No, I don't think it was his personality and loose talk that kept some of his supporters silent. It was not wanting to put up with the shit storm that might follow an show of support.
No that's what a bunch of self-important media persons claimed a year ago. Once Clinton was the obvious future-nominee, many people secretly applied that statement to the Democrats.
Richer precincts are more likely to have e-voting machines. Richer precincts are also more likely to lean Republican.
Wait a minute. I thought that the college educated people all voted for Clinton, and the poor uneducated people voted for Trump. Not to mention how many of the ultra-rich are major liberal backers.
There's another fallacy that someone thinks that because something isn't mentioned, it never happened. I have been in accidents, and have stated before I am not the safest driver. However, I have never been in an accident caused by using my phone. Also, hands-free isn't much different from hands-on, because the attention is still not on driving.
I also think there are a lot of people who are in the "I would never vote for Trump" crowd, because they don't want to be associated with some of his more bizarre stances, who secretly voted for Trump when no one was looking.
Like all the employees at Grubhub, who were told to quit if they voted for Trump. It's no wonder milions of people didn't publicly voice support for Trump before the election.
Note: ELO calibration can be deliberately "miscalibrated" to make the touch offset in any particular direction.
I've accidentally done that with a touch screen. Started the calibration routine on an unfamiliar unit. The first cross to press appeared in the corner instead of the middle like I was expecting. In the rush to move my finger 'up and left', I hit the screen along the way. It saved that bad calibration automatically, and I had a hell of a time getting back into it to fix it.
No you can't. By time you get to the third one, it's trying to count on the space between your fingers, and it never registers that instance.:^)
I support Crestron devices as well, and rarely have to calibrate the screens. I've seen others need more attention though. Love the ones that need you to press the "Calibrate Now" button, where it won't see that press correctly to do it.
It also makes sense to do something he doesn't suggest, which is to break down some of the electronic voting machines and inspect the code for malware (he only suggests comparing the paper trail to the electronic count, not looking at the machines that don't have a paper trail.)
The thing for me is that I voted on a paper ballot, which then went into a machine that counted my votes. I have no idea if that machine "switched" any of my choices, or if it recorded each one accurately. There were reports of that happening at places, so this isn't much different than using individual electronic voting machines.
Wow, great response. Maybe your next one will be based on our world. That world being the one I personally remember happening while I was in the military with Clinton as my Commander in Chief.
If disgust with the current crisis depresses women's votes in November, we will see an anti-women's rights majority in Congress roll back the gains for women of the past 30 years," said a joint statement released Thursday by 15 feminist and civil rights organizations.
The initial public reaction of feminists and other women's advocates to President Clinton's latest trouble can most charitably be described as restrained. They have a problem:
How do you defend a man whose relations with individual women, at least in some cases, are widely believed to have been irresponsible, disrespectful, exploitive and profoundly destructive?
And yet how do you attack a President with the best record ever on issues related to women?
Throughout Clinton's dealing with the sexual harassment lawsuit filed by Paula Jones and more recently with allegations that he had sex with Lewinsky, a former White House intern, women generally have supported him, and leaders of liberal women's groups have remained neutral on, if not sympathetic to, his plight.
Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.) complained yesterday about what has been "the deafening silence" of women's organizations after their criticism of Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas and then-Sen. Bob Packwood (R-Ore.) in recent years.
With the various issues those articles bring up, the recurring theme is what I pointed out: the feminists are happy supporting a sexual predator and accused rapist, as long as he supports abortion.
Not effective enough. Remove all seatbelts and airbags, then install a solid spike on the steering wheel. On every car. Within a year the problem will have weeded itself out.
I don't mind portrait mode, as much as I hate that they always show the full-height video with a wider zoom of it filling the rest of the screen. Just show the video with a black background so I can watch it without the distraction of movement all around it.
I've had to make three trips across state in the last week, about 3 hours each way, on local roads and state highway routes. I interacted with my phone a lot along the way, from the map to the music to a couple phone calls and incoming texts.
I also interacted with the radio, AC/heater controls, bottle of Coke/Mt Dew, and snacks. I can even say I interacted with other cars as we had to navigate around accidents on at least three occasions.
My viewpoint is that if you can't operate you vehicle safely while making limited use of your smartphone, you can't operate it safely while not using your smartphone.
Just because President Obama said that doesn't make it reality. Alternatively, Obama could have the Justice Department file formal charges against Snowden, and then pardon him in response.
