None of those model number indicate 9th generation "Core" architecture products. The first digit being an 8 indicates it's an 8th generation "Core" architecture product.
Chip makers do odd things when they get to 10, and Intel can blue the lines of each "generation" however they please, but nothing here indicates "9th generation".
No, you can't argue for any limit. Not without violating the obvious and simple rule that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
If you want a limit, amend the constitution. Anything else is illegal and throws the entirety of the constitution in jeopardy.
Further, they had explosives, ships, canons, fire, poisons, etc. The only limit on how many people you could kill was the number of people trying to stop you.
Nope. The text makes a statement of fact (that a well regulated militia is necessary). Whether you believe that to be true or not is irrelevant. Then it says the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. That right is not conditional upon your belief in or agreement with the previous fact.
I disagree with ownership of high-capacity military-style arms by civilians, and yes, I know what I'm talking about when I label guns (former Marine here). I believe civilians should be allowed to own handguns with less than 10 rounds, shotguns, and hunting/target rifles. Self defense is easily handled with a pump-action shotgun or a revolver. No one needs AR-15s and AK-pattern rifles. They are now beyond ever being labeled as "benign", no matter how the NRA or other asshat organization may try to market them for civilian use. Both rifles' origins are in killing. Full stop.
I will not be giving up my civilian guns, though. I live in rural Texas. Do you know how long it would take the police to arrive were I to have a home invasion? Like I tell people, when SECONDS count, the police are MINUTES away. I'll be keeping my 1897 Winchester trench gun and my Smith & Wesson.44 Special, thank you.
The second amendment isn't about self defense. It's about a heavily armed populace that enemies of the state, foreign or domestic, would fear.
A simple, guaranteed fix to turn this around would be to shut the internet down for 24 hours. I recommend Thanksgiving evening to Black Friday evening.
Hispanics came from Spain. That's it. It's what the word means.
You can't call people of native Central American or South American descent "Hispanic" without ignoring what the word "Hispanic" means. There was much mixing, to be sure, but that doesn't mean Hispanic includes those other ethnicities, it just means people in general have a diverse ethnic background. In a Venn diagram, Hispanic intersects with those, it does not contain them. Thus Hispanic refers to the "white" portion of someone's ethnicity.
Hispanics are white, but the media treats them as non-white. Until you get a George Zimmerman nutjob incident, then suddenly Hispanic is white again to drive the narrative.
As others have pointed out, this deals with the content of the ad, not the placement of the ad. Further, this is all "within constitutional limitations". You can't compel speech by forcing someone to place an ad in specific publications, locations, etc.
What a stupid claim. I know for a fact that the Sun is the center of our solar system and the Earth rotates around it based on the sceince of Astronomy. Please tell me how knowing this means I have no clue how science works.
Well, based on the "sceince" of astronomy, I "know" for a fact that the sun, Sol, is the center of the Solar system not because of science, but by definition. The center of the Solar system is Sol. That's why it's the Solar system. It is the system of Sol, the star that is our sun.
Further, Earth does not rotate around Sol, Earth orbits the Barycenter of the Sol system, which is very close to the Barycenter center of Earth and Sol, which is fairly close to the center of Sol.
Yarva Demonicus Erdogan. Change, change the form of man. Free the prince forever damned. Free the might from fleshy mire. Boil the blood in heart of fire. Gone, gone the form of man, Rise the demon Erdogan!
I knew what this video was going to be before I clicked it. It's almost entirely horseshit. So of course it's the most commonly referenced source whenever anyone brings up sugar.
The bonds get broken when the sucrose gets into contact with an acid, so basically as soon as it hits your stomach. That's why there's little difference in practice between eating HFCS or sucrose.
The acid is consumed by the process and must be replenished, which takes energy, hence why there's more than a little difference in practice between eating HFCS and sucrose.
Acid isn't consumed in breaking up fructose and glucose.
Amazing. You still don't get it. The post by Ol Olsoc (in response to the post by oh_my_080980980) was implying that things had already happened.
oh_my_080980980's post, referring to the ongoing mission to dig up any dirt on Trump regarding Russia:
When? They've been looking and looking and looking. Year and half now. Still nothing.
Ol Olsoc's response:
Your rock called, says you need to get back under it.
oh_my_080980980 is correctly pointing out that despite Hillary and the DNC and the media bending over backwards for a year and a half to find any shred of evidence directly linking Trump to some illegal dealings with Russia, nothing has been found.
Ol Olsoc made a post insinuating that the evidence/proof was obvious or old news and that one would have to have been living under a rock to not see it.
Yet he can't point to any evidence. Not one shred. Nor can you. All you can do is scream that it's obvious and that we're all fools for not seeing it. There's no procedure here because they've been on step 0 for a year and a half (as oh_my_080980980 pointed out). Procedures must proceed. They have no evidence of anything yet the way your ilk talks Trump's impeachment is right around the corner.
