Oh, great! Now you've convinced us that this virus is going to suck all of that massive amount energy from the surrounding water causing the oceans to freeze (until Mr. Global Explosion lights his match). Concurrent doomsday scenarios, where one doomsday triggers other concomitant doomsdays: 1) If the lack of water doesn't get us, then 2) the massize cooling will get us, or else 3) the Hindenberg-like atmosphere fire will surely finish us off.
He cannot even write a logical, rational thought supporting why programmers need to know more than a casual level of statistics. He just rants about blue sunsets and writes the f-word a lot.
Still there is a fundamental illogic all throughout your statements. The stated purpose of the LHC is to recreate the conditions that existed in the first split second after the (original) Big Bang. To justify the safety of the LHC, you are implying that above me right now (or perhaps later tonight), if I had just the right aim and timing on my Look Upward device, I would be able to see occurring in nature the very conditions that existed in the first split second after the (original) Big Bang. You are essentially claiming that there are frequent natural recurrences of the first split second after the Big Bang happening around us every so often for the past billions of years. Now with good aim and good timing, you say that I can look upward and see this Daily Big Bangette. I thought we were having enough trouble salvaging with dark matter etc the existence of the original Big Bang. Now I am glad to hear that we are convinced that there are plenty of Daily Big Bangettes happening, and I am missing all of these due to bad aim and/or bad timing glitches in my Look Upward device.
You see, I reject your premise: same energy alone doesn't count. Exact same combination of conditions in all metrics in aggregate as a tuple is what counts. Regardless of the model of physics, there exists some tuple where a few metrics in that tuple include: 1) amount of energy and 2) distance-extent (e.g., linear distance, area, volume, etc for how ever many dimensions) over which that energy exists. Your "same energy" collisions overhead that you want me to look at in my Look Upward device are an extraordinarily-sparse distribution of that "same energy" (in however many dimensions). The LHC tries to recreate some important parameters of that tuple, more than merely "same energy". I reject your implied claim that the naturally-occurring "same energy" collisions of particles recreate en masse all of the same parameters of that tuple that the LHC will be recreating. Similarity to the Big Bang is not merely "same energy" but rather such similarity is defined as recreating multiple parameters (and perhaps all parameters) of the original Big Bang's tuple. You are so incorrectly focused on only one metric in that tuple. You have become so well educated in a narrow topic that you forget to think in the large. There are more parameters in space and time, Habigio, than ever dreamt of in your focus on energy alone.
I am sorry to say, but your little Daily Big Bangettes of "same energy" cosmic collisions meet my definition of uninteresting tourist trap, where I do not want to spend my precious vacation time. I still want to see the naturally-occurring real deal of any single one of these millions of examples of your oft-mentioned naturally-occurring first split second of the Big Bang while I am on vacation. I don't have a time machine to go back to see the (original) Big Bang; plus it sounds, like a moth-to-the-flame, I would get my wings burned off by all of that energy. The Look Upward device not only has bad aim and bad timing, but, when rarely successful, only lets me see naturally-occurring poor-quality knock-offs of merely one parameter of the tuple. Where can I go on my eco-vacation to see the full multiple-parameter tuple of metrics that the LHC will be creating (metrics other than "same energy") instead occurring out in the field in their natural habitat. Let's call this animal in the wild: The Full-Tupled Big Bangers. The LHC is trying to capture several of these Full-Tupled Big Bangers for its physics-zoo on the banks of Lake Geneva. Switzerland, I have been there done that on past vacations. Zoos, been there done that too. Where can I go on my eco-tourist vacation to see the Full-Tupled Big Bangers in their natural habitat outside of Lake Geneva's zoo? You see, I think that The Full-Tupled Big Bangers went extinct billions of years ago. The LHC will not merely be capturing a commonplace wild animal; rather, the LHC will be attempting to resurrect from the dead the long-extinct species of Full-Tupled Big
It is not merely about the "same energy". It is about: the exact same combination of conditions as will exist within the LHC. Please show me where on Earth I would find the natural combination of conditions that are the same as will exist within the operational LHC. I would like to buy an airplane ticket and go there to see this proleptic LHC-in-nature that predates the LHC. That way I can get comfortable about the artificial re-creation of what is so commonplace in nature.
By their own admission, the LHC researchers are recreating a combination of stimuli and outcomes that existed an instant after the Big Bang. I would like to buy an airplane ticket to see these frequent Big Bangs on Earth. They sound pretty cool. Since you know with such certainty that the LHC is merely artificially recreating a combination of stimui and outcomes that has naturally occurred on Earth numerous times over a 4.5-billion-year period, please tell me where I can see the daily Big Bangs on Earth (other than the LHC on the day that it really does go Big Bang). I have some vacation time saved up. They sound like fun vistas to see. Perhaps since these 1-instant-after-Big-Bang occurrences are so frequent in nature on Earth, perhaps I won't need to travel far. Perhaps one of these natural Big Bangs on Earth is across town or just down-state from here.
