Slashdot Mirror


Pokemon Go Becomes Biggest Mobile Game In US History (techcrunch.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Pokemon Go is now the biggest mobile game of all time in the U.S. Not only has it surpassed Twitter's daily users, but it is seeing people spend more time in its app than in Facebook. An earlier report from SimilarWeb says Pokemon Go has surpassed Tinder in terms of installations -- the app surpassed Tinder on July 7th. Today, the tracking firm says Pokemon Go has managed to surpass Twitter in terms of daily active users on Monday. It says almost 6% of the entire U.S. Android population is engaging with the app on a daily basis. A new report from SurveyMonkey intelligence indicated that Pokemon Go has claimed the title "biggest mobile game in U.S. history." The game saw just under 21 million daily active users in the U.S. on Monday. It's reportedly closing in on Snapchat on Android, and could surpass Google Maps on Android as well. According to app store intelligence firm SensorTower, the average iPhone user on iOS spent 33 minutes catching Pokemon, which is more than any other apps it analyzed, including Facebook, Snapchat, Twitter, Instagram, and Slither.io. The app with the second-most average usage at 22 minutes, 8 seconds, was Facebook. SurveyMonkey did note that Pokemon Go still falls short of other games when it comes to time spent in games. Game of War sees nearly 2 hours of total daily usage for the average user, while Candy Crush Saga sees daily usage of about 43 minutes. In just two days, Pokemon Go brought Nintendo's market value to $7.5 billion. It's worth noting that it remains to be seen whether or not the game will continue to break records or turn into a ghost town like Nintendo's first mobile game, Miitomo.

174 comments

  1. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't seen Ariel Winter post about it on Instagram yet, so the game is nothing to me.

    1. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I missed the whole Pokemon thing due to being an adult when it first arrived. Having never played any of the games, I went to see what this was about on Google Play, until I saw this: "Offers in-app purchases", which translates to "crippleware" or "perpetual subscription".

    2. Re:Meh by smelch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not exactly. You can buy your way out of needing to visit the PokeStops to get more pokeballs and other items you need. You can either drop $10 or hang out in a coffee shop that's close to a pokestop for an hour. That's actually what I really enjoy about the temporary cultural fixation on it. It feels like the first truly social game, not play alone with strangers in the basement.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    3. Re:Meh by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As Sheldon put it, the beauty of having online friends is not having to meet them. Why would I want to meet these people only to remind me that I'm like them?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re: Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I like playing alone with strangers in my basement

      Going back to my MUD now. Finger me when this P-GO madness is over

    5. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > until I saw this: "Offers in-app purchases", which translates to

      Almost every mobile game on the market. If you don't like IAP, that's legit. But the game is great.

    6. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BS. I buy plenty of mobile games that are pay up front and never pay again.

    7. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is a PokeStop and how do the developers make money if one can unlock the full game by simply hanging out near one for an hour?

    8. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geocaching is a better game than Pokemon Go.

    9. Re:Meh by Falos · · Score: 1

      Anyone who knows the ecosystem knows it translates into "skip timers/grinds" or "pay to win".

      I'm not even saying those in a bitter tone, those are pretty much the well-known, widely understood foundations of freemium.

    10. Re:Meh by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      There's 21 million daily users...even a tiny percentage of them sometimes spending money adds up quickly.

    11. Re:Meh by dcollins117 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you are willing to pay not to play the game, then why are you playing the game? Honestly, I never understood that.

    12. Re:Meh by Falos · · Score: 1

      This is how I see cheats. But for a serious answer, if it only takes a dollar to permanently recalibrate a game's artificially-inflated grinds (they know exactly what they're fucking doing) back to par, you get tempted.

      That's a generous example, usually the game is more bullshit than that and it's best to walk away.

    13. Re: Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously. I free to play world of tanks. Because I like to play the tanks. Never understood paying for it. Makes it a better challenge anyway, games aren't really hard enough for "hardcore" (addicted ) gamers.

    14. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But for a serious answer, if it only takes a dollar to permanently recalibrate a game's artificially-inflated grinds (they know exactly what they're fucking doing) back to par, you get tempted.

      If it is a permanent recalibration, then it's less "freemium" and more "you tried the demo, now buy the game!". Pokemon Picross was that way. I don't know if Pokemon Go is.

    15. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What is a PokeStop and how do the developers make money if one can unlock the full game by simply hanging out near one for an hour?

      By a staggering coincidence, there is a PokeStop at my local bar. For $0.80 worth of virtual currency, the bartender can activate a "lure" - the lure draws pokemon to spawn at the bar, and the pokemon and the alcohol (or food - a patio restaurant with the patio within range of a Pokestop is SUPER EFFECTIVE) combined draw humon to ... well, they walk to the bar, and what they do after they're too drunk to catch Pokemon isn't really any of our business. As long as they pay while they're eating and drinking.

      To math it out in full: $0.80 for a lure, 30 minutes. So about $10 in costs for the restaurant if it wants to cover lunch/dinner. If it brings in just one more customer to shop there instead of their competitor half a block away - the restauranteur makes money. (The customer has spent $20 for an hour-long meal, during which they grab about 1000 XP worth of gaming per user, plus 12 5-minute-cooldown-regulated hits at the Pokestop, each typically yielding $0.30 worth of Pokeballs, postions, and other virtual goods.)

      Win-win situation. Customer who was going to eat a $20 meal gets $1 worth of virtual trinkets from Niantic. Proprietor pays $1.60 to attract as many customers as play the game. But even if it's just one person sitting at a table alone, that's $20 in revenue and even at a 50% markup on the food, about $10 in profit. Net win for Proprietor is at least $8.40.

    16. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you but I go to pubs to hang out with people and socialise, not to play video games.

    17. Re:Meh by 1080bogus · · Score: 1

      It feels like the first truly social game, not play alone with strangers in the basement.

