Comparing Fukishima to Chernobyl is ridiculous. Chernobyl basically had no safety systems, was operated in the worst way possible, and the disaster and following cleanup were done in such a way that it would be hard to conceive of a worse outcome. The amount of radiation released in the 1st second of Chernobyls overload that lead to the eventual meltdown (and killed everyone operating it at the time) released more radiation by several orders of magnitude than the entire failure at Fukishima.
And Modern reactors CAN NOT melt down. It's physically impossible. But we're not building those due to the lobbying efforts of environmental groups. What should be done is a thorough review of existing reactor designs, and the government should fund upgrades or replacements of these older, more dangerous reactors. We then need to move on to more stable, efficient and reliable reactors.
Our next step is space based solar arrays. But those are at least 50 years off. So we need nuclear for now.
Lets keep in mind what The Westboro Baptist Church is and what they are say.
Firstly, they are a single family of lawyers lead by their patriarch Fred Phelps. They've garnered so much notoriety because they are lawyers and use their knowledge of the legal system to research and plan their events so they are barely within the legal limits of the locality they are in. This is not an organized church, it's almost entirely a single family and their ideology is dictated to them by a single man.
Secondly, the "speech" they are shouting at childrens funerals is specific. They want to remove the rights of others to speak, be free, or even live. They want homosexuality to be illegal and want to imprison of even kill those found committing homosexual acts.
There are limits to free speech in every country in the world. Including this one. The government may not be able to stop them from speaking, but the government also can not protect them from the repercussions of their hate speech. I find it rather surprising no ones burned their houses down yet.
And if 20 different companies file major lawsuits with rooms full of lawyers each, all at the same time? It's hard to win a court case when you can't show up to court because you can't afford to put gas in your car.
Answered my own question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_in_Japan Looks like MSG wont do you any good. But if anything will get you out of your funk and keep you from offing yourself, my burger recipe is it.
Speaking of which, are suicide rates lower in Japan? According to my buddies wife, who lived there for a while, it's actually hard to find regular salt because almost everyone uses MSG exclusively. I also use MSG almost exclusively instead of table salt. Not because it tastes better or anything, I just like to freak people out when I cook for them and they want to know what I put in it. As soon as I whip out the MSG their eyes get big "I thought that was poisonous!!!" lol
FYI: MSG + Onion powder + fresh ground white and black pepper mixed in with ground beef is the ultimate recipe for burgers.
Wow... way to spout nonsense without having any corporate IT experience what-so-ever. I don't have the power to decide if we use their service or not. I am the lead admin for a SINGLE service we have with them so I get to sit in on the meetings. We have dozens of services with oracle. The service I support is far more than just a database. It's used in-house by over 130 different departments and has been built up and refined over the past 10 years. Moving from it, to something else would be an enormous effort. We started the process over a year ago when I became the lead as I saw this as a huge problem. Oracle can see what we're doing, and they know how corporate environments work so they are putting the screws to us. If we lost the service it wouldn't put us out of business by any means, but it would suck pretty badly for a while.
If I were the king of the business I worked for and got to make all of the decisions with an unlimited budget, we'd be using 100% open source or things written in-house all hosted at our own data center. (yes we have our own, very large, data center) But I'm not the king and our budget is not unlimited. Instead we are held hostage by choices made by people that don't even work there anymore.
Having been on the other side of this policy, I'd have to disagree with your sentiment. It's cloud services... So they have you by the short hairs. When the renewal comes up and they CHANGE the contract... as a customer you really only have one weapon, and that's to withhold the check. "We're not paying you until this contract isn't screwing us" and they they use this clause... "We're going to shut off your service if you don't agree to these new terms and pay up" And I'm not talking about withholding the pay for the service you have right now. Usually these contracts are signed in October or so for the following year... and they will threaten to turn off your service NOW if you don't agree and abide by their new "offer" for next year. They argue that you must draw up terms of disconnection or sign a new deal... if you fail to do either you're in violation of their agreement because you need to give proper notice... Oracles a bitch when it comes to contracts.
