Meant to add before my itchy submit finger, some of those do require a sender identity. If you have a DoS stream incoming that is not DDoS, (or a DDoS using your network as a reflector), you need to have an identifiable source to tell the ISP to blackhole. Lacking this ability, anyone with a fatter pipe than yours can prevent other people on the network from reaching your service. This is one example where a network identity is required to maintain network sanity.
Your proposal to "stop forwarding along routes" from which a backpressure message has been received would either require backbone routers to be magically connection-aware without a source identity (ATM could do so, but IP core routers mostly are not up to this task, and ATM is AFAIK still well behind IP in scaling and not getting much investment), or some sort of mechanism by which routers closer to the victim stop blocking traffic sooner than ones closer to the attacker, which would require additional state, and would be pretty slow to converge and probably subject to relapses. Not impossible, but a whole lot of technical trouble just to forgo using a source address.
In fact some ISPs do offer BGP "communities" to help stop DoS and DDoS attacks before they soak your inbound pipe. Usually stopping it at your own ISP's border is sufficient considering how much fatter their peering pipes are than yours.
As a term of art "privacy" was getting to be too much of a polyseme, so it was downgraded to a "reason for rather than a kind of security" in RFC4949.
"Anonymity" as a term of art does not exclude an unmasking ability... the loosest form of the word may be used to describe a system that only protects association of an alias with an identity by uninvolved third parties (termed "identity protection" in some protocols), and the involved third parties are allowed to include, for example, a court that may ask for an unmasking. Just saying "anonymous" is rarely going to be specific enough... an actual explanation of the parameters is needed.
So for example, if you communicate with a website "anonymously" but the website can tell you are the same person that communicated with them yesterday, that is technically "anonymous." You cannot have any meaningful form of authentication if you are using a definition of "anonymous" that prevents communicating parties from knowing they are talking to who they intend to be talking to. About all you can do in that case is provide completely public services.
"Accountability" is an essential component of a lot of services we take for granted, especially "non-repudiation" which is essential for securing business and legal transactions. Accountability involves agreeing to some rules of behavior, which are specific to the service in question.
TFA is pretty meaningless to throw such terms out there without defining the terms and parameters, and shouting about what they mean is meaningless as a result.
Make your own wires and leave all the spies and rent seekers and thought police behind.
...and when you try to control the flood of criminal sploit traffic making those wires useless, you become the spy....and when you cannot afford to keep that wire working, you become the rent seeker....and when you decide you don't want your pipe used for something you find morally unconscionable, you become the thought police.
All I can say is, if the idea of a "new Internet" gets tried yet fucking again, there are plenty of technologies already available to implement it. Some of them are really well designed. Ignore them, because whoever implements it will select the worst of the bunch and/or roll their own amateur crap.
You are giving them way too much credit. What's happening is simply that the comprehension of the stupidity of nearly the entire user base is finally dawning on them.
Said stupidity being the installation of an application that by its very nature has unfettered access to everything and constantly communicates with central control servers because you are scared about accidentally installing a program that gains unfettered access to everything and constantly communicates with control servers.
Said stupidity compounded by then failing to wondering what exactly prevents the producer of that software from acting against your interest -- the result of becoming so reliant on technology that we are in denial and recoil in horror at the depth of the rabbit hole one encounters when one questions who exactly they have trusted to provide them with technology.
There may be a few that are aware that bad-mouthing Kaspersky does help ameliorate the damage to tech exports that the intelligence community did by effectively back-dooring made-in-America product, but most of them are just like "wow we are placing a lot of trust in these AV products aren't we... oh wait, one of them is from a company operating subject to the authority of an adversarial cleptocracy? Oh crap."
Wouldn't we all, but we can't, due to the nature of the material.
Which makes it the perfect political cudgel, since hands may be waved and pearls clutched about what might be completely justified activity, and the only recourse is a review by a FISAish court, which will take time, and in the meantime those pearls get clutched harder and harder and the water gets muddier and muddier.
