Slashdot Mirror


The Whole World is Now a Computer, Says Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella (zdnet.com)

Thanks to cloud computing, the Internet of Things and artificial intelligence, we should start to think of the planet as one giant computer, according to Microsoft chief executive Satya Nadella. From a report: "Digital technology, pervasively, is getting embedded in every place: every thing, every person, every walk of life is being fundamentally shaped by digital technology -- it is happening in our homes, our work, our places of entertainment," said Nadella speaking in London. "It's amazing to think of a world as a computer. I think that's the right metaphor for us as we go forward."

[...] AI is core to Microsoft's strategy, Nadella said: "AI is the run time which is going to shape all of what we do going forward in terms of applications as well as the platform." Microsoft is rethinking its core products by using AI to connect them together, he said, giving an example of a meeting using translation, transcription, Microsoft's HoloLens and other devices to improve decision-making. "The idea that you can now use all of the computing power that is around you -- this notion of the world as a computer -- completely changes how you conduct a meeting and fundamentally what presence means for a meeting," he said.

182 comments

  1. Obvious conclusion: by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella is a fucking idiot.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Obvious conclusion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was already widely known (see Windows 10), but additional supporting evidence is always welcome.

    2. Re:Obvious conclusion: by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella is a fucking idiot.

      I find him a lot like Bill Gates, for good or bad.

    3. Re:Obvious conclusion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe he meant what he said, and he wants that computer to only run Windows, so Windows can run the world.

    4. Re:Obvious conclusion: by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

      Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella is a fucking idiot.

      The world is a computer and it's running Window's Vista.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re:Obvious conclusion: by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      The world is a computer and it's running Window's Vista.

      That explains a lot.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    6. Re:Obvious conclusion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, he wasn't born into his position as CEO of Microsoft. That is a position coveted by some of the most ruthless, and competent, people in the world.

      You think he defeated them all out of sheer luck?

      It is naive of you, a mere pauper by comparison, to call him and idiot.

    7. Re:Obvious conclusion: by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Yup, that's apropos.

    8. Re:Obvious conclusion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus wept.

      This will give me night terrors for weeks.

    9. Re: Obvious conclusion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod up. Best comment thus far.

    10. Re:Obvious conclusion: by Order_66 · · Score: 1

      He isn't even half the man that Gates was during his prime.

    11. Re:Obvious conclusion: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      He isn't even half the man that Gates was during his prime.

      In what sense? Strategic brilliance? Evil? I'm not necessarily claiming he is as strategically smart as Gates, just a similar personality. (MS is doing fairly well financially, I'd note.)

      For example, my personality is fairly similar to Leonardo da Vinci's, but I don't claim to be nearly as brilliant nor as creative. I formulate or encodify lots of different ideas, but procrastinate on the implementation and jump around between them, just like he did. (For example, table-oriented programming, table-oriented AI, dynamic relational, MASP {a map-oriented take on LISP}, merging file-system/database/cms into one system using dynamic relational, the "Assume Balance" accounting model as an alternative to double-entry model {which is bad factoring}, etc.) I also dabble in art and music, including auto-composing. Perhaps you can compare me to Leonardo with lead poisoning and/or football injuries. Who knows, maybe one day the ideas will catch on when the world realizes my brilliance. (Hey, stop coughing so loud.)

    12. Re:Obvious conclusion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was given the position by the board of directors so Microsoft could lodge itself like a tick into India, leverage his foreign connections, and fill every MS department with cheap dirty Indians. This maximises profit and reduces cost, kind of like the rolling-release piece-of-shit Indian OS that records everything you do, because Indians have no problem destroying any fabric of privacy or society if they benefit personally.

      Here's what shitbags like Nadella do, while the rest of their people live in dire squalor

    13. Re: Obvious conclusion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not many know this but the earth was ordered by mice

      Now.. who remembers the ultimate question?

    14. Re: Obvious conclusion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of this work you speak of is useful and I, speaking for the entirety of the human race, thank you for your contributions to society.

    15. Re: Obvious conclusion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parade Rainer here. Statistically, at least half of it probably sucks.

  2. A computer is nothing more than a tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and so is Satya Nadella

  3. I thought the network by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 3, Funny

    And here I thought the network is the computer

    --
    Time to offend someone
    1. Re:I thought the network by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      And here I thought the network is the computer

      It's walruses all the way down. I am he as you are he as you are me, and we are all together. Goo goo g'joob.

    2. Re:I thought the network by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      What's a computer? /StupidAppleAdvertisting

      posted from my mac mini.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:I thought the network by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      Also a warning of what could happen if you rely on computers to educate your children.

    4. Re:I thought the network by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "It's walruses all the way down. I am he as you are he as you are me, and we are all together. Goo goo g'joob."

      Good one. Got a joke for you:

      Cinderella came out of the photo shop and said sadly: One day my prints will come.

