The fact that I commented on your job doesn't make me a homophobe. I merely mentioned the day-to-day realities of your employment with respect to leaks.
You seem to believe this is some kind of value judgment. Sadly, this says far more about how you view your job (probably in the rest room mirror) than about those of us remarking on the sad life of someone living in an environment where their sexuality is a source of guilt and self-loathing.
Please try not to take nasty remarks about your sexuality made by those you have just serviced too personally. It's the price of being a conservative, and you'll just have to (cough) suck it up (cough).;-)
I'll add my voice to yours on this. My long-time girlfriend sounds a lot like your lady...mostly, we enjoy the same kind of entertainment. However, she doesn't watch any sports at all, and I don't watch the "chick flicks" she enjoys. We're both fine with this situation.
Several of her girlfriends have either hinted or stated outright that I should be "encouraged" to watch female-oriented movies, usually "so I can understand her better", "so I can be more in touch with my emotions", "so I can appreciate a woman's perspective on the world", etc.
Name a simple-minded, Oprah-style pop-psych meme, and these women have bought into it. Meanwhile, my girlfriend and I have been together for years, while her friends could best be described as "serial monogamists". They're always on their way into or out of a relationship, never happy alone, and even less happy when they aren't trying to warp their current squeeze into some Harlequin Romance version of the perfect guy.
Why do I get the feeling Microsoft operatives are right this moment seeking ways to physically access these antediluvian media...and considering "next steps"?
"I was posting AC due to device convenience, and absoluely obviously not an attempt to conceal who was responding."
Yes, of course. A soi disant "professional software developer" with a "device inconvenience", not a religious fanatic with a penchant for deception. No doubt you're also a chemist...one who's never heard of the Periodic Table.
"Lie on about my dishonesty you've yet to cite a single example of.
See above. Who are you going to sign in as next time? Jesus? Mother Teresa?
In other words, you finally figured out that your attempt at an argument is stupid, illogical and dishonest.
Like you.
Thus, your attempt to label me a troll.
Nice try. And Bravo for replying as an AC, as though your manner of expression isn't recognizable. Like so many religious types, you remain your dedication to lies and deception right to the end.
And I've forgotten more about language than you'll ever know. What you attempt to define as "informal usage", rational people call "blatant inaccuracy for the purpose of misdirection".
For starters, it takes, on average, about 10 years for a person facing the death penalty to exhaust all their appeals. And those typically involve a lot of court time (which costs a lot of money). And keeping somebody on Death Row is more expensive than keeping them in the general prison population. Ec cetera.
Sorry, I really don't have time for a detailed response (truth, not bullshit), but I looked into this fairly deeply, and just about every reputable study on the subject came out the same. Nobody admits it, but there's far, far more bureaucracy involved in death penalty cases than those imposing multiple consecutive life sentences.
Whenever want to persuade an American to my point of view, I simply start a sentence with "America has the best (fill in anything) in the world". Then I watch as their tiny, propaganda-dulled brains shut down, and they nod solemnly. Then they mindlessly slurp up whatever I present as just a tiny bit of tinkering to make something great even better.
Do you speak English? Clearly you don't write it very well. No doubt this is part-and-parcel with your inability to understand science, mathematics or just about anything else having to do with rational thought.
Just for starters, you might want to review your understanding of the word "theory" as it applies to science. And poseur is a noun, not a verb, moron.
No, you have what you believe. I have what I can prove.
This is why so many religious people are worthy of nothing more than the pity of rational humans. Contempt and disgust are also options, when religious fanatics engage in the kind of dishonest nonsense that seems to be your meat and bread.
You think you'll be around then? LOL. The only hope of an afterlife is if we figure out how to do it ourselves...maybe by downloading our mind into some kind of computer.
And then, yet again, humans will have stuffed god into an even smaller box, and made believers look even more foolish.
I agree with you, but I think it will prove to be easier than you believe. They've already sequenced the genome of a lot of mammals, and that's a long first step.
Slashdot Mirror
The fact that I commented on your job doesn't make me a homophobe. I merely mentioned the day-to-day realities of your employment with respect to leaks.
You seem to believe this is some kind of value judgment. Sadly, this says far more about how you view your job (probably in the rest room mirror) than about those of us remarking on the sad life of someone living in an environment where their sexuality is a source of guilt and self-loathing.
Please try not to take nasty remarks about your sexuality made by those you have just serviced too personally. It's the price of being a conservative, and you'll just have to (cough) suck it up (cough). ;-)
I'll add my voice to yours on this. My long-time girlfriend sounds a lot like your lady...mostly, we enjoy the same kind of entertainment. However, she doesn't watch any sports at all, and I don't watch the "chick flicks" she enjoys. We're both fine with this situation.
