I know what a CNAME is (and I have plenty of them, mostly pointing to ghs.google.com, but that is another story), but I was trying to point out the no-www certification level Class C?
There is a major difference between the new Google Image Search and TinEye:
Some background: Running a service like TinEye costs a lot of money. How do they do it for free?
TinEye has a major business besides free image-matching for the public. They provide private image-matching services for stock-photo sites like Getty Images (not saying the Getty uses them, but they could.)
The stock-photo site loads their entire collection into TinEye and TinEye finds everyone who is using the picture or a derivative of it. Then the photo site can sue the people who do not have a license to use an image.
Google's search is about extracting information from the image to give you other related pieces of information, not where on the internet you can find the same image.
That's why when you buy the cable on a spool to make your own cables, there're usually marks to indicate where you should cut... the correct length (and harmonic lengths) to cut is dependent on how tightly the pair is twisted.
Maybe the cable I get is too cheap, but I have never seen marks like that.
Sorry, but when you homepage is for a web business that seems to have no clue how to design there own business web pages, it's hard to take seriously.
Maybe I have a bad webpage myself because I spend more time on my network and my clients' networks and web sites???
I have all the clients I can handle right now. Maybe if I was looking for more, I would work on my own website, but right now that is not going to get me any money.
It does not hurt that I made the web site when I was in high school and I have not updated it in a long time.
I have 3 Windows desktops, one Mac and three Linux (Ubuntu and Red Hat).
The Windows ones require the least amount of "caring attention".
The Mac loses its network connection constantly and don't get me started on the troubles with Ubuntu and Red Hat.
That is a 2/10 on the original COPINE Scale, and it does not appear at all on the SAP scale at all (note, I am not talking about posed pictures).
Surely it would have to be 3/10 since the photos were "surreptitiously taken" (especially as they were in a place where there was an expectation of privacy).
If it is part of the rental agreement, then it is most certainly not surreptitious.
In order to avoid legal complications, satellite TV provider like Dish Network and DirecTV require the residents to get a “landlord permission form” filled and signed by the landlord before installation of the satellite TV system at the customers premises.
That article does mention that you can put a satellite dish anywhere inside your apartment, but that is only because of a specific FCC rule, not a law (big difference between the two).
Is it legal for your landlord to enter your apartment and take pictures with no notice? In America, no it is not. The landlord is only allowed to enter your apartment with your permission, or in the event of an emergency (broken water line, fire, etc.).
If you signed a contract with that condition, that is permission.
Are hidden cameras illegal at home or work? In general, video surveillance is lawful if the purpose is lawful. If I put up cameras to prevent theft or vandalism, that's okay. If I put up cameras in a bathroom to get footage of naked people for my porno site, that's not okay. [...]In some states, the public must be notified that they are subject video surveillance on private property. In most states, that's not the case. [.....] Overall, if you own it, you can put a camera on it and not notify anyone.
I have seen all of those stories before, but let's start with the first one:
- Accusation: Yes
- Investigation: Yes
- Annoyance: Certainly
- Conviction: No
The second link on that site is a story I have not seen before, but that is probably because it is a 404.
The third link: one convicted and overturned, one convicted which was obviously wrong (with no further sources available).
In the fourth case listed there:
Angeli was never charged with child pornography, but she was charged with disorderly conduct, malicious destruction of property under $250, and assault and battery with a dangerous weapon. source
a apartment contract can't have stuff in the contract like we have the right to have camera in the apartment or that you can't have your own satellite dish.
you can't consent to child porn and you can't sign away your rights or have stuff in the fine print saying we can read your CC or SS or bank account numbers from the system.
I am not really sure what child exploitation has to do with it. Since when are pictures of naked children called child porn?
That is a 2/10 on the original COPINE Scale, and it does not appear at all on the SAP scale at all (note, I am not talking about posed pictures).
Now that we are past that, who said you can't have "stuff in the fine print" saying anything? Last time I checked, if you sign a contract, you have agreed to whatever it says, which includes the fine print whether you read it or not and even if you think that it does not make sense. You have the right not to sign anything that you feel will be detrimental to you.