      Have you heard of Ingress, Niantic's other social game? www.ingress.com

      Yes, I'm somewhat bitter about Pokemon Go and the players overtaking the areas I play for Ingress. The unfortunate, but obvious decision was to use the same location for portals in Ingress, for pokestops and gyms in Pokemon Go. Pokemon Go is less of a social game when compared to Ingress. Pokemon Go is also a game that will be ruined by cheaters and people who pay to play. Ingress has it's fair share of cheaters but you can't buy things to give yourself an incredible advantage. While I don't like that aspect of Pokemon Go and is part of the reason I dislike it, I know it'll only support Ingress and it's development as well. It's a double-edge sword. The game also has helped Ingress gain more players but, because the games are much different in how you play and level up it's unknown if any of them will stick around. Most probably will think it's way too hard in comparison to Pokemon Go despite our efforts to help them. There are many overlaying aspects between the two games that will ruin Ingress for some (same locations and cooldown periods). Most people can handle the initial surge of people in the areas but if this keeps up, Niantic may have just shot themselves in the foot with Ingress and some of it's players.

    18. Re: Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You meet more people playing Pokemon.

    19. Re:Meh by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

      The only things you actually have to buy (as in, can't get for free from a pokestop) is the bag and Pokemon storage upgrade, which alow you to have more items and pokemon at once. They're purely optional. There is literally no need to spend any money to have fun with this game. it sucks that so many other games have completely ruined our outlook on games that offer optional IAP.

    20. Re: Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You travel to more interesting places geocaching. You also get stuff.

    21. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time. Playing a lot vs. playing a little. I often pay for upgrades to avoid the grind time. I have more $ than Time because I am old...

    22. Re:Meh by Chalnoth · · Score: 1

      You don't have to actually meet people to play Pokemon Go. It can help for coordinating efforts on powerful gyms, but it's definitely not necessary.

    23. Re:Meh by Chalnoth · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that all revenue goes to gains, whereas only a relatively small portion is actually the operating margin. Then there's the fact that customers may lay down their own lures if the proprietor does nothing.

      I imagine there's probably still a net benefit, but it's not quite as clear as you claim here. The largest benefit would probably coming from geeky spots (e.g. gaming bars) having regular events (e.g. Wednesday night Pokemon).

    24. Re:Meh by Chalnoth · · Score: 1

      You might be surprised to learn that many video games are quite social.

  2. Gotta Catch Em All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STDs

    1. Re:Gotta Catch Em All by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      this can't be a real APK post, it's short

    2. Re:Gotta Catch Em All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this can't be a real APK post, it's short

      What you call "short", APK prefers to term "penile impaired". You insensitive clod!

    3. Re:Gotta Catch Em All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, so that's what APK stands for: Atrophied Penis King.

    4. Re:Gotta Catch Em All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hats off to the guy. The most famous anonymous coward in the world. Trolling pays.

  3. Novelty will wear off by Spy+Handler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    eventually and people will move on to other things.

    Anyone remember the Nintendo Wii craze when it first came out?

    1. Re:Novelty will wear off by aliquis · · Score: 4, Funny

      eventually and people will move on to other things.

      Anyone remember the Nintendo Wii craze when it first came out?

      Or sex with the wife / what Al Bundy would had said.

    2. Re:Novelty will wear off by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No, I honestly can't say I remember something like that.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Novelty will wear off by desdinova+216 · · Score: 5, Funny

      pepperidge farms remembers...

    4. Re:Novelty will wear off by tehlinux · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I'm sure people will eventually get bored of pokemon...

      --
      Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
    5. Re:Novelty will wear off by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Still play my Wii

      --
      Be seeing you...
    6. Re:Novelty will wear off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the craze that only really waned after they reached sufficient market saturation on the consoles that demand no longer outstripped supply. Yet they were still selling em quickly even though by the time you could find them in stores reliably (and without a huge markup) the console was three years old.

    7. Re:Novelty will wear off by Piata · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Wii craze that basically lasted 5 years and resulted in record number of sales and some absolute classic games? Yeah, I remember it. And I still play my Wii. I haven't played it but Pokemon GO is going to be many people's first dose of augmented reality and that's going to give it a lot of staying power.

  4. Americans getting exercise finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Isn't this a good thing?

    1. Re:Americans getting exercise finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I do a nightly walk in the local park with my dog. In the past week I have seen dozens of groups of hefty, pale people wondering around in the dark. If they keep at it for the next six months, they will drop some pounds like I have...

      I call this a good thing, although they seem to ignore park hours and have put a huge dent into the night time construction project that some mbx/skater/homeless kids have been working on for the past couple of months

    2. Re:Americans getting exercise finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. Victims get a workout, robbers get both a workout and free smartphones and belonging from victims at more remote/hidden spots.
      Pedophiles and rapists get additional hip action in more remote and hidden spots.
      And pedestrians get to experience flying from being hit by vehicles.
      Everyone wins! :D

    3. Re:Americans getting exercise finally by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      They said the same about the Kinect. It lasted ... what, 3 months?

      And this is even worse. What good is the "exercise" of going from one Pokestop to the next when they are shared between Starbucks, Dunkin' Donuts and Burger King?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Americans getting exercise finally by narcc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know this might sound crazy, but it is possible to walk past a coffee shop, bakery, and even a fast-food restaurant without stopping to stuff your face with a 1000 calorie snack.

      I swear, it's true.

    5. Re:Americans getting exercise finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AZ must be weird then, a lot of our pokestops here seem to be parks, sculptures, weird shit like that

    6. Re:Americans getting exercise finally by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Pokémon Go is the best social space for thugs since Craigslist.

    7. Re:Americans getting exercise finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Plus it has been about 110 lately, so they are all out in the parks at night... maybe there is a vampire angle on it

    8. Re:Americans getting exercise finally by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Judging from what I saw in the US I thought it's against the law or something.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Americans getting exercise finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation needed.

    10. Re:Americans getting exercise finally by Outta_the_way_peck! · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, there are nocturnal Pokemon that are only found at night. Of course, parks close at dusk around here, so the cops have been shooing people away. A local police department posted on Facebook a picture of a dozen people next to the sign saying the park closes at dusk after they were called there.

  5. Popular for the moment by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IMHO (which is biased) Pokemon has a limited lifespan, until people actually get bored doing the same old shit every day. There is almost nothing compelling about the game, and there is very little if any competition between the teams.

    So, while it may be exciting now, because it is shiny and new, once the luster tarnishes, what is there to hold the attention of Dory the Fish?