    5. Re:I thought the network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cue "Blue Screen Of Death" worldwide. Let's pray for it! 2019!

    6. Re:I thought the network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here I thought the network is the computer

      It's walruses all the way down. I am he as you are he as you are me, and we are all together. Goo goo g'joob.

      Ah, look at all the lonely people...

    7. Re:I thought the network by Miser · · Score: 1

      Didn't have to scroll far to find this.

      The Miser is pleased. :)

    8. Re:I thought the network by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      This is /.
      We like it that way.

  4. Or even more accuratly by avandesande · · Score: 1

    The world is a network of computers connected by the internet. Profound!

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  5. How original . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    The network is the computer.

    - John Burdette Gage (1996)

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    1. Re:How original . . . by greenwow · · Score: 1

      That was when the Wired article with that quote was published. Sun used that phrase for I think nearly a decade before that. I know I heard coworkers quote it many times when I managed Sun workstations in the late 1980s. That was a great time. Other than hard drive failures, which seemed to happen way too often especially with the 200 MB Maxtor SCSI drives, and the electromechanical eject mechanisms on the floppies, they just worked.

    2. Re:How original . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > electromechanical eject mechanisms on the floppies

      That feature was great since you couldn't eject the floppy until you unmounted it. I can't remember how many times I screwed-up with Linux and hit the eject button on a floppy before remembering to either type sync or unmount and then lost data. I managed about 150 SPARCstation 1 workstations, and our users had a lot of problems with them since they bought the cheapest floppies they could find in Computer Shopper so we had lots of problems with the metal shield keeping a disk from ejecting.

    3. Re:How original . . . by jddimarco · · Score: 1

      The 200MB Maxtors were rock-solid. The Quantums, on the other hand, had a sticktion problem. As for the Suns themselves, the ones built into CRTs (SLC and ELC) would bake themselves to death, but the other shoeboxes and pizzaboxes were quite reliable. Previous pre-pizzabox Suns were maybe a little less so.

    4. Re:How original . . . by greenwow · · Score: 1

      The 200MB Maxtors were rock-solid. The Quantums, on the other hand, had a sticktion problem. As for the Suns themselves, the ones built into CRTs (SLC and ELC) would bake themselves to death, but the other shoeboxes and pizzaboxes were quite reliable. Previous pre-pizzabox Suns were maybe a little less so.

      That wasn't my experience with the Maxtors, but you're right about the Quantums wrt stiction. Putting them in a freezer for a few minutes usually helped them start at least one more time. I saved many theses and dissertations using that method. I think I learned that trick from the old Usenet group comp.hardware.

    5. Re:How original . . . by quantumghost · · Score: 1

      The network is the computer.

      - John Burdette Gage (1996)

      Really? He lost to Douglas Adams by about 15 years......the successor to Deep Thought was the Earth.

      Whoosh!

    6. Re:How original . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bruce Schneier claims that not only is there a global computer but that it's also a robot in that it has access to sensors and controllers. Think utilities, homes, cars, office buildings, etc..

  6. It must be especially exciting... by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

    ... when you think that computer belongs to you.

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
  7. All the better to see what you are doing, m'dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "All the better to see what you are doing, m'dear" said the Wolf...

    No mention of how or even if your information will be separated from theirs...

  8. "The whole world is now a computer.." by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    ..and Miscreant-o-soft wants unhindered control over ALL OF IT. Time to break up Microsoft, they're getting too big for their pants.

    1. Re: "The whole world is now a computer.." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #GoogleShill

    2. Re: "The whole world is now a computer.." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #GiganticFaggot

      Seriously you think anyone likes dickhead Google any better than any other asshole company in this fucktarded country? LOL you're stupid.

  9. Answer by kackle · · Score: 1

    The percentage of my frustration: 42.

    1. Re: Answer by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Funny

      You could have just said * (which is ASCII 42)

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re: Answer by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

      You could have just said * (which is ASCII 42)

      Holy shit I never noticed that. Please tell me that was designed intentionally that way!

    3. Re: Answer by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      #mindblown

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re: Answer by RobertNotBob · · Score: 1

      My deepest apologies for wasting all of my MOD points before you made this post. --- Awesome.

      --
      ___ I don't respond to Anonymous Cowards, and I Never Mod them UP.
    5. Re: Answer by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I recently read that they suspect this is why Douglas Adams used the number 42 as the ultimate answer to life, the universe and everything, since he was a computer geek. Don't know if it is true or not.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    6. Re: Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ASCII code 42 is for the asterisk symbol, being a wildcard for everything.

      Incase anyone got wooooshed.

  10. The World is NOT a Computer by techmage · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The world may have a massive collection of computers. Huge sums of those machines are in cloud computing. But they are all separate. When all of them are connected and act as one, having access to everything all at once, then we will have a world computer. That moment is not now.

    --


    - We dream of the stars. Now let us return to them.
    1. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even then, the whole world won't be a computer. I for one don't plan on computerizing my lawn for example. Nor my toilet, I just don't want that to get hacked.

