods.

    302. Re:Why? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I'm a good programmer, I think anyway, and I don't drink any coffee. I'm only reading these comments because of trying to figure out the the foreign and exotic coffee culture that surrounds me.

    303. Re:Why? by yakovlev · · Score: 1

      Coffee makers make a little or as much coffee as you want. If you want one cup, only put one cup or water and a proportionate amount of grounds. And you have the added benefit that while brewing many cups of Keurig is a linearly hard problem (meaning that it takes 20 times longer to brew 20 cups), conventional brewing is not. When you actually in a situation where you are brewing a lot of coffee, the conventional method becomes more efficient per cup.

      Any computer programmer should be able to tell you which is the overall more efficient solution for the general situation.

      I can't believe you got away with this.

      Unless you have a collection of conventional coffee makers of increasing size (including industrial versions) then making coffee in a conventional coffee maker is ALSO a linear process.

      • Time to process n cups of coffee with a Keurig: n/1, which is O(n)
      • Time to process n cups of coffee with a 12-cup coffee maker: n/12, which is ALSO O(n)

      These are both linear processes, it's just that the 12-cup coffee maker is about 12 times as fast (for large values of n.)

    304. Re:Why? by Meski · · Score: 1

      Espresso (including pod) machines make a single cup. The downside for pods is that the coffee is pre-ground. (and stale) The upside is convenience. How much you want to pay for the convenience of not grinding your own coffee per shot is up to you. It certainly isn't a time issue, I can grind and 'shoot' an espresso in less than a minute, try getting close to that with a conventional drip/press/whatever brew. (yes the boiler element is running continuously under PID control)

    305. Re:Why? by Meski · · Score: 1

      Anyone who introduces water at or above[1] boiling point to coffee grounds is doing it wrong. (91-96C is preferred range)

      [1] yes, it can be introduced above boiling point, since espresso makers can use boilers. And the boiler temp can be above boiling point, since the path to the group head tends to cool the water somewhat.

    306. Re:Why? by Meski · · Score: 1

      +1 to this. But some of the manual consumer grade ones arent bad (Silvia) especially if you mod them. If you drink coffee other than short black, a pod machine is good enough.

    307. Re:Why? by imahawki · · Score: 1

      I recently got rid of my Keurig machine because it produces terribly weak coffee. I broke open a pod and there were 10g of coffee to the gram. That's barely enough to make 6 oz of coffee and the machine blindly lets you choose sizes up to at least 12 if not 16oz. Instead I bought a Baratza Vario H and a Clever Dripper. The grinder is overkill for sure. Any quality burr grinder, including the entry level Baratzas would work but for my money I get the significant advantage of grinding exactly 25g of coffee every.single.time. I use a $50 electric kettle to heat my water. It serves as the source of hot water for tea and hot cereal as well, which is nice. The coffee is from a local roaster who roasts their beans daily and the average age of what they're selling is a week. I may get into roasting my own beans at some point but probably not yet. The coffee I'm drinking now is so significantly better it is like drinking an entirely different drink. Its like orange flavored drink vs. orange juice.

    308. Re:Why? by niftymitch · · Score: 1

      Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

      I guess we could all switch to a press ... but that's a bit messy and requires a stand alone heating method (I've not the space to keep a proper tea kettle on my office desk)

      Keurig provides a clean single-cup solution

      Switch to a paper cone filter of a size you like.
      In the break room, microwave the water in a thermal safe thing if you do not have room for a kettle.
      If you risk super heating the water add a cut off wood chop stick or wood stir stick.

      Brew, then plop the cone in the trash, rinse the cone and enjoy.

      I have a largish fav coffee cup so for me a #4 cone and filter work well.
      I use beans ground almost fine enough for espresso so they clog
      the filter just enough to get the right brew time for my taste.
      Grinding beans in advance works as long as I do not grind too
      far in advance and keep the coffee in a good but inexpensive airtight
      container.

      Decades ago the filters needed a rinse in clear hot water to
      remove the paper taste... not so much anymore.

      --
      Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
    309. Re:Why? by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      My single-cup coffee maker came with a reusable filter that you just dump the grounds out of for the next use.

    310. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must be new here. Please elaborate on my need to demand aqueducts.

    311. Re:Why? by petteyg359 · · Score: 1

      This is where ratings need to go way above 5.

    312. Re:Why? by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      Except, every multi-cup coffee maker I've ever had has burned out after a few months with the way I drink multiple cups throughout the day.

    313. Re:Why? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      The incorrect assumption you are making is that the person you are talking to gets to set the rules.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    314. Re:Why? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Old versions (Dec. 2013) of their systems can take a refillable filter of a variety of types, which you can add your own grounds to. This is a feature that may not be present in the newer versions, and also isn't available for Tassimo. And the single-serve coffee brewers that only take coffee grounds don't have the option of getting a variety of coffees and other beverages in easy-to-use containers.

      I'm not saying their system is for everyone, but if you routinely don't drink more than a cup or two of whatever in a day, it makes more sense than a full pot brewer.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    315. Re:Why? by romons · · Score: 1

      Yes. Seems there is a theory concerning the apoptosis of cells, in which antioxidants disrupt the normal pathways, keeping cells alive that are better off dead. This explains the fact that smokers who take beta carotine tend to die of lung cancer more often than those who do NOT take it, which was discovered in the late 90s, I believe*. The smoking probably generates cancer cells that may or may not die, but antioxidants keeps more of them alive long enough to get a foothold.

      Throw away your vitamins. They are not helping you, probably do not contain what you think they do, and may actually be harming you. Throw them out now. Don't wait until you have finished the bottle. Food has all the vitamins you need (unless you are vegan, in which case you need to eat some eggs or drink some milk once in a while to get B12.)

      * http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19876916

      --
      Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company -- Mark Twain
    316. Re:Why? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      A lot of people also think McDonalds tastes good.

    317. Re:Why? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      This. The main success of Keurig has been in offices, not home use. You quickly get one cup at a time, different workers can each get the kind of coffee they want, and cleanup is painless. All of those things are a huge boon for the break room at work.

      I think you'd have to be pretty lazy to buy a Keurig for home use. The home version isn't as convenient because it doesn't have a plumbing connection, so you have to fill it with water for each cup. Cleaning up is easier to do at home, where you usually have a well equipped kitchen, than in a typical break room. It costs a lot more money to use unless you buy the refillable coffee pods. But some people are that lazy and willing to pay the price.

    318. Re:Why? by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      There are a hundred people working in your office, and you don't have a working kitchen?

      Please tell me where you work. I want to make a note never to apply for a job there.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    319. Re:Why? by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      One of the things that any anthropologist will tell you about drug use is that the context and ritual is part of the drug. Nicotine patches are not a substitute for cigarettes because lighting up and inhaling is part of it.

      If you like pod machines, DRM or not, more power to you, but I would consider quicker coffee to be a step backwards. I don't just want a caffeine hit, I actually like coffee.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    320. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > We have drip pot coffee (ugh)

      Why the "ugh"? Drip is a perfectly acceptable way of brewing. Perhaps you mean "percolator" (which is an atrocity, indeed).

    321. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Me, I never prepare my own coffee

      Then you, my friend are not a man, but instead a child.

    322. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh. Another retard who thinks it is impossible to properly use psychoactive drugs.

      Go away.

    323. Re:Why? by Suferick · · Score: 1

      Ground coffee goes stale in minutes. Good hand coffee grinders are available quite cheaply.

      As for the mess, try an Aeropress. Very quick and easy to clean up.

    324. Re:Why? by Optali · · Score: 1

      It is not only hard...

      It is simply BETTER, in any aspect.

      Your beans are fresh and containing all the oils that add the smell and create the foam. And the aftertaste!!! I have yet to try a pod coffee (or any other for that matter) that produces any aftertaste at all.

      For people not familiar with that: A well brewed coffee (not to hot water, ground from beans brewed in a french press) leaves a certain taste behind that lasts for hours , curiously enough this also gives a very strong sense of "satisfaction" so that this feeling of just having had a god cup of joe lasts a lot... which doesn't stop me from taking mug after mug anyway...

       

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    325. Re:Why? by Optali · · Score: 1

      Awesome! Me wantz!!!

      I have seen a similar thing but for tea in Korea.

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    326. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I used to do - variations of grinding and brewing and the associated cleanup. My inlaws bought a Keurig, and I absolutely hated the coffee that came out of it. Then we went for an extended visit, and out of politeness purchased our own coffee so as not to run their supply out, and I bought a box Green Mountain Sumatra, which was much better than I expected. I learned a valuable lesson about K-cup coffee - check the weight on the box! Flavored coffees don't actually have very much coffee. Anything over 7 oz (on an 18 pod box) is worth trying. My current favorite is Caribou Obsidian.

      Also, I didn't buy Keurig, I bought a Bunn MyCafe: http://www.amazon.com/MC-MyCafe-Single-Serve-Brewer/dp/B004EBUWHM (Amazon). It is small, extremely simple to operate, and it has "drawers" for pods, K-cups, ground coffee and plain hot water, and my opinion is that it does a superior job of brewing K-cup coffee (more pressure than Keurig, I think). I use the pod drawer to brew tea. Cleanup is rinsing the drawer after use and wiping the unit down every couple of days. It takes up 1/4 the space of the Delonghi it replaced. I will still buy and brew coffee for a special occasion, large crowd, etc... but for morning coffee and afternoon tea for just my wife and I, the K-cup system has provided a big boost to our quality of life. We even reuse the K-cups for various things, like seed-starters.

    327. Re:Why? by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      It would be something more like Gesaalt, or Ivani or Kompactor or something.

      The strangest name I've seen there is a desk lamp they used to have called "Mörker", which means "darkness" in Swedish.

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    328. Re:Why? by ynp7 · · Score: 1

      I don't believe you! That doesn't sound like a computer programmer at all.

    329. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Move your Keurig to the edge of the countertop, hold your upside-down Aeropress to the spout, and there ya go. 190F water.

    330. Re:Why? by jxander · · Score: 1

      We do. A few of them actually, with indoor plumbing and everything ... but the closest one is down the hall.

      I could go down there, fill a kettle, plug it in, wait for it to heat, pour everything into the press (or pour-over if you prefer) wait for it to steep, clean up the grounds and carry the completed

      But it's a convenience thing. I can do all that, or I can just put the pod in the machine right at my desk and press GO. Done and done. Like I said, it's not the perfect solution, but it's self contained and low maintenance. That trumps a slight increase in flavor, in my books. YMMV

      --
      This signature is false.
    331. Re:Why? by jxander · · Score: 1

      Correct. It's the solution I'm using currently, but hardly the only one. Should this DRM thing become more trouble than it's worth, and if my current machine bites the farm, I'd definitely explore other options... but for now, well...

      --
      This signature is false.
    332. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does caffeine count as crack?

      No electric kettles in the office. Fire hazard (also no space heaters, or various other personal electronics). They probably shouldn't allow coffee pots either, but YOU try to tell a hundred or so office monkeys that they can't have coffee. Good luck. I suppose I could get a nice tea cosy to disguise the kettle... but like you said, then there's the grounds to deal with. Shaking the press doesn't really get much out of it, and the fire marshal REALLY frowns on my compost pile in my office.

      Keureg is hardly a perfect solution, but it's self contained and low maintenance.

      first you complain it brews too many cups for one at up to 8 then say that "a hundred or so office monkeys" are in business for coffee so which one is it? Fwiw I grind from beans and make 1 cup a time with my machine so at home that's fine, you can get smaller pots/presses etc jeez

    333. Re:Why? by K10W · · Score: 1

      So, fun fact. I've recently come to terms with an ugly fact : I have a legitimate physical addiction to caffeine. If I go a full day without, I get headaches by the end of the day.

      Hardly the worst withdrawal symptoms ever, and defeated by some motrin and water ... but still, a bit upsetting. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to indulge my habit

      more likely the cause is caffeine is vasoconstrictior and most headaches are caused by extracranial vessels being too dilated. It is the reason caffeine is in most OTC headache medicines especially migraine formulas (which are apap/caffeine and sometimes codeine or buclizine for nausea) and similar albeit weaker action to some of the tryptans although they have other mechanisms of action on top of it.

    334. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Coffee from a vending machine

      Heresy. GTFO.

    335. Re:Why? by balbus000 · · Score: 1
    336. Re:Why? by rocket+rancher · · Score: 1

      Is it really so hard to just grind the beans and brew it yourself? I do this every morning.

      Yes, it is hard to grind the beans, because it wakes up everybody in the house. If you are living alone, it's not an issue, but when you are sharing your life with somebody (especially somebody who likes to sleep late) It's hard to ignore the convenience factor of a Keurig. My wife brought a Keurig into my life when I first met her. The coffee tastes like boiled dirt, of course, but the ease (and silence) with which you can produce a cuppa is stunning.

    337. Re:Why? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      What does horse racing have to do with it?

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    338. Re:Why? by shentino · · Score: 1

      He's using a computer programming analogy, give him his due.

    339. Re:Why? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Or you could just use a fucking keruig or whatever instead of being an even more trendy asshole than those people and save yourself all the time and waiting that you seem to be bitching about with your superior solution.

      Jesus, you people go through a lot of work to drink a drink that tastes like burnt assholes and argue over which particular burnt mix tastes better than the other.

      Its fucking coffee, NONE of it tastes 'good', you're just arguing over various definitions for burnt asshole.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  2. Horrible coffee by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Funny

    Coffee from pods is an affront dignity anyway. Get a proper espresso machine, or use a press.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    1. Re:Horrible coffee by jonwil · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unless you personally witnessed the beans being ground, its not proper coffee :)

    2. Re:Horrible coffee by sunderland56 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The regular Keurig machine makes filtered coffee; it is not an espresso machine. It makes coffee under pressure - more pressure than a drip machine, obviously, but much less than a proper espresso machine.

      Yeah, I used to be a coffee snob too. The convenience of having a fresh, hot cup of coffee within a minute of stumbling downstairs every morning is worth a lot; not having to clean the grounds out of a french press is worth a lot too. Tastes vary, but with 50 or more varieties, there's usually something worth drinking. And, hey, convenience is what sells today; otherwise people would wait to get home to make their phone calls.

    3. Re:Horrible coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it OK if I watch the person in the shop grind them?
      The last thing I want is to drink non proper coffee.

    4. Re:Horrible coffee by qazxswedc · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unless you bought the beans green and roasted them yourself, it's not proper coffee :D

    5. Re:Horrible coffee by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Unless you personally witnessed the beans being ground, its not proper coffee :)

      Very true. And grinding your own beans adds maybe 30 seconds to the process.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:Horrible coffee by Ambvai · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unless you hate the beans yourself and picked them out of the toilet before roasting them...

      Well. You might also have to be a civet.

    7. Re:Horrible coffee by hey! · · Score: 4, Funny

      It follows that blind people have never tasted proper coffee.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:Horrible coffee by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      I use a press but I have a big problem with it: they're all apparently made of thin glass. This means that, by the time the coffee is brewed, it's almost cold. Thankfully I had an old tea cosy around, but now I'm pestered by people asking why I have an ugly hat standing on my desk.

      Talk about first world problems. What I'd really like to see is a coffee pot that's made of, well... pot.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    9. Re:Horrible coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you planted, harvested, roasted, and ground the beans yourself, it's not proper coffee.

    10. Re:Horrible coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you've grown, harvested, and dried the beans, it's not proper coffee.

    11. Re:Horrible coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you bought the plantation where the coffee beans are grown, it's not proper coffee. 8==D

    12. Re:Horrible coffee by Adriax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about we just skip to the end of the chain?

      Unless you created a pocket universe, started a creation event, formed stars from the resulting big bang cloud, fused a solar system worth of hydrogen into heavier matter, collected the matter into a planet in the perfect orbit, formed a primordial soup, created life from the soup, evolved the life to create coffee bean producers, harvested the beans, processed and roasted the beans, ground them, and finally pressed them yourself, then it's not proper coffee.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    13. Re:Horrible coffee by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Coffee from pods is an affront dignity anyway. Get a proper espresso machine, or use a press.

      Besides, Dolphins and Orcas are horrible Baristas. Wait, what kind of "pods" are we talking about?

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    14. Re:Horrible coffee by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Unless you bought the beans green and roasted them yourself, it's not proper coffee :D

      Ah, just like a True Scotsman!

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    15. Re:Horrible coffee by ebh · · Score: 5, Funny

      You forgot all the steps it took to evolve the civets.

    16. Re:Horrible coffee by MondoGordo · · Score: 1

      L'dOL .... I'm not so I'lll pass on that 8o)

    17. Re:Horrible coffee by MondoGordo · · Score: 2

      uh .. .you don't need to see it to witness it ... you insensitive clod !

    18. Re:Horrible coffee by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1

      Nothing Funny about it - I agree wholeheartedly.

      I made it through the first 35 years of my life without drinking coffee. I figured if I was going to jump in, it would be for an appreciation of quality, not a dose of medical-grade caffeine from the corner drive-through.

      A good cup of Joe is an experience that deserves some time and attention. It's not a difficult skill and doesn't require high-end equipment, just good beans and a grinder. You can get a great cup unfiltered to retain all of its qualities from either a french press ($20 or less) or a simple, but quality espresso maker ($150 or less).

      These pod makers are ridiculous and now you see the inkjet marketing model in action.

    19. Re:Horrible coffee by Tough+Love · · Score: 1, Informative

      The regular Keurig machine makes filtered coffee; it is not an espresso machine.

      Yes, and it tastes horrible, compared to decently made filtered coffee. I'm quite familiar with it, unfortunately.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    20. Re:Horrible coffee by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cleaning the grounds out of a french press is awful. The aeropress completely fixes that problem.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    21. Re:Horrible coffee by Zalbik · · Score: 1

      What I'd really like to see is a coffee pot that's made of, well... pot.

