"Reputable ad networks" is an oxymoron. Like "trustworthy door-to-door salesman", "truthful infomercial", "respectable telemarketer", or "honest politician".
The quote is "My eyes! The goggles do nothing!". Get it right. There is no "they", nor is there any bad pronunciation. There is an accent, but it is still clearly and properly enunciated and articulated.
Actually we can even see now that ram is obsolete, once SSD catch up in speed (you don't even need current ram speed) why would anyone care about transfering data to ram, work on it then store it back? Just work straight on your data, gone are the days of saving, now will be the days of deleting, temporary working directory...
The passwords are property. The passwords are not his property. He was in possession of them beyond his employment. That is theft. Theft is a crime. He is criminal. He stood trial as a criminal.
When terminated, he has to rescind said property. Biometric systems would simply need to be reconfigured on the last day of employment.
Refusal to do so is criminal.
It's no different than being told to "clean our your desk by Tuesday", and then locking the keys to your desk inside the desk.
He is criminally at fault and he is liable to pay to fix it. The fact that he was given the option to fix it himself (relinquish the passwords) has no legal bearing. He was actually given a break by his employees (as he would have been financially broken if he had been forced to cover the costs of having it "fixed" by a third party).
Let's try a car analogy. You take your car into the dealer to have it serviced. You don't like the work they do because it's taking to long, they're increasing the estimate, etc. and you decide to take the car somewhere else. You go to pick up your car and the dealership thinks you're a jerk. They lock the keys in the car and tell you to fuck off.
Early education has some pretty clear goalposts. Any teacher worth his salt (there are still a few, I assure you!) can write their own lesson plans. A year's worth of lesson plans bound together and typed up would be a... get this... textbook!
While that fact is interesting, if I bought a chip that says it could do X, I still expect it to live up to X. It doesn't matter if X is a reject from manufacturing Y. If they were Y-rejects that still can't handle X, don't sell it as such.
If you bought a chip that says it could do X, assume it can do X-Z, where Z is the sum total of shittiness forced upon you as a result of:
LOL Nvidia Bad Bumps LOL Shitty ATI Driver LOL Lead-Free Solder
You're a bad person, this "story" is bad, and you should feel bad.
Protip: Go change your password now so Verizon doesn't change it again 18 months from now when some intern prints out an excel spreadhseet with IPs and router serial numbers on it, then leaves it on a bus.
Which rest of us? Some people or maybe most people could give a rats ass about digital vs analog. Its just tv and last time I checked the video and sound from my $35 dvd player looked good enough on my Philips 47PFL5704D/F7
See, this is what we're talking about. You've mixed up the right channel audio RCA cable (red) with the Pr component video RCA cable (also red).
Credit card companies have to pay out for fraud that's reported to them.
Most fraud goes unreported.
Credit card companies constantly introduce features and changes to the PCI rules, and their merchant agreements, that facilitate fraud.
Mag stripe cloning requires physical access to the card. RFID can be cloned silently, without ever touching the card.
They offer rewards because they want you in the habit of charging everything. They want you perpetually in debt. And my point was not about rewards, it was specifically about rewards for using your debit card as a credit card. Nearly all debit card transactions can be run as a credit transaction. This is a shitty idea for the user, because it only encourages more debt, what little security debit cards had (pin or billing zip code requirement) is removed, there is less regulation for credit transactions than their is for ACH transactions, and fraud via stolen cards is less likely to be noticed, and thus, less likely to be reported.
Merchants are indeed forbidden to verify signature, name, etc. There are many merchants that ignore the rules in their agreement, and I thank them for that. There are also many merchants who charge a fee or have a minimum purchase amount for using a credit card. This is also against the terms of their agreement. All a merchant has to do is produce a slip of paper, the electronic image, or whatever, and sign an affidavit saying "This is the customer's signature.". Merchants still HAVE to REQUIRE a signature for all purchases over a "convenience threshold". The merchant is FORBIDDEN to actually compare the signature to one on your driver's license, past purchase records, the one on the back of your card, whatever.
All a merchant can do is: Look at the back of your card to see if it is signed. Run the card and see if it is approved, declined, or flagged as stolen. If approved, require for a signature for charges over $20.
Your card is "signed" if there is any marking on the back of it in the "sign here" strip. Your "signature" is any mark the cardholder (literally, the person holding the card - NOT the actual cardMEMBER) makes. The $20 threshold may still be $10 in many places, and will be updated when they renew their agreements.
The bottom line is you don't know what you're talking about, but felt the need to try to contradict me and paint me as some conspiracy theorist. Fuck off.
This is why the credit card companies keep shitting on security - they profit off of fraud.
Merchants are forbidden to verify the name on your card, ask to see your ID, verify your signature, ask for a signature for small purchases, etc.
Cards are being shipped with RFID bullshit in a direct attempt to increase fraud - fraud that the user isn't even aware of.