In reality, Obama doesn't give a shit about Snowden. Snowden did his part of exposing how evil the US is, and now he's forgotten about. He is no longer the "useful" part of being an idiot.
Are the feminazis still pushing sexist nonsense like this ? After what the electorate told them at the last election ?
I think what the election told feminists was that you can be on tape as admitting to abusing women and still get voted in as president?
We've known for years that the feminists are happy supporting a sexual predator and accused rapist, as long as he supports abortion.
For all the outrage over someone talking dirty, as if the liberals want us to go back to the 1950's morality codes, one particular part of that conversation has been overlooked. Trump said "And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.", followed by ""Grab 'em by the pussy, you can do anything."
If Trump had been running as the pro-choice Democratic nominee, and the tape had been revealed by his ultra-conservative Republican rival Ted Cruz, the liberal's analysis of this would be how liberated we are sexually that women have the power of choosing which men they let touch their sacred vaginas.
The National Organization of Women would have worked with Google, Twitter, and Facebook to create a pictogram and emoticon of it to support their candidate.
And, once again, for the record, I didn't support or vote for Trump. I just hate the blatant hypocrisy surrounding that clip.
My grandmother used to keep a big wooden barrel that she'd put in the droppings she'd scoop up from the chickens. Then she let it fill with rain water. She had a saucepan by it, and she'd fertilize her big garden with the resulting water at the top. We called it manure tea. She was known for her gardening prowess, and raised 8 healthy strapping kids by herself during the depression. We did have a rigid rule about washing the veggies for sure.
What she didn't tell you was that, like Achilles, when you were born she held each of you by the heel and dipped you in the rain barrel. Made you strong and healthy.
"The water problem lies in the fact that it takes all the fresh water that a cow drinks, plus all the water used to irrigate the 10-40 pounds of feed (for each pound of meat), plus the loss of fresh water in the supply that is polluted with their sewage."
Which is the reason why the water use per pound of beef is absurd. The water is double and triple counted. There really shouldn't be much water pollution from the living cows. The greatest water usage absurdity is including the amount of water used to grow grain for the cow feed. The vast majority of grain producing fields in the US are NOT irrigated. The water falls from the sky directly on the field. Counting rain as water use for beef leads to the absurdity where one can measure available water flow in an area and determine that the cows in that area are using more water than is actually available. Using rainfall upon grain fields as a number to add to the usage figures is an obvious and dishonest shock tactic. I believe that more reasonable methods would still give numbers that support the idea that animal food is inefficient. Having water use figures that are absurd undermines efforts to develop consensus about the inefficiency of animal food sources.
This is the best argument on this topic. I'm fine with eating meat every day, but I would also be fine with going meatless a few days a week. But lying about water usage to make it seem catastrophic is not going to make me change my ways.
The problem is indeed growing cows for food, no matter how it's done. If people stop eating meat and instead ate the vegetables fed to the animals,
That's just it. Very few "vegetables" are eaten by cows. Most of their diet is grass while in pasture, hay over the winter, and grain when fattening them up for slaughter. Grass and corn grow very well with little help beyond planting and limited watering. I grew up on a vegetable farm. The corn rows took very little maintenance, but the juicy vegetables like tomatoes and cucumbers took a lot of time and water.
The studies that say beef needs 1000+ gallons of water per pound, while vegetables only need 100-500, don't take into consideration that the cows get most of that water from eating grass in their pasture and drinking from ponds in the pasture. Water for vegetables is mostly coming from a well or dammed river.
If you switched all acreage currently growing field corn for cows, and instead planted all the various vegetables, you would need to use a lot more water to irrigate them, and a lot more labor to tend to them.
You must be unaware that the current administration is pushing for the these backdoors as well, and the current president is a Democrat. In addition, District Attorney Cyrus Vance is a Democrat, whose father served as Secretary of State for President Carter, and lower offices under Kennedy and Johnson.
You should realize these issues are just from the political party you love to hate.
Slashdot Mirror
No, I don't think it was his personality and loose talk that kept some of his supporters silent. It was not wanting to put up with the shit storm that might follow an show of support.
Obviously, vaginas have to learn coding by touch, not sound.
He didn't say "highly segregated neighborhoods in NY". He said " the blackest black neighborhood in Chiraq", which I'm sure is a reference to Chicago.
Tolerance ends when your ideas and actions seek to harm innocent people.
You mean harmful actions like bankrupting someone because they don't want to bake a cake or arrange flowers?
That is so meta, it's spooky.
captcha: spooky
Damn, that's weird.