Ah yes, the faulty "Union workers don't make that much" argument. Unions protect long standing members. I've been a member of several trade unions and the story is always the same. If you are "new" member (less than 5 to 10 years in) the union could give a shit less about you. Unions are all about seniority and protect long standing members. The autoworkers union doesn't care about the food workers union, so if you move from one to the other they don't care what happens to you. So the unions setup deals with the employers where newhires don't get paid all that much, but once you've been on the job for a while all the benefits start kicking in. Who are the union leaders? The senior employees. So what's happening is the Union leaders are bought off by the employer at the expense of the new hire. But in the past twenty years or so, these union leaders have left people that were only in the unions for a short period of time with a bad taste in their mouth. What good was that union anyway? And the employers have exploited this and their past agreements by getting rid of as many "Senior" union people as possible and replacing them with new hires who are not so high up on the unions priority lists.
Then we get to the government employee unions. Teachers in particular. They get paid based on education. That's fucking stupid. They absolutely refuse to accept raises based on performance. The Washington DC school system even offered to give bonuses, on top of, not instead of, education based raises to those that performed better. We're talking FREE extra money... and the union walked out. No way. Why? Because they don't want to set a president. If there were merit based incentives in a single school, it would clearly work... and spread across the country. God forbid teachers that have built their career on getting multiple doctorates in English so they can teach 16yr olds how to read Charles dickens be expected to actually help those students become better readers rather than appreciate what they consider great literature. But those same teachers have been there the longest and are the highest up in the food chain for the union. At the expense of all the other teacher... even the children... they WILL get paid irrelevant of their success rate.
As a non-pedestrian, I think all you pedestrians are sick and deserve every windshield you get smacked into. Fuck you and your god damned walking. The number one cause of pedestrian accidents is fucking pedestrians setting foot in the road. Stop walking in the road, and I'll stop running your stupid ass over.
In times like this, it's easy to agree with you. I have a 5yr old, and things like this are terrifying. What kind of world is he growing up in? There is something seriously wrong with our society that things like this happen. But are guns the problem? More children are killed every year riding it cars than are killed by guns. More kids are killed playing school sports... Should we ban those as well? Are we not addressing those issues because those tragedies only happen to 1 or 2 children at a time even though the cumulative total is far far worse?
In the end, we want to take power away from those of us that choose to commit evil. That's understandable. A gun is a force magnifier. It made what this disturbed person chose to do, easier. But the fact of the matter is, as long as we continue not to address the real problem here: His choice to commit this crime, we will still have these sorts of tragedies regardless of the weapons used or how difficult it was to get them.
In the past an individual like this would have been recognized and dealt with. Unfortunately often treatment involved locking them away or forcing them to undergo treatments that were clearly violations of human rights. Over the years numerous court cases have lead us to a place where someone with a mental disorder and no concept of right and wrong is treated with the same, sometimes even more rights than a mentally healthy person. This needs to end. I don't like the government getting involved in anything... especially healthcare, but one of the presidents primary goals is bringing healthcare to more people. He can start here. We can almost universally agree that this is a tax we'll pay. Find these people, give them free treatment. Legislate to help force humane treatment on them when they refuse it. Amend the constitution if we have to.
In the end, had there been stricter gun control, or even if guns were illegal the person that did this would have still done it. Maybe he would have gotten the guns illegally, or used a knife and only gotten half as many kids. Or maybe a bomb and it would have been worse. Either way it would have still happened. There was a person in serious psychological pain that wanted to show us their rage... that they were angry than anyone has ever been. The only way to do that is to up the body count, move on to kids... it will continue like this until we find a way to identify and treat these people ahead of time.
If you watch all 3 movies in the "Extended directors cut blah blah blah" or whatever, I think they come out to be about 12hrs or so. How much longer did you want them to be? Maybe they could have been made into 9 movies? I can't imagine they would have been nearly as successful though.
iPhones are MADE in China for fucks sake. So they made them there, shipped them all the way here, and then we say "don't export these Chinese made gadgets back to the country where they were made?!?" Any export restrictions involved here are about pricing things differently in different markets. By being their own store, Apple can maximize profits but choosing where and for how much they sell their product without fear of competition... unless people start buying iPhones in one market and moving them to another... so they lobby congress to ban exports of their own product, even though they sell the same product in both markets. I for one hope buying apple products continues this trend of Tazzering, they get what they deserve.
You're a fool. You think your IP is the only way to ID you? lol
When you visit a site that's trying to track you, you give them TONS of information. Specifically, if you look above, your machine name for gods sake. But lets say you were smart enough to get around that... You're still sending your browser type, version information, OS, OS version, fonts installed, screen resolution... and on and on and on. Any one, or several of those pieces of information is rather useless.. BUT... combined they form a unique key which can be used to identify you.