      That's just silly. Hemp does a terrible job at keeping in liquids.

    22. Re:Horrible coffee by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Tip: Reheating coffee in a microwave does not spoil the flavour.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    23. Re:Horrible coffee by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2

      The demand for 'convenience' today is what is going to finally make me snap and beat someone to death with frozen fish in the meat department. But I digress. Coffee.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    24. Re:Horrible coffee by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you scrounge around Google for say, 17 seconds, and maybe use the worlds 'Insulated', 'French' and 'Press', preferably in that order, you will find, I kid you not; a veritable cornucopia of products that will satisfy your demands.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    25. Re:Horrible coffee by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Luxury.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    26. Re:Horrible coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you sure that isnt foldgers they are pouring in to your cup and saving the fresh ground beans for themselves? unless your hand is on it the whole time you would have to see it. but I digress

    27. Re:Horrible coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I found a coffee press that was a stainless steel thermos, I dont have it with me right now so I dont know the brand, but it keeps the coffee good and hot.

    28. Re:Horrible coffee by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      The convenience of having a fresh, hot cup of coffee within a minute of stumbling downstairs every morning is worth a lot; not having to clean the grounds out of a french press is worth a lot too.

      swill with water, chuck down the waste disposal unit, stick in the dishwasher and done. That's pretty convenient.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    29. Re:Horrible coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might look into double-walled presses, such as this one. I've not yet tried them out, but am tempted, for the same reason - even after only a minute or so in the press, the coffee's at immediate drinking temperature. Cue any kind of distraction.. true, it's no huge matter to pop it into the microwave for twenty seconds, but it would certainly be nice to have it somewhat hotter initially.

    30. Re:Horrible coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does god need with a coffee pot?

    31. Re:Horrible coffee by Strider- · · Score: 1

      Cleaning the grounds out of a french press is awful. The aeropress completely fixes that problem.

      Eh? take press, partly refill with water, swish around, and down the garburator (or if on a boat, over the side!). Easy peasy, takes all of 30 seconds. Might need to run the plunger under the tap for a few seconds, but again, no big deal.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    32. Re:Horrible coffee by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      unless you personally roasted the beans, it's not proper coffee.
      unless you imported the beans direct from the grower in columbia, it's not proper coffee.
      unless you personally grew the beans, it's not proper coffee.
      unless the beans were grow by small family farms, it's not proper coffee.
      unless the beans are "conflict free", it's not proper coffee.
      unless you milked the cow that provided the cream for your coffee, it's not proper coffee.
      unless you inseminated the cow that gave birth to the cow that provided the cream for your coffee, it's not proper coffee.

      and so on.

      it's all relative. don't judge people for being one step higher on the ladder than you.

    33. Re:Horrible coffee by Wrexs0ul · · Score: 1

      Unless you created the creator of the pocket universe...

      It's watchmakers all the way down, friend :)

      --
      --- Need web hosting?
    34. Re:Horrible coffee by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Could have just quoted Sagan.

      "If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe."

    35. Re:Horrible coffee by camperdave · · Score: 1

      How about we just skip to the end of the chain?

      Unless you created a pocket universe, started a creation event, formed stars from the resulting big bang cloud, fused a solar system worth of hydrogen into heavier matter, collected the matter into a planet in the perfect orbit, formed a primordial soup, created life from the soup, evolved the life to create coffee bean producers, harvested the beans, processed and roasted the beans, ground them, and finally pressed them yourself, then it's not proper coffee.

      On the other hand, they have instant coffee now-a-days. Just add a spoonful to hot water and stir.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    36. Re:Horrible coffee by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Just because they can't see doesn't mean they can't hear the grinder, smell the fresh ground aroma, and taste the result.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    37. Re:Horrible coffee by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Cleaning the grounds out of a french press is awful. The aeropress completely fixes that problem.

      Yes, it replaces the problem of cleaning the grounds out of a french press with the problem of cleaning the grounds out of an aeropress.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    38. Re:Horrible coffee by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

      You try and tell the young people of today that and they won't believe you

    39. Re:Horrible coffee by camperdave · · Score: 1

      You CAN get K-cup filter pods into which you can put whatever grind you prefer.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    40. Re:Horrible coffee by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

      I've never had that issue with French presses, but I'm usually using ~1 quart versions, so the temperature of the glass isn't a problem. I suppose it could be a problem if your press is smaller. But, you can solve that problem by warming the press first with some excess boiling water.

      I generally only make coffee on weekends. I usually make 4 cups on Saturday morning and immediately pour it into one of these: http://www.zojirushi.com/produ... It's the best thermal cafe I have ever seen. I can brew 4 cups on Saturday, drink two cups, and leave the rest for Sunday morning. 24 hours later the coffee is still hot enough for drinking.

    41. Re:Horrible coffee by sjames · · Score: 1

      L'dOL .... I'm not so I'lll pass on that 8o)

      You've got it all wrong! The civet does the passing.

      I never understood why people want to drink civet shit tea.

    42. Re:Horrible coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I used to be a coffee snob too. The convenience of having a fresh, hot cup of coffee within a minute of stumbling downstairs every morning is worth a lot; not having to clean the grounds out of a french press is worth a lot too.

      Check out the Breville YouBrew BDC600XL:

      http://gizmodo.com/5946005/
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3n8gLMrzPP8

      Built-in (burr) grinder, and a gold filter soyou can use regular whole, roasted beans. Adjustable strength, and clock/timer so it can be ready when you reach the kitchen. You can make a carafe for family-sized mornings, or press the "single cup" button for one-offs. 7" clearance for travel mugs.

      Not cheap, but given the cost of K-Cups (or any other pods), I'd hazard to guess you'll recoup the cost of the machine in about a year.

    43. Re:Horrible coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Martha Stewart mods this up.

    44. Re:Horrible coffee by drkim · · Score: 1

      Unless you bought the plantation where the coffee beans are grown, it's not proper coffee. 8==D

      So far, the really hard part has been explaining to my nosy neighbors why there are a bunch of South American guys with burros wandering around my backyard all day.

    45. Re:Horrible coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that's why God created the universe? So much trouble for the perfect coffee.

    46. Re:Horrible coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cleaning the grounds out of a french press is awful.

      30 - 45 seconds rinsing under hot water - truly awful.

    47. Re:Horrible coffee by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      Well... a True Scotsman won't fit in the grinder, so I usually settle for coffee.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    48. Re:Horrible coffee by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Dump the grounds in a strainer, let them dry a bit, then toss them in the trash. Rinse out the remainder, let it go down the drain. (I bought this place almost 4 years ago, and the kitchen pipes are still fine.) Once a week, I run the strainer and the press through the dish machine. Seems pretty easy to me.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    49. Re:Horrible coffee by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Does your grocery stock whole frozen salmon?

      In any event, please don't visit mine. :D

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    50. Re:Horrible coffee by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Besides, Dolphins and Orcas are horrible Baristas. Wait, what kind of "pods" are we talking about?

      I heard it has something to do with civets, but everyone just coughs and blushes when I ask them exactly what the connection is.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    51. Re:Horrible coffee by ruir · · Score: 1

      Would a dog qualify instead of a civet? Hmmm....coffee of dog poop...

    52. Re:Horrible coffee by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I used to be a coffee snob too. The convenience of having a fresh, hot cup of coffee within a minute of stumbling downstairs every morning is worth a lot; not having to clean the grounds out of a french press is worth a lot too.

      Yes. That's all true. Those are all reasons why I make lattes every morning.

      First I push a button on the coffee grinder. It's a cuisinart burr grinder which was about $25 on sale, and which had to be replaced once — under warranty. Then I fill up the cup on the Krups espresso machine, which I got for $5 at a yard sale, and fill its water reservoir. Put stuff where it goes and switch on. Put the $8 milk pot from the restaurant supply store down and half-fill with half and half. Then I go sit down until it makes noise, come back, and steam the milk at the proper time, which takes about a minute. Then I pour the coffee and add the milk and then let the foam slide on and in about a minute or two more work than you I've got a couple of bitchin' fresh-made lattes while you're drinking some shitty paper-flavored DRM-enabled bullshit. I even dropped the $18 on the pot to smack the grounds into. I could have bought a tamper for a few bucks, but instead I turned one out of fallen scrub oak.

      Yes, you are saving yourself about sixty seconds with your stupid Keurig with its shitty disposable pods. And now, with injury added to injury. At least it should be trivial to defeat the protection. They will do a shitty job with it. The easiest way will probably be to just use one of the pod chips wired in permanently. All you'll have to do is hack your coffeemaker. And if it fails, you won't get a warranty, and/or you'll have to hack your next one, too. If mine fails, I go drop $5 on another one. Actually, I have another $5 espresso maker on a shelf already...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    53. Re:Horrible coffee by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A good cup of Joe is an experience that deserves some time and attention. It's not a difficult skill and doesn't require high-end equipment, just good beans and a grinder.

      It requires also a wooden spoon and a pan on a stove or a hot air popper. After beans are roasted, they lose some of their character in just two days. You cannot get fresh coffee from the store.

      You can get a great cup unfiltered to retain all of its qualities from either a french press ($20 or less) or a simple, but quality espresso maker ($150 or less).

      People turn out to be lazy fucks and then get rid of their espresso machines all the time. If you can't find one at a thrift store in your city it's an unprecedented time in history.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    54. Re:Horrible coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Branding for the coffee should be: "Turtledown Coffee".

    55. Re:Horrible coffee by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      The regular Keurig machine makes filtered coffee; it is not an espresso machine. It makes coffee under pressure - more pressure than a drip machine, obviously, but much less than a proper espresso machine.

      Yeah, I used to be a coffee snob too. The convenience of having a fresh, hot cup of coffee within a minute of stumbling downstairs every morning is worth a lot; not having to clean the grounds out of a french press is worth a lot too. Tastes vary, but with 50 or more varieties, there's usually something worth drinking. And, hey, convenience is what sells today; otherwise people would wait to get home to make their phone calls.

      I don't understand the drawbacks of an expresso machine though. They rock.

      I have and old cheap one that works on pressure from boiling the water at home. It is great, and since there is no pump or anything it will never break. I do have to descale it occasionally though to get rid of the lime scale.

      At work I have once of these:

      http://www.delonghi.com/en-GB/...

      Both make lovely coffee. I can use both to froth milk if I can be bothered. But best of all I can put in them any ground coffee I choose depending on my mood. My current favourite is this stuff: http://www.taylorscoffee.co.uk...

      So what are the advantages of a pod over this solution? The delonghi machine above takes pods but I have never seen any benefit that made me want to buy more when the free ones we got with it ran out.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    56. Re:Horrible coffee by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Unless you fondle the cow yourself, it's not a real latte.

    57. Re:Horrible coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TL;DR: "If you wish to make a cup of coffee from scratch, you must first invent the universe." Apologies to Carl Sagan.

    58. Re:Horrible coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll pass? Pun intended? :)

  3. French. Press. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw pods... and especially screw DRM pods.

    Roast it yourself and french press, baby!

    1. Re:French. Press. by hey! · · Score: 2

      I have a french press, but I prefer a small moka pot -- aka a stovetop "espresso" pot. While it doesn't use enough pressure to qualify as true "espresso", with a little experimentation you can do a very nice extraction with one. They're also available in single serving and even backpack versions.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:French. Press. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I saw one in Italy with what looked like a plug for a car's cigar lighter.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  4. DRM = always bad for consumers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not want.

  5. That $30 Mr. Coffee Espresso maker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That $30 Mr. Coffee espresso maker that breaks down after two years actually makes better economic sense. I amortized the busted unit over two years (sometimes longer) and achieved $0.57/shot espresso. Keurig can suck it.

    1. Re:That $30 Mr. Coffee Espresso maker... by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that under taste-testing the Mr. Coffee performed better...

      https://www.cooksillustrated.c...

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    2. Re:That $30 Mr. Coffee Espresso maker... by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3, Informative

      By my math, you're saving just $0.01/serving over a Keurig, and you're losing a lot more time on rote actions such as measuring out beans, grinding them, packing the grounds, and cleaning the equipment. Keurig users seem like they probably got the better end of that deal.

      As for my math...
      Assumption: For the sake of argument, the $120 Keurig only lasts for two years, just like your $30 Mr. Coffee
      Assumption: Coffee drinker drinks two cups a day for two years = 1460 servings
      Assumption: An average Keurig pod costs $0.50
      Cost of pods = 1460 servings * $0.50 = $730
      Cost of machine = $120
      Amortized cost = ($730 + $120) / 1460 servings = $0.58/serving

      I tried to base most of my assumptions on numbers that favored you. For instance, though most people buying pods are likely to buy them in bulk for well under $0.50, I went with $0.50 since it was roughly in the middle of the range of prices I was seeing on Amazon. I also assumed that the Keurig would fail after just two years, despite all anecdotal evidence I'm aware of indicating that it would likely last much longer. Similarly, I went with a low rate of consumption so that the higher cost of the Keurig machine would play a greater role in the amortized cost, thus favoring your argument.

      And yet, despite all of that, the difference was surprisingly just $0.01. I didn't game the numbers to try and get that result. It really did just happen to work out that way.

      TL;DR: I'm not recommending Keurig machines, but I also wouldn't suggest that your use case represents a cost savings of any significance. In fact, I'd argue that most people would rather incur the $0.01 cost in order to be free of the hassle of dealing with everything your machine involves.

  6. And just like Sony ... by Jumperalex · · Score: 5, Informative

    they deserve to fail miserably and go down in flames.

    --
    If you can't be good, be good at it!
    1. Re:And just like Sony ... by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      And that just it - people should stop whining about 'anticompetitive' this and that. Consumers will deicde. Are they willing to put up with the reduced and/or more expensive choice of coffees? If not, word will get around pretty quickly and it will die a miserable death.

    2. Re:And just like Sony ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fine and good, but usually "Won't work with cheaper third-party replacement cartridges" isn't something that is boldly advertised on the side of the packaging. The purchaser usually finds that out much later.

      Also, whatever DRM gadget they have in there no doubt adds to the costs for the vendor-supplied stuff, all of which gets passed on to the consumer.

    3. Re:And just like Sony ... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      they deserve to fail miserably and go down in flames.

      They deserve having to drink Starbucks for the rest of their lives.

    4. Re:And just like Sony ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except what will replace them?

      WHOA, Slashdot now has timelock commenting restrictions for Anonymous cowards? Guys, the end is near. I really hope solyent news proves to be a viable slashdot replacement

      --dk
      "I'm not new school, but not old school, but somewhere inbetween" - random 6digit uid slashdot user

    5. Re:And just like Sony ... by sjames · · Score: 1

      What do you bet Keurig will NOT advertise that their coffee maker is rigged to use only Keurig cups? DRM runs counter to all expectations for a kitchen appliance.

      Letting the market decide requires a non-deceptive seller. People don't have infinite time and money to research everything these days.

  7. Really? by Spad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How much "game-changing functionality" can you really work into a fucking coffee machine?

    1. Re:Really? by alphatel · · Score: 2, Funny

      How much "game-changing functionality" can you really work into a fucking coffee machine?

      It turns into a coffee fucking machine. See how I did that?

      --
      When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    2. Re:Really? by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To be fair, i think including DRM IS game changing functionality, just in a bad way. Lets hope it fails in the market and others dont follow down that path.

      ( I dont drink mud water and even i know this is a bad precedent )

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:Really? by jd2112 · · Score: 4, Funny

      How much "game-changing functionality" can you really work into a fucking coffee machine?

      It turns into a coffee fucking machine. See how I did that?

      So that's where the cream comes from...

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    4. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly!

      The buzzwords like "game-changing functionality" in TFA are just another MBA-backed litany of wish-it-were-so, completely oblivious to the market or to the actual demands of the customers.

      Wishing is not a strategy. If your business model is based on wishing, you will lose.

      There. Now pay me 1 M GBP as a management consultant.

    5. Re:Really? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      How much "game-changing functionality" can you really work into a fucking coffee machine?

      None, that's why he put that phrase in quotes.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    6. Re:Really? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Oh, it's going to be incredibly game-changing. People are going to stop buying the machines. Take that, game!

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    7. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it works as a morning yoga machine thanks to the demanding coffee consumption position.

    8. Re:Really? by CCarrot · · Score: 4, Informative

      How much "game-changing functionality" can you really work into a fucking coffee machine?

      To me, it sounds like they're planning on emulating Tassimo and their bar-coded brewing system, so the user can use 'milk' pods, tea pods, etc. and the system will brew them differently depending on the scanned and recognized contents (temperature for sure, pressure maybe? size? IDK)

      What they seem to be 'forgetting' is that it was the flexibility and simplicity of the K-Cup system that actually gained them the dominant market share in the first place. Sure you can brew cappucinos and lattes with the Tassimo...but you can use your own favorite coffee brand with the Keurig My K-Cup reusable filter, freshly ground if that's your thing, or spooned out of a Maxwell House container to save money / env. wastage on each cup. Heck, I use my My K-Cup to hold loose tea leaves when I feel like a specialty cuppa...and they're good for two to three cups, too.

      Nope, if they disable their whole BYO ability, I predict that they will wind up in a small corner of a niche market. If they relent and provide a My K-Cup equivalent for the 2.0...well, it's just barely possible that they could survive this bone-headed move, although people will grumble about not having cheap generics available. Either way, watch for stock prices to plunge.

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    9. Re:Really? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Excellent. Now I can have freshly fornicated coffe to go with my orange juice.

    10. Re:Really? by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      Probably as much as the Keurig Vue, which has pretty much bombed in the marketplace.

