So you're actually taking the side of an HOA over the guy who came up with a very creative solution to a stupid policy? You should vote for Hillary, she's exactly your type of authoritarian candidate. I want the hearse guy as my neighbor.
I would say limiting H1B visas is a pretty intelligent solution to the problem of too many H1B visas and of them being used to replace American workers. What's Hillary's plan?
And while I might thing its crazy we let people inherit enough wealth that what they're buying is "skyscrapers to put their name on", that part seems reasonable
Yeah, we should be more like Sweden which abolished inheritance and gift taxes in 2004.
That's when Trump will say "Oh, why doesn't being President pay properly? From now on, I get $500M per year, and I get to keep all this cool stuff. And also I don't want any more of those stupid elections, let's get rid of those. Also, why are non-Trump businesses allowed? I should own all American businesses, in fact, change the name of the country to Trump America.".
Like a typical leftist, you obviously haven't read nor do you have any understanding of the Constitution. Congress sets the compensation for the President.
That's interesting. When did Mexican become a race? Or have you idiots completely subverted the meaning of the words of the English language to benefit your political views?
Wait, which country do we have relations with that haven't been wrecked under Obama? The only one I can think of with improved relations is Iran, because the Ayatollah likes getting his dick sucked by a US president.
Are you saying that if we make it less expensive and complicated to do business in the United States, more people will do business in the United States? That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. You just want to favor the 1%. Vote Democrat!
Well hell, I't not like he deliberately installed a server to store the pictures and distribute them to other people. And that wrist slap was infinitely harder than the nothing that Hillary got
Because it is. An indictment requires criminal intent. None was found regarding Hillary's email server.
Unless of course, the law states that gross negligence is grounds for prosecution. Negligence does not require intent. But of couse, it's a simple fact that she intended to install a personal unsecured server, that she intended run State business through that server, that she intended to store said emails on said server, that said emails were going to contain classified information, and that numerous people without security clearance were going to have access to that server. That's all the intent you need.
At least the game is winnable.
Waaaahhh! Does that have gluten in it?
The tech sector is much less isolated than it was 15 years ago. It will be much broader than the tech sector.
We have the Affordable Care Act now. Illnesses wont hurt you financially any more.
And then leak your story and details of your severance package to the media. If everyone did that, this problem would go away very quickly.
You mean like what happened with Libya, or our "reset" with Russia?
Good god, she's awful. Thanks for that wonderful nugget.
I don't do business with companies that make me talk to cheap foreign workers.
The Immigration Act of 1990 which created H1B visas was introduced by Ted Kennedy, you idiot.
No, it's not. Programming a robot is a far superior job to manual labor.
You can certainly destroy an economy with laws.
Medical bills are a factor in more than half of all personal bankruptcies.
No they aren't. We have the Affordable Care Act, which fixed that problem.
So you're actually taking the side of an HOA over the guy who came up with a very creative solution to a stupid policy? You should vote for Hillary, she's exactly your type of authoritarian candidate. I want the hearse guy as my neighbor.
I would say limiting H1B visas is a pretty intelligent solution to the problem of too many H1B visas and of them being used to replace American workers. What's Hillary's plan?
And while I might thing its crazy we let people inherit enough wealth that what they're buying is "skyscrapers to put their name on", that part seems reasonable
Yeah, we should be more like Sweden which abolished inheritance and gift taxes in 2004.
That's when Trump will say "Oh, why doesn't being President pay properly? From now on, I get $500M per year, and I get to keep all this cool stuff. And also I don't want any more of those stupid elections, let's get rid of those. Also, why are non-Trump businesses allowed? I should own all American businesses, in fact, change the name of the country to Trump America.".
Like a typical leftist, you obviously haven't read nor do you have any understanding of the Constitution. Congress sets the compensation for the President.
Because many people overstay their visa and become illegal immigrants.
Stop pointing out that the cubbyholed categories that everyone gets piled into by the left don't make any sense.
That's interesting. When did Mexican become a race? Or have you idiots completely subverted the meaning of the words of the English language to benefit your political views?
Wait, which country do we have relations with that haven't been wrecked under Obama? The only one I can think of with improved relations is Iran, because the Ayatollah likes getting his dick sucked by a US president.
You hang your head in shame now, but just wait until you cast your vote for Hillary. Then shame will know no bounds.
Are you saying that if we make it less expensive and complicated to do business in the United States, more people will do business in the United States? That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. You just want to favor the 1%. Vote Democrat!
Well hell, I't not like he deliberately installed a server to store the pictures and distribute them to other people. And that wrist slap was infinitely harder than the nothing that Hillary got
Try posting something relevant to the topic. Hillary says it's heartbreaking but offers no solution ------ I covered my ass.
Because it is. An indictment requires criminal intent. None was found regarding Hillary's email server.
Unless of course, the law states that gross negligence is grounds for prosecution. Negligence does not require intent. But of couse, it's a simple fact that she intended to install a personal unsecured server, that she intended run State business through that server, that she intended to store said emails on said server, that said emails were going to contain classified information, and that numerous people without security clearance were going to have access to that server. That's all the intent you need.