The site now flags you with an ID number. That's you... period. If the site is co-operating with one of the large data sharing services, and they most definitely are, they then pass all of this identifying information on to that site. Now if you log into a different site, they ID you via all of this data, and find your ID number. They now know all of your browsing habits on any site that is also sharing data on that service. So they can serve up adds to target you (which was their goal) Now, at least they don't know your real name right? But that all changes the second you fill out a form. This is why sites have contests, forums, free offers etc... they want you to sign up. Once they have your email address it's over. Not only do they get your current and future browsing history they go back in time and relate all your past browsing activity to that email address. Then they cross reference that email address against all of their partners and affiliates for even more data.
Everything you have ever done on the internet can be, and probably already has been linked directly to you. Does TOR help? Yes... but only on sites that don't care, or aren't trying hard enough. But even those sites like to use Googles free analytics services... and guess what those services are doing...
What's your best form of protection? This may seem crazy but it's a fact... become a customer. Once you're a paying customer suddenly all sorts of legal nonsense pops in. Most privacy laws were written to protect "Customers" from companies using their billing information to harass them. They can and will still track you, but they can't share that information. And they have to ask you if they can look at your account to "improve your service" or whatever.
Most companies don't even realize they are doing this stuff. Their marketing departments buy software, have it installed... usually very few people in the company even know it's going on. The marketing department has a very narrow view of what they are doing, and don't realize the broader global implications of building a massive database of everything everyone does.
What would make more sense is to declare the whole nonsense "unenforceable" This is the equivalent of $100k fines for spitting on the sidewalk. Oh wait, spitting on the sidewalk could actually cause someone else a hardship if they stepped in it.
small rocket + net + parachute. Navy waiting underneath. Hell, put a GPS transmitter and flotation in the package and you could pretty much bring anything out of orbit you wanted to as long as it didn't have its own propulsion.
I've been on here preaching this forever. Any large website you visit is doing this. It's easy to do and a cheap service. TOR doesn't even help you. If you visit a site, they can uniquely identify you, period. They might not know exactly who you are (your name) but they don't care about that. They have your browsing habits, what you're into, and what you're likely to buy. That's all they need. I've seen these systems in action and the level of detail is amazing. You can not escape them.
Size: physical magnitude, extent, or bulk : relative or proportionate dimensions
I'd say both you and the article are correct. You're just using the word size in different context. And the space shuttle is 82tons without all the external fuel tanks and boosters.
That's not true. You can write code that can use all 3 interchangeably. I do it all the time, as my queries hit tables stored in all 3 formats and it's just way easier to go generic that try and keep your code strait between data sources. Generally if you can do MySQL then you can do everything else with ease. It's the people that have been working in an oracle shop their whole lives and they come out and work with us in the real world with dozens of mixed formats that they have to really learn how to code SQL. PLSQL and other "Fancy" versions are nice because they have little tricks that make some actions easier. But when it comes down to it, if you code it correctly you can drop the same code into any of those formats and it will return the same results. Can you write stuff in one that wont work in the other? Yes, but you don't have to do it that way. There's always a way to do it that will work in all 3, and in truth, that way is likely the best way (although maybe not the easiest).
It does. The problem is you listen to politicians too much. They tell you that some billionaires secretary is paying more in taxes than her boss... well that's not true. Her tax RATE is higher, but what she actually pays in taxes after all the credits, deductions and other stuff we poor people get, we end up paying very little federal taxes. Almost nothing actually. Where we get screwed is state taxes (depending on your state) my rates are insane. But the rich get to pick the state they "reside" in, even though they probably have houses in half a dozen states.
You could do that now. Order some uranium off of ebay, smack it with a hammer to turn it into dusts, sprinkle on the mat at the departures section so every tracks it all over the airport and watch the Chaos. Frankly, I'm surprised it hasn't already happened.
The problem is that most were build 30 to 40 years ago and environmental protesters stop just about every plan to build or upgrade them. They're basically trying to make their own predictions come true. Modern reactor designs simply can not meltdown. It's physically impossible, natural disaster or not. We need to be replacing our old reactors with these new designs... sadly we are not.