Banks offer rewards for charging purchases to a debit card as credit. Why? Because when charged as credit, you don't need to enter a pin or billing zip code. Get people used to charging purchases as credit, and they won't notice the fraudulent charges on their statement.
Security features such as the extra digits on the back of your card, passwords (such as Verified by Visa) are pointless theater. A merchant has no reason whatsoever to participate in the program other than to say "We're "secure"!". Indeed, many merchants still store the CV2/etc. code on the back of your card, and most merchants will simply default to processing the transaction without the password feature if you fail to enter the proper password.
Hell, I've had Banc of America admit to knowing about "errors" in their system. Said "errors" resulted in them transferring MY money around from Bank of America and Banc of America in a deliberate effort to hit me with overdraft fees.
Neither Bank of America nor Banc of America would do anything to fix it, even when I walked into a physical branch. I had to tell them to close all of my accounts and give me all of my money back, and file complaints with every regulatory agency under the sun for them to fix it.
The bottom line is - watch your statements, do the math yourself, and never let them get away with even a single fucking penny.
Slashdot Mirror
"Reputable ad networks" is an oxymoron.
Like "trustworthy door-to-door salesman", "truthful infomercial", "respectable telemarketer", or "honest politician".
Not recognition of the irony of linking to belowtheline.org while recommending voting above the line?
Australia is in the southern hemisphere, so when we see a link to "below the line", it's actually "above the line" from their perspective.
Hey, retard.
Maybe next time you should check your shit.
The quote is as I stated it.
I am correct.
You are wrong.
There is no "they" in the quote.
This has nothing to do with being required to assist the employer. It's about returning the employer's property.
Passwords are no different than physical keys, a company laptop, or a company car.
There's a reason the dude is in jail.
And you can huff and puff all you want, but you're wrong.
W R O N G .
My eyes - the goggles - zey do nuhsing!
The quote is "My eyes! The goggles do nothing!".
Get it right. There is no "they", nor is there any bad pronunciation. There is an accent, but it is still clearly and properly enunciated and articulated.
Actually we can even see now that ram is obsolete, once SSD catch up in speed (you don't even need current ram speed) why would anyone care about transfering data to ram, work on it then store it back? Just work straight on your data, gone are the days of saving, now will be the days of deleting, temporary working directory...
This is the dumbest thing I've ever read.
Low visibility? It's perfectly clear and open.
And how do you explain this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QESfEd180rQ#t=2m02s
Horse. Shit.
And I have proof.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QESfEd180rQ
Information can indeed be property.
Especially when you're the sole physical holder of said information and said information is owned by someone else.
Dude is a criminal.
You are a retard.
The passwords are property.
The passwords are not his property.
He was in possession of them beyond his employment.
That is theft.
Theft is a crime.
He is criminal.
He stood trial as a criminal.
When terminated, he has to rescind said property.
Biometric systems would simply need to be reconfigured on the last day of employment.
Refusal to do so is criminal.
It's no different than being told to "clean our your desk by Tuesday", and then locking the keys to your desk inside the desk.
He is criminally at fault and he is liable to pay to fix it. The fact that he was given the option to fix it himself (relinquish the passwords) has no legal bearing. He was actually given a break by his employees (as he would have been financially broken if he had been forced to cover the costs of having it "fixed" by a third party).
Let's try a car analogy.
You take your car into the dealer to have it serviced.
You don't like the work they do because it's taking to long, they're increasing the estimate, etc. and you decide to take the car somewhere else.
You go to pick up your car and the dealership thinks you're a jerk.
They lock the keys in the car and tell you to fuck off.
Write your own.
Early education has some pretty clear goalposts. ... get this ... textbook!
Any teacher worth his salt (there are still a few, I assure you!) can write their own lesson plans. A year's worth of lesson plans bound together and typed up would be a
Seriously.
SUN struggles to remain relevant.
Said passwords were company property he was holding on to.
While that fact is interesting, if I bought a chip that says it could do X, I still expect it to live up to X. It doesn't matter if X is a reject from manufacturing Y. If they were Y-rejects that still can't handle X, don't sell it as such.
If you bought a chip that says it could do X, assume it can do X-Z, where Z is the sum total of shittiness forced upon you as a result of:
LOL Nvidia Bad Bumps
LOL Shitty ATI Driver
LOL Lead-Free Solder
Ever been to anywhere? Lots of deformed people there, if you are looking for them. *
* Results may vary in Antarctica.
Somebody hasn't seen "The Thing from Another World", or the John Carpenter remake ("The Thing").
Verizon Owns The Router
And Leases It To
The Customer .
In The Event That
The Customer Has "Paid
Off" The Cost Of
Purchasing The Router The
Customer Is Still Bound
By The Initial Agreement .
The Initial Agreement Includes
Verizon's Remote Management Of
The Device Because It
Is A CPE And
It Is Verizon's Network .