    2. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by bondsbw · · Score: 2

      When all of them are connected and act as one, having access to everything all at once, then we will have a world computer.

      The vast majority of computers are connected and have access to everything that is available to the general public.

      Their ability to "act as one" is arbitrary. I am one person, but my organs do vastly different things.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    3. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      I have a japanese toilet. I really don't want it to get hacked.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      OK, let me dumb it down for you: The world is not a fucking computer, and only a pretentious vastly overpaid moron would say that, even as a (terrible) analogy. Got it?

    5. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget which open and transparent company this is making the statement. Also, windows 10, spyware edition; All your base are belong to us.

    6. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      If Nadella really thinks that the World is a computer, then Microsoft's next product better damn well be "Windows for Earth".

    7. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      Your organs do vastly different things, and they all act as one supporting your body's ability to obey your commands and get the things you want done, done.

      That is what is missing with the computers of the world today. They are like a huge pile of organs in your analogy. You are not. Or so one would hope anyway. ;)

    8. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      Some do. Some like my heart don't obey my commands. My gut bacteria are only working for themselves, but as a byproduct they just happen to be useful to me. My appendix doesn't seem to have serve much of a purpose (other than potentially harmful).

      We say they work as one because on the macro level we can see a physical being known as me. Same could be said about computers, at the macro level they act together as the computer engine of the earth.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    9. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      At a macro level, we are an organism consisting of organs, and we have agency and capability to form and follow goals.

      That is what can not be said about computers. At the macro level they are just a pile of computers.

    10. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Cloud computing is largely about working with globally dispersed data centers as a unit. Many such services don't even distinguish individual computers within the network. I make requests to Amazon, not some specific computer located in a specific rack in a specific building.

      I am willing to concede that there isn't A global computer. More like, there are many global computers, in the sense that different corporate data centers and cloud vendors behave distinctly from each other. And of course there are many traditional computers which don't really interact much with any others.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
  11. So... collective consciousness? by macraig · · Score: 2

    Is this the beginning of the real life Borg, right here at home? I, for one, welcome our new Collective overlords who, being a collective, cannot possibly be as evil as the dictatorial monopolies and tribes we have now.

    1. Re:So... collective consciousness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turn in your sci-fi card.

    2. Re:So... collective consciousness? by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

      I personally believe collective consciousness has always been a thing, it's just humans that need to learn how to "access" it. We're evolving in that direction it seems. Unfortunately I hate thinking about how people currently "in power" would try to control it. I have the feeling AI will play a big role in that attempt.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    3. Re:So... collective consciousness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A human brain is a network of cells. You could also call it a collection of cells.

      Those cells share a collective consciousness when they function as a human person.

      So yes, collective consciousness has always been a thing. One could argue it is the only form of consciousness (if we take the position that a single cell is below the complexity threshold that consciousness requires). But, it isn't something humans are trying to tap into. It is exactly what humans are already an example of.

      We are just working on ways to expand our networking capacities. You know, the way the Borg do.

      Man, it will be awesome when we get there.

    4. Re:So... collective consciousness? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Is this the beginning of the real life Borg, right here at home? I, for one, welcome our new Collective overlords who, being a collective, cannot possibly be as evil as the dictatorial monopolies and tribes we have now.

      That sounds dangerously similar to an individual opinion, and collectives don't allow such acts of rebellion. Careful what you think, Comrade,the Telescreen is always on.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:So... collective consciousness? by macraig · · Score: 1

      What, me worry? Individual opinions that coincide collectively are a Consensus and a Movement!

    6. Re:So... collective consciousness? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Is this the beginning of the real life Borg, right here at home? I, for one, welcome our new Collective overlords who, being a collective, cannot possibly be as evil as the dictatorial monopolies and tribes we have now.

      Or earlier, Isaac Asimov (Nemesis; Foundation's Edge and Foundation and Earth).

  12. Let's call it Deep Thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Microsoft is copying again (Douglas Adams this time).

    1. Re:Let's call it Deep Thought by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      If you read the comment above and needed to know this was a quote by Douglas Adams, you don't belong here.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  13. That's frightening. by Pezbian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Imagine a worldwide BSOD.

    --
    In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
    1. Re:That's frightening. by greenwow · · Score: 1

      In the days of Ping of Death, that pretty much happened. Was teaching a CS class in 1997, and I was standing in the back of the room when I saw over thirty Windows machines all blue screen at once. At work, we would often have several floors worth of Windows machines blue screen within seconds. That bug also affected Linux, Solaris, FreeBSD, SunOS, Irix, OS/2, Novell, and HP printers that we had where I worked at the time so basically it was a "worldwide BSOD."

    2. Re:That's frightening. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Novell

      That was just hell. That was the only thing I ever saw crash a Novell server. We had many that had uptimes measured in years, but the ones that had the TCP/IP NLM and were reachable from the Internet (hey, it was a different time) would crash constantly. That was a huge problem because the Netware client for DOS and Windows would require you to reboot to reconnect.

