For a dyslexic friendly font that actually looks like it was designed with input from dyslexic people try Dislexie http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyslexie
Sock puppet much? Dyslexie is the closed-source font OpenDyslexic is based on (which you'd find if you actually read through the original link).
Eh . . . I've talked to three people recently, who, without prompting from me (not a Mac partisan, but vocally anti-Windows and pro-anything-else, i.e. Mac, Ubuntu, RedHat . . . vintage Minix . . . *grin*) purchased Macs rather than Vista-preloaded PCs as their next computer upgrade. No, those with hardware investment may not switch en masse, but the short upgrade cycle of Windows PCs makes for ample opportunity to move on to other hardware.
And besides, Leopard kills Vista. Heck, Leopard eats Vista! http://www.flickr.com/photos/16424953@N04/1762035991/
*snerk*
That reminds me of the old "How many Microsoft programmers does it take to change a lightbulb?" answer: "None. They just declare darkness to be the standard."
Well, for this and many other reasons, Leopard kills Vista. Heck, Leopard eats Vista! http://www.flickr.com/photos/16424953@N04/1762035991/
No, it's the people who realize that the server OS is the only Windows available that even has a smattering of real security. Face it, Leopard kills Vista, in security, as well as every other department. Heck, Leopard eats Vista! http://www.flickr.com/photos/16424953@N04/1762035991/
Different OS vendors "working together" on security isn't feasible even in concept. There are relatively few advances in security pioneered by OS vendors. Rather, what is already known about security must be implemented. "Security" isn't a service offered by an OS, and so is impossible to fully abstract. While vendors can work together on things such as communications protocols and interoperability, security is a matter of putting locks on doors. The locks and doors are known (and as new doors in need of locking become known, information is generally freely-available): but there's nothing, short of writing Microsoft's code for them, that Apple can do to help with Windows security.
And besides, Leopard kills Vista on more fronts than just security. Heck, Leopard eats Vista! http://www.flickr.com/photos/16424953@N04/1762035991/
Slashdot Mirror
For a dyslexic friendly font that actually looks like it was designed with input from dyslexic people try Dislexie http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyslexie
Sock puppet much? Dyslexie is the closed-source font OpenDyslexic is based on (which you'd find if you actually read through the original link).
*snerk* Yep, Leopard pretty much kills Vista! http://digg.com/apple/Leopard_Kills_Vista
Yay! Now Leopard officially kills Vista! http://digg.com/apple/Leopard_Kills_Vista
Eh . . . they don't bother. Leopard kills Vista. Heck, Leopard pretty much eats Vista! http://digg.com/apple/Leopard_Kills_Vista
For Mac . . . or for the adventurous, Linux! Face it, Leopard officially kills Vista. http://digg.com/apple/Leopard_Kills_Vista
More proof that Mac OS eats Windows. And now, more than ever, because today, Leopard kills Vista! http://digg.com/apple/Leopard_Kills_Vista
Eh . . . I've talked to three people recently, who, without prompting from me (not a Mac partisan, but vocally anti-Windows and pro-anything-else, i.e. Mac, Ubuntu, RedHat . . . vintage Minix . . . *grin*) purchased Macs rather than Vista-preloaded PCs as their next computer upgrade. No, those with hardware investment may not switch en masse, but the short upgrade cycle of Windows PCs makes for ample opportunity to move on to other hardware. And besides, Leopard kills Vista. Heck, Leopard eats Vista! http://www.flickr.com/photos/16424953@N04/1762035991/
*snerk* That reminds me of the old "How many Microsoft programmers does it take to change a lightbulb?" answer: "None. They just declare darkness to be the standard." Well, for this and many other reasons, Leopard kills Vista. Heck, Leopard eats Vista! http://www.flickr.com/photos/16424953@N04/1762035991/
No, it's the people who realize that the server OS is the only Windows available that even has a smattering of real security. Face it, Leopard kills Vista, in security, as well as every other department. Heck, Leopard eats Vista! http://www.flickr.com/photos/16424953@N04/1762035991/
Different OS vendors "working together" on security isn't feasible even in concept. There are relatively few advances in security pioneered by OS vendors. Rather, what is already known about security must be implemented. "Security" isn't a service offered by an OS, and so is impossible to fully abstract. While vendors can work together on things such as communications protocols and interoperability, security is a matter of putting locks on doors. The locks and doors are known (and as new doors in need of locking become known, information is generally freely-available): but there's nothing, short of writing Microsoft's code for them, that Apple can do to help with Windows security. And besides, Leopard kills Vista on more fronts than just security. Heck, Leopard eats Vista! http://www.flickr.com/photos/16424953@N04/1762035991/
*snerk* Yeah, especially when Microsoft customers want to downgrade back to XP, Leopard kills Vista. Heck, Leopard eats Vista for lunch! http://www.flickr.com/photos/16424953@N04/1762035991/