Here is a company that will sell you a complete system. Various sizings with prices included. You correctly hit on their biggest benefit which is that they take abuse well, but their cons make them not all that worthwhile for almost all other applications. Low specific energy, heavy, poor charge retention, and cost of manufacture. Also each cell has a fairly low max discharge rate compared to other batteries of similar capacity. So at present they really are only good for home level renewable storage where space isn't a huge concern. For grid level storage there are better cheaper solutions like sodium-sulfur batteries which would be better for grid operators to use.
Since that would have been the Lord of Darkness, it wasn't just one switch, it was all of them, as well as a set of points, and probably a couple of wiring harnesses plus an ignition coil.
Those old 4.0L I6 engines were a great as were the AMC manual gear boxes that some were connected to. Those could take a lot of abuse. However anything that was Chrysler designed on those vehicles was crap
I believe that is a perfectly valid excuse to fire someone, especially if they aren't part of a protected class. If they are then you need to make sure they are make a freight train take a dirt road ugly, and be sure to document it.
I always take these stories with a hug grain of salt considering that most places view being attacked or targeted as some idiot doing a random port scan or launching blind armitage attacks against some random machine. So the takeaway here is that 90% of firms are actually looking at their log data and misunderstanding it, about 9% aren't even doing that, and about 1% realize that what they are seeing is really just bullshit noise and that they aren't being directly targeted but are being hit by the random internet attacks that go after what ever they can find.
Most cops went into the job because... , washed out of the military...
I seem to remember reading or hearing about that cops who were former military were less likely to shoot someone and generally did a better job. Yup it appears that I did read that so I would prefer to have more ex-military cops given the available evidence.
Actually it is legal to take pictures from any public location of things that people would not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. This would include things like the exterior of our house, the car in your driveway, crap in your backyard, etc. so long as it is plainly visible from the street. However it would likely exclude me from setting up my 1000mm lens and using that to take pictures of the interior of your house or if you have a fence climbing that fence to snap a picture of what is on the other side.
Depending on the laws in your state there may be various options. Most if not all ALPRs (automated license plate readers) operate in the IR spectrum which is why a lot of states have recently redesigned their plates so that they are very high contrast in the IR spectrum. This becomes important in determining how to defeat them within the law. Do some states still allow license plate covers? If so and you happen to be in one get one that is opaque in the IR, or use a clear paint that is IR opaque. Now if you don't live in a state where covers are legal you have a harder time. About the only thing you could do (again depending on vehicle illumination laws) is flood out lots of IR near the plate and horribly throw off the metering. By lots I mean like 100s of watts as you want it to be like taking a picture of the sun and push the auto exposure so far out of wack that it darkens everything else. If someone wants some info on what others have tried here is one guy who tried to get the flaring effect but was only working with a few watts of power. Again he might of had better success if he went up to 100s of watts, but still I think the best bet would be to go for throwing the exposure off.
100s of watts isn't really anything when your car is running but will quickly drain your batter when off so there you would either have to go without or plug the thing in.
While quantum computers don't break symmetric key ciphers like AES they do offer a massive speed up by using Grover's Algorithm. So instead of having a problem with difficulty of 2^n you have a problem with a difficulty of 2^(n/2) with symmetric key crypto. Because quantum computers have been the next new hotness for many years now and with Grover's Algorithm being know the AES competition had the foresight to realize that the next generation cipher would likely need to resist it so instead of going with 128 bits they wanted a 256 bit option. So AES256 on a quantum computer is as difficult to break as AES128 is on a classical computer. So even on an ideal quantum computer cracking an AES256 encrypted message would require a large fraction of a large nation state's total annual energy production instead of having stellar mass energy level requirements on a classical computer.
The problem come in because using Shor's Algorithm on a quantum computer absolutely destroys asymmetric key encryption like RSA. It also does the same to all problems based off of discrete logarithms, factorization, and elliptical curves. So basically all of the commonly used public key options. It does appear however that there is a solution available that is resistant to quantum computers called lattice base cryptography which I still need to spend time on understanding but looks promising.
This is true for a lot of activities, and even within my family I have an example that matches yours. I have an aunt who at her peak was the #3 ranked female cyclist in the US, now almost 40 years later she is still a better cyclist than I could hope to be.
If it the engine in my car an aluminum block with cast iron sleeves with water channels around it to keep it cool enough so it doesn't weaken too much to suffer damage from the heating caused by combustion. Is it hard for you to walk and chew gum at the same time?