    3. Re:That's frightening. by balbeir · · Score: 1

      It's not blue. It's orange

    4. Re:That's frightening. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think we are not in it? For all we know "civilization" may be evolutions BSOD routine, forcing all live to hard quit.

    5. Re:That's frightening. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the ransomware for your brain, man! Corporate indoctrination stealing your soul! Toxic is in the air, in water, in mind! Break free, before it breaks you! Now, my Rastafarian-Cyber style hair cut needs some conditioner, and my black leather overcoat some extra shine. Gotta go!

    6. Re:That's frightening. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a worldwide BSOD.

      I see a Blue Sky of Death

    7. Re:That's frightening. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think climate change is?

    8. Re:That's frightening. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      What do you think climate change is?

      Totally fake news! Loser scientists just want crooked government money, believe me! Bigly rigged.

  14. Windows 42 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally figured out THE question!

    Q: Which is the version of Windows that crashes the entire world?

  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. Capitalism by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've frequently suggested regulating economies and creating public services to use the market as a computer.

    In healthcare, for example, the US can provide a public option that guarantees everyone healthcare at all times. When they can get affordable care, we can put a payroll tax on their employer (and an additional income tax on their paycheck) for either the affordable rate or (if less) the amount they usually pay, thus ensuring neither gets a monetary benefit by selecting the public option over the employer's plan (selection of healthcare is 100% based on perceived quality of service).

    Medicare tries to calculate a local market rate for a service. That results in many things, such as providers who can provide the service at lower cost billing in-line with other providers in the area, thus making wide profit margins from the government.

    Our regulators have petabyte databases of remittance rates negotiated between every insurer and provider for every service. They're hooked up to powerful mainframes that can process the whole of this data in short hours. It's ridiculous.

    So at each individual (service,provider) tuple, we can compute the normal distribution of remittance rates, and then select two standard deviations down. That's our negotiation cap. The Federal Public Option--Medicare Part E--negotiates rates at individual providers already; instead of using the market rate, Medicare would use the low-end remittance rate.

    Somewhere, an insurer has negotiated a pretty good rate. The others might be getting robbed, but that doesn't matter. We are, at all times, for all services, nearly the ideal insurer.

    This obviously requires some consideration. Sometimes, the insurer paying less also gets less service--sorting that out takes a lot of time; or we just make that practice illegal. We'll have to tweak the regulations to fit around the obvious outcome of providers creating slightly-different, substantially-similar packages for each insurer, and further when we see what the providers actually do about all this when we tell them they're not allowed to screw around like that.

    Still. Wetware computer. No sinking tons of taxpayer resources into trying to win an information arms race against the market of suppliers, providers, and hospitals.

    There are other things we need. An investigation into why our healthcare costs so much (I've looked at every explanation given and we might be able to squeeze it down to maybe 15% of GDP while still getting less service than Germany at 11% GDP--something is broken, and e don't know what). Publish local market standards of fairness so the private insurers getting the worst deals can argue their rates down. Make all insurers and hospitals operate as not-for-profit.

    Universal healthcare is easy. Going from "universal healthcare" to "low-cost, high-performance universal healthcare" is going to take some work and the integrity to stick with it when it gets hard.

    1. Re:Capitalism by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I've frequently suggested regulating economies

      Because that has worked out so well in all sorts of places. It is like you don't even recognize that failures of the current system are linked to exactly what you're suggesting. I'll give you a big reason why, because you said this yourself.

      Universal healthcare is easy.

      No, it isn't. It is fraught with all sorts of difficult decisions that make really bad headlines, the most recent being Alfie Evans case in Britain, where the STATE decided to end life support, when there were other viable options outside that system.

      The fact that you claim "Universal healthcare is easy" is all the evidence that I need to keep you and anyone like you away from the economy.
       

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the cost to have services available on standby to service those with gold-plated plans? One of the reasons that health care in Canada is less is because there is very efficient use of available resources. This means waitlists are the norm for many procedures. In a private system, there is no waiting.

    3. Re:Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      " there were other viable options outside that system"
      no, these people were poor, they had no options, in USA he would of been dead before he even entered the hospital, if they were rich then a few capitalist healthcare providers would be a bit more richer but the end result would of been the same.

    4. Re:Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did any of your reading discuss why in the heck healthcare came to be so expensive in the first place? Hint: it wasn't a *lack* of government intervention in the marketplace that got us here.

    5. Re:Capitalism by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      They had options, including offers from other places to take and care for the boy. The state (UK) prevented them from leaving.

      Yes, they were poor, so now I know what Socialized Medicine really is, state control of poor people. How is that different than now again?

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    6. Re: Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit, you wait in a private system as well. They have to schedule you.

