All future sales of the PC version of AK have been suspended by Warner Brothers until further notice. Regardless, one shitty game doesn't mean anything.
I'd be happy with a reduced set of 64 characters. A-Z 0-9,./?;":[]\ =-+)(*&^%$#@!~ EOF Return/Newline {we don't use typewriters, let's use a single character)
Drop ', `, _, &;t;, >, {, }, tab, and | Yes, there are all in use, but fuck it.
"Searching for exact strings is an option with Google" No it isn't. Google will never respect an exact string match, not even when you choose "verbatim". A search for ".sdd.sf" using the "verbatim" option will include results without the first ".", as well as the typical unrelated extra results listed next to the top result. I only use this example because it was the last search I performed.
They ALWAYS try to "help" you. You can't even stop them from localizing your search anymore. At best, you can specify a country.
Only idiots "tend to blame drivers" for that shit. The vast majority of changes in driver updates for AMD and nVidia are hacks for specific games to fix their broken shit and get them to not run like ass.
Your RAID controller would have to pass the TRIM commands to the SSDs in the array for this bug to show up. The controller simply having TRIM support doesn't mean it actually passes it to drives that are part of an array. Intel controllers since the Z-77 do pass TRIM along to the drives in the array, but only for RAID 1 and RAID 0.
p>All of the typical ways of storing password hashes store the salt alongside it. It's expected that an attacker that obtains the hash will obtain the salt. It's within the design.
If you want the password hash separate from a piece of key password-validation data, at that point the extra piece of data is a secret and what you're basically making is a message authentication code. But, it's very difficult to argue that this is ever really more secure.
The hash, salt, and user name are all considered to be not secret. In a properly-implemented crypto scheme, having all of those will allow not help you to gain access to the account or crack the password.
"So it is with some interest that I came across today some research by Saikat Guha, a Senior Scientist at Raytheon BBN Technologies and a partner at Microsoft Research, which investigates the feasibility of running web ads from localhost – from the user’s own computer."
This isn't an MS-sponsored paper. It's Saikat Guha, Alexey Reznichenko, Kevin Tang, Hamed Haddadi, and Paul Francis looking to make a few bucks.
"So it is with some interest that I came across today some research by Saikat Guha, a Senior Scientist at Raytheon BBN Technologies and a partner at Microsoft Research, which investigates the feasibility of running web ads from localhost – from the user’s own computer."
This isn't an MS-sponsored paper. It's Saikat Guha, Alexey Reznichenko, Kevin Tang, Hamed Haddadi, and Paul Francis looking to make a few bucks.
Amazingly simple and effective. The investors for these companies are fucking retarded. The companies need to be taking a cut of each fare, not giving a bonus that puts them in the red for each ride, thus making this type of scam possible.
Bullshit: "deep analytics, and new tools developed by our Chinese engineers in our dedicated fraud team to combat against such fraud."
Truth: "We just found out about this and have no idea what we can do to stop it because our entire business model is based on customers claiming they need a ride then claiming they got a ride, and drivers claiming they received payment. We're a middleman that does nothing other than point customers to an unregulated fleet of drivers so we have no idea what is actually going on. If we were taking a cut of each ride payment this scam wouldn't exist, but we have to bleed money by incentivizing drivers with bonuses in order to maintain a public image and keep our name in the news. This allows scammers to fake the ride and fee and share the bonus. We might be able to catch a few of the worst and dumbest offenders by looking at the top bonus earners and their passengers, but that money is long gone and we won't switch to a sustainable model until the last investors left holding the bag demand it."
You seem to forget that Intel paid $1,000,000,000 for ICC bullshit. You seem to forget that Intel didn't hold a monopoly in the "chipset market". You seem to forget that the US government has recently rejected several proposed mergers for major corporations, including telecoms, that would have resulted in monopolies. You seem to forget that granting AMD the ability to continue to use their license is a much easier thing than stringing up a corporation and punishing them. You seem to forget that you still have NO FUCKING CLUE what the terms between AMD and Intel are regarding the x86 and AMD64 licenses. You do NOT know the terms, and you have NO REASON to believe that the license would disappear if AMD were bought by another company.
No, Intel's legal agreement with AMD when the original license expired was something you weren't privy to, nor were you privy to any agreements as a result of Intel using AMD64.
Further, if the agreement is as you imagine it and AMD would lose the license when being bought by another company, AND if AMD was unable to instead continue operating as a subsidiary (keeping the license), the government absolutely would step in and laugh at the prospect of Intel being the only one making x86 CPUs. VIA isn't doing shit and nVidia isn't either (they have the option to). Intel would not be allowed to be the only x86 CPU manufacturer.
No it wouldn't. Intel is already a monopoly, anyone buying AMD would retain the x86 license because the government preventing Intel from controlling 99.999% of the x86 market trumps whatever bullshit is in the x86 license agreement.
Hollywood absolutely does publish books and prop up manufactured "young adult" titles and authors as floaters. It's much cheaper to secure the teens and tweens BEFORE you greenlight the film.
Slashdot Mirror
All future sales of the PC version of AK have been suspended by Warner Brothers until further notice.
Regardless, one shitty game doesn't mean anything.
I'd be happy with a reduced set of 64 characters. ,./?;":[]\ =-+)(*&^%$#@!~
A-Z
0-9
EOF
Return/Newline {we don't use typewriters, let's use a single character)
Drop ', `, _, &;t;, >, {, }, tab, and |
Yes, there are all in use, but fuck it.
Not only is Amazon's search absolutely broken, you can't even sort by price. Sure, they give you the option to, but it doesn't work.
