How much of the cryptomarket is based on trust in coinbase? It's highly centralized as it is. Tulips are more relevant to crypto than trust in proof-of-work.
True wealth of a nation is productive and human capital.
There is no significant value stored in money on a national scale, it's a means to an end... an inflationary currency is a better means to the end than a deflationary one.
If the bubble grows large enough, of course it can. Even banks and pension funds will find some indirect way to be exposed, the financial industry will find a way. The pensioners and blue collar workers who invested themselves won't be consuming much for a while.
The economy does well at low inequality and high wealth, tulip mania creates a highly unequal distribution of wealth in collapse.
Then they have the state's decision against them instead of being backed by the state's decision. Also they can't force companies into settlement with injunctions and import restrictions and trials which can drag on longer than the patent re-review. Also they will be limited to the Eastern District of Virginia to appeal in court. Also of course they still have to finish their original trial too even if they win the appeal.
So they get their time, but the old situation was much better for them.
I don't know about him, but I think women (and men, and disabled and minorities) need to earn their associations on their own power... rather than be trust into them environment by state power.
If some men want to be sexist and only hire pretty ladies, so be it. Let capitalism determine if it's a good idea. You seem to think the outcome is predetermined, are men really that superior then?
More so, this won't change anything. Anyone who thinks these algorithms won't be tweaked by the females in HR and Asian males in management to satisfy the Jewish men who own the media is silly.
Don't worry your silly little heads liberals, affirmative action won't go away...
White men program it, so it can't be fair... god fucking damn hypocritical sexist, racist twat.
PS. I have no problem with the sexist and racist part, I think everyone should have complete freedom of association, I only take exception with the hypocrisy.
On the internet you can't necessarily counter something on the same page either. Countering on some other facebook feed is no different from countering on some other web page. NYT stood by applauding when Facebook&Co caused violence en masse during the Arab spring... that shit is why I loathe liberals more than any other political group, their opinions go this way or that with emotion and peer pressure. No consistency or recognition of hypocrisy,
I disagree with libertarians, anarchists, communists... but at least they have some consistency in their thinking. Liberals are just an insane bunch of fuckers.
Only banning illegal speech when reported is a perfectly reasonable stand to take by social media companies, let the chips fall where they may. Demanding they start censoring based purely on your emotions when the outcome is stupid non-productive violence either way is insane.
Unfortunately a lot of water in the world is defacto fossil. Pumping ground water for agriculture is a dangerous habit if you don't have the money, technology and cultural sophistication to change course when you should. Look how it worked in Saudi Arabia, from desert to green back to desert, but now with fucked water tables. They got oil, so it's okay for now... but otherwise they'd be fucked.
There's only so much you can do to uplift people without just running things and reshaping their entire culture (colonization).
Give them components they can't build themselves, information how to construct the well (internet) and don't brain drain the people who can construct wells with liberal migration policies. Don't just drill a well for them, it creates dependency and laziness.
We don't know to what extent Google/Apple/facebook etc cooperate with court orders for store based attacks on individuals.
If Facebook rolls a compromised Whatsapp client on demand and Google/Apple pushes the update to individuals on court order then end to end encryption is kind of irrelevant. Telegram might be refusing to cooperate with this attack vector in Russia, whereas Facebook does not.
The "humanitarian" intervention in Libya destroyed Mali, lead to a massive spike in crime and murders which is still ravaging the country and opened the flood gates to illegal migration to Europe.
With all that in mind, do you think we should intervene in Syria?
Warmongers vs. pacifists, fascists vs. communists, polarization is nothing new. It's not so long ago that Europe still had honest to god anarchists bombing shit...
They are simply dreamers who think progress is inevitable and as such the world now has to be a better place and any significant ideological clash like in the bad old days should be impossible. Anyone with opinions different from the liberal norm must have had their mind distorted by the evil ad chasing social media. Everything is sun shine and getting better. Except global warming of course... that's the one catastrophe you are allowed to see coming.
Unfortunately white genocide, peak everything and (regional) overpopulation are bearing down on us as well. Some of us feel kind of upset about it, we'd feel upset about it without the internet too. Dark times ahead.
