You didn't even read his post, you fucking shitstain cuck.
And as for your firearm deaths per 100,000, since we're talking about criminal gun violence here, you might want to look at the chart of murder's by gun per 100,000 on Wikipedia [wikipedia.org] that doesn't include accidents or suicides. According to that list the top five states with the least numbers are Vermont (Grade: F), New Hampshire (Grade: D-), Hawaii (Grade: B+) , North Dakota (Grade: F) and Iowa (Grade: C-).
That's basically cheaper than Netflix and on a better screen. Also, if the app is on a shared smartphone, that's one movie per day for any member of a family or set of roomies.
A bigger screen, sure. But no projection screen outside of a true IMAX theatre is going to be better than my direct view OLED. And I can't even tell you where the closest, true IMAX theater is, let alone what movies are available to watch on it.
Obama's campaign was not relying on such data. They were spoon fed all the data they asked for from Facebook, regardless of whether they had opted in on his campaign page. Where the fuck did you get that story from?
Otherwise I can just as easily Inspect Element on video streams and get the direct URL of it to download.
No you can't. Most major platforms have layers and layers of obfuscating javascript, and the actual resource URL isn't exposed in the DOM, and neither is the key you need to get a working response from the server.
And many platforms have obnoxious DRM on top of that.
Nope, he's right. Most recent FIRST. And include a full and obvious timestamp on it. I shouldn't have to hunt for a link to mouse over or some icon to click to expose a timestamp.
Thereâ(TM)s a difference between the speed limit and the speed appropriate for the conditions. The posted speed is a limit, not a target.
Not really. Many states have a basic speed law that dictates the speed limit is the safe and appropriate speed. The speed appropriate for the conditions IS the speed limit.
Section 1. Tariffs. (a) The Trade Representative should take all appropriate action under section 301 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2411) to address the acts, policies, and practices of China that are unreasonable or discriminatory and that burden or restrict U.S. commerce. The Trade Representative shall consider whether such action should include increased tariffs on goods from China.
Everything Trump does is a childish ego response to prove he has a bigger dick.
Like the majority of EVERYTHING that is sold in the US is made in China. So how's this in any way good for Americans and American companies?
Of course... Would be much nicer if things were not offloaded to China constantly as that's usually the first step in loss of the quality of a product.
You're answering your own question.
The proposed tariffs are reciprocal.
If China doesn't like them, they can lower the tariffs they impose on us, and we will respond in kind. Alternatively, China can keep being unfair, which should cause manufacturing to move away from China and either to the US or to somewhere with more equitable trade agreements. Such changes will take time to play out, of course. But Trump has been shouting about bringing manufacturing back to the US for years now. If he can do it, it'll be a huge boon to our economy.
If China lowered their tariffs, who of you thinks the USA would do likewise and not just keep the money as politicians love to do? I want a show of hands.
An eye for an eye does not leave the whole world blind.
The people who don't poke other people's eyes out to begin with don't get their eyes poked out in reciprocation.
If A eyepokes B, and B (or an agent acting on B's behalf, such as the state) eyepokes A, it ends. If A (or A's agent) then eyepokes B (or B's agent), it's a new case of eyepoking, not a reciprocal of the second.
While assholes will get angry at reciprocal (just) eyepoking punishments and then start new instances of eyepoking, non assholes will not.
If you apply this policy fairly and swiftly, the assholes and some of their victims will be left blind (this is unavoidable in any system with assholes). Most of the non assholes will be fine, and better off because all of the assholes will be crippled.
China imposes them on us. And the memo states that tariffs are to be put in place only when things are unfair. If China doesn't want these tariffs, they can drop their own.
The plan is to match tariffs, all the way down to 0. If you don't want these tariffs, you can ask China to drop their own, which would make us drop ours.
Fair is fair, is it not?
(Actually, it's not, because their workers are treated like slaves and they shit all over the environment. We should be imposing higher tariffs on them than they are on us while those things are true.)
Trump is a blowhard, but he's doing some good stuff. If he keeps it up, the blind, hateful liberals will be dragged kicking and screaming into a functional USA.
Slashdot Mirror
Facts discernible from your shitpost: You have never used a firearm.
You didn't even read his post, you fucking shitstain cuck.
And as for your firearm deaths per 100,000, since we're talking about criminal gun violence here, you might want to look at the chart of murder's by gun per 100,000 on Wikipedia [wikipedia.org] that doesn't include accidents or suicides. According to that list the top five states with the least numbers are Vermont (Grade: F), New Hampshire (Grade: D-), Hawaii (Grade: B+) , North Dakota (Grade: F) and Iowa (Grade: C-).
Overshadowed by the Pixel 2 XL having the same issue on every single screen.
