That's what diagnosis is for. You don't get to automatically void the warranty because of the chance of that. Same as changing the oil on your car. The car warranty is still valid for everything specifically unaffected by the service provider's negligence.
The AMP framework hands the content over to Google to cache. They don't send visitors to your site from the SERP. You're effectively involving Google whether you want to or not.
This is a Windows problem, not a Chrome problem. Windows shouldn't be sending out credentials unless it knows they belong to the server it's authenticating with. This is like visiting a random web page on the Internet and Chrome helpfully filling in the login box with your bank username and password.
Because most empty space is really cold, and while this may be large percentages colder it's still more or less the same compared to planets and stars.
the cold spots visible universe extends 9.5 billion light years away from it, which is very roughly 20 billion light years away from us, far past our visible universe.
If this universe emerged from a singularity and expanded at no more than the speed of light, than the observable universe by extents of light reach is the entire universe. How would a far away area get light from further away unless the universe expanded faster than light?
If the "shortage" was a lean inventory failing to predict demand, then it could just as well be artificial. If it was an industry-wide shortage and not just ordering late from a supplier, it makes sense.
Their drivers can't just pick random people up off the street. They have to be dispatched through the app. That makes them more like a limo service than taxi service. Any hired car service but a taxi would be an apt comparison, but I don't see the taxi connection.
It's razor handles all over again. Change the connector as soon as the patent expires. Every brand does it. Even within one brand it changes every few years.
They're not really 3rd party. They're 100% locked to Apple's policies, NDA, pricing restrictions, etc. About the only difference is that they're not Apple employees.
Either way - you can't do it unless you're approved by Apple. And with that, probably some requirements on pricing have to be agreed to. No one else can get the parts - and that impression alone carries to even the authorized service centers.
They're not on your site. They can't click to get to other pages of your site. The only visible navigation takes them back to Google. You have no control over your own web site when displayed via AMP.
This bill basically allows you to deconstruct an Apple iPhone, replace all it's parts with knock-offs and then go back and get a new authentic one from Apple
If you replace all its parts, then it isn't the iPhone you bought anymore. This bill means that if your touch screen on your printer shorts out, they won't void the warranty for using third-party ink. There are lots of situations where it's tough to tell if the third-party part would cause a problem - and I'm sure the courts would side with Apple on some of those if it came to that. But having your digitizer replaced should not prevent you from getting a replacement for a faulty battery.
Right now, Apple makes nothing on an independent repair shop's work; they don't get a device sale, they don't get parts sales, they don't get repair fees, they get nada.
But overall, they make more on new device sales than they'd make by making the parts available officially. Not everyone will take the phone to anywhere but Apple until the big name stores are getting into the repair business - which they won't if there's no official parts source - too much liability.
The touch-part of the touchscreen, digitizer, is sometimes glued to the screen. It does not have to be but it is to make the glass harder to replace when it shatters
This isn't for no reason - it helps keep humidity/condensation and dust out from between the layers. Both problems I had with my old flip phone. This may not be the only reason they do this, of course.
For the purposes of software preservation, this is plenty useful. If you want to run old software for any reason, this is far better than WINE (even with what they share) and more ethical and more secure than trying to track down a pirate copy of XP.
So far I've noticed that sites using AMP have fewer as and less clutter.
The only problem I've come across is no easy way to get to the real source URL if I want to see the full page or view comments. Google is trying to erect a walled garden here where is unwanted.
If the checksum matches, then you can download and verify. If a bad actor wanted to hack the Ubuntu web site, they would change the checksum on the page to match the bad download - which wouldn't match posted checksums elsewhere.
None of these arguments have told me why a torrent tracker is more trustworthy or more convenient than the source - which was the entire point of the thread.
That's what diagnosis is for. You don't get to automatically void the warranty because of the chance of that. Same as changing the oil on your car. The car warranty is still valid for everything specifically unaffected by the service provider's negligence.
The AMP framework hands the content over to Google to cache. They don't send visitors to your site from the SERP. You're effectively involving Google whether you want to or not.