Several of her girlfriends have either hinted or stated outright that I should be "encouraged" to watch female-oriented movies, usually "so I can understand her better", "so I can be more in touch with my emotions", "so I can appreciate a woman's perspective on the world", etc.
Name a simple-minded, Oprah-style pop-psych meme, and these women have bought into it. Meanwhile, my girlfriend and I have been together for years, while her friends could best be described as "serial monogamists". They're always on their way into or out of a relationship, never happy alone, and even less happy when they aren't trying to warp their current squeeze into some Harlequin Romance version of the perfect guy.
"I don't think I know any personally."
I also doubt you know any women personally.
Better her than Trump.
The only leakage around here is what ninety-year-old men leave in your mouth when you're at your day job in an RNC men's room.
Thanks for a true "Laugh Out Loud" moment.
Why do I get the feeling Microsoft operatives are right this moment seeking ways to physically access these antediluvian media...and considering "next steps"?
What if I told you you're intentionally missing the point...or perhaps just too stupid to understand it?
How about "reckless endangerment" or "depraved indifference to human life"?
Anybody wringing their hands over Clinton's stupidity while ignoring the situation mentioned above is a hypocrite, pure and simple.
Why do I suspect we have a similar sense of humour?
And while conservative fucktards all over the US get their panties in a knot over this nonsense, look what they ignore:
"US Military Uses 8-Inch Floppy Disks To Coordinate Nuclear Force Operations"
Well said!
Your failure to address your dishonesty speaks louder than any words.
"I was posting AC due to device convenience, and absoluely obviously not an attempt to conceal who was responding."
Yes, of course. A soi disant "professional software developer" with a "device inconvenience", not a religious fanatic with a penchant for deception. No doubt you're also a chemist...one who's never heard of the Periodic Table.
"Lie on about my dishonesty you've yet to cite a single example of.
See above. Who are you going to sign in as next time? Jesus? Mother Teresa?
What you really are is a joke.
In other words, you finally figured out that your attempt at an argument is stupid, illogical and dishonest.
Like you.
Thus, your attempt to label me a troll.
Nice try. And Bravo for replying as an AC, as though your manner of expression isn't recognizable. Like so many religious types, you remain your dedication to lies and deception right to the end.
Never mind pity. You have earned my disgust.
A "professional software developer"???
ROFL
Yeah, that makes you a real, live scientist.
And I've forgotten more about language than you'll ever know. What you attempt to define as "informal usage", rational people call "blatant inaccuracy for the purpose of misdirection".
A broad brush is necessary to accurately limn such an enormous number of mouth-breathing, willfully-ignorant morons.
For starters, it takes, on average, about 10 years for a person facing the death penalty to exhaust all their appeals. And those typically involve a lot of court time (which costs a lot of money). And keeping somebody on Death Row is more expensive than keeping them in the general prison population. Ec cetera.
Sorry, I really don't have time for a detailed response (truth, not bullshit), but I looked into this fairly deeply, and just about every reputable study on the subject came out the same. Nobody admits it, but there's far, far more bureaucracy involved in death penalty cases than those imposing multiple consecutive life sentences.
I guess you didn't know that on balance, it costs more to execute somebody than to keep them in prison for life.
I don't look down on the USA. I just laugh at it.
Whenever want to persuade an American to my point of view, I simply start a sentence with "America has the best (fill in anything) in the world". Then I watch as their tiny, propaganda-dulled brains shut down, and they nod solemnly. Then they mindlessly slurp up whatever I present as just a tiny bit of tinkering to make something great even better.
It never fails.
Do you speak English? Clearly you don't write it very well. No doubt this is part-and-parcel with your inability to understand science, mathematics or just about anything else having to do with rational thought.
Just for starters, you might want to review your understanding of the word "theory" as it applies to science. And poseur is a noun, not a verb, moron.
I believe, sir, that you many be onto something.
No, you have what you believe. I have what I can prove.
This is why so many religious people are worthy of nothing more than the pity of rational humans. Contempt and disgust are also options, when religious fanatics engage in the kind of dishonest nonsense that seems to be your meat and bread.
Isn't it interesting that Alzheimer's Reagan was one of the best presidents of the last 50 years.
You're either ignorant, stupid or a troll. There is no other reasonable conclusion.
You think you'll be around then? LOL. The only hope of an afterlife is if we figure out how to do it ourselves...maybe by downloading our mind into some kind of computer.
And then, yet again, humans will have stuffed god into an even smaller box, and made believers look even more foolish.
I agree with you, but I think it will prove to be easier than you believe. They've already sequenced the genome of a lot of mammals, and that's a long first step.