Best hurry home, then, because the smelly, lardy googly-eyed weirdo from Amazon left a package on your doorstep. Or do they have entry access to your building/house?
The truly rich and even the mildly affluent often get into the car in their garage and get out of it in a parking garage where there's an elevator or a skyway to their office.
I am a strong advocate for pedestrians. The concept of 'jaywalking' should be abolished in cities. I live in a fairly crappy area of the country where the car is 'king' and it's risky to even take the dog on a walk directly from my house. We drive to a parkway and walk starting from there. Cars are stinking noisy things when I'm walking adjacent to roadways.
Clearly the solution is to spread out, and not concentrate in dense cities. Cities are important marketplaces, and density there is a positive attribute. They are not practical for general purpose dwelling spaces. Residential housing should be moved out, and only market-function occupations kept in the city. This can be done by simply letting market forces play. There will be less traffic as a result.
No, I don't mean high density public housing along mass transit corridors. That's what people who use the 'sprawl' dogwhistle usually campaign for.
There are so many possibilities when freedom and not prescriptiveness is embraced. I like ideas like transport pods. People detest giving up their personal space for mass transit.
One solution would be for lower-speed 'pods' to transport people from their dwellings to transit hubs. There, the local undercarriage is disconnected and the pods go on high speed rail carriages. People could buy as luxurious or as cheap a 'pod' as they wish, and they could be high denstiy stacked in the central city after being disconnected from the rail carriage. This is just an example. Humanity is creative, when their options are not prescribed by 'social planners' and bureaucrats.
Apple is trying to become a music streamer and they wanted to close the analog hole. Rigid DRM is now just a software patch away. (Plus they will offer the same sort of additional arguments they used to for why a one button mouse was superior)
The Apple 1 was only available as a kit. It was a single pc board and you had to come up with your own power transformer (a heavy item to ship). You also had to attach your own parallel-strobed ascii keyboard. There was a patch by at the keyboard input to add inverters if needed for your keyboard. The Apple 1s most commonly seen for big-bux sales today are augmented kits with the add-on parts the original owner came up with.
I certainly don't depend on NY City or State government. I thought you were one of those people who emphasized the differences in forms of government. (Left/right and all that)
We have the Internet now. You don't need to live in a metropolis any longer to immerse yourself in mass culture. Your crowded diseased cities are obsolete.
Oh well. Sounds like a problem located within state boundaries. It's sure a good thing no Federal dollars at all are needed. We outsiders can watch. Shoot entertaining documentaries and charge admission if you want us to pay.
At least a few of those 'five times' activities are not daily activities. So tone down your multiplication. Simpler arithmetic will reduce the shrillness of your message.
I don't work anywhere that has subways as an alternative way to get there. In fact, I travel about 3 miles to work, on the other side of a Midwest small town.
Slashdot Mirror
Without any 'climate change' at all but continual fertilizer flow, red tide would continue.
Would my middle finger suffice? No, you can't keep it. Just stare at it and gibber some more.
Fukushima is on the main island of Japan, not on an atoll.
You don't need to dredge the plastic out of the ocean. Catch it at the river flows in the Asian countries who are dumping most of it into the sea.
It's not mostly coming from the West.
'Settled science' is the kind of thing someone who is non-scientific would say. Science is always un-settled. We learn more every day.
The 'that is all' you tacked on is further evidence that you've closed your mind to the scientific method. 'All' is never even on the horizon.
Best hurry home, then, because the smelly, lardy googly-eyed weirdo from Amazon left a package on your doorstep. Or do they have entry access to your building/house?
The truly rich and even the mildly affluent often get into the car in their garage and get out of it in a parking garage where there's an elevator or a skyway to their office.
I am a strong advocate for pedestrians. The concept of 'jaywalking' should be abolished in cities. I live in a fairly crappy area of the country where the car is 'king' and it's risky to even take the dog on a walk directly from my house. We drive to a parkway and walk starting from there. Cars are stinking noisy things when I'm walking adjacent to roadways.
Partisanship?
Clearly the solution is to spread out, and not concentrate in dense cities. Cities are important marketplaces, and density there is a positive attribute. They are not practical for general purpose dwelling spaces. Residential housing should be moved out, and only market-function occupations kept in the city. This can be done by simply letting market forces play. There will be less traffic as a result.
No, I don't mean high density public housing along mass transit corridors. That's what people who use the 'sprawl' dogwhistle usually campaign for.
There are so many possibilities when freedom and not prescriptiveness is embraced. I like ideas like transport pods. People detest giving up their personal space for mass transit.
One solution would be for lower-speed 'pods' to transport people from their dwellings to transit hubs. There, the local undercarriage is disconnected and the pods go on high speed rail carriages. People could buy as luxurious or as cheap a 'pod' as they wish, and they could be high denstiy stacked in the central city after being disconnected from the rail carriage. This is just an example. Humanity is creative, when their options are not prescribed by 'social planners' and bureaucrats.
Except it only runs a toy operating system (not even real MacOS) and lacks a filesystem. So the things it can do don't really include real work.
But if you qualify with 'the things it can do' you might be able to make a case.
The CPU in mobile devices has it's ram bottlenecked before it's even encapsulated to be attached to a PCB.
The article says it was included under a different name with Corel Draw in the 90s. Probably Corel Draw 3.0.
The deplorables have has it a long time.
Apple is trying to become a music streamer and they wanted to close the analog hole. Rigid DRM is now just a software patch away. (Plus they will offer the same sort of additional arguments they used to for why a one button mouse was superior)
Clue: nerds don't care if tech companies are profitable. Maybe you came here by mistake and meant to be reading Barron's or Forbes.
The Apple 1 was only available as a kit. It was a single pc board and you had to come up with your own power transformer (a heavy item to ship). You also had to attach your own parallel-strobed ascii keyboard. There was a patch by at the keyboard input to add inverters if needed for your keyboard. The Apple 1s most commonly seen for big-bux sales today are augmented kits with the add-on parts the original owner came up with.
I certainly don't depend on NY City or State government. I thought you were one of those people who emphasized the differences in forms of government. (Left/right and all that)
We have the Internet now. You don't need to live in a metropolis any longer to immerse yourself in mass culture. Your crowded diseased cities are obsolete.
Oh well. Sounds like a problem located within state boundaries. It's sure a good thing no Federal dollars at all are needed. We outsiders can watch. Shoot entertaining documentaries and charge admission if you want us to pay.
Taxes? Where do these magic 'tax dollars' come from?
Do govt. bureaucrats get to skim some off?
Eventually Uber runs out of people stupid enough to use their services to 'share their car' with strangers.
Uber's exit strategy is the demographic data they will eventually sell or lease when things settle out and the mining costs rise.
At least a few of those 'five times' activities are not daily activities. So tone down your multiplication. Simpler arithmetic will reduce the shrillness of your message.
I don't work anywhere that has subways as an alternative way to get there. In fact, I travel about 3 miles to work, on the other side of a Midwest small town.
You don't. Unless you're paying the county tax out here. And why would you?
I see you used a dogwhistle, 'sprawl.'
Let me guess. They drive the operating costs up?
Union bosses travel in good old Detroit Iron. You won't catch them on the subway.