You can go back to rocking yourself in the fetal position now. Would you like a pacifier, or are you fine sucking on your thumb?
Me. Fire all the CxOs and kick out the directors and axe the managers and drop all the failing foreign branches / brands that no one know what they even do.
Put all focus back on calculators, then go from there.
At the very least I figure we can get a decent calculator out of it. It's been decades.
Women just can't cut it as CEOs. Just look at Carly Fiorina, Marissa Mayer, or Elizabeth Holmes. Women just usually aren't fit to be in a leadership position like that. They get hired because of their looks, then promoted because they can't actually do the job and firing them would bring a discrimination lawsuit. That's how women work their way up the ladder.
Are you seriously claiming those 3 were hired for their looks? Have you looked at them?
Why would you expect a reply when you didn't even comprehend the words you were replying to? Find a newspaper, dummy.
Oh, right, you can't understand that there is a process, or what step we're on. In your world, murder can never even happen because if you only have a dead body and no conviction, there is no reason to suspect a crime. You just keep asking if there was a conviction, and if not, no crime happened!
If it turns out that there is a formal investigation after all, and it is still in progress, are you going to apologize to oh_my_* and eat your hat? No, of course not! You'll never remember it if you're wrong and events prove it.
Which should we understand: that in your perfect world charges would be filed before an investigation, or that you just don't fucking comprehend a very simple multi-step process? I'm thinking, both.
I was responding to a post that insinuated that another user, who had questioned the lack of evidence for these allegations, had been living under a rock.
Saying someone has been "living under a rock" is an idiom that means the obviousness, oldness, or pervasiveness of some fact, trend, or event is so extreme that a person would have to have been far removed from society to not know about it.
I'll repeat my prior request:
Please show me the charges that have been filed against Donald Trump and the evidence to be presented. Also, when's the first hearing?
If you cannot provide such things, then they are not obvious, old, or pervasive. In fact, they likely do not exist. Thus Ol Olsoc, who insinuated that oh_my_080980980 had been living under a rock, is a fucking retard. As are you, for not understanding the situation.
Slashdot Mirror
None of those model number indicate 9th generation "Core" architecture products. The first digit being an 8 indicates it's an 8th generation "Core" architecture product.
Chip makers do odd things when they get to 10, and Intel can blue the lines of each "generation" however they please, but nothing here indicates "9th generation".
No, you can't argue for any limit. Not without violating the obvious and simple rule that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
If you want a limit, amend the constitution. Anything else is illegal and throws the entirety of the constitution in jeopardy.
Further, they had explosives, ships, canons, fire, poisons, etc. The only limit on how many people you could kill was the number of people trying to stop you.
Nope. The text makes a statement of fact (that a well regulated militia is necessary). Whether you believe that to be true or not is irrelevant. Then it says the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. That right is not conditional upon your belief in or agreement with the previous fact.
I disagree with ownership of high-capacity military-style arms by civilians, and yes, I know what I'm talking about when I label guns (former Marine here). I believe civilians should be allowed to own handguns with less than 10 rounds, shotguns, and hunting/target rifles. Self defense is easily handled with a pump-action shotgun or a revolver. No one needs AR-15s and AK-pattern rifles. They are now beyond ever being labeled as "benign", no matter how the NRA or other asshat organization may try to market them for civilian use. Both rifles' origins are in killing. Full stop.
I will not be giving up my civilian guns, though. I live in rural Texas. Do you know how long it would take the police to arrive were I to have a home invasion? Like I tell people, when SECONDS count, the police are MINUTES away. I'll be keeping my 1897 Winchester trench gun and my Smith & Wesson .44 Special, thank you.
The second amendment isn't about self defense. It's about a heavily armed populace that enemies of the state, foreign or domestic, would fear.
A simple, guaranteed fix to turn this around would be to shut the internet down for 24 hours. I recommend Thanksgiving evening to Black Friday evening.
No, it's legally protected speech. They have grievances with a public official.
No, you burn an effigy of him in front of his house, with an angry mob cheering.
It's a perfectly legal use of your right to speech guaranteed in the first amendment.
Can you answer the question? (No, you can't.)
Hispanics came from Spain. That's it. It's what the word means.
You can't call people of native Central American or South American descent "Hispanic" without ignoring what the word "Hispanic" means.
There was much mixing, to be sure, but that doesn't mean Hispanic includes those other ethnicities, it just means people in general have a diverse ethnic background. In a Venn diagram, Hispanic intersects with those, it does not contain them. Thus Hispanic refers to the "white" portion of someone's ethnicity.
Hispanics are white, but the media treats them as non-white. Until you get a George Zimmerman nutjob incident, then suddenly Hispanic is white again to drive the narrative.
As others have pointed out, this deals with the content of the ad, not the placement of the ad.
Further, this is all "within constitutional limitations". You can't compel speech by forcing someone to place an ad in specific publications, locations, etc.