Slashdot Mirror
Comparing Fukishima to Chernobyl is ridiculous. Chernobyl basically had no safety systems, was operated in the worst way possible, and the disaster and following cleanup were done in such a way that it would be hard to conceive of a worse outcome. The amount of radiation released in the 1st second of Chernobyls overload that lead to the eventual meltdown (and killed everyone operating it at the time) released more radiation by several orders of magnitude than the entire failure at Fukishima.
And Modern reactors CAN NOT melt down. It's physically impossible. But we're not building those due to the lobbying efforts of environmental groups. What should be done is a thorough review of existing reactor designs, and the government should fund upgrades or replacements of these older, more dangerous reactors. We then need to move on to more stable, efficient and reliable reactors.
Our next step is space based solar arrays. But those are at least 50 years off. So we need nuclear for now.
There was a meltdown at a test reactor at a military base in Arizona back in the 50s/60s... it was very small however.
Lets keep in mind what The Westboro Baptist Church is and what they are say.
Firstly, they are a single family of lawyers lead by their patriarch Fred Phelps. They've garnered so much notoriety because they are lawyers and use their knowledge of the legal system to research and plan their events so they are barely within the legal limits of the locality they are in. This is not an organized church, it's almost entirely a single family and their ideology is dictated to them by a single man.
Secondly, the "speech" they are shouting at childrens funerals is specific. They want to remove the rights of others to speak, be free, or even live. They want homosexuality to be illegal and want to imprison of even kill those found committing homosexual acts.
There are limits to free speech in every country in the world. Including this one. The government may not be able to stop them from speaking, but the government also can not protect them from the repercussions of their hate speech. I find it rather surprising no ones burned their houses down yet.
How is this even remotely a security hole? Much less a "Huge" one? Owners can gain root access to their own device? God forbid!
And if 20 different companies file major lawsuits with rooms full of lawyers each, all at the same time? It's hard to win a court case when you can't show up to court because you can't afford to put gas in your car.
Answered my own question:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_in_Japan
Looks like MSG wont do you any good. But if anything will get you out of your funk and keep you from offing yourself, my burger recipe is it.
Speaking of which, are suicide rates lower in Japan? According to my buddies wife, who lived there for a while, it's actually hard to find regular salt because almost everyone uses MSG exclusively. I also use MSG almost exclusively instead of table salt. Not because it tastes better or anything, I just like to freak people out when I cook for them and they want to know what I put in it. As soon as I whip out the MSG their eyes get big "I thought that was poisonous!!!" lol
FYI: MSG + Onion powder + fresh ground white and black pepper mixed in with ground beef is the ultimate recipe for burgers.
Wow... way to spout nonsense without having any corporate IT experience what-so-ever. I don't have the power to decide if we use their service or not. I am the lead admin for a SINGLE service we have with them so I get to sit in on the meetings. We have dozens of services with oracle. The service I support is far more than just a database. It's used in-house by over 130 different departments and has been built up and refined over the past 10 years. Moving from it, to something else would be an enormous effort. We started the process over a year ago when I became the lead as I saw this as a huge problem. Oracle can see what we're doing, and they know how corporate environments work so they are putting the screws to us. If we lost the service it wouldn't put us out of business by any means, but it would suck pretty badly for a while.
If I were the king of the business I worked for and got to make all of the decisions with an unlimited budget, we'd be using 100% open source or things written in-house all hosted at our own data center. (yes we have our own, very large, data center) But I'm not the king and our budget is not unlimited. Instead we are held hostage by choices made by people that don't even work there anymore.
Having been on the other side of this policy, I'd have to disagree with your sentiment. It's cloud services... So they have you by the short hairs. When the renewal comes up and they CHANGE the contract... as a customer you really only have one weapon, and that's to withhold the check. "We're not paying you until this contract isn't screwing us" and they they use this clause... "We're going to shut off your service if you don't agree to these new terms and pay up" And I'm not talking about withholding the pay for the service you have right now. Usually these contracts are signed in October or so for the following year... and they will threaten to turn off your service NOW if you don't agree and abide by their new "offer" for next year. They argue that you must draw up terms of disconnection or sign a new deal... if you fail to do either you're in violation of their agreement because you need to give proper notice... Oracles a bitch when it comes to contracts.