Another point: I am sure plenty of people who agree with your comment have used public computers, lets say in the library, to check their email or their bank or some other password protected service. When you use that computer, do you have a right that there can't be something on that computer to steal your information? Why should this be any different?
And if you hit "Yes" saying the translation was effective Google allows you to submit the voicemail to them for someone to listen to. I submit all of my not-important voicemails to them.
As such I've been starting to ponder as I make these drives who the hell is doing this to us? Is it law enforcement or civil engineers who are saying that that 5mph for a few blocks is a good idea?
There are some places in northern New Jersey where the speed limit changes every few blocks because you are changing municipalities and each little town sets its own speed limit. It is incredibly annoying for all the reasons you mentioned.
What is wrong with police putting speed traps where people are speeding? And why is it a problem that they get aggregate speed information from any available source?
This may be overkill for many home networks, but we use pfSense running on an about-8-year-old computer. Besides for firewall, NAT and bandwidth reporting (per-IP and aggregate), we are running Squid/SquidGuard and a VPN connector.
But have we reached the stage were Mac OS X and Linux even need third-party security software? It seems like most Mac and Linux users don't run it."
No, you must have anti-virus software or assume your computer is compromised. The anti-virus software on my mac catches things all the time. I sometimes solder new contacts onto flash drives when a friend/client has broken the end off (usually by smashing the flash drive with a chair while it is plugged it). Sometimes when I insert flash drives in to my mac (just to get the stuff on to a new flash drive or CD) the anti virus warns that there is a (mac) virus on it. With out the anti-virus, I might have run the program to see if it is important to copy it.
1. Most Likely, your hospital has an email system 2. Most Likely your hospital has a web portal to said email system 3. Most Likely, your email system has a calendar available on the portal 4. Most Likely, you over engineered this....
From the question: "The Hospital IT department doesn't offer any iPhone compatible calendar tool"
With a traditional rack (air cooled), your servers will build up heat in the event of an HVAC failure. But at least you have ample time to start a controlled server shutdown sequence. But with liquid cooling, I would imagine...
No need to imagine. Do some calculations and maybe even some prototyping and see what happens. Verbum Sap.
All browsers shall be required to stop trusting those inexpensive standard SSL certs, as well as certs issued by budget CAs. 'Extended Validation' certs will now be baseline, with prices remaining unchanged, and two new levels of verification will be added: 'Extended Validation: Pinky Swear!' 'Double-Secret Extended Validation' This should solve all CA related trust issues.
I read this an laughed, but then when I thought about it, you should not even suggest this kind of idea. Making it more expensive to be secure is not a step in the right direction.
Wait. Microsoft did a major change in their software. After upgrading to the new version of Word you discovered that Adobe's four year old software didn't know how to talk to Microsoft's brand new software. And this is Adobe's fault?
And then you look at Microsoft's brand new software closely and realize that Microsoft's brand new software does not NEED to EVER talk to ANY of Adobe's software. You can create all the PDFs you want for FREE (okay, you did buy Office for how many hundred dollars).
When you use Google Apps are you using a Google product on your own servers or are you actually paying Google to provide mail, apps, etc? I don't know how Google Apps works, so I'm asking you guys. Is Northwestern University (who was mentioned in the story has "outsourcing it's mail to Google") really "outsourcing"?
100% outsourcing. Google will not allow you to run their software on your own servers.
Second point, Northwestern is not paying anyone. Google Apps for Education is FREE.
Back to the first point, even if you buy a Google Search Appliance (several thousand dollars) you still can not get root access to the device because that might allow you to see the code for the search engine.
I know what a CNAME is (and I have plenty of them, mostly pointing to ghs.google.com, but that is another story), but I was trying to point out the no-www certification level Class C?
Are you sure?
There are other points-of-view of course.
There is a major difference between the new Google Image Search and TinEye:
Some background: Running a service like TinEye costs a lot of money. How do they do it for free?
TinEye has a major business besides free image-matching for the public. They provide private image-matching services for stock-photo sites like Getty Images (not saying the Getty uses them, but they could.)