They do, but when it happens you have to take the battery out, flip it, and put it back in. So your gaming session is interrupted.
If the Surface Book 3 has auto reverse we'll be set.
What a stupid claim. I know for a fact that the Sun is the center of our solar system and the Earth rotates around it based on the sceince of Astronomy. Please tell me how knowing this means I have no clue how science works.
Well, based on the "sceince" of astronomy, I "know" for a fact that the sun, Sol, is the center of the Solar system not because of science, but by definition. The center of the Solar system is Sol. That's why it's the Solar system. It is the system of Sol, the star that is our sun.
Further, Earth does not rotate around Sol, Earth orbits the Barycenter of the Sol system, which is very close to the Barycenter center of Earth and Sol, which is fairly close to the center of Sol.
Thank you, come again!
Found the millennial without taste in music.
You repeat yourself, sir!
Yarva Demonicus Erdogan.
Change, change the form of man.
Free the prince forever damned.
Free the might from fleshy mire.
Boil the blood in heart of fire.
Gone, gone the form of man,
Rise the demon Erdogan!
???
I knew what this video was going to be before I clicked it. It's almost entirely horseshit. So of course it's the most commonly referenced source whenever anyone brings up sugar.
The bonds get broken when the sucrose gets into contact with an acid, so basically as soon as it hits your stomach. That's why there's little difference in practice between eating HFCS or sucrose.
The acid is consumed by the process and must be replenished, which takes energy, hence why there's more than a little difference in practice between eating HFCS and sucrose.
Acid isn't consumed in breaking up fructose and glucose.
Literally none of them are poisons.
Shut the fuck up, you clown.
Amazing. You still don't get it. The post by Ol Olsoc (in response to the post by oh_my_080980980) was implying that things had already happened.
oh_my_080980980's post, referring to the ongoing mission to dig up any dirt on Trump regarding Russia:
When? They've been looking and looking and looking. Year and half now. Still nothing.
Ol Olsoc's response:
Your rock called, says you need to get back under it.
oh_my_080980980 is correctly pointing out that despite Hillary and the DNC and the media bending over backwards for a year and a half to find any shred of evidence directly linking Trump to some illegal dealings with Russia, nothing has been found.
Ol Olsoc made a post insinuating that the evidence/proof was obvious or old news and that one would have to have been living under a rock to not see it.
Yet he can't point to any evidence. Not one shred. Nor can you. All you can do is scream that it's obvious and that we're all fools for not seeing it. There's no procedure here because they've been on step 0 for a year and a half (as oh_my_080980980 pointed out). Procedures must proceed.
They have no evidence of anything yet the way your ilk talks Trump's impeachment is right around the corner.
You can go back to rocking yourself in the fetal position now. Would you like a pacifier, or are you fine sucking on your thumb?
Me. Fire all the CxOs and kick out the directors and axe the managers and drop all the failing foreign branches / brands that no one know what they even do.
Put all focus back on calculators, then go from there.
At the very least I figure we can get a decent calculator out of it. It's been decades.
HP networking products are all but dead anyway. It's all arriba / arugula / whatever gear now.
Women just can't cut it as CEOs. Just look at Carly Fiorina, Marissa Mayer, or Elizabeth Holmes. Women just usually aren't fit to be in a leadership position like that. They get hired because of their looks, then promoted because they can't actually do the job and firing them would bring a discrimination lawsuit. That's how women work their way up the ladder.
Are you seriously claiming those 3 were hired for their looks? Have you looked at them?
Dr. Lisa Su is doing quite well.
Why would you expect a reply when you didn't even comprehend the words you were replying to? Find a newspaper, dummy.
Oh, right, you can't understand that there is a process, or what step we're on. In your world, murder can never even happen because if you only have a dead body and no conviction, there is no reason to suspect a crime. You just keep asking if there was a conviction, and if not, no crime happened!
If it turns out that there is a formal investigation after all, and it is still in progress, are you going to apologize to oh_my_* and eat your hat? No, of course not! You'll never remember it if you're wrong and events prove it.
Which should we understand: that in your perfect world charges would be filed before an investigation, or that you just don't fucking comprehend a very simple multi-step process? I'm thinking, both.
I was responding to a post that insinuated that another user, who had questioned the lack of evidence for these allegations, had been living under a rock.
Saying someone has been "living under a rock" is an idiom that means the obviousness, oldness, or pervasiveness of some fact, trend, or event is so extreme that a person would have to have been far removed from society to not know about it.
I'll repeat my prior request:
Please show me the charges that have been filed against Donald Trump and the evidence to be presented. Also, when's the first hearing?
If you cannot provide such things, then they are not obvious, old, or pervasive. In fact, they likely do not exist. Thus Ol Olsoc, who insinuated that oh_my_080980980 had been living under a rock, is a fucking retard. As are you, for not understanding the situation.
Calling the Federalists and Anti-Federalists parties isn't really fair.
Why? Because it proves you wrong?