      In fact, you would think Keurig would have learned from Vue sales that if you make a machine that's not compatible with existing K cups, it doesn't sell. Just adding K cup functionally to the Vue system out of the box (without some third party adapter) would have made them sell like hotcakes and give them the patent encumbered Vue Cups to upsell, instead their going to make a third (Technically forth if you count the Rivo) incompatible brewer that will most likely not accept previous generation cups and wonder why they can't sell the thing but the K cup units fly off the shelves.

      Hell, it wouldn't surprise me if they stop making K cup machines altogether and really screw themselves over.

    11. Re:Really? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      How much "game-changing functionality" can you really work into a fucking coffee machine?

      Ask Bunn ... pour the water in. The second you close the lid, hot water comes out. No waiting. Pure genius :)

    12. Re:Really? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Meh, just glue the barcoded foil of a used K2.0-cup to the top of your repackable unit, and you're done.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    13. Re:Really? by drkim · · Score: 1

      How much "game-changing functionality" can you really work into a fucking coffee machine?

      This one has an I.V. drip unit with continuously adjustable caffeine dosage adjustment.

    14. Re:Really? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Use a hand-cranked grinder.

      1. You get morning exercise. (Remember to switch hands on alternate days so you don't end up with one huge shoulder.)

      2. Wife doesn't need alarm clock.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    15. Re:Really? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      There. Now pay me 1 M GBP as a management consultant.

      Great, just what we need--another crypto-currency du jour.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    16. Re:Really? by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      What's the big deal? The market will either accept or reject this. Just don't buy it! Or buy a real espresso machine. Over the lifetime of an espresso machine, the cost of a coffee is really small, probably in the range of $0.15 - $0.25 range.

  8. Keuring coffee? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I only drink certified genuine OEM HP inkjet printer ink. It's much cheaper than Keuring.

  9. Not my cup of tea by sideslash · · Score: 4, Funny

    Reminds me of when Microsoft attempted to make their own (proprietary, locked in) java.

    1. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you did there

    2. Re:Not my cup of tea by MondoGordo · · Score: 1

      I saw what you did there

    3. Re:Not my cup of tea by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      You mean C#?

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    4. Re:Not my cup of tea by sideslash · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's funny, but no. Actually C# (rather, the CLR and .NET in general) was the project Anders Hejlsberg got reassigned to after Microsoft's Java-based WFC debacle fell on its face. While C# may have started life as "Microsoft's ripoff of Java", it has grown apart in some really significant and awesome ways. I suspect that most people who are fluent in both languages will appreciate what I'm saying, and could name some of the many ways that C# rules and Java drools.

    5. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      parent isn't talking about c#. ms used to make a java compiler and vm and then they tried to add a bunch of proprietary keywords so that people could make non-portable java code. sun sued and won so ms stopped making a jit compiler and a jvm.

    6. Re:Not my cup of tea by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      C# is also an open standard. It is an ECMA/ISO standard (as is the Common Language Infrastructure that underlies the CLR). Java is still Oracle's thing and they get snarky with companies that implement it in ways they don't like (like their BS with Google).

    7. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah... a language that made it out the door a DECADE after Java... and yet I can still run a 20-year-old Java program unmodified without any issues on my Linux box. Heck, my first applets from '95 still run! Try that with C#... on Windows from a decade ago, and you'll quickly see which setup has aged better.

    8. Re:Not my cup of tea by drkim · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of when Microsoft attempted to make their own (proprietary, locked in) java.

      Congratulations!

      This is the first time anyone on /. used a computer code analogy to explain making a cup of coffee.

    9. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh.

      He's not talking about C# son.....

      We're a little older than that.

    10. Re:Not my cup of tea by sideslash · · Score: 1

      Yah... a language that made it out the door a DECADE after Java...

      Yeah, I love that C# came out a decade after Java, and they had opportunity to see what Java did badly and change it.

      and yet I can still run a 20-year-old Java program unmodified without any issues on my Linux box.

      That's cool.

      Heck, my first applets from '95 still run!

      [unnecessarily harsh]But of course nobody cares about your applets.[/unnecessarily harsh]

      Try that with C#... on Windows from a decade ago, and you'll quickly see which setup has aged better.

      I don't really care which has aged better in the past. I care about mainstream adoption _today_, and about which language as it exists _today_ is more powerful, expressive, maintainable, etc. If I program Java today, I won't restrict myself to the language subset from 20 years ago, and similarly I am happy to use new C# features that kick Java's behind (like async, var keyword, and embarrassingly many others).

      The big missing perspective from your rant is that software engineering is a forward looking discipline, not a backward looking one.

    11. Re:Not my cup of tea by sideslash · · Score: 1

      Whoosh. He's not talking about C# son..... We're a little older than that.

      O my apparent father, as you are a well-aged and wise AC, please enlighten the rest of us. When wcrowe said "You mean C#?", what was he talking about if it was not C#?

    12. Re:Not my cup of tea by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      Whoosh yourself. I was making a joke. I know there was a MS version of Java. I have a copy of it that I got in 1999.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    13. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the original AC, I just meant to reply to wcrowe not you.

      Anyone remember Visual J?

  10. Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the circuitry to control a heater and pump are SO COMPLEX. If it isn't a modchip, it's going to be a firmware reflash. I give it about three hours before this is cracked now that it has made it into the news to get that much attention.

    1. Re:Yeah right by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2

      My guess RFID. By one regular pod, cut RFID chip out of it, tape to the bottom of subsequent generic pods.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Yeah right by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      There's no way they can put a chip in a coffee pod. It's just too expensive. Chips make sense for printer cartridges, where the cartridge costs $30-90, so a $0.10-0.15 chip doesn't make much difference in the parts cost. For a $0.50-0.65 coffee pod, it doesn't make any sense at all.

      The only way I see this working is if they try to patent the cup design somehow, to prevent people from making knock-off cups/pods that fit into the unit. I have no idea how they think this will work legally though; past attempts at such things have never worked, which is why there's all kinds of third-party auto parts out there that are virtually identical to the OEM parts.

    3. Re:Yeah right by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      More like, tape it to the RFID reader.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Yeah right by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      sodastream does something similar to this with their CO2 containers -- using non-standard valve connectors to prevent people from refilling their CO2 tanks =/

    5. Re:Yeah right by aviators99 · · Score: 1

      One other thing they could do would be a unique barcode or other machine-readable sequence on each pod, and then have the machine phone home to make sure that the code is valid and hasn't been used before. Any word on whether 2.0 requires an Internet connection?

      The great thing about that idea is that slashdot'ers could systematically disable all of the real pods :-)

    6. Re:Yeah right by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      One other thing they could do would be a unique barcode or other machine-readable sequence on each pod, and then have the machine phone home to make sure that the code is valid and hasn't been used before. Any word on whether 2.0 requires an Internet connection?

      The great thing about that idea is that slashdot'ers could systematically disable all of the real pods :-)

      "Hi, this is Sundeep, umm I mean Jay at Keurig.

      We've noticed your cofeemaker is having problems.

      If you'll just click on this link, we can do remote troubleshooting for you."

    7. Re:Yeah right by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's possible, but sounds implausible. Barcodes can't store that much information, and you'd need a really long barcode to store a long enough number for all the coffee pods they might expect to make. Maybe though.

      It'd be funny if they did this, and someone hacked a Keurig machine to report back to Keurig that lots and lots of codes were used, when in fact they weren't, so that many random users would find many K-cups unusable.

    8. Re:Yeah right by seven7h · · Score: 1

      I would suspect it wouldn't be a chip, possibly a QR code or something similar that the machine will read. The QR code will probably contain some sort of key which the machine will decode and determine if it matches some algorithm. And it will also probably contain some information about how to brew the coffee.

    9. Re:Yeah right by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      Of course an RFID chip makes sense. That way you can sell your overpriced locked in coffee pods for even MORE money!

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    10. Re:Yeah right by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      My guess RFID. By one regular pod, cut RFID chip out of it, tape to the bottom of subsequent generic pods.

      FWIW we tried that with our Stratasys 3d printer. It remembered the RFID number and remembered that the print cartridge was out of print material, so sticking the rfid tag to a new, third-party, 1/4 the price, filled to the brim container of print material did precisely nothing for us. I have no idea if the keurig will do the same. Oh, it was also a pain in the butt because they'd built it into the side of the cartridge, so when we cut it out it wouldn't simply stick on the new cartridge as it had a flat side and the resultant cartridge+rfid tag wouldn't fit in the printer, so we had to bodge something up by putting it on the front where the door closed and hoping it would be detected. It was, but see above.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    11. Re:Yeah right by aviators99 · · Score: 1

      That's possible, but sounds implausible. Barcodes can't store that much information, and you'd need a really long barcode to store a long enough number for all the coffee pods they might expect to make. Maybe though.

      QR codes could easily store enough. But I'd be more worried about:

      It'd be funny if they did this, and someone hacked a Keurig machine to report back to Keurig that lots and lots of codes were used, when in fact they weren't, so that many random users would find many K-cups unusable.

      Isn't that what I already said??

    12. Re:Yeah right by tepples · · Score: 1

      Barcodes can't store that much information

      Dot codes can though.

    13. Re:Yeah right by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      From what I hear, they already patented it and it expired a little over a year ago. This must be their reaction to the expiration.

    14. Re:Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if the machine has internal memory and keeps track of what pod id's have been used already.

    15. Re:Yeah right by technomom · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be at all surprised to see that they could build NFC right into the packaging itself. Yes, it might make the pods a bit more expensive, but I could see where maybe Keurig could have cut a pretty good deal with an NFC wholesaler to bring it into play, especially if the cost is offset with some patent sharing. There's more than one way to offset cost.

    16. Re:Re:Yeah right by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The longer you have the machine the longer it takes to start brewing?

      If flash really that cheap now?

      I'm guessing a FIFO with room for few dozen IDs at most. Enough to make it impractical, unless someone can stuff IDs in fast.

      Won't matter, not worth hacking. Anybody who buys one, deserves to be punished.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    17. Re:Yeah right by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The Vue was the reaction to the expiration. This is a reaction to the market failure of the Vue.

      I'm going with 'short the parent company'. They've lost their business model and are too clueless to milk their incumbent position for the little bit it's worth. There's still money to be made, but their glory days are over.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    18. Re:Yeah right by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      gotta set up a website so you and other users can trade RFID chips

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  11. This will not end well... by wwalker98 · · Score: 2

    Although I am a heavy user of their current line of products, I appreciate the fact that I have the choice to buy unlicensed pods that are either cheaper or represent coffee that is otherwise unavailable. Surely this will kick open the door for a competitor that can take advantage of their self-disruption!

  12. "Interactive" by Ignacio · · Score: 1

    Insert pod, push button. How much interactivity does making coffee *need*?

    1. Re:"Interactive" by hawguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Insert pod, push button. How much interactivity does making coffee *need*?

      I'm guessing that the chip in the pod tailors the brewing cycle for the coffee (or tea) in the pod for the best possible quality. Well, as "best" as you can get with pre-ground beans that have sat on the shelf in a pod for a few months.

    2. Re:"Interactive" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if the chip will stop the problem of the pods exploding when you put them in the machine at high altitudes (Colorado).

    3. Re:"Interactive" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no chip in the pod now. Right now, there's no way of distinguishing from one pod to another by the machine as far as I can tell.
      Flavia already have a single serve system. It reads a barcode and uses presets tied to each barcode.

    4. Re:"Interactive" by steveha · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that the chip in the pod tailors the brewing cycle for the coffee (or tea) in the pod for the best possible quality.

      That's not enough to make people embrace the lock-in, I don't think. To anyone who is already okay with these single-serving machines, that won't make a difference.

      So, they have their choice: stop making the old machines to try to force everyone to upgrade, or have people not care about the upgrade.

      P.S. Nespresso machines read a bar code on the pod, which customizes the brewing. So custom brewing isn't even a new idea in single-serving coffee makers.

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    5. Re:"Interactive" by hawguy · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that the chip in the pod tailors the brewing cycle for the coffee (or tea) in the pod for the best possible quality.

      That's not enough to make people embrace the lock-in, I don't think.

      No body "embraces" lock-in -- they tolerate it.

      To anyone who is already okay with these single-serving machines, that won't make a difference.

      So, they have their choice: stop making the old machines to try to force everyone to upgrade, or have people not care about the upgrade.

      P.S. Nespresso machines read a bar code on the pod, which customizes the brewing. So custom brewing isn't even a new idea in single-serving coffee makers.

      That depends how good Keurig is at marketing it as a feature rather than as a limitation "Each Keurig K-Cup is individually tuned to match exactly with the coffee, we measure 17 different variables such as roasting time, acidity, moisture level, etc and our unique system automatically tunes your coffee maker to brew the best cup of coffee possible. Taste tests prove that K-DRM makes the best coffee". It doesn't matter whether consumers can actually tell the different, all the matters is that they think they can.

      I could be completely wrong on this guess, but I don't know what other possible "game-changing functionality” they've come up with the justify the vendor-locked k-cups.

    6. Re:"Interactive" by sjames · · Score: 1

      Just watch, it'll produce something that tastes almost but not quite entirely unlike tea.

  13. Act now... by CambodiaSam · · Score: 2

    hackmykeurig.com is currently available for purchase. I suspect variations will become popular.

  14. Anti competitive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This won't be legal to sell in Europe by the sounds of it..

    1. Re:Anti competitive by climb_no_fear · · Score: 4, Funny

      That coffee is so bad, that it isn't legal in Europe anyway.

    2. Re:Anti competitive by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      That coffee is so bad, that it isn't legal in Europe anyway.

      I presume it's in violation of the Geneva Conventions.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:Anti competitive by akozakie · · Score: 1

      And why would we want it? Seriously, we have good coffee here.

      I keep hearing things like "only a douchebag would take the last of the coffee without making a new pot" - seriously? You drink random drip coffee from a pot that's been heated for the last hour? I would, if I had no choice and needed some coffeine, but... come on!

      My espresso machine at home is 4 years old, cheap (no auto) but good. Coffee from a nearby coffee shop, their own mix, roasted in house every second day, pure arabica of course. I grind it at home, enough for two days (yeah, I know, too much too rarely, but I'm not that much of a perfectionist). A great espresso every morning. Nowhere near as good as what I tried in Italy, but way above average here.

      Let's take the cost of the machine and the one service cost when it broke last year. The cost of the grinder (a good one actually). The cost of coffee per 100g and serving size... 4 years... 4 cups daily on average (low estimate - I don't live alone)... Something like $0.43 per serving, excluding cost of electricity and water (cheap but low calcium, in large bottles, no real difference in taste from tap water, but good for the machine, doesn't require decalcification as often - my time is not free). Even with those, still under $0.5. Give me one reason to buy this.

      Even at work if I need coffee it's the same coffee as at home, always fresh, made as needed, but from a drip machine. Not nearly as good, but oh, well... Two years ago we had espresso machines at work, but they were too cheap for heavy use - they slowly deteriorated and after too many problems thay were eliminated. I'm still hoping they will buy a couple of good ones. Another team bought one for themselves (legal if it stays in their kitchen), so maybe we should just do the same - except we don't have a separate kitchen, so it would have to be good enough to handle about 40 espressos per day - not the cheapest model... Maybe we could get the neighbouring teams to chip in...

      I'd never buy any machine that would tie me to a single brand of coffee, because it simply is not good enough. I've searched for a good source for years and I will stick with it until I find something better. Why would I buy something that sat on the shelf, roasted and ground, for hell knows how long?

    4. Re:Anti competitive by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2

      the gevalia conventions perhaps?

    5. Re:Anti competitive by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Is Europe really that strict on anti-competition? Games-consoles are allowed to refuse to play games not signed by the console manufacturer, for instance.

    6. Re:Anti competitive by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      I remember the printer cartridge case. The judge's argument was that the 'DRM' used in the print cartridges was not used to protect a creative work so the DMCA, or whatever is the EU equivalent, did not apply. So making clones of the cartridges or offering refills is perfectly legal.

  15. Not DRM, just an old business model by EMG+at+MU · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Get out your cartridge razor handle. Find a razor cartridge from a different manufacture and try to mate the two, e.g: Schick stick with Gillette cartridge. It will not work. There is no reason it will not work besides the companies want you to only buy their razors.

    This isn't DRM it is just an update on an old business model that happens to use a small circuit to achieve the same result.

    1. Re:Not DRM, just an old business model by wwalker98 · · Score: 1

      The difference being that consumers want variety from their coffee. Not so much with razors.

    2. Re:Not DRM, just an old business model by Microlith · · Score: 1

      No, this is akin to the Lexmark case back in 2005 where they used a chip to detect and reject 3rd party cartridges in an effort to protect their ink-selling business model. Thankfully they lost that case so I imagine that whatever "solution" GMCR comes up with will be handily defeated and the 3rd party pod market will continue unabated.

      And when the lawsuits fly, their victim can cite that case and have the suit dismissed.

    3. Re:Not DRM, just an old business model by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not quite the same thing. This would prevent a 3rd party from making a cheaper cartridge for your razor.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:Not DRM, just an old business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe they are brewing a patent for DRM,

    5. Re:Not DRM, just an old business model by EMG+at+MU · · Score: 1

      Maybe you don't but when I owned one I wanted whatever razor was on sale that week. I don't care if I have one handle and another cartridge.

    6. Re:Not DRM, just an old business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's my question:

      What the fuck are they going to do that I can't just manually fuck with it anyways to by-pass it?

      Basically anything that they can reasonably do with the cup I could tear off and put on another cup, or just copy and tape it on. Make it a funny shape? I'll just use an empty cup filled with what I want.

    7. Re:Not DRM, just an old business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might have a point if the handles weren't nearly free...