Remember I am not interested in seeing some "same energy" knock-off; I don't have that much vacation time to waste on such pedestrian unexciting stuff. I want to see only the really good stuff on vacation: I want to see one of the instants after the Big Bang that have occurred so frequently on Earth for 4.5 billion years as you claim.
cyclic illogic #1
1A) Because the Big Bang is perfectly proven undisputed fact obtained during a direct telephone call to God The Creator himself, the fact that the Big Bang occurred just like we know for certain that it did logically implies that these little black holes dissipate. versus
1B) We have spent billions of Euros on this thing to prove whether the Big Bang occurred or not, because we are not sure that the facts support a key criterion on which the Big Bang depends.
cyclic illogic #2
2A) Because input stimuli in the LHC happen in nature all of the time, the LHC is perfectly safe. versus
2B) We have spent billions of Euros on this thing, because we have never observed the outcomes of the LHC in nature.
1A and 1B cannot both be true. 2A and 2B cannot both be true.
To produce different outcomes than seen in nature, evidently the LHC actually does induce different input stimuli than possible outside of the laboratory, or else we would have already been able to observe the LHC's wonderful outputs already in nature. Even people with very high IQs can be very stupidly illogical. Book smarts are not street smarts!
My local Walmart now sells only TVs (including CRT Emerson & Durabrand/Funai models) that have an digital ATSC DTV tuner (not HDTV). There was not a single NTSC-only TV for sale there one month ago. Although I don't remember the exact price of NTSC models at Walmart in recent years/months, the price of a CRT-based ATSC DTV seemed to be comparable to what I remember they sold NTSC TVs for. For example, because I had an existing platform-style small-TV wall-mount already installed, a month ago I bought a Durabrand 19-inch CRT-based ATSC DTV manufactured by Funai for $129 plus sales tax. 19-inch CRT NTSC TVs could not have been much cheaper than that in recent years.
It has the most out-of-vogue highly-curved very-much-NOT-flatscreen CRT that I have seen since the 1960s, but it works well with a crystal-clear 4x3 ATSC SD digital picture, although I choose the letterbox mode most of the time.
Slashdot Mirror
Oh, great! Now you've convinced us that this virus is going to suck all of that massive amount energy from the surrounding water causing the oceans to freeze (until Mr. Global Explosion lights his match). Concurrent doomsday scenarios, where one doomsday triggers other concomitant doomsdays: 1) If the lack of water doesn't get us, then 2) the massize cooling will get us, or else 3) the Hindenberg-like atmosphere fire will surely finish us off.
He cannot even write a logical, rational thought supporting why programmers need to know more than a casual level of statistics. He just rants about blue sunsets and writes the f-word a lot.
Campaigning against PDF in any way might effectively equate to implicitly campaigning for Microsoft's XML Paper Specification (XPS)
Still there is a fundamental illogic all throughout your statements. The stated purpose of the LHC is to recreate the conditions that existed in the first split second after the (original) Big Bang. To justify the safety of the LHC, you are implying that above me right now (or perhaps later tonight), if I had just the right aim and timing on my Look Upward device, I would be able to see occurring in nature the very conditions that existed in the first split second after the (original) Big Bang. You are essentially claiming that there are frequent natural recurrences of the first split second after the Big Bang happening around us every so often for the past billions of years. Now with good aim and good timing, you say that I can look upward and see this Daily Big Bangette. I thought we were having enough trouble salvaging with dark matter etc the existence of the original Big Bang. Now I am glad to hear that we are convinced that there are plenty of Daily Big Bangettes happening, and I am missing all of these due to bad aim and/or bad timing glitches in my Look Upward device.
You see, I reject your premise: same energy alone doesn't count. Exact same combination of conditions in all metrics in aggregate as a tuple is what counts. Regardless of the model of physics, there exists some tuple where a few metrics in that tuple include: 1) amount of energy and 2) distance-extent (e.g., linear distance, area, volume, etc for how ever many dimensions) over which that energy exists. Your "same energy" collisions overhead that you want me to look at in my Look Upward device are an extraordinarily-sparse distribution of that "same energy" (in however many dimensions). The LHC tries to recreate some important parameters of that tuple, more than merely "same energy". I reject your implied claim that the naturally-occurring "same energy" collisions of particles recreate en masse all of the same parameters of that tuple that the LHC will be recreating. Similarity to the Big Bang is not merely "same energy" but rather such similarity is defined as recreating multiple parameters (and perhaps all parameters) of the original Big Bang's tuple. You are so incorrectly focused on only one metric in that tuple. You have become so well educated in a narrow topic that you forget to think in the large. There are more parameters in space and time, Habigio, than ever dreamt of in your focus on energy alone.