This is a Windows problem, not a Chrome problem. Windows shouldn't be sending out credentials unless it knows they belong to the server it's authenticating with. This is like visiting a random web page on the Internet and Chrome helpfully filling in the login box with your bank username and password.
cold spot = center of the universe. If everything expanded from there, would anything be left there?
Because most empty space is really cold, and while this may be large percentages colder it's still more or less the same compared to planets and stars.
the cold spots visible universe extends 9.5 billion light years away from it, which is very roughly 20 billion light years away from us, far past our visible universe.
If this universe emerged from a singularity and expanded at no more than the speed of light, than the observable universe by extents of light reach is the entire universe. How would a far away area get light from further away unless the universe expanded faster than light?
If the "shortage" was a lean inventory failing to predict demand, then it could just as well be artificial. If it was an industry-wide shortage and not just ordering late from a supplier, it makes sense.
Uber is no different than traditional taxis
Their drivers can't just pick random people up off the street. They have to be dispatched through the app. That makes them more like a limo service than taxi service. Any hired car service but a taxi would be an apt comparison, but I don't see the taxi connection.
It's razor handles all over again. Change the connector as soon as the patent expires. Every brand does it. Even within one brand it changes every few years.
They're not really 3rd party. They're 100% locked to Apple's policies, NDA, pricing restrictions, etc. About the only difference is that they're not Apple employees.
Either way - you can't do it unless you're approved by Apple. And with that, probably some requirements on pricing have to be agreed to. No one else can get the parts - and that impression alone carries to even the authorized service centers.
They're not on your site. They can't click to get to other pages of your site. The only visible navigation takes them back to Google. You have no control over your own web site when displayed via AMP.
Good for me if I can remember it, but it's hardly discoverable - bad UI design.
This bill basically allows you to deconstruct an Apple iPhone, replace all it's parts with knock-offs and then go back and get a new authentic one from Apple
If you replace all its parts, then it isn't the iPhone you bought anymore. This bill means that if your touch screen on your printer shorts out, they won't void the warranty for using third-party ink. There are lots of situations where it's tough to tell if the third-party part would cause a problem - and I'm sure the courts would side with Apple on some of those if it came to that. But having your digitizer replaced should not prevent you from getting a replacement for a faulty battery.
The last update an iDevice gets tends to slow it down so much that no one wants to use it anymore anyway. At least that was true with my iPod touch.
Right now, Apple makes nothing on an independent repair shop's work; they don't get a device sale, they don't get parts sales, they don't get repair fees, they get nada.
But overall, they make more on new device sales than they'd make by making the parts available officially. Not everyone will take the phone to anywhere but Apple until the big name stores are getting into the repair business - which they won't if there's no official parts source - too much liability.
Resoldering components is done all the time.
But not by the manufacturer, usually. Therefore, no argument to make the SoC available separately for example.
The touch-part of the touchscreen, digitizer, is sometimes glued to the screen. It does not have to be but it is to make the glass harder to replace when it shatters
This isn't for no reason - it helps keep humidity/condensation and dust out from between the layers. Both problems I had with my old flip phone. This may not be the only reason they do this, of course.
For the purposes of software preservation, this is plenty useful. If you want to run old software for any reason, this is far better than WINE (even with what they share) and more ethical and more secure than trying to track down a pirate copy of XP.
Most sites have a web optimized version
On the web, some would even view this as mandatory.
2B or not 2B, that isn't really the question.
You're putting your content inside their walled garden and losing autonomy. The bandwidth savings is only a side effect at best.
So far I've noticed that sites using AMP have fewer as and less clutter.
The only problem I've come across is no easy way to get to the real source URL if I want to see the full page or view comments. Google is trying to erect a walled garden here where is unwanted.
7MW isn't a rate.
If the checksum matches, then you can download and verify. If a bad actor wanted to hack the Ubuntu web site, they would change the checksum on the page to match the bad download - which wouldn't match posted checksums elsewhere.
None of these arguments have told me why a torrent tracker is more trustworthy or more convenient than the source - which was the entire point of the thread.