    8. Re:Not DRM, just an old business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is why I bought a double edge razor handle. Sure, it's not as aggressive as today's razors, so I need a double pass, but the blades are dirt cheap, and frankly, it still does a great job. The handle will be good enough I can will it to my children someday.

    9. Re:Not DRM, just an old business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And keep it dry and out of moist enviornments, like the bathroom, after use. The edge won't rust on you, and you'll get far more use out of it

    10. Re:Not DRM, just an old business model by EMG+at+MU · · Score: 1

      Eh, I also have a DE razor. It is cheaper after the initial investment. Maybe it is just me but the shave is no where as close and I bleed just as much. Plus it takes much longer. Since I'm cheap i'll still use it but I'm not too crazy about them.

    11. Re:Not DRM, just an old business model by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      that's why you should use a safety razor, the blades are dirt cheap and there's at least 10 brands that will work with the standard double edged blade.

    12. Re:Not DRM, just an old business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After using cartridge razors for many, many years, I also bought a decent DE razor and blades. It's far far cheaper after the initial investment, but I wholeheartedly agree that the shave just isn't as close and it takes much longer. With enough practise you can avoid bleeding, but if you're consistently bleeding with a cartridge razor then you're doing it wrong!

      Gave up on the DE, just didn't have enough time in the morning and I dislike having to focus that much after I've just woken up.

    13. Re:Not DRM, just an old business model by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      And this is why I bought a double edge razor handle.

      Right around the time I was considering making the switch, Woot was offering Mach3-compatible cartridges at somewhere near a dollar each for a dozen. Considering that the "genuine" cartridges usually sell for 3-4x more, that was a good-enough savings for now, and so far they've mostly gotten the job done. (The springs in one crapped out after only one or two uses.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  16. Shouldn't be used anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those things are such an environmental disaster no-one in their right mind should use that crap anyway.

    1. Re:Shouldn't be used anyway by plover · · Score: 1

      In our city the pods are collected and recycled in a separate bag. They won't accept pods full of grounds, so they require the aluminum pods be run through a recycling press to crush the grounds out of them. The grounds are to be composted by the users in the same way as they would any other coffee grounds.

      Aluminum recycles with pretty good efficiency. While they're still somewhat wasteful compared to a reusable container or a traditional coffee pot, they're hardly an environmental disaster. The packaging is just cardboard and aluminum.

      --
      John
    2. Re:Shouldn't be used anyway by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      What city? So we can not move there. Sounds like a hellhole to me.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Shouldn't be used anyway by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      With the withdrawal of Alcoa from the Australian market, we will no longer have Aluminum recycling locally available.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  17. utilitarian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Coffee is quite a bit more utilitarian than say, a movie. Clothes are this way too. This is a fatal business move for keurig - it's something even grandmothers will understand- not to buy the coffee machine that needs proprietary cups. Buy the knock off that works with all the cups you can buy in the store. I predict grocery stores with chipped kcups on hand they can't seem to get rid of.

  18. Has anyone ever gotten... by stox · · Score: 1, Insightful

    a decent cup of coffee out of a Keurig machine anyway?

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Has anyone ever gotten... by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Don't know about Coffee, but it does make a nice cup of tea or Hot Chocolate. For me it is a convenience factor of not having to wait for water to boil, then watch a tea bag so it is not over/under brewed. I pop in a pod and hit a button, then let the dog out, and come back to a nicely brewed cup of tea. If my dog takes a bit long, worse case I come back to a cup of tea at the perfect drinking temperature (which means I need to drink the tea fast before it gets too cold) as opposed to over brewed tea that is too bitter. My dad has one too and drinks Coffee, but instead of a pot a day, has 1-2 cups. He still grinds his own beans, but now can limit his intake without a lot of waste.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    2. Re:Has anyone ever gotten... by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Sorry. The pods make the worst hot chocolate on planet earth. It works great with a bag of Swiss Miss and no pod though.

      And my wife loves some of the Keurig coffee cups. She also uses the refillable pod when she gets a can cheap or free, but she generally prefers the K-Cups. She's terrible at making coffee. With Keurig, there's nothing to think about. Now, with DRM, we'll never buy that model.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:Has anyone ever gotten... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a decent cup of coffee out of a Keurig machine anyway?

      Yes, often, frequently.

      My definition of "a decent cup of coffee" is the same as my definition of "a decent girl":

      Fresh, hot, readily available, and big cups.

    4. Re:Has anyone ever gotten... by Gryle · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. At my last job the boss brought a Keurig for everyone to use. I found the coffee a bit weak for my liking but it heated water a lot faster than my drip machine so I used it for making a lot of hot chocolate during the winter months.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  19. Re:Keuring coffee? No thanks. by stox · · Score: 2

    Probably tastes better, too.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  20. functionality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    “game-changing functionality” ... you mean like coffee that actually tastes good?

  21. Why not... by hamster_nz · · Score: 2

    ...just supply a better quality, more desirable coffee? Oh no, that would be too hard!

    DRM technology to the rescue,forcing users to buy crappy or overpriced coffee.

    1. Re:Why not... by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Right, because this patent will give Keurig a monopoly. In a year or two the only way to get a cup of coffee will be buy a Keurig machine.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    2. Re:Why not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, DRM works well for the music industry and ... well, maybe not so well. My guess is Keurig loses market share over this one.

    3. Re:Why not... by blandcramration · · Score: 1

      What power of the gods is forcing your hand to purchase a Keurig?

  22. The Real Question by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The real question is - after the "Keurig 2.0" hits the shelves, will I be able to use the "Keurig 2.0" pods with my "Keurig 1.0?"

    Or are they going to screw themselves out of my money by trying to force me to "update" to the new model (probably by altering the design of the K-Cup ever-so-slightly), thereby ensuring that the only products I buy for my existing $160 coffee maker are non-Green Mountain brand?

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:The Real Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've already updated their pods once. Likelihood seems high.

    2. Re:The Real Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Brews For Sure"

    3. Re:The Real Question by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      "Brews For Sure"

      I hadn't seen a truly underrated post until that; kudos to you, AC.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  23. I have left companies over coffee... by Electrawn · · Score: 1

    One company I worked at had a Flavia machine. Flavia is expensive as hell but the packages always work. Then they got rid of it for regular coffee. I left. (One of many reasons).

    The next company had regular coffee and then "upgraded" to a Keurig machine. Every other day the machine would overflow is some spectacular fashion. I left.

    My current company had regular coffee,was acquired and a perk of the new megacorp is Flavia machines in every office. Happy bee.

    The patent on the Keurig has run out, so they are going to try and borrow the playbook from HP/Lexmark/et all? Hahaha. Sell short.

    1. Re:I have left companies over coffee... by gurps_npc · · Score: 2

      Wow. I did not think anyone in the world that would quit their job because the coffee machine was bad. Have you considered asking to be allowed to bring you own machine into the office?

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    2. Re:I have left companies over coffee... by krups+gusto · · Score: 0

      Hmm... I quit a job because they moved *to* a flavia machine.

    3. Re:I have left companies over coffee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he quit because the coffee machine broke, I suspect he isn't missed there.

    4. Re:I have left companies over coffee... by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Wow. I did not think anyone in the world that would quit their job because the coffee machine was bad. Have you considered asking to be allowed to bring you own machine into the office?

      Bad coffee is often a symptom. Expect other unpleasant things to go on.

    5. Re:I have left companies over coffee... by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Flavia makes horribly watery tea. If the coffee is anything close to the tea, (I don't drink coffee) I would hate it.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    6. Re:I have left companies over coffee... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I worked for a bank. They had pre-measured fucking Yuban and a cheap drip coffee maker.

      I once attempted to make drinkable coffee by using two bags of Yuban (bad plan I know, but I needed some Joe). Until I quit that job I was known as Mr. Twobagger.

      Never work anyplace that cheaps out on coffee. It speaks volumes. Everything else will be as bad.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:I have left companies over coffee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ain't kiddin' bub. I work at walmart, and on the rare occasion management lets the personnel lady brew us some coffee, it tastes like motherfucking diarrhea water. I'd rather get caffeine from licking a herptastic hooker's empty fucking cup rim.

    8. Re:I have left companies over coffee... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      My current office doesn't have a coffee machine at all (though it has a sign up at the entrance saying to switch it off at night), instead we get caterers sized tins of Nescafe Blend 43.

      You don't work here for the perks.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    9. Re:I have left companies over coffee... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      if the patent has run out, then if they dick around too much someone will make a keurig-compatible machine

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    10. Re:I have left companies over coffee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I almost just quit over being moved to a new seat.

      I had a nice room to myself where I could play music or come in late without a bunch of upset eyes. See I code hours from home that no one can see so I'd come in late the next day (with my commits in SVN/Git at 3am as my proof) and enjoy no issues.

      Then I got moved into a room with lots of other developers. Now they bitch when I try to play music, the lighting it bad, I cannot see out the window, and none of these guys work at home so I now have to rush in early just so these small brains feel like it's "fair".

      I stopped working from home since it didn't benefit me anymore. I spent my time when all hopped up on coffee codidng my own stuff instead at home. Then of course the boss noticed output fell and I explained why.

      Something like a seating position or coffee availability is only simple if your day to day life means nothing. Otherwise that stuff means *everything* to a detail oriented coder who just wants to smile every day and be happy.

      For me blaring music at work in a private spot and being able to come in at 11am because I worked 3 hours from home the night before led to a real comfortable work/home balance. By trashing that with a simple move they almost lost their best guy. And I am the most senior developer by a long shot at this place.

      Essentially a Linux kernel hacker compared to a VB coder. That much better...... So yeah they will be moving me back here shortly and I'll stay.

    11. Re:I have left companies over coffee... by imahawki · · Score: 1

      Flavia coffee is NOT good. It is identical to Keurig except the container the coffee grounds are stored in is a foil/plastic "bag" instead of a cup.

  24. Don't like it - make your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say the same about all forms of DRM.

    If you don't like it:

    Don't buy the movie.
    Don't buy the music.
    Don't buy the game.
    Don't buy the coffee.

    I don't understand the crusade to have everything on your terms - without doing it yourself. Commercial goods, OSS, etc.
    Take it for what it is... or don't, and that is a perfectly acceptable choice.

    1. Re:Don't like it - make your own by tepples · · Score: 1

      Don't buy the movie.

      And when you don't get movie-related inside jokes in a particular community, prepare to endure "turn in your geek card" taunts.

      Don't buy the music.

      Even writing your own music might get you sued if you end up accidentally copying something proprietary. See for example Bright Tunes Music v. Harrisongs Music.

      Don't buy the game.

      In general, the free software community has proven far less able to create the "assets" (meshes, textures, maps, audio, etc.) than the code of a video game.

  25. close the pod bay door, HAL by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry Dave, I can't let you brew that.

    I'd damn sure reprogram his memory banks with an very large axe for that kind of insubordination.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:close the pod bay door, HAL by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      Daisy... Daaaiiissyyyy

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:close the pod bay door, HAL by drkim · · Score: 1

      Daisy... Daaaiiissyyyy

      Weirdly, this analogy rings true of how I feel when I don't get enough caffeine,

      Like someone if floating around in my brain unplugging memory circuits...

  26. Go ahead Keurig... make my day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll make and sell conversion kits to unfuck your Keurig 2.0.

    1. Re:Go ahead Keurig... make my day. by eclectro · · Score: 1

      I'll make and sell conversion kits to unfuck your Keurig 2.0

      The new pods will have a plastic tap and notch so that they will be the only ones that physically fit in the coffee maker.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  27. Just extened the technology a little... by ProjectArcturus · · Score: 1

    ...and this could be awesome for my workplace. We have someone who never ever removes their used K-Cup from the Keurig. Maybe I could blacklist their "Caribou Obsidian" K-Cups from the machine, or program it to only brew the tiniest mug size, hehehe Stick a micro-sd/data logging on it and I'll finally know what time they sneak in...

    1. Re:Just extened the technology a little... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Count yourself lucky. We've got one that won't fill the water supply.

      If it's empty, she fills her dirty cup with water and adds that water to the reservoir. Disgusting pig.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  28. But its good for the consumer. by djrosen · · Score: 1

    But DRM is good for the consumer! Just ask the MAFIAA, they'll tell you whats best for you and you'll like it, no really.

  29. where this time? by Connie_Lingus · · Score: 2

    i'm wondering where exactly are we going to have to put the piece of black tape or sharpie scribble to disable it...

    lol DRM...will they ever learn?

    knock knock: "OMFG it's the coffee police.,..AGAIN!!"
    "damn, so who forgot the firewall the damn thing this time??"
    "well...shit i was surfing for porn and disabled the FW for freakydeaks,com.."

    pound pound "OPEN UP...WE CAN SMELL THE CRIME BREWING HERE DO NOT RUN"

    --
    never bring a twinkie to a food fight.
  30. Hayes compatible, anyone? by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

    This means my next Keurig will be a Keurig-compatible machine, sans-DRM.
    I can't imagine anything they could possibly add to the "pods" to warrant moving way from all of the clone pods & machines. (Freshness date chips? Custom brewing settings?)

    I smell a failing business model brewing...

    1. Re:Hayes compatible, anyone? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Hayes compatible, anyone?

      %b6viaby5i+++NO CAFETIERE+++

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  31. Go ahead and shoot yourself in the foot by kheldan · · Score: 2

    I couldn't believe this whole "Keurig" thing when I saw it, it creates all sorts of plastic waste and is expensive per cup, plus having to have an expensive and complex machine to use it and not as much control over what ends up in your coffee cup. If they want to shoot themselves in the foot by locking everyone else out of the process rather than allowing laziness to help proliferate their coffeemaking process, then I guess that's their decision and good riddance to them when they kill off their own market. Meanwhile, get a French Press, people, they even make little ones for single-cup coffee, and it's really not that difficult to use.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:Go ahead and shoot yourself in the foot by beanpoppa · · Score: 1

      I have a mini-refillable k-cup. Costs about 10c in coffee per cup, and no waste. Sure, it's not a gourmet cup of coffee, but thankfully, I'm not a coffee snob. I'm also not an audio snob, a wine snob, etc. Saves me a lot of money, and I can still be happy.

    2. Re:Go ahead and shoot yourself in the foot by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have an espresso machine. Also no waste, and it makes much better coffee. It cost me five dollars. You're not going to be able to swing the cost card here.

      I also have a Kenwood amp, and classic Sennheiser headphones. The Kenwood was forty bucks and the Sennheisers were $30 if you count refoaming them and a new connector.

      We also drink really great wine, because the local grocery outlet is owned by a guy who also owns a liquor warehouse and we regularly get $20-50 bottles for $3-10.

      We save a lot of money, and we are still able to be snobs.

      Think outside the k-cup

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Go ahead and shoot yourself in the foot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go slit your fucking wrists communist, nigger loving fucktarded faggot.

      - beanpoppa (1305757)

    4. Re:Go ahead and shoot yourself in the foot by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      I couldn't believe this whole "Keurig" thing when I saw it, it creates all sorts of plastic waste

      I see this being brought up constantly. The whole "waste" thing. I find it amazing that concern for waste has become so widespread. Comically widespread. This waste that everyone is complaining about amounts to a fraction of a gram of plastic, a tiny little plastic pod, per cup of coffee. When is the last time you heard people complaining about Dunkin Donuts or Starbucks because of waste? Surely a huge polystyrene cup is considerably more waste than a tiny plastic pod? But no, it's the Keurig that's wasteful.

      Up next: cigarettes are wasteful because each pack is sealed with a layer of cellophane.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    5. Re:Go ahead and shoot yourself in the foot by kheldan · · Score: 1

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4853869&cid=46396381 "I see this being brought up constantly"

      It's not just that it's plastic waste. It's the used coffee grounds inside it, and the foil on top. In order to recycle it, someone has to take it all apart and separate it all out. I'm no wacko environmentalist, but I do squick at things that are single-use and made of semi-durable materials like that.

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4853869&cid=46396379 "go slit your.."

      Go back to 4chan/b, kid, you're not impressing anyone here.

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4853869&cid=46395417 "Think outside the K-cup"

      Um, I use a French Press myself. Not sure why you're even responding to me.

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4853869&cid=46390979 "I have a mini-refillable k-cup."

      Sure, but if you'd read the article (or even the headline) you'd see that they're moving in the direction of making it so you can't use those anymore. What then? Like I said, let 'em kill off their own business.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    6. Re:Go ahead and shoot yourself in the foot by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1
      You have a very strange way of posting. I'm not sure why you provided the URL to my comment, but I'm especially confused by why you provided the URLs to three comments that have nothing to do with mine. Anyway, I'll just respond to the part of your post that seems to address what I said.

      It's not just that it's plastic waste. It's the used coffee grounds inside it, and the foil on top. In order to recycle it, someone has to take it all apart and separate it all out. I'm no wacko environmentalist, but I do squick at things that are single-use and made of semi-durable materials like that.

      So let me get this straight. Pods are wasteful because it's a lot of work to take them apart when they are recycled? If they're being recycled, how are they wasteful? If they're not being recycled, then they're not being taken apart and separated, so how is it a lot of work?

      More importantly, how is it that throwing away a tiny fleck of plastic can be worse than using a giant polystyrene cup that can't be recycled? Where's all the faux outrage over Dunkin Donuts and virtually any no-name coffee shop serving coffee in Styrofoam cups? Penny wise, pound retarded.

      Also, this article was the first time I noticed how huge the overlap is between coffee drinkers and "green" crazies. In an article about Keurig and DRM, half the comments are about how "wasteful" coffee pods are, but not a peep about the polystyrene alternative.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    7. Re:Go ahead and shoot yourself in the foot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't believe this whole "Keurig" thing when I saw it, it creates all sorts of plastic waste and is expensive per cup, plus having to have an expensive and complex machine to use it and not as much control over what ends up in your coffee cup.