Ah yes, the faulty "Union workers don't make that much" argument. Unions protect long standing members. I've been a member of several trade unions and the story is always the same. If you are "new" member (less than 5 to 10 years in) the union could give a shit less about you. Unions are all about seniority and protect long standing members. The autoworkers union doesn't care about the food workers union, so if you move from one to the other they don't care what happens to you. So the unions setup deals with the employers where newhires don't get paid all that much, but once you've been on the job for a while all the benefits start kicking in. Who are the union leaders? The senior employees. So what's happening is the Union leaders are bought off by the employer at the expense of the new hire. But in the past twenty years or so, these union leaders have left people that were only in the unions for a short period of time with a bad taste in their mouth. What good was that union anyway? And the employers have exploited this and their past agreements by getting rid of as many "Senior" union people as possible and replacing them with new hires who are not so high up on the unions priority lists.
Then we get to the government employee unions. Teachers in particular. They get paid based on education. That's fucking stupid. They absolutely refuse to accept raises based on performance. The Washington DC school system even offered to give bonuses, on top of, not instead of, education based raises to those that performed better. We're talking FREE extra money... and the union walked out. No way. Why? Because they don't want to set a president. If there were merit based incentives in a single school, it would clearly work... and spread across the country. God forbid teachers that have built their career on getting multiple doctorates in English so they can teach 16yr olds how to read Charles dickens be expected to actually help those students become better readers rather than appreciate what they consider great literature. But those same teachers have been there the longest and are the highest up in the food chain for the union. At the expense of all the other teacher... even the children... they WILL get paid irrelevant of their success rate.
Because that's how smart people make the world a better place.
As a non-pedestrian, I think all you pedestrians are sick and deserve every windshield you get smacked into. Fuck you and your god damned walking. The number one cause of pedestrian accidents is fucking pedestrians setting foot in the road. Stop walking in the road, and I'll stop running your stupid ass over.
In times like this, it's easy to agree with you. I have a 5yr old, and things like this are terrifying. What kind of world is he growing up in? There is something seriously wrong with our society that things like this happen. But are guns the problem? More children are killed every year riding it cars than are killed by guns. More kids are killed playing school sports... Should we ban those as well? Are we not addressing those issues because those tragedies only happen to 1 or 2 children at a time even though the cumulative total is far far worse?
In the end, we want to take power away from those of us that choose to commit evil. That's understandable. A gun is a force magnifier. It made what this disturbed person chose to do, easier. But the fact of the matter is, as long as we continue not to address the real problem here: His choice to commit this crime, we will still have these sorts of tragedies regardless of the weapons used or how difficult it was to get them.
In the past an individual like this would have been recognized and dealt with. Unfortunately often treatment involved locking them away or forcing them to undergo treatments that were clearly violations of human rights. Over the years numerous court cases have lead us to a place where someone with a mental disorder and no concept of right and wrong is treated with the same, sometimes even more rights than a mentally healthy person. This needs to end. I don't like the government getting involved in anything... especially healthcare, but one of the presidents primary goals is bringing healthcare to more people. He can start here. We can almost universally agree that this is a tax we'll pay. Find these people, give them free treatment. Legislate to help force humane treatment on them when they refuse it. Amend the constitution if we have to.
In the end, had there been stricter gun control, or even if guns were illegal the person that did this would have still done it. Maybe he would have gotten the guns illegally, or used a knife and only gotten half as many kids. Or maybe a bomb and it would have been worse. Either way it would have still happened. There was a person in serious psychological pain that wanted to show us their rage... that they were angry than anyone has ever been. The only way to do that is to up the body count, move on to kids... it will continue like this until we find a way to identify and treat these people ahead of time.
If you watch all 3 movies in the "Extended directors cut blah blah blah" or whatever, I think they come out to be about 12hrs or so. How much longer did you want them to be? Maybe they could have been made into 9 movies? I can't imagine they would have been nearly as successful though.
iPhones are MADE in China for fucks sake. So they made them there, shipped them all the way here, and then we say "don't export these Chinese made gadgets back to the country where they were made?!?" Any export restrictions involved here are about pricing things differently in different markets. By being their own store, Apple can maximize profits but choosing where and for how much they sell their product without fear of competition... unless people start buying iPhones in one market and moving them to another... so they lobby congress to ban exports of their own product, even though they sell the same product in both markets. I for one hope buying apple products continues this trend of Tazzering, they get what they deserve.