So all those people across the country destroying property are not Democrats? Nor are all the people signing petitions to turn electors against Trump?
I voted for Jill Stein, not Trump, but the hypocrisy from the left is making me glad Trump won over Hillary.
No that's what a bunch of self-important media persons claimed a year ago. Once Clinton was the obvious future-nominee, many people secretly applied that statement to the Democrats.
Now we know which side had the better intuition.
Richer precincts are more likely to have e-voting machines. Richer precincts are also more likely to lean Republican.
Wait a minute. I thought that the college educated people all voted for Clinton, and the poor uneducated people voted for Trump. Not to mention how many of the ultra-rich are major liberal backers.
There's another fallacy that someone thinks that because something isn't mentioned, it never happened. I have been in accidents, and have stated before I am not the safest driver. However, I have never been in an accident caused by using my phone. Also, hands-free isn't much different from hands-on, because the attention is still not on driving.
I also think there are a lot of people who are in the "I would never vote for Trump" crowd, because they don't want to be associated with some of his more bizarre stances, who secretly voted for Trump when no one was looking.
Like all the employees at Grubhub, who were told to quit if they voted for Trump. It's no wonder milions of people didn't publicly voice support for Trump before the election.
Note: ELO calibration can be deliberately "miscalibrated" to make the touch offset in any particular direction.
I've accidentally done that with a touch screen. Started the calibration routine on an unfamiliar unit. The first cross to press appeared in the corner instead of the middle like I was expecting. In the rush to move my finger 'up and left', I hit the screen along the way. It saved that bad calibration automatically, and I had a hell of a time getting back into it to fix it.
No you can't. By time you get to the third one, it's trying to count on the space between your fingers, and it never registers that instance. :^)
I support Crestron devices as well, and rarely have to calibrate the screens. I've seen others need more attention though. Love the ones that need you to press the "Calibrate Now" button, where it won't see that press correctly to do it.
It also makes sense to do something he doesn't suggest, which is to break down some of the electronic voting machines and inspect the code for malware (he only suggests comparing the paper trail to the electronic count, not looking at the machines that don't have a paper trail.)
The thing for me is that I voted on a paper ballot, which then went into a machine that counted my votes. I have no idea if that machine "switched" any of my choices, or if it recorded each one accurately. There were reports of that happening at places, so this isn't much different than using individual electronic voting machines.
Wow, great response. Maybe your next one will be based on our world. That world being the one I personally remember happening while I was in the military with Clinton as my Commander in Chief.
Here are few examples of how Clinton's scandals were thought of back then:
http://articles.latimes.com/19...
If disgust with the current crisis depresses women's votes in November, we will see an anti-women's rights majority in Congress roll back the gains for women of the past 30 years," said a joint statement released Thursday by 15 feminist and civil rights organizations.
http://www.nytimes.com/1998/01...
The initial public reaction of feminists and other women's advocates to President Clinton's latest trouble can most charitably be described as restrained. They have a problem:
How do you defend a man whose relations with individual women, at least in some cases, are widely believed to have been irresponsible, disrespectful, exploitive and profoundly destructive?
And yet how do you attack a President with the best record ever on issues related to women?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...
Throughout Clinton's dealing with the sexual harassment lawsuit filed by Paula Jones and more recently with allegations that he had sex with Lewinsky, a former White House intern, women generally have supported him, and leaders of liberal women's groups have remained neutral on, if not sympathetic to, his plight.
Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.) complained yesterday about what has been "the deafening silence" of women's organizations after their criticism of Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas and then-Sen. Bob Packwood (R-Ore.) in recent years.
With the various issues those articles bring up, the recurring theme is what I pointed out: the feminists are happy supporting a sexual predator and accused rapist, as long as he supports abortion.
Not effective enough. Remove all seatbelts and airbags, then install a solid spike on the steering wheel. On every car. Within a year the problem will have weeded itself out.
I don't mind portrait mode, as much as I hate that they always show the full-height video with a wider zoom of it filling the rest of the screen. Just show the video with a black background so I can watch it without the distraction of movement all around it.
I've had to make three trips across state in the last week, about 3 hours each way, on local roads and state highway routes. I interacted with my phone a lot along the way, from the map to the music to a couple phone calls and incoming texts.
I also interacted with the radio, AC/heater controls, bottle of Coke/Mt Dew, and snacks. I can even say I interacted with other cars as we had to navigate around accidents on at least three occasions.