      Agree on the waste and expense. And those little cups don't hold much coffee and it was ground weeks ago so the product could be better.

      Disagree about the machine being complex. You stick a pod in and punch a button, and it makes coffee. From time to time you empty out the catch bin that fills up with used pods. Pretty simple. The machine itself isn't that expensive, really, so I disagree with that part of your complaint as well.

      There are some use cases where the Keurig machine makes sense.

      In a small office, where people don't agree on what kind of coffee they prefer to drink, the office can provide different kinds of pods. Specific case: I am the only one in my office who ever wants decaf, and the office doesn't buy decaf beans because they just get old and need to be thrown out. I'd rather have real coffee than K-cup coffee, but I'll settle for K-cup to get some decaf in the late afternoon.

      Also, there is a small town I visit about once per year, and in that small town there is a hamburger shack. They have coffee on the menu, and if you order it, they use a K-cup machine to immediately make your cup of coffee. This makes perfect sense to me: any "batch" system for coffee will make too much, and I'd rather have a cup of lame K-cup coffee than coffee that has been sitting on a warmer for hours. Coffee really isn't a core competency for this burger shack, so a K-cup machine lets them provide a better product than most other systems I can imagine them using.

      I won't buy a K-cup machine, but there are non-insane reasons why they are popular. They have legit use cases.

      P.S. I think an AeroPress is even better than a plunger pot ("french press"). It's easier to clean up as well. It's what I will use to make coffee if the power fails or I go camping.

    8. Re:Go ahead and shoot yourself in the foot by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I posted that way because Slashdot doesn't provide a way to respond to more than one comment at a time, and I don't have all day to wait around for it to allow me to post responses to several comments, so at least I provide the URLs so what I have to say isn't completely disconnected and out of context.

      The problem with the plastic waste of Keurig cups is that they're plastic in the first place. These things don't need to exist at all; there are other methods of making coffee that don't involve any single-use plastic and foil bits. For decades you've been able to get metal filter single-cup coffeemakers, or small French presses. Use your own cup, and there's no waste at all. And by the way what makes you think everyone is responsibly recycling these Keurig cups in the first place? Many people are lazy and just toss them in the trash.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    9. Re:Go ahead and shoot yourself in the foot by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Yes, plastic, way worse than polystyrene, which we've been happily making cups out of for decades, with nary a peep from the green crowd. Where each cup has the mass of dozens of these plastic pods, takes even longer than flimsy plastic to biodegrade, and can't be recycled. Again, penny wise, pound retarded.

      Sure, a French press is "greener". But you're missing the point entirely by focusing on little flecks of plastic while giant mounds of Styrofoam fill our landfills.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    10. Re:Go ahead and shoot yourself in the foot by kheldan · · Score: 1

      You need to get off this 'polystyrene' thing. I don't know ANYWHERE that serves coffee in cups made of any sort of plastic, so I don't know what you're talking about, and I sure as hell am not advocating substituting one sort of plastic for another! Use a coffee cup that you bring with you, and stop using goddamn 'Keurig' shit to make your coffee, that's what I'm saying.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  32. Keurig patents expired... by mlts · · Score: 1

    Since the K-cup patents expired in 2012, I don't see why other companies don't just create their own K-cup friendly coffeemakers. Vue cups are covered by a new round of patents, but I wonder if the tradeoffs that the Vue cups provide may be worth the added expense by consumers, so K-cups may be an idea as a "standard".

    1. Re: Keurig patents expired... by Selivanow · · Score: 2

      They already do. I purchased a Mr. Coffee unit that takes K cups and also comes with a single-serving sized filter.

      --
      -- ...trying to make digital files uncopyable is like trying to make water not wet. -Bruce Schneier
    2. Re:Keurig patents expired... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've seen 'off brand' K-Cup brewers around, so I think this move is pretty much designed to sucker people into buying something that they recently patented, and can control for a few more years.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    3. Re:Keurig patents expired... by ynp7 · · Score: 2

      K-Cup compatible brewers and cups have been on the market for a while now. This is precisely the reason that Keurig are adding these DRM-like controls to their new machines. I guess that was easier than coming up with a new invention as innovative as the K-Cup, or simply competing based on quality and price.

    4. Re:Keurig patents expired... by Macgrrl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm really surprised to have gotten this far down the thread without anyone mentioning the parallels to ink jet cartridges with DRM. I'm looking at you Epson.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    5. Re:Keurig patents expired... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Because lots of people already have Keurig machines which are now a household name. People don't tell their spouse (and/or boss) "let's get an automated single-serving coffee machine.", they say "Let's get a Keurig." (or Tassimo to a lesser extent).

    6. Re:Keurig patents expired... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if this can change though, so the term "Keurig" ends up being like zipper, Kleenex, Xerox, or similar. This way, when someone says to buy a Keurig, they are not meaning a Keurig automated coffee maker, but a "keurig", a generic version of such.

    7. Re:Keurig patents expired... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Hewlett-Packard. Did you know that the freakin' things have *region coding*??

      Turns out my Singapore-purchased printer doesn't work with genuine HP cartridges bought in the UK. WTF is that?? To add insult to injury, HP wants you to call some sort of toll line in order to get the magic codes to reset the printer.

      So, the defective printer cartridges have gone back to the store, the printer's going in the recycling bin, my planned HP server order just got torn up, and decades of one customer's loyalty and goodwill have gone down the tubes all in one fell swoop. Fuck DRM, and fuck HP.

    8. Re:Keurig patents expired... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and I'm not really that surprised that I've read every comment and there hasn't been any discussion as to the benefits of this technology. Too many people are polarized by buzzwords these days and don't consider the whole picture. At some point the engineering mindset left this community and the quality of discourse left with it.

      There's a ritual that I learned a few years ago that I haven't seen mentioned here. In order to save money some friends and I started ordering K-Cups in bulk from Amazon. Did you know there are a plethora of replica K-Cups for sale on Amazon? Thus the ritual was born: open the cases and shake a K-Cup from each box. If the coffee inside the cup hits both the top and bottom of the K-Cup it's a bootleg filled with who knows what coffee; perhaps more importantly where it came from. Reason for the ritual: Real Coffee K-Cups are filtered, the filter is on the bottom of the K-Cup, it isn't completely hollow like the bootleg cups.

      See where the DRM concept comes in handy? DRM is a huge concept, and it's entirely nebulous; it's a proper problem, see, and you can't solve proper problems without seeing, and understanding, all sides.

    9. Re:Keurig patents expired... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it could, but nobody has come up with a simple generic name for them yet like "tissue" or "photocopier". If I remember correctly, the zipper was patented until it became such a household name that they weren't able to trademark it anymore.

  33. Volume of Water Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only big technical problem that the Keurig system seems to have that I've experienced is that the volume of water required per cup is not clearly marked. This means that if I accidently pour 8 oz of water into a 6 oz hot chocolate cartridge, it will be watered down and taste awful! A smarter system would detect the amount of water appropriate for the cartridge and only dispense that amount of water through it to enable consistently awesome hot beverages. Or they could set a standard volume and stick to it.

    1. Re:Volume of Water Needed by plover · · Score: 1

      Well, their chip system could certainly solve this problem for you. It could encode "I need 6 oz water at 212 degrees" in the message it sends to the coffee maker. Of course, Tassimo's barcodes already do this on their T-discs.

      --
      John
  34. My K-Cup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "My K-Cup" device that is available for the current Keurig machines will allow the use of custom-ground coffee.

    The two concepts are not incompatible.

    1. Re:My K-Cup by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

      This is how I primarily use mine. I grind my own beans and use the My K-Cup.

      If they do away with that, then it will be my last Keurig machine.

  35. The New "Standard" business Model by DadLeopard · · Score: 1

    Sell device at or below cost, make sure it only works with your highly, or moderately over priced (ink cart, eBook, razor blade refill, coffee pod, or whatever)!! I this case, I own an espresso machine and can hit the brew button for a second double shot of water for cafe Americano in about the same time as a K-Cup machine! For every day I'll stick to French press and grind my own beans, I own a pump pot carafe, so good to go for the whole day!!

  36. Just in time by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Glad this news just came about; I just backed out of ordering a Keurig on this news (ie canceled the Amazon order).

    I'll save up a bit and get a real (oood) espresso maker now.

    Sure, the Keurig does something for speed and efficiency (when you need a cup, you NEED A CUP). But not at the cost of being locked into their packets: I want my locally roasted beans, thanks.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:Just in time by beanpoppa · · Score: 1

      You did read the part where they said the 'next' Keurig machine, right? It doesn't come out until the fall. No reason not to buy the patent-expired Keurig 1.0 machine that you were interested in up until this news broke.

  37. Environmentalists vs. Keurig by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

    It always makes me chuckle when one of my self-anointed "green" friends whips up a cup of Keurig and then chucks the plastic container in the trash.

    Pot meet...

    1. Re:Environmentalists vs. Keurig by timeOday · · Score: 1
      They are hugely wasteful for what they are, but it's a pointless criticism without quantifying it on some scale. I would guess variations in individual resource consumption are dominated by a few specific things, like how much you drive/fly and your heating/cooling bill. Such things could easily equate to a few thousand Keurig packets per month.

      And for the record, I mostly drink Taster's Choice instant coffee, and I think it's pretty good, too. So sue me.

    2. Re:Environmentalists vs. Keurig by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      In the scale of things, it's a pretty miniscule amount of plastic.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    3. Re:Environmentalists vs. Keurig by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      It always makes me chuckle when Keurig-haters points out how "hugely wasteful" tiny plastic pods are as they gulp down a Dunkin Donuts coffee from a giant polystyrene cup.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    4. Re:Environmentalists vs. Keurig by Dr.+Zim · · Score: 1

      It's a McDonald's Styrofoam cup for me, but I refill the same one for days on end.

      --
      (name withheld by request)
  38. I just submitted feedback to Keurig by erroneus · · Score: 1

    I would encourage everyone to to the same. They have a simple email submission page on their site and it has no capcha or anything annoying like that. Let them know we do not care for the practice of locking out competition.

  39. Pour-over or french press or moka. by jpellino · · Score: 2

    I've found only one suitable pre-made Keurig pod for me, Dark Magic Decaf.
    Meanwhile, I still have opposable thumbs and can operate a french press or a Chemex or a porcelain cone or a Bialetti.
    Choose your level of messiness (none horrible), but get much better coffee at at least half the price.
    Yes, it can take up to ten minutes to get it, but there's something to be said for not making everything in life about pushing one button.
    I can do them all with any heat source, from electric main to the trusty SnowPeak.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:Pour-over or french press or moka. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      Or just as good, a Chemex coffeemaker, which has been "rediscovered" by serious coffee fans in recent years. Best of all, with a little practice you can make coffee in a Chemex that is WAY better than any Keurig machine out there.

  40. Keurig Vue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this "Keurig 2.0" thing is actually the Keurig Vue, the only real difference is that the cups are "keyed" through physical distortions.

  41. Sheesh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a brief moment, I thought our culture couldn't get any dumber.

    Thank you for wrenching me back to reality, Slashdot.

  42. wow. Just wow. by bigdan69 · · Score: 2

    Jesus. My coffee needs neither "interactive reability" nor "game-changing functionality." All the interactive readability I need is, I pour clear water in, and it comes out dark, dark brown. My coffee pot's functionality is not a game that needs to be changed; I shovel some ground beans in, and press a button. My coffee needs to force my sleeping ass awake for the drive to work, not save the world, the whales, or the children. As if I needed another, this is one more reason why a Keurig will never clutter my countertop.

    1. Re:wow. Just wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just buy a motherfucking French Press, and if you really need it a grinder too, or buy some fucking foil sealed bags of coffee, and a glass jar, or just buy some motherfucking instant coffee.

      Jesus fucking christ , do you realy need a fucking machine to make you cup of coffee, how about a machine that wipes ass, ro just pay poor jews to wipe it for you. Mother fucking jesus christ, fucking machine to make a cup of coffee.

      You need to buy a teaspoon.

    2. Re:wow. Just wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, whoever you are, pressed wrong button - you got a reply below that was supposed to be separate.

    3. Re:wow. Just wow. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      Hear! Hear! I wish I could mod you up.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
  43. because? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you grow your own beans, too? Seems simpler

  44. cold brew coffee by dgp · · Score: 1

    Another option for small servings of coffee is switching to cold brew. Its far less bitter and much easier on your stomach. It keeps in the refrigerator so it can be poured in one cup servings. It takes a little more setup work.

  45. Open Source brewer that uses older K-Cups? by MasterOfGoingFaster · · Score: 1

    I've used Keurig coffee makers for a number of years. Frankly, it doesn't hold a cup to a french press, or several other methods. It it does make sense in an office where you want coffee-on-demand.

    Now that the patent has expired, I think it is time for an open source project to build a K-Brew coffee brewer that uses the old K-cups. Clones already exist from Mr. Coffee and Cuisinart. But since many of us have 3D printers, I wonder if anyone is interested in creating an open design?

    BTW - I use a 1.5L french press, and put the brewed coffee into a vacuum thermos. Stays hot all day and is much better than K-Cups. Cheaper, too.

    --
    Place nail here >+
  46. Re:This was posted to Reddit like 4 hours ago. by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

    That's a much smaller lag time than usual. 1 to 2 days is more typical.

  47. Open Comment to GMCR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey there, just thought I'd comment on your absurd statement.

    "Are you fucking stupid? Or just the product of stupid fucking?"

    The ONLY reason I even invested in a Keurig style maker was the *cheap* pods available.
    Getting rid of compatibility with these will lose you 99.9% of your market.

    Better get that ass-lube ready there bub, your shareholders will be standing in line to ass-rape you for such a fucking moronic idea.

  48. Keurig pretty lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Keurig is a pretty lame device. I haven't used one that actually brewed a decent cup of coffee, even the dark roast is weak. And least not compared with my Senseo.

    Keurig once again showing that the inferior machine wins and the only thing that counts is marketing.

    1. Re:Keurig pretty lame by plover · · Score: 1

      Keurig once again showing that the inferior machine wins and the only thing that counts is marketing.

      And every Keurig shareholder says "yay, we win!" The only thing that counts to the business owner is profit, and all you're doing is confirming that they've made very good choices so far.

      Of course, this will hit them in their long term profits, and four years from now as they're chasing their CEO out of town with chipped pods containing Keurig brand tar-and-feathers 2.0, they might finally understand the DRM lessons the rest of us already know. But until they actually learn this lesson, they'll continue to think they're geniuses.

      --
      John
  49. Been doing single-cup for years by sehlat · · Score: 1

    My wife and I have a Krups dual-carafe coffee maker with a setting switch for 4 cups. Set the switch, take some beans out of the sealed container for the pre-ground beans, place them in a small filter cone. Place cone in plastic holder, pour in water and wait briefly while the coffee brews. Add seasonings to taste and drink.

    It's a simple enough process that even a Green Mountain Coffee Roasters executive could do it unassisted.

    1. Re:Been doing single-cup for years by sehlat · · Score: 1

      Update: I entered [less than] 4 cups and the [left angle-bracket] character was deleted from the post. We've made single-cup morning coffee for a LONG time.

  50. they don't care by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    DRM doesn't have to be undefeatable. The point is simply that the number of people who have hacked machines which bypass the DRM is much smaller than the total installed base of machines.

    So this makes it hard to make a viable business model by selling 3rd party cups. Even if you and everyone you know can run un-DRMed cups, companies still can't viably make generic cups.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:they don't care by plover · · Score: 1

      There's a tremendous amount of competition out there, and while they're currently the most popular, K-cups are far from the only game in town. If you don't want to get screwed by Keurig, buy a Nespresso, or Tassimo, or buy an AeroPress and forget the damn pods altogether.

      Coffee companies that have tried technologies to lock-in their users (I'm thinking T-disc barcodes) have not taken over the market. Customers are in love with the broad variety of K-cup compatible coffees out there, not just the Keurig licensed brands. I expect Keurig will stumble hard on this one - New Coke hard.

      --
      John
    2. Re:they don't care by camperdave · · Score: 1

      No need. Keurig cannot simply leave the K1.0 market and create a K2.0 market. The installed base of brewers is too high. You can't go into a kitchen appliance store without tripping over third party K-cup brewers, and third party K-cup coffees line the supermarket shelves. Even Starbucks and Tim Hortons have their coffees available as K-cups. Keurig would be foolish to release a brewer that could not take K1.0 cups. It would be like a new third company trying to horn in on the single brew market.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  51. Do you nerds see what you hath wrought? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gosh-dag-nabit! Do you see what you 'smarter than everyone else' nerds have done?!! Oh, jeez...

    "The 'Cloud' (tm)!! Connect everything to 'The Cloud'!!! Zen ve vill haff all zee control!"

    You nerds screwed up the internet (monetize it!... use it to spy on everyone!!) Now I won't be able to just make a damn cup of joe without 20 different advertising companies knowing and reporting about it.

    Great job guys. Just frickin' great... :^(

    1. Re:Do you nerds see what you hath wrought? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Easy solution: don't buy a DRM-enabled, Internet-connected coffee machine.

  52. Single cup method.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grind the beans very fine (flour like). Put one large teaspoon of coffee in a cup and add boiling hot water. Stir and wait till cool enough to drink.

    Using this method you might expect to have a mouth full of grinds with every sip of coffee. But that doesnt happen. If the coffee has been ground fine enough it sinks to the bottom of the cup and forms a solid "mud".

    1. Re:Single cup method.... by wcrowe · · Score: 2

      That's how the Greeks do it. I think the Turks too.

      I also think they argue a lot over who came up with the idea first.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    2. Re:Single cup method.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "one large teaspoon"

      Isn't that usually referred to as a "tablespoon"?

