Where would they get the water from, retard? Other states won't be able to sell it to CA without charging HUGE tariffs. The rest of the union will NOT stand for secession. The last time it happened, we RAZED CITIES AND KILLED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE.
You fucking millennial are a generation that doesn't know what war means. You're lucky. All you know are pointless political occupations.
What shitstain state do you live in that certifies an election without counting ALL the ballots, regardless of the margins? Cite or STFU.
Further, in CA, many illegals do vote. All you need to do is go to a polling place with the name and address of a registered voter. All you need to do to register to vote is lie. They don't check for national citizenship. The other AC is right.
What does that even mean? Show me the statistics that make sense on that.
Further, there's no guarantee that the multiple states would be admitted (or that CA would ever be allowed to leave). A much more workable plan is to split it into 2 states.
Russia technically and legally owns Ukraine after the dissolution of the USSR.
The current corrupt Ukraine "government" simply wants to avoid paying on its massive debt to Russia and keep the thousands of nukes they have so they can sell them for $$$,
Tons of people within the Ukraine oppose the previous revolution, reject the current "government", and want to reunify with Russia. These people are smart - without Russia, Ukraine is nothing but another former USSR territory in the skidmark of Eurasia. Everyone on the outside should want the same - without Russia controlling Ukraine, the nukes (and there are still many) will continue to funneled off to other crazies in the Middle East and East Asia.
Russia ain't great, but it's a significant nation that, as we've seen, isn't afraid to pursue its interests and protect its borders, regardless of what Uncle Sam and the Eurozone think. Russia isn't evil and they're no more corrupt than the US.
Russia isn't invading Ukraine because Russia already owns it.
Why do we consider Ukraine to be independent and free, given its history? We don't dare to tell China SHIT about Tibet/Taiwan, and of course, we bend over backwards to give money to Israel and threaten anyone who tries to stop them from their atrocities.
So why is Ukraine a free and independent nation being invaded by Russia? because Russia is the boogeyman they want you to hate, yet again.
If you want to know where the power will lie, it will lie with Pence, Ivanka and Jared Kushner. You know, much how Trump's businesses work. He plays the entertaining and outrageous CEO type, while the actual businesspeople run the businesses.
You've got a lot of retarded comments on this story. This takes the cake.
You think Ivanka Trump will hold a lot of power. You think Ivanka Trump is an actual business person.
Considering that staffer was already murdered, there's not much point in protecting him, especially when you add in the fact that the clowns accusing Russia risk inciting world war.
Trump has been pro-Russia all along and has millions (billions?) to gain from his business interests by supporting them.
Given that the Democrats are trying to start WWIII by doing everything from poking Russia with a pointy stick to rolling out tanks on their border, this is a damned good thing.
The real question is, do American interests align with Russia. If the answer is yes, by all means, believe Trump and his ilk. Otherwise, well, Houston, we have a problem...
Well, my interest is in not seeing WWIII, and I'm pretty sure Russia's interest is the same. I don't need to believe Trump or anyone for that to be the case, I can just be glad we didn't get Warhawk Clinton.
Further, you can't use the results of the election, which was played under one set of rules (EC votes) to determine the preference of voters without those rules. If the rules had been for the popular vote to win, the results would have different because the campaigns would have been different.
Clinton won the American vote count. More Americans voted for her and I note that as someone who personally did not. Period.
Trump won the elector college. More small / inbred / uneducated / red states voted for him, with the asterisk that many were poorly informed by Russian troll fake news with both Fox and Breitbart complicit in it.
Except Trump was personally against the Electoral college AND alleged "massive" in-person voter fraud that basically didn't exist. Politics as usual, Russian hacks influencing the election, saturating us with fake news, and a demagogue troll like Trump elected? I don't think so.
Define "won". She didn't get a majority of people to vote for her. She didn't even get a majority of the votes that were cast by people who bothered to vote for President. She got the plurality of that.
The great majority of Americans did not vote for her. The majority of American voters voted against her. She lost the election (EC votes, AKA the ones that matter) in a fucking landslide.
As a Californian, I say Californians should have no right to vote in national elections until they prove they are US citizens. I'd extend that to any state that has an illegal immigration problem. And I'd support a Constitutional Amendment to require proof of national citizenship to vote in national elections. (I would NOT approve of any federal law other than a Constitutional Amendment to require this nationwide - currently, the Constitution says that States run their elections.)