My viewpoint is that if you can't operate you vehicle safely while making limited use of your smartphone, you can't operate it safely while not using your smartphone.
Just because President Obama said that doesn't make it reality. Alternatively, Obama could have the Justice Department file formal charges against Snowden, and then pardon him in response.
In reality, Obama doesn't give a shit about Snowden. Snowden did his part of exposing how evil the US is, and now he's forgotten about. He is no longer the "useful" part of being an idiot.
Are the feminazis still pushing sexist nonsense like this ? After what the electorate told them at the last election ?
I think what the election told feminists was that you can be on tape as admitting to abusing women and still get voted in as president?
We've known for years that the feminists are happy supporting a sexual predator and accused rapist, as long as he supports abortion.
For all the outrage over someone talking dirty, as if the liberals want us to go back to the 1950's morality codes, one particular part of that conversation has been overlooked. Trump said "And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.", followed by ""Grab 'em by the pussy, you can do anything."
If Trump had been running as the pro-choice Democratic nominee, and the tape had been revealed by his ultra-conservative Republican rival Ted Cruz, the liberal's analysis of this would be how liberated we are sexually that women have the power of choosing which men they let touch their sacred vaginas.
The National Organization of Women would have worked with Google, Twitter, and Facebook to create a pictogram and emoticon of it to support their candidate.
And, once again, for the record, I didn't support or vote for Trump. I just hate the blatant hypocrisy surrounding that clip.
My grandmother used to keep a big wooden barrel that she'd put in the droppings she'd scoop up from the chickens. Then she let it fill with rain water. She had a saucepan by it, and she'd fertilize her big garden with the resulting water at the top. We called it manure tea. She was known for her gardening prowess, and raised 8 healthy strapping kids by herself during the depression. We did have a rigid rule about washing the veggies for sure.
What she didn't tell you was that, like Achilles, when you were born she held each of you by the heel and dipped you in the rain barrel. Made you strong and healthy.
"The water problem lies in the fact that it takes all the fresh water that a cow drinks, plus all the water used to irrigate the 10-40 pounds of feed (for each pound of meat), plus the loss of fresh water in the supply that is polluted with their sewage."
Which is the reason why the water use per pound of beef is absurd. The water is double and triple counted. There really shouldn't be much water pollution from the living cows. The greatest water usage absurdity is including the amount of water used to grow grain for the cow feed. The vast majority of grain producing fields in the US are NOT irrigated. The water falls from the sky directly on the field. Counting rain as water use for beef leads to the absurdity where one can measure available water flow in an area and determine that the cows in that area are using more water than is actually available. Using rainfall upon grain fields as a number to add to the usage figures is an obvious and dishonest shock tactic. I believe that more reasonable methods would still give numbers that support the idea that animal food is inefficient. Having water use figures that are absurd undermines efforts to develop consensus about the inefficiency of animal food sources.
This is the best argument on this topic. I'm fine with eating meat every day, but I would also be fine with going meatless a few days a week. But lying about water usage to make it seem catastrophic is not going to make me change my ways.
The problem is indeed growing cows for food, no matter how it's done. If people stop eating meat and instead ate the vegetables fed to the animals,
That's just it. Very few "vegetables" are eaten by cows. Most of their diet is grass while in pasture, hay over the winter, and grain when fattening them up for slaughter. Grass and corn grow very well with little help beyond planting and limited watering. I grew up on a vegetable farm. The corn rows took very little maintenance, but the juicy vegetables like tomatoes and cucumbers took a lot of time and water.
The studies that say beef needs 1000+ gallons of water per pound, while vegetables only need 100-500, don't take into consideration that the cows get most of that water from eating grass in their pasture and drinking from ponds in the pasture. Water for vegetables is mostly coming from a well or dammed river.
If you switched all acreage currently growing field corn for cows, and instead planted all the various vegetables, you would need to use a lot more water to irrigate them, and a lot more labor to tend to them.
Your name is probably closer to "Thomas McGee" than to "Muhammad 'Abd al-Hussein".
You must be unaware that the current administration is pushing for the these backdoors as well, and the current president is a Democrat. In addition, District Attorney Cyrus Vance is a Democrat, whose father served as Secretary of State for President Carter, and lower offices under Kennedy and Johnson.
You should realize these issues are just from the political party you love to hate.
First, I don't know Tim Crook. Maybe he deserved to die, and I don't want to find his killer.
Second, if I'm murdered, either I won't be able to find out who killed me, or I will already know without hacking an iphone.