Congratulations. You get an A+ for sophistry. They most certainly argue that their efforts aren't based in religion...because then they'd have to watch out about mixing church and state, and maybe getting their freeloading asses taxed.
Amazing how many of Right to Lifers are in favour of capital punishment, though.
And unless you can come up with some concrete proof that god even exists, insisting he made anything at all is simply ridiculous.
Congestion is caused by jackholes who believe a red light means it's OK to text until half way through the subsequent green, when the person behind finally runs out of patience and starts hammering on their horn.
A close second to these morons are Third World immigrants who buy gigantic SUV's because they know they're such horrible drivers they're going to kill somebody sooner or later, and believe a bigger vehicle will ensure they won't be the ones to pay the price for their incompetence.
I guess you're too stupid to know that vaccines don't become fully effective the minute they're administered. And I guess you're also too stupid to know infants aren't vaccinated at birth, but can still fall prey to the illnesses vaccinations prevent...which can be introduced into their environment in a number of ways.
It would be far better to just let them go unvaccinated...but keep the little disease vectors the fuck away from the children of real people. And charge the parents with murder if their spawn die of a disease that could have been prevented by vaccination.
The Right To Life types will go absolutely berserk over this. The whole religious underpinning of the movement...the one they never like to talk about...will have to decide whether a human created by man should enjoy the same protection as a human created by their god.
And when there's no sperm and egg union to enshrine as the moment when life begins, where will they draw the line? At what point during the assembly process does the thing in the dish deserve to be called human? A chimp shares all but 4% of our DNA, after all.
And that, in turn, goes back to the middle of the last century, when broadcasting corporations were sold the right to use the public airwaves for only a tiny fraction of the true cost. All they had to do was agree to provide a minimal level of public interest programming. That was news. Ever since, they've steadily monetized the news programs themselves, and studiously avoided savage coverage of things that might upset their advertisers.
I doubt there will ever be another Viet Nam, where broadcast news programs brought the war right into the living rooms of Nixon's "Silent Majority", and proved to them that the hippies, peaceniks and draft dodgers were actually telling the truth, while the government and its corporate owners weren't.
According to this, we should obviously ban trucks from city streets. How many cars would it take to equal the weight of an 18-wheel rolling warehouse loaded with plates, cutlery and mini-fridges for Walmart?
After enduring 30 years of ads where the guy is a whiny moron who gets all his problems fixed by the smart, beautiful woman who for some mysterious reason has decided to make him the father of her children, I have no difficulty with dispensing one on the other side:
Perhaps the study would have shown the same slight increase for women, if they had enough grey matter to be affected.
Slashdot Mirror
Sure they will. I bet it won't even take 10 years.
Great...does this mean I now get to quote from a more important book...like one of the Harry Potter volumes, or maybe "Letters From The Earth"?
Congratulations. You get an A+ for sophistry. They most certainly argue that their efforts aren't based in religion...because then they'd have to watch out about mixing church and state, and maybe getting their freeloading asses taxed.
Amazing how many of Right to Lifers are in favour of capital punishment, though.
And unless you can come up with some concrete proof that god even exists, insisting he made anything at all is simply ridiculous.
Well played, sir. Well played indeed!
If I was allowed to give mod points on a thread I posted in, I'd give one to you...more if I could get away with it.
...continues to call itself "News", Facebook can do pretty much whatever it likes. Doubters might want to take a look at this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkOKVw2TcBs
Best drug courier ever!
Congestion is caused by jackholes who believe a red light means it's OK to text until half way through the subsequent green, when the person behind finally runs out of patience and starts hammering on their horn.
A close second to these morons are Third World immigrants who buy gigantic SUV's because they know they're such horrible drivers they're going to kill somebody sooner or later, and believe a bigger vehicle will ensure they won't be the ones to pay the price for their incompetence.
Without more than your unsupported assertion, why would any sensible person accept these charges as facts?
I guess you're too stupid to know that vaccines don't become fully effective the minute they're administered. And I guess you're also too stupid to know infants aren't vaccinated at birth, but can still fall prey to the illnesses vaccinations prevent...which can be introduced into their environment in a number of ways.
And let's not forget the old folks and people with compromised immune systems they might kill.
It would be far better to just let them go unvaccinated...but keep the little disease vectors the fuck away from the children of real people. And charge the parents with murder if their spawn die of a disease that could have been prevented by vaccination.
So you'll believe an insurance company's spin on your situation before you'll believe a doctor?
Way to go, Sherlock.
The Right To Life types will go absolutely berserk over this. The whole religious underpinning of the movement...the one they never like to talk about...will have to decide whether a human created by man should enjoy the same protection as a human created by their god.
And when there's no sperm and egg union to enshrine as the moment when life begins, where will they draw the line? At what point during the assembly process does the thing in the dish deserve to be called human? A chimp shares all but 4% of our DNA, after all.
This should be fun!
I think I saw a pron once where some girl rode a Golgi Apparatus until she suffered what appeared to be a grand mal seizure.
Suck my cock, troll.
And that, in turn, goes back to the middle of the last century, when broadcasting corporations were sold the right to use the public airwaves for only a tiny fraction of the true cost. All they had to do was agree to provide a minimal level of public interest programming. That was news. Ever since, they've steadily monetized the news programs themselves, and studiously avoided savage coverage of things that might upset their advertisers.
I doubt there will ever be another Viet Nam, where broadcast news programs brought the war right into the living rooms of Nixon's "Silent Majority", and proved to them that the hippies, peaceniks and draft dodgers were actually telling the truth, while the government and its corporate owners weren't.
...as long as Fox uses the word "News".
Thanks. I meant that as a rhetorical question, but you gave me a really interesting answer to it.
Excellent point.
You're very welcome. And I'm glad to see I wasn't the only one here to mention them.
According to this, we should obviously ban trucks from city streets. How many cars would it take to equal the weight of an 18-wheel rolling warehouse loaded with plates, cutlery and mini-fridges for Walmart?
...Osama is high-fiving Satan under a "Mission Accomplished" banner.
Interesting. I wonder if usage patterns were different, too.
After enduring 30 years of ads where the guy is a whiny moron who gets all his problems fixed by the smart, beautiful woman who for some mysterious reason has decided to make him the father of her children, I have no difficulty with dispensing one on the other side:
Perhaps the study would have shown the same slight increase for women, if they had enough grey matter to be affected.
Yes, I've already taken cover. ;-)
I see from the headline that the World Video Game Hall of Fame now has an Inductess. I imagine next they'll be appointing a Seductee.