Ok, if you admit someone using race as a criteria for any reason, you still have to reject someone based on race as well. In my mind that is not a justifiable action under any circumstance.
"the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races."
I think racism is making an assumption or decision based on race. You need to understand the fact that if you hold a racial preference, it means you also must hold a racial deference. Unless of course the resource being sought is infinite, which access to education certainly is not.
I am not making an assumption. It is a self evident truth that if you admit someone to a college because of their race who is underqualifed, you have to deny someone admission because of their race.
I'm not and I never have been a member of the GOP. I am a liberal, through and through. Justice Sotomayor is not a liberal, you are not a liberal. Justice Sotomayor sees every social issue through the lens of race. There is no problem that cannot be solved by looking at a racial solution. After all she is the "Wise Latina", that was elevated to the supreme court. If she had just been a Wise Korean she never would have made it. You should really give up the asterisks. They don't make your arguments any stronger.
No, it's not. That opinion is just rampant among people who view themselves as intellectually superior. And they use it to delegitimize the rest of the county, declare the debate as over, and ram their "solution" through, over the protests of the people it's supposed to help.
And history dictates that the left and the media, will just let him do it. We need a republican in office for anyone to actually blame the person in charge.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm self-employed and got completely fucked over like you did. 255% increase with a reduction in benefits, in my case.
It's actually just as destructive now as it was last year, if not more so. So if you actually care about the country it would still be a bugaboo.
Keep ignoring that rooster, and when she runs, it will doom her.
Racism arising from good intentions is still racism. Its not usually a white person that suffers, it usually an Asian.
That doesn't mean it's not stupid , annoying , and inconvenient .
Then you too have seen this shape.
Ok, if you admit someone using race as a criteria for any reason, you still have to reject someone based on race as well. In my mind that is not a justifiable action under any circumstance.
"the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races."
I think racism is making an assumption or decision based on race. You need to understand the fact that if you hold a racial preference, it means you also must hold a racial deference. Unless of course the resource being sought is infinite, which access to education certainly is not.
I am not making an assumption. It is a self evident truth that if you admit someone to a college because of their race who is underqualifed, you have to deny someone admission because of their race.
My point is that the entire organic food movement is not based in science.
Shouldn't be allowed by whom?
I'm not and I never have been a member of the GOP. I am a liberal, through and through. Justice Sotomayor is not a liberal, you are not a liberal. Justice Sotomayor sees every social issue through the lens of race. There is no problem that cannot be solved by looking at a racial solution. After all she is the "Wise Latina", that was elevated to the supreme court. If she had just been a Wise Korean she never would have made it. You should really give up the asterisks. They don't make your arguments any stronger.
The best way to end the social injustices of racism, is to end the social injustices of racism.
And yet, it's the Justice from the Bronx that writes the blatantly racist dissent.
...seems to think it's ok to reject an Asian American applicant to make room for an African or Hispanic American. That is despicable.
They don't want to be educated. But that doesn't really matter to you, does it?
As opposed to food that is fertilized with a substance that does not come from the excretory organs of an animal.
What if it kills 2 fewer than the 160 million it saves. Would you consider that pretty safe?
I distrust the people who tell me the science is settled, and that corporations are always to blame.
No, it's not. That opinion is just rampant among people who view themselves as intellectually superior. And they use it to delegitimize the rest of the county, declare the debate as over, and ram their "solution" through, over the protests of the people it's supposed to help.
You eat organic food, don't you?
Put yourself in the shoes of the AP. All of those sciencey things are the same, because they're science. Anything more than 0% dissent is too much.
You stupid idiot. He could stop all of this with a phone call.
No, I'm pretty sure my mom hasn't been laid since about 1987. That's when my dad died.
And history dictates that the left and the media, will just let him do it. We need a republican in office for anyone to actually blame the person in charge.