Further, California can't even get its ass together with regards to splitting off Northern California and Southern California into 2 states (which is an idea put forth every few years). CA is not leaving the U.S. of A., nor does it have the right to. Even if it did, it would wither and die, literally, because we're in a biiiiiiiiiiit of a drought. And ultimately, there is no fucking way the US Navy would cede that much Pacific coastline to a turkey shit state like CA, there's no way the US would be selling oil/power/water to an annoying brat who ran away from home at prices other than "fuck you", and there's no way Silicon Valley would stay connected to the internet as they know it should CA attempt to pull such a stunt. The last time people left the club, the nation engaged in Civil War, which is still the deadliest war we've ever had, and that was with many states trying to leave. Not even Texas has the balls to actually quit, and Texas would be perfectly fine on its own (plenty of land, food, water, oil, electricity, etc.).
Which rule says we can't consider the popular vote in any way whatsoever, even to make a pointed remark criticizing Donald Trump's inability to get more people to vote for him than anyone else?
The "Don't be a little bitch." rule. You can QQ all you want, but you should expect others to tell you to STFU when you do because everyone's sick of hearing it.
The architecture can address that much, but the actual product will only address what's available. There will be on-package HBM2 and the ability to connect to on-board (but off-package) storage in the form of fast flash.
512 TB of addressable space is just future proofing to allow for seamless work with a dataset regardless of whether it's on the 16 GB of ball-smackingly fast HBM2, on the SSD on your RadeonPro card, or in your system memory (or potential even abstracted out to disk storage). The drivers and GPU's memory manager handle moving the data around as you work on it. You shouldn't have to explicitly manage the dataset and thus not have to load it twice. In a worst-case scenario you'll be moving stuff back and forth over the PICe bus, just as you do now. But that'll only happen if you're trying to be stupid or your dataset exceeds the capacity of the on-board memory and SSD.
Also keep in mind that AMD will almost certainly be releasing APUs (their CPU+GPU combos) with Vega cores and HBM2 memory. This is all an extension of their previous push for HSA (heterogeneous system architecture) - essentially tying CPU and GPU and memory and everything else closely together and letting everyone talk to each other in the most efficient way possible.
What you will find is that most cards have only a fraction of their RAM as addressable, so a 16GB card either 4 or 8 gigs addressable. The increase to 512GB is a godsend to AI researchers and other fields with large datasets.
Nope.
1: The GPU addresses the whole damn pool.
2: We're talking about 512 TB, not GB.
3: They're not planning to release a card with 512 TB of RAM, but they are releasing professional cards with lots of RAM (8 GB, 16 GB, or more) AND onboard connections for flash storage (SSDs). Vega will likely continue and extend this. By having a huge address space, you simply have the ability to keep the entire dataset in your cache on the card. The memory controller then decides what needs to live in the fast HBM2 chips at any given moment. You don't need to use PCIe bandwidth, go through the CPU, or (gasp) go to disk storage to get your dataset onto the card for processing after the initial load. You don't need to manually load pieces into or out of the GPU's memory. You just load your shit once and tell it to fucking go.
Yup. Verizon is only interested in the buyout for the user data. That user data is available for a song now on the "dark web", and advertisers who are interested in it already have a copy.
Something that can learn new things on its own, for a start. You can't take AlphaGo and teach it to play backgammon without reprogramming it, for example.
Neural nets can implement just about anything they're trained to. It won't necessarily be the best or most accurate (it can easily fall into a local min/max issue until it's trained on data that bumps it out) but it generally works if you give it simple rules and goals, then let it train. A "search algorithm" here refers to a decision tree for making moves.
Slashdot Mirror
Where would they get the water from, retard? Other states won't be able to sell it to CA without charging HUGE tariffs. The rest of the union will NOT stand for secession. The last time it happened, we RAZED CITIES AND KILLED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE.
You fucking millennial are a generation that doesn't know what war means. You're lucky. All you know are pointless political occupations.
What does California have to do with Bitcoin, exactly?
What shitstain state do you live in that certifies an election without counting ALL the ballots, regardless of the margins? Cite or STFU.