Next we'll be hearing that HC entrapped Trump into laundering Russian Mafia money all throughout the past few decades.
Well one perspective on this might be: if the app takes noticeable time to load on modern hardware to some sort of useful starting point, it's either too bloated or is running on a VM/platform that is too bloated, or it is poorly modularized.
I imagine eventually these will be clones of your own stem cells. Also ISTR studies saying stem cells can migrate from the blood stream to brain, so maybe it would evolve into an injection into an artery feeding the brain.
Assuming it works at all, and it isn't some X-files plot to turn us into alien chimeras.
This isn't just life extension it is quality of life extension. And yes it is a great idea. Might even reduce costs by increasing the odds that people will get hit by a truck before they need expensive care.
It's not a problem if you prefer to subject yourself to vi. Have at it. The problem is its use as a default editor. Personally I'm an emacs user, but I wouldn't advocate zile as a default editor either. pico/nano should be used for this, with on-screen help turned on.
May work in vim. Doesn't work on the vi insanely installed as the only editor on some embedded devices.
I rarely need to "join several lines" and when I do, usually I need to add a space or other delimiter. Query-replace on newline works great and so do keyboard macros.
But... unless we use paint, how are we supposed to turn screenshots into really poorly compressed BMPs and fill up our coworkers' exchange inbox quotas?
It's not like, with apple devices, using an uncongested 5GHz band will help, unless you know enough to tune down your 2.4G radios so the 5GHz signal is always at least 3dB stronger, and play with the beacon interval to make 5GHz statistically more likely to be seen. And, make sure you aren't still joined to the AP by the door you came in from, because Apple wifi drivers won't let go of it despite being right next to another AP.
I can't wait to see what new hell iOS11 brings to our enterprise setup.
There are optimal speeds at which to turn for each wind speed... has nothing to do with grid synchronization, which is achieved through various means depending on the model/manufacturer, e.g. a doubly fed generator. When they have to slow them down without using the grid load as a brake, for emergencies, they turn them at an angle to the wind. That's called furling.
At deep sea most bird flight paths are in migratory flocks. These are predictable and can be used to determine the least impact sites at which to install wind farms.
Using radar data, the turbines can also be slowed when a flock approaches, reducing wake vortices (which can explode bird lungs) and making the blades more avoidable during the day. At night, many species fly much higher than turbines.
Studies have also shown that some species adjust their migratory flight paths to avoid wind farms.
Now, whether wind companies act responsibly is something that needs an eye kept on it. However, due to the propensity of crazy people to tilt at wind projects, the expansion so far seems to have been extra careful. Ironically, fossil fuel industry astroturf campaigns to obstruct wind farm growth have served an environmental purpose... though whether that balances the damage caused by the delay they have managed to accrue is highly doubtful.
You are confusing "unemployed" with "non-employed"
It is always hard to admit you have been using a word wrong your entire life, but it is generally more fruitful to do so than to go about trying to change the meaning of that word. It happens to most of us.
Because the "un" in "unemployed" can be connoted by some to imply job loss, the word has often been considered derogatory, and so has not been used to refer to non-employed individuals in general. Especially homemakers, unless you want your toast burned and bits of shell in your eggs.
Slashdot Mirror
Meant to add before my itchy submit finger, some of those do require a sender identity. If you have a DoS stream incoming that is not DDoS, (or a DDoS using your network as a reflector), you need to have an identifiable source to tell the ISP to blackhole. Lacking this ability, anyone with a fatter pipe than yours can prevent other people on the network from reaching your service. This is one example where a network identity is required to maintain network sanity.