Autopilot with only break/steering assist to prevent collision and lane departure warning would be safer than what you have now. But you don't want to be safer, you want to be able to not look at the road.
If Tesla keeps this up statistics will catch up to them and the person killed will not be the driver using his phone... if Tesla is really unlucky it will be a roadworker/cop/fireman/ambulance-worker. Autopilot will be banned next day, stocks price will decimate and Tesla will probably go bankrupt if that happens.
It's a gamble Tesla has to take though, the ability to stare at your phone is what sells their cars.
Autopilot with only break/steering assist to prevent collision and lane departure warning would be safer than what you have now. But you don't want to be safer, you want to be able to not look at the road.
It's not in our interest to cooperate with you in that desire though, because the next firetruck a Tesla runs into might have a fireman standing next to it. It's just a matter of time before someone like you is watching his phone relying on the car to "save" your life while murdering some road worker or cop on the freeway.
People want to look away from the road for minutes at a time and Tesla sells drivers that ability. This is adding more to their bottom line than the fact their cars are electric. Break assist and lane wander warnings would accomplish the same safety features autopilot does, without crashing into firetrucks and lane dividers. If they actually get forced to make autopilot work that way, they will lose a ton of customers though. Not something they could survive, currently.
Intel has 4096 process ID's now, so that's a lot of stuff in kernel space which could get it's own process space. AMD has address space ID's, but those are meant for virtualization, don't know if they could be abused for microkernel isolation. ARM has 16 domain IDs.
The popular ISAs all allow more than the old kernel/user space division now. It's time to move on.
Slashdot Mirror
How much of the cryptomarket is based on trust in coinbase? It's highly centralized as it is. Tulips are more relevant to crypto than trust in proof-of-work.
True wealth of a nation is productive and human capital.
There is no significant value stored in money on a national scale, it's a means to an end ... an inflationary currency is a better means to the end than a deflationary one.
If the bubble grows large enough, of course it can. Even banks and pension funds will find some indirect way to be exposed, the financial industry will find a way. The pensioners and blue collar workers who invested themselves won't be consuming much for a while.
The economy does well at low inequality and high wealth, tulip mania creates a highly unequal distribution of wealth in collapse.
Can't match the trades 1:1, they always invest some of their own liquidity.
Why would they care what is being brokered? Whether people are throwing futures around as casino chips or digital tokens, they live off the fees.
Just end patents, much easier.
Then they have the state's decision against them instead of being backed by the state's decision. Also they can't force companies into settlement with injunctions and import restrictions and trials which can drag on longer than the patent re-review. Also they will be limited to the Eastern District of Virginia to appeal in court. Also of course they still have to finish their original trial too even if they win the appeal.
So they get their time, but the old situation was much better for them.
> When has that ever been a good idea?
Most of the time.
Leave regulated non discrimination to governments and monopolies. Let normal people have freedom of association.
I don't know about him, but I think women (and men, and disabled and minorities) need to earn their associations on their own power ... rather than be trust into them environment by state power.
If some men want to be sexist and only hire pretty ladies, so be it. Let capitalism determine if it's a good idea. You seem to think the outcome is predetermined, are men really that superior then?
"because most programmers are white men, these AI are actually often trained using white male faces and male voices"
More so, this won't change anything. Anyone who thinks these algorithms won't be tweaked by the females in HR and Asian males in management to satisfy the Jewish men who own the media is silly.
Don't worry your silly little heads liberals, affirmative action won't go away ...
White men program it, so it can't be fair ... god fucking damn hypocritical sexist, racist twat.
PS. I have no problem with the sexist and racist part, I think everyone should have complete freedom of association, I only take exception with the hypocrisy.
On the internet you can't necessarily counter something on the same page either. Countering on some other facebook feed is no different from countering on some other web page. NYT stood by applauding when Facebook&Co caused violence en masse during the Arab spring ... that shit is why I loathe liberals more than any other political group, their opinions go this way or that with emotion and peer pressure. No consistency or recognition of hypocrisy,
I disagree with libertarians, anarchists, communists ... but at least they have some consistency in their thinking. Liberals are just an insane bunch of fuckers.