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Popular for the moment by smelch · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I do agree it will drop of dramatically in about 5 days. But, to improve longevity you continually release new features until you've turned it in to a AR version of the core games in the series. Trading comes first, new pokemon according to "season" comes next, revamped combat, etc. and you can keep a respectable community for the game. I mean, WoW has always been extremely repetitive but did and does very well. It's just not a cultural phenomenon.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    2. Re:Popular for the moment by subanark · · Score: 2

      Updates may keep it alive. If there is a reward for exploring new places, you can bet people will take out the game to see new stuff when they travel to new places. Currently though, the landmarks can be reused every 5 minutes. The game has a ton of "borrowed" content, it just has to capitalize on it.

    3. Re:Popular for the moment by Derekloffin · · Score: 2

      If it does remain static, it definitely will die a quick death. However, if they keep up with updates in both content and gameplay, then it may well have substantial legs.

    4. Re:Popular for the moment by darkain · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Pokemon has a limited lifespan" Pretty bold statement about a gaming franchise going as strong as ever 20 years later down the road from where it started. Not bad for a property that is older than the entirety of the XBox existing, and almost as old as the original PlayStation, just to put things into perspective. But yes, let's keep on claiming it has a "limited lifespan"

    5. Re:Popular for the moment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Of course it has limited lifespan, but: how limited? Did you miss the part about more people using it than Facebook? I thought Facebook's novelty would wear off after a few weeks, but people are still playing that too! Or at least they were, until a week ago...

      If Pokemon Go is the new Facebook whose bandwagon all our bosses want us to jump onto (our site doesn't have to have a like button anymore? Instead we have to tell people to look around for critters?) that's a refreshing change. Now where's my Pokemon SDK?

    6. Re:Popular for the moment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They might even make a movie about it...!

    7. Re:Popular for the moment by Harlequin80 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Add in PvP and it will get even bigger. Trading is coming which will be a huge incentive, but the ability to have pokemon battles against your friends will turn this into something more addictive than crack.

    8. Re:Popular for the moment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as they keep handing out the peanuts at the right rate, the pigeons will keep tapping the button.

    9. Re:Popular for the moment by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      While I'm not a big pokemon person, the series and games both came out when I was in high school/college so I missed the original 'craze', I decided to take a look by installing it on my tablet... Only to be told my tablet wasn't supported. So while I've seen pics and gone 'eh', I can't actually see for myself. I'm even less motivated to take a peek now.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    10. Re:Popular for the moment by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Btw what I find even funnier is Nintendo just send me an email ad stating 'Nintendo is the place to be for summer!' and not once did they even hint to the seeming popularity of Pokemon Go... Or even recognize it's existence. It reminds me how disconnected they really seem from their 'fans'.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    11. Re:Popular for the moment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone has an inner pokimon that is worth seeking out too.

    12. Re:Popular for the moment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get it do you???

      pGo is the next captured audience advertising program.
      Want foot traffic in your stores, pay Ndo to stuff a pmon in there.
      Want discounts on shit, go turn in pmons.
      It's fucking brilliant marketing.
      Just you wait.

    13. Re:Popular for the moment by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Updates may keep it alive. If there is a reward for exploring new places, you can bet people will take out the game to see new stuff when they travel to new places. Currently though, the landmarks can be reused every 5 minutes. The game has a ton of "borrowed" content, it just has to capitalize on it.

      So what about their previous game, Ingress? That seems to still be going strong.

      So yes, content updates are key, but there's so much content available AND all the experience in Ingress that could be applied to Pokemon Go that could keep it going for a few years still.

      The key is to release new content just when people start to get bored - too early and slower players may feel overwhelmed that new stuff is coming too fast, too slow and faster players get bored and you can potentially lose them.

      The Pokemon Company I'm sure did their research into Niantic and Ingress to see if they could make a lasting Pokemon mobile game.

      The real question is what happens in a year's time - for mobile stuff, a year seems to be whether it will last or fizzle out (see Angry Birds - it was wildly popular when it came out and then faded away).

    14. Re:Popular for the moment by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      PvP will be introduced very cautiously. There's a super-child-friendly brand to protect, and a mixed-age audience. When 14-year-old player goes out to battle and meets up with 42-year-old player, even with purely innocent intent, the creep-factor will be off the charts.

    15. Re:Popular for the moment by Harlequin80 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not really sure how this is different to trading? I doubt you would be able to ever stand there with a beacon on saying battle me, or trade with me. I had assumed that trading would be restricted to people who knew that each other were playing and the same with PvP. Of course that allows organisations outside of Pokemon Go to organise battles but again no different to trading.

    16. Re:Popular for the moment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMHO (which is biased) Pokemon has a limited lifespan

      I see it's your first day, here on the internet. Please take an in-joke and enjoy the rest of your stay.

    17. Re:Popular for the moment by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

      I've played Ingress since early beta phase, and have seen many people leave, and then many more come. For instance, in beta there were only 8 player levels. People got to 8, realized there was no real endgame beyond that, and left. And then Niantic added levels up to 16, added missions, First Saturdays, events, lots of new game concepts, and so on, and years later it's still really active. In the earlier days Niantic was really underfunded and was slow to market for new features.

      --
      Reply to That ||
    18. Re:Popular for the moment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a couple months they'll add peer to peer battling/trading and a bunch on new pokemon.

      Whichever of battling/tadring doesn't get done then will be in the next release a few months later with yet more new pokemon.

      Then yet more month later they'll add a way to tutur you pokemon with specific moves and more new pokemon

      You see where this is going?

    19. Re:Popular for the moment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      an angry birds movie just came out and its pretty common to see angry birds merchandise when passing the kids section? it's still a thing.

      similarly, of course pokego won't be a huge focus of attention forever, or much longer, but its fanbase is people who have been playing the same game for 15 fucking years. if ingress can remain popular in its own right with its own niche of people, pokego will always be multiple times more so and be A Thing for years to come. it's good exercise and i like pokemon, so i don't really see stopping playing completely anytime soon, if ever.

  6. And Google (Niantic) is just loving the data... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they are pulling from tracking millions of GPS-tagged sheep.

    1. Re:And Google (Niantic) is just loving the data... by kheldan · · Score: 1

      No kidding. They sure this isn't subsidized by the NSA or some other intelligence agency, to trick people into voluntarily having their whereabouts tracked via GPS everywhere they go? Fools.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    2. Re:And Google (Niantic) is just loving the data... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're walking around with a phone on you, you're already voluntarily handing out your whereabouts in real time. Google tracks that, and you can bet the NSA does too. Apple might, not sure either way.