But you don't understand. When Obama did that it was a (good/horriable) thing but when Trump does that it is a (horriable/good) thing.
If you are a staunch democrat pick the first option, if you are a staunch republican pick the second option. Sadly this is how most American politics has become.
I apply nonsensical tags to everything on facebook. At one point it would find a face when presented with a picture of a mariposa lily so I tagged it as my face. I got a bunch of friends to do the same. I wonder if it is still confused by that.
Nice, that is a labour of love (and chopping, welding, swearing, bashing with a hammer;) )
Sounds about right. I will hopefully be getting back to it soon as the the kids are old enough that they can finally be left along in the house for several hours unsupervised. I'm going the 5spd conversion path with modern suspension, and 4 wheel disk as well. General plan for the motor is a super charged alcohol burner because I haven't seen anyone else do one and I want to push that motor farther than most. There is a lot of room for improvement with those engines and I want to see if I can get it up around the 250bhp range for S&Gs. BMC really did little to no development on that engine which created a huge space for aftermarket makers.
If they weren't dirt common and not even iconic cars I would probably feel bad about not doing a 100% true to factory restoration but it is a post war midget with the 1275cc motor so not like my buddy's 76 Olds 442 Hurst edition. I don't plan on making money ever off of it but just wanted a small fun car. I wanted smaller but the wife said no but the midget was acceptable because I truthfully told her it was twice the size.
Hence why I said close to 100% zooms. For slide shows these would be awesome as they would be able to deliver on the illusion of almost endless resolution in a photograph but that also would require that the image be taken on a higher end current gen FF camera or top end previous gen FF camera with a good lens and someone capable of taking a shot of that quality. For panoramic images I would want something wall sized and even higher resolution as I have some that are in the 600MP range that I have created. Granted I am still working on my technique so they aren't the best panos but still are pretty nice.
But what the naysayers are ignore is how awesome these will be for images
I can now display images that are close to 100% zoom from my DSLR (36MP) or similar effective resolution of 35mm film scans. These silly TV resolutions however do seem like the ever increasing pixel counts on point and shoot and cell phone cameras though. It is somethign that is simple to understand and easy to market to but is something that is likely falling into more hype than anything else.
Are you the same guy that berated me for there not being assault rifles available in the US?
No that wouln't be me. While I am fairly pro gun, I'm not one of those crazies that thinks that everyone should own a full auto M14. That said I do disagree with a lot of the hysteria about intermediate powered semi-automatic rifles (think semi-auto AKs, ARs, SKSes or other guns that shoot.223 or 7.62x39 rounds). Especially the complaints that they are only good for killing people or that they are weapons of war. For years I used a SKS for deer hunting (AK predecessor shoots the same round) and it is very effective for putting a deer in the freezer. I have a buddy who goes out prairie dog hunting in SD on his parent's property with an AR platform gun a couple of times a year, I have other buddies who go out coyote hunting with ARs. These aren't the type of people you hear about making the news as they, like myself, are responsible owners. We don't sit there and fantasize that we will be the lone survivors of some civilization ending event or defending our selves from our own government. Hell with firearms like those we even realize that they would be ineffective for defending our home from a random intruder. We have all had quite a bit of training on the proper care, use, handling, and storage of them as well, which far too many people seem to lack. However the things those guns mostly shoot are empty cans at our various properties up in the north woods. However I do have one friend who is someone who should not own a gun yet owns a Frankenstein AR he built from parts and an 80% receiver because he thinks he needs it to protect himself from the government or that society will collapse in about 3 months.
Also it is still possible to get a real fully auto weapon legally in the US, they are just gong to be expensive, old, a bitch to find, and an overall pain in the ass to own given what you have to agree to.
What kind of artillery piece and shell are we talking about here? I'm thinking a W48 shell out of a 155mm Howitzer would do. You know, just to be sure.
Some missing info from the sumamry about the average number of missing patches per device from each manufacturer
Average missing patches per device from each manufacturer
0 or 1 - Google, Samsung, and Sony
1 to 3 - Xiaomi, OnePlus, and Nokia
3 to 4 - HTC, Huawei, LG, and Motorola
4 or more - TCL and ZTE
Slashdot Mirror
Here is a company that will sell you a complete system. Various sizings with prices included. You correctly hit on their biggest benefit which is that they take abuse well, but their cons make them not all that worthwhile for almost all other applications. Low specific energy, heavy, poor charge retention, and cost of manufacture. Also each cell has a fairly low max discharge rate compared to other batteries of similar capacity. So at present they really are only good for home level renewable storage where space isn't a huge concern. For grid level storage there are better cheaper solutions like sodium-sulfur batteries which would be better for grid operators to use.