Only banning illegal speech when reported is a perfectly reasonable stand to take by social media companies, let the chips fall where they may. Demanding they start censoring based purely on your emotions when the outcome is stupid non-productive violence either way is insane.
Don't build them schools, they are not handicapped. Given them the economic incentive to build schools and send their kids to them.
Certified fair trade is a better way to get kids into schools than just putting up a building.
Unfortunately a lot of water in the world is defacto fossil. Pumping ground water for agriculture is a dangerous habit if you don't have the money, technology and cultural sophistication to change course when you should. Look how it worked in Saudi Arabia, from desert to green back to desert, but now with fucked water tables. They got oil, so it's okay for now ... but otherwise they'd be fucked.
There's only so much you can do to uplift people without just running things and reshaping their entire culture (colonization).
Give them components they can't build themselves, information how to construct the well (internet) and don't brain drain the people who can construct wells with liberal migration policies. Don't just drill a well for them, it creates dependency and laziness.
Indeed, Google and Apple control your mobile phone and the US controls them. End to end encryption on a device you don't control is an illusion.
We don't know to what extent Google/Apple/facebook etc cooperate with court orders for store based attacks on individuals.
If Facebook rolls a compromised Whatsapp client on demand and Google/Apple pushes the update to individuals on court order then end to end encryption is kind of irrelevant. Telegram might be refusing to cooperate with this attack vector in Russia, whereas Facebook does not.
Sure, but they have to bother with encryption because they don't have moles at ever US companies adding new deniable backdoors every day.
What protects you from the Russians won't protect you from the NSA.
The "humanitarian" intervention in Libya destroyed Mali, lead to a massive spike in crime and murders which is still ravaging the country and opened the flood gates to illegal migration to Europe.
With all that in mind, do you think we should intervene in Syria?
Warmongers vs. pacifists, fascists vs. communists, polarization is nothing new. It's not so long ago that Europe still had honest to god anarchists bombing shit ...
They are simply dreamers who think progress is inevitable and as such the world now has to be a better place and any significant ideological clash like in the bad old days should be impossible. Anyone with opinions different from the liberal norm must have had their mind distorted by the evil ad chasing social media. Everything is sun shine and getting better. Except global warming of course ... that's the one catastrophe you are allowed to see coming.
Unfortunately white genocide, peak everything and (regional) overpopulation are bearing down on us as well. Some of us feel kind of upset about it, we'd feel upset about it without the internet too. Dark times ahead.
Autopilot with only break/steering assist to prevent collision and lane departure warning would be safer than what you have now. But you don't want to be safer, you want to be able to not look at the road.
If Tesla keeps this up statistics will catch up to them and the person killed will not be the driver using his phone ... if Tesla is really unlucky it will be a roadworker/cop/fireman/ambulance-worker. Autopilot will be banned next day, stocks price will decimate and Tesla will probably go bankrupt if that happens.
It's a gamble Tesla has to take though, the ability to stare at your phone is what sells their cars.
Autopilot with only break/steering assist to prevent collision and lane departure warning would be safer than what you have now. But you don't want to be safer, you want to be able to not look at the road.
It's not in our interest to cooperate with you in that desire though, because the next firetruck a Tesla runs into might have a fireman standing next to it. It's just a matter of time before someone like you is watching his phone relying on the car to "save" your life while murdering some road worker or cop on the freeway.
People want to look away from the road for minutes at a time and Tesla sells drivers that ability. This is adding more to their bottom line than the fact their cars are electric. Break assist and lane wander warnings would accomplish the same safety features autopilot does, without crashing into firetrucks and lane dividers. If they actually get forced to make autopilot work that way, they will lose a ton of customers though. Not something they could survive, currently.
This is why Tesla is running scared.
Intel has 4096 process ID's now, so that's a lot of stuff in kernel space which could get it's own process space. AMD has address space ID's, but those are meant for virtualization, don't know if they could be abused for microkernel isolation. ARM has 16 domain IDs.
The popular ISAs all allow more than the old kernel/user space division now. It's time to move on.