      Yes... even if you have disabled the phone's GPS.

    3. Re:And Google (Niantic) is just loving the data... by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > NSA or some other intelligence agency, to trick people

      "Sir, we've found that there's clusters of pokemon players at the dratini spawns. What could this mean?"
      "We're aware soldier. Word from the top is that they'll have fully evolved dragonites within a week."

    4. Re:And Google (Niantic) is just loving the data... by bernywork · · Score: 1

      What is that you think they're going to gleam from that data given that they had the ingress data for the past three years?

      --
      Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
    5. Re:And Google (Niantic) is just loving the data... by kheldan · · Score: 1

      You can't track something that's powered off. Surprise! I don't have a smartphone, I have a flip phone, it doesn't even have GPS, and if I'm feeling particularly paranoid, I can remove the battery, too. Don't need to really, when it's 'off' it's all the way off, and it can't be turned on remotely. No plans to get a smartphone either. I'll take the cheapest dumbphone I can get when I have to replace it, and like this one it'll be off when I'm not using it. Nothing to track!

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    6. Re:And Google (Niantic) is just loving the data... by Z80a · · Score: 1

      I don't see much use for this data, because people are being actually guided by the application, rather than acting on their own.
      You have to remember that in the end of the day, what google wants with the data is to sell it to the companies as statistics and bullshit like "yes, getting a red logo made more people pay attention to your product".
      Of course, a more likely scenario would be to place a pokemon close to a product you want to sell, but its arguable if the person will even see the product.

    7. Re:And Google (Niantic) is just loving the data... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use a smartphone and disable wifi, GPS, bluetooth, "data" traffic, all permanently or use wifi only on a few home networks like you'd do with a laptop. Better yet, control that wifi network so your phone's web goes through a filtering proxy. Best still, don't even put a SIM card into that smartphone.
      So it'd be disingenuous to pretend that a smartphone tracks you more, if you disable all or almost all networking. More disingenious to pretend that you're fucked anyway, so cave in and create a microsoft account, a google account etc.

      But a pure GSM dumb phone with no internet and a read-only firmware, or a smartphone with a SIM card (or activated, whatever) gets you tracked when you show up on the GSM network (or whatever CDMA thing) , to a particular building or block or park.
      I would expect only law enforcement to access that data, but who knows what the hell is done.

    8. Re:And Google (Niantic) is just loving the data... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't your tin foil hat interfere with your phone reception though?

    9. Re:And Google (Niantic) is just loving the data... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't all that solid stone in your head make it hard for you to think? Silly me, you don't have cognition, you're just an amoeba with arms and legs!

  7. Not just Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36786671

    Rumor has it pokemon will be part of the new UK cabinet.

    1. Re:Not just Americans by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Compared to Cameron this can only be an improvement. Then again, the average water cooler would be.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. people spend more time in its app than in Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since when is that a bad thing?

    i'm all for anything that pulls people away from facebook, even if it means every so often one wanders off a cliff looking for a pokemon.

  9. This app is begging for wearable tech by mark-t · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if it could have been the killer app for google glass... if people hadn't been so freaked out about privacy that they would assault anyone wearing one.

    1. Re:This app is begging for wearable tech by Harlequin80 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Google glass failed because it was rubbish. Horrible interface, slow and a really crap screen. Not to mention ugly and weird looking.

      Privacy was a concern but I feel like that was more of a US centric concern than a general world wide one.

    2. Re:This app is begging for wearable tech by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      So, your solution to people hating Google Glass because it could have its camera on all the time, is to write an app that requires its camera to be on all the time?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:This app is begging for wearable tech by mark-t · · Score: 1

      How many people do you see assaulting people using pokemon go? That's got its camera on all the time too.... it's just as likely to record people, but nobody calls pokemon go players derisive comments like glassholes for google glass users.

    4. Re:This app is begging for wearable tech by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Oh, and to answer your question... yes. Because if it such usage became pervasive as pokemon go seems to have, people would be more likely to think people using it are just using an augmented reality application more than they were interested in invading other people's privacy.

    5. Re:This app is begging for wearable tech by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      Well, Pokemon Go is a game that you can tell doesn't feed information back to a company famous for invading privacy and building giant databases on people. I mean, it's camera data remains locally there (known) and not based on what app they are running. So, not as likely to record people.

      Secondly, holding a phone in your hand is a conscious action. Most people aren't worried about obvious, human limited recording. It's the passive, pervasive police state glassholes wanted to subject us to that people object to.

      I'm assuming it's obvious, but I hated Google Glass, and am happy it died in a fire.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    6. Re:This app is begging for wearable tech by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I presume then that you would be against any kind of general purpose computing platform as wearable tech that could provide an immersive augmented reality system, because it also contains a camera (which is necessary to provide an augmented reality that seamlessly blends with the physical surroundings) that could also conceivably be used to record people's activities, and would not require any sort of "conscious action" like holding something in your hand to utilize. Consider that the fact that it wouldn't require any kind of explicit and outwardly obvious action like being held in your hand is actually the entire point of wearable tech.

      Which would suggest to me that you are probably just opposed to the idea of wearable tech in general.

    7. Re:This app is begging for wearable tech by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Yes, I tend to oppose any "general purpose computing platform as wearable tech that could provide an immersive augmented reality system". I'd be fine with such wearables if there were safeguards that prevented the camera images from being uploaded to a server, say by having the AR done at the OS level.

      I don't want license plate trackers, for faces, following me around - that seems logical.

      Make your wearable a watch! Make it a cameraless screen in front of your eyes. Those don't impose a cost on my privacy.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    8. Re:This app is begging for wearable tech by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume that you would matter enough to anyone for them to want to track you or follow you around in the first place? What about wetware, were absolutely everything that somebody else *sees* could potentially be uploaded to a server somewhere... and not necessarily even at the time that they saw it.

    9. Re:This app is begging for wearable tech by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yeah because people continuously fed videos and pictures at a constant rate to the mothership on their limited data plans.

      Personally I don't see the problem with Google Glass. I do however instantly form an opinion of people who use the word Glasshole about a person they've never met and don't know.

