Slashdot Mirror


User: snarkh

snarkh's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
798
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 798

  1. Re:I think so, yes. on Are Computers Ready to Create Mathematical Proofs? · · Score: 1

    Much of linear algebra? What basis do you have for saying that, except for that conjecture, which is rather marginal, after all.

  2. Re:Don't Cross The Streams on NPR's Car Talk Switches Back To RealAudio · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Methinks someone doesn't have a sense of humour. Go figure.

    And who would that mystery person be? Go figure.

  3. Re:Don't Cross The Streams on NPR's Car Talk Switches Back To RealAudio · · Score: 3, Funny
    Nice to know that I can listen to Click and Clack on my computer without being constantly bombarded with pop-ups from a piece of annoyware.

    I thought those guys were a piece of annoyware. Go figure.

  4. Re:a good start on Nature Debate on Open Scientific Journals · · Score: 1


    Right, depends on the area. If you are doing theoretical research in CS or math and don't have a grant to cover the expenses or have limited grant money, $1500 might seem like a lot. In the experimental areas, as you say, the cost of the project is a lot higher, so $1500 is just a minor expense.

  5. Re:Not all journals are equal on Nature Debate on Open Scientific Journals · · Score: 1


    Yes, yes, milking the readership is what much of it is about... And usually they take the copyright too.

  6. Re:Why they charge so much on Nature Debate on Open Scientific Journals · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you have only 2000 readers, you're going to have to charge a lot from each reader to cover the costs.

    Actually that is not quite right. They did a study in math journals and found out that top quality journals with similar readership (e.g. Inventiones and the Annals) charge wildly different subscriptions.

  7. Re:a good start on Nature Debate on Open Scientific Journals · · Score: 1


    So what do researchers without grants do?

  8. Re:a good start on Nature Debate on Open Scientific Journals · · Score: 1


    Interesting. Are you in biology? In CS people typically don't have to pay.

  9. Re:a good start on Nature Debate on Open Scientific Journals · · Score: 1


    It is not about institutions, but individual researchers. Your institution typically will not cover the cost.

  10. Re:a good start on Nature Debate on Open Scientific Journals · · Score: 1


    That is not the case for most journals, as far as I know. However authors often have to pay for color illustrations.

  11. Re:a good start on Nature Debate on Open Scientific Journals · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Author pays is an awfule model. People from poor countries, graduate students and researchers without grants are unlikely to pay $1500/paper.

    What I don't understand is why journals charge so much for subscriptions. After all the reviewers do their work for free, so their only expense is the editorial stuff and printing. These are expensive but not expensive enough to justify the exorbitatn subscription charges.

  12. Re:I expect... on Study: MP3 Sharing Not Serious Threat To CD Sales · · Score: 4, Funny
    as anybody who knows anything about advertising will tell you, the "coolness" factor of an ad often is only a minor role in its effectiveness. i could probably watch that doritos commercial with that girl at the laundromat all day, but i still don't buy doritos. rather, factors such as repitition and subconscious awareness building are more important.

    Wow, your logic is mindboggling.

  13. net increase on Nuclear Fusion Real Soon Now · · Score: 1


    I think they have already achieved a net increase of energy using fusion. It's called H-bomb.

  14. Re:brute force terraforming on Mars Terraforming Debate · · Score: 1


    And how exactly are you going to steer celestial bodies into Mars?

  15. Re:What happens when life IS found on Methane on Mars? · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What exactly do you mean by the creation myth - why should the creation happen only on Earth and not elsewhere as well? I think most religions do not insist on literal interpretations of their texts.

    On the other hand extraterrestial intelligence would be a much thornier problem (as far as Christianity is concerned, in any case) - did the aliens have the original sin and redenmption, etc.

  16. Re:Feasibiliy of High Speed Travel on X-43A Hits Mach 7 · · Score: 1
    Well,the horizontal component of the force will be equal to 1G times the mass of the passenger.

    The absolute value (which is 1.4 G approx) is not important as we always have to bear the force of gravity in any case.

  17. Re:What happens when life IS found on Methane on Mars? · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Why should there be religious ramifications to finding bacterial life on Mars?

  18. Re:Feasibiliy of High Speed Travel on X-43A Hits Mach 7 · · Score: 1


    1G is not a comfortable acceleration for passenger travel.

  19. Re:Enough already on Is {pluto|sedna} A Planet? · · Score: 1


    I will contemplate what you said.

  20. Re:Enough already on Is {pluto|sedna} A Planet? · · Score: 1
    You might be right. There is definitely no way to experience something as large as a planet directly.

    In some sense language is a way to compress the world (i.e. build a model that fits in one's head).

  21. Re:Is not a trillion, what is it? on Debunking the Trillion-Dollar Space Myth · · Score: 1
    Well, if $500 bil is OK, I don't see a problem with $1 tril.

    My problem with the program is that it was an election year thing to be dropped when it turned out to be unpopular. The precise numbers are not so important, as far as I am concerned.

  22. Re:Is not a trillion, what is it? on Debunking the Trillion-Dollar Space Myth · · Score: 1
    Once it hit the news, everyone else copied it, and the public perception grew that this would be a fiscally irresponsible program.

    So if it were only $500 billion, that would be fiscally responsible?

  23. Re:Nuked not on U.S. Prepares to Get Nuked · · Score: 2, Interesting
    When I was a kid I knew all too well about American ICBMs pointing at my city. Used to have nightmares about it, in fact.

    It is time for the US to lead the world to eventual nuclear disarmament. Who else will? Meanwhile, US is the only country (I believe) which has not renounced the first use yet. Instead of commiting to disarmament, the current administration is busy spending on the order of .5 bil for "bunker-busting" nukes development...

  24. Re:Nuked not on U.S. Prepares to Get Nuked · · Score: 1
    I don't think it is implausible at all, in fact I think it is quite possible, unfortunately.

    However there is nothing to be proud or smug about. The talk about parking lot is objectionable.

  25. Re:Nuked not on U.S. Prepares to Get Nuked · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    In most cases this will be a parking lot after we are through.

    In other words, you are saying US will commit mass murder in revenge?