while i am not advocating self-diagnosis via the internet nor disagreeing with you, i think people turn to this because they tire of feeling "inferior" to a doctor (yes i know they have years of training and schooling but hear me out first). an example that comes to mind is a good friend of our family's elderly mother who started acting strange, then having definite tell-tale signs of a stroke. they took her to a hospital, they explained what was happening, how she started acting, what her symptoms were and thought she was having a stroke. the medical staff almost refused to believe them and had an "adults are talking" attitude. THREE HOURS go by, they come back and say yes she is having a stroke and put her on medication. i don't know the innerworkings of medical testing procedures, maybe it does take three hours to test for a stroke, but it seems they could have shaved a lot more time off if they had simply cared about what this family was saying.
damn you're STILL wrong. it would reply using the originating source port number. it would ONLY use UDP53 if you are hosting DNS (ie. someone making a request TO you), not only that but most firewalls (consumer-grade) out-of-the-box knows and allows traffic that merely responds to outbound requests.
take a look at your home router/firewall, linksys, netgear, d-link, multitech, i'm guessing that you probably don't have a specific entry for forwarding UDP53. that would mean that any INCOMING request on UDP53 would be discarded because the firewall would not know where it goes. the -149 pts still stands, sorry.
...but from what i hear the old ccna was little more than learning how to navigate the command line. i took the ccna last year through the cisco netacadamy and one of my final projects was simulating a wan using isdn, frame, ppp, and some vlans w/ vtp and some basic stp, not to mention setting up nat and dhcp routers. i had a really good instructor.
well you'd best not call on your gsm phone
and this is the thanks it gets?
...eats rocks and shits lightning bolts.
yes, outside a galaxy far, far away. probably a long time ago too.
can i see it?
i bet the RAMAC could bake a good noodle too. just set a dish on top and copy a few files.
while i am not advocating self-diagnosis via the internet nor disagreeing with you, i think people turn to this because they tire of feeling "inferior" to a doctor (yes i know they have years of training and schooling but hear me out first). an example that comes to mind is a good friend of our family's elderly mother who started acting strange, then having definite tell-tale signs of a stroke. they took her to a hospital, they explained what was happening, how she started acting, what her symptoms were and thought she was having a stroke. the medical staff almost refused to believe them and had an "adults are talking" attitude. THREE HOURS go by, they come back and say yes she is having a stroke and put her on medication. i don't know the innerworkings of medical testing procedures, maybe it does take three hours to test for a stroke, but it seems they could have shaved a lot more time off if they had simply cared about what this family was saying.
c'mon now, we all know there are no girls on the Internets.
damn you're STILL wrong. it would reply using the originating source port number. it would ONLY use UDP53 if you are hosting DNS (ie. someone making a request TO you), not only that but most firewalls (consumer-grade) out-of-the-box knows and allows traffic that merely responds to outbound requests. take a look at your home router/firewall, linksys, netgear, d-link, multitech, i'm guessing that you probably don't have a specific entry for forwarding UDP53. that would mean that any INCOMING request on UDP53 would be discarded because the firewall would not know where it goes. the -149 pts still stands, sorry.
no, it's raptor jesus. he went extinct for your sins.
...but from what i hear the old ccna was little more than learning how to navigate the command line. i took the ccna last year through the cisco netacadamy and one of my final projects was simulating a wan using isdn, frame, ppp, and some vlans w/ vtp and some basic stp, not to mention setting up nat and dhcp routers. i had a really good instructor.