    10. Re:This app is begging for wearable tech by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Do I think that there are people tracking me? No. Do I think that computer systems are tracking me on par with everyone else. Yes. Do I therefore oppose increasing their power? Yes.

      I mean, do you not think that license plate tracking cameras are recording your car's movements along with all others?

      Wetware is totally different. There's a fundamental difference in scale, completeness, and data-minability of automated metrics. Human beings have finiite time, and I doubt they want to spend time on me.

      It's similar to why I think a GPS locator attached to your car requires a warrant, but a stakeout might not. Lowering the cost of doing something, down to electricity on a server (since hardware costs are borne by users) changes how we feel about it.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    11. Re:This app is begging for wearable tech by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Absent that constant feed, half or more of the AR features don't work. I mean, if you want it to pop up info on who you are talking to, you need to send a picture of their face. Or if you want to find out about cheaper online deals, you need to send the barcode. IN both cases, you can do a lot of preprocessing on teh device.

      In fairness, I don't think I ever met a murderer, but I still form an opinion about them. Judging someone based on their actions, esp. when that judgement is condemning them for a specific action (e.g. being a Glasshole is only the case while wearing a Google Glass device)

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  10. Re:people spend more time in its app than in Faceb by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You say people wandering off cliffs 'cause they're too stupid to survive as if that was a bad thing.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  11. Nintendo continues to lead while others follow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's worth noting that it remains to be seen whether or not the game will continue to break records or turn into a ghost town like Nintendo's first mobile game, Miitomo."

    Irrelevant. The fact Nintendo reinvents the wheel every decade is why they will always find a place in the household.

    1. Re:Nintendo continues to lead while others follow by cfalcon · · Score: 2

      Comparing it to Miitomo is a fucking joke. That was some interactive social experiment crap. This is goddamned pokemon.

      If Nintendo wanted to make apps, they would need to use one of their actual franchises. That doesn't mean they have to make Mobile Mario (though they could!), or ANY *existing* franchise (though they should!). But it does mean that they need fantasy characters in a fantasy world, not more stupid Mii bullshit.

    2. Re:Nintendo continues to lead while others follow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't own a smartphone yet, but this game makes me want to buy one if money permitted.

  12. quantas vezes tenho que chutar a filha desse merda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Se tu gosta de fumar crack então casa logo com o Bruno, sua puta CARIOCA.

  13. Re:POKEMON DEFLECT READERS FROM COMMENTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod this down -1 quick, for more attention dickheads.

  14. Re:POKEMON DEFLECT READERS FROM COMMENTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alex Jones is CIA too

    lets plaaaaaaaaaaay infowarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrs

  15. Re:people spend more time in its app than in Faceb by narcc · · Score: 2

    Believe it or not, most people have emotional responses like "compassion" and "empathy".

    Before you respond with some pro-eugenics screed, consider that people who lack the above traits would be among those on the chopping block...

  16. Re:POKEMON DEFLECT READERS FROM COMMENTS by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    > Nobody on /. cares about Pokemon.

    Oh get real, this game is huge.

  17. Re:people spend more time in its app than in Faceb by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    since when is that a bad thing?

    i'm all for anything that pulls people away from facebook, even if it means every so often one wanders off a cliff looking for a pokemon.

    Arizona reporting in: just lost another one...
    http://money.cnn.com/2016/07/1...

  18. Re:people spend more time in its app than in Faceb by war4peace · · Score: 1

    Oh, i pity them, all right. Just not regret them.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  19. What if ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Funny
    What if you can catch angry birds in Pokemon Go?

    And then slice virtual fruits using virtual knives to feed the angry birds?

    What if the angry birds eating sliced fruits become candy that you must crush?

    Inquiring minds want to know...

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:What if ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Inquiring minds want to know...
      Entrepreneurial minds want to know...
      FTFY :D

  20. Microsoft by Mandrel · · Score: 1

    They said the same about the Kinect. It lasted ... what, 3 months?

    What interests me is how Microsoft seems to have again missed the boat after being a pioneer in augmented reality with their HoloLens. A replay of earlier failures to press home their market-leader status in pocket and larger touch-screen devices, in gestural interfaces, and in web browsers.

    They seem to have a fixation on big lost battles like search and their own phone ecosystem, rather than exploiting and continuing to perfect their innovations. They develop exciting things, but move on while they're still primitive.

    1. Re:Microsoft by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Large corporations are usually not very innovative. For good reason. They have SUCH a baggage of bureaucracy to haul about that the risk becomes unacceptable. Don't forget, that programmer that produces something has to carry a load of lawyers, finance guys, managers and a lot of other dead weight, so whatever he produces MUST be profitable. Innovation, that's something you can do at a startup.

      You might have noticed that even Google, which was pretty much the company with perpetuals "betas" that tossed more or less complete toys and gadgets about only to stomp them out a year later, stopped doing this when they made the transition from start-up to established and entrenched. There simply is no room anymore for experiments.

      Corporations like this are far better off leaving the innovation stuff to smaller companies and then either buy them out or snuff them out with the power of the allmighty $.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Microsoft by Mandrel · · Score: 1

      Large corporations are usually not very innovative.

      Often true. But Apple seems to be an exception. This may be one legacy of Steve Jobs. A willingness to take time to perfect things, to relentlessly improve their offerings without getting distracted trying to clone the current-big-thing, to bet the company on an opportunity, and to aggressively steer a large company faster than would be possible without a BDL as CEO.

      Perhaps the need for time and space to perfect their products is the origin of Apple's notorious secrecy.

    3. Re:Microsoft by hjf · · Score: 1

      Not really. I work for a large company in software development. Our product is innovative, but we're forced to use silly old paradigms. Fully SQL database driven. Everything has to be .NET. LINQ is not allowed.
      Now, the problem isn't the company, but the managers. They don't understand that LINQ isn't Entity Framework ("LINQ we don't allow because we can't tune DB queries"). Also: we use Visual Studio 2008. Because "old tech is proven and reliable". That is what my boss and his superiors actually believe.

  21. Data gathering? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    Time for your tin foil hats for this one. :)..

    .
    http://www.infowars.com/pokemo...

    Pokémon Go Linked to CIA Augmented reality software could turn smartphones into Imperial probe droids

    The ‘augmented reality’ mobile game Pokémon Go, which uses the player’s smartphone camera to ‘add’ Pokémon to real-world locations, has ties to the CIA. The developer of Pokémon Go, Niantic, Inc., was founded by John Hanke, who previously received funding from the CIA’s venture capital firm In-Q-Tel to develop what eventually became Google Earth.