      Example: my son broke his pinky finger. Took them a week to do the surgery. Sat at the urgent care place for 6 hours getting diagnosed for a broken finger we already knew was broken.

  17. When you have a hammer, all the world is a nail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And when you're someone who sells software, the whole world is a computer.

    Surprisingly this is only about 50 years old.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_the_instrument

  18. Absolutization of one's domain by Bradmont · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is a common tendency among experts of every domain to absolutize their field : particle physicists tend to make every physical effect into a particle. Evolutionary biologists try to explain every behaviour as a result of natural selection. Clinical psychologists make everything a result of their chosen theory of mental health. Economists make economics the ultimate cause and solution of every human problem. When you spend your entire life digging deeply into one topic, you start to see the world through the lens of your expertise. Sometimes this can lead to great discoveries. But it often leads to harmful overgeneralizations, or making a fool of yourself in public. This is one of those latter cases.

    1. Re:Absolutization of one's domain by Monkey-Wrench-Inc · · Score: 1

      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

    2. Re:Absolutization of one's domain by Myrdos · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      "People are very seldom concerned with some kind of universal model of capital T Truth; they're almost always concerned with creating models that help them get their job done. This is inevitable, and it creates problems when you try to glue data from different sources together. The *unnecessary* problems that arise come from people who don't accept that their useful domain-specific models don't describe all of objective reality." -- Matt Leo

    3. Re:Absolutization of one's domain by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      The answer is Quills people, Quills.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    4. Re:Absolutization of one's domain by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      I am not a particle physicists, but in that list, they would seem to have the upper hand.

      Although, I presume that they would tend to make every physical effect into a particle or wave, or both.

      That would also take care of computers, the world and the CEO's ranting about computers.

    5. Re:Absolutization of one's domain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >But it often leads to harmful overgeneralizations

      Can you give one example of harm?

  19. Got a computer the size of a planet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and still can't manage to get it in the loo

    1. Re:Got a computer the size of a planet... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Underrated post.

    2. Re:Got a computer the size of a planet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when you're indian, the whole world is a toilet too

  20. What is a computer? by greenwow · · Score: 1

    Sounds like he is behind the times.

  21. If All You Have Is A Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...everything looks like a hard reset?

  22. The Mice by Strider- · · Score: 1

    I knew the mice must be in on it...

    Guess I'll just go back to my pan galactic gargleblaster.

    --
    ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    1. Re:The Mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have the barkeep (or replicator, as it may be) fix me up one if you don't mind.

    2. Re: The Mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HOT! Earl grey, black!

  23. To improve decision-making by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Microsoft could try to use AI technologies to improve their product naming, positioning, channel strategy and tactics, and customer service. Yes, buying Microsoft services is sometimes like talking to a deceitful, money and bonus hungry Bender bot which only delivers confusion and unnecessary functionalities to the buyer.

  24. Brahmin attitude - all of your stuff is mine by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Seriously, why is he saying this?

    GPDR this fool.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  25. Mother Brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What could possible go wrong?

  26. Managers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You gotta love their naivity and simplicity in thinking. Almost child-like.

  27. But... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

    we should start to think of the planet as one giant computer

    Does it run Linux?

  28. MS CEO discovers human language by saltydogdesign · · Score: 1

    Wow, metaphors are neat, aren't they? Here's one: Satya Nadella is a vacuum.

    --
    // This is not a sig.
    1. Re:MS CEO discovers human language by avandesande · · Score: 1

      more of a tautology "the earth is a computer because I called the earth a computer"

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:MS CEO discovers human language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a filthy brown vacuum and he should be deported back to Vacuumdia.

  29. "Whole world is now a computer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I confess, I fear an Orange Screen of Death.

    1. Re:"Whole world is now a computer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      spray tan of death

  30. Oh shut up you asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My garden is not a computer. My tennis racket is not a computer. My guitar is not a computer. My beer is not a computer. My new grill does have the ability to send temperature readings to my phone though, but I have not enabled that.

    1. Re:Oh shut up you asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have been found in violation of statute 27432 - Not enabling an owned internet device. You will be fined $500 per offense per day. Please enable all your devices or this fine will increase to $1000 per day on week two, and lead to imprisonment on week three.

      Thank you for your urgent attention to this matter.

  31. Blue Sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...of death

  32. The world is not a computer. by quietwalker · · Score: 2

    It's so unrelated to the concept he is trying to describe - that (primarily the citizens of advanced nations) encounter or operate some sort of microcontroller or computer so many times in their daily life that they can be considered ubiquitous and having a great impact on our life - that it's not a useful metaphor nor phrase.

    Pick any other technology that's done the same. Like, I dunno, cars.

    "It's amazing to think of a world as a car. I think that's the right metaphor for us as we go forward."

    Look how stupid that sounds. Same with just about every other transformational technology; radio, tv, cell phones, airplanes, etc. It's not a useful abstraction or insightful discussion point. It's pure pablum.

