No, it is a twisted interpretation of the law. "The state" is used seven times in the law and this is the only instance where the court has decided it must mean the sate and the federal government.
Well, there is lots of corporate welfare in the US. It generally doesn't work out. Greece being a fully socialist country, it's corporations are fully dependent on the State. Funny that you failed to mention that.
That's great that you screen calls. I screen scam artists that show up on my doorstep as well. But that literally has never happened. These calls are illegal and need to stop. The FTC needs to do something about it or pay the price.
It was Obama. He signed the Patriot Act Extension into law in 2011. We wouldn't be talking about this if he had vetoed or refused to sign. As of just before midnight on May 26th, 2011, Barack Obama assumed ownership of the Patriot Act.
Except that when Obama is President, Congress using it's Constitutional powers to withhold funding is cast as, "Republicans holding guns to the heads of the American People." So don't count on that working.
That's the argument Keynesians make. Others more grounded in reality would argue it was caused by The federal reserve and it's loose monetary policy starting in 1933. When the Fed slowed the printing of money in 1936 and 37 as it had to do to control inflation, it caused the recession. If it hadn't been printing money like mad in the first place this recession wouldn't have happened. It's a good lesson for today, as we are in a similar situation.
No, you gave me a link to an economic theory that repeatedly fails when it is tried as a method to spur growth. I ask you again. Did FDR cut spending and balance the budget?
Slashdot Mirror
Generally only one justice writes an official dissent. Other justices may also write individual dissents.
No, it is a twisted interpretation of the law. "The state" is used seven times in the law and this is the only instance where the court has decided it must mean the sate and the federal government.
Except there's a definitions section to the law that defines the State as "one of the 50 states". But go ahead. Ignore that.
Most republican would terminate corporate welfare as well. They aren't generally big fans of subsidies.
Ahh yes. It's only people that don't share your ideology that are ideological. Your ideology is of course totally rooted in facts and reality.
But no individuals entered into this contract.
Well, there is lots of corporate welfare in the US. It generally doesn't work out. Greece being a fully socialist country, it's corporations are fully dependent on the State. Funny that you failed to mention that.
Ehh. In a few months Greece will totally implode and it won't matter anyway. Enjoy your generous social welfare system while you can.
This administration doesn't fire anyone. Haven't you noticed that yet?
That's great that you screen calls. I screen scam artists that show up on my doorstep as well. But that literally has never happened. These calls are illegal and need to stop. The FTC needs to do something about it or pay the price.
About 10 seconds of thought on this hypothesis would show how erroneous it is.
What exactly does this have to do with trans fats?
No it's not. This is the first time this has been done. There will be tons of actual rules to draft.
Do you realize how contradictory you sound?
After the regulatory language is actually written, it will be thousands of pages.
Correct. You don't need thousands of pages of regulations to ban throttling.
Ok, lets eliminate your so called pollutant. Carbon Dioxide is the only "pollutant" I know of whose elimination would destroy all life on Earth.
On May 26th, 2011 Barack Obama signed an extension of the Patriot Act into law. He assumed ownership of it at that point.
It was Obama. He signed the Patriot Act Extension into law in 2011. We wouldn't be talking about this if he had vetoed or refused to sign. As of just before midnight on May 26th, 2011, Barack Obama assumed ownership of the Patriot Act.
Except that when Obama is President, Congress using it's Constitutional powers to withhold funding is cast as, "Republicans holding guns to the heads of the American People." So don't count on that working.
That's the argument Keynesians make. Others more grounded in reality would argue it was caused by The federal reserve and it's loose monetary policy starting in 1933. When the Fed slowed the printing of money in 1936 and 37 as it had to do to control inflation, it caused the recession. If it hadn't been printing money like mad in the first place this recession wouldn't have happened. It's a good lesson for today, as we are in a similar situation.
No, you gave me a link to an economic theory that repeatedly fails when it is tried as a method to spur growth. I ask you again. Did FDR cut spending and balance the budget?
I think you should do it.
FDR cut spending and balanced the budget?
WTF? Do you like paying interest? If you can pay it off, stop paying for your banker's new Mercedes. You need the money more than s/he does.