    1. Re:Data gathering? by werepants · · Score: 1

      You should read Charles Stross' "Halting State". Forget data gathering, AR apps can be used to get people to do useful tasks for you, for free! Need someone to scope out a target of interest? Make it an objective in the game for them to take a picture of the area. Need someone to deliver a message or carry information discreetly? Make it part of the game, and give them points when the message is successfully dropped off.

      Controlling a popular AR game would allow you to create mobs on demand. This is limited only by the imagination.

  22. P2W by Mandrel · · Score: 1

    Pay-to-Win is the definition of capitalism.

    1. Re: P2W by Bartles · · Score: 1

      At least the game is winnable.

    2. Re: P2W by Mandrel · · Score: 2

      Life or Pokemon?

    3. Re: P2W by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      life, of course. whoever dies with the most toys wins.

    4. Re: P2W by Zaowulf · · Score: 1

      Whoever dies with the most toys, still dies. I don't think you understand the objective of the game.

  23. Re:POKEMON DEFLECT READERS FROM COMMENTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the CIA has complete control over Slashdot and cares enough to constantly monitor it for comments it doesn't like. But at the same time, it doesn't have the power to remove those comments and must instead resort to writing new stories to deflect attention from them. Got it.

  24. Lessons from Ingress by Centurix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It'll grow past the game it is and some people will figure out that they enjoy the indirect aspects of the game. Fitness groups, history study groups, faction gatherings, strategy planning groups. Ingress went from a game on the screen to people actually meeting and doing other stuff.

    --
    Task Mangler
  25. Tonight... by sudden.zero · · Score: 1

    ...we're gonna Pokie like it's 1999!

  26. Serious Google Account Exposure on iOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems the iOS version wants FULL access to all of your Google account info:

    http://mashable.com/2016/07/11/google-pokemon-go-app-security/#8GbDK1AprPqt

    The article states that the game creator, Niantic, is working on a fix to narrow it down to what is really necessary (user Id and email address), but unknown as yet as to when that fix will be available.

    RO

    1. Re:Serious Google Account Exposure on iOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already covered by a /. article a few days ago and already addressed and fixed by Niantic. Please try to keep up.

  27. Re:people spend more time in its app than in Faceb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Historically speaking, people without compassion and empathy tend to hide their crap well and tend to be much more guarded against typical human scheming and unpredictability thus increasing their survival ratings,
    while people with compassion and empathy tend to be the first idiots to fall because with those two traits comes a giant jump in naivety and self-destructive trustworthiness whereby they get used as tools or sacrificial pawns easily.
    Sorry to burst your bubble, but someone had to. If there's one thing the human species is good at, and woe be any alien idiots who try to invade, it's scheming and unpredictability.
    From politicians up there making it a hobby of fucking everyone over around them and manipulating whole groups, to business people manipulating the politicians and society with marketing, to average Joes manipulating their job environment to enable easy-going laziness or hierarchical movement within the company, to the all-too-cliche manipulation involving romance and relationships, down to the children manipulating parents to evade chores or the school environment for grades and test avoidance,
    it is always the manipulators who go ahead, while you compassionate sympathy machines end up dragging behind or being used like condoms to be tossed away.

    Hell and welcome to Humanity, enjoy your stay. Next time your are competing with me on a job offer or advancement, expect me to not be compassionate and filled with all that rainbow sympathy, because i'll defame you, set you up, and do all in my power so you lose you job (and thus my competition). And i'll sleep like a baby after that because your failure means more food on my family's table. There is no share and care bubba.

  28. Re:people spend more time in its app than in Faceb by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am sorry, but I can't feel compassion for people who walk into their own grave because they're too stupid to take a look first. It might surprise you, though, that I am VERY readily willing to offer any help to people who got into a difficult situation without any fault of their own. Not going into private details here, but that can go to lengths others wouldn't even consider.

    But no regret, no compassion, no empathy for people too stupid to survive. Ever.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  29. Doom Go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about first person shooters where you can be the shooter or the monster, in public? that should be nice clean fun.

  30. Impressive by jxander · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All the more impressive considering that it's a shit Pokemon game. It's a decent Engress mod, sure, but as a Pokemon game, it's terrible

    There are almost no battles. The few that exist are limited to mashing your screen, instead of the turn-based strategy usually associated with Pokemon.

    And those scant few battles do not grant experience to your critters. The only way to level them up is to capture a couple dozen of the same 'mon, and grind them into kibble ("candies"). You'll get a couple dozen levels from each candy (current peak levels in the 1000-1500 range). Evolving takes between 15-400 candies. Oh, and the candies are breed specific.

    These come to a hilarious point regarding your starter Pokemon. Normally, you pick one of 3 or 4 Pokemon to start your game, and that critter can level with you the whole game long. You'll give them a unique name, see them evolve and mature. You still pick a starter here, but none of that emotional attachment here. Your starter will be universally ground into the aforementioned kibble and fed to a higher level version of itself caught in the wild.

    --
    This signature is false.
    1. Re:Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      yeah what a terrible game 21 million people playing it every day having an awesome time

      here, have zero fucks to add to your gigantic pile

    2. Re:Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hang on, the way to make your monster more powerful is murder its brothers and feed it their entrails, which totally doesn't just give it a prion disease? Then you can force it to fight in mortal combat?

      Cartoon drawings aside, this sounds like a pretty horrific game.

    3. Re:Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but none of that emotional attachment here. Your starter will be universally ground into the aforementioned kibble and fed to a higher level version of itself caught in the wild.

      So it's teaching kids about the brutalities of real life then? Kudos Niantic.. Kudos.

    4. Re:Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about taking cute picture of pokémons and that's it? I thought half the people would like to keep it at that.
      Grinding an 8bit RPG three hours a day would be a nerd game.

    5. Re:Impressive by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 1

      I always thought it was odd when my kids were watching Pokemon VHS tapes in the late 90s, that it was basically a cartoon about cock-fighting. These kids would travel all over the place, capture these semi-intelligent animals and then force them to fight for their amusement.

