Those who follow closely the evolution of technology say it will happen around 2030-2050.
Maybe Tue Jan 19 03:14:07 UTC 2038 ?
But I'm confident it will be a positive change.
As long as it's unsigned.
Unix Millennium bug, or Y2K38 by analogy to the Y2K problem, known as the millennium bug.
Already had to happen, but there was nothing to see.
Of course, as every good advance you will be free to chose to either embrace it or continue your life the old way.
Like the Amish, they are free to do what they want.
Right now the computers are at insect levels and as insects there isn't much emotions to be detected. Give them more computing power and something may come out.
Slashdot Mirror
Depends on just how much smarter than us they are...
Exponentially. But I think the future will be an integration, rather then 2 separated races. Upload
Those who follow closely the evolution of technology say it will happen around 2030-2050.
Maybe Tue Jan 19 03:14:07 UTC 2038 ?
But I'm confident it will be a positive change.
As long as it's unsigned.
Unix Millennium bug, or Y2K38 by analogy to the Y2K problem, known as the millennium bug. Already had to happen, but there was nothing to see. Of course, as every good advance you will be free to chose to either embrace it or continue your life the old way. Like the Amish, they are free to do what they want.
Based on what can you assume this?
Right now the computers are at insect levels and as insects there isn't much emotions to be detected. Give them more computing power and something may come out.
You will the first one to die in the AI revolution. :)
They don't, I use spell checker and it failed to report the error, they still need to learn. :)
lol
Those who follow closely the evolution of technology say it will happen around 2030-2050.
But I'm confident it will be a positive change.
If they are smarter then use, they know how stupid war is.
Nah, I'm a nice person.
There is a fine article on Anand about LAG
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3601
And yes, I do care about this numbers, hell I even analyse the telemetry when I'm driving.
I don't have your hardware, so there is no point in compering the solutions.
GTA 4, ARMA II, Prototype, the new one, not all of them ofc.
It could, but they are assholes and want it for themselves.
Open the technology with ATI and we can talk. Nah, the open standard approach will work in the end.
I have the same gfx an o/c 4850, yet I fail at some to reach 60FPS.
:)
Obviously you are some kind of super wizard class hacker.
Then why upgrade when there is no advantage?
Why spend money when you don't get any benefit?
That's my point, you don't need to upgrade for DX9 games, XP is fine.
I'm talking about games here, so don't drag me into something else.
Yeah, physics is cool, but it needs a new generation CPU. :(
It's about the games, I use the OS that gives me the best FPS, even 1 or 2 is enough for me to pick one over the other.
I play on Internet, you need to squeeze every ms to be first.
ATi 4850 o/c 680 / 1000
XP SP3, no added software. I keep it clean, it uses only 150mb of ram at start.
A professional gaming machine.
http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/windows_7_gaming_performance/page4.asp
Why, will it take over some of the CPU job?
The GPU can't do much when the CPU is at 100%.
ATI 4850 overclocked ofc :)
Win7 is still not out and I don't waste time with beta OS.
I'll try it when SP1 comes out. Hopefully by I'll have a better CPU.
Source: Google XP, Vista, Win7 DX9
Explain this to my CPU when he is at 100%.