Your proposal to "stop forwarding along routes" from which a backpressure message has been received would either require backbone routers to be magically connection-aware without a source identity (ATM could do so, but IP core routers mostly are not up to this task, and ATM is AFAIK still well behind IP in scaling and not getting much investment), or some sort of mechanism by which routers closer to the victim stop blocking traffic sooner than ones closer to the attacker, which would require additional state, and would be pretty slow to converge and probably subject to relapses. Not impossible, but a whole lot of technical trouble just to forgo using a source address.
In fact some ISPs do offer BGP "communities" to help stop DoS and DDoS attacks before they soak your inbound pipe. Usually stopping it at your own ISP's border is sufficient considering how much fatter their peering pipes are than yours.
As a term of art "privacy" was getting to be too much of a polyseme, so it was downgraded to a "reason for rather than a kind of security" in RFC4949.
"Anonymity" as a term of art does not exclude an unmasking ability... the loosest form of the word may be used to describe a system that only protects association of an alias with an identity by uninvolved third parties (termed "identity protection" in some protocols), and the involved third parties are allowed to include, for example, a court that may ask for an unmasking. Just saying "anonymous" is rarely going to be specific enough... an actual explanation of the parameters is needed.
So for example, if you communicate with a website "anonymously" but the website can tell you are the same person that communicated with them yesterday, that is technically "anonymous." You cannot have any meaningful form of authentication if you are using a definition of "anonymous" that prevents communicating parties from knowing they are talking to who they intend to be talking to. About all you can do in that case is provide completely public services.
"Accountability" is an essential component of a lot of services we take for granted, especially "non-repudiation" which is essential for securing business and legal transactions. Accountability involves agreeing to some rules of behavior, which are specific to the service in question.
TFA is pretty meaningless to throw such terms out there without defining the terms and parameters, and shouting about what they mean is meaningless as a result.
Make your own wires and leave all the spies and rent seekers and thought police behind.
...and when you try to control the flood of criminal sploit traffic making those wires useless, you become the spy. ...and when you cannot afford to keep that wire working, you become the rent seeker. ...and when you decide you don't want your pipe used for something you find morally unconscionable, you become the thought police.
All I can say is, if the idea of a "new Internet" gets tried yet fucking again, there are plenty of technologies already available to implement it. Some of them are really well designed. Ignore them, because whoever implements it will select the worst of the bunch and/or roll their own amateur crap.
You are giving them way too much credit. What's happening is simply that the comprehension of the stupidity of nearly the entire user base is finally dawning on them.
Said stupidity being the installation of an application that by its very nature has unfettered access to everything and constantly communicates with central control servers because you are scared about accidentally installing a program that gains unfettered access to everything and constantly communicates with control servers.
Said stupidity compounded by then failing to wondering what exactly prevents the producer of that software from acting against your interest -- the result of becoming so reliant on technology that we are in denial and recoil in horror at the depth of the rabbit hole one encounters when one questions who exactly they have trusted to provide them with technology.
There may be a few that are aware that bad-mouthing Kaspersky does help ameliorate the damage to tech exports that the intelligence community did by effectively back-dooring made-in-America product, but most of them are just like "wow we are placing a lot of trust in these AV products aren't we... oh wait, one of them is from a company operating subject to the authority of an adversarial cleptocracy? Oh crap."
made prank pizza delivery to some LOSER FAKE NEWS magazine years ago
now LOSER 911 hangs up on me when hotel on fire. SAD! THEY ARE SO SUED. LOSERS.
I would like to know a little more.
Wouldn't we all, but we can't, due to the nature of the material.
Which makes it the perfect political cudgel, since hands may be waved and pearls clutched about what might be completely justified activity, and the only recourse is a review by a FISAish court, which will take time, and in the meantime those pearls get clutched harder and harder and the water gets muddier and muddier.
Next we'll be hearing that HC entrapped Trump into laundering Russian Mafia money all throughout the past few decades.
Well one perspective on this might be: if the app takes noticeable time to load on modern hardware to some sort of useful starting point, it's either too bloated or is running on a VM/platform that is too bloated, or it is poorly modularized.