Since that would have been the Lord of Darkness, it wasn't just one switch, it was all of them, as well as a set of points, and probably a couple of wiring harnesses plus an ignition coil.
Those old 4.0L I6 engines were a great as were the AMC manual gear boxes that some were connected to. Those could take a lot of abuse. However anything that was Chrysler designed on those vehicles was crap
I believe that is a perfectly valid excuse to fire someone, especially if they aren't part of a protected class. If they are then you need to make sure they are make a freight train take a dirt road ugly, and be sure to document it.
I always take these stories with a hug grain of salt considering that most places view being attacked or targeted as some idiot doing a random port scan or launching blind armitage attacks against some random machine. So the takeaway here is that 90% of firms are actually looking at their log data and misunderstanding it, about 9% aren't even doing that, and about 1% realize that what they are seeing is really just bullshit noise and that they aren't being directly targeted but are being hit by the random internet attacks that go after what ever they can find.
And here I thought the network is the computer
Most cops went into the job because ... , washed out of the military ...
I seem to remember reading or hearing about that cops who were former military were less likely to shoot someone and generally did a better job. Yup it appears that I did read that so I would prefer to have more ex-military cops given the available evidence.
Actually it is legal to take pictures from any public location of things that people would not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. This would include things like the exterior of our house, the car in your driveway, crap in your backyard, etc. so long as it is plainly visible from the street. However it would likely exclude me from setting up my 1000mm lens and using that to take pictures of the interior of your house or if you have a fence climbing that fence to snap a picture of what is on the other side.
Depending on the laws in your state there may be various options. Most if not all ALPRs (automated license plate readers) operate in the IR spectrum which is why a lot of states have recently redesigned their plates so that they are very high contrast in the IR spectrum. This becomes important in determining how to defeat them within the law. Do some states still allow license plate covers? If so and you happen to be in one get one that is opaque in the IR, or use a clear paint that is IR opaque. Now if you don't live in a state where covers are legal you have a harder time. About the only thing you could do (again depending on vehicle illumination laws) is flood out lots of IR near the plate and horribly throw off the metering. By lots I mean like 100s of watts as you want it to be like taking a picture of the sun and push the auto exposure so far out of wack that it darkens everything else. If someone wants some info on what others have tried here is one guy who tried to get the flaring effect but was only working with a few watts of power. Again he might of had better success if he went up to 100s of watts, but still I think the best bet would be to go for throwing the exposure off.
100s of watts isn't really anything when your car is running but will quickly drain your batter when off so there you would either have to go without or plug the thing in.
The answer would be yes given that the block size for AES is 128 bits as those 27 characters gives you over 1.5 blocks.
While quantum computers don't break symmetric key ciphers like AES they do offer a massive speed up by using Grover's Algorithm. So instead of having a problem with difficulty of 2^n you have a problem with a difficulty of 2^(n/2) with symmetric key crypto. Because quantum computers have been the next new hotness for many years now and with Grover's Algorithm being know the AES competition had the foresight to realize that the next generation cipher would likely need to resist it so instead of going with 128 bits they wanted a 256 bit option. So AES256 on a quantum computer is as difficult to break as AES128 is on a classical computer. So even on an ideal quantum computer cracking an AES256 encrypted message would require a large fraction of a large nation state's total annual energy production instead of having stellar mass energy level requirements on a classical computer.
The problem come in because using Shor's Algorithm on a quantum computer absolutely destroys asymmetric key encryption like RSA. It also does the same to all problems based off of discrete logarithms, factorization, and elliptical curves. So basically all of the commonly used public key options. It does appear however that there is a solution available that is resistant to quantum computers called lattice base cryptography which I still need to spend time on understanding but looks promising.
EC crypto is even easier to crack using quantum computers than RSA is.
This is true for a lot of activities, and even within my family I have an example that matches yours. I have an aunt who at her peak was the #3 ranked female cyclist in the US, now almost 40 years later she is still a better cyclist than I could hope to be.
If it the engine in my car an aluminum block with cast iron sleeves with water channels around it to keep it cool enough so it doesn't weaken too much to suffer damage from the heating caused by combustion. Is it hard for you to walk and chew gum at the same time?
But you don't understand. When Obama did that it was a (good/horriable) thing but when Trump does that it is a (horriable/good) thing.
If you are a staunch democrat pick the first option, if you are a staunch republican pick the second option. Sadly this is how most American politics has become.
I apply nonsensical tags to everything on facebook. At one point it would find a face when presented with a picture of a mariposa lily so I tagged it as my face. I got a bunch of friends to do the same. I wonder if it is still confused by that.
Nice, that is a labour of love (and chopping, welding, swearing, bashing with a hammer ;) )
Sounds about right. I will hopefully be getting back to it soon as the the kids are old enough that they can finally be left along in the house for several hours unsupervised. I'm going the 5spd conversion path with modern suspension, and 4 wheel disk as well. General plan for the motor is a super charged alcohol burner because I haven't seen anyone else do one and I want to push that motor farther than most. There is a lot of room for improvement with those engines and I want to see if I can get it up around the 250bhp range for S&Gs. BMC really did little to no development on that engine which created a huge space for aftermarket makers.
If they weren't dirt common and not even iconic cars I would probably feel bad about not doing a 100% true to factory restoration but it is a post war midget with the 1275cc motor so not like my buddy's 76 Olds 442 Hurst edition. I don't plan on making money ever off of it but just wanted a small fun car. I wanted smaller but the wife said no but the midget was acceptable because I truthfully told her it was twice the size.
British car humor is best understood by those who have experienced it. Mine is a 68 Midget that has been stalled in the restoration process.
The problem there is finding Whitworth spanners and replacement Lucas Electric smoke
Hence why I said close to 100% zooms. For slide shows these would be awesome as they would be able to deliver on the illusion of almost endless resolution in a photograph but that also would require that the image be taken on a higher end current gen FF camera or top end previous gen FF camera with a good lens and someone capable of taking a shot of that quality. For panoramic images I would want something wall sized and even higher resolution as I have some that are in the 600MP range that I have created. Granted I am still working on my technique so they aren't the best panos but still are pretty nice.
But what the naysayers are ignore is how awesome these will be for images
I can now display images that are close to 100% zoom from my DSLR (36MP) or similar effective resolution of 35mm film scans. These silly TV resolutions however do seem like the ever increasing pixel counts on point and shoot and cell phone cameras though. It is somethign that is simple to understand and easy to market to but is something that is likely falling into more hype than anything else.
Do these researchers not know of Wal*Mart?
Are you the same guy that berated me for there not being assault rifles available in the US?
No that wouln't be me. .223 or 7.62x39 rounds). Especially the complaints that they are only good for killing people or that they are weapons of war. For years I used a SKS for deer hunting (AK predecessor shoots the same round) and it is very effective for putting a deer in the freezer. I have a buddy who goes out prairie dog hunting in SD on his parent's property with an AR platform gun a couple of times a year, I have other buddies who go out coyote hunting with ARs. These aren't the type of people you hear about making the news as they, like myself, are responsible owners. We don't sit there and fantasize that we will be the lone survivors of some civilization ending event or defending our selves from our own government. Hell with firearms like those we even realize that they would be ineffective for defending our home from a random intruder. We have all had quite a bit of training on the proper care, use, handling, and storage of them as well, which far too many people seem to lack. However the things those guns mostly shoot are empty cans at our various properties up in the north woods. However I do have one friend who is someone who should not own a gun yet owns a Frankenstein AR he built from parts and an 80% receiver because he thinks he needs it to protect himself from the government or that society will collapse in about 3 months.
While I am fairly pro gun, I'm not one of those crazies that thinks that everyone should own a full auto M14. That said I do disagree with a lot of the hysteria about intermediate powered semi-automatic rifles (think semi-auto AKs, ARs, SKSes or other guns that shoot
Also it is still possible to get a real fully auto weapon legally in the US, they are just gong to be expensive, old, a bitch to find, and an overall pain in the ass to own given what you have to agree to.
What kind of artillery piece and shell are we talking about here? I'm thinking a W48 shell out of a 155mm Howitzer would do. You know, just to be sure.
Some missing info from the sumamry about the average number of missing patches per device from each manufacturer
Average missing patches per device from each manufacturer
0 or 1 - Google, Samsung, and Sony
1 to 3 - Xiaomi, OnePlus, and Nokia
3 to 4 - HTC, Huawei, LG, and Motorola
4 or more - TCL and ZTE