    3. Re:Single cup method.... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Sounds a lot like drinking 'Turkish' style coffee. I had a lot of this style of coffee in Indonesia as an exchange student many (many) years ago. You go used to stopping just before the grounds, leaving a residual sludge in the bottom of the cup.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    4. Re:Single cup method.... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      My brother has been making coffee by the pot in this way for years.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  53. Should be banned by cliffjumper222 · · Score: 1

    All plastic pod coffee systems should be banned or at least CRV charged on every single pod or equivalent. The only "pods" I've seen that come close to being eco-friendly are the commercial Flavia ones that are just foil in a UFO shape. Plastic creamer pods should be banned too! Those stupid bits of plastic stick around for thousands of years. If you want a quick cuppa, boil a kettle and drink tea or a decent instant coffee.

    1. Re:Should be banned by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Plastic creamer pods should be banned too! Those stupid bits of plastic stick around for thousands of years.

      I agree about the long-term disposal issue. But how do you propose producing hermetically sealed milk products in individual serving sizes without plastic?

      Coffee pods you could get away with the biodegradable plastic, I would think. But those creamer pods are hermetically sealed because of milk's otherwise incredibly short shelf life.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    2. Re:Should be banned by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      I agree about the long-term disposal issue. But how do you propose producing hermetically sealed milk products in individual serving sizes without plastic?

      I propose that you switch to black coffee, you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:Should be banned by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Also, cars should be banned, it's a waste of gas!
      Also, Amazon should be banned, everything gets shipped in plastic and cardboard!
      Also, TV dinners should be banned- you just end up throwing away the tray!
      Also, milk should be banned, every year people throw away millions of cartons!

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    4. Re:Should be banned by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      ...creamer....milk's....

      Get some real half and half. Not the ultra pasteurized goop. Better, make better coffee and drink it black.

      Milk products _shouldn't_ keep for weeks at room temperature.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:Should be banned by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      We throw entire naval vessels away but you're concerned with tiny plastic cups?

      What percentage of non-recycled plastic do you think consists of coffee pods (and even throw in the creamer cups for good measure). Is it even 0.01%? Do you honestly think that a fraction of a gram of plastic per cup of coffee is more wasteful than a giant polystyrene cup? Where's the false outrage over Dunkin Donuts or virtually any other establishment that sells drip coffee?

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
  54. Meh by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    I've tried Kuerig and I'm not impressed. Considering the cost of the pods, and the poor quality of the result, I'm not missing much. I've gotten to where I drink instant much of the time (and before you bash instant, there are some pretty good instants out there today, and it is also the way most of the world gets their coffee). If I want something better and I have the time, I use a french press. I have instant hot water at home (a device that is not much more than a Keurig, and infinitely more usable) as well as the office, so these options are not a problem. Either coffee method is at least as good as Keurig, cheaper and greener.

    Go ahead, Keurig, shoot yourselves in the foot. Good luck with that.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Senseo FTW.

    2. Re:Meh by norite · · Score: 1

      I paid a visit to a coffee cooperative in nicaragua (other half was doing phd research on the coffee industry); we had a tour round inside the sorting facility and they were showing us all the beans, graded according to type: organic, non-organic, best quality, lower quality, etc.

      Then there was a little wall made up of sacks of beans, sitting outside in the hot Nicaraguan sun, they hadn't been washed through thoroughly, so a little of the fruit was still on the beans and it absolutely stank because the pulp was slowly rotting. When I asked the guide what those were doingthere, sitting outside, he replied "Oh, those are the really, really low quality beans that we can't sell. It gets used to make instant coffee."

      So you may want to have a rethink about drinking instant coffee ;)

      --
      -- Fuck Beta
    3. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Instant coffee": you're using it wrong. Unless you'd call all Starbucks/Gevalia/Caribou/Camerons/et al.. "instant coffee"? There is huge difference between brewed coffee, which the Keurig does do, and stir-into-hot-water "instant coffee". Add to the fact, that you can use any kind of coffee in a Keurig, and well, you look like a dick-nosed liar.

    4. Re:Meh by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      The name-calling is completely uncalled for. I was only stating my opinion. About coffee, no less. I doubt if you would have called me a "dick-nosed liar" if you had been within arm's reach. Contact me if you would like to try it face to face.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
  55. This is how you're supposed to make iced coffee by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

    I tend to make a whole jug of it in Summer. Can take the first draft after a few hours, top up, another draft after 6 hours, top up, another draft after 6 hours, don't top up and drink the rest after another 6. Of course, sleep usually intervenes.

    Make is strong and add lots of milk & sweetener.

  56. K-cup coffee is $40(ish) a pound in Canada by MyNicknameSucks · · Score: 1

    You can drive the price down with bulk buying and so forth, but you're paying a rather hefty premium for mediocre coffee that would otherwise retail for about $10 a pound.

    I worked it out one time and our fancy-schmancy Jura that does about 4 cups a day has proven to be more economical than a Keurig, mostly because it can make a good cuppa out of $10 beans. Yeah, it took nearly two years, but we've had it for four. At this point, we can splurge on Blue Mountain beans and still be ahead of where we'd be with a Keurig or Nespresso.

    For those who don't know, all in one espresso machines operate on the basic principal of "water container on one side of the machine, beans on the other, finished coffee out the middle, grounds dumped into a small container that takes about a minute to clean out once a week." In general, they make very good, but not mind-blowingly great, coffee. But ... in terms of overall convenience? Yowza, we're in tough to beat territory. Plus I don't have to drive to the supermarket to recycle the pods. And I can use any beans I want while supporting local roasteries.

    And yes, I know, a French press would be OMG cheaper and (possibly) make better coffee. But after 15 years of arguing over who makes the coffee, my wife and I figured that a mostly automated coffee maker would be cheaper counseling.

    1. Re:K-cup coffee is $40(ish) a pound in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, you could have just about use ANY other type of coffee in the keurig (like it was made to), but spreading FUD is so much more satisfying, right? Fucking doof.

  57. HP anyone? by Discopete · · Score: 1

    Didn't HP try this BS with inkjet carts and have the courts slap them down? What's the difference here?

    1. Re:HP anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe, but video game consoles have been doing it forever, so nobody cares.

  58. They already tried and the answer was no by MrBippers · · Score: 2

    When the K-cup patent expired Keurig tried to promote their "Vue" cups, some of which actually carried RFID chips that interacted with the brewer. Vue cups were bigger, didn't fit in the K-cup style brewer, and cost around twice as much as K-cups. You could get an adapter to use K-cups in a Vue brewer, which was great when those machines were cleared out super cheap because no one bought them.

  59. Stupid.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Manufacturers continually screw themselves over thinking their customers are stupid. You can already buy k-cup pods in any drug/dollar store that you can put any ground coffee into and it's a sure bet some Chinese manufacturer will duplicate the current k-cup tech if Keurig does something stupid like DRM. We don't keep enough k-cups around to make switching over to something else that much of a problem, so they'd just lose another customer here....

  60. Fuuuuuuuuuuck You! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuuuuuuuuuuck You!

  61. OR... by operagost · · Score: 1

    Maybe we'll just stop using your coffee maker.

    The free market's a bitch. Enjoy your bankruptcy.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  62. Get a good machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a machine that grinds the beans every time. â300. Simple saeco nothing special. This was 3 years ago.

    It has since made over 3000 shots of espresso. 2-4 per day with peaks of many more. I drink 4 shots every morning on the commute to work.

    That works out to â0.10 per shot ex beans and going strong. With beans... Probably 0.25

    Seriously, if you drink coffee get machine with grinder.

  63. In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coffee lovers everywhere were overjoyed to learn that GMCR's CEO has confirmed that he's trying to kill the Keurig just as hard as he can.

  64. I agree with the CEO by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    'The much-anticipated ‘Keurig 2.0’ single-cup brewing system with ‘interactive readability’ (that doesn’t work with unlicensed/copycat pods) will offer such “game-changing functionality” that consumers - and unlicensed players - will want to switch.'"

    I predict the CEO is correct, but may be misunderstanding the direction of the switch.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  65. Easy clean, cheap solution by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

    Firstly, so many people drink shit coffee that how you make it is irrelevant.

    Secondly, if you have half-decent coffee but put milk & sweetener in, paying double for the coffee won't help.
    There's nothing wrong with putting milk & sweetener in, just like there's nothing wrong with eating milk chocolate.

    If you drink it neat, then yes, feel free to spend a fortune on the beans, hand grind them and use an Aeropress.

    Otherwise, here's what I do:

    1. Scour supermarkets for decent pre-ground own-brand coffee. Why? Because it will always be cheap and available. If you're in the UK, I can recommend Sainsbury's TtD Columbian Quichia.
    2. Buy hot chocolate (or make your own using cocoa powder and sweetener) if you like the sprinkles.
    3. Buy decent milk (of the big 4 UK supermarkets, Tesco's organic is the best, surprisingly).
    4. Buy a cup-sized steel sieve from eBay.
    5. Buy a milk-whisk from eBay.

    Serving:
    6. Microwave about 75ml of milk for 45s.
    7. Put sweetener in the bottom. In my opinion, Nutrasweet and clones are better than even sucrose -- the bitterness improves the coffee.
    8. Put a couple of teaspoons of coffee in the sieve and poor boiling water over it.
    9. Whisk the milk.
    10. Pour in and add chocolate sprinkles.

    The sieve doesn't need cleaning. You don't even need to empty the coffee out except after a couple of days or when it's too full. Literally tap against the side of the bin and you're done. No cleaning, no clogging up the sink, no blowing $hundreds on coffee and generating a ton of plastic waste.

    My coffee beats the shit out of Starbucks et al. Indeed, unless you drink coffee neat, it beats all the local independent cafes bar who charge 15x more.

    1. Re:Easy clean, cheap solution by TranquilVoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Firstly, so many people drink shit coffee that how you make it is irrelevant

      Yep, I'm cringing reading through this discussion of Americans debating which coffee is best.

      What's next, Canadians arguing over whether the most offensive word is "damn" or "bum"?

      Karma-burning out of the way, what you describe sounds like it would be very mild coffee, poured quickly over the grounds rather than steeped? Typically coffee snobs go for Italian espresso which is far stronger. The principles are;

      1. Beans must be fresh. One week after roasting is the optimal time (the beans de-gas), and they should be ground on demand. Supermarket beans are often sitting there for months.
      2. The grinder is more important than the machine. You want a very consistent grind that doesn't raise the heat of the beans. So saying I've A/B-ed an expensive burr grinder with a cheap one and couldn't notice the difference in the end cup.

      Another interesting style is Toddy's cold-brewed. You simply place a lot of grounds in a large plunger, fill it with cold water and leave it in the fridge for 12 hours. Plunge and pour into another container, keeping the coffee in the fridge (stays fresh for a week) to use as a base. Pour some into your cup, heat in the microwave and add milk and sugar as desired. Because it was extracted with cold water the taste is incredibly smooth with very little bitterness.

    2. Re:Easy clean, cheap solution by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      what you describe sounds like it would be very mild coffee, poured quickly over the grounds rather than steeped?

      I would say potentially, but it is easily compensated for by using a darker roast such as the one I recommended and more of it. It is notable that if I use the same grounds a second time, that's a piss-weak coffee with negligible caffeine content. Normally, I just add new grounds on top.

      More of a perfectionist complaint is that espresso machines produce a deeper, bitter-sweet coffee. This is not true of french press, percolator or dripfeed filter. It is why I prefaced my suggestions with 'if you use milk & sweetener'.

      It seems a reasonable proposition that the pressure produced by an espresso machine is somewhat equivalent to a darker roasting. The former may be preferable, particularly if you drink it neat.

    3. Re:Easy clean, cheap solution by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yep, I'm cringing reading through this discussion of Americans debating which coffee is best.

      You act like Americans don't know how to do things best. Sadly, the problem is, we also know how to do things worst. But look at our ass-kicking record, and you will see that it is astounding. It's just not as awe-inspiring as our record of doing amazingly ridiculous shit. Still, our wines are the best in the world, our cheeses are kicking ass these days, best beers in the world... Look at all these fatasses, like myself. We know something about food, even if some of us would willingly follow a recipe including velveeta.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Easy clean, cheap solution by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Typically coffee snobs go for Italian espresso which is far stronger.

      It depends on if they want espresso. There are lots of coffee-snob-approved ways of making coffee that result in dramatically different flavors. Sometimes you want a less-concentrated form of coffee. Just not one that tastes like crap, as automatic drip does.

      Off the top of my head, Aeropress, French press, Chemex, single-cup pourover, and cold brewing all make excellent cups of coffee.

      Just because most Americans drink automatic drip, that Keurig nonsense, or crappy Starbucks candied beverages doesn't mean that there aren't lots of us who actually know how to make good coffee. I've been to Italy; I had a lot of espresso. I'm pretty sure Italians are just drinking slightly less shitty coffee in a different style.

    5. Re:Easy clean, cheap solution by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Serving:
      6. Microwave about 75ml of milk for 45s.
      7. Put sweetener in the bottom. In my opinion, Nutrasweet and clones are better than even sucrose -- the bitterness improves the coffee.
      8. Put a couple of teaspoons of coffee in the sieve and poor boiling water over it.
      9. Whisk the milk.
      10. Pour in and add chocolate sprinkles.

      The sieve doesn't need cleaning. You don't even need to empty the coffee out except after a couple of days or when it's too full. Literally tap against the side of the bin and you're done. No cleaning, no clogging up the sink, no blowing $hundreds on coffee and generating a ton of plastic waste.

      My coffee beats the shit out of Starbucks et al. Indeed, unless you drink coffee neat, it beats all the local independent cafes bar who charge 15x more.

      Yes, you can make better coffee yourself, there's never been the argument. The thing is, a Keurig, and other systems, make it effectively a three step problem - turn it on, insert pod, push button and coffee comes out.

      Sure it's crap, that's not the point. The point is that it's easy, fast, and can be done while you're still trying to open your eyelids.

      It's why drip coffeemakers are standard for decades - they're relatively simple to operate (not as easy as a Keurig, but for making bulk quantities, they're easy).

      And that's the key issue - there are tons of ways to make great coffee. The problem is if you just want a shot of caffeine in the morning, even a shit cup would do to wake you up. Maybe enough so you can prepare a real cup of coffee.

      It's why Starbucks is popular - they handle allt he complex making steps for you in an industrialized fashion.

      What you need to do is make it so your method can be reduced to a single button press and it does everything. Of course, the compromises needed to make it suitable for mass-production and cheap enough for home purchase would compromise it as well.

    6. Re:Easy clean, cheap solution by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      A fair point, my friend.

      It is possible to:
      a) pour water everywhere but the cup
      b) overfill the cup
      c) put the wrong amount of coffee in ... under my method.

      If you're not up to it, who am I to judge.

      Re: Starbucks, I think it's more about cognitive simplicity than mechanical simplicity . The less thought that has to go into something, the more successful it is. And perhaps emotional simplicity ie can't deal with the minor discomfort of going somewhere new.

    7. Re:Easy clean, cheap solution by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      I don't need you to tell me how fucking good my coffee is, okay? I'm the one who buys it. I know how good it is. When Bonnie goes shopping she buys shit! I buy the gourmet expensive stuff because when I drink it I want to taste it. But you know what's on my mind right now? It ain't the coffee in my kitchen...

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    8. Re:Easy clean, cheap solution by bearvarine · · Score: 1

      Sadly, Green Mountain used to sell its coffee in bags like everyone else -- and it was pretty good too. Now it seems they are more interested in selling razors than razor blades. Perhaps we will buy our Keurig Cups from China, along with our fake printer cartridges that have to have fake chips in them to work properly...

    9. Re: Easy clean, cheap solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "do I have a sign outside that says dead nigger storage"

      haha classic pulp fiction

  66. K-cup is open now. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Their K-cup patent has expired. They might pipe dream about migrating all their users to more expensive DRM protected coffee machines. But it will die like Vista. And it will give the generic K-cup makers, who have just 8% of the market now, a new lease on life. Eventually like Microsoft they will tuck their tail between their legs and come out and compete in a level playing field. But these top honchos who dream up these things will do a few power point presentations, do some hustle to make bonus, cash out the stock options and will go out looking greener mountain to roast something other their share holders. Dump the stock now if you own it.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:K-cup is open now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they bring out the Vue cup machine which is already to the point where it is outselling K-cup machines (hipsters love the new features such as the two part Vue cup drinks), and re-locks people into their system due to the patents.

  67. Jura Capresso S9 by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    I love my Jura Capresso... I put beans in, and get awesome coffee out. Making expensive freeze-dried instant coffee will never compare.

    1. Re:Jura Capresso S9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can use any type of ground coffee in a keurig. where is all this fud coming from?

  68. I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who will be the first to make a pirated cup of coffee?

  69. Switch? by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it'll convince people to switch alright... to switch the the clone version of the coffee maker so they can continue to use their favorite coffee pods. You can argue about the quality all day, but the fact is... being able to get a cup of coffee in the morning without all the fuss of making more than you need, or having to clean everything up is worth something.

    1. Re:Switch? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's going to be much easier to retrieve up all those billions of little plastic cups in dumps in a few decades. But at least you don't have the hassle of cleaning up anything when you want to drink a cup of your legal stimulant.

  70. Crummy Joe by jdawgnoonan · · Score: 1

    The coffee isn't good, the amount of plastic waste is ridiculous, and each cup of coffee is expensive! Laziness is the only reason I could justify a Keurig, but then again I am a coffee snob who grinds craft roasted bean from a local roaster every morning. It is kind of sad that someone like me thinks it is too expensive, but I feel more justified that I spent 300 on my bur grinder than I would feel to buy one of their machines.