    1. Re:The world is not a computer. by tsa · · Score: 1

      It's managers' speak. Everyone but managers themselves knows that managers usually say mindbogglingly stupid things.

      --

      -- Cheers!

  33. Satya Nadella says by mandark1967 · · Score: 1

    "The idea that you can now use all of the computing power that is around you -- this notion of the world as a computer -- completely changes how you conduct a meeting and fundamentally what presence means for a meeting,"

    mIRC 365, anyone?

    --
    Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
  34. Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the same stupid cunt who is responsible for windows 10.

    Join the dots.

  35. The Metaphor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Metaphor is now a reality.

    - AC

  36. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  37. Initiate by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    Human Computer Formation

  38. The WHOLE world? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The whole world is a computer."

    Does this include parts of the world that aren't computers, like toasted whole wheat bread and orangutans?

    1. Re:The WHOLE world? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bread is a capacitor, and orangutans are cheap, generic, volatile memory.

  39. If all the world is a computer by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

    I sure fucking hope it's OS isn't Windows.

    Or anything BUT open source based for that matter.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:If all the world is a computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool so you prefer some other proprietary OS where we can start over and they can make all the same amateur security mistakes Microsoft did, but on a global scale? I'm sticking with my open source, thanks.

  40. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean the whole world is forced to stop for 30 minutes to an hour whenever âoeWindows has found some updatesâ?

  41. A hope by techdolphin · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just hope that nobody decides to reboot. That would mean 4.5 billion years down the drain.

    As an aside, can somebody improve my memory retrieval function? It has been having some issues lately.

    1. Re:A hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Backups! What about backups?

      Uninterruptible Power Supply! What happens when the power goes out?

    2. Re:A hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just hope that nobody decides to reboot.

      "Sir, there seems to be a large object in the path of our-

    3. Re:A hope by antdude · · Score: 1

      God is the admin. He can do whatever He wants. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  42. Nailed it. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    When all you have is a hammer...

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  43. That was SUN's slogan, Nutella by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many people got your post. That was SUN's slogan. The Network is the computer. They were still using that up until they ceased.

    I wonder if Nutella knows that?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:That was SUN's slogan, Nutella by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nadella is an ex-Sun employee....

  44. 42 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all.

  45. When geese need GPS for navigation... by newbie_fantod · · Score: 1

    ...I'll take this statement a little more seriously.

    The vast majority of Earths inhabitants have absolutely no use for computers, and aren't even aware of their existence.

  46. AI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Again with the AI bandwagon.

    Satya, if you can come up with an AI that simply solves all Windows Update problems, no matter how fucked up a state a given Windows machine is, I'll be impressed.

    Start with that. Then move on from there.

    1. Re:AI? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Actually they programmed AI to do exactly this and it said to roll back to Windows 7. I guess they didn't like the answer.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  47. Or even more accurately: Nadella is a computer! by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    "The Whole World is Now a Computer, Says Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella."

    Computers are trying to sell the idea that they will rule the world. Satya Nadella is one of those computers. Think that's wrong? Think Nadella is probably human? I have proof! A human would never treat other humans so badly as forcing them to see advertisements on Windows 10 desktop computers.

    Someone! Make the world a better place! Find Satya Nadella's off switch. Leave him off until major updates are available. (I hope the updates are of better quality than those for Windows 10.)

    Okay, that's a joke, with strong truthful elements.

  48. Off Topic and Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeesh. One of the fleets of FOSS fanatics. Nadella makes an architectural observation about the world and you immediately lapse into a screed about the merits of this or that product or development philosophy.

    1. Re: Off Topic and Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) it's not off topic.
      2) he didn't do any of the things you accused him of.

      Boring.

    2. Re: Off Topic and Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously doesn't know what a "screed" is. Probably some MS dirtbag from India.

  49. And I'll bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this world-wide computer only needs 640K of RAM.

  50. Obligatory by jklappenbach · · Score: 1

    42.

  51. corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Large corporations have AI and the servers central to that world wide computer.
    Think of it as the old mainframe and all our little computers are dumb peripherals feeding in information.

  52. How can it be, by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    that the CEO of one of the world's largest and most important tech companies can spout so much blatant, blithering nonsense? This missive sounds like one those pseudo-profound 'revelations' that rock the worlds of people who are very stoned on really good weed. Most of these people, when they come down from the high, recognize the sophomoric and pedestrian nature of their 'insights'. Maybe Satya is still stoned - or maybe he simply has that combination of narcissism and stupidity that that is the hallmark of those who habitually have their heads up their own asses.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  53. Says who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Deterministic, quantifiable, brute forced, and boring. Not my idea of the real world. But looks like we're hurtling toward a nihilistic identity crisis regardless.

  54. And BSOD is.... by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    World is a computer, and its Blue Screen Of Death is made of resource exhaustion, climate change, and loss of biodiversity.

  55. Re:Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole world is a farm, Tardchris. That means that even though you'll retire on the streets we can still feed you, you land-based cetacean.