    6. Re:Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So "Transferring your pokemon to the Professor" is a euphemism for "Grinding your pokemon into a thin red paste and compressing it into a candy"

    7. Re:Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, technically Prof Willow pays you one candy for the pokemon when you "transfer" it. What he actually does with them is left unexplained.

      However as this is the Pokemon universe, he's probably constructing some sort of doomsday machine or crime empire out of them in some vaguely inhumane way, and the first we'll hear for sure is when home hotshot 10 year old who's beaten 8 gyms and captured a legendary pokemon or two takes him down.

    8. Re:Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'm not a fan of the lack of leveling up. It wouldn't be difficult to allow you to fight off wild pokemon with one of yours and have them earn XP. At the very least, maybe stepping the candies back to type-specific instead of pokemon-specific would make things a bit less annoying.

    9. Re:Impressive by jxander · · Score: 1

      I never said it was a bad game.

      Quite the opposite, I said it's a good Ingress mod. Ingress is already a popular title, so a good mod to a good game is ... good

      That said, it's a terrible Pokemon game, with only superficial nods to the series. You can like the game all you want, it can be popular as pie, but it betrays the title.

      --
      This signature is false.
    10. Re:Impressive by jxander · · Score: 1

      Yup ... this also makes rare critters basically worthless.

      More of the same species = more kibble to level up others of that species. Rare Pokemon are, well, rare... giving you less kibble with which to upgrade.

      --
      This signature is false.
  31. OWW! My Balls! (or my vagina) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    coming soon!

  32. Re:people spend more time in its app than in Faceb by narcc · · Score: 1

    But no regret, no compassion, no empathy for people too stupid to survive. Ever.

    People like children and those with intellectual disabilities...

    Oh, not those people, right? You surely have compassion and empathy for them. Where do you draw the line? What sort of person do you actually have in mind? Who isn't worthy of the same consideration you so generously offer to others?

  33. Re:POKEMON DEFLECT READERS FROM COMMENTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You watch too much TV. They didn't drop in from choppers and Delta Force to secure the perimeter in San Diego, holding Carmen hostage dumbfuck.

    They monitor more than Slashdot. Slashdot is just high traffic with a lot of business/tech people so they have to. Ycombinator and others too.

    If they delete them they tell on themselves harder. You are too stupid.

  34. Re:POKEMON DEFLECT READERS FROM COMMENTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They thought they have to.

  35. Re:POKEMON DEFLECT READERS FROM COMMENTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's time you came out of the closet, the world is a much more accepting place than in the 50's

  36. Yawn by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

    I've seen a lot of MMO launches. Tell me the numbers in 6 months.

    --
    See that "Preview" button?
    1. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you apparently haven't seen the ridiculous volume of searches for Pokemon MMOs, otherwise you wouldn't be yawning

  37. Re:people spend more time in its app than in Faceb by xvan · · Score: 1

    John Nash? is that you?

  38. Trial Runs for 666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ~ Star Trek:TNG Episode: "The Game"
    [link to memory-alpha.wikia.com]

    This PEEK AT YOU game sounds insane - but it's just another step towards...

    -------- "THE MARK!" --------

    Welcome to prime time!
    A chip is all it takes!
    Only a small rice sized chip or smaller!
    You'll always be online! Jacked In!

    Are you ready?

    Sponsored by M$, 666 Beast Mode Energy, etc.

  39. "it is seeing people"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, no it isn't.
    A game doesn't "see" anything, nor do any other inanimate objects, nor concepts. So "the Coronation of the Queen saw her immaculately dressed in a silk gown", etc. is media-talk bullshit. Journo-speak. They're too stupid to remember how to write English properly, so they rewrite the language.
    For example, journalists have now decided that it's too difficult to write 'N.A.S.A' or 'A.I.D.S.', and now claim that writing the very misleading word 'Aids' or 'Nasa' is acceptable.

  40. Jolly good time, Roger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's because you're British (or one their subsidiaries). You guys are always 10 years behind the U.S. I don't know how, and I don't know why, but you are. Your kids will have their smartphones shoved up their ass 24/7 in a few more years, I promise. Speaking of being behind, you guys have another remarkable talent that I'm curious to know about. How can British studios take the top-of-the-line, state-of-the-art, awesome-est camera known to mankind and make it look like a 1963 episode of Star Trek? You might be 10 years behind us culturally but you haven't changed you film equipment since Monty Python's Search for the Holy Grail. Even the new Dr Who looks like it was filmed in some dude's basement with an old fashioned, hand cranked camera and then post processed with "special effects" added through a trial version of Windows Movie Maker. To put it in British terms: it boggles the mind.

    1. Re:Jolly good time, Roger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you're British (or one their subsidiaries). You guys are always 10 years behind the U.S. I don't know how, and I don't know why, but you are. Your kids will have their smartphones shoved up their ass 24/7 in a few more years, I promise. Speaking of being behind, you guys have another remarkable talent that I'm curious to know about. How can British studios take the top-of-the-line, state-of-the-art, awesome-est camera known to mankind and make it look like a 1963 episode of Star Trek? You might be 10 years behind us culturally but you haven't changed you film equipment since Monty Python's Search for the Holy Grail. Even the new Dr Who looks like it was filmed in some dude's basement with an old fashioned, hand cranked camera and then post processed with "special effects" added through a trial version of Windows Movie Maker. To put it in British terms: it boggles the mind.

      Just one word for you: Downton Abbey.

  41. safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the pokemon go creators need to detect that you're in a car travelling above speeds a human could obtain on foot at a mere walk and disable the app until you pull over.

  42. actually. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    biggest spy game

  43. What If.. . by realperseus · · Score: 1

    What if this Pokemon game is a project designed to map, view, and record areas that were previously unmapped/not yet recorded for future use by a yet to be named entity for whatever purpose they please? Think about it.

    --
    "Trusting every aspect of our lives to a giant computer was the smartest thing we ever did.." Homer Simpson
  44. An idiot plays what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aside from a great launch meaning nothing in terms of endurance, the touted 7.5 Billion increase is only .26% of Nintendo's market capitalization. Not 26%, not 2.6%, but twenty six hundredths of a percent. That's a yawn, not a blockbuster success, except to idiots impressed by the number zeros something has.

  45. Broken out of the box. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure how this became so popular when logging in doesn't even work. Been trying for 3 days to register an account without success. I've moved on. Let me know when their server infrastructure is stable.