  71. Anyone for chess? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    So the only way to win is not to play? Nah, that's ridiculous.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  72. One-time-use RFID tags by tepples · · Score: 1

    That won't work if the machine deactivates the RFID tag during brewing so that the user doesn't brew from the same K-Cup2 pack twice.

  73. The comments here are just awful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a keurig mini for a quick kick in the arse before work. And anyone that says stupid shit like "grind it and press it blah blah blah" go back to starbucks and type on your mac. Snobs are the worst.

  74. Fmr Nestle employee patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fairly sure that a former Nestle employee saw this in his future and patented it specifically so DRM coffee couldn't happen.

  75. Compare the video game market by tepples · · Score: 1

    Consumers put up with the reduced and more expensive choice of video games on Nintendo consoles, as opposed to the 8-bit home computers that preceded them (C64 and friends) which were open to all developers. Both Atari and Nintendo put lockout measures into their third-generation consoles: Atari with RSA signed games that the BIOS verifies and Nintendo with a PRNG MCU in the Game Pak that communicates with a matching MCU in the console.

  76. One-time by tepples · · Score: 1

    Basically anything that they can reasonably do with the cup I could tear off and put on another cup

    But you might still have to buy one authentic cup for each homemade cup you want to brew. Otherwise, watch for an error message "You already brewed from this pack."

  77. K Cup Refillables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well mostly my wife uses a K-Cup "basket" to use coffee she has ground a bit finer for the machine sounds like this won't be available either.
    Yeah looks like competitors who don't do this may get a sales boost (at least for a while until they follow suit).

  78. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It still makes shitty coffee. I literally wouldn't drink it, if it wasn't free (for me) at my work. How about making better coffee instead of better pots? Or putting pot in your coffee? ;-)

  79. My K-Cup by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

    I wonder how this will effect their "my k-cup" that allows brewing any kind of ground coffee in a washable/reusable container. If they don't get rid of that, which would wholly lock in customers, then surely other vendors would just make cups that fit in that thing.

    --
    ...
  80. Sounds more like vendor lockout to me by subanark · · Score: 1

    This seems exactly what happens now with consoles. Your device will only interface with other hardware if that hardware provide a copyrighted code. If another manufacturer sells a device to use that code, then they get sued for copyright infringement. It will be interesting to see if they can come up with a system that cannot be modified by other companies to be reusable.

  81. What is he.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smoking crack??

  82. whole bean pods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe the DRM will be whole beans?

  83. Re:Keuring coffee? No thanks. by dpiven · · Score: 1

    Do you take it rich black or process black?

  84. I have the need, the need for speed. by redkcir · · Score: 1

    I like my Keurig. As the only coffee drinker in the house one cup at at a time fits me fine. But you can use any kind of ground coffee in it if you get some of those fill yourself pods. They are cheap and you can use your specialty coffees in them. If the Keurig folks shoot themselves in the foot with DRM I'm sure some one will come out with one without it. Or a hacker will build a home model.

  85. Can't we just agree... by Cantankerous+Cur · · Score: 1

    that morons will continue to spent lots of money on overpriced poor quality coffee and that the rest of us will find some considerably cheaper alternative?

    Incidentally, I love how my tea comes in cheap ($.05/use) bags with no cleanup.

  86. Keurig sucks by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    I tried their machine once. But it invariably produced a concoction that was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike coffee.

  87. Re:Keuring coffee? No thanks. by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

    Damn, someone's going to have to update the graph.

  88. It's still hot water and PLASTIC! Convenience at by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the cost of long term exceptional health.

    Do yourselves a favor people, skip the plastic in your coffee.

  89. Jailbrake Keurig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will be selling my Jailbroke Keurig to the highest bidder!

  90. Garbage by norite · · Score: 1

    Get a proper home espresso machine and make proper coffee instead, from whatever suppliers you are free to use....this is a truimph of marketing over genuine quality. However these machines will get hacked allowing folks to drink their ersatz hot beverages as before.

    I guess the CEO hasn't learned the painful lessons the music industry learned about using Digitally Restricted Media. Ho hum.

    --
    -- Fuck Beta
  91. Keurig? Or Couric? They both sound shitty to me! by Chas · · Score: 1

    I'm not a coffee drinker. Can't stand the stuff.

    But every time I see or hear Keurig, I get South Park flashes.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  92. Petition by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

    Thought I'd give it a go.

    --
    ...
  93. The market got us to the problem we face. by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    Letting the market handle things led to the situation we now face with DRM preventing people from making choices (highlighting how freedom of choice is so often a scam). This isn't the first instance of DRM providing no benefit to the user (eBook DRM leads to publishers and distributors taking away legally obtained copies of DRM'd eBooks like Amazon.com did in 2012 or making it possible to electronically enforce restrictions one could never get away with in paper books should the DRM proprietor so choose). The issue is not whether a proprietor has or hasn't used DRM to accomplish such a thing, the issue is that DRM grants someone or some organization the power to enforce restrictions like these, restrictions that should not exist. DefectiveByDesign.org doesn't seem to have problems coming up with plenty of other examples of how customers lose with DRM. DRM examples show us that word does not "get around pretty quickly" nor do monopolies "die a miserable death". Today there are people defending the idea of making it easier to get DRM into HTML5 instead of rejecting it out of hand based on principled opposition and experience. If things were as bad as you claim no business would bother with DRM, DRM would be rejected out of hand.

    I think this situation is much better understood by looking at this in terms of a minimum acceptable interoperability; something akin to environmental law (recognizing one can't negotiate everything they need on their own so we need to work together to set acceptable standards that let us get what we need) instead of a transactional basis (one-on-one interactions where each user is on their own to negotiate a better arrangement where it's likely no one user can muster the resources to effectively challenge the proprietor). Owner's rights should enter here as well: one should be able to use whatever they want with their Keurig device including less expensive beverage pods than what Keurig sells.

    1. Re:The market got us to the problem we face. by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      " restrictions that should not exist"

      restrictions that should not exist because you do not like them?

      Let another maker of coffee machines market themself as "universal" and the GMCR machine as 'outrageous'. Nobody is forcing you to buy either. You will live another day without a single serve automated coffee making machine. If GMCR succeeds, welll good for them. If they fail, good for the other guys.

    2. Re:The market got us to the problem we face. by jbn-o · · Score: 1

      Because DRM denies Keurig owners their ability to use their devices freely. I certainly agree that buying a Keurig sends the wrong message, and we should not do this, but we can take an active role in not buying DRM'd devices and services including this coffee maker. This coffee maker is a nice entry to understanding the value of freedom; not necessary for coffee but also a teaching opportunity. History tells us that we are better off to fight for freedom for what we have and need than to idly hope that someone else will improve one's lot and eventually respect our freedoms. Ethical evaluations can't be understood as personal preferences as you're trying to do here. As has been pointed out on /. before, "arguments are always based on values" and your values and mine do not agree.

    3. Re:The market got us to the problem we face. by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      Dude I want to drive my car 100 mph on the highway but the governments deny me the right to use my car freely. You have no inherent "right" to use a product in any way other than that intended by the manufacturer. If you can, well happy days for you. If you (or others) don't like that a certain product is "closed" then get off your ass, get funding and make an alternative and stop whining about it. It is not the fault of the company if they say "uses xyz replacement parts" and you fail to check to see if you can use "abc replacement parts" instead. That is down to your bad buying decision.

  94. Eff it..I'm Getting a Bag of Beans and a Pet Civet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw you Keurig.

    I'll train my DRM-busting civet to crap exactly one cup's worth of softened beans right into my grinder and use a French press.

    WIN.

  95. Adapt or Die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems they chose the latter.

  96. In Europe, they'd just make sure to have patents.. by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

    In Europe, they'd just make sure to have patents on some part of the cartridges - same as Samsung's approach on their printer cartridges;
    http://www.therecycler.com/pos...

    http://tonernews.com/forums/to...

    ( I don't think we have Keurig coffee makers here in NL unless you import them - I think the most popular ones are the Senseo and the Nespresso, both of which have plenty of third party cups/pads so at least they're not trying to lock that down very much. )

  97. Printer Ink by Rainwulf · · Score: 1

    Anyone see the parallel with the ink cartridge business?
    See how THAT worked out.
    People just started to buy printers that didnt need "manufacturer" ink, or just get "chip resetters"

  98. Re:Keurig? Or Couric? They both sound shitty to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not a coffee drinker. Can't stand the stuff.

    But every time I see or hear Keurig, I get South Park flashes.

    Well to be honest you're not supposed to drink liters and liters of it.
    American coffee has very little resemblance to real coffee, it is more like brown diluted piss.
    One little cup of espresso is all that is necessary to keep you awake each day. No more.

  99. HA! I am holding on to my Keurig until it breaks! by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

    They can 2.oh this all they want. I am holding on to my Keurig B70 until the thing dies. Which, given Keurig's awful reliability, has probably already happened in 7 out of 12 universes. But for now it still works!

    And when it dies, it goes back to Costco for a new one. HA! Take that Keurig!

    PS: Keurig coffee is not THAT good. It's merely convenient. The company often mistakes these for being the same thing. They are not. When they DRM it all to hell and make it less convenient, it will become another -nt word and that word is irrelevant.

    --
    Sig for hire.
  100. why would this sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (the comments on this are fantastic by the way!)
    i admit I am biased - I am a complete coffee geek/professional, and to me, K-cups are giant bras and pods are for alien hatchlings and whales only. Neither should be confused with coffee.
    So, Keurig make "quick/convenient" coffee - but only one cup at a time....
    Not only is grinding your own beans cheaper and less wasteful, it also produces nicer (fresher) coffee (ground coffee goes stale in under 5 mins - how long does it sit in those pods?? I know they're air tight but it's not a great system....)
    And now they are locking it down so you HAVE to buy their expensive branded pods....

    I wonder then, how on earth are they going to market this? why would anyone want to by the new Keurig 2.0 if they know that means being tied to one type of pods? if the old ones allow you to use refills or CostCo cheapy ones, what possible advantage is there of the new version?

    1. Re:why would this sell? by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      Ooooooooooh! Shiny!

  101. you have to use thin glass by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Thick glass will fracture when you pour boiling water in. The inside of the glass heats up and expands while the outside is still cool and that creates internal stresses and breaks it.

    By making the glass/ceramic thin the whole thing expands with the heat which causes no significant stresses.

    You could double-wall it or insulate it as others mentioned.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  102. Re:Attention, MODS! by Chysn · · Score: 4, Funny

    > It is spelled *expresso* not *espresso*. I am from Italy. I would know.

    The letter X isn't used in Italian. Seems like the kind of thing you would know.

    --
    --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
    -- See?
  103. Mod parent DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is actualy there is NO 'h' not 'x'

    1. Re: Mod parent DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. "Io ho" means "I have". Italian has an "h".

  104. What kind of idiot uses these things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just another worthless product destined for the landfill.

  105. Re: Attention, MODS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may have been born in Italy, but you need to brush up on your italian. There is no "x" in the proper italian alphabet. The correct spelling is "espresso".

  106. Secret game-changing functionality... obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Keurig machines will have a brewing counter that will disable the device after a set number of cycles or your license has expired (full-time internet connectivity is required to use the Keurig 2.0).

    This will be an improvement over the machine's current mode of obsolescence: leaking water onto the poorly protected internal electronics.

  107. cruel and unusual punishment by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    SCOTUS would never let that stand, no matter how appropriate a punishment.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  108. Re:Keuring coffee? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet the drivers have just as much DRM, though. Plus they're at least 50 MB for the simple driver that only prints or more than 200 MB for the do it all driver.

  109. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the matter with this thing? What's all this churning and bubbling? You call that a radar screen?
    No, sir, we call it, "Mr. Coffee". Care for some?
    Yes! I always have coffee when I watch radar, you know that.
    Of course, I do.
    Everybody knows that!
    Of course, we do, sir!

  110. Free man boobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm up a cup size in just 6 months. Way cheaper than plastic surgery and I'll be sporting a handsome rack by next years beach season!

  111. Re:Eff it..I'm Getting a Bag of Beans and a Pet Ci by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

    You'd still need to roast them.

  112. Didn't they already try this with the VUE? by flarb936 · · Score: 1

    I'm lazy and don't know how to actually make coffee. In fact, I didn't drink coffee regularly until the first Keurig came out. It's like 5X more expensive than brewing your own, but 100X more convenient.

    But they already tried to come out with a DRM'ed successor to the Keurig called VUE and it totally flopped. The coffee was more expensive, and the machine just had a bunch of useless options making it not much better than the regular Keurig with much cheaper K-Cups.

    --
    ralphbarbagallo.com
  113. We Need a Nuclear Coffee Pot by Pauldow · · Score: 1

    I used to work for a company that made nuclear power plants. One morning while waiting for the coffee pot, I calculated that if you took the secondary side steam (not the radioactive loop) our design would make enough hot water to make a cup of coffee for every person in the country each day.
    I didn't figure out the distribution issue though.

  114. K-Cup, ZIP, and Malkovich by enterix · · Score: 1

    Keurig forgets that it got popular exactly because 3rd party K-Cups are easily assessable. Going proprietary will work for them exactly how it worked for Iomega and their ZIP drives. If you really want classy cup of joe from single cup machine without the mess -- go Nespresso. That is like PC (Keuring) vs. Apple (Nespresso). First is drip style coffee, other is expresso style. And you have to see those European Nespresso commercials with Malkovich and Clooney!

  115. Breville YouBrew BDC600XL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Downside : a normal coffee brew process generates 6-12 cups of Joe.

    Brews between 1-6 (250 ml/8 oz) cups (or twelve 4 oz "cups", or tasse), with a built-in grinder so you get the freshest results:

    http://gizmodo.com/5946005/

    You can have either a carafe or a mug; it has a clock so you can have it start early and things are ready by the time you get to your kitchen in your morning routine.

    Not cheap, but it will probably pay for itself in a year given the cost of K-cups.

  116. replay log ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the device logs (in NVRAM), which coffee pods have been used

    sure glad there are a lot of non-DRM'd coffee makers out there

  117. Also don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Americans have no idea what coffee is, so the whole discussion is redundant.

  118. Game-changing functionality? by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 2

    It brews a cup of coffee. Exactly what functionality can they offer that changes that dramatically? The only thing I can think of is the ability to load several kinds of cups and have it programmatically select one. Remotely programming it... kind of pointless if I still have to walk down to get the mug, and if I've got the machine within reach to get the mug why do I need to program it remotely when I can just punch the Brew button? The only functionality I can think of they can add only benefits Keurig, and I'm not buying a brewer just for that.

    Warning, Keurig: I'm attached to coffee, not your particular brand of machine.

  119. One world government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *tinfoil hat on* :D

  120. Keureg - It Just Works! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does everyone here work for Apple?

    Good luck shaving tomorrow while looking your full-of-shit-selves in the eye.

  121. Keurig makes so-so coffee at best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keurig makes mediocre coffee at best. It is weak due to the way they run the water through the pods.

    The only thing I see going for it is that it is generally cleaner than the big carafes in the office kitchen which are NEVER cleaned properly.

    The only machine I have ever thought of purchasing is the Nespresso. The coffee is quite good though the pods are expensive. The benefits are that it is easy and quick to make a strong espresso drink.

    At home, I use a French press and am pretty happy with it. I also have an old-fashioned stove top espresso make that I love but don't use much any longer.

    Going to a proprietary pod for Keurig won't make a difference to me as I would never buy one to begin with. But it will surely hack off a lot of office managers and other customers.

  122. Only if you encounter the general case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of us only encounter the specific case which means the specific solution is more efficient. That said, if you DRM freaking coffee and make the overall process inconvenient then I'll find another solution.

  123. The Liteny by sjames · · Score: 1

    It is by will alone I set my mind in motion. By the juice of the bean the thoughts acquire speed, the shirt acquires a stain, the stain becomes a warning. It is by.....uh....urm....LICENSE.....EXPIRED.......

    LICENSE.....EX...PIR....ED...................GAAAAAAH! [WHUMP]

  124. Re: Attention, MODS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Italy that's somewhere out in Long Island?

  125. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My 12 year old $30 Mr. Coffee maker is going strong. The coffee sludge, mildew and bacteria that live in the water reservoir add a little "je ne sais quoi" to each cup. I use it every day. I cannot function without it, even for 30 minutes.

  126. Ink Jet Printers 2 by augahyde · · Score: 1

    Isn't this exactly what the ink jet printer manufacturers did so many years ago?

  127. Re: Attention, MODS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Italy that's somewhere out in Long Island?

    Or someplace equally irrelevant.

  128. Excellent way to screw themselves by Morpeth · · Score: 1

    I was given a Keurig as a gift -- even their strongest coffee is just ok and just passable imo. It's handy for when guests come over I guess (about the only time I use it), but personally I like my good old fashioned french press way more. This kind of crap will only make me use it less, and certainly never replace their machine.

    Given the cost of the machine, and that single serves k-cups run about .50-1.00, they're really not a good deal, especially compared to the buying/grinding your own and using a french press.. I can get surprisingly good whole bean coffee from Trader Joe's (organic and fair trade, a plus) for like ~$9 lb. I haven't done the math, but I get a shitload more coffee that way than from those pissy little cups, AND it's much better.

    You can get a mini basket filter to use in a keurig instead of a k-cup, but they're so small (and messy) that they don't make a strong enough cup for me.

    I also have guilt over how fucking wasteful those stupid k-cups are, for one little cup of joe. I even save the grinds from my press for the plants, they love it.

    I wouldn't even blink if Keurig went away, eff them.

    --

    'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
  129. Tassimo Did It by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    This has been done. Tassimo has barcodes on their 'pods' that tell the system how to brew that particular pod. It lets the system have greater variety, e.g. there are latte, cappuccino, cocoa pods.