Further, in CA, many illegals do vote. All you need to do is go to a polling place with the name and address of a registered voter. All you need to do to register to vote is lie. They don't check for national citizenship. The other AC is right.
What does that even mean? Show me the statistics that make sense on that.
Further, there's no guarantee that the multiple states would be admitted (or that CA would ever be allowed to leave). A much more workable plan is to split it into 2 states.
Russia technically and legally owns Ukraine after the dissolution of the USSR.
The current corrupt Ukraine "government" simply wants to avoid paying on its massive debt to Russia and keep the thousands of nukes they have so they can sell them for $$$,
Tons of people within the Ukraine oppose the previous revolution, reject the current "government", and want to reunify with Russia. These people are smart - without Russia, Ukraine is nothing but another former USSR territory in the skidmark of Eurasia. Everyone on the outside should want the same - without Russia controlling Ukraine, the nukes (and there are still many) will continue to funneled off to other crazies in the Middle East and East Asia.
Russia ain't great, but it's a significant nation that, as we've seen, isn't afraid to pursue its interests and protect its borders, regardless of what Uncle Sam and the Eurozone think. Russia isn't evil and they're no more corrupt than the US.
Read a history book.
Such troll. ROFL.
Clinton's bogeyman is Russia. Trump's bogeyman is China. Po-Tay-To, Po-Tah-To.
So how do you see Trump's tweet that "let there be an arm's race" and "we need more nukes"?
You're a retard. Quote the whole statement or STFU.
Russia isn't invading Ukraine because Russia already owns it.
Why do we consider Ukraine to be independent and free, given its history? We don't dare to tell China SHIT about Tibet/Taiwan, and of course, we bend over backwards to give money to Israel and threaten anyone who tries to stop them from their atrocities.
So why is Ukraine a free and independent nation being invaded by Russia? because Russia is the boogeyman they want you to hate, yet again.
Duh. It's Reptilians vs. Pleiadians.
If you want to know where the power will lie, it will lie with Pence, Ivanka and Jared Kushner. You know, much how Trump's businesses work. He plays the entertaining and outrageous CEO type, while the actual businesspeople run the businesses.
You've got a lot of retarded comments on this story. This takes the cake.
You think Ivanka Trump will hold a lot of power. You think Ivanka Trump is an actual business person.
Considering that staffer was already murdered, there's not much point in protecting him, especially when you add in the fact that the clowns accusing Russia risk inciting world war.
Trump has been pro-Russia all along and has millions (billions?) to gain from his business interests by supporting them.
Given that the Democrats are trying to start WWIII by doing everything from poking Russia with a pointy stick to rolling out tanks on their border, this is a damned good thing.
The real question is, do American interests align with Russia. If the answer is yes, by all means, believe Trump and his ilk. Otherwise, well, Houston, we have a problem...
Well, my interest is in not seeing WWIII, and I'm pretty sure Russia's interest is the same. I don't need to believe Trump or anyone for that to be the case, I can just be glad we didn't get Warhawk Clinton.
Not all states are "winner takes all".
Further, you can't use the results of the election, which was played under one set of rules (EC votes) to determine the preference of voters without those rules.
If the rules had been for the popular vote to win, the results would have different because the campaigns would have been different.
Clinton won the American vote count. More Americans voted for her and I note that as someone who personally did not. Period.
Trump won the elector college. More small / inbred / uneducated / red states voted for him, with the asterisk that many were poorly informed by Russian troll fake news with both Fox and Breitbart complicit in it.
Except Trump was personally against the Electoral college AND alleged "massive" in-person voter fraud that basically didn't exist. Politics as usual, Russian hacks influencing the election, saturating us with fake news, and a demagogue troll like Trump elected? I don't think so.
Define "won".
She didn't get a majority of people to vote for her.
She didn't even get a majority of the votes that were cast by people who bothered to vote for President.
She got the plurality of that.
The great majority of Americans did not vote for her. The majority of American voters voted against her. She lost the election (EC votes, AKA the ones that matter) in a fucking landslide.
As a Californian, I say Californians should have no right to vote in national elections until they prove they are US citizens.