  56. Re: Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For someone who has a book overdue for six months, you sure have a lot of time to shitpost!

    Say, how are your security certs coming along? Those a massive failure as well?

    How's the weight? Pushing 450 these days?

    "actually he has a large retirement fund stashed away that he just chooses not to discuss."

    Lol, now you know his retirement fund? (I preserved your bizarre sentence, Tardchris.)

  57. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft needs to do a LOT more work on all of their APIs for CosmosDB before they can say something like that.

  58. The End by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Behold the Beast, and cryptocurrency, it's Mark.

  59. Re: Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should sell all your silver to pay off your credit card debt right now!
    Finish your security certs so that you can get a job that doesn't leave you budgeting to the penny!
    Hurry it's not too late!

  60. Re: Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I'm confused.

  61. Beowulf cluster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of that!

    Wait, what?

    What's a Beowulf cluster?

  62. Re: Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Now", Tardchris? Your entire life is a confused mess.

  63. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  64. Re: Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That doesnâ(TM)t really seem relevant....

  65. Re: Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think TCDR is under the impression that if Funco is successful then videos about funco dolls will also generate tons of cash. Except according to his own article the reason funco is so successful is because the margin on simple plastic dolls is extremely high and they're buying up tons of cheap licenses like the golden girls and other properties that don't have a lot of merchandise. Actually read the article TCDR.

    So maybe you should buy some stock and sell it next year. But before you do that you need to pay off your credit cards by selling all your silver!!!! Hurry TCDR!!! Every day you wait is another dollar in the shitter! Another weird night listening to other dudes jack it in the homeless shelter.
    You should remove all entertainment from your commute, no videos on your phone, no novels on your ereader or in your bag. Carry nothing except for your certification books and study!!! Hurry TCDR every day you wait is another day of pissing right in the face of your future self!!!
    Leave all your video equipment at work it's a distraction, remove all temporary fleeting happiness from your life for a mere 6 months so you can focus!!! 6 months now could be the difference between retiring to a lifestyle that you're used to in the midwest or spending your twilight years homeless waiting on subsidized retirement housing to open up.
    Then you can look forward to being neighbors with old hookers and tweekers. You can see them on the streets of SF today, Sitting outside their buildings on their mobility scooters in the way of pedestrian traffic selling off their prescriptions. But hey it's a retirement plan!

  66. Re: Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funco pops are like beanie babies. Anyhow if you went and read that fortune article and followed through with your investments you'd know they're nearly worth a billion right now and you'd have nearly doubled your investment. I think it looks like a promising place to put some money for a year but investing in actual funco pops? As an investment?
    All except a select few beanie babies, collectable cards, or furbies sold today would have kept up with DJA if you'd bought them regular price in 1995. Of course many of the most such valuable items reached a high or ever higher market value in the 90s so even if you had a somewhat valuable beanie baby today you could have still lost a considerable amount of money. This will be no different or is it "this time it's different, trust me"?

    I ask you also to consider the cost of storing and moving such items, I tell you packing and moving an entire collection of 10 year old plastic crap into your subsidized retirement efficiency will incur a hefty hidden cost.

  67. Re: Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tardchris has this knack for latching on to one hare-brained scheme after another. He's so in love with hearing himself he can't stop talking about his schemes, until he tires of them and moves on to the next nonsensical idea.

    Remember his "haiku" ebook "Unemployable"? Available January 1st 2018? Oops, he lost interest. Remember his security certs? Yeah, neither does he!

    Undiagnosed personality disorders, probably medical brain problems, rough childhood, bad metabolism; he's doing the best he can, I guess.

  68. Okay! Now I get it! by Doctrinsograce · · Score: 1

    I wondered why the world is full of so many bugs. :-)

  69. Re: Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And in just a month and a half, if you're lucky, earn $50! Way better than getting a job that pays twice as much!

  70. Re: Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't change a thing. Right now the most profitable things you can do
    1. Pay off your gosh darned credit cards with your silver.
    2. Follow through on learning something that's hot on the job market right now.
    Your options here: Pirated and free study materials optionally getting a cert at the end; EdX and optionally paying 50 dollars for an EdX cert; Joining a nerd club in your area where you build robots or launch a startup; Attending a community college, attending a bootcamp.
    3. Get a raise or a new job.
    This will only help you in your pursuit of your more pie in the sky goals of running your own business, making novelty investments, and writing books. The time lost to your long term goals will be quickly made up with a little extra cash in your pockets.
    Why?
    You will have more free time and a larger steady source of income to put into your projects which will enhance their ability to make money. The fact that having money makes it easier to make money is indisputable. Well, unless you're some sort of Republican or something.