  46. Re:people spend more time in its app than in Faceb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    meh, I have compasion and empathy but also support self determination. As walking is a voluntary action, I'm inclined to celebrate their success at walking where they want even if it's off a cliff (you show gravity who's boss maybe you'll win).

  47. Re:people spend more time in its app than in Faceb by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Neither children nor disabled people chose their condition. Try again.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  48. Re:people spend more time in its app than in Faceb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We see the world through the lenses of our own eyes. Those with fewer experiences cannot fathom the journey of others, especially if it's a really different lifestyle. Think able-bodied youth vs wheelchair-bound retiree. So some folks will scold others for not being able to fit within their own narrative of daily life- (ie: why can't you use the stairs? I can so I've no sympathy for you if you're late!).

    That's why wisdom is so valuable, because it can remind us to hush up when things don't go exactly the way we would do it... and to remember others are doing the best they can with what they've got.

    Until, umm, someone really is stupid and looking down into their device while walking into the street. This phenomenon is relatively new you know... there really is no excuse :D

    PARENTS, PLEASE TEACH YOUR KIDS TO WALK WITH DEVICE IN POCKET OR AT LEAST DON'T LOOK AT IT UNTIL STANDING STILL!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl0JojWH1rQ

    _

  49. Non-Death of Nintendo continues to baffle experts by kartaron · · Score: 2

    Every generation of consoles cause streams of claims the sky has finally fallen in on Nintendo. Sega's (and Turbographics)CD based systems were the initial perceived killer. After that the N64 (still cartridge based) was not powerful enough to compete. Then the Gamecube was again not powerful enough to play the games people wanted to buy. Then the Wii was just the cube put into a new box with fancy shake equipped controllers. At every stage Nintendo causes a rip to form in the 'power is everything' argument. Nintendo clearly isnt working on the same model. Nintendo creates fads and they ride those through the hardware eras. They invest their billions on unique hardware and create opportunities for completely original gameplay. Nintendo brought back gaming in the 80s. They mastered the art of fun immersive long form adventure gaming with Zelda, Metroid and Mario in the 90s. They basically invented party gaming with the Wii in the 2000s. Meanwhile their portable gaming has been on the cutting edge the entire time until phones became portable computers. Despite the loss of control over that portable market they have now found a way to revitalize both the portable gaming industry and Nintedo themselves. In a year there will be a dozen games blatantly copying this new innovation and Nintendo will have the best of them. Part of this is because Sony and Microsoft treat their consoles as an inroad to gaining customers in other branches of technology or services. Nintendo just wants people to play their games.

  50. Re:people spend more time in its app than in Faceb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John Nash? is that you?

    Umm... more of a Manson family member, methinks.

  51. Re:people spend more time in its app than in Faceb by narcc · · Score: 1

    Keep moving that goal post. You stated, quite clearly:

    But no regret, no compassion, no empathy for people too stupid to survive. Ever.

    Can you choose to be "too stupid to survive"? That's incoherent. Obviously, being "too stupid to survive" is beyond the control of those "too stupid to survive".

    Or do you mean "I have no compassion or empathy for people of otherwise normal intelligence who take unnecessary risks"? Well, that makes it easy for you to feel superior to anyone for any reason. (Let's face it, this is all about you feeling superior to an entire class of people.) I don't know that anyone has ever lived their entire life without taking an unnecessary risk. Most people take unnecessary risks every single day. I suspect you also take a fair number of unnecessary risks.

    See, you can't actually sort-out what sort of person you think is unworthy of the same basic considerations you'd offer any person. Callous statements like the one you made are completely empty. The sort of nonsense you'd hear from self-righteous teens looking to bolster their own egos.

    You're very likely a much better person than your comment suggests. If you give it a little thought, you'll find that you can't stand by your comment without making a deeply uncomfortable ethical compromise.

  52. No Math by wasteoid · · Score: 1

    I was told there would be no math.

  53. Re:people spend more time in its app than in Faceb by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You're very good at selective quoting and quotemining. Picking the part about idiocy and leaving out the part where I talk about this not applying to people who are in a disadvantaged position due to no error on their side.

    Be it as it may, since nobody really gives a fuck anymore and nobody but the two of us are reading this anymore, and you have made up your mind about me, this is basically as much time as I'm willing to invest here.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  54. Re:people spend more time in its app than in Faceb by narcc · · Score: 1

    I think my point is made. You are incapable of answering the only question I've asked you: how you determine who is and is not a recipient of your compassion and empathy.

    The answer, obviously, is that you can not. Not without making a deeply uncomfortable ethical compromise. That is, you can not stand by your claim that you have "no regret, no compassion, no empathy for people too stupid to survive. Ever."

    I don't care if you just want to "win" a silly argument on the internet and won't admit it here, as long as you can admit it to yourself. You are very likely a much better person than your crass comment suggests. Your stubborn refusal to make the ethical compromise necessary to stand by that terrible comment suggests that.

  55. It's official: The US is DOOMED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our country is falling apart, we got civil unrest involving violence between black people and law enforcement, the job market is shrinking, Donald Trump is about to be elected president, and we got people chasing a POKEMON! Not just kids; the adults are doing it too! >-D LOL!

  56. New suicide game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the new texting and driving.. only you are walking or driving to your death. Maybe they should make it avoid roads and not GPS your ass of the grand canyon.

  57. slither by allo · · Score: 1

    irrelevant as fuck.
    The game is great in a browser (but cpu heavy and not using multiple cores), but sucks on mobile devices. Just like agar its controls are made for a mouse, not a touch screen.
    If you want a game, which actually works better on a touch screen install osmos. Looks like agar, has a similiar objective (in some types of levels) but the controls work with tapping behind instead of moving the mouse point in the direction you want to go. So they are great on tablets or even phones.

  58. Re:Waze by trigggl · · Score: 1

    There's an app for that.

    --
    Ops, I shuld have usd the prevuwe but in.
  59. Donald Trump Has Dementia ( Score: +5, True ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until they're sued for contributing to auto accidents.

    Yours In Safety,
    K. Trout

    P.S.: Trump supporters are morons.

  60. I see bums on the street... by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    ...slashing out at virtual fruit and ranting about green pigs. They were playing some game called MD2020

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.