I'd extend that to any state that has an illegal immigration problem. And I'd support a Constitutional Amendment to require proof of national citizenship to vote in national elections. (I would NOT approve of any federal law other than a Constitutional Amendment to require this nationwide - currently, the Constitution says that States run their elections.)
Further, California can't even get its ass together with regards to splitting off Northern California and Southern California into 2 states (which is an idea put forth every few years). CA is not leaving the U.S. of A., nor does it have the right to. Even if it did, it would wither and die, literally, because we're in a biiiiiiiiiiit of a drought. And ultimately, there is no fucking way the US Navy would cede that much Pacific coastline to a turkey shit state like CA, there's no way the US would be selling oil/power/water to an annoying brat who ran away from home at prices other than "fuck you", and there's no way Silicon Valley would stay connected to the internet as they know it should CA attempt to pull such a stunt. The last time people left the club, the nation engaged in Civil War, which is still the deadliest war we've ever had, and that was with many states trying to leave. Not even Texas has the balls to actually quit, and Texas would be perfectly fine on its own (plenty of land, food, water, oil, electricity, etc.).
Which is utterly irrelevant per the rules.
Which rule says we can't consider the popular vote in any way whatsoever, even to make a pointed remark criticizing Donald Trump's inability to get more people to vote for him than anyone else?
The "Don't be a little bitch." rule. You can QQ all you want, but you should expect others to tell you to STFU when you do because everyone's sick of hearing it.
Let stores that aren't shit take their place?
You don't understand.
The architecture can address that much, but the actual product will only address what's available.
There will be on-package HBM2 and the ability to connect to on-board (but off-package) storage in the form of fast flash.
512 TB of addressable space is just future proofing to allow for seamless work with a dataset regardless of whether it's on the 16 GB of ball-smackingly fast HBM2, on the SSD on your RadeonPro card, or in your system memory (or potential even abstracted out to disk storage). The drivers and GPU's memory manager handle moving the data around as you work on it. You shouldn't have to explicitly manage the dataset and thus not have to load it twice. In a worst-case scenario you'll be moving stuff back and forth over the PICe bus, just as you do now. But that'll only happen if you're trying to be stupid or your dataset exceeds the capacity of the on-board memory and SSD.
Also keep in mind that AMD will almost certainly be releasing APUs (their CPU+GPU combos) with Vega cores and HBM2 memory. This is all an extension of their previous push for HSA (heterogeneous system architecture) - essentially tying CPU and GPU and memory and everything else closely together and letting everyone talk to each other in the most efficient way possible.
What you will find is that most cards have only a fraction of their RAM as addressable, so a 16GB card either 4 or 8 gigs addressable. The increase to 512GB is a godsend to AI researchers and other fields with large datasets.
Nope.
1: The GPU addresses the whole damn pool.
2: We're talking about 512 TB, not GB.
3: They're not planning to release a card with 512 TB of RAM, but they are releasing professional cards with lots of RAM (8 GB, 16 GB, or more) AND onboard connections for flash storage (SSDs). Vega will likely continue and extend this. By having a huge address space, you simply have the ability to keep the entire dataset in your cache on the card. The memory controller then decides what needs to live in the fast HBM2 chips at any given moment. You don't need to use PCIe bandwidth, go through the CPU, or (gasp) go to disk storage to get your dataset onto the card for processing after the initial load. You don't need to manually load pieces into or out of the GPU's memory. You just load your shit once and tell it to fucking go.
You've never seen a time clock? They come in app form now, too.
Yup. Verizon is only interested in the buyout for the user data. That user data is available for a song now on the "dark web", and advertisers who are interested in it already have a copy.
Watch the video AC linked to. Go to 20:00 if you can't stand the annoying shit and just need to see what was done.
I seriously doubt it is that simple.
Well, you're seriously incorrect.
Something that can learn new things on its own, for a start. You can't take AlphaGo and teach it to play backgammon without reprogramming it, for example.
Neural nets can implement just about anything they're trained to. It won't necessarily be the best or most accurate (it can easily fall into a local min/max issue until it's trained on data that bumps it out) but it generally works if you give it simple rules and goals, then let it train. A "search algorithm" here refers to a decision tree for making moves.
The trick some clown director gonna put details in the dark area you need to see then a big bright shit in the center to fuck with you.