It's not responding to HTTP://administrator:passwrod1@UR.IP.ADD.RES:PORT
Verizon is using TR-069
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TR-069 [wikipedia.org]
You're a bad person, this "story" is bad, and you should feel bad.
Protip: Go change your password now so Verizon doesn't change it again 18 months from now when some intern prints out an excel spreadhseet with IPs and router serial numbers on it, then leaves it on a bus.
If he killed off WAN administration, it's not responding to HTTP://administrator:passwrod1@UR.IP.ADD.RES:PORT
Verizon is using TR-069
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TR-069
Which rest of us? Some people or maybe most people could give a rats ass about digital vs analog. Its just tv and last time I checked the video and sound from my $35 dvd player looked good enough on my Philips 47PFL5704D/F7
See, this is what we're talking about.
You've mixed up the right channel audio RCA cable (red) with the Pr component video RCA cable (also red).
This is exactly how it works.
All HDMI cables are the same.
The materials, wire gauge, length, insulator, and connectors are what are different.
If you want a cable that will work for:
HDMI 1.9 4320p 3D 240 Hz 10 Gbps Eithernet 12-bit color 24.4 lossless hd master surround sound
Just buy the thickest (wire gauge!), shortest HDMI cable you need now, and be future proof until they actually change the connector.
Same goes for cat 5 vs cat 5e vs cat 6 vs etc.
Until your credit card number gets stolen lol.
Wait, what? I actually don't pirate software. I don't download what I don't have permission (from the rights holder) to download.
Horse shit.
You're a dirty fucking pirate just like everyone else.
If you're squeaky clean like you claim, I'll run my scrotum through my shredder.
Credit card companies have to pay out for fraud that's reported to them.
Most fraud goes unreported.
Credit card companies constantly introduce features and changes to the PCI rules, and their merchant agreements, that facilitate fraud.
Mag stripe cloning requires physical access to the card. RFID can be cloned silently, without ever touching the card.
They offer rewards because they want you in the habit of charging everything. They want you perpetually in debt. And my point was not about rewards, it was specifically about rewards for using your debit card as a credit card. Nearly all debit card transactions can be run as a credit transaction. This is a shitty idea for the user, because it only encourages more debt, what little security debit cards had (pin or billing zip code requirement) is removed, there is less regulation for credit transactions than their is for ACH transactions, and fraud via stolen cards is less likely to be noticed, and thus, less likely to be reported.
Merchants are indeed forbidden to verify signature, name, etc. There are many merchants that ignore the rules in their agreement, and I thank them for that. There are also many merchants who charge a fee or have a minimum purchase amount for using a credit card. This is also against the terms of their agreement.
All a merchant has to do is produce a slip of paper, the electronic image, or whatever, and sign an affidavit saying "This is the customer's signature.". Merchants still HAVE to REQUIRE a signature for all purchases over a "convenience threshold". The merchant is FORBIDDEN to actually compare the signature to one on your driver's license, past purchase records, the one on the back of your card, whatever.
All a merchant can do is:
Look at the back of your card to see if it is signed.
Run the card and see if it is approved, declined, or flagged as stolen.
If approved, require for a signature for charges over $20.
Your card is "signed" if there is any marking on the back of it in the "sign here" strip.
Your "signature" is any mark the cardholder (literally, the person holding the card - NOT the actual cardMEMBER) makes.
The $20 threshold may still be $10 in many places, and will be updated when they renew their agreements.
The bottom line is you don't know what you're talking about, but felt the need to try to contradict me and paint me as some conspiracy theorist.
Fuck off.
People love to bend over and take it in the ass.
This is why the credit card companies keep shitting on security - they profit off of fraud.
Merchants are forbidden to verify the name on your card, ask to see your ID, verify your signature, ask for a signature for small purchases, etc.
Cards are being shipped with RFID bullshit in a direct attempt to increase fraud - fraud that the user isn't even aware of.
Banks offer rewards for charging purchases to a debit card as credit. Why? Because when charged as credit, you don't need to enter a pin or billing zip code. Get people used to charging purchases as credit, and they won't notice the fraudulent charges on their statement.
Security features such as the extra digits on the back of your card, passwords (such as Verified by Visa) are pointless theater. A merchant has no reason whatsoever to participate in the program other than to say "We're "secure"!". Indeed, many merchants still store the CV2/etc. code on the back of your card, and most merchants will simply default to processing the transaction without the password feature if you fail to enter the proper password.
Hell, I've had Banc of America admit to knowing about "errors" in their system. Said "errors" resulted in them transferring MY money around from Bank of America and Banc of America in a deliberate effort to hit me with overdraft fees.
Neither Bank of America nor Banc of America would do anything to fix it, even when I walked into a physical branch.
I had to tell them to close all of my accounts and give me all of my money back, and file complaints with every regulatory agency under the sun for them to fix it.
The bottom line is - watch your statements, do the math yourself, and never let them get away with even a single fucking penny.