"Searching for exact strings is an option with Google"
No it isn't. Google will never respect an exact string match, not even when you choose "verbatim". A search for ".sdd.sf" using the "verbatim" option will include results without the first ".", as well as the typical unrelated extra results listed next to the top result. I only use this example because it was the last search I performed.
They ALWAYS try to "help" you. You can't even stop them from localizing your search anymore. At best, you can specify a country.
Only idiots "tend to blame drivers" for that shit.
The vast majority of changes in driver updates for AMD and nVidia are hacks for specific games to fix their broken shit and get them to not run like ass.
Your RAID controller would have to pass the TRIM commands to the SSDs in the array for this bug to show up. The controller simply having TRIM support doesn't mean it actually passes it to drives that are part of an array.
Intel controllers since the Z-77 do pass TRIM along to the drives in the array, but only for RAID 1 and RAID 0.
I'm pretty sure both Firefox and Chrom* support WebRTC in some way.
Nah, Lucina has it, not Chrom.
p>All of the typical ways of storing password hashes store the salt alongside it. It's expected that an attacker that obtains the hash will obtain the salt. It's within the design.
If you want the password hash separate from a piece of key password-validation data, at that point the extra piece of data is a secret and what you're basically making is a message authentication code. But, it's very difficult to argue that this is ever really more secure.
The hash, salt, and user name are all considered to be not secret. In a properly-implemented crypto scheme, having all of those will allow not help you to gain access to the account or crack the password.
Can one miss a point that isn't there?
An Origami Inspired Bacteria-Powered Battery
Which origami, specifically, inspired "Bacteria Powered Battery"?
Who (or what) is referred to by the proper noun "Bacteria Powered Battery"?
Did the person I responded to specify "programming language"? (Hint: NO)
There is far more HTML and Javascript and XML on the web than there is English.
The person I was responding to did not specify "programming language".
"So it is with some interest that I came across today some research by Saikat Guha, a Senior Scientist at Raytheon BBN Technologies and a partner at Microsoft Research, which investigates the feasibility of running web ads from localhost – from the user’s own computer."
This isn't an MS-sponsored paper. It's Saikat Guha, Alexey Reznichenko, Kevin Tang, Hamed Haddadi, and Paul Francis looking to make a few bucks.
"So it is with some interest that I came across today some research by Saikat Guha, a Senior Scientist at Raytheon BBN Technologies and a partner at Microsoft Research, which investigates the feasibility of running web ads from localhost – from the user’s own computer."
This isn't an MS-sponsored paper. It's Saikat Guha, Alexey Reznichenko, Kevin Tang, Hamed Haddadi, and Paul Francis looking to make a few bucks.
Saikat Guha, Alexey Reznichenko, Kevin Tang, Hamed Haddadi, Paul Francis
Max Planck Institute for Software Systems and Cornell University
sguha@mpi-sws.org
areznich@mpi-sws.org
hamed@mpi-sws.org
francis@mpi-sws.org
kt258@cornell.edu
Amazingly simple and effective.
The investors for these companies are fucking retarded. The companies need to be taking a cut of each fare, not giving a bonus that puts them in the red for each ride, thus making this type of scam possible.
The most popular language on the web HTML.
The second most popular language on the web is Javascript.
The third is XML.
Bullshit: "deep analytics, and new tools developed by our Chinese engineers in our dedicated fraud team to combat against such fraud."
Truth: "We just found out about this and have no idea what we can do to stop it because our entire business model is based on customers claiming they need a ride then claiming they got a ride, and drivers claiming they received payment. We're a middleman that does nothing other than point customers to an unregulated fleet of drivers so we have no idea what is actually going on. If we were taking a cut of each ride payment this scam wouldn't exist, but we have to bleed money by incentivizing drivers with bonuses in order to maintain a public image and keep our name in the news. This allows scammers to fake the ride and fee and share the bonus. We might be able to catch a few of the worst and dumbest offenders by looking at the top bonus earners and their passengers, but that money is long gone and we won't switch to a sustainable model until the last investors left holding the bag demand it."
You seem to forget that Intel paid $1,000,000,000 for ICC bullshit.
You seem to forget that Intel didn't hold a monopoly in the "chipset market".
You seem to forget that the US government has recently rejected several proposed mergers for major corporations, including telecoms, that would have resulted in monopolies.
You seem to forget that granting AMD the ability to continue to use their license is a much easier thing than stringing up a corporation and punishing them.
You seem to forget that you still have NO FUCKING CLUE what the terms between AMD and Intel are regarding the x86 and AMD64 licenses. You do NOT know the terms, and you have NO REASON to believe that the license would disappear if AMD were bought by another company.
No, Intel's legal agreement with AMD when the original license expired was something you weren't privy to, nor were you privy to any agreements as a result of Intel using AMD64.
Further, if the agreement is as you imagine it and AMD would lose the license when being bought by another company, AND if AMD was unable to instead continue operating as a subsidiary (keeping the license), the government absolutely would step in and laugh at the prospect of Intel being the only one making x86 CPUs. VIA isn't doing shit and nVidia isn't either (they have the option to). Intel would not be allowed to be the only x86 CPU manufacturer.
No it wouldn't. Intel is already a monopoly, anyone buying AMD would retain the x86 license because the government preventing Intel from controlling 99.999% of the x86 market trumps whatever bullshit is in the x86 license agreement.
Yup. "Simulated projections" are not data.
Bikes do not have the responsibilities of any other vehicle.
Talk to me when they're registered and they obey stop signs and red lights.
Hollywood absolutely does publish books and prop up manufactured "young adult" titles and authors as floaters.
It's much cheaper to secure the teens and tweens BEFORE you greenlight the film.
The correct answer is Rusty Shakleford.