I am sorry to say, but your little Daily Big Bangettes of "same energy" cosmic collisions meet my definition of uninteresting tourist trap, where I do not want to spend my precious vacation time. I still want to see the naturally-occurring real deal of any single one of these millions of examples of your oft-mentioned naturally-occurring first split second of the Big Bang while I am on vacation. I don't have a time machine to go back to see the (original) Big Bang; plus it sounds, like a moth-to-the-flame, I would get my wings burned off by all of that energy. The Look Upward device not only has bad aim and bad timing, but, when rarely successful, only lets me see naturally-occurring poor-quality knock-offs of merely one parameter of the tuple. Where can I go on my eco-vacation to see the full multiple-parameter tuple of metrics that the LHC will be creating (metrics other than "same energy") instead occurring out in the field in their natural habitat. Let's call this animal in the wild: The Full-Tupled Big Bangers. The LHC is trying to capture several of these Full-Tupled Big Bangers for its physics-zoo on the banks of Lake Geneva. Switzerland, I have been there done that on past vacations. Zoos, been there done that too. Where can I go on my eco-tourist vacation to see the Full-Tupled Big Bangers in their natural habitat outside of Lake Geneva's zoo? You see, I think that The Full-Tupled Big Bangers went extinct billions of years ago. The LHC will not merely be capturing a commonplace wild animal; rather, the LHC will be attempting to resurrect from the dead the long-extinct species of Full-Tupled Big
By their own admission, the LHC researchers are recreating a combination of stimuli and outcomes that existed an instant after the Big Bang. I would like to buy an airplane ticket to see these frequent Big Bangs on Earth. They sound pretty cool. Since you know with such certainty that the LHC is merely artificially recreating a combination of stimui and outcomes that has naturally occurred on Earth numerous times over a 4.5-billion-year period, please tell me where I can see the daily Big Bangs on Earth (other than the LHC on the day that it really does go Big Bang). I have some vacation time saved up. They sound like fun vistas to see. Perhaps since these 1-instant-after-Big-Bang occurrences are so frequent in nature on Earth, perhaps I won't need to travel far. Perhaps one of these natural Big Bangs on Earth is across town or just down-state from here.
Remember I am not interested in seeing some "same energy" knock-off; I don't have that much vacation time to waste on such pedestrian unexciting stuff. I want to see only the really good stuff on vacation: I want to see one of the instants after the Big Bang that have occurred so frequently on Earth for 4.5 billion years as you claim.
cyclic illogic #1
1A) Because the Big Bang is perfectly proven undisputed fact obtained during a direct telephone call to God The Creator himself, the fact that the Big Bang occurred just like we know for certain that it did logically implies that these little black holes dissipate.
versus
1B) We have spent billions of Euros on this thing to prove whether the Big Bang occurred or not, because we are not sure that the facts support a key criterion on which the Big Bang depends.
cyclic illogic #2
2A) Because input stimuli in the LHC happen in nature all of the time, the LHC is perfectly safe.
versus
2B) We have spent billions of Euros on this thing, because we have never observed the outcomes of the LHC in nature.
1A and 1B cannot both be true. 2A and 2B cannot both be true.
To produce different outcomes than seen in nature, evidently the LHC actually does induce different input stimuli than possible outside of the laboratory, or else we would have already been able to observe the LHC's wonderful outputs already in nature. Even people with very high IQs can be very stupidly illogical. Book smarts are not street smarts!
The complete answer: Eat less. Move more.
perhaps for many of the same reasons that OpenWatcom it not yet a serious competitor to the GNU Compiler Collection
My local Walmart now sells only TVs (including CRT Emerson & Durabrand/Funai models) that have an digital ATSC DTV tuner (not HDTV). There was not a single NTSC-only TV for sale there one month ago. Although I don't remember the exact price of NTSC models at Walmart in recent years/months, the price of a CRT-based ATSC DTV seemed to be comparable to what I remember they sold NTSC TVs for. For example, because I had an existing platform-style small-TV wall-mount already installed, a month ago I bought a Durabrand 19-inch CRT-based ATSC DTV manufactured by Funai for $129 plus sales tax. 19-inch CRT NTSC TVs could not have been much cheaper than that in recent years.
It has the most out-of-vogue highly-curved very-much-NOT-flatscreen CRT that I have seen since the 1960s, but it works well with a crystal-clear 4x3 ATSC SD digital picture, although I choose the letterbox mode most of the time.