The stock-photo site loads their entire collection into TinEye and TinEye finds everyone who is using the picture or a derivative of it. Then the photo site can sue the people who do not have a license to use an image.
Google's search is about extracting information from the image to give you other related pieces of information, not where on the internet you can find the same image.
That's why when you buy the cable on a spool to make your own cables, there're usually marks to indicate where you should cut... the correct length (and harmonic lengths) to cut is dependent on how tightly the pair is twisted.
Maybe the cable I get is too cheap, but I have never seen marks like that.
The truth is that I plan on replacing it when I upgrade my billing and support system later this year.
man with crappy network blames others.
Sorry, but when you homepage is for a web business that seems to have no clue how to design there own business web pages, it's hard to take seriously.
Maybe I have a bad webpage myself because I spend more time on my network and my clients' networks and web sites???
I have all the clients I can handle right now. Maybe if I was looking for more, I would work on my own website, but right now that is not going to get me any money.
It does not hurt that I made the web site when I was in high school and I have not updated it in a long time.
I have 3 Windows desktops, one Mac and three Linux (Ubuntu and Red Hat). The Windows ones require the least amount of "caring attention". The Mac loses its network connection constantly and don't get me started on the troubles with Ubuntu and Red Hat.
That is a 2/10 on the original COPINE Scale, and it does not appear at all on the SAP scale at all (note, I am not talking about posed pictures).
Surely it would have to be 3/10 since the photos were "surreptitiously taken" (especially as they were in a place where there was an expectation of privacy).
If it is part of the rental agreement, then it is most certainly not surreptitious.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=satelite+dish+apartment
Like this quotes from the first page of results:
In order to avoid legal complications, satellite TV provider like Dish Network and DirecTV require the residents to get a “landlord permission form” filled and signed by the landlord before installation of the satellite TV system at the customers premises.
That article does mention that you can put a satellite dish anywhere inside your apartment, but that is only because of a specific FCC rule, not a law (big difference between the two).
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=apartment+hidden+camera+illegal
Like these:
Is it legal for your landlord to enter your apartment and take pictures with no notice?
In America, no it is not. The landlord is only allowed to enter your apartment with your permission, or in the event of an emergency (broken water line, fire, etc.).
If you signed a contract with that condition, that is permission.
Are hidden cameras illegal at home or work?
In general, video surveillance is lawful if the purpose is lawful. If I put up cameras to prevent theft or vandalism, that's okay. If I put up cameras in a bathroom to get footage of naked people for my porno site, that's not okay. [...]In some states, the public must be notified that they are subject video surveillance on private property. In most states, that's not the case. [.....] Overall, if you own it, you can put a camera on it and not notify anyone.
Try this one: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=nanny+cam+laws
http://www.solresearch.org/~SOLR/rprt/LookNow.asp#Sct_1_NakedKidPics [solresearch.org] There have been many dozen cases of people taking pics of their baby kids in a bathtub or otherwise half dressed and successfully convicted.
I have seen all of those stories before, but let's start with the first one:
- Accusation: Yes
- Investigation: Yes
- Annoyance: Certainly
- Conviction: No
The second link on that site is a story I have not seen before, but that is probably because it is a 404.
The third link: one convicted and overturned, one convicted which was obviously wrong (with no further sources available).
In the fourth case listed there:
Angeli was never charged with child pornography, but she was charged with disorderly conduct, malicious destruction of property under $250, and assault and battery with a dangerous weapon. source
Summary: No convictions.
a apartment contract can't have stuff in the contract like we have the right to have camera in the apartment or that you can't have your own satellite dish.
Source? Why not?
you can't consent to child porn and you can't sign away your rights or have stuff in the fine print saying we can read your CC or SS or bank account numbers from the system.
I am not really sure what child exploitation has to do with it. Since when are pictures of naked children called child porn? That is a 2/10 on the original COPINE Scale, and it does not appear at all on the SAP scale at all (note, I am not talking about posed pictures).