That's basically cheaper than Netflix and on a better screen. Also, if the app is on a shared smartphone, that's one movie per day for any member of a family or set of roomies.
A bigger screen, sure. But no projection screen outside of a true IMAX theatre is going to be better than my direct view OLED. And I can't even tell you where the closest, true IMAX theater is, let alone what movies are available to watch on it.
Obama's campaign was not relying on such data. They were spoon fed all the data they asked for from Facebook, regardless of whether they had opted in on his campaign page. Where the fuck did you get that story from?
Otherwise I can just as easily Inspect Element on video streams and get the direct URL of it to download.
No you can't. Most major platforms have layers and layers of obfuscating javascript, and the actual resource URL isn't exposed in the DOM, and neither is the key you need to get a working response from the server.
And many platforms have obnoxious DRM on top of that.
Yup, Twitter's algorithm is useless. It's IMPOSSIBLE to find the latest shit now. It's not chronological, and it's not even deterministic.
Nope, he's right. Most recent FIRST. And include a full and obvious timestamp on it. I shouldn't have to hunt for a link to mouse over or some icon to click to expose a timestamp.
She needs her adrenochrome fix badly.
Thereâ(TM)s a difference between the speed limit and the speed appropriate for the conditions. The posted speed is a limit, not a target.
Not really. Many states have a basic speed law that dictates the speed limit is the safe and appropriate speed. The speed appropriate for the conditions IS the speed limit.
I think an attentive human would have hit her, but would have actually reacted (braking, swerving) and likely wouldn't have killed her.
The video shows her coming out of the shadows just in front of the car, but it was a horrible quality video, even for night driving.
Sometimes, there is no local option.
Why do you think that is?
Design and construction has already begun. I don't want a wall, but he's moving forward with it like he said.
Read the fucking memo you clown.
Section 1. Tariffs. (a) The Trade Representative should take all appropriate action under section 301 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2411) to address the acts, policies, and practices of China that are unreasonable or discriminatory and that burden or restrict U.S. commerce. The Trade Representative shall consider whether such action should include increased tariffs on goods from China.
Wait til he hears that the US is going to enforce its own immigration laws and control its own borders!
"The markets" are nothing more than a bunch of scared, reactionary gamblers that jump at every pin drop as if it were a grenade.
You're worried about the short term while ignoring the decades of economic fucking failure the US has had.
Everything Trump does is a childish ego response to prove he has a bigger dick.
Like the majority of EVERYTHING that is sold in the US is made in China. So how's this in any way good for Americans and American companies?
Of course ... Would be much nicer if things were not offloaded to China constantly as that's usually the first step in loss of the quality of a product.
You're answering your own question.
The proposed tariffs are reciprocal.
If China doesn't like them, they can lower the tariffs they impose on us, and we will respond in kind.
Alternatively, China can keep being unfair, which should cause manufacturing to move away from China and either to the US or to somewhere with more equitable trade agreements. Such changes will take time to play out, of course. But Trump has been shouting about bringing manufacturing back to the US for years now. If he can do it, it'll be a huge boon to our economy.
There are over 18,000 sealed indictments being worked on right now.
Would it not leave everyone blind?
If China lowered their tariffs, who of you thinks the USA would do likewise and not just keep the money as politicians love to do? I want a show of hands.
An eye for an eye does not leave the whole world blind.
The people who don't poke other people's eyes out to begin with don't get their eyes poked out in reciprocation.
If A eyepokes B, and B (or an agent acting on B's behalf, such as the state) eyepokes A, it ends.
If A (or A's agent) then eyepokes B (or B's agent), it's a new case of eyepoking, not a reciprocal of the second.
While assholes will get angry at reciprocal (just) eyepoking punishments and then start new instances of eyepoking, non assholes will not.
If you apply this policy fairly and swiftly, the assholes and some of their victims will be left blind (this is unavoidable in any system with assholes).
Most of the non assholes will be fine, and better off because all of the assholes will be crippled.
There's always a need to state the truth. More so when people are ignorant of it.
I miss the days of decency and cooperation.
Fact: You're not old enough to remember such times.
55 45 6 N 37 37 4 E
China imposes them on us. And the memo states that tariffs are to be put in place only when things are unfair. If China doesn't want these tariffs, they can drop their own.
The plan is to match tariffs, all the way down to 0. If you don't want these tariffs, you can ask China to drop their own, which would make us drop ours.
Fair is fair, is it not?
(Actually, it's not, because their workers are treated like slaves and they shit all over the environment. We should be imposing higher tariffs on them than they are on us while those things are true.)
They seem to be working for the countries that impose them on us.
Trump is a blowhard, but he's doing some good stuff. If he keeps it up, the blind, hateful liberals will be dragged kicking and screaming into a functional USA.