You're a fool. You think your IP is the only way to ID you? lol
When you visit a site that's trying to track you, you give them TONS of information. Specifically, if you look above, your machine name for gods sake. But lets say you were smart enough to get around that... You're still sending your browser type, version information, OS, OS version, fonts installed, screen resolution... and on and on and on. Any one, or several of those pieces of information is rather useless.. BUT... combined they form a unique key which can be used to identify you.
The site now flags you with an ID number. That's you... period. If the site is co-operating with one of the large data sharing services, and they most definitely are, they then pass all of this identifying information on to that site. Now if you log into a different site, they ID you via all of this data, and find your ID number. They now know all of your browsing habits on any site that is also sharing data on that service. So they can serve up adds to target you (which was their goal) Now, at least they don't know your real name right? But that all changes the second you fill out a form. This is why sites have contests, forums, free offers etc... they want you to sign up. Once they have your email address it's over. Not only do they get your current and future browsing history they go back in time and relate all your past browsing activity to that email address. Then they cross reference that email address against all of their partners and affiliates for even more data.
Everything you have ever done on the internet can be, and probably already has been linked directly to you. Does TOR help? Yes... but only on sites that don't care, or aren't trying hard enough. But even those sites like to use Googles free analytics services... and guess what those services are doing...
What's your best form of protection? This may seem crazy but it's a fact... become a customer. Once you're a paying customer suddenly all sorts of legal nonsense pops in. Most privacy laws were written to protect "Customers" from companies using their billing information to harass them. They can and will still track you, but they can't share that information. And they have to ask you if they can look at your account to "improve your service" or whatever.
Most companies don't even realize they are doing this stuff. Their marketing departments buy software, have it installed... usually very few people in the company even know it's going on. The marketing department has a very narrow view of what they are doing, and don't realize the broader global implications of building a massive database of everything everyone does.
What would make more sense is to declare the whole nonsense "unenforceable" This is the equivalent of $100k fines for spitting on the sidewalk. Oh wait, spitting on the sidewalk could actually cause someone else a hardship if they stepped in it.
small rocket + net + parachute. Navy waiting underneath. Hell, put a GPS transmitter and flotation in the package and you could pretty much bring anything out of orbit you wanted to as long as it didn't have its own propulsion.
I've been on here preaching this forever. Any large website you visit is doing this. It's easy to do and a cheap service. TOR doesn't even help you. If you visit a site, they can uniquely identify you, period. They might not know exactly who you are (your name) but they don't care about that. They have your browsing habits, what you're into, and what you're likely to buy. That's all they need. I've seen these systems in action and the level of detail is amazing. You can not escape them.
Size: physical magnitude, extent, or bulk : relative or proportionate dimensions
I'd say both you and the article are correct. You're just using the word size in different context.
And the space shuttle is 82tons without all the external fuel tanks and boosters.
That's not true. You can write code that can use all 3 interchangeably. I do it all the time, as my queries hit tables stored in all 3 formats and it's just way easier to go generic that try and keep your code strait between data sources. Generally if you can do MySQL then you can do everything else with ease. It's the people that have been working in an oracle shop their whole lives and they come out and work with us in the real world with dozens of mixed formats that they have to really learn how to code SQL. PLSQL and other "Fancy" versions are nice because they have little tricks that make some actions easier. But when it comes down to it, if you code it correctly you can drop the same code into any of those formats and it will return the same results. Can you write stuff in one that wont work in the other? Yes, but you don't have to do it that way. There's always a way to do it that will work in all 3, and in truth, that way is likely the best way (although maybe not the easiest).
It does. The problem is you listen to politicians too much. They tell you that some billionaires secretary is paying more in taxes than her boss... well that's not true. Her tax RATE is higher, but what she actually pays in taxes after all the credits, deductions and other stuff we poor people get, we end up paying very little federal taxes. Almost nothing actually. Where we get screwed is state taxes (depending on your state) my rates are insane. But the rich get to pick the state they "reside" in, even though they probably have houses in half a dozen states.
actually, that probably on the horizon.
You could do that now. Order some uranium off of ebay, smack it with a hammer to turn it into dusts, sprinkle on the mat at the departures section so every tracks it all over the airport and watch the Chaos. Frankly, I'm surprised it hasn't already happened.
The problem is that most were build 30 to 40 years ago and environmental protesters stop just about every plan to build or upgrade them. They're basically trying to make their own predictions come true. Modern reactor designs simply can not meltdown. It's physically impossible, natural disaster or not. We need to be replacing our old reactors with these new designs... sadly we are not.