I imagine eventually these will be clones of your own stem cells. Also ISTR studies saying stem cells can migrate from the blood stream to brain, so maybe it would evolve into an injection into an artery feeding the brain.
Assuming it works at all, and it isn't some X-files plot to turn us into alien chimeras.
This isn't just life extension it is quality of life extension. And yes it is a great idea. Might even reduce costs by increasing the odds that people will get hit by a truck before they need expensive care.
It is. But it just means we have to make up the quota with more orgasms.
Heheh. I know who YOU are. Congratulations on stalking me into a completely apolitical thread.
It's not a problem if you prefer to subject yourself to vi. Have at it. The problem is its use
as a default editor. Personally I'm an emacs user, but I wouldn't advocate zile
as a default editor either. pico/nano should be used for this, with on-screen help turned on.
May work in vim. Doesn't work on the vi insanely installed as the only editor on some
embedded devices.
I rarely need to "join several lines" and when I do, usually I need to add a space or other
delimiter. Query-replace on newline works great and so do keyboard macros.
But... unless we use paint, how are we supposed to turn screenshots into really poorly compressed BMPs and fill up our coworkers' exchange inbox quotas?
It's not like, with apple devices, using an uncongested 5GHz band will help, unless you know enough to tune down your 2.4G radios so the 5GHz signal is always at least 3dB stronger, and play with the beacon interval to make 5GHz statistically more likely to be seen. And, make sure you aren't still joined to the AP by the door you came in from, because Apple wifi drivers won't let go of it despite being right next to another AP.
I can't wait to see what new hell iOS11 brings to our enterprise setup.
I would propose backspace at the beginning of the line while in insert mode.
Like every normal editor ever.
There are optimal speeds at which to turn for each wind speed... has nothing to do with grid synchronization, which is achieved through various means depending on the model/manufacturer, e.g. a doubly fed generator. When they have to slow them down without using the grid load as a brake, for emergencies, they turn them at an angle to the wind. That's called furling.
Memorizing that isn't the problem with that one. Using it is. It's an anachronism in this day an age.
Many retired people take part time, or even full time, jobs
...and are then considered employed. They have "re-entered the work force".
Not wanting to work does not make one "unavailable"
Yes it does, unless your society permits slavery.
Homemakers are unemployed, unless they are paid to do the work.
Like I said... tell that to a homemaker ad see what happens.
the official definition comes from popular usage, not economists or any other academic authorities.
Most people do not consider all non-employed people to be "unemployed". You are in the minority on this. Face it.
At deep sea most bird flight paths are in migratory flocks. These are predictable and can be used to determine the least impact sites at which to install wind farms.
Using radar data, the turbines can also be slowed when a flock approaches, reducing wake vortices (which can explode bird lungs) and making the blades more avoidable during the day. At night, many species fly much higher than turbines.
Studies have also shown that some species adjust their migratory flight paths to avoid wind farms.
Now, whether wind companies act responsibly is something that needs an eye kept on it. However, due to the propensity of crazy people to tilt at wind projects, the expansion so far seems to have been extra careful. Ironically, fossil fuel industry astroturf campaigns to obstruct wind farm growth have served an environmental purpose... though whether that balances the damage caused by the delay they have managed to accrue is highly doubtful.
net immigration was down in 2016.
https://www.migrationwatchuk.o...
And down YoY in the first quarter.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplep...
So I guess either the population estimate or those stats have to be wrong (or there are lots of babies.)
You are confusing "unemployed" with "non-employed"
It is always hard to admit you have been using a word wrong your entire life, but it is generally more fruitful to do so than to go about trying to change the meaning of that word. It happens to most of us.
Because the "un" in "unemployed" can be connoted by some to imply job loss, the word has often been considered derogatory, and so has not been used to refer to non-employed individuals in general. Especially homemakers, unless you want your toast burned and bits of shell in your eggs.