Now that we are past that, who said you can't have "stuff in the fine print" saying anything? Last time I checked, if you sign a contract, you have agreed to whatever it says, which includes the fine print whether you read it or not and even if you think that it does not make sense. You have the right not to sign anything that you feel will be detrimental to you.
Another point: I am sure plenty of people who agree with your comment have used public computers, lets say in the library, to check their email or their bank or some other password protected service. When you use that computer, do you have a right that there can't be something on that computer to steal your information? Why should this be any different?
And if you hit "Yes" saying the translation was effective Google allows you to submit the voicemail to them for someone to listen to. I submit all of my not-important voicemails to them.
Your voicemails/transcriptions have a button you can check to mark whether or not it was accurate.
And once you click that button, you have the option to donate your message so they can use it to improve their software. Example: http://img808.imageshack.us/img808/242/unled90.png
As such I've been starting to ponder as I make these drives who the hell is doing this to us? Is it law enforcement or civil engineers who are saying that that 5mph for a few blocks is a good idea?
There are some places in northern New Jersey where the speed limit changes every few blocks because you are changing municipalities and each little town sets its own speed limit. It is incredibly annoying for all the reasons you mentioned.
What is wrong with police putting speed traps where people are speeding?
And why is it a problem that they get aggregate speed information from any available source?
This may be overkill for many home networks, but we use pfSense running on an about-8-year-old computer.
Besides for firewall, NAT and bandwidth reporting (per-IP and aggregate), we are running Squid/SquidGuard and a VPN connector.
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (2793.01-MHz 686-class CPU)
RAM: 512 MB
No, you must have anti-virus software or assume your computer is compromised. The anti-virus software on my mac catches things all the time.
I sometimes solder new contacts onto flash drives when a friend/client has broken the end off (usually by smashing the flash drive with a chair while it is plugged it).
Sometimes when I insert flash drives in to my mac (just to get the stuff on to a new flash drive or CD) the anti virus warns that there is a (mac) virus on it. With out the anti-virus, I might have run the program to see if it is important to copy it.
1. Most Likely, your hospital has an email system
2. Most Likely your hospital has a web portal to said email system
3. Most Likely, your email system has a calendar available on the portal
4. Most Likely, you over engineered this....
From the question: "The Hospital IT department doesn't offer any iPhone compatible calendar tool"
This sounds a lot like the slashdot moderation scheme...
For those who did not know, you can get the source code behind slashdot here
With a traditional rack (air cooled), your servers will build up heat in the event of an HVAC failure. But at least you have ample time to start a controlled server shutdown sequence. But with liquid cooling, I would imagine...
No need to imagine. Do some calculations and maybe even some prototyping and see what happens.
Verbum Sap.
All browsers shall be required to stop trusting those inexpensive standard SSL certs, as well as certs issued by budget CAs. 'Extended Validation' certs will now be baseline, with prices remaining unchanged, and two new levels of verification will be added:
'Extended Validation: Pinky Swear!'
'Double-Secret Extended Validation'
This should solve all CA related trust issues.
I read this an laughed, but then when I thought about it, you should not even suggest this kind of idea.
Making it more expensive to be secure is not a step in the right direction.
Wait. Microsoft did a major change in their software. After upgrading to the new version of Word you discovered that Adobe's four year old software didn't know how to talk to Microsoft's brand new software. And this is Adobe's fault?
And then you look at Microsoft's brand new software closely and realize that Microsoft's brand new software does not NEED to EVER talk to ANY of Adobe's software.
You can create all the PDFs you want for FREE (okay, you did buy Office for how many hundred dollars).
You can vote for it to be real at http://www.thinkgeek.com/42.shtml
When you use Google Apps are you using a Google product on your own servers or are you actually paying Google to provide mail, apps, etc? I don't know how Google Apps works, so I'm asking you guys. Is Northwestern University (who was mentioned in the story has "outsourcing it's mail to Google") really "outsourcing"?
100% outsourcing. Google will not allow you to run their software on your own servers.
Second point, Northwestern is not paying anyone. Google Apps for Education is FREE.
Back to the first point, even if you buy a Google Search Appliance (several thousand dollars) you still can not get root access to the device because that might allow you to see the code for the search engine.