    It was quickly reverse engineered on the internet.

    Moral: Unless this thing has a mandatory internet connection, it's not going to stop anything.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  130. I just want my coffee by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 1

    What do I care about the blinkenlights on the machine? Give me one button that gets me an espresso - freshly ground of course - and I am happy.
    I don't understand the appeal of all that capsule crap.

  131. Printer manufacturers tried this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Printer manufacturers tried this with their ink and toner cartridges. It got shot down pretty quickly with just a couple of lawsuits. Same thing will happen here. Restraint of trade or some such. Then they tried claiming that it was copyright infringement of their code when some of the cloners also cloned the embedded code in the official cartridges. Lawsuits found that it was just a method for stifling competition, so again, it got shot down.

    I don't see this going too far for Kuerig.

  132. In summary by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    A stupid, over-priced coffee maker, with silly, overpriced ingredients, makes itself even more useless...

  133. Why settle for a Keurig... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when you could have something designed by a spark.

  134. This will fly like a brick in the EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they never intend to sell this product in the EU as vertical monopolies is something the EU courts have been very dilligent about fighting (to Apple's chagrin).

    More marketshare for Nespresso, I guess. Lots of companies make pods compatible with their machines.

  135. Re^2:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Downside of Keurigs & Co. They don't even brew full cups unless you are happy with see-through coffee. I recently asked a female coworker if she ordered an espresso from the machine and the answer was: "No. That's the amount of normal coffee from one pod.". And our regular coffee machines going from 1-10 cups @ 125ml in europe. It is also pretty common to drink 2-3 cups before work (my parents did, I prefer tea). In the office the cups are sized @ 500ml which means you don't even need to worry that a full run gets cold.

  136. Is this legal in the EU? by ruir · · Score: 1

    Think is Nespresso tried to sue generic pod makers and lost, so there is already a precedent...

  137. Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chocolate is the only one worth drinking.

  138. Re:This was posted to Reddit like 4 hours ago. by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    I have been reading /. since August of 2001 and I honestly don't care at all that /. posted a story about this 4 hours after Reddit.

    I'm fine with 4 hours. I just don't care. If it was a story I cared about enough to check a few times...one that was on Reddit but not /. then after probably 4 hours to 2 days I'd submit my own story.

    I like for topics to get good discussion, and if the topic is relevant to stay on the main page for awhile. Bitcoin is a recent example. I could have used a "bitcoin open thread" or something because the news changed so fast it was hard to keep up with discussions in 8-12 hour old stories and keep up with new stories as they were posted.

    In general I just would rather /. not change than risk it getting worse (fuck beta)...I know that's the kind of thing old people say but I don't really care there aren't very many sites like /. left.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  139. Machines Showed Up In Office Break Room by JakFrost · · Score: 1

    These Keurig machines showed up in all of our break rooms at work all of a sudden without an announcement and no coffee pods. A few employees went out and bought their own pods of coffee and some bought the little tea filters also.

    Keurig must be doing a huge push-out across corporate offices to get these machines in so that they could make money on the retail side by having the employees buy the pods.

    Now version 2.0 has chipped pods. Sounds like HP and Epson and inkjet printer cartridges. The same old we'll make money on the consumable business models like razor blades.

    Glad that I don't drink coffee, it's an occasional tea for me and mostly just plain water.

  140. If you can't play fair... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't play fair, play dirty.

  141. Can't reuse the chip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I were the guy that invented this I'd make sure the same ID wouldn't be usable for more than one coffee.

  142. PC load coffee - what the f*ck doea that mean? by src1138 · · Score: 1

    Watch that stock graph trend down in a few months when they announce the actual solution. Anything they could do that would prevent workaround (via refils, spoofing, etc.) without adding prohibitive cost to the pods and/or impacting the user experience. Seriously - punishing people who buy their unremarkable coffee makers like this - if their business model (sell machine cheap and consumable materials dear) they can go suck it. It's not like he printer market where there are few alternatives - they have just found a way to make coffee makers as annoying as printers.

    I can imagine a scene from Office Space 2 where they take the coffee maker out back for some batting practice.

    If you really want to go to coffee heaven, start roasting your own beans. Takes 5-10 mins and makes a world of difference. Plus green beans cost a fraction of roasted.

  143. In other words, the Keurig 2.0 will be dead on arr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For the life of me, I can't begin to fathom what "game-changing functionality" would be in a f**king coffee maker.

  144. Boo to my Beloved Keurig by Chris+Dee+Dee · · Score: 1

    I love my Keurig, I own two of them, one for home and one for the office. This machine was designed for me and my coffee needs and uses. However, this whole idea of locking out "unlicensed" k-cups - it's just ridiculous. Over the past few years, the cost of k-cups has increased to the point where it's on the verge of becoming too expensive an option, what Green Mountain should be doing is finding ways to make the k-cups more affordable - they should be targeting the 40 cent range.

    1. Re:Boo to my Beloved Keurig by tatman · · Score: 1

      its all about money. For Green Mountain, they don't like other competitors using their technology without getting a piece of the pie. And for the consumer, it will be about money too. If Keurig 2.0 with its "DRM" is more expensive, then I doubt it will fly.

      --
      I've always said English was my second language. Had Romeo and Juliet been written in C, I might have understood it.
  145. refill cup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does that mean no more refillable cup like the ekobrew?
    if so then i'll stop using keurig!
    i will never buy any waste single-cup-to-trash coffee

  146. Hilaaaaaaaaarious . . . by Kimomaru · · Score: 1

    If this situation sounds familiar, it should - Nintendo kind of fought this battle with unlicensed game maker Tengen (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tengen_%28company%29) over 20 years ago. Now it's made its way to . . . a coffee machine? Dang. I just got a Keurig last week - makes great coffee :)

  147. Re:Attention, MODS! by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    It's spelled Expresso... Right on the side of my Dodge Neon

  148. Free breakroom coffee by boristdog · · Score: 1

    Nothing beats the free coffee in the breakroom.

  149. Aready tried, and failed, with the Tassimo system. by nbritton · · Score: 1

    This was already tried with the Tassimo, T Disc, system. Each T disc has a bar code on the label that controls brewing parameters. The new Keurig VUE system is the same, and will fail miserably, simply because it's not compatible with K-cups. What happened was the K-cup patents expired, so Keurig developed a new, patented, cup design. However, K-cups are now patent unencumbered, ubiquitous in the market, and very cheap to produce. With time, you'll see the price of K-cups come down drastically, in response to competition, and this action will cement K-cups as the de facto standard for single serving coffee.

    It will parallel that of Microsoft's Surface RT tablets. Think of K-cups as Windows/x86 programs, with the new system being a Windows/arm platform.

  150. What waste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use the refillable pod. I buy coffee in bulk and have no waste.

    1. Re:What waste? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I use the refillable pod. I buy coffee in bulk and have no waste.

      So I wonder about this. The next version will purportedly have DRM that will only allow the use of matching pods. If you're going to go to that kind of arrangement, what would be the point in having a refillable pod? If the intention is to require people to buy their coffee from the manufacturer, why would they let us use a refillable pod at all? We could fill it with anything, including a competing product.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  151. I see . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lots of posts saying that the Keurig is not economical or it creates waste (empty pods?). Am I the only person on the planet who actually bought it to use with the refillable cartridge? No waste, I buy coffee in bulk, etc. It's fast, cheap, AND reliable!

  152. Re:Attention, MODS! by geekoid · · Score: 1
    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  153. Hasn't anyone mentioned ESE Pods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both Lavazza and Illy, great italian coffee brands sell them, among other brands. They provide the convenience these other pods have, but use a standard so I can decide which type of coffee to use on my machine. Also, the espresso machines (available at all price ranges) can also use freshly grinded coffee if you have any. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easy_Serving_Espresso_Pod
    My cheap, but very usable espresso machine:
    http://www.amazon.com/DeLonghi-BAR32-Retro-Espresso-Cappuccino/dp/B0002A3S66/ref=tpi_image_0?ie=UTF8&pf_rd_i=297556&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_p=456787401&pf_rd_r=0Q7ZM8DY0XSGR76ZX3E5&pf_rd_s=center-6&pf_rd_t=101

  154. They're shooting themselves in the foot by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    Sure there are people that have no desire to be thrifty and will continue to buy k-cups from the supermarket until the end of time. I do not fit in that classification however. Once or twice a year I make a bulk purchase on Amazon and based on the pricing I am guessing the cups I buy are not "officially licensed". If I knew I couldn't get the cheap cups and had to buy the expensive k-cups all the time, there's zero chance I'd shell out for a keurig.

  155. Keurig's reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real reason for Keruig doing this is to reduce returns and warranty issues with their brewing machines (which are a large part of their sales and 99% of their warranty issues.)
    Most of the third-party vendors do not properly (if they include it at all) build the internal ground-filter in the k-cup and this results in coffee grounds clogging the intakes on the keruig brewers that use third-party cups.
    Keruig is on the hook for the warranty fix for this and are tired of losing money on it (and it will give them income by licensing their k-cup design to these third-party packagers.)
    So, it's not a nefarious conspiracy to extract more money out of you, it is a way to stem unsustainable losses (that also makes them more profit.)
    That is what businesses do.

  156. Thermos by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    I just bought a quality thermos (vacuum) that keeps my coffee hot for hours. I chose a size that fits my consumption.

    Brew in the morning, bring with, have hot coffee until lunch.

    Easy.

  157. Re:Why? Hell is other people by tempest69 · · Score: 1

    I've come in to work with some gross frickin coffee makers.
    Or finding the grinder lid is no where to be found on Monday morning.
    If you stash your next grinder you're considered some kind of pretentious schmuck. So you get some cheap POS grinder, just to find that the coffee filter is gone the next Monday. You grab some paper filters, and find that someone tried to brew stronger coffee by using five filters at once, making an ever loving mess of the coffee pot/kitchen area

    I like that it is really inconvenient for someone else to make the brewing part go nasty/break on a K cup system.
    Knowing that I just grab a pod and have fresh brewed caffeine in 20 seconds is comforting.

  158. Déjà vu? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    I think we've seen this before...

    And the machine will refuse to work with "refilled" cartridges or expired ones, due to the chip. Give it a few years, and there will be coffee shops that sell nothing but re-manufactured coffee pods. All with a guarantee that it's the same quality of coffee in the genuine pods and it won't clog your coffee maker. Keurig, of course, will refuse to honor the warranty on their machine if they believe you've been using refilled/remanufactured pods.

  159. What a pointless feature... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this will do is make K-Cups even more expensive than they are now and since Green Mountain already has many coffee makers in their grasp they will have no choice but to go along with this nonsense. Really? DRM for K-Cups? How about a giant FU to Green Mountain for even thinking that this is a valid idea.

  160. Coffee Makers Make It Difficult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got tired of all the hassle and started drinking instant coffee.
    Much easier and not too bad.

  161. hrm by Aryden · · Score: 1

    My coffee maker (12 cups) cost me $40. A large bag of ground coffee (dunkin donuts brand) costs me $14 (160 cups). 100 count of filters is about $2.00. So, .02(filter) + .08(coffee) = $.10 per cup of coffee. The filters are biodegradable as are the grounds as is the remaining undrunk coffee (rare). The keurig route would cost me far far far far more since it's about $7.99 for a 12 count of pods...... yeah losing money.

  162. Lock down? by vandamme · · Score: 1

    Has Keurig also gone to an embedded windows OS? Maybe it will have a touch screen with colored blocks.

    Can't imagine what functionality they will include, besides making coffee at high cost.

  163. Finishing Move by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    I'm just waiting for Apple to sue all of them for daring to use their word 'Pod'.

  164. consumers - and unlicensed players - will want to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly - to something else.

  165. Screw coffee by bkcallahan · · Score: 1

    Switch to tea and be civilised. Anyone for a bunch of DRM coffee going into the harbor?

  166. What a great strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This strategy works so well for ink cartridges and lightning cables. The counterfeit pods will be available before the brewer is.

  167. Keurig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think at this point people are so fed up with proprietary items that they will just forgo Keurig. For them to take this action seems petty and will cost them in the long run. After all, I think I read somewhere that the single serve pods end up costing around $50+/pound of coffee. Not such a good deal. Just to add, this "new" Slashdot website really is cumbersome.

  168. Better than Keurig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a Keurig brewer about five years ago, for $150.00. I also bought a Gaggia Platinum espresso coffee maker, from Aabree Coffee, about the same time, for about $1,300. Guess which one has stood the test of time? The Gaggia Platinum grinds the beans, makes the coffee or espresso and heats the milk, either on their milk island or through a steam tube, and I use Dunkin' Donuts beans. The payback was less than two years and I use the Gaggia nearly every morning and six-eight times on the weekends or holidays.

    GMCR needs to also look at the Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act and "Lexmark Int'l v. Static Control Components," USCA Sixth Circuit which (2004 and 2013) ruled that circumvention of the technique of interactive readability does not violate the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

    Steven Moshlak
    http://www.computerlegalexperts.com

  169. reusable cofee filtering by OurDailyFred · · Score: 1

    Cotton underpants can be used as coffee filters, and they're washable. If you use the underpants after you've worn them you're better off using the sides as the underpants will eventually develop large brown stains in the seat area. If you already have large brown stains in the seat area, you may want to avoid using that area anyway, as it will affect the taste of the coffee.

    Not only will you save on coffee filters, you will also save on laundry soap and realize that you're displaying your concern for the environment by proudly hanging your coffee stained underpants on your clothesline for the neighbors to envy.

    Hope that helps!

    --
    If your only tool is a hammer, you'll approach every problem as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
  170. Keurig - Uh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was never that interested in one of these to begin with, but now they want to restrict pods to just the ones they make and sell..... Nope, even if I was inclined, DRM implementation immediately has me rejecting it. Wasn't cost effective to start and that makes it worse, for mediocre coffee. There are all kinds of alternatives for a single cup or small quantity. My Cuisinart and Caphalon coffee makers both have a setting for 1-4 cups. But I also bring my own brewed coffee from home in a self contained coffee mug that keeps it hot for hours.
    This is a dumb idea that in the long run should bite them back hard.

  171. pod coffee is crap end of story really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who says they love coffee and drinks pod coffee has mothballs for brains...

    anyway isn't this anti competitive?

  172. A little coffee pot by CmdrTamale · · Score: 1

    I have one of those. It's great.

    The picture on the box it came in shows a half dozen of those coffee thimbles the Italians use. It just about fills up my pre-breakfast mug.

    It is kind of hard to hold the mug steady pouring the mid-breakfast brew.

    The first post-breakfast brew is hazardous.
    --
    Real programmers can PERFORM COBOL and DO FORTRAN.

  173. Re:Horrible coffee (XKCD) by Keybounce · · Score: 1

    How about we just skip to the end of the chain?

    Unless you created a pocket universe, started a creation event, formed stars from the resulting big bang cloud, fused a solar system worth of hydrogen into heavier matter, collected the matter into a planet in the perfect orbit, formed a primordial soup, created life from the soup, evolved the life to create coffee bean producers, harvested the beans, processed and roasted the beans, ground them, and finally pressed them yourself, then it's not proper coffee.

    I'll just train the butterflies, and let their wings do the work for me.

    Err, is that "obligatory XKCD"?
    http://xkcd.com/378/

  174. Re:In Europe, they'd just make sure to have patent by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    If they actually got sued I expect them either to lose or to be forced to license the patents for cheap. Those are patents on interfaces for crying out loud.

    Nespresso is probably the biggest in the EU yeah. You know how Nestle is.

  175. Re:In other words, the Keurig 2.0 will be dead on by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

    It could give you a bad attitude, just like a human barista.

    (Disclaimer: I'm not American, and I've never heard the word "Keurig" before today.)

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  176. Re:Attention, MODS! by Optali · · Score: 1

    No X in Italy?

    And how do you know when a flick is pr0n?

    --
    -- 29A the number of the Beast
  177. Time to Change Coffee Pod Machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a long time fan of the original Keurig machine and pods I guess it
    may be time to change brands. I'm not going to be locked into
    Green Mountain Coffee Roasters pods only. When this came to market years ago a box of 24 pods was like 8.99 now boxes of 18 are going for 12.99.

  178. Proprietary pods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the equivalent of everything I hate about apple.

    1. Re:Proprietary pods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the equivalent of everything I hate about apple.

  179. Agreed. All this fufu coffee brewing. Spend your m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mmorrissey

  180. No thank you. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    This is going to make me buy an Aerobie AeroPress plus 350 filters for under US$30 online instead.

  181. Open Source Coffee... by bluesfreak72 · · Score: 1

    Let's get Richard Stallman to fork the Keurig and release a coffee maker under the GPL!!!

  182. Whacked by the law again? by aurizon · · Score: 1

    These precedents would seem to say this.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T...

    more here on similars
    http://en.wikipedia.org/w/inde...

  183. Yes, I will switch--back to my French press. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, this does make me want to switch--back to my French press.

  184. After an earthquake... by voss · · Score: 1

    You dont find the starbucks...you find the waffle house. They already have a contingency plan and backup generators so they will have hot coffee ready to go. They are the only resturant I know that reports its operational status to FEMA.

  185. Not all of us have the time. We simply don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't a preference thing. Before my Keurig, I wouldn't have anything in the morning and I would be a zombie before late afternoon. My Keurig has saved the day. So, fuck you.

  186. K tastes like $h1+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Krupps automatic espresso machine which allows everything from normal coffee to espresso . It only takes a minute to grind the beans and make the coffee. It is fantastic.

    I also have a Keurig. Awful. No matter what "pod" you use they are all awful and awfully expensive. I honestly cannot fathom how this created such a sensation.