Multitouch? None, but that's splitting hairs. There have been all-touchscreen phones going back to PalmOS days and one of the early Android concepts was an all-touchscreen phone.
How about a well-written rebuttal/criticism like eldavojohn did below this post?
Because they've been tried and don't seem to work on him. You know how many times people have busted his "iPhone was TEH FIRST EVAR all-touchscreen phone and all Androids looked like Blackberries before that" post, yet he continued to post the same shit and will do so again given the opportunity?
I've seen a library that contains books which contain *every single law* for a small country. That was quite a few years ago, but from what I remember the area containing these books was about 120x50ft, and had shelves going most of the way around the walls of the room (except for a roughly 30ft. wide entrance hall and a window on one of the 50ft. sides) and back-to-back shelving going down the middle of the room 15ft high jam-packed with books.
It had a 2nd floor with bookshelves in the walls too that made it look really impressive but IIRC the actual law books were just in the downstairs area.
You'd think so but he's just a rabid Apple fanboy. His real name's Matt Deatheridge, a supposedly grown man who spends this much of his time defending a company he is a fan of, and relentlessly bashing one of their competitors, Google.
Well it's quite simple, if Monsanto releases dangerous chemicals over a town, the residents will boycott the Monsanto chemicals they were never buying, and when news of this boycott gets to the megacorps using these chemicals, they will stop using them and the shareholders will absorb the higher operating costs out of the goodness of their hearts, then Monsanto will go out of business.
And terrorists thought that a $20k plastic shell with blinkenlights on it was a bomb detector. But then, so did the security people. Two placebos are better than one!
Why set your goals so low? You need to aim for the moon!
I am now setting a goal to get in a foursome with Scarlett Johansson, Mila Kunis and Natalie Portman (hot grits optional), and get them to each bring me a supercar as a gift, before lunch. I figure I should be laid by a good looking woman and the owner of at least a high-end sports car before the night's out.
Definitely true with commercial stuff but I wouldn't say it's true with FOSS. I mean look at the number of Gnome2 forks out now, and Firefox's interface is a total non-issue IMO, there is nothing to whine about. Non-default settings are just a few clicks away.
So you'd prefer many human deaths, oceanic mass extinction and living in sealed dome environments to being more eco-friendly, and call anyone who thinks being more eco-friendly is a better solution a stupid alarmist.
Maybe you should lock yourself in a room of pure CO2. After all, carbon is life itself, and I guarantee you no stupid alarmists will follow you in.
Last time it was this warm we didn't have a massive modern civilization to support.
If you're not worried about warming at all - say you live somewhere that will still have a secure food supply and won't be at any risk from harsher weather, and you have a FYGM attitude - maybe you should be worried about ocean acidification. Allowing runaway fossil carbon release because you don't personally mind the heat isn't even a viable option.
Slashdot Mirror
...which could be any of the various touchscreen-only PalmOS devices of the early/mid 2000s.
Multitouch? None, but that's splitting hairs. There have been all-touchscreen phones going back to PalmOS days and one of the early Android concepts was an all-touchscreen phone.
How about a well-written rebuttal/criticism like eldavojohn did below this post?
Because they've been tried and don't seem to work on him. You know how many times people have busted his "iPhone was TEH FIRST EVAR all-touchscreen phone and all Androids looked like Blackberries before that" post, yet he continued to post the same shit and will do so again given the opportunity?
I've seen a library that contains books which contain *every single law* for a small country. That was quite a few years ago, but from what I remember the area containing these books was about 120x50ft, and had shelves going most of the way around the walls of the room (except for a roughly 30ft. wide entrance hall and a window on one of the 50ft. sides) and back-to-back shelving going down the middle of the room 15ft high jam-packed with books.
It had a 2nd floor with bookshelves in the walls too that made it look really impressive but IIRC the actual law books were just in the downstairs area.
I was thinking the same thing as I wrote that.
You'd think so but he's just a rabid Apple fanboy. His real name's Matt Deatheridge, a supposedly grown man who spends this much of his time defending a company he is a fan of, and relentlessly bashing one of their competitors, Google.
I think I fit all of the behaviors mentioned here :-(
Applies even more to politicians than it does to the average joe.
Well it's quite simple, if Monsanto releases dangerous chemicals over a town, the residents will boycott the Monsanto chemicals they were never buying, and when news of this boycott gets to the megacorps using these chemicals, they will stop using them and the shareholders will absorb the higher operating costs out of the goodness of their hearts, then Monsanto will go out of business.
Interesting, I'd buy that just to mess around with it if I had the money.
Unless those processing fees are from donating money to a leak site. That money's no good.
To a tree a freak fire IS "natural causes." Just as being eaten by lions is "natural causes" to a zebra.
On one hand one of the oldest trees in the world is no more, but on the other hand a Senator died in a fire...
Jeez a married guy can't give dating advice?
Mod parent up!
And terrorists thought that a $20k plastic shell with blinkenlights on it was a bomb detector. But then, so did the security people. Two placebos are better than one!
Instead of the Laughing Man you just make yourself the Good Looking Man.
Richard Hammond recommends going for the ugly chick right off the bat, that way you leave with a girl and your friends go home alone :-P
Why set your goals so low? You need to aim for the moon!
I am now setting a goal to get in a foursome with Scarlett Johansson, Mila Kunis and Natalie Portman (hot grits optional), and get them to each bring me a supercar as a gift, before lunch. I figure I should be laid by a good looking woman and the owner of at least a high-end sports car before the night's out.
That's because this story was submitted by bonch, real name Matt Deatheridge, a rabid Apple fanboy and pathological Google hater.
Definitely true with commercial stuff but I wouldn't say it's true with FOSS. I mean look at the number of Gnome2 forks out now, and Firefox's interface is a total non-issue IMO, there is nothing to whine about. Non-default settings are just a few clicks away.
So you'd prefer many human deaths, oceanic mass extinction and living in sealed dome environments to being more eco-friendly, and call anyone who thinks being more eco-friendly is a better solution a stupid alarmist.
Maybe you should lock yourself in a room of pure CO2. After all, carbon is life itself, and I guarantee you no stupid alarmists will follow you in.
Last time it was this warm we didn't have a massive modern civilization to support.
If you're not worried about warming at all - say you live somewhere that will still have a secure food supply and won't be at any risk from harsher weather, and you have a FYGM attitude - maybe you should be worried about ocean acidification. Allowing runaway fossil carbon release because you don't personally mind the heat isn't even a viable option.
...when in reality the average Facebook profile is worth -$8.
Everybody put on your silly glasses and get drunk!