    Don't forget the benefits of being a direct hire employee at a major corporation. Working remotely, top of the line insurances, 401k matching, stock purchase plans, catered meals, free bus passes, p-cards, business travel, discounts, phone, laptop, quilted northern toilet paper in the bathrooms, co-workers who all know what Slashdot is.
    All over the world there are helpdesk drones, factory network guys, and cable repairmen stuck in their jobs with no choices. Who would kill to have access to the job market and career options that you do. Yet here you are. Working the sort of jobs that might actually be available where they live.

    Hurry! You could complete step 1 by Tuesday and have Steps 2 and 3 done by the end of the year!!!

    It's not too late!!

  71. Re: Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And in just a month and a half, if you're lucky, earn $50! Way better than getting a job that pays twice as much!

    You want creimer to trade in passive income for earned income (i.e., another job)?

  72. Re: Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You want creimer to trade in passive income"

    50$

    "for earned income"

    100000$.

    What do you think, Tardchris?

  73. Re: Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In addition to that $50 is nothing compared to a decent salary, it isnâ(TM)t really passive if you have to make a video and then actively spam it. You canâ(TM)t just sit back and keep making $50 for the next twenty years.

  74. Re: Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. People with lots of earned income have better opportunities to earn passive income.
    You're already going into work every single day until you retire, and a better job will help you earn passive income in so many ways.
    That guy who wrote the long tail book you wank over still had a number of normal high income jobs.... and he's still working.
    Speaking of which.
    How many of your current projects are truly long tail? Funco pops are a fad, nobody's 1990s beanie baby "homepage" is making money off their doubleclick ads these days. Every year your videos will have a new set of comic con videos to compete with. Plus just recently you were recently stung by a change in youtube policy, a situation you were warned of. It could happen again.

    If you made 100k you could dump 105 - 15k a year into your 401k and health savings plan to dodge taxes, pay off your credit cards and keep all that interest you're paying now and dump another 30k to 40k into your projects and you'd pay around the same amount of taxes you're paying now up until the point your projects generate enough income to push you into a new tax bracket and then you can dodge that tax by investing all of excess the income into business expenses. Really.
    If you put 30k into your vlog you could claim all that shit as business expenses, get 5% back towards airline miles with the right credit card, and have your pick of monitization options, all of which pay much better than youtube. Hell you could save yourself a ton of money and still host them all on youtube, still get your youtube cash, and get outside clicks off your blog to "game the youtube algorithm" and also collect money off the ads on your web page. Which won't look like a generic wordpress.

          Almost free money since you have to go to work anyhow. The cost is 6 months of your time during which your projects will still be making passive income. If they fail with after 6 month of absence are they really passive long tail income.
    Plus if your paid off your credit card you could get a card that pays you a bunch of airline miles so you can fly around for free once you retire. Of course that's a waste of time unless you're paying off your balance every single month.

    Hurry! Sell your silver this instant and pay off your credit card!! It's not too late!

  75. Birdy num num by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Birdy num num

  76. Re: Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not free I've made or saved thousands of dollars following the advice that I've given you over the past year. As I said earlier internet laughingstocks have exaggerated version of everyone's normal every day problems.

    Hurry! Sell your silver now and unlock hundreds of dollars a month in income you'd have to blow paying your credit cards plus all of the benefits and cash back you could be earning. Please! Start studying right now! Why are you arguing with me when you could be studying for your Microsoft cert?
    It's not too late but every day is today's dollar in the toilet and some undetermined number of future dollars.

  77. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  78. Re: Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where the fuck do you think you are creimer if not on Slashdot?


    MODDOWN! ; creimer bullshit sock puppet post!

    Creimy Dumpty sat on the wall,
    Creimy Dumpty had a great fall.
    All the king's horses
    And all the king's men
    Couldn't put Creimy Dumpty
    Together again.

    Creimy-Dumpty official video by CVS (435M views, 12M subscribers):
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Chris: here is an IQ test for you: please tell us what is the difference between the first half and the second half of the video?

    P.S. That video is really funny anyway, it's like watching you stumbling over and over again. Of course, with 435,000,000+ views and 12,000,000+ subscribers, it is in a different ball park than the one you are used to be into.

  79. Re: Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STFU you fat retarded pachyderm!

    creimer is a dumb fuck failing over and over again! creimer channel is losing subscribers and now gets 10 views a day with a total with 50 published videos! That's 0.2 view a day by video! Wow creimer! what a passive income retirement strategy!

    Now, talk about butthurt creimer! :)

    Creimy Dumpty sat on the wall,
    Creimy Dumpty had a great fall.
    All the king's horses
    And all the king's men
    Couldn't put Creimy Dumpty
    Together again.

    Creimy-Dumpty official video by CVS (435M views, 12M subscribers):
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Chris: here is an IQ test for you: please tell us what is the difference between the first half and the second half of the video?

    P.S. That video is really funny anyway, it's like watching you stumbling over and over again. Of course, with 435,000,000+ views and 12,000,000+ subscribers, it is in a different ball park than the one you are used to be into.

  80. Re:Thanks to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Less smelly